i wonder where it all starts? now you will see everything manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it is best to check. and on the other hand, i look from a purely pragmatic point of view at the latest supply packages, but very interesting ones. they understand what's going on when their structures are broken down like that. they understand what is happening with these armed formations of the kiev regime. they

perfectly understand that there is something to crackle on. moreover, the beginning will crack so thoroughly that the mechanism is permanent mobilization. yes, he played a certain role, especially in the fall of 2022. well, what to hide, and at some point we looked at the significance of this mechanism, but it is not infinite. this is kiev thinks that it is endless, and our western partners are wonderful. here, yes to them. as they say, everything and health too. yes, they are irrational people. they understand that such arrangements are in terms of a net social burden on society. they cannot work, well, to the point of lawlessness, and they are well aware that a window of strategic vulnerability of their main ally, because it is their ally. the main thing is this is fundamental. i re-read the article by rice and geyts. there

's just uh, by any means to keep this ally of such idiots. america did not have and will not have any more that they are ready to give in the past fifty million countries to rent to the americans. do what you want? well, they just write. and by the way, everything that happens. this is not blinkin. it's just there. this is their line, to maximize the supply of weapons, here and now, but at the cost devastation of their own warehouses at the cost of devastation of their own deployed under tyuleniy, but to pump up the ukrainian armed forces this moment, and the window of vulnerability, but it is clear it begins. apparently, it has already actually begun, and, uh, it, uh, it may be closed with the west around the end

of spring, when the west will launch its vc at full capacity. political tasks before the west. and here, there, too, you need to look at them. the first political task, and it shines through everything americans do. this is a task to ensure the mass character of anti-russian policy at any cost. they need mass. it doesn’t matter who is there , it doesn’t matter that they begin to slowly move away from them even those countries that used to be very strong support vali it doesn’t matter, for them now the crowd is important, the crowd chanting russophobic slogans , anti-russian slogans, let them give one rifle, but it doesn’t matter quantity is important, second. they will play in the very

near future to increase the degree of tension. both informational and political field, so we need to wait for their very strong attempts hmm to shake, so to speak, our position to harm us in those remaining international organizations where we are a member, first of all, we should expect an attack on the council on our positions in the security council on our positions in relations with china and, above all, india. i think that they will actively work there. well, the last. i think that if they don’t open a second front against us, then they will try to at least imitate it through military provocations through the strengthening of its military presence in areas that are vulnerable to us. this is fundamentally important for them and in this sense, but on the other hand, ours, if you turn the coin over, well, if this window of vulnerability of the west and their strategic, as a prying ally

, the zelensky regime well, we must also use this window of opportunity, while these weapons not yet complete. they came until they were deployed, until the american european vc was deployed in this sense. i have historical optimism inspired by the statement adminisevich. peskov about what happened to kyiv regime we now have nothing to talk about, in my opinion, this is such a serious signal for the future that they poured it. but they can give all their conventional weapons to ukraine, because they are convinced that we do not use nuclear weapons against them on their territory. here, it turns out to be an interesting game, on the contrary, they consider nuclear weapons, which they consider to be a deterrent weapon. well, the russians understand that if they hit us with nuclear weapons. we will answer. then they do as they say, well then

we'll give you all the confidential weapons, including including from their armies, because the russians will not dare to go to berlin, they will destroy paris, london and warsaw, and those that we say here every time , no. no, no, you don't have to talk. what, how could he stop writing to klin with an intimate nuclear strike, do you understand what it will lead to a cleopard on our land? lack of determination under these conditions, they can rightly sweep out their double plinth warehouses right now, being convinced that we will not dare to strike at that territory. where are you going from now? yes to unfortunately, that's exactly right. or maybe they should strongly miscalculate like. but by the way, i would start not so much with nuclear weapons, but so much with creating a threat with conventional weapons. well, near their territory, at least

some kind of paramitar formations. i don’t know seasonal workers there, because we are now recalling the same episode of the battle of borodin when the raid sailed to the cossacks for a fee. yes, and uvarov, which was, by and large, paramitar formations of that time, but not in borodino, but in the slightly daisky district of moscow area, he went climbing. wave with checkers , but i would still bet on the north american continent, maybe, that's how you should think, they are swimming across the ocean. and i will say that they were already in the cold war paris it was a pity now and even more so.

regarding the fact that, first, a few words about the fact that the west can really afford to take out all its weapons, because indeed we have been convincing for a very long time that predictable partners and we will never attack in our lives, there is not europe foreign nato is really er, makes them brash and confident. and we also confirm this, for example them. uh, means statesmen down to the level of mayor in cities. here is one of the latest examples. now the mayor of several eastern european cities is there, traveling calmly around ukraine, we pretend that we don’t notice this we've been pretending we've been pretending

we do not see this, yes, but he travels to one country to another country, as if he was just talking about it. well, let's do it again. let's say yes , we, too, as it were, yes, as if we can't let it through. well, here, that means, somewhere there in we ask questions there, to which, of course, as i already understood, there, well, it’s stupid to give answers. uh, i'm just going to analyze the situation. this i understand that, theoretically, one of the arguments so far is the one that could take place here. why don't we hit them? why we give a ride is that here let's, no matter how we will touch, because we can give a reason. yes, in order to raise this tension to a higher level, but in fact, it seems to me, this is self-deception, because if they need to raise this tension, they will find a reason, they will invent it, how would they unwind it there , as if no one would appreciate this nobility of ours. on the contrary, this is the situation in which they calmly move around, they are perceived, just confirmation that they are, well, such sacred crowns that many

will not touch. that is, they see it as a guarantee of their safety. so i went, as if the president. here comes the minister. here comes the mayor. you know, we don't do anything foreign. are you saying that we don't know their trips? or we can't create at least. we can, of course, can, of course, but we don’t do the situation in which they cancel these trips or do not undertake them. for some reason. it seems to me that no one will appreciate this nobility, it is perceived as a sign of impunity, but this game know in the 19th century. yes, there napoleon wrote to alexander what they say, like? i'm already here, my brother alexander. i've already burned it in moscow. and you still don't think so. you cannot reply to my letter. i think it's kind of stupid, to be honest, yes. well, at least, it is not perceived at all from the point of view of what is called banal erudition. it's not, well, as it were, in my opinion it doesn't. uh, no really serious, uh, serious reasons, at least. one could understand by this that free movement on the territory of ukraine is unsafe, unsafe, but there is clearly something going on here. here the game is clearly not

given a command or a command is given to do nothing . i personally do this. uh, it seems to me that again the arguments can come up here. they are there for a long time many on these arguments so. they work, and against the background of this, they really do . they get, uh, varnish on time in order to let it be there, this is all any weapon, including the old one to upload there to ukraine, they will receive varnish on time. there is nothing to be afraid of, and so on and so forth, it is really necessary in this sense. to me seems to create too. eh, they have different feelings, at least that they cannot move around ukraine, and again i will not comb this eternal question again, but it hangs about transport entrances to ukraine. it actually hangs and there is no clear answer to it, because it seems to me that the political component there is very serious. here it is much more than the military, or at least, it is comparable to the military, why don't we strike, although it doesn't seem like hmm from the political your point of view. uh, it’s wrong, even from the point of view, uh, of public

sentiment here inside russia, because if people have already been partially nominalized after that, then they were called to the front there. well, listen, yes, to play these games, like we take people from here so that they go to the front, and there we will play a special policy. how can we not hurt, there, relatively speaking, there is one or another, as it were, so to speak, station or how would i not hurt us, so to speak, one or another there, relatively speaking, a pipeline plant or something, i think this wrong. that's putting it mildly, that's the mildest thing i can say, it's wrong. the second one is already, as it were, on the topic that we started with about the meeting, just with president putin and the government. uh, there is a lot of talk about whether the mobilization of the economy is necessary or not. well, it seems that somehow we have a high-ranking figure. it is said that well do not worry the mobilization of the economy will not be good do not like the word mobilization. come up with something else. think of, for example, the harmonization of the economy. come up with some more. well, for example, what happened at the meeting. this is an element of the mobilization economy. why the

task has been set, it must be completed, therefore, perhaps, some kind of total mobilization is not needed, but nevertheless, a serious restructuring of the mechanisms of influence would be necessary otherwise . about the fact that, for example, for failure to comply today, in my opinion, she came for failure to comply with the state baron order for liability is being tightened up to criminal and in that number so to speak, but personal why? well , because everyone knows, as it were, the problems that, in time, all these engines on the right and other secrets, but the time we are entering does not allow us to act in the mode of the economic model that yes, there was a place to be before that, well, it doesn’t allow and this economic model may have completed a number of tasks quite successfully, but then such challenges are built up such a challenge system that it can’t cope with, therefore, all this talk about loans, contracts and so on, it can’t deal with that mode. in what she, uh, worked before and i need perestroika here, so that, among other things , situations like that at meetings do not arise, and so

on. but if it's a little deeper, yes, it's still there. uh, that's what else is the problem: the market economy, in principle, will not be able to cope with the scale of the tasks that stand from the outside, it will not be able and enough is enough. there is no way to fool around with this. she won't be able to do it. for example, even the same aviation industry, because in fact with this the aviation industry is well aware of the situation when you strangled it, counting on international cooperation. and this is the dependence on external supplies. it generally became one of the fundamental. uh, the basis for the whole economic model. they say we will sell what we have and buy what we don't have. and so we came to the point when it turned out that it absolutely does not work, absolutely does not work. and we need to urgently solve this problem. urgently there is no ten or twenty years to solve the problem. there is no way to solve such a problem urgently within the framework of a market economy in conditions 11,000 sanctions and let's say complete isolation from the part of the most technologically advanced part of the western world will be extremely difficult. that's also waiting. and let's attract

investments, and there is no investment, what should we do then, and then we will probably do nothing, because there is no investment, and let's give a loan, and not when we cannot repay the loan. we don't have enough profit. but that's your problem, as usual in banks. go wherever you want. this will not work . it will not work, for example, with the same aircraft. uh, one of the problems now is yes, go these are the e-replacement programs. uh. hence, the average long-distance mainline passenger liners. we buy something there, what's there, we kept it there and use it anyway, but here's a whole series of disasters, well, let's say it's called aviation accidents. well, a disaster is an incident, uh, with a short-distance mainline, the so -called with local aviation. these are the antonov machines, which have now followed, including against the backdrop of cold weather, it has again raised this very problem of local aviation. for example, why do we the highest number of incidents. eh, with just cars. uh, here is local aviation, because these are old cars, because when our soviet planes, they replaced the tushkils with

airbus and airbus, as it were, and boeings about this part of aviation. they didn’t even think why, because at the end of the whole development of the country this was not included, because it is in fact a market economy. there is a concentration of the population in large cities, because it is beneficial to the banking business, and small towns are rural, the population, etc., is generally not needed by anyone. course. for example, in the 90s, we had a program for the resettlement of people from the far north, which was sponsored by westerners. why then what in vast territories, which means in siberia and in the far north, they became completely deserted in order to later make claims on them sooner or later. and if this is so, why, uh, means to build , design, and so on and so forth. these are the planes that should come in return. anton is not needed. nobody will fly there. why will we have it on probation speaking of which, there are six ten-glomerations of huge grandmas, it will not be wonderful to spin, but people will take loans. that's it, it's going to keep

spinning. planes are needed to communicate between them so that these people fly on vacation , relatively speaking, to turkey there, yes. well, and concealed, and all. nothing else is needed. but let it all fall, so yes, yes, and therefore, by the way, speaking like this, it falls on i now. it was hard to push through the program to replace this particular anushka there, an-2, as it were, and all of this whole family antonov planes, because everything is as it were, they don’t exist, and there are no more in ukraine. and even when all this was not yet free, yes, and everything was already connected, they could not help us in any way, because everything had died there, a long time ago, and finally. now it seems that this baikal plane was somehow pushed through there, it seems that it will finally be built. but it’s me, and what’s the point of what over these 30 years, and what’s really like the president said. yes, all that they predicted for us this year did not happen. but it does not mean, that all our problems have been solved over these 30 years, such a layer of problems has accumulated, which shows that a radical restructuring of approaches. it is undoubtedly needed here without

the state anywhere, that they are like this, you know, that's how you can't rake in any way. here indeed. we need a very serious rethinking of the entire model of economic development, otherwise it’s conditionally speaking, one for external dependence for another external dependence, yes. place parallel imports and all that, we will not solve this problem we will partially replace it, but in general we will not solve it, by the way, this is also an interesting problem. now got out. yes, ours, these are just one of the precedents yes , the novosibirsk court ruled in favor of the calvin klein company for copyright protection, kelvinn is funny and presented so to speak, yes, but he throws claims here and filed claims that they say he is there, this the most branded, which means that his rags are imported. uh, this one is illegal in russia. here, ah, so he thinks it means that his copyright is being violated, what do you think in within the framework of the current law , our courts are forced to rule in favor of foreign companies. this is also a question. what do you know with us we are still there with one foot, and

the other is here, these legs are moving around, moving around, decide for yourself, decide for yourself. are you still where is it still there or is it already here, this is an important question, well, the problem of the court, what can it solve? i court as indicators, this is a matter of legislation. absolutely, therefore this question to the state duma is the point, but in fact these instruments are based on which the courts may take speeches. what i mean is that here is our current, so to speak , attention to parallel imports to give rise in this situation to something that will overwhelm us with lawsuits and are already being overwhelmed. our courts will be forced to make decisions in favor of foreign companies, because such a law or, for example, another example from the same series, so to speak, yes, somewhere before the new year. so a few days. e news. eh, i saw the min numbers, so it will be. well, it's true according to the merchant, in my opinion, mincify is developing some measures that

will provide foreign. er, for companies. uh, staging software copyright protection. it's about what it's about what we're doing numbers here we'll protect microsoft's copyrights microsoft yes instead of solving their own problems menciphers are concerned that, god forbid, microsoft's copyrights won't be harmed of course, i can admit that this is yet another cunning plan, but i have the impression that there may be enough cunning plans. yes, because this plan is somehow very cunning, very cunning. maybe they're afraid that otherwise my sneakers will some secret switch hop and everything will die, maybe some other moment that you've been thinking about all these years. yes, when they planted the whole country on thin, lever, these questions. they just seem to be piled on top of each other, but now it is already important to think about not what it was then, but to rethink the position

of then and begin to act in a new way today. yes, probably, maybe some kind of maneuver is needed here, but in the forehead. maybe to be, so to speak, e should not shy away, but in principle, in my opinion. yes, we must come. a situation in which yes, countries that are friendly to us no, that is, in relation to countries that are friendly to us or companies even from unfriendly countries, without joining the station, we comply with copyright, but in relation to companies that have joined distances. we fundamentally do not respect copyright. and this is so to say, yes, yes, it contradicts somehow. uh, it means, maybe, the agreement was agreed, which needs to be reviewed. yes audit these agreements, but otherwise we will not get out, that is, the restructuring of the economy of most of the state, mobilization mechanisms, at least in important sectors, and the restructuring of laws for new times. the new time has come, as it is, so to speak, it will develop there, and so on. well, since there is no other way out, the same with the american concerns resources. i understand all the subtleties of the fact that we continue

to supply resources to the west. basically arguments. they are famous about money about everything else, but still my friends are ideal point should be so unfriendly. we should not have countries. opportunities to use our resources. otherwise , all our rhetorical questions are out of space. and when their resources run out, they will never have an answer as long as you supply them with these resources and their resources. of course, i’ll never tell you worse than that, they will build tanks from our metal that will shoot at us, they will refuel them, so to speak, with gasoline and diesel fuel, which will be made from our oil or from our gas condensate, and so on and so forth. not friendly. we countries should in the long run, as a challenge to lose the opportunity to receive our resources, no matter profitable or disadvantageous. and here we enter the clinch. here with the same market principle. here is the question of commerce. still, we're leaving. it seems to me to that orbit if you want, when you need to finally understand money, this is very important, but

if money is an end in itself. you have lost this game. that's all thought. here the baltics are choking in anti-russian rhetoric. and you can see the trade balance. and you can find out why are at least some trading operations still carried out with the baltic states, and you can find out the names of people who are the benefit of the purchasers of these trading operators, for example, e. maybe the state thought to write requests to get official information to ask how this is possible, well, then it will become just for the sake of interest. it is clear to whom the war. here, uh, and this is what you are talking about is perceived by the west, information is obtained that allows them to judge that they are in a state of complete security, of course, which means that you can do everything please. deputy

badges what kind of modesty in another sense? that's when they could immediately come in military uniform. i wanted to support a colleague of the professor about the stakes that the west made in ukraine really, after all, they could, uh, behave in a completely different way, but they are not a member of nato yes, somewhere, here we morally support them somewhere. we still somehow support them. yes, well, in the end, fit in as they fit in now and made another one. a move. yes, now it is offensive, in fact weapons. uh, provide and there will be some other things . yes. and this is all hmm shows that they fit in perfectly. yes, that is, for them

this is an important place. why is this place important? and, because stoltenberg spoke here this week , he said, well, from turkey and the nato countries there are four times higher than russian arithmetic calculations. maybe it is, but the stability of the system, as we know, from the same cybernetics, is determined by the bottleneck in this system, that is, if shane's road is determined by bottle neck, yes, and here and now it turned out that when they fit in for ukraine, it turned out that ukraine turned out to be the bottleneck for them , in fact, because if they distanced themselves from it, and they could go on and continue to portray that here we are four times as big here, we are so cool here and so on. and now it turns out that losing in ukraine is really losing to nato and now to them. now you really need to cut the last cucumber, some kind of last one, so to speak, develop your defense industry there. yes to give everything here, so this is another

tranche. then there will be another one on it. this bottleneck will be closed, and as much as possible, and our colleague is quite right, he says, there is just a chance, because this place will not stop being narrow from the fact that they patch it all the time, including due to demographic opportunities, and they really carried out their mobilization earlier, worked them out as much as possible, so to speak, but now their mobilization resource is on the verge. and as they say, we just haven't started yet still be exhausted. i am now in mariupol, i took the stage. my tongue stuck to the book, i couldn’t do anything and i couldn’t say anything, and we just became smaller. the task is

not to cause tears. the task is to call, on the contrary, strength after the concert, i asked everyone. what further plans are now recovering and returning. traitorous behavior is the difference between a man and a woman noticed then it turns out that my husband and my cat are the most intelligent creatures of orientalism. this is conditionally some kind of parallel agenda continue the conversation in new episodes of our podcasts so you don't miss anything. subscribe, listen and watch on the video

platform we watch valerians. hmm, not every person has a real admiral. i bought a giraffe from your admiral. and you? what can two old men do, firstly, who said that we are old men, and secondly, you all decided that there are two of us, and fedor dobronravov and cheburashka

january 12, a memorable date in the military history of russia january 12, 1945, the godard operation here it is the coal seam for which we are with we fight mother nature. this will fire anthracite the highest quality the highest quality. he worked in 2006 as a locksmith, not mine also on the street rye

custard. inspect and rebuild the economy in such a way that it is in demand and it is useful for russia, nato and former soviet and new nato equipment can be provided, and so on. only who will ride it, european old people or some blue ones, or what? will not travel in sizes of hundreds of thousands, yes found throughout europe yes. well, i arrived, there are 10,000 mercenaries 20.000, hiring everything guys and then who will be on this technique?