vladimir putin today held a meeting on economic issues via videoconference, the president began in summing up the results of last year, noted that the forecasts of those who hoped for a weakening of russia did not come true, i will start with some of the results of last year in the russian economy, as already noted, its actual dynamics turned out to be

better than many expert forecasts for assessing mine development, but colleagues will still say russia's gross domestic product for january, november 2022 decreased, but only by two and one tenth percent. whereas remember yes and some of our experts in the country we have inside. i'm not talking about foreign experts great falls of 10 and 15 and even 20% in general, the weather is expected to decline by 2.5%. let me emphasize. uh, hmm, this weather in general, while already in the third and fourth quarters, the growth of the economy is recorded. true, compared with a sharp drop in the second quarter. our task is to support and consolidate the positive trend. this is a positive trend, i note that many of the

most important supporting industries such as construction, agriculture industry. so far, of course, some others for the last year not only did not reduce, but, despite what we have already said many times, the unprecedented external pressure was not reduced, on the contrary, they even increased it. created new jobs, which largely helped to maintain stability in the labor market to achieve a reduction in unemployment to the lowest level in recent history. vladimir putin stressed that it is necessary to assess the risks facing the country as realistically as possible. 22 was a very difficult year for us and we managed to get through those risks that arose

largely unexpectedly, but we could now not talk about the details. there, perhaps, it could have been better, as usual, on the whole , all these risks have been quite successfully overcome. and now i will say the most important thing, then the details already. yes, we roughly understand what risks we will have in 23. that is, at 22 we did not know and did not understand them, and yet, we went through them. financial budgetary there uh, that means structural logistics. well, and so on and so on. we've been through this let's here. uh, not realizing that they would act, as it were, so that's 23 years old. we see better in terms of these risks. uh, technological risks there are the same infrastructural and

unsurmounted risks, that is, we understand what is happening and what is approximately. eh, what difficulties will we have? and of course, if we understand this, then we should be running this much more efficiently even than what it was in the twenty-second year. here, too, it is very important to objectively assess all events. it is very important not to overestimate or underestimate anything. namely, it means not to exaggerate, but not to underestimate. eh, it's important to calculate everything realistically. of course, it is important that the president paid special attention to the defense of our enterprises, which are now working in an enhanced mode. a great contribution to the dynamics of the manufacturing sectors to industrial complexes has just been mentioned over the past year. it has gained serious momentum and continues to increase the capacity of the enterprise working in several

shifts. no, some practically round-the-clock responsible work means it in the west they do not hide that they will fight with russia to the last ukrainian, until others go later, at least the pentagon hints at the supply of long-range weapons to strike on our territory no longer bothers anyone, the head of the european commission, without hesitation, announced a new goal for a decade to plunge russia into recession and deprive it of the opportunity to develop for this, in their opinion all means are good. even those in use who were usually trying to unite us now, it turns out, ukraine is doing well, because it wins the information war thanks to fake outright lies and the creation information, but the main thing is to teach russia a lesson on the battlefield. there inside. we

need to provide ukraine with the necessary tools so that it can continue to repel the russian aggressor. actually. we probably could have foreseen a few months ago that ukraine would need air defense. so let's work proactively and give ukraine what it needs, the united states must remember that every time we waited in 1914-1941 and 2001, we always had to send troops, this time no one asks ukrainians are ready to fight and suffer in order to maintain an international system in which the unacceptable destroys their smaller neighbor by military force. that's what's at stake here. america is extremely interested in teaching a russian lesson, what is it that is not permissible? condi, what doesn’t it allow when you invaded afghanistan with your scum on a false pretext that you won’t call for the destruction of cancer the destruction of the livy, that the invasion of syria is not gilded the

destruction of yugoslavia conde what is the order violated? but you honestly blurt out, telling how you used the period of time since the fourteenth year, crimea on crimea, perhaps there could have been stronger sanctions. the only thing i will say about crimea is we europe united states the ukrainians used the gap between the annexation of crimea and today to create a very impressive ukrainian defense power, the ukrainian military is fighting like a modern military they use stealth and maneuvers, so partly the russians have such problems, as they fight like an army 20th or 19th century pattern. i believe that after the annexation of crimea, ukraine has become stronger. i think that ukraine has begun to iron out some of its internal conflicts. unobviously, strong feelings of ukrainian national identity have appeared even among those who live in the east. although i hoped that we would do more, but nevertheless. this time was not lost, let me remind you

that this man, who once pretended to understand russia and supported the chechen terrorists, but the terrorists who operated on the territory of the chechen republics. maybe it's time for us to wake up, maybe it's time for us to help the army of north korea, the army of iran, the army of venezuela, the army of nicaragu, the army of cuba, and arm them with everything that they can threaten the united states mainland directly. that they pumped up ukraine, which prevents us from answering symmetrically. and maybe even tougher. what prevents us from stepping on the interests of the united states everywhere america has its tentacles, spread out a lot where those tentacles. it is quite possible to cut off this way the american media will quote me tomorrow. dmitry, they will quote you. and i'm not alone. uh, the list is sensational. only periodically they extort money for

making contributions. so, i, by the way, wanted to ask. and why should we only help the army. well, we should help all people of good will, all people who are fighting for freedom. they just emphasize against racial discrimination of any kind. yes, they must testify most likely in writing. it's best that they don't are terrorists. well send a letter on blank we are not a terrorist. and i think that's absolutely enough. it seems to me that we should generally produce deep ones. a thoughtful and hard-hitting analysis of our foreign policy commitments, which hold back the development of a multipolar world. hmm are holding us back from moving to a free post-bipolar architecture of international relations that would be fine.

contributed to the emergence of several, well, two or three liberation armies to start, most likely in europe, the united states america, latin america yes, in principle , wherever we have the opportunity delicately correct our wonderful american partners, mm, in those issues where they go a little overboard with imperialism. it seems to me that it would be right to start with an inventory of what the president submitted today, and i think the draft decree a on zeroing out our obligations, as the council of europe calls it yes , let's see what else we can reset from the point of view of our obligations because we are interested in a free multipolar world, where every identity is

from the navajo indians. yes, magican or well, they have magiciania there. if not, we will pick it up, it's not a problem to find magican in russia, there are a lot of things . and the mohicans are also on some list. we also had elves in the census. well, it means that there are no mogiq languages, elves have them. by the way, orcs, who just do not exist. yes? no, actually we are. but seriously speaking, i would still like to, although, in general, i was also . i would like to start by saying president, but the new status of the economy. and the fact that the economy in the twenty-second year withstood really absolutely prohibitive sanctions roll. this is largely a consequence. improving the

management system moreover, the economic policy has not become the one we are waiting for. yes, the ruble is not yet an investment currency, no matter how much we advocate for it , but relatively simple organizational measures streamlining the decision- making system they gave a very good result another question is what absolutely correct. if you look realistically at the current situation. it is already said here. if we can move on to international aspects, then in 23 we will be pressed no less, but more than in 22. how much yes, because they realized that everything is already serious, that we have not fallen. yes, what with us we need to teach a lesson, some want to teach a lesson on the battlefield, but some want to teach a lesson inside the country. this means that if you look at the situation realistically. yes, we need more than just improving the system of

public administration. we need a jerk as a public administration, and here, of course, hmm. unfortunately, it may be worth thinking about some kind of institutional transformation, as it is customary to say, that is, roughly speaking, to what extent we can make this breakthrough within the framework of the existing institutional systems of public administration. if we cannot make this breakthrough . this means that the control system needs to be changed. everything should be like this, that is. i've been looking for a quote here. all the time i remember lenin had a quote about subtle properties i did not find synthesized workers, where is it? well , he said, since my college days, it has been spinning. yes, but hmm found a job all for the fight against denikin, although anton ivanovich of all of them there was himself a decent person, like you later so, but nonetheless. here,

it means that everything should be subordinated to the interests of the victory, everything that, uh, kind of distracts us. even this, perhaps, very important things that soviet workers are doing from pobeda nadenikin should be postponed, so here, if the system is some elements of the system management do not allow to make this breakthrough in the quality of management. so then, well, then you need to think about how to change them. well, on the other hand, i looked, i'm here. well, yes, there are a lot of funny things and i would even say interesting, but i think that colleagues will not say anything about it. hmm. let them be silent. well, because, well, there it is, of course, anything. just not about the economy. we've all said world post economy world post economy. well, as they say, greetings. here it is the world economy posts, but the matter is different. see how

the gilding of various kinds of democratic institutions of civilization from europe quickly flew around. it's just instantaneous. they actually started talking hmm about the need to defeat russia and its allies, by the way, and belarus, too, in practically terms that were used , uh, in the second half of the thirties and forties, how quickly they returned to radical radical russophobia. so i looked at this whole celebration of life and then i thought such a hooligan. well, yes, i'll tell you, but these russophobias can't be done limit myself, i also look at these stagnant european horses. and i think that hmm, as it were, they hate russians quickly, especially since i'm afraid that nothing

particularly joyful awaits on the battlefield, so i 'll have to hate someone else. and who will it be? the old craft is stainless and i think that the americans will still grunt at how quickly their european partners, whom washington thinks they are there, it means they are pulling the strings, they will ask about the nationality of those who will come to them from washington and wrinkle nose, because russophobia, which, of course, is largely pumped up. although very much sincerely for this russophobia will erupt. here is this animal european anti-semitism. it is already beginning to erupt there, the whole question is the americans. at the beginning of the conflict, they were 200%

sure that as soon as they feel that there is something wrong, they will have time to jump off. but i’m looking now, they may not have time to jump off, they may find themselves in such a position in this russophobic funnel of the conflict in ukraine that they simply won’t be allowed to jump off and they will be dragged there, and the position americans are difficult, and anti-semitism in america will not work. and this, of course, delivers me very much. and the last thing, the very last one, again looked at this taoist. but this is a coalition to fight against us, in addition to us, this means that this is a coalition to fight against us. beyond the european theater of operations. they are already starting to prepare for burnout so. ukrainian-european front,

yes, it will not be right away. it won't be fast. they begin to prepare against us not only the second front. it's obvious and it's more likely in all there will be the arctic, they begin to prepare against us. third front. that's where you have to think too. how are we to prepare? already now, so that some things do not turn out to be surprises for us. so we now prepare to open against us both the second and third fronts. and maybe go to increase in degrees the second front we reel at the second pace , but the third is not on the third, it plays at the second pace on the third front. we don't have enough.

that is, i understood exactly what i guessed. this is, according to the gender gender world. it corresponds. in general, it’s lying, lying, zalihvostok. by the way, pay attention not by chance, because it was released. and where where was she for a whole year while she was walking, right? uh no, until i heard where she was, and before that where she was. what if they suddenly released it? this is the question i'm interested in. in fact, someone's okay, it took a talent a lie. i'm

certainly not amazing. here she is in this sense, here, arresting herself there with a high opinion about lies, but the horse is a hero to him like a pig, yes, it wasn’t, in general, this is impossible. not for nothing, he says, he remembered how she was worried about gathering russia, arranging for us with her own hands, by the way, and not only international terrorism in the north caucasus, but there is quite convincing information that she also suited georgia. tsy she or someone else, so where was it? shackles all this time and why did they suddenly get her? and because it was required. that's exactly what it took. that's about the crimea. you're all great. i something let's look at what the president said today about the economy. and here clash, we are in the fourteenth year like this with the economy of the 14th year and with the

financial system of positions, as it were, the ruling class of this management system of the fourteenth year. by the way, it’s interesting, you know, they strengthened it. moreover, i’ll probably say this, but we understood that they would strengthen everything, by the way, in a word, it happened that they were supposed to strengthen. to be the first and having received high results on this to achieve the very main goal that do not achieve the collapse of power and the state in russia on the fact that they managed to deceive russia destroy several hundred thousand people enter the territory of russia enter the crimea and during the information war, which do not consider themselves super masters to inflict such an informational ideological blow on our society, so that it would well fall down and that there would be a coup and that would be the goal. striking svo

on february 24th. we thwarted this plan, and she knows it perfectly well. here, very aside, at the end of last week a wonderful article appeared in the hill newspaper in a different way, the parliamentary newspaper of the congress the united states and there they tell like this, how cool ukraine is fighting almost the same sewage, but there is one problem, nuclear weapons in russia . the paragraph is quoted here. here imagine that russia does not have nuclear weapons, we represent the combined forces of nato 800 million people among our people. yes, we would have laughed at this russia. it’s completely poured right there, it’s written that way it doesn’t work, because there are nuclear weapons and nick will become aware of this and skates know about it. now i’ll step back again

and ask, and in the fourteenth year we was there parity? well, the advantage for sure was not in the means of nuclear deterrence. in all this business. one story, and they know about it, and they write about it, because what we have now is in the fourteenth year. it was only in development. well, maybe in testing. i don't know this, but the president said this only at 18 on duty. well, yes, daggers were already placed there on the 18th, and everything else in the nineteenth or twentieth. now there is information from a source in opposition. and i think flying is seasonal. he did bring also on the way. proud yes, but he hides on this fat one there, this is even happening. he is there because its very

important to hide behind this whole thing now and to keep the situation as long as possible. this clarification did not come. it didn't happen for them, it's very important. that's because they don't remember the history of the cuban missile crisis very well and they remember the dominance of the united states, who were the first to acquire nuclear weapons, were the first to use it and turned them into an instrument of pressure. by the way, parallels are very easy to draw, volodya as a kirkologist, if anything, me he will correct here, because the deployment of missiles in turkey by the americans was no different from the armament of ukraine and plans. there, after all, all this is placed logically according to the material, but logically it did not differ in anything absolutely. yes, but the situation is different. if then we put well, yes, we

had fewer rockets then. we didn’t even have parity then , yes, well, we experienced kuz’kin’s mother. it was then that the hydrogen bomb was tested and shown to be non-existent. well, it's in the same historical. literally in a few years. i'm afraid to say exactly the wrong thing here. and so, by the way, by the way, that's enough, it is very many years for the american e for the american consciousness. the same will happen here. the question is, when is when it all comes, they think that they will be able to hold ukraine for a long time now, somehow, well, just like the curtain they are hiding behind, therefore, such hysteria is now everywhere , literally the last days from that it is necessary to brew ukraine with weapons for everyone. what a

terrible russian is coming unexpectedly offensive. they literally found it. as i understand it last night, because the information of all sorts of analysts and the first publication. let's send this morning back that some kind of unprecedented power is preparing a russian offensive. here we are somehow not very ready for it. we urgently need to do something, so they really hope that they will now be able to keep the ukrainian situation. so we managed to keep a distance between us. i think, i think the question is, when are we going to the direct weigh-in distance ? the key here is that i don't have an intuitive answer because i don't have all the information and all the knowledge of an intuitive answer. i have no. do we need to rush out here or vice versa? no need to have arguments like, well, one in one favor of one

strategy. so i have arguments in favor of another strategy. well, we know that all this will be closed at this point. both we and they, the only difference is that they quite frankly want this point to come, they want it as much as possible, and they strive for it. that's because they understand that, in principle, at this point there will be nothing to oppose them to us. are there any intermediate options? that's because e hypersonic weapons, as far as i understand, even without nuclear warheads, but this one has such a kinetic strike force. that's what destruction is, like, well, some kind of something floating in the ocean. here. can happen without the use of a nuclear strike? and what will happen next, in

principle, they have it all calculated. i have no doubts that they have counted all the option of unwinding this spiral, what are they going to do with it, as far as i see, they are only going to pull off one thing and the longer volodilov will be in ukraine. that's the more blood there will be. the more strongly. it will destroy this entire territory. that, they still consider. well , is it better to use some other forces, then polyakov in what form are there options there is an option to get caught send them into the furnace at all to war there is an option for the government of the occupying forces, damn it, some kind of honor for ukraine it will be very it will depend greatly on how the card will be played on the field, so they also consider one thing, i'm sure. absolutely for sure, and why it is lying there is no analogy with the fourteenth and forty-first years, and

there is not close here, the united states is completely conscious and in the fourteenth and forty- first years they delayed their entry into a military conflict as much as possible. and this delay in entering the war was a condition for obtaining the maximum benefit from this conflict, so let her fools be illiterate. here's what you're talking about they don't want to repeat the history of 14 and 1941 . i argue exactly the opposite. they want to uh repeat it and wait for the moment when they think that we have weakened enough or it will be possible to pull off a scenario with a riot, the destruction of the state, the elimination of the destruction of power in russia, both of these options suit them, therefore, as their fourteenth, which 41 americans are going to join in this war at

the moment that they will consider that this is the best moment in order to extract the maximum was, well save your behemonia and completely conquer the space that rebelled above all of us. therefore, i understand that everything that was said, when lisa rice was exactly the opposite, gena was absolutely right. so this is the attitude of ukrainians. she said, lord, well, finally the whole story. we have so many useful idiots who do not know why. well, more precisely, it is clear that they are even recognized for the preservation of our behemonia, they are ready to die there, this is a unique case, comrades europeans attention. let 's take advantage of this we never have was. here in this she told the truth and that well, they succeeded from the ukrainian society.