there are no more questions, but for your own security zone, everything else is not even about history. that is, we had these people, the problem is that those people who today rule the united states of america and western europe here are two. so actually with those who howl against us, they have no future at all, no future at all, because they have entered into the most powerful economic in their history only. and they already suspect that there is no good

way out of it. and that means. what is needed while they still have the strength to eliminate those who can take their place in this sense, they are not afraid of china, so that china does not speak, it speaks in hieroglyphs and, accordingly, for this reason, no one but the chinese. nobody can understand this, so china is not a threat. this liberal western civilization is not a threat. and we are threats, because we speak the language that their people understand, and for this reason, they have very little time left to liquidate us, they also did not expect, did not expect the consolidation of our society, did not expect now i can just say what will happen tomorrow. they will take over. all those who

left each and every one of them will be forced to write for the title. to all friends to all relatives to tell scary tales, to promise anything. and there are not so few of them. ok then. let not there, not two or three million, but 800 thousand will be typed. i’ve omitted to quote the great falafel, but there are still greenhouses in hookahs, life is still glimmering in hookahs. yes, yes, yes, and for this reason, i understand clearly that we are now approaching a critical situation, in which we must endure. and they haven't thrown all their resources yet, and they will. they still will not have a nuclear war, because they clearly understand what we have in this place. well, let's call it such a polite word parity,

why won't it be? because this is for them a guaranteed guaranteed defeat. so maybe, so let it be they will not suit. they are just different things. that is, they will not start, but this does not mean that they will not. and this is, okay. okay, we have to be optimistic, nuclear will start war. well, yes, yes, yes, israel does not have nuclear weapons, but if necessary, it will definitely use goldenair. yes , yes, yes, this is a completely typical situation in any fight, it comes to a certain critical point, and it turns out that at this critical point. well, as it were, the resources are approximately equal and the back of a camel is sometimes ground by persh. we do not know what

kind of feather it will be. but the fact that the consolidation of society is absolutely necessary, firstly, and it is absolutely necessary to clean up the elite, because she, and another liberal has come. i among other things in terms of economic absolute liberals. yes, i guess. now we will clean up the elite and we will be like that in general. this is known so that there would be no war. it is necessary that all good people kill all the bad ones. well, yes, that's understandable. yes, and accordingly. there is one more small circumstance, which consists in this, but we do not have it today due to the fact that all our socio-political institutions have been captured by the liberals. and even if not liberals are placed in them, then the very structure of these institutions is so. what's there? well, nothing, everything

fight, zahir. i'm so very conditional and quoting. yes, that's why we need to win sometimes. we need new institutions. this is fundamentally what we need, we need new institutions. uh, cultural we need new public institutions. we need new public institutions, because they are educational, because without this it will not be possible to remake old institutions, it costs much more than to create new ones. well, i will say these in the end and many of them do not rework arose. in principle, i will tell you that our people spoke long before pour in the new wine of the old ages. well, yes, if we return to the classics of advertising.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. dmitry yes, i will support my colleagues and partly, so to speak, there you can argue i will popularize, well, firstly, a new world order is really coming, but this new world order and a new world. he arises really right. not to say so, not for something. well, not against something. it just comes objectively, the old butcher is disintegrating. something must be the old world order, no matter how it lacks no longer resources of unconnectedness, but no

further, as it were, ways of development. he chose everything he chose. that's it, by the way, speaking of the machine, by the way, economic, which is trying to break a lot of people in the world. not only we are there, not only the chinese, the chinese, by the way, many are questionable. this, of course, is not an american economic machine, no one wants to break the american military economic machine, but the global economic financial machine. of course, it would be nice to break it very much, but because it hinders the development of all countries that want to live. but in this sense, here, if you do not look, uh, we look at the situation in terms. i do not know there such very emotional terms there war and peace. here we have here, like, like the world. we have here, it seems, like a holiday there is a war. although it's all true, but it's all true, and in this sense, all our thoughts, all our prayers with our guys

, girls, who are there, it's true. well, our task is also to think and look into the future and evaluate in this sense. and this means looking at the future, which means they are evaluated with points of view. e historical retrospective is still the whole thing, and then i use it. excuse me, so to speak, so in terms, partly from social dynamics, partly from psychology. well, generally speaking, and war and peace, love and everything in the world. these are some kind of communications. a little more a little less lethal. and here, too, it turns out such a thing that, in fact, russia constantly really participated in communications with the sick or the less united west. yes, and once even it seemed to us that the relationship was more or less good, but this is a different since the most detrimental communications turned out to be for us, yevgeny yanych mentioned convergence here, in fact, until now, americans, including conservatives, for example, they claim that convergence was harmful to the united states because during the first phase of this convergence, all universities are there became marxist. well, such a trotskyist persuasion, but here is a marxist to discuss the correctness of this statement

separately, because it is captured by the left. that's for sure. yes, that's how they also think that they are just typical marxists. here, it was just not quite marxism with us. and so says nazism left with ostrovsky . here and there now they have. yes, not sanders in what radical? well, yes, yes, in this sense, for example, when this convergence actually arose, what is very interesting in the era of detente concerns the union of proof that it is a great power, that it cannot be attacked, so that it is known who will win in a nuclear war this knowledge, so to speak, that the ussr is a dead hand, the so-called system. yes, which will reach it is theirs the name, by the way, is a dead hand, our, in my opinion, the perimeter is called now you don’t understand the perimeter, that’s the one that will reach them in any case, you can’t fight with us like that. well, let's unload then. well, let's communicate, maybe the soviet union will really arrange some kind of convergence and in an amazing way. that's what really soviet here completely failed. this is the period that the rank was given.

here, well, it was not necessary even it was possible not to ignore the arms race even further. you could do your own development. an amazing time at this very moment the soviet union is curtailing the path of sovereign development, it begins to build factories there to buy for oil industry. so, accordingly, everything in the world is to launch bourgeois western goods here, how do i feel about it, he definitely turned away from his soviet path of development. it is at this moment that you need to say everything, everything, so to speak, a matter of time. and now let's look at our current situation. yes, it is clear that they, of course, ideally would like to destroy us. well, ideally, yes, that's how they are we are not, but it is clear that this is not a very realistic description from their point of view of what they can achieve. this means that they must somehow end this first hot phase , and there will be much more in history, as there have been many in history. us at home. so, here they are on some result should finish this whole thing. what would they want from us in this situation

, but if we disappeared completely, glory to god, they now understand that this, like earlier in history, will not work. well, probably, that's exactly the same as it was. wanted there in at one time, napoleon spoke frankly about this, that, of course, they didn’t want any ruin of russia there and so on, of course, they didn’t want any line of arkhangelsk astrakhan there, but he wanted russia to cease to be a great power later, when historians began to dig. actually in this whole world they have very clearly defined what it means. this means that russia does not have its own zone of influence. it is the first thing in the sense that it does not provide. there is security. here are some peoples and countries that can turn to russia and russia how the great power has the right to come to their aid great has the right. this is the first, second. they spread their trading rules to their economy. they have the right, in a certain way, to expand economically to a certain region, because the great ones kept it, but then they thought europeans in european ways, as it were, but including ways that were finally significant

ruble. so what else were they talking about? this is with regard to the saltykov-shchedrin said that for a ruble only in the face they can or whatever it is now there is nothing. it will soon be in the face to give in practice. it’s like, well, not true, the ruble was highly valued in europe and, by the way, speaking the ruble sometimes, irritated even more than the russian soldier, somewhere out there yes, in europe, and finally, this is the third point, and finally, so the fourth point, which here is exactly what is existence. a great christian power, which is not identical in europe, which is opposed to it, has its own set of social flows, which, by the way, then differ much less from them from european kings of liberal chile catherine corresponded with walter and so on. that's all jason vot but nevertheless it was an alternative civilization. which yes was then close, but it is obvious that she offered her own set of social and ethical

norms. these four things mean being a great power. it is curious that throughout history, what we can know is that we reliably know all these communications with the west, sometimes quite decent relations. these were, in general, by today's standards. and here they were. so that sometimes we acted authoritarianly because it always presents it to us as a quality. and, well, as if accusations, yes, it's true, they acted, one or the tatars. in the sense that we are in our zone of influence or where we thought that something was wrong, we could quite authoritatively, that is, on our own, without looking back at the cinema of the norms of international law, come to look for nothing to do with international law. we think this authoritarian way of doing things is the right thing to do, but we never said at all that europe should live like russia or in america it is worth settling in your life. so how do you say it? on rusich, and they acted totalitarianly, this elite regime differs from authoritarian ones in that they climb into your bed. they are here in your kitchen climb to your

school in kindergarten and in your church. and that's how it happened all the time. well, i think that in the future, as in russia, in fact, this very method of action will not change. so they would like us to come out of this , not a great power. well, there have been many such wishes in history. our task is to that, well, not to compare our ancestors, so that and after that become great, remain a great power. and this means economically financially in terms of security, yes, and in terms of moral and ethical, as it were, but including those broadcast outside, to remain a power that has the right to all this. here. actually for this right. we are now fighting. well, continuing the thought of older comrades, uh, what is authoritarianism? this is from the greek outsor creator creator, that is, one who takes upon himself the right and the simultaneous burden to create to create to create a truly authoritarian regime is a regime that is not afraid

of responsibility for its actions for its actions for its hmm for its vision of the world. uh, and let's just say it doesn't bother with thoughts of what princess maria alekseevna will say well, from the state department, respectively, and therefore iran is indeed an authoritarian regime and russia, fortunately, is finally becoming an authoritarian regime, but a totalitarian regime. yes, this is total, including total control, if we talk today about, uh, what is happening in europe this is, returning to the first to the beginning. uh, our discussion is a mention, to nothing of the mentioned stoltenberg. he was just here on the fifth of january, he actually said, well, rather, he didn’t even say it, he let it slip. e. very interesting the idea that not only war should not be trusted by generals, but business should not be trusted by a businessman. what does it mean if you translate it like this into authoritarian language from the language of the totalitarian west, in fact, in the collective west, it is already preparing, uh, to

formalize the transition to uh, the structure into the construct of total uh, hmm control is already freedom entrepreneurship. most likely it will. e. rejected as a relic of the past, how to survive already, the previous e formation, where the institution of the family is already almost completely destroyed, where there is already control over education over the younger generations. e was transferred into the hands of transnational ideological corporations of perverts and, accordingly, only some relics of that previous one remained. e, relatively speaking, european capitalism, with whom they tried to converge in the 20th century. you see there private property e big business, who is still trying. to exist outside of this established total democrat, because uh, here is mr. stolplinberg, he says that hmm russia uh, is trying to hmm protect its interests, and therefore it must be resisted in a way. uh, providing outdated martov e-bmps there, which

will probably burn well, because this technology is from the seventies of the last century. uh, there are as many as 11 british tanks and so on and so forth, respectively, they will give everything sooner or later, yes, yes, because the situation with ukraine is, in fact, a prelude to a great redistribution of the world, indeed that europe, even that collective west, already , most likely, there will not be a completely different construct and is now taking shape. eh, the vectors of what we will see over the next 10-20 years and beyond are emerging, because what is happening now in ukraine affects not only the future vectors of development and our fatherland. and the global world order is absolutely right will already take shape, another economic geography, which will indeed inevitably pull the other geopolitics and , accordingly, the outlines of the new world. perhaps the ghosts of the past in the form of an empire. e, e of the middle ages it is possible that e

will rise from non-existence, for example, e in the ta strategy is already erdogan. we are tracked explicitly. uh, the outline, definitely the ottoman empire is the same as burning the commonwealth, which requires germany to reparate for the second world war . although, in fact, between the lines one can read the demand for an advance payment for the third and, accordingly. uh, perhaps even some kind of formation of the e- polish lithuanian state. maybe there is something by including the state of the shegar four, there slovakia, that is, to collect the inclined land of belarus, respectively, russia should also expand, respectively, imperial e, a testament of a kind. it is also applicable to our country, especially since rusty, again, what is it from the russian verb to keep, it is a katakhon holding it, respectively, if we do not hold the enemy. uh, let's say at the maximum distance from their borders, respectively, this means a loss for geopolitics, and this cannot be allowed under any circumstances, therefore, here, in fact, stoltenberg is absolutely right that he really goes crazy because he doesn’t run

away . yes, if we return to our nature, but this and then changes not only political language, what we say is not only a change in political rhetoric. there are concrete steps on this planet, but for example, and how did the russian empire, well, on the outskirts there was a militia that also performed functions. for say, somewhere somewhere there were cossacks somewhere, that is, there are different forms of organizing a couple of military formations of the petersburg province against napoleon in general about organizing territory on the frontier. that is, on the frontier, this means that we must now move on to this, the pope , the burets told us to spit on what the pope of rome said about the chechen buryatia. it's not about that at all. we

are now talking about the fact that, for example, us yes de facto, what is now the fronting of the belgorod province? yes crimea kurskaya and what does this mean, does this mean? something people should know and be able to do does not mean that they should be recognized. well, this means that they must be trained to understand that if god forbid what happens, they clearly understand their place in the ranks for the day. we are recruiting, of course, the squads of the people's militia must understand that this is where, when and how they can both get the necessary training and get into line if necessary, and this means a different legal and economic, so to speak, it means economic, but something else. well, look, what the fighting showed. we have the national guard, well, you must admit it is rather strange that the national guard is equipped. well,

or let's say, he lacks what he has, for example, the musicians there, that is, the russian guard, do not have their own aviation for the russian guard. if i understand correctly, there are no tanks of our own. and probably they should have been in the iranian model. it's in the guard corps. there is practically everything solves. it's there a number of functions, which are significant, what needs to be remembered. today is just the birthday of the hero of the russian federation, who said the famous phrase, work and take. but it’s clear that now, in order to take and work, they should have every opportunity, it’s clear that the army should be getting better, but i know that i am the national guard, based on my tasks, i should also be able to provide various support there. it is clear that other forms of civil society organization are working now, and i understand very well that there, i have great respect for andrei you now i understand his holy struggle for there constitution but they say saints are

the interests of the country. they are in the interests of the constitution , so the time we had to amend the constitution yes, that is, in some kind of training , by the way, andrei is one of the breakfasts. as well as therefore let's look at what, including legislatively, i need a completely different approach to the current moment. you understand that we are leaving for the era of great warriors. well, you're talking about the border area, i'm talking about the fact that now the border will become, all of russia will by its very nature it has the longest boundary. himself not calm neighbors well, but territory. well, in one form or another, adjacent to the baltic states, leningrad is not a continuous borderland of languages, if we look at the leningrad region. what is it, what else is it? yes? i mean, well, it's not randomly created. now there districts just have to face the truth

. and when we talk there about the experience, which was, well, 100 times said the necessary information rates are necessary for the state. society must realize that time has spilled ran out of raspberries. and now it suddenly turned out that the great old people who privatized a number of people there had passed away. and the owners have now come to inherit, who hang saying they are not great.

and the state places an order and what comes up against inefficient management. and the task must be done. the task was completed by stepping on a rake. first world. well , of course. and in order to perform the necessary tasks, sometimes it acts extremely harshly, or i see it accelerates there, for example, ukrainian narratives. i have a question. why are our telegram channels? do the work of ukrainian chicks no start to publish, that is, they make it easier. they do it stupidly. quite right, but every once in a while you publish any material in a war. here's a simple question of a holy fight against

generals you don't like. you see in the interests of whom? who are you playing into? this public space is something you throw away. you are talking about the experience of the bagration operation. yes, the telegram channel would have been shouted at that time. it's all false, it's all lies. they would not allow quite right, it appears that not only every gopher agronomist has gone somewhere. oh, it shouldn't be either. the principle of do no harm in the conditions of conducting real hostilities and in this regard there is a lot to learn. fraternal belarus has a lot of things you can get. and by the way, i need to ask about your remark that it is time for belarus to

return its ancestral lands, of course, in our society all my bialystok are present. and at the same time, after 1999, after the whole story with yugoslavia and kosovo of course, it is difficult to say that there is, in principle, inviolability of borders and territorial integrity in the world. all this became very conditional. however, we probably do not need someone else's. our people are not aggressive at the same time, if you do not touch them. yes, if you do not hurt him at the same time, i would like to say that in the beautiful world of the future, i cannot exclude that, based on the current presidents, there is also a land corridor to kaliningrad through the territory of the republic of lithuania. and the road from belarus to klaipeda as a transit route for our goods will have territorial status. this is what our lithuanian neighbors need to understand. here, although their elite, of course, uh, in which case, as it was after the great patriotic war, they will simply run across the ocean. if there is somewhere

to run, our colleague academician fedorov will certainly surprise me. absolutely in my opinion, incorrect understanding of the essence of that very nostalgia for the soviet union in society. well, let's be frank. is it really about the attraction of the ideas of communism, hardly most people, uh, who talk about the greatness of the soviet union they say that they regret that time, they understand what communism is, moreover, but one office in belarus i have not been liquidated already, which existed for western grants and conducted research. and so they discovered with surprise for themselves that the soviet gene as they recorded it is being reproduced. hmm, and up to the third of the young people interviewed also talk about their admiration for the soviet union. although they

were born after its collapse, that is, there is even a kind of mythologization. in my opinion geeky not so much ideas communism. and it is not even stalin's personality that is attractive to the idea of ​​a great power, the idea of ​​social justice.

these are all the leaders. you see, they have a perception of the soviet person. this is the loser. this is some kind of foul-smelling man, eternally hopeless, working hard at an enterprise somewhere in the far north, this is a woman.