we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things want and

we very often stepped on this rake, probably not worth it. here is the mental difference, it turns out to stick, as it says, listen, you have these weapons that need to be disposed of. give it to us. we recycle. we will gladly dispose of it at your home. look, i don't want this to be on our end, but if they want it to be a recycling area, so repeatedly said, maybe it's time. then it’s more serious to test weapons on

the territory of ukraine but if they are so against it, if for me all the time our territory, in general, yes, yes, i’m flipping through the maps, and maps of transport corridors or to me all the time the riddle that they continue to work here is the transport corridor, which goes there through warsaw through there through the chop through e, there are other crossings, which means they converge in lvov here, then they go further through the bridges. and here it all works. i understand that this is all goes. that's what we're talking about, which comes to donbass later, when they tell me, we don't understand, it's such a complex target brain, a simple question. for what means of defeat from it, but for a ballistic missile it is difficult and it covers the area. i'm moving towards this , but for tactical nuclear weapons, get a smaller area, but then they won't want to use it, because the territories are infected. well, that is, it is not necessary to awaken different feelings in us. you know, when

this part of the lc that was. here captured, they released it, and there wasn’t a single bridge left, of course, i’ll put up a single one now. all the bridges thought that these were the ones without problems. today you know, vladimir dol'fovich. i do not believe the sad eyes of the student, even they are moaning about the fact that their military supplies are exhausted, they have supplied and will supply more than that, i see behind this mask of sadness. in fact, the joy is great, because within the framework of his political project. everything is going well for them . they are europe from soviet weapons to ukraine, yes. uh, they formed public opinion within europe itself is the readiness of the governments of the countries of the european union to allocate additional funding for security. i think industrialists are already rubbing their hands, and politicians and corrupt officials are already quietly clicking the calculator. everything is going according to plan for them. the only thing is that ukraine is covered in blood, it sobs and cries. well, no one

heard this cry. in general, by and large , no one really cares, so uh, i think that u weapons will be supplied exactly until then. while during certain military events, there will not be a turning point of such a nature that will convince everyone that it is impossible to solve the geopolitical tasks set in the u.s. on the territory of ukraine by military means . that is, it should not be, it should not be some kind of victory, on points. it doesn't count, in general it should be some kind of a turning point, which, well, will give reason to believe that this is all absolutely meaningless and, uh, and so on. that is, it will be. why should we agree with them? so no. i say, you don't have to negotiate with them. simple and they will need agree. and why should we all need to negotiate with them, you still need to be satisfied, in any case. well, let's not have an illusion, we still have to talk to them. i'm not sure that someone will negotiate with ukraine. i'm talking about ukraine in any

europeans do not talk about anything with the americans now from the europeans now. oh, about bakhmut and solidarity, two small towns well, they will bang, there are 72,000 solidarity, there were 10,000. yes, there were only a few left who live. this is not the point, many are surprised. why for these there are such fierce battles going on in the cities that these cities represent from the military point of view, whether they are some kind of expediency or not, maybe they don’t . it’s not just that, just within the framework of this large geopolitical project. it does not depend on ukraine at all. ukraine here is simply obliged to fulfill what one needs, any territory that could potentially become russian should be difficult. it's just that when turned into ashes. we understand, you can know everything, so if you roll me to endure, i have scare it. and when we well, if this happens, being sovereign people,

how much will it move the front line. if it happens, what kind of capture of bakhmut, if we return the domino effect and these fortified areas to artyomovsky, we will go there to the operational space for a couple of tens of kilometers to really advance a couple of words, i understand where they are literacy. may i have finished here about the district's bread. so i sometimes know in telegram channels, especially in the comments , it’s not that i’m not satisfied. well, let's say so, uh dissatisfaction, one might even say so, yes, in the course of a special military operation, so to speak, they wanted to solve everything very quickly and efficiently. it seems to me that they do not fully understand what is happening for eight years. ukraine was poured with concrete the eastern part of ukraine was poured with concrete. these were

projects from different countries of different countries. they understood from the beginning that this country would turn into a field. he, therefore, these projects created a fortified area and did it in order to test, among other things, the effectiveness of these greeks. against russian weapons, this is not only a test of weapons, this is a test of engineering. you know when it comes. yes , in the sense that people just do not understand how right you are? because when we vladimir underground city, i just zabakhnulo tell you. artem you have such champagne, artemovka was, at least, yes, excellent champagne i advertise. when i served in the soviet army i went to the champagne factory, the screw was lost in the basement, what you understood there is not that it was lost in the basements, there you stop by truck on kamaz to the basement. and there , in general, at the end of the edge of military equipment, it

was not visible. you see, you have to travel for kilometers there, and are you salty all these meters? it 's just that people don't really understand, yes, but i say it again, it's the same. well, it was n’t just a war that was being prepared, as you know, the first world war sat in the trenches and whoever is stronger, both of them are great, this is a completely different war and what they have been investing in ukraine for the last 8 years, realizing that this is a direct confrontation is inevitable because they needed it and they brought ukraine to russia by direct confrontation. just from this point of view, we did everything possible. impossible to prevent this from happening, if there was a ukrainian government in ukraine, then there would be no war. they would have found therefore there is no ukraine that is not there, there is no ukrainian power. there it is these people who do not represent this country and this people do not represent, these are people

who act exclusively within the framework of the scenario of his political project, which would have been prepared under the agreement in relation to the russian federation, that's all. yes, in fact, a very important thought was voiced that some cities, they make us, as it were, special fortified areas of them, so that we are forced to turn these cities into ruins. yes, equip them into such a large firing point. in fact, this is true, because the territories that neo-nazis controlled there before this conflict. well, it wasn’t all that simple , yes, but the settlements, roughly speaking, are like a patchwork quilt somewhere absolutely supporting russia and you just come in and hear people talking over you in pure russian language without any there at all, in principle, accents, as in mariupol, for example, most people say they think you speak russian, and in russian they turned mariupol and the entire industrial potential of this city into a large caviar opening, so that

we roughly speaking our yes, and the fact that most of all for us with the maximum m-m the maximum price was paid for this and that in fact the population, but also to anger against us and these cities, for which they go for me, the most important indicator, the more the city was destroyed, the more people there actually were for us and they calculated it all in advance and the same applies to these industrial facilities. they didn't calculate. and, of course, the british. i am sure that this is their absolutely clear plan for what they have created and just the situation itself is morally psychological. what is artyomovsk yes, uh, artyomovsk for a very long time lived and lived the same dad. dad, we call him the father of alexander vladimirovich zakharchenko , who always, by the way, also sends his regards to you. yes, where is he, his dacha? i don't i know he was grilling kebabs with his family, and what kind? in general, for a donbass fighter of fortune or there, when you come to the same mariupol and you understand that you now have to

unwind from the tank, conditionally speaking, yes, there is a house where your teacher lives, because they turned it into a firing point. yes, all this was not invented by chance, and in this sense, i absolutely agree that but somewhere and on some sectors of the front. it was a dance where at first it was not us who led, yes, now we were put in a condition where e. we are faced with a very difficult choice. yes, and it's really painful and painful, but i hope that we also learned our lessons from this , but i agree that they were waiting for this war. and these, of course, russian towns, artyomask, solidarity, where it did not consider itself a population, even in spite of this eight-year hard roller of this propaganda. they still were for us and spoke in russian thought in russian and in general they read themselves russian and in retaliation for this they turned their cities into fortified areas. yes, there was a lisichansk refinery there standing guys. well, they are lugansk well, that is,

from the lc. so men are so tough. when did you return home? returned home. hometown , hometown, the bearded city had to shoot to free me. i didn’t experience a greater shock in my life when i arrived. this is the largest refinery in europe and as a result it was unwound into the trash, but the whole industrial one is the same with azov steel is the same that cannot be recovered. yes, actually i'm right. uh, 'cause when i'm the biggest shock in life, when driving in for the first time i didn’t experience it with mariupol, because yes, we were there in syria, we saw the neighborhoods destroyed there, stalingrad and then i arrived, as if there, well, i don’t know, this is a sleeping area of ​​​​my native smale, exactly the same panels there, exactly the same and see. it's like, well, it was really very hard to

go, when there is lisichansk yes, there is not a single whole building far away, of course, the service, as mariupol already looks good now. well , we will establish everything, but these years will pay us for everything. it must be a war crimes tribunal. this one the human shield operation, which was actually invented by the british, yes, they made people hostages, like a tenant, that's why the authorities are all in ukraine. if you look, it's after the operation. she is anti-christian, there is not a single christian there, no. that is, modern turchinov, there are no people for whom christianity is exactly what i am talking about, bloody pastor. and if you look, they are all inukovich, who betrayed orthodoxy and already forgot, but once. rituals were led by powder and

it is very important, it seems to me, for all of us to understand that they are fighting against us, not clinical idiots and not idiots and not hucksters, they are fighting against us. i mean, when, of course, i mean the strategic level, that is, this strategic enemy is not operational in ukraine. uh and uh to your uh, intellectual military school. uh, our adversary doesn't really change either, if my memory serves me right, before u conduct a special military operation against iraq in 2003 for a year, and more than 20 strategic, uh, scenarios were developed at the suggestion of the pentagon call, uh, they were different

offered to the pentagon. then they played several large-scale games several times. there are three left, but they went to iraq with three strategic scenarios. not one with three, they left a stock. moves it was the same thing here, that is, in fact, i think it is very important to understand, they will not announce it. it is we who must read the enemy to understand, and what kind of strategy is generally being implemented against us in ukraine ? i have, as it were, a certain idea about this. here, of course, controversial uh, but it seems to me that before february 24 last year the strategy of our strategic enemy against us in ukraine was called the ukraine bridgehead. that is, ukraine is a military foothold against russia, and how did vladimir vladimirovich formulate this? that is, this military development by the nato armed forces with the armed forces of ukraine without

ukraine joining nato is beneficial to them, they do not need it. ukraine in nato needs it outside, well, developed military bases that already have weapons. here they were at the beginning of 2018. it has been written about. well, that is e, well, the 24th. and here. hey, i'm on now. right away, right into the general discussion on february 24 - this was the strategy, but shelved, because we broke it. uh, preemptive strike. it stopped working, and then another article started working, which explains a lot of what was said today, because if they have a strategy, then many things that seem strange to us. we just don't understand the strategy. for example, western media regularly write about that. what, uh. hmm, western countries supply. uh, rubbish vooru armed on ukraine is junk, that’s all, if we consider it in a commercial vector, that they

earn money there, they dispose of it for free so that the pc doesn’t earn enough, for this they don’t fight such wars, for this they don’t wage, if there political ambitions are exactly the same the most, uh, personal strategies of specific participants, there is a zelensky baydan and so on, well, this is not enough. this is a controversial picture. it should not be contradictory, and it seems to me that there is one. well, not that the new strategic picture that these contradictions are explained. 20 since the twenty- fifth of february last year, the territory of ukraine has become for europe, first of all for nato europe, the provision of these terms has already been pronounced in different ways. eh, just didn't unwind to the end very short. and therefore, indeed, every settlement turns into ufa, because what is the point of the support strip to deplete the enemy’s forces as much as possible before he reaches the

real line of defense and look what they do with this line of defense. we are everything we see the american french troops are drawn to the eastern flank. nato is not on ukraine barbed wire fences. that is, they really form. here are the baltics and the black sea from poland to romania, you say they are real, the atlantic is so similar and they are waiting for us there and this is their real line of defense, and ukraine should be like a security zone. firstly, to exhaust us, secondly, and here the second contradiction is explained, why do we not bring the most modern ones into battle, but because they are waiting for it. they force us show everything we have to meet us there. and therefore, in fact, the only adequate reaction to this strategy is restraint to fight. yes, it’s clear that our people are saving people, so a human shield is ideal, because they created

an insurmountable barrier out of people out of our people, because, among other things, vladimir vladimirovich putin, i have said this a thousand times. he is our lawyer for him the concept of a just war. no, empty sound. i 'll tell you more about this sometime, actually. i think that the special operation will be renamed soon, it will remain its own, but there will be a fair military operation, and not on purpose. and therefore the lines of fortified areas and old weapons. the main thing is that it somehow shoots and they yes, they will begin to leave heavy equipment, but at the very last moment, because they still know that they have half a step to the edge of the abyss , what you have said many times. god be with him there with paris and london. uh, in your turn. but as for the involvement in the conflict of the nearest nato territories, poland. first of all, that's for sure,

then there is a different story, let's say, uh, the deliveries that rodion was talking about once again. well, we're all talking about it. no, once a day on streams they ask about it. we just sometimes get lazy to look. and what, and how do these deliveries occur? physical uh, we know about it, we said again that the railway network in ukraine was the most extensive not only in the soviet union, but could compete with europe. well, few people know that the so-called transitions, where they change e wheels from ukraine one by one through one of the polish corridors of attention figures. pay attention to our track goes in poland for 400 km, and there it changes. at another crossing for 50 km and comes straight to the trading terminal

and that's it. so they these echelons pass the border. well, what do you mean no? first, of course, i believe that this is not a proposal. i know that these cards are on the table of our generals and the eugenial headquarters. just uh, it's a matter of time in a war. everything must be done on time, not earlier in that everyone understands that it is on time the next day, but today they do not sell tomorrow's newspapers in this feature of wartime , because there is even a map of our our air war against the ukraine, e, says that there every strike has a completely different face of its own. yes , there are even research strikes, because it is important for us to understand. how fast do they recover? how do they do it, but there was not a single air strike. and we have

the opportunity to do this, we trained the last three, when we open the air defense, we hit. here we have this opportunity in an obvious way, and the west also knows this because it's a real hit. in fact, the first and last will be inflicted, of course, on the crane of a small offensive. and uh. actually, what is a real blow, a real blow, when we extinguish ukraine , i would like to remind you that the energy system of ukraine was built by the soviet union and the considerations of nuclear war should not have been extinguished. yes it is this. well, well , just think, we won’t beat them, so we have already beaten them repeatedly. it was they who were not directly, of course, not the reactor for ukraine's accompanying us. what is this will make it easier for our troops to work during the offensive than because, firstly, uh, we are just a man one two five days. right now, right now, our strikes on the energy infrastructure

lead to what, let's say, road transportation, loss of command and control , in order for this to lead to a loss of command and control , it is necessary that all the generators stop, of course, and that they stop feeding the generators. what am i just getting at? 'cause when we talk about one decisive blow, but i don't know no single decisive blows, which would have been won by at least one war. well, uh in the sense that the agreement of the idea itself, but the most before the offensive. we have to bring him to the level of training, but just ready for her. yes , a million nuances, of course, a million nuances. well , yesterday i asked you, i ask you, why is there still a fuel in ukraine at a time when i have to ask this problem now? you have to ask yourself what the kazakhs are to me, anyone, we

can’t gouge anything through all the terminals through which it enters. well, here are the islamic steamboats with something why do they go at all? why does a polish airfield land an aircraft? why are ships coming? we understand aircraft technology. nothing, when children's question, why does this goal become legitimate when on the territory of ukraine and when it is at sea? is she not legitimate? what kind of legitimacy is so interesting, suddenly it will be turned even from the point of view of science. this is a legitimate goal even from the point of view of international law. so, maybe we will just answer these questions for ourselves once, and then we will draw, red lines, not under ourselves nose, but under their nose. to knock down snot there, maybe then something will start me maybe, then just find out the list of interested persons so that it does not go astray does not explode interested persons should be on the table at the attorney general. that's all, see you tomorrow.

you are a real legator, a terrible feisty, who will gobble up everyone gennady petrovich or just gena the gardener of the arboretum, then your big business.

continuation of the conversation in the new episodes of our podcasts, so as not to miss anything, subscribe listen and watch on the video platform watch the substations you watch

we will take care of this business. it will be the honest detective.

frigate, admiral gorshkov conducted a successful reflection exercise. attacks from the air, tasks were worked out in the norwegian sea in difficult weather conditions, the wind speed reached 20 m / s, and the excitement of three or four points to the ship, which went into combat service last week, was riveted. close attention, not only of the norwegian military, but also of the world media, because the frigate is equipped with the latest hypersonic zircon missiles will tell dmitry petrov in more detail