will honest detective is always wondering where it all begins. now everyone will see the producers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check. now seriously, that's when we now start to think about how we will sort out the country. we should not think about

how we will sort out the country in order to win that situation with a special military operation. to do this, we need to catch up, but i think that we will get by with the opportunities that it has, and we need to rebuild the country. for this huge global redistribution, which will be another 10-15 years and where it will lead us and in what form the global economy will be, and how we will live in this global economy nobody knows. for this, it is necessary to carry out our own very serious economic reform so that this economic system, which will be built as a result of reworking our internal restructuring, survives. these 10-15 years, and quite possibly, she will have to

isolate herself a little from what will burn around. and by the way, thank god, because if we had not been cut off from the global financial system, we would now go into crisis with them, and in a much worse state than they were in the first place. and look what is happening against the backdrop of what we should do in terms of the economy. we introduce the budget rule again. that is, again, our money will be collected in a money-box instead of developing the country somewhere with them, so that they write it again for tic-tac-toe. no , not just them. well, just not with them. where is the trillion? and where is the trillion dollars of private deposits of russian andrey sitting, either flies, or cutlets, or the budget rule or private money. here. well, i'm in the budgetary rule, er, and if there are, they will only be

carried out in yuan, and nothing else. i ask questions. i'm just not sure that i react to the phrase. here are the main problems, that the supporter of the budget rule is not in rubles. i'm just explaining this. the decision was made by the president themselves in the very beginning of the campaign. let's sell for rubles. chatted right why? well , it's interesting, isn't it? well, not even that , the main thing is not selling. not even an economist, there is a complex combination, what thinks okay, i won't. i never, but look at some pieces. the most important thing that we must do in order to survive this transitional period of the next 10-15 years is not to

repeat the experience of the seventeenth eighteenth twentieth year of the civil war. right? yes, and the revolution this means that at any cost it is necessary to reduce social tension at any cost. we need to maintain the stability of the state. and here, not only the economy, and most importantly, not the economy. we need to understand where we are going. we need to understand our main strategic goals, we need to clearly rebuild the country for these goals, rebuild the ideology, rebuild alliances, and so on and so on and so on. and why we should not have advanced very far, to be honest, we are talking about social tension. maybe we need to, on the contrary, raise it. this is in what sense to move away from relaxation. it's just that we understand social tension, as a struggle for what kind of relaxation of society, or

vice versa, we need to raise the level between the layers, as tension between the rich and poor, but here again, what is the nuance? yes? because if we start now yes, using traditional recipes for dealing with social tensions. this is the first thing an economist will tell us. cut military spending, the second is that economists. well you stop the special operation, but here are all the recipes you want you to have, but so easy, you need to suggest this one line up. economy, well, of course, well, firstly, a planned economy does not lead to the absence of social tension, because the presence the planned economy did not help save the soviet union is not a universal recipe, but the social tension was also i can about the term social tension. i want andrey to note that the problem of the fall

of the sixteenth year really swelled up, like the strongest social tension between the trade and military elite and the tsar father. here , between these two poles, there was an incredibly, serious, very tough social tension of a colleague. i propose what i said not to take apart piece by piece. each of these parts can be argued, but i'm talking about that we need to maintain the stability of the state at any cost, including. much more ideological content of where we are going. otherwise, it will be very difficult for us to survive this pepper with this one hundred percent.

very curious news comes from the un, the representative of china, prune jang dyung , speaking at a meeting of the security council on the topic of the rule of law, said the following we want to ask. and the norm means, in this order based on the rules, who develops these norms? how these rules relate to the international order we are still waiting unambiguous and clear answer in reality, we see that the so-called rule-based approach used by some strange age of the world into chaos and caused numerous problems. some countries unreasonably impose unilateral sanctions.

outside the framework of international law, it slows down the socio-economic development of countries and creates huge humanitarian problems, violating the principles of fair competition and a market economy. some countries, especially the united states, shower the technological enterprises of other states and artificially supply chains are undermined to strengthen the rule of law at the international level. we must resolutely reject unilateral sanctions, no side can exalt its domestic laws above international law, unilateral sanctions have no basis. under international law, no matter what flag they are moving illegally with such sanctions, it is impossible to hide. well, it's actually a riot on the ship. that is so directly hard and clear, in my opinion, never say a visit. damn i think that the chinese comrades. they so slowly slowly, but creeping into the

internal sensations in general, by the way, not very willingly, apparently. well, this is an internal feeling of the inevitability of conflicts in which you have to participate. it seems to me that they are starting to mature more and more. here it is without any articles there. it's just that i have this feeling . uh, now about you know these articles that really they are all that important. yes? and that is, for the most part. it seems to me that all these opinions are sewers from someone else. it's nothing changes. just like it won't change anything. that's the whole story with documents. and so to speak , the calculation is that somehow it will split the american society. will they change, will they collapse now. this is naive, after all, the idea must be given its due, here's a byte. he's like we sure, he's so good, it's a

target for all sorts of jokes, but he's not a stupid person, of course, and he's very cunning, very cunning. and this is like a director with him, so to speak, just in the face there is this. so, in general, some basic feature of a person is determined in old age. you know when you were young faces, they don’t carry themselves, they don’t carry themselves these final features, but in old age you can see it, he is very cunning and, as they say, in theory, she is the entire american elite, despite this republican. well, that's right, as marxists, they have a class interest. it is a common class interest for them, and this does not in any way change their own there. in this sense, interests. of course, we must pay tribute to them, they have achieved a lot to date, they have achieved a lot in relation to us. and i've

talked about this before. but recently i heard mr. patrushev, the same one , said that for me the authority that, for example, a hasty withdrawal from afghanistan that seemed to be a defeat was part of the plan. them. i had to leave. they were ready to , as they say, like this, with such problems, like, because they were really preparing for the situation in ukraine. if they were in afghanistan now, they are right. they would set themselves up, we would have a lot of opportunities to salt in general, so it was all part of such a well-thought-out the plan is that we are lamenting that we were deceived. well, for them. i think it looks. well, let's just say, mildly naive, but, most likely, funny for them, this is the norm of life. it 's okay. this is fine. it's like playing poker, strictly speaking. you're cheating, you're bluffing, of course you're cheating.

is it funny if you complain that you sat down to play poker and got scammed? well, you have been deceived. well, you will be able to do it more, as they say, exquisitely. so you won in that sense, that's the point, really. we have talked about this civilization a lot. she's worth it this part of business is part of part of history part of internal self-awareness, therefore it is easy for them and there is no doubt that they will continue to develop this situation. it is beneficial for russia that ukraine be at war. them. this is beneficial to them. it is necessary. the longer it lasts the better, so installation. they have one that maintains this one in such a state, and in fact they do not need the victory of ukraine because it is also fraught with it. nobody needs it. why the victory of ukraine well, hypothetically

to ukraine won. she almost notices poland, and this is not necessary, because ukraine is not reliable anyway. they don't really need it. we are like this right now , i think, the final defeat of russia is like this, so that it falls into chaos, in fact, they probably don’t need it either. i think so, if they think it through, everything is so far, in what? by the way, i’m not sure either, because history is still life, it’s more powerful than all kinds of these, but in any case , it’s beneficial for them that this conflict lasts like more as long as possible it weakens, of course, we are doing great damage to us. er, respectively, so it weakens and china since. he is hypothetically our ally and it's quite possible that the chinese are already beginning to realize this seriously, so from this point of view hmm, i don't think that any will interfere with them. they consolidated the entire

west, and they consolidated it here, of course, we need to deal with ourselves in this sense, it seems to me that i listened to the program yesterday, as always. yes, when i do not paint, i always listen. it seems to me that sergey aleksandrovich mikheev is, so to speak, the right image, - he said. he says, we stand with one foot. we are with today , and with that foot in yesterday and here in this sprawling position we are, we need to solve something with this. i would say another one. here there is such an image, more, perhaps , mundane, we remind you that the husband is kicked out of the house, they have already kicked him out, but he just can’t leave. he stands in the hallway all the time and, as it were, as it were, everything still hesitated. their. well, you can understand him, he has 20 years. he lived here, he had slippers here, his favorite toilet, his favorite book for her is to say the sofa on which he used to sit there,

say to lie, he has a view from the window, well, of course. it's hard for him, you don't understand that you have to slam the trees. well, not well, listen, we understand how it happens in life. here is the same thing happening. it seems to me that with russia, you know, this should be staged, as an actor explains something to present the names, here is the door, here. knows what to clap and there is no other way. you need to stop slamming the door to leave and build another house, moreover, a new house and already build it in a new way already with new slippers with these new ones according to your plan, but not like him, and he can’t get out of this state, you know, here , i'm talking about the family correctly, lord the devil says the details. i'm watching the throwing of our football union well, everything is there, i read there the

wonderful newspaper mk moskovsky komsomolets they have a whole series of reports. it 's very interesting, in general, it's like that passed now past the main thing, but before the new year. it was necessary to make a payment to stay in uefa or not uefa, which does not deal with them at all, or it is not so easy to leave for the asian federation, where they were told, in principle, perhaps, well, we have a vote. we can't tell you so unequivocally that we will perceive it all the same with our eyes. but japan south korea will vote. no one knows, this is dima, this is in fact, no one knows, this is unknown from there. it is obvious here that we will not be allowed anywhere. here obviously ifa under no circumstances will we be allowed to play. there is at least some hope there, at least some hope , there are many countries that

support us, there is nothing here. and as a result of these i read. they decided to say so anyway. no, we don't leave. i do n't blame them. i understand the inner state of this husband who lived here. well, how to get out of here and paid a fee paid 250,000. it's 250 francs. no, they paid 250,000 euros, i trust the moscow komsomo. in this case, they paid the face more 250.000 euros contribution for this year and my face said, well, we will collect a commission, we can understand that it was technically paid for this priba. how are you, do you pay dues? i can’t imagine this, because you don’t have such a zoshchenko. such old bolsheviks. yes, i absolutely do not suspect that there are functionaries of the e-football union in not

patriotism. i'm not talking about this, i understand that i understand, this is an internal state. this is what it is actually present in the african union let them go like this, and this is the internal state, because we are faced with the fact that we have been completely expelled from europe, we have been expelled from europe, but we can’t reconcile ourselves internally, but guys, this is a problem for me too. yes, i will not, i also grew up in a certain way. e culture, where western culture it has great value, what to say? but i think we should slam the door. there is no other way. if you do not want to stay in the hallway all the time, so that your ex-wife

throws these at you all the time, as they say, will you take the money? well, you have to go and i need to build a new house. it must be built after the door, i agree, but just to clarify, it's just 250 swiss france, you understand? i don’t know, then it’s necessary to clarify all the same in the moscow voice of kazakhstan, according to the building, the payment under the section at the end of last year self-identified 250 swiss francs for about 19 years. let's put this aside before the nicotine is lost to me so we can mislead the audience. this is this exercise. simply from the fact that it is necessary and necessary to build a new house. we must then have the opportunity in any care from former house. this, of course, is always a disaster, but it opens up a huge

opportunity. you can finally build the house that you really want and can, but in this sense, i absolutely agree. with andrei , whatever one may say, well, of course, the economic model still needs to be changed, and the point is not that it is impossible to return to the soviet system . no, it is this one, but, but, of course, it should be, in my opinion, to a large extent, what is called the socialist model , of course, and it should have a planned element, of course, with the presence of a market. this is all hmm more than i know. how to work in the market and i think this is the right market, but certainly in some areas, and we can't do anything about it, because we need to plan. that's what we are with this story with the lord mantur and our president, this dialogue just confirms what needs to be

planned. after all, in principle, we are talking about what to plan. there is nothing you can do about it. already in areas such as heavy industry. tank, defense structure. this is clear that this is why this solution is necessary for myself. finally accept. it is necessary to slam the door and say, yes, everything with this wife is more. how do you say goodbye and never and never? i'll build a new house, find a new wife, maybe two, and everything will be fine. oh , it’s very difficult for me to continue this topic, because on sunday it will be 40 years since i signed with one wife and live with her and continue, therefore, as a new wife. or maybe the usual

ones don’t really bother. i go, uh, gershon's heromorabi, which expired in the nineties for 1,000 years, was subject to the jews, and the yemeni remained so, but today, again, there are, of course, certain technological difficulties, but i support your idea. the idea of ​​finding a new

wife, or even two, is very close to my ethnic historical, but i will live with mine, because this headache of two wives is still to pull. are you one? endure, and she is you and now e high. in principle, well, as it is built, we are always talking about something , discussing how to live and dialogues, uh, changes in the economy, but there are some goals. the socialist economy is not the socialist economy itself the socialist economy in history was in ancient egypt at the pharaoh. he is definitely all in state workshops. pharaoh distributes the benefits and preserved absolutely exactly. there are, of course, priests. well, they eat and

pray periodically. true, they overthrow the pharaoh, so we play capitalism with words. socialism, let's take a simpler look at what is happening. the task of providing production workers. stupid questions. when a task is set, for example, the state yes , it is necessary that a certain number of aircraft be produced. there for whatever reason to issue a loan. i need tanks , planes, they just unscrew it and that's it. why do you need a loan?

the task is not to cause scoliosis among him, the task is to cause, on the contrary, there is an automatic machine after the concert. i asked everyone. what further plans are now recovering and returning. we have a big country, and as long as we are together everything will be fine. and as a woman, i've noticed that my husband is the most intelligent being on

our podcasts. not every person has a real admiral. i bought a giraffe from your admiral. what can two old men do in the first place, who said that we are old men and secondly, you all decided that there are two of us and fedor dobronravov and

cheburashka the leadership decided to develop an atomic bomb , sobered up the aggressor heads the people, thought about how to

use it for the benefit of humanity. and now she has already given tokens on the ground. soviet nuclear power plant. the further we move away becomes his figure.

now i am studying in the cadet corps. i i plan to enter the academy of the investigative committee and work. it was his dream to study in the cadet corps for these children, because they are in a difficult situation, there will be no critical situation, that is, we will not be in an ordinary school of life.

i will answer with a historical example. great-grandfather was a major pre-revolutionary businessman patronized the late love slave supplied everything in the city of yekaterinoslav much before zelensky was born on this earth. well, the revolution came. as a truly effective manager, he was issued in management of the bolsheviks, urban coal depots, because, firstly, he knew how.