uh-huh there is no doubt about it, and we are already doing it. and this is felt not only by the soldiers and mercenaries of the countries in the ukraine, the soldiers already feel it on themselves and their other mentors. and those who consider themselves the leaders of these most western countries are still relatively calm only mr. biden, and because, as usual, he thinks that they will serve time overseas. these guys can’t sit out anywhere, but they don’t sit anywhere, you know, history. it is repeated twice once in the form, a tragedy, the second among farce. this is the farce. they will scatter like rats when the smell of fried with all this parliamentary expression about baking. so the stink will gather and take turns in shouting, on my order or in

it's order. to the one who is stronger russia is strong.

sergei alexandrovich yes well, first, as regards the plans of the americans and the europeans there. yes, it is quite obvious that the americans do not need any negotiations, and they

rely on dragging out the conflict, and, uh, the simplest in this sense, so to speak, the options are the development of events in an inertial scenarios. and then they need, for example, say, six months a year in order to further increase the production of their own military equipment. there to supply the ukrainian army with even more modern weapons. on the one hand, on the other hand, to sum up the situation at the front as much as possible for us. maybe try to go somewhere to the entry. third. really. we need to start more, as if disturbing us already on the territory. the main one, what is called yes, and push, for example, let's say the russian authorities to more one wave of mobilization and to another and another . why in order to reach the situation of the twenty-fourth year, when there will be elections, so that a at the front the situation, no matter how brilliant it would be here inside the country, is more and more. more mobilized means more and more pressure on public opinion, and on the economy and you on the outer perimeter, we show that we cannot solve this problem. yes, the way out to the situation of the twenty-fourth year, regardless of whether you want to or not , but some elections for this

the succession of power must take place or the way. he will remain or some kind of successor will come and in this situation try to rock the situation here, and destabilize, destabilize the socio-political, so to speak, situation, as it were, and can achieve his goals or try to do it, yes, or a change of power, or on something else, that is, it means that the inertia scenario for the americans is the most profitable and the longer this will continue. yes, in such an inertial social, those are better than more, as it were, yes, we will allow ourselves to be drawn into this situation, including from the point of view. there the same mobilization, the easier it will be for them to influence the situation within the country. this is quite obvious, and hence the opposite conclusion also follows. we need to finish or at least demonstrate some success. there, in the next year , a maximum during this year, yes, well, certainly completely reach the twenty-fourth year with what can be presented as success. will it be putin who, as it were, will remain with power or will if someone instead of putin still does not matter. eh, so, yes, some kind of presentation of success , a representation of what can be unambiguously shown how success is a very important very important condition here, so either we

, roughly speaking, really break the inertial scenario. uh, and uh, so we think non-linearly, as if, yes, maybe even risking somewhere here, although to be honest, i still have a hard time believing. here, well, again, i say so, no more than i am. it's just what i think and nothing else in fact, in this inertial scenario, we will have to make some really very serious efforts in order to show, at this current pace, at the current pace, that, well, we are solving these problems. it won't be easy either. that is, are we really breaking this script of someone else's script there, as it were, or are we still going on the chips. and now we are still following their chips. let's be honest, and for these chips, actually the americans, really. you can play long enough. actually don't care. they wanted this europe , they didn’t want to give a damn about ukraine even more, the more. ass to spend money, uh, means to put your weapons, the more it will depend on the americans. this, in principle, is obviously a very good option. that is, if it is impossible to completely subjugate russia or if it is impossible to completely destroy russia, then, uh, then, uh, at least partial isolation in

order to, as it were, to unsettle this russia to the maximum and out of the rut, in principle, it is important to unsettle russia and points of view china yes, because if we look at what is happening to the far east and see the following situation. there are quite a few on your program, including vladimir yes, we are talking about the revival of european neo-nazism or nazism, obviously, and this is being done clearly by the americans. look what's going on there they're resurrecting japanese militarisms. this is quite obvious. now the g7 themselves will be in this hiroshima, by the way, the venue itself, this g7 itself , is, of course, an age of cynicism. let's, like yes, on the bones of those whom we burned, they say the americans will agree now, she died in order, and judging by indirect data, again. i don’t know anything, i’m just observing the situation, then according to open sources, and japan will be serious. and to turn into a real military power, all these here, so to speak, nonsense about the fact that she only has self-defense forces there, all this will be left behind and we see the following situation of the bite block, the anglo-saxon times the remilitarization of japan, two

militarization and radicalization at the position of south korea - 3 retraction india's attempt, by at least in orbit e. orbit means american influence four. by the way, yesterday, for example, let's say. uh, in the news came along with the news of a possible change in the laws of japan came the news of japan's first indian military aviation exercises in japan under some sort of different cover, so to speak. it is clear that there is only salvation, as if drowning and nothing more, but nevertheless retraction. this is the advantage of southeast asia , with which, as you know, china has traditionally not very good relations. although it is clear that it is southeast. asia, too, as it were, she conducts her own policy. well, look what happens. yes, it turns out like this, so to speak, a half-grip of china with ticks. yes, and then setting some certain conditions. together with the transfer, as it were, to the production that is in taiwan, e, to this in the states gradually. here's another couple of four years, how would they close this ring. although i have big doubts about india, but they will try to do it. and if from this, how would we suppose

remove russia, then, it turns out an absolute ring or an almost absolute ring of china, china's problems are solved, therefore, of course, yes. definitely absolutely they will continue the pressure here. ukraine is generally, of course, an ideal option. uh, it means that she provided herself with consumables for this. many times they talked about this, but even there in the far east, uh, things like that, so to speak, are also quite obvious in this sense. by the way, why should americans learn. so this is an incredible continuity of foreign policy. yes, they have presidents change there. we are here, so to speak, yes, which means we are discussing with enthusiasm the democrats, republicans, republicans, democrats, nevertheless, in recent years. 100 their foreign policy has not changed at all, unlike us, unlike us, we have that they are a new leader, then some kind of new idea, so to speak, what? any new like friends leaders or entourage again? here, let's see this side , let's in this. by the way, now i'm also interested. here we also remembered, but the dates are about the chinese. yes i would i remembered, for example, in this sense, how nikita

sergeevich khrushchev, so to speak, congenially in quotation marks, destroyed relations with china. and what it cost us. in fact, it was a very serious defeat. yes, and now there is already one who is often quoted by us. remember this ping-pong diplomacy, like, yes , table tennis matches and that same kissinger, so to speak, travels. uh, in china, as it were, yes, they have achieved a lot. this is what i mean about the sequence of politics, they drove the wedge in and will shoot down. i remember here at the beginning 90 there were even some articles they say. let's offer ourselves to nato for what, in order to become an instrument of pressure on china, who threw these thoughts? well, it’s clear from there, then obama and his american family. now something else is up. yes, the weakening of russia, the girth of a semicircle, so to speak, further the withdrawal of production and further and further you can do this and then you can do whatever you want, so how much we are, yes, again, so to speak, not americans, nevertheless, it costs some things learn, the enemy is serious. yes, there is something worth learning. see how they would set themselves the goal of global dominance there. so it means, intently absolutely, as if they are persistently going, how they achieve this icebreaker. yes, something didn't work. i personally believe that

historically they will not lose the question of at what cost and when. yes, this is also important to understand, but nonetheless. yes, presidents change, parties change, but the priorities of foreign policy are national interests. they are not questioned, they are not constantly inventing some new different ideologies that it means they put everything on top, they say upside down. well, now everything will be different no, now everything will be different no. now we will once again turn everything, this thing upside down and now it will be different, as it were, yes, we are such dreamy people to fantasize, however, in the meantime, as if there are permanent national interests that they have for centuries they don’t change at all in russia and they simply don’t change in many other countries , regardless of what you are going to build here, how you are going to, so to speak, that’s all, but to design and so on. this is the external interests practically do not change. this, i think, is worth a lesson for americans. and as for, as for their persistence, uh, in attempts to somehow weaken or destroy russia, to isolate uh, yes, they will continue. and here and here we say, of course they are linear answers. but

to be honest, how would it be, yes, to bring things to the point, uh, to the point that we go at each other to rams to wait, who will turn away? well, you know, i think it will be we will be on the verge of total collapse, that is, it will be it will be the death of the entire planet art art politicians. still, with all due respect , it's not about that, but about actually, maybe not linearly, but solving the situation in such a way that you don't have to think. and who will turn away at the last second, because it means, so to speak, actually balancing on the verge of complete right and complete loser, and not only from one’s own, but from the whole. what is called civilization, so the question is how to solve this problem, maybe even tough, maybe even quite radical, but with all this. avoiding no premiere, you know i don't in the wrong position, what is called the question is not in uniform? yes, to put it this way, when , maybe, you should have asked, no one asked, but about ukraine, including, because no one planned to ask, right, because they thought

they knew everything, but also wonderful. yes, that is, uh, roughly speaking, options on options can be worked on. uh, roughly speaking, so to speak, our minuteman against your poseidon, as it were, we’ll see now, relatively speaking, who can handle it, maybe this, but we all must understand that this extreme option, teetering on the brink of complete destruction of the planet. the land of the art of politics, of course, is to find a solution without leading to such situations. although as an extremely trump it is necessary to keep in your pocket beyond any doubt. what, by the way, was discussed here, for example, let's say one of the steps. say what's there, yes, really lead to the doctrine. for example, the possibility of a pre-emptive nuclear strike theoretically we can do this and a decent doctrine theoretically, but to emphasize this possibility, yes, they talk, right? burn her, why not. let's try try. at least such, too, to say, at least such approaches. well, there are many options, again, there are people invested with power, so to speak, with wisdom, what is called yes? if it is necessary to

consult, so to speak, well, we will advise something, no, if we are ready, if anything, we are immediately talking about the same thing, sergey, i'm not talking about the fact that this blow will be dealt these theoretically, maybe be inflicted, of course, no, i'm talking about the fact that we will be brought to the point that we will directly say. how are you say you leave us no choice but preemptive strikes. yes, this will be it. well, it will be early anyway. that's exactly what you say, but they have changed. maybe , but it's all the same here. well, we need, so to speak, such moves are not trivial, because this move, to be honest, is also trivial. yes, it breaks logic. he's pretty predictable. well, good. let's propose. let's be happy now. would you see that yes i can offer a few. please announce the creation of an anti-imperialist coalition hold a congress to include, that is, talk with the chinese comrades north korean comrades iranian comrades latin america african

countries and present on the battlefields both the equipment of these countries and the fighters, that is, go to the broadest front, while exerting pressure and assistance along the entire line of confrontation with colonial forces africa latin america far east we are trying to test these options, for example, there russia china india russia china indonesia russia china turkey you are trying to test these options. but i think it could be done more actively. and the main thing was to start earlier, so that's not the point, but you still need a father. here venezuela, for example, gives us this feed. yes, when she says, we are ready to unite there. we are ready for africa to give us this model. north korea at least they did something for north korea, we lifted the sanctions, for example, raised them from the general on the spot. give the north no sanctions, china is good. understand? what the longer we parse western weapons in ukraine tyumen what is it western weapons will pop up. you can talk like that in general , but they also see a threat to japan and

understand well that it is against them, and august understands well that it is against them, which means that here, too, it is necessary to go into the system of relations. in the sense that we have in many in many, so to speak in the branches, what is called knowledge? there is such a situation with one foot. in the past we are already alone in the present, these legs are moving apart, yes, then they are moving here, when they move completely it will hurt well for you to group, that is, there are many options. well then, here, here, when the impasse was western countries that have what to lose the same china too, india will not understand this. what kind of sanctions will be imposed on them, in which, in some story, who have nothing to lose, like iran. so we work with them like this. no, it’s close to work with them or we don’t work enough. there is no reason why we don’t have here, while we have a nazi bitch on the border there, we don’t have iranian fighters, for example, in syria we fought with our shoulders. why can't you call here? we don't have any grey-cary fighters? we do not have we do not have representatives of the country dkb,

i mean, well, represented by military formations. even if it's medical. well, yes, at least some help from the rear. we can do a lot of things. what can we, for example, greatly spoil. that's all these european. er, to the nazis on the african continent, we have many options. there are always options to say so, yes, china is watching, what they themselves are doing is well aware, we will be sorted out by sanctions anyway. they understand china well the sanctions against them are already underway the chinese side, thinking categories of 5,000 years of history, of which 4,000 years are written stories. this is what they want, so they think, but they really are, well, they all convinced of this for the last dmitry, they all of this convinced of this to their success. they had gigantic miscalculations, from which they draw one of these conclusions, that, well, let's say great military victories are not china's strong point. yes, based on this, why don't they find those who will

gladly fight for them along with them. so we can already help. he is irresponsible journalists yes, they are not even journalists allowed. kerrifying i'm here i remember were such conflicts in our history in the soviet i as an old scoop. i remember their fifty- sixth year, hungary, in principle, everything seemed to be there, but it never even occurred to the west to interfere in these matters. and why was it, moreover, in the fifty-sixth year? i think the soviet union was weaker than america, even before the caribbean crisis it was much weaker, of course, the army was powerful, but even in the sixty-eighth year, there was still no nuclear parity, by the way, but nevertheless, it didn’t even cross anyone’s mind came. they shouted there, so it didn't even cross my mind get in. you know, it was

some kind of soviet union, no matter how crazy it was. everyone understood what he would be, but he was reckless. yes, it was a reputation. a country without a ba- here's how i can say bad good, but they were afraid of him, they were afraid of him, because he didn't send a telegram. he could, he used, he used adequate all the time, as they say, these are after the ninetieth year, as they say in russia there is no such reputation , she, as it were, sends a telegram all the time. she , as it were, taught this and this all the time. this feeling of fear was lost, no matter what they say, what kind of daggers we have, they don’t have this inner feeling. this feeling has already grown up a generation that doesn’t have this feeling. oh, and then it was even i remember, i was there for the first time and came there somewhere years ago

then to say this to me the royal lady came up to me, although the festival was there. you will not bring tanks into switzerland well, with such, that is, they lived with them, as if with this inner thought that we will certainly bring tanks somewhere, and we will definitely do it. it is decisive and without any complexes understand? i, uh, what else am i talking about, of course, here, if you look at this situation, you know, like in a museum, here you come to the picture, here you have 5 cm from the picture. that's what you will see the brains of some kind of chaos, nothing is incomprehensible, incomprehensible. well, what if you leave, maybe some kind of flammable figure. that is, it is necessary to move away so steps, if a large picture of steps is five to ten, yes, so that it suddenly arises. do you understand this is the last day? pompeii or bears in the forest bumps, well, as it were, as i understand it, here we are in the same situation now

we are, in fact, our leaders. in fact, all leaders. they also stand 5 cm from the picture. of course, they apply some strokes, but the full picture will open up for us. only after some time, well, some signals from the other side, which also cost 5 cm, but the signals of their vision are coming. for example, i drew attention to today's inconspicuous. in general, trifling, it seems, is the european commission about flights. so the european union commission on what e russia will have to do when so it will be said already, like, once the sky will open russia should stop paying, as it did in soviet times and the soviet began and throughout this. and when aeroflot received from us, it’s really not clear with such huge money. why we had such ticket prices all this time is another

question, but, in principle, what i mean, what is this? well, it would seem some kind of stupidity guys, there is a war. there is nothing else at all known to the fool. it seems, it is clear that there will be no prohibitions on flights and suddenly such a statement, and i thought, what is it, but this indemnity is already part of only a tribute, and the smallest part, the most, as they say, the most insignificant you, we will fly through your space for free. you will give autonomy to all your districts more autonomous. that is, you are there, uh, will you trade at those prices for oil and gas, at what we tell you? that's it , that's it. this is not to mention the fact that all your thieves will be. you yourself will sign that you will hand them over to ukraine and you will to pay. and there will be the fifth tenth of this one, and

of course, all lgbt laws will be implemented here and you will have to comply with them. it 's all here, it's in this, yes, seryozha, where is the nuclear button, and the nuclear button, where is it better to burst them then on the window. well, in principle, it seemed to me that in this small message, this one, or this one, is already a contribution. they are already preparing for this and so am i. and how valery andreevich advised us to tell the president anything, i don’t want to absolutely yes, she doesn’t need it, but i think i should speak out. i i think it is necessary and i think, by the way, thanks to the fact that here and in this audience in particular, not only in this audience. many journalists. analysts spoke out, many were generally correct decisions. as stated under the edited mobilization. if you remember how it started. and how much the same margarita

on this occasion soloviev and mikheev said here, and so to speak about the supply of the army and all kinds, as they say, things that irritated public opinion, and many things were heeded to this. still came back to normal. so it's our job to speak out, and, of course, it's the president's job to make a decision not to take one, and he proceeds from his own, we respect that, that is, to this right. well, here i am. for example, i have never been one of those radical citizens of russia who believe there that they deny the right of the ukrainian people to be called an independent people, kindred, close, but independent, or even a question of statehood. it seems to me that in any case, it should save ukraine. well, anyway, i don’t belong to such radicals who, of course, we have, but it seems to me, maybe the

situation is such that it is necessary after all. demonstration of a ground-based nuclear test. this is the way out of the treaty, for example, i think this is a test. it seems to me, after all, this moment, because the situation is getting closer and closer to the war, but it really, but, but remind me because , in general, it is very effective, i still remember well when i was a child, when they were held , all this was shown, and all over the world it generally acts oppressive, oppressive it acted. just the fact. that's all you're watching, and you understand that everything is over, but this world has forgotten about this world. i forgot about this, but i must remind you that it may not be necessary to do this with some kind of top there, well, as if visually, the image should be understood. in my opinion. this is better than if it comes

to the real use, so to speak, of nuclear weapons and all the churches and others and others of these. at home you see, to some extent, it seems to me that this may somehow cool this one in general, but these are people. they don’t remember, they forgot. they they don't understand. they are sure that this will not happen , they are sure that this can be achieved in another way and it is possible, as they say, to deprive russia of nuclear weapons in another way. this is where we get in. that’s where these laws will sit down slowly once and for all, as if they will agree, as it was in the ussr, so it seems to me, i’m not suggesting. it's just my opinion that i repeat my opinion of a very non -radical and tolerant person, but it seems to me that this is the moment when this is an image, because the image is very important,

returning to the image of yesterday. here too u we have everything in our country is palitative. here she is in two. the property abides

it will be honest. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and

most importantly, but it is best to check. yesterday i watched, as always, your program caught the idea with interest here, let's abolish the intellectual property of

western cinema yes. yes, in fact, the program of computer technology is always because you cancel the other thing here, and what will we have and so the whole television is filled american cinema. this will be all over for us . it is simply totally surprising that we are not asked the question that let's increase our own production 350. a lot of what was right, give back in due time. the soviet union did this after a period of few paintings. in the sixties, the soviet union produced 15-20 paintings until the sixties sharply