he has a cannon of 14.000 m 14 km. i said that actually, i wouldn't be surprised if tomorrow the enemy will be used as a defensive even appeared. that new term of which goes for defensive tanks, so here are the effects as it concerns him, that is, it cannot be used offensively. well, he has an old armor. well, in defense it can be used now from the united states of work so actively with african countries and through diplomacy convinces them to deliver. and we supplied our tanks, stood up straight, put them science science, of course they used there, well, as a defensive weapon, yes, and there are a lot of them, and if eastern europe is there, too, and the romanians did it, and the poles and so on. and we had 20,000 pieces of them, 20,000 pieces somewhere in the layouts, somewhere else, do not interrupt. let's not there in your university they don't teach it yes, well, i don't like it, in short, everything is fine. so you need to get it, get it repaired and

run. you don't have to be ashamed of it. this is a wonderful fine weapon. i always remember how in the days of the northern alliance so we violated the alliance anyway with the help of one more side at the request of two other countries. i mean, uh, i'm talking about this issue with the colonel, i won't name those. what should i spoil on my comrades. i say, i was opposed to this case, holding a captive post. i say, but it’s not here that they demand from us that the tank itself served in the turk horse. we have it there, let them not supply it themselves. semyon listen to me was yesterday. we w zakan is a month of defense of one state and so on. that's what you called him. i knew well, he was at the beginning of the kashtab, only he speaks. weapons and with a stock of the russian federation listen, can you do it? let it be on territory of the republic where are you weapons there, but sold? oh well, then we took these from one of the army of the far eastern military district. there we have them, we need to deal with them. we must now gather all our capabilities as much as possible in order to stand up for

saying that they are all defeats. we have now come yet it is impossible to say so. you just need to face a very serious enemy, working, moreover, the complex has not even a single day at all. it can be rescued by military means. she might have looked just including such an important segments, like attracting your side of the population of the enemy to his armed forces and officials, it was ideal to demonstrate the movement, in any way, afghanistan i hope this has been studied pragmatically studied and the afghan region will be studied and the same somewhere and so on, otherwise without involving on their side of the population. we will not be able to solve this problem. vladimir and a lot of very important things were said. probably, we need to start with what is happening, a truly systemic restructuring of the entire system of international relations, we are witnesses of a unique and rather rare process, but natural for history. eh, this has happened many times. it's always

hard. we can say a lot for a long time and rightly that in the west the unexpectedly emotional over the rational now dominates. although the rational used to dominate over the emotional uh, and indeed there are some failures, there is a failure of strategic thinking among our western partners, which is good for us, but do not underestimate what is happening, because unequivocally uh, the americans want repeat the success that they had following the results of the first world war, the success that was following the results of the second world war and enter a new cycle of their development. therefore, uh, the main thing that now they will try to do is to swing this pendulum of conflict, the pendulum of war, because it is vital from the point of view of the interests of the west in terms of regenerating themselves and moving into a certain new stage. uh, the second they will try to slow down the birth of a polycentric world order. uh, what he

said, the head of the european commission is what they want to deprive russia of development opportunities. why is it important? and, because they themselves do not have a model of this very development. from their point of view, it can marad only through conflict through a new rebirth of the dollar system or the system of domination. uh, western world politics. is it possible? well, theoretically, of course, it is possible, but since they have, uh, apparently this plan. no. or he's very successful at hiding, which is why they're pulling everyone out. scandal the israelis of everyone else, because not there are enough people who can say and can clearly say something. she, at least, has some kind of strategic imperial thinking, which the americans used to have, respectively, uh, lack or lacuna in uh, strategic thinking against the background conflict can and should be used. and

how? well, first of all, starting with the fact that we must realize to realize this is very important. this is the first beam, while changing the world and realize the need to change yourself in this world. and we really always occupied a defensive a guardian position is whatever position regarding the system of international relations is the norm of principles that were fixed as far back as the results of e, the second world great patriotic war. this was one of such cornerstone principles of our foreign policy. perhaps the time is right now . the need for this very reboot and the transition from a defensive policy to an offensive one, but for this you need to do your own version of things, first, of course, change e forms. and be that is the institutional form. yes, now we are getting out of, uh, the institutions associated with the west there. yes, but this should not lead to

incoming entries that the east was in our economy. the west is the only thing that we will have in the economy of the east. this, too, cannot be allowed categorically, the second. e, it is necessary, e, to support e to move on to the logic of maintaining e of various social class subjects of various personalities. we u must, roughly speaking, u not maintain relationships with partners, as we have been doing for u for a long time, a talk about vulnerabilities and our rivals and our partners to focus on, but people b on the process and that's it people and processes can lead us. to success a lot has already been agreed here, it was already mentioned today, turkey but this is definitely a good example. e of this complex polycentric world that awaits us, but they can, with their lower capabilities, much more than we do, but we have. yes, they can work with people. they can also form logical groups. they can also engage in soft power, really

engage in such a way that it is soft power, but not at a loss, and then help them develop economically, geopolitical geustoute strategic they can use the process. and whatever they say, the europeans, the americans, turkey continues, well, here's their own line. and this is very important, because this line should not just be declared, you can adopt a lot of beautiful documents, but it is very important, but fill them with real content with a set of actions. yes, because the strategy itself is good. if this strategy no, there is no reinforcement of institutional human capital, there will be nothing corresponding to the economy, which will be brought under this, and the second very important point is connected. uh, also here on the example of turkey, which can be understood on the example of germany, for example. yes, russia has been building good economic

relations with the europeans for many years. we tried, uh, so to speak, to create and, uh, nord stream, yes, to supply gas and have normal relations with the west. we thought that the economy could reverse the ideas of value and geopolitics not it turned out because, at one fine moment, the idea of ​​the national factor in the system of international relations took and broke everything that was built with great difficulty in terms of canada. eh, this experience definitely needs to be taken into account in terms of our relations with the west, because it is not the west. stronger. eh, in this regard. yes? have your ideas on the value matrix. yes , indeed, we have this here, our e, group heroism and our e, what has always been characteristic of our spirit. yes, russian russian, as you wish, but not the west either has its own spirit. this is what is misunderstood, e

in the west, and this same spirit. we need to study very well to study from a point of view. the same vulnerability is studied from the point of view. eh, there are no prospects for stan, when, for example, there are chinese or turkish partners, any others will come here and start doing something here. and here we are, what to do? what institutions do we have, what tools do we have? yes, we talk a lot about the us funds in russia that have entered a large destructive. yes, sometimes we speak and not only american in turkish, and many other issues lies in our activity. about the same post-soviet space, which was discussed today, this very activity of ours is very much awaited. it’s not just about declaring partnerships and so on, and it’s not only and not so much inside the carrot, but what we actually form there, what we want is one of the key issues. i often visit the post-soviet space. i have this question here. but where is the model that you

offer us. here they come and offer a model and money and tools. institutes. everything is being formed. yes, now, probably, the moment has come for this very reassessment of ourselves, what should we start? uh, the turks have pursued and will continue to pursue their logics. it makes perfect sense for them. here is something in the relations between sweden and finland, and the fact that the turkish side has now announced one more time that sweden will not be able to expect support and turkey until turkish requirements are met. so it is not necessary to write here. this will continue until the tour. receive the maximum amount of dividends, this is art diplomacy, when it turns out, may not be everything you want, but turkey essentially forces not only sweden, finland to change, turkey in fact. he is trying to influence the entire north atlantic alliance, is to follow his own logics. these logics are important, but to formulate and bring up

the institutional base, you define people and for it to start working as such a well-coordinated mechanism, then everything will be fine on all fronts, of course. as for vulnerability. eh, it's necessary. in my opinion. not only to know the enemy's vulnerability points, well, skillful to use and corny to expose them to demonstrate enemies. well, for example, uh, women's no one wants to be mentioned, wrote a lot of green underbelly and the soviet union , these our enemies have under the belly of mexico, when, for example, uh, the years of trump's presidency, huh? it was the mexican drug cartels who got the american president, he turned to the mystic president and said, well, let's take care of the american special forces of his properties, otherwise you have a low thousand for each individual drug cartel there units of these equipment, which they calmly, so to speak, transport. why didn't mexico say? yes, i have a post, the next day my fellow citizens will be killed. if at least one american soldier enters on his feet

, there is mexican land. this is such a degree of anti-americanism. why don't we simply use this to increase the degree? uh, well, let's not say hate, well, just a reflection of this policy of a crazy cowboy, literally in advance under the belly of the united states, this is not a cube for you. is not vislouelas. this is a huge suffering so far not clamped by historical wounds. here is the relationship with our adversary. as for europe, i don't think that the flame of anti-semitism will ignite too strongly there. that's why the situation is bad on the highway to france. let's say this. so you need the transfer of the arabs of the israeli conflict, because most of the migrants from the countries of the middle east they are precisely the carriers of this anti-semitism, and for example, the terrorist from 2015 in the botan e concert hall he had just these are the roots of the arab israeli

conflict. it's just that the previous owners of the concert hall spent several evenings raising funds for the israeli army, and, accordingly, for the e-terrorists. it was such a landmark goal, like, in its time and in argentina, for example, a terrorist attack, against a jewish cultural center, respectively, here, uh, europe is faced with the export of kurt turkish arabs israeli shiite court there, uh, huge mishanina. and this, by the way, is also a factor that greatly interferes with ours. by opponents to consolidate uh, including uh . as one man under the banner of uncle on his own. no, it won't. for example, uh, literally a couple of days before the catholic christmas in france, a grandson. uh, general degulya uh, made uh, a very important statement, big interviews, uh, or not . e, in. uh, respectively, where he

said that in fact there is an destruction europe of the fatherlands of the establishment of a global dictatorship of transnational corporations will destroy, and he literally said the following: you want to abolish russian culture. forgive more than half of all the inventions of physics. chemistry, mathematics at other points were made in russia, you want to note this, you want to cross out, uh, all the nobel prize winners of russian origin, respectively, this is european. i'm just saying, i'm tired of everything, this time. listen, this paphos how is it that someone asks sanitary questions somewhere to the almighty you want who they are. understand that they are collective - it's like a collective unconsciousness is very specific. you said corporations are collective operations, understood in no way as firms and companies. and as a corporation of people who, respectively, are those who believe that they are the masters of the world, there is still a moment. they

want to cancel everything, this is the tchaikovsky man, as they say, well, not all people want to be canceled. eh, again returned to the topic of russian literature. here, remember, hyperbole did not help them in germany yes, uh, hyperbole gagarin's engineers and shulgi's dialogue. and hmm gagarina just says everything that is good for the soviet government. eh, it's good for her. it 's good. here respectively. probably, maybe even a little cynical to act. if we see that there is, uh, a fault line there in european american society. well, probably need to drive a few clinics. yes, dmitry says in this line that every time we try to interview some person with a significant surname. that is, such as film. yes ghosts of faults citizens of my left calf there is a great sign. no, yes, that is, all these tremors remain exclusively in the left calf. that is, unfortunately, the level of

western consolidation or such that they are more likely to be severely subjected to any person who tries to go what we believed you know people are just an iron and the elite yes of the media community. yes, but in the end there are alternative ones, the dissenters who are very hard pressed in the same europe and, accordingly, er, in the same other countries, therefore. possibility e for just make trouble complicate starting conditions our opponent is great, how will we complicate it? well, not exactly, we know how, but for this purpose it is necessary that they work, again guys, platov's types of tingon here people who knew well understood and were able, that is, experienced, we have, but now this is not our method. unfortunately, as we stated. well, this is a rhetorical question, and i urge

that there are methods. this means that we need to put the right people in the right positions and boldly, without hesitation, discarding all inferiority, do our job. only three days. somebody blew up our dams and killed dugin and a strike on the crimean bridge of a nuclear power plant on our territories and behind these very specific people stood behind everything, who instructed the people of the state in the special services and someone answered, someone answered. this is again a rhetorical time when no one answers arises. very impunity. so, of course, what do you think that now the tanks are coming there will be delivered long-range ones. it 's this, because we don't answer. we didn't

tell you they're talking, but we're not participants. conflict, because they said, since when are they in this case, if we are in conflict and what will it lead to? therefore , it is easy for us, we do not have state powers, therefore we can offer to express our position many times, try this and there are our positions. i'm not specifically fighting you. sasha, i hear these questions. i say, i will hear these questions for a long time. but there is a question, how to implement all this? there is a question, but to have no illusions. here's a link to us climate representative john kerry, that's what he stated simply. listen so that there is no doubt about it. it is rather unusual that we are a select group of human beings due to the fact that it has touched for some time in our lives

the ability to come together and talk about saving the planet. extraterrestrial occupation here is a group of beings of human people, you want in all seriousness that they are reptilians, this is a person. this is what he has developed so far. here it is. well, it's avatar superman. it's the same besides. why is the phrase sub-humans people to selected human beings. here we are dealing we are dealing with a racist, of course when we try with them. our countries

we will, if we finished with the last phrase, indeed, there is a holy war, and if you follow the logic of scripture, then it will indeed be the last war in the history of mankind before the second coming and , accordingly, the task of russia, if you believe her prophecies of russian saints, is just the same, to collect all the healthy forces that are ready, more precisely, not ready to go. here, according to the pre- domain of these satanists, who proclaimed themselves superhumans, where is this

land of gogi and mogogy? yes, please. well i guess that a lot of what the americans say is taken from here from russia from what happened. they think now of a superhuman, but superhuman i dare say. these were the first generation after the second world war of soviet people who, 15 years later, flew into space for science, uh, industry, everything that was, then they realized that they could not achieve this, therefore they could be given. as you said avatar yes, well, that is, this is a reality that does not exist, which, after all, after a year, they raise. i am not talking about that. now i wanted to remembered the president. putin is talking about unemployment here, what is three seven? in my opinion, three and five are something in russia with more. yes,

that is, large. i remember, i remind everyone this year 15 in greece was 29 to 29% unemployment is not officially about 40-45. such a simple question, if as a result of these energy battles that have been going on in europe lately, we will see several european countries with twenty percent, we will not say thirty there are all unemployment, what will it be, but we need to think about this and maybe when, uh, stop saying that we don't give energy there, because we blew everything up and so on. and it is necessary to support precisely these threads. and why is that what her name is? when russia and we have

to defeat russia because that's how it was created to work in the energy sector? in total, i, unfortunately, agree this is not the case, not in agreement. the fact is that objectively russia has been isolated in the information space. so if you want to watch solovyov now, somewhere in greece there is do you have bad internet? and he says, then you won’t see everything very bad internet. if you want something yourself look from russia the only thing, and salos, as in greece, was during the time of the turkocrats. only these are secret schools where one could have a small one like this. uh, a small cat to somehow look to study buckwheat. i have them there orthodoxy or whatever is happening like this now, and nevertheless, nevertheless. i will agree with you that there are a huge

number of people. there is a society and this society. i can see, i'm working from here to heat up everything, but he really cherishes the fact that something was from russia, so that something here. at least there are some informational breakthroughs that should be there, and we should try to work on this. and one more thing you said, here is the protalism of the year. i remember now perfectly after what she did there in august of the eighth year. i remember that she was in greece exactly in the eighth year. i just don’t remember until august or after it doesn’t matter and of course, then she couldn’t think if sweden wanted to or somehow didn’t think would, then of course, because she was thinking a little about something else. she said there in athens

the future in athens she said we were worried about one thing. the influence of one single country in the energy sector of greece in russia is not allowed by gazprom to work and somehow monopolize the energy sector of greece, they have produced since 15 years have passed there. they got it from the fact that, despite the fact that greece is one of the countries that russia then had about 75%, now they have dropped to the level forty percent. and the sleep that greece now receives and is brought there by american tankers, at least 90% of all this is

russian gelendzhi, which greece allows itself to be believed, this one, which is in such an economic situation, pays 4-5 times more than pipeline gas. and yet all this is happening, so i, of course, am not sergei viktorovich lavrov, but i could repeat his phrase morons, but there are none in europe. there are no leaders. you say, this is what we say this is the president of france prime minister of greece germany and so on, these people do not have a name, that is, a table, and they do not exist. they are the governors general there of their american there, and the representative and that's all . none of them is any french. they don't have any macrons there, not the slightest possibility of this, so i'm afraid. what

even? greece will be convinced in quotation marks that there are 300 that are. the only country on the one that had the s-300, the previous 20 years. i 'm afraid that soon we will see them somewhere on the battlefields . now advertising after will not continue in new composition. you will bring us to introduce you to the rank of frontation.

we have grenades, he wants to throw for his dad for his older brother from all coffee shops. and the task is to survive and reach and there is no choice, there is a righteous person according to chance.

we usually talk about how the kiev

regime is preparing for the next meeting of ramstein luka, another logic is not to knock more weapons out of western sponsors. ukraine does not understand that western sponsors will give weapons anyway. it's a completely different game. ukrainians think they are begging for weapons, in fact, the west is watching, when ukraine is ready to take the next stage at a different degree, it will not come out alive, except for those who, for various reasons, but were able to leave ukraine. therefore, ukrainians are drawn there and when ukrainian politicians make written speeches, moreover, they are written by western speechwriters, then they think how cool we persuaded to give us.