now to the one from the article that dmitry spoke by the way, our secretary of security. was there a scenario where we could not flip this board? here is there a hypothetical alternative scenario in which we don't flip the board? and yet we achieve success, it does not exist, because the only thing that i would like to correct several times was said that we play a sharper. yes, we are not playing a cheater. when when you play a sharper, you have the rules of the game for both of you known. they are identical. it's just that cheaters

dance all the time. we don't play cheat. we play with the person who sets the rules, we play with the person who actually distributes the deck himself, who put up guards in the room in case. if something goes wrong , we play. it's not even a card game can imagine that we sat down to play chess, like figu. everyone is visible, it's an open game. that is, you see other people's figures. your figures. well, you play by the rules, chess. your opponent starts playing like chess then at some point it is beneficial for him, he starts to move as a pawn, like in checkers, then , like, then they start playing the chapaevs. and how badly everything takes you. and you with a board, he says, gives you a head in this game , it is impossible to win. it's all endlessly going to be a loss, sooner or later. we had to stand up and turn this board over so it wasn't upvoted. true, there are many issues in which we are still waiting, at least at the level, and i have no doubts that not the president, not our power bloc, no

illusions, they don’t experience something and that’s all. for them, it is extremely clear, but in public discourse we always rely on this old system of coordinates, we refer to it all the time, we try to find points in international law that our opponents have buried. and it’s just that they’re already burying him there, they don’t want to hear about him. we are always trying to justify our actions. here are the existing rules. and i think that gradually over time this awareness will come to us in this state of trouble. here, i turn to your test about what we should take and turn over, you know, we took up this board. so i have a feeling and a little. so to speak, think and begin to remember. but we follow these rules. and here there will be no reproach. but here are we doing the right thing, but what they say, princess, maria alekseevna, we are still in this state as before. unfortunately, well, alexey viktorovich, we can disagree with you here. i don't agree with this because the floor has been flipped to the west and

there is no new system for talking to everyone else coordinates, therefore, in order to talk to everyone else, we must speak. we are for international law. although everyone knows that he is no more. well, international law. this is what nominally so far only nominally opposes the world according to the rules , you understand, no more. no other entity that could be wanted, i would very much like to create. just international law. it is the light of a long-dead star. well, or so, well, first of all, i have experienced the great pleasure of this security, comrades. the problem is, we don't have another 20 years to in order to start moving from these words to deeds, because when international law died in 1999, during the destruction of yugoslavia, and for more than 20 years, experts said that we needed to sort it out. this is the most international law.

what part of it do we leave, so that the aircraft, roughly speaking, flew to our friendly countries. and what part do we refuse we have to give up this difficult hard work , no one even sat down for it. no one even spoke seriously, except for specialists. and our problems. she ain't washington main problem. and not even in the fascist-occupied part of ukraine is much lower, and even excuse me, not in the constitution. yes, our problems in militant and yet triumphant impotence are huge parts of the russian state mechanism. this is precisely militant and triumphant impotence, when they explain that we cannot recognize the ukrainian gestapa as a terrorist organization, because it is a government body. and since he recognizes ukraine as an independent state with a window of the non-departmental, he wrote to her

territory with its territorial integrity, we cannot recognize the state structure of a terrorist organization; we recognize ukraine in its territorial integrity. i won't leave you a piece of paper to send it officially for a long time. who signed it? true, they are not there this summer in august, because i have recently heard the administrator of foreign affairs, they are just talking about something completely different. well, the minister of foreign affairs to say everything as it is, as it should. do you remember that a little different comes to you when you start asking questions, how asking questions comes a letter from a completely third official who says no. how could you think that we wrote to you what we wrote to you further sanctions against the dprk against north korea are still participating in these sanctions with everyone, because our enemies. we have introduced these sanctions and we are helping our enemies against our

potential friends. we are still members of the world almost said world terrorist. sorry. i am an economist of the world trade organization misspoke, although the meaning of the economic sense is the same with the official wording is that if we start to develop our economy, do it within the limits. here it is impossible, then we, thereby, will complicate the process of getting out of western sanctions. this is the official wording, maybe someone wrote the ministry of economic development and trade coincides with what the medical speaker said, he thinks mikhailovich babakov himself, i quote a letter from the central bank where it was said that import substitution leads to attraction of funds examples cannibalism can be multiplied endlessly, but this is exactly wildly them triumphant impotence, proceeding from the fact that russia should be bound hand and foot, who gaidar's

socio-economic policy of the nineties should continue and this is more terrible than the problem of citizenship. well, you can offer the problem of citizenship to the swedish traitor to suspend citizenship does not cancel. well you can. you can't do nothing. with citizenship. you can confiscate property , damn it. now now it's here this is a bright pen letter the meal is ready. now a small advertisement, so michael will continue, because people with confiscation of property. something it has such confiscation cuteness. it is very easy, therefore, the property of the constitution was arrested in our country. what sentence here was my italian property? and corporations talk about our inner truth, and then the inscriptions for children ended. ok.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. we stopped at this word antiskatsiya huge number of people generate hatred for russia abroad with russian money they have real estate here. and no real estate is rented by a vessel from russia this money for this money we are hated and cursed by our

colleagues. i really like the provision of the german basic law that the sacred proper is inviolable as long as it serves the community. yes, and when it begins to turn out to be hostile to society, it ceases to be sacred inviolable property in general. i believe that if a person not only left, he was offended there, not just outraged there, he doesn’t burn, but if he betrays his homeland with his actions by confiscation of property to hell, the mother is the same with respect to property for take rune in the countries of our enemies our hostile countries in countries that have stolen our money, that supply weapons to kill our soldiers and officers and civilians , if the firm is registered on their territory. her property in russia should be confiscated from her. do not want confiscation of a colleague no problem. rebuild in belarus work calmly on

intellectual property and calmly on belarusians have long resolved this issue. now we will talk very tough about the enemies. fine fine intellectual property. it's been intellectual property for a long time now. it has degenerated from the institution of support for creators as an instrument of fierce abuse of a monopoly position. for example, all successful industrial revolutions are based on protectionism once and the rejection of someone else's intellectual property two, starting with germany against lord 19th century usa the eighteenth century usa which english patents began to know at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries. china some and so on, therefore. uh, the intellectual property of the countries of the

aggressors, the countries of thieves, should not be recognized in russia, and we will automatically turn into a zone of free creativity, and not only software, but engineering. by the way, pavel durov proposed doing this in 1915 with respect to the crimea . you see, humanism is a wonderful thing, only humanism in relation to animals turns into atrocities in relation to people. and this applies not only to stray dogs, which they terrorize the whole of russia, this applies, including some, let's say, terrorist figures, we all have already understood that we are in a strategic confrontation with the west. everyone has already understood that the main resources are here, and the resources of this economic development of the quarry are our socio-economic policy, i repeat, as it was stamped during the gaidar, so it continues with minor changes. a

unfortunately, we need strict protectionism, that is, please, if you carry something that we do not yet produce perfectly, we we'll pay you more. but if you carry something that competes with us at least 40% of the duty, yes, this does not apply to belarus, because what we are doing in relation to belarus is that we do not recognize belarusian products as russian inside, so to speak, according to internal standards. this is absolutely unacceptable from the point of view, it seems already. well, yes, not all issues are solved by synchronization. you know, how the situations with the awards of the ler lnr, because it’s easy to recognize the awards of the dnr that were issued point no, there still needs to be issued, and so, well, it’s really militant impotence is still not there ministry of veterans well, these are wildlings, which we still do not have until now, the ministry of veterans, which would be very involved. you are the physical problems of veterans

, including those with different types of injuries, and this is exactly specific, these are separate completely separate problems, returning to the economy. we need a customs revolution because protectionism is a customs revolution. we need a tax revolution, because all of our tax systems are oriented, to their deep regret, to taking taxes on domestic production and encourage exports. raw materials are already big problems. there are excises the nazis must be made, the emphasis must have been placed on exports, the cheese must be made stubbornly exports cut off to keep in mind, we must charge large duties. cancel the tax maneuver, which removed export duties for its oil, and now removes its own for ferrous metals and, accordingly , problems with processing have begun. here it is necessary, how would we do it now, development, point breaks, we do it well.

the thing is wonderful, the mishustin government in this respect is working absolutely ingeniously. this is a point-discontinuous development here. they gave it here. gave here development should be under every bush. this is a cheap loan, which means limited financial speculation and the arbitrariness of a monopoly, because otherwise all prices will skyrocket, and secondly, this decline is restrained so that our basic industries work not for the yachts of some oligarchs, but for them to work for value added production further down the technological chain. you know it the next question and i'm afraid that people are always working and instead of thinking they start doing the next one. even if undergrowth, but this is not the point, so that the basic sectors of the economy work to reduce restrained for the entire economy. excuse me, this is the motivation of the infrequent sector. yes , i do not mind just how to do it? well, in order for the costs to be below the nationalization of 51%, what was

nationalized, and due to this, the costs? why will they be lower, because you mean that they don’t pay their owners like that from us and the soviet directors stole. so that mother do not grieve. it just seems to me that we are talking about costs here, then we need to look at everything. maybe for these industries there should be completely different prices for electricity for rent. that is, simply reduce the costs of the system. no. yes, this is systemic, of course, if, for example, you compensate them for the interest rate. yes, if we say that we need these industries to develop, so that de facto they have no length, in fact, in fact, with a profitability on assets of the manufacturing industry of five percent. available to her credit. this is 2% per annum, to which i say for everyone it should be 2% per annum, well, energy should also cost a minimum. of course, for this i

need to find in the outdoor policy, carefully identifying, tariffs and so on, as the military-industrial complex was. i spoke with people who show up there, they say that our profitability is so low and it changed so much inside that, in principle, we survived only by selling abroad. yes, and also deputy prime minister boris vsetov, that all of you are still working on bank loans, because all the profits, what they earn goes to loans that are drays and to what a and the guys say, oh well. but how do you develop? how machines are purchased. well it is necessary zhezhek, it is system comprehensive. i'm just because, to be honest, only take on the head of the owners. well , ok. there, and so the owners are completely different heads, the usual stories behind the handle of deripaskovskaya. we all remember the most expensive pen in the history of the world of mankind. handle something return but the system something in something. the soviet union collapsed, including the economic one when

it would seem that there were red directors, but suddenly it turned out that they were also very rich, and often. they are richer there, for example, it’s not by chance that the heroes of labor receive magnitogorsk rashnikov, because he invested his profit for it in order to buy magnitogorsk rolling pants - this is an exception to such exceptions to the rules, a dozen more are called i know a lot. that is simply when we speak for the system. yes, it’s also just that i mean that this system is not always a linear approach of taking up the brothers to give the state us was, ostensibly on behalf of the state on behalf of the state, but greta just created a highly efficient most high-tech company. he did something, yes, and he did well. now he came to the mins in england, to whom he bought a house there. the same minsk , which in a cunning way is allegedly wanted by us , yes, yes, everything is in order with their property in russia. do you think they're doing something right?

yes, not capital should remain in the country, and therefore in the official sphere. they closed the export of the capital to be closed. the truth must be held in the sharization of the economy and forgive one person single-mindedness, because a person has only one loyalty. yes, freshness, only the first. she's the only one. loyalty, but we have citizens who have one loyalty passport. no. unfortunately, this also happens. well, throwing a bridge to what or from what mikhail gennadievich said, according to the body for the veteran , the need is obviously brewing for the creation of temporary governing bodies caused by e, conducting a special military operation. no need to cling because of the old system of the ministry of state affairs committee. veterans here we have created a unified command. see how the situation has changed at the front obviously.

uh, the state committee for affairs, liberated and pre-front territories there. you actually act by sending authorized representatives of the presidential administration there, who will not get out of the council of ministers from there, but not to work and all of the defense committee. well, it's like a generalizing matter here, you can still talk about it, but these bodies are temporary. they will still be needed in their lives e about what we are talking about those officials who letters incomprehensible write constants. a bygone reality about those who, out of obsolete norms, make a fetish into hypocrisy around supposedly the law, in fact, their own representations of their interests and, uh, these delusions. i 'll beg your pardon, but uh, i'll quote stalin again. maybe it was once said on december 11th. well, since his constitution was mentioned here on december 11, 1937 , speaking at the bolshoi theater in front of voters, iosifovich said, you know

, there are political figures, but sometimes, political inhabitants say such people who don’t know, whether he is brave, or to be a coward, either he is for the people, or he is against the people, as gogol said not in the city of baghdad, not in the village of self and as the people say neither fish nor meat , not a candle to god , a poker, he says there are such people with us and, of course, they are around us, but a hundred. just beautiful. that's how he stated, he gave the recipe. he spoke about the voters, and he said the function of the voters is not only to come to the polls, but it continues all the time the supreme council is the pressure of civil society. it requires politicians and legislators to bring the rules of law in line with life. this society demands they solovyov kulikov morozov or

someone else this is the demand of people, respectively, the function of politicians voters, politicians and legislators to respond to these aspirations of people, and now the example of belarus, as we did once , was also mentioned here. here, let's be direct , and they're about to uh mention that there are different scenarios here. we were offered here we were criticized. well, let's remember august of the twentieth year. here we would have acted in some other way. according to those supposedly rules that the west offered us and some in moscow suggested. if now there would be no belarus that is an ally of russia , and there would be no russia, there would be a war, but not 22 years, and the war would begin much earlier on the territory of belarus lukashenka comes out with a gun, but above all, when he calls does not pick up, calling merkel, who, as it turned out, just wanted to deceive everyone and wanted to

deceive us once again. simply, without picking up the phone, but acting as it should in these circumstances, according to its own rules, as he and the people understand this, but yes, then we began to change the law. the first stage was the spring of 21, a whole series of amendments to laws and one of the important elements we spoke about. well, what kind of history do you take, we opened a case on the genocide of the belarusian people during the great patriotic war. why because we show root? where is it coming from? here's what we didn't agree on the historical truth, which we didn't assess, which let's put it straight. we are talking in the soviet union , we talked about what they said in the fifty-fifth year, bandera and policemen were all released and preferred not to recall collaborationism. well, well, there were some. well, vlasovites. that's what they called it. and what was there? who was there? here we need to figure out that these accomplices of the nazis, their spiritual subsequent ones are actually equal to nazism

and having melted historical points, we create a base for the further movement that we have written in the constitution, here they talked about ideology, the fourth article was long debated , the referendum was held in february of this year. the fourth article was written that democracy in the republic of belarus is carried out on the basis of the ideology of the belarusian state, the diversity of political institutions and opinions, but no ideology of the party of religious social groups, and it can not be established as mandatory, but some kind of national ideas must be present is a constitutional goal. literally 5 days ago, too long, he found a discussion of the president signed the amendments to the law on citizenship now. well, not only a person is obliged to declare that he has a different citizenship, a residence permit there, uh, there is definitely a question about the poles' card. there are some other documents. this is the card of the pole sent, but the state also

gets the right to deprive of citizenship. even a citizen of the republic of belarus by birth. in the event that the court passed a sentence, and his participation in extremist activities. or he causes other damage to the interests of the republic of belarus while abroad. this is the most important document. it has both a moral, legal and political character, because we give an assessment to those people who, having left our country, harm this country and try to act on behalf of our country. what is the danger of this, these russians have already run them , we don’t even call them emigration. we call them fugitives. these are your fugitives too. they are trying to speak on behalf of the russian people , which they reject, they spit on, but consider themselves some other or, as they say, good russia, and then there will be next steps and they are already trying to take. this is the creation of alternative political centers for all sorts

of new people's labor unions. this is an attempt to create paramilitary illegal formations from those who ran through upper lars, and look at the fate of the belarusian races that are being driven. now they have collected several volunteers there from outside of us, but they don’t need much of the regiment’s corps either. here they sign them there and it will be with yours the same thing needs to be assessed, by the way, the soviet experience, which for some reason is little talked about, well, they know the operations of the syndicate trust - this is a tense, constant, multifaceted work with emigration, not only along the lines, of special services, which, by the way, brought success even before the second world war and after world war ii. this experience also happened here. i think it's unavoidable. we'll come anyway. eh, to these goals. well, then yes , you need to think about what to do with the property with the property of those who cause damage, and they still own it. here we sometimes see gatherings. there are people out there. and

we know that they still own companies on the territory of belarus, of course, the citizens themselves raise the question before the state. what to do with this property? why do they still own it, although they set the goal of seizing illegal power, and you have such a situation , huh? what it says the logic of life itself will push us. uh, we started to these decisions with an article by oleg viktorovich, he was surprised. why such attention and in what sense was he rightly surprised, because he wrote what she shows us. life is an article actually a reflection of reality, nothing more. i strongly ask. and the only thing i would like to say is that oleg morozov, as an acting deputy of the state duma. i could not just write a post in a telegram, but i could prepare a draft law and put it to a vote. you would see how 400 of your colleagues of the jump would vote which of them is worth what,

all this talk about the constitution, its sanctity is that it cannot be constantly changed, that is. well, one of the manifestations of heritage ninety-first year. this is all the logic of the ninety-first year. this is the logic of the colonial country of the colony, which suffered a historical defeat in the ninety-ninety -first year. here in this logic, not you and me, but, unfortunately, many representatives of the elites and political and business officials and high-ranking officials. in this logic, they continued to live in general , talking about the rules of this legacy of all the same . damn 1991, what the hell are the rules? whose rules? well, let's turn to the soviet experience, a at the level, but such here, well, what is called memes in the head of stereotypes, which was mentioned even in legal practice, which is the most important thing for a soviet person. the law

of observance of the soviet law. we reminisced about the constitution once a year, maybe there was stalin's then brezhnev's. well, there is some kind of constitution, there is a law, there is our soviet court, the most just court in the world. this is the reflection of a country with a national sovereign consciousness, who we are and why are we for ourselves we are for ourselves we on our own we set the rules, based on what from our values ​​from ideas about our e, national expediency, huh? in the goals and objectives, all other rules are absolutely true. they were signed exactly in the event and with those reservations, if they served the goals of the world revolution in the interest of the world proletariat, well, in the end, in the interest of the socialist commonwealth, even joining the same icao was stipulated within the framework of what and why we are signing

an international treaty with the most striking example , how much it was not needed in the soviet union as a superpower. this is when in the fifty- first year, the famous speech of the same stalin is mentioned for the third time today, where he said that the united nations was created for blah blah blah blah turned into a tool. this means that the militant revanchist circles and the soviet union did not participate in the work of the un for several years that the sky fell to earth. the soviet union ceased to be a soviet union. well , in general, the soviet through east germany received the korean war to. naturally. for a political independence all 7,000 years of human existence have to pay.