for your quiet life . yes, thank you. i'm also the first in the style of andrey viktorovich. limited nuclear war is an illusion that there can be no limited nuclear war. this is a global catastrophe with the mutual destruction of the united states of the russian federation, along with all regions, and so on. france can only be destroyed with nuclear weapons ; there is no other way to destroy the state. nuclear weapons curtain negotiating peace

on russian terms will not be this, therefore, to talk about what is needed there defiantly deliver some kind of blow. i think that this is not entirely responsible, the second is about nuclear tests. full-scale nuclear tests are needed to test new ammunition in our country, unlike the americans. we do not have old ammunition in warehouses. we produce ammunition and dispose of it, so to speak, well, let's put it this way the legacy of the soviet economy is closed cities, uh, single-industry towns, and so on americans. eh, they don't do that. they have now opened a plant in pandax, but about the resumption of production. i didn't hear. and so they all their factories have closed, so they extend the life of e-e nuclear weapons through computer simulations. what we are doing, by

the way, and we are second, we have one training ground left. only the novaya zemlya semipalatinsk test site was liquidated. just before the conclusion of the universal nuclear test ban treaties. hmm, we conducted about 600 test explosions in all environments 450 at the semipalatinsk test site and 150 at. well, i am rounding the numbers there, but on novaya zemlya what we want, we can, of course, resume full-scale tests on novaya zemlya, but with one on the other hand, we are trying to turn artik into some sort of a storehouse of minerals from the northern sea route, so to speak, so that new objects and possibly cities appear there on a rotational basis , and on the other hand, we will resume nuclear testing. now about withdrawing from the treaty. hmm, i'm not a big fan. uh, well, two cis agreements. well, the agreements are absolutely unprofitable. for us, these are

purely political agreements, which, so to speak, were concluded by gorbachyov. all other contracts, well, you can get out of anywhere, you can get out, you can get out of the day. by the way, about nuclear weapons antarctic treaty antarctic treaty outer space treaty seabed treaty we are all participating from everywhere. you can go out, you can go out and your teeth. why why then object to withdrawing from the un well, they left the un, they left the security council switzerland was over. there is no sixty years of prolveta in all other structures, and in all other structures in the obse, the principle of the concept operates, therefore the teeth of c e are never one decision of the obse. uh, so to speak, without the consent of russia, not a single decision of the osce has yet passed is not dominant and cannot start a war by the decision of the security council. maybe, as the korean war began, so leaving this

structure presents its own dangers for us. exit from the osce poses no military danger, well, i say that you can get it everywhere, but we can withdraw from all international organizations in accordance with international treaties, but they will only applaud us. honestly, but the whole west will simply applaud. here is a state that, so to speak, outside the framework of international relations is big russia. i don’t think that in this will be supported by ours, so to speak, and allies with impotents, such as china, india, and so on, i don’t think, i’m not sure of this, of all it’s not necessary. well, it makes no sense that we are not leaving the top twenty, because this is a technical connection. it is not necessary to eat contracts, some of them are necessary. no long ago even one could now try to use the situation, but if the initiation is possible from the organization of the world health organization. there, too, they

put spokes in our wheels from the international labor organization from all, so to speak, from all sports federations, from anywhere you can it will be the other way around. and from which ones you need to get out, i said the agreement on the inf, and the agreement. yes, we came out of all this quite consciously and completely correctly, because this is an agreement then we need to go out, well, with this it is proposed, on the one hand, you will pull it out from everywhere, you understand that you are not offering to stay everywhere. well, you see, there is only one treaty left, the cis. i believe that it will not be extended and there will be no new treaty under the current conditions either, because it is humiliating and i am against any negotiations to extend the treaty under the current conditions. sanctions. this is simply humiliating, but nevertheless i must say that this is purely from a military point of view. uh, having information is better than no information, because lack of information is always and uh, when we start from the worst-case

scenario, the americans will spend until they have not 1.500 downloads, but we have 3.000 a little less. well, we will assume, so to speak, that the more the enemy is always better, and therefore we will carry to increase our potential. we will not reach, of course, up to 30,000 warheads, as in the sixties. it is very expensive. but, of course, we will calmly reach the level of start-1 to 6,000. well, uh, he's going to die with himself. all other contracts. so i listed including, uh, nuclear testing. if the need arises, i'm sure of it, if it arises, especially since here, he says, new ammunition. well, when i dealt with this issue closely. i had advisers in consultants from the twelfth main directorate. we have the entire line of nuclear weapons. we have the entire line of thermonuclear munitions. well, what's new? can more ammunition e on new physical principles. well, it's not nuclear, it's not banned.

we can test these ammunition carriers. yes, carriers are appearing, new carriers are appearing hypersound, they are being tested and no one forbids this and cannot forbid it, because there are no, respectively, their agreements. much is said about political will. i also want to talk about political will. oh, i’m very skeptical at the first stages of our operation, when there was such a list of supplies, there are 60 countries, and uh, completely heterogeneous equipment and numbers there are 2 3, maximum 18. now it has passed. uh, in a completely new quality you can see all the taboos have been removed. and well, from tanks, to call uh amx-10rc, uh, a wheeled tank, in general, it seems to me that a wheeled tank is, in general, some kind of specific nonsense. yes, this is a heavy armored car. in general, this is a 15 mm self-propelled gun, but here is a bradley marder. yes

, this is all the technique of the seventies and eighties , but it is still in service. yes, the germans began to change to the puma, but so far the puma is not enough to arm the timaras, uh, bradley, uh, and m. e, 113 armored personnel carriers. they are also armed. moreover , the americans have a lot of them, and they will supply them in the same way as heavy howitzers. right now, paladin began to supply 155 mm, 18 howitzers, self-propelled e, 105 mm. that is, uh, this wave is growing, and it will grow and grow. i’m not very sure about abrams there , because abram is, first of all, he’s rather peculiar there, he’s very heavy 52 t, after all, the prodleparta is still harder, 69, as they say, the bridges in ukraine simply can’t withstand such tanks. and damn it with bridges. here

that's what i'm talking about, that's where it seems to me that political will is needed. well , start well, the river itself goes. e along the border. e ukraine and poland 14 bridges. well, what are they not? well, bridges are not the easiest. the goal, as they say, but so, well, andrey viktorovich well, i won't say so. you yourself speak and you don’t need to reveal all the secrets here, but i think they will find our uh, our armed forces, than uh, these masses, all the more it is not necessary, as they say, to destroy the supports of the central part, so to speak, here, the kherson bridge - this demonstrated destroyed the central span, and that's it. and besides the fact that he is in the picture and there is nothing useful from him. we met the dnieper, well, four of the twenty-nine railway bridges. well , you destroy these four bridges. try at least on it. this will be a signal from the west not to use nuclear weapons. that's

when we will begin to disable serious transport communications, two tunnels. yes , a very difficult goal, but nonetheless. i think that it is possible that the americans tried to drive out their church. well, not in the end got it. yes in the end is it possible to come to a ballistic missile in a conventional one in the usual kg equipment? well, you see, you are gradually approaching the use of nuclear no, but good. you have already reached the pre-kill missile in the usual equipment, but then later one short chance for the right weapon - this is a completely different quality, this is vladimir ivanovich, i also want to repeat where to start well? well , you yourself started that weapons based on new principles are already appearing. yes, it will be more powerful than this good. here are the principles when appears and you can, and you can find a person

they love, that is, it turns out the question is not the case, not the person. the fact is that there can be no limited nuclear war, i understand them. they they nuclear war are limited to be. maybe just now you are saying that we are drawing everything into new qualities. you said that if we destroy france, they will not kneel, they will not run over to us to put up well. and what should we do so that they come running to us to put up? so it means you need to win on the battlefield in ukraine, but victory, on the battlefield. nothing will end in ukraine . why even show intent? no, you say a contract, you are now a contract, or they are in europe, and there they are all contracts from 20:00 do not give a damn about the war, do not give a damn. and here to me children you that all the time i'm out there. wait first he spoke willingness to withdraw

from the test contract. you don't see what you're doing, don't care. they make sure we never got out. we can get out from anywhere. it's not me. i've been out of all of them for a long time . you stayed there man, that is, i don't where i can't get out. don't have the plenipotentiaries of a large deputy of the state duma, an ambassador for extremely plenipotentiary sent to the russian federation well, you just have these functions, i don't. but when you say how to put them? well, we understand, even if we reach the western border, more precisely, not even. and when we reach the western border of ukraine , nothing will end there, it will not end at all. they fit in so well that until the moment when we get there, we will see on the territory of ukraine he is still alive, not only polish parts that are actually present in full growth. here they need to be destroyed, where

are these polish on the territory of ukraine on the territory of poland on the march, when they go to the territory of ukraine well, because well, you see, we are military people, right. yes , we consider the balance of power. oh, here is the balance of forces in conventional weapons it is not in our favor to have nuclear weapons, but if you say in advance that nuclear weapons cannot be used. they understand this very well, they know that based on this, russia should be gradually depleted, but if he there were nuclear weapons, only we have no questions, but they also have weapons from the united states from france from great britain from thirty this means that you set poland and romania as possible targets, since they do not have nuclear weapons, since they do not have . imagine possible goals and you set possible

goals for ukraine, because they are the impossible use of nuclear weapons, part of this political means needs to be deterred. how this has kept the americans from supplying the entire spectrum of expression. here they are not in the crimea on the territory no. here is a simple simple question. the adams will begin our territory, for example, in the crimea , the question is a simple yet time, when they will seriously enter the territory of the russian federation with their troops, with their troops not advisers or there, uh, there mercenaries, who, but they entered correctly, but so far there is nothing that they said that we will fight on our own. fine? they did not declare war on vietnam , they did not declare war, it is not visible to cancer. well, neither syria, what are we, but the americans did not announce history, when it comes to

existence about the threat to the existence of the russian state, as written in our doctor. we are sure to use nuclear weapons. and before that, before all this talk. i believe, i believe, and before that at least go out and improve it's from everywhere. i'm not saying please, i don't know hit you this is repeating the cost is shown in that, in that cube, look. come in and they're watching us. this is how you speak and see. you are not from there again. where we enter to hear, and you immediately bomb. hey, you first come to cuba in them koragu, enter the windburg. this is north korea, all the weapons that it needs, this is also the whole spectrum of weapons, which let us already tell the ukrainian nazi. and we give anti-colonial forces all over the world it

's not a problem at all that nuclear weapons will soon appear in ukraine. well, how did germany get nuclear weapons, no matter what, yes, american, well, german pilots trained to work with them. and where do you have a guarantee that the americans will not spend the night with you hysterical and will not let ukrainian pilots at bases in poland. and what are we going to do? with this again he says, no, you are officially hammering us, they are hammering on our strategist. this is not a declaration of nuclear war a blow to the ba. to a strategic border builder - is this what they agreed on, from which he did not come out? we owe about it. why don't we answer? why is there a bank there? well, why, well, turn this jar into dust, he can turn weapons into dust. well, why can it be turned into dust with ordinary calibers, can a caliber be turned into a warhead of a caliber? no, dagger, if we say not a dagger, not a caliber, this is insufficient, you have already agreed. to me like it before ballistic missiles. now

let's get them right. because the output of any ballistic missile will be just behind the bottom to know what kind of warhead is there? in short, you yourself taught me this in the last program. you said that the ballistics came out, everything is perceived as a threat, but i like that you are already hanging closer to us. we have a rocket. here we have a lot . that's why it is necessary to fly not over long distances, the americans see perfectly calculates the trajectory. and if she flies on the territory of ukraine they will understand that this is not the only one can not understand why. so, who goes to kill a russian soldier in ukraine is a legal target in ukraine but is an illegal target in poland in germany in france in romania usa and great britain i don’t understand this logic completely, i just don’t understand, because if you propose to bomb bridges across ukraine and poland , there is a high probability, given the scatter, that you will also hit the territory of poland one hundred percent

proletarian decision. didn't want to touch the question of the christmas truce on several planes, the first, of course, caused a very different reaction. this is an initiative of our citizens, especially the people who are now at the front there. and of course, if you look at it from an ethical point of view, no one has any illusions that zelensky 's leadership of ukraine will hear this proposal. uh, they will decide to go to this temporary truce , if only because the believers would have the opportunity to go to temples so that they could celebrate christmas no illusions was, because these people are fiends. they have nothing to do with christianity, uh, at best, they hang announcements there that christ was born on december 25, so there will be no worship on january 6. i have seen these

photos at their worst. we saw these on his pagan satanists and various e. groups of absolutely crazy people who, among other things, set as one of their goals the destruction of orthodoxy in ukraine, but the second is the second plane in which this issue can be considered as far as the effect of this proposal itself is concerned. i think, that we are, if not for the first time, then a rare case when we actually took the diplomatic initiative, and we saw immediately how the rules of the game changed as soon as we took a step. we did not begin to respond to someone's initiatives, we did not begin a second reaction to some steps, when we made an unexpected move, we saw that for several days all western diplomacy was busy trying to justify their refusal to observe the christmas truce. and this is the most important thing. in fact. first, not a single state of endless diplomatic resource. no, if we do not do this, then they

spend their energy on passing a resolution condemning russia, they spend their time on different things. in diplomatic channels, drag to your side. at the very least, neutral states are often quite positive towards us and the state. and when we show initiative, they are forced to start playing according to our agenda. they are forced to respond to our agenda. and it is important to continue our work in this vein. and here is a conversation that concerns international organizations, although different points of view have different approaches, my attitude is extremely simple, very often our western opponents make it their main task to expel us from there. if we race to prove that we do not even need to be excluded. we are from here. we go to them. it is likely that it is simply easier for us to work. they don't need to make it easy. it is necessary to knit only struggles everywhere, so that they would not even dream of such a thing in a fairy tale about the fact that now everything will end. and that's when we start solving problems here and

there you have to forget, no one will wait for anything. we are either on every site on every front, we will work. so that they simply don’t have the opportunity to take a break, or we will simply make it easier for them to refuse to fight against confrontation with them and leave those areas where this struggle is. it would be possible to impose them in reality. two articles have been published. one came out. so, under the authorship of condoleezza rice and gates, uh, the entire article is, in general, devoted to explaining for a very long time. why russia can't afford lose. for a long time, systematically, he explains that for russia, losing is not an option, and at the end of the proposal, arms supplies will increase sharply . ukraine people are not idiots. that is, we can treat them as we please, but if they understand that defeat is not an option for russia. well, at the same time, they offer hmm arms supplies to increase. what goal do they set to prolong this

conflict even more, to deplete russia as much as possible in our resources of opportunity, because they understand that the military scenario of losing russia is not exists. the reasons that have already been said here, including those for and in connection with nuclear weapons, are necessary. yes and this article in the telegraph, where they are offering what? well, everything is crimea, it is not discussed at all; it is necessary to discuss korea, the kuriles and other territories of our country. what are we talking about? this speaks of the main vector in which they are going to work with us, that no one ever sets themselves the goal of looking at it. how will this confrontation in ukraine end? it will go on endlessly until until the ukrainians run out, then the poles begin to run out, then other nations that can be sent there endlessly to supply weapons in order to deplete our resources and in this regard , you need to soberly assess the situation, clearly understand for yourself that this year will be very heavy, because the more

ukraine will crash on the battlefield, and i call it ukraine conditionally, because if the state. the state does not produce its own weapons, the state does not buy these weapons, the state is not able to independently ensure the functioning of its own energy. everything else is a simulator of the state, which avatar is such that it is fueled by various real forces that stand behind it. well, we are dealing with such a simulator called ukraine. as uh, this fiasco will become more and more obvious. will grow. i agree than the likelihood that a second front will be opened against us. not in a formal, not in an official sense, about the way in which the rent-e corporation pleased us means in quotation marks in the reports of the nineteenth year, absolutely exactly. i am sure that in the near future we will deal with a sharp escalation of conflicts in the south caucasus between

the armies of azerbaijan. absolutely, we will deal with an aggravation in central asia without which we will definitely not manage. we are now seeing the hysteria that is dispersed by various fugitives of our citizens, then their ukrainian colleagues, about releasing saakashvili from prison. it seems to me that they also really need it in order to aggravate the situation in south ossetia in abkhazia because the current leadership of georgia, at least, as it seems to me, understands the disastrous nature of such steps for themselves, which you can’t clearly say, but saakashvili ’s opposition is quite well-known and whose hands are covered in blood there, and we, uh, right here again , we should not wait for what you know, now we have all the resources involved in ukraine, so we cannot deal with these issues now. now, when you finish, then no one will wait, there are no idiots who will sit waiting for us finished in ukraine, then returned to the south

caucasus, central asia, and will not be before that. either now we will simultaneously mobilize our own resources to the maximum and will not let foreign players into these regions. i want to remind you that our kings came to these lands. several centuries ago, not so that today the united states, great britain, turkey would stick their nose in there and try to provoke us in some way or impose new rules of the game on us, so that they would create new formats in which we are with him, we are still with no one in these regions without any compromise should not be considered. this is our land, our territory of strategic interests, everything that was part of the russian empire, and then the soviet union, this territory of strategic interests in russia, there should be no other players with whom we should negotiate. this is our territory. if you are interested in something there, go and negotiate with us. like this with other players. we can in some buffer zones further than these territories go there no one under any circumstances get in. impose some new

organizations on us. the new format and in which russia will be forced to participate have no right to understand this, first of all, and the elites of these local states, who, apparently, began to foresee something there and began to take part in new formats for themselves. and this must be understood directly by the forces that are getting in there, that we will not tolerate this, so that no one deceives us that we are so busy in ukraine that we do not see what is going on in our underbelly. on this we will respond. i hope extremely hard during this year. the rest, of course. all the time to keep in mind for the coming year that our opponents , in the end, everything they do is aimed at stabilizing the situation in the russian federation, causing, in the end, an unconstitutional overthrow of power and no other goal in the end, they have this case. no, they do not know that it is impossible to defeat us on the battlefield. they know the

script. there is no defeat for russia, therefore the only thing they will do is shake the situation from the inside, everything else is a huge pr campaign of volume, and a huge information attack on russia in order to ultimately shake the situation from the inside, so we must act. i think very confidently stable without sudden movements of various forward rhythm such a cheburashka . from here you will lead imagine you to the rank never lost bad times.

we have grenades, he wants to throw for his dad for his older brother from all coffee shops. and the challenge is to survive and to reach and there is no choice, the righteous, but there is a chance soon.

no. yu-khushnik

let me make a few short remarks on what has been said. here you don’t blame our such belarusian side, after all, because it’s so widely swung here, whether you go to france or to britain i personally stay away from belarus, as it were, poland jokes, you need to understand and not only to us, but also to polish and slovak, by the way, citizens, because we don’t speak much of slovakia and slovakia has turned into a full-fledged neither