i must ask you today, a lot has been said about ukrainian society. i stood listening, listening and caught myself thinking. for example, i have lost some kind of global sympathy for the ukrainians. rather, it didn’t even lose it, it burned me out burnt out tatally when i saw the flywheel of joy among users of the ukrainian segment of the internet in a video with torture of russian soldiers who are absolutely inhuman and

absolutely unnecessary in any sense, this is what animal joy i lost, when you correctly remembered when curse the russians children of parents, when they call, they promise to cut off the head of relatives and friends, and at some point this burnout snap actually occurs. and even you start thinking about eating well. this is what you called ukrainian society. although i would n't call it that. in my opinion. this is already such a metastasis that is just rushing somewhere, someone will be released to europe to wave a flag to fill someone. face to declare that they are the first aryans in the village. and you are the second, someone begging davos such a front of escorts to see someone in russia and here is the last caste that worries me especially . we even had a discussion at one time by sergey karnaukhov, who was one of the first to raise the topic that friends russia, of course, a generous soul , we are open to us, a huge number of people came from mariupol, so once you squealed on italian television fascists of mariupol hate you such friends. i

stood in line with them at the border in russia for 4 hours, this is not the limit. if they hate us, that they are already standing, but in this queue , it was quite obvious that there were agents waiting they were quiet, hating, and so on and so forth, and now this is a charming bastard. now they are spread across the expanses of russia's large cities. they are unlikely to train to some outback. she is not interested in them. moscow, peter tver, and so on, and these wonderful charming bastards are sitting and at that moment x i already spoke in your program and i do not renounce. ukraine is over. forget this term. this is a wonderful rock painting. all remained. these same ukrainians. political ethnic very different, some of them are certainly adequate normal people who want to live their lives, have children, love to do. i don’t know, it ’s easy to live there with repairs, but someone will commit a terrorist attack, kill people like dugin is given to kill any other russians, and not

only russians, they will work from melitopol and they work on the fly. poplar we see the number of terrorist attacks. this is not all done and the right thing is being done. well, what are you saying , and even according to the statistics that we have, we understand that the ukrainian side is not going on the offensive there about rybolov , they are using telephones, contacts, threats, corny money, incite the waiters for miles to put green devices. e in the trash can. and the fact that a woman with a pregnant stroller is walking by. who cares if she died? creature, okay? as they think no, and exactly this they plan to do in the vastness of russia in the vastness of our cities and here. it seems to me that it is time for us russians to end with this lovely tolerance, tolerance to whom the russians are all in power, they teach us. for journalists, you know, on this one, maybe then we’ll just be ukrainian triangles, yellow chest stepson, for example, let's take our volodya medina valentin ivanovna

matvienko, i just understand what you are talking about, but when i hear the term that ukrainians are ethnic yes, they ran into me, somehow everything, like the jews, boils. i didn't say go. well, that is, that's what among them is very good, but among ours there is none. for example, deputies. i wanted to say, a member of the state duma. what is my attitude towards ukraine, no enemy, of course, the enemy, and when we look, for example, who was the russian minister of foreign affairs and was born in kursk and one of the main generals, ukrainian commanders da syrsky sun. in general, he is purely russian. ours is finished. just as soon as we start to reduce it to the ethnic component. we not only lose them we cigar and no meant. i don’t propose to hang yellow ones on them yet, so that we pronounce it very clearly, because at these moments i feel like

ukrainians more than rodion, i told them directly that they don’t speak ukrainian. this is where everything boils in me. he has a genetic memory, probably throw ukrainian language, no one is underage. you invite them to hang something on their foreheads or on their chests. no, that's not the point. the point is when i said that we need to be less tolerant. in my opinion. it's time for us to stop playing with political ukrainians, we are still broadcasting the idea at different levels that some part of ukraine is in some form in the genus. how should be preserved and we really hope that there will be adequate. yes, there will not be an adequate policy. all this is impossible, because, as was rightly said, boiling. that's it what we now call ukrainian society, in principle, is no longer capable of being led by someone adequate, this a priori will be an enemy who will wait for money and the opportunity to deliver blows or not, saldoras. no already, but until recently he was a ukrainian politician no, the head of the

russian federation but until recently he was a ukrainian political and most of the political. well now he has become a russian. once again, i don’t say, it’s necessary to multiply by zero , spiridon palych was the sitters, he sat correctly in one committee, and balitsky, brother, once again, i'm not looking for enemies of the people, and generally a little bit not about me. well, i'm not talking about this, i just don't know kolinkar's marriage, what i was talking about. well, i don’t know at all what will happen on the territory that is now ukraine, i don’t know what will happen on the territory that is now france italy germany i just don’t know, i think it’s impossible to make any plans now. i don't know what policies will appear. i just really can't say what's going on in the fourth year. we might suppose that a german practical republic would emerge forty-fourth i don't think, of course not. i

mean, her life is much richer. i would not now limit myself to these limits, and this is not a frame, if suddenly a rusyn prince appears, who suddenly takes and raises the rusyns to a sacred struggle, but don't we give the rusyns the opportunity for autonomy. in my opinion, whiskey and civil. no, there is a part of russia, there are future parts of russia, after our day is over, we will liberate russia, maybe carousel, russia again, of course, but i am not ukraine well, look, here this part will definitely take away the fields already successful doing it. that's what it means to be surrounded more on all sides no but, you know. here we may be. to begin with, we will win in the process of this movement. i will say.

so maybe we are in the process of this movement. but, for example, was kovpad ukrainian and what else? i'm just getting there, but one of the clients wasn't an idiot at all. and when we say that he took the minus of historical reality, which was after all. we always proceed not from our wishes, but from specific historical reality, maybe absolutely a mistake. really a mistake, maybe it was not necessary to take lev but it was necessary to leave warsaw because, as it was said, yes, comrades churchill, that lviv was never russian, warsaw was said, maybe just this one would have been the right size. again, a great view at a distance, and no matter how it turned out later that a pill. i'm talking about something else right now. i don’t even look that far yet, although i still insist that ukraine has finished all this is a matter of delayed time. like

someone does not like the poles, they will attack. they are already doing it. they will feel for themselves. here is more tin. it 's not a matter of delayed time, and not the next one, of course, started at all. this is the global machine. it is possible in the question, and who will remain? the strongest no, we are not belarusians, this is china, this is russia says, there will be no way to say why we are the strongest , based on what, based on the reality that is taking shape. well, the reality that is shaping up on us is required to prove that we are the strongest, we are trying it again to prove in the process, but politely speaking, well, participation in the west is still highly doubtful, i doubt it, but i am more than sure that a solidarity breakthrough. i think this is how, as a result, the plant made them at least scratch their noses and generally think again about what was happening, whether we had problems in our zone

in the twenty-second year, of course, and thousands of people were certainly not easy. to put it mildly, it really was not easy, and those who took him to tell about tactics, that is, not just pincers, but also third direction, but then again it was. for yes, strategic or there, i don’t know how important the settlement is tactically. but this is not kharkov again. i'm not saying that we wave the flag of victory, we took everything, dnepropetrovsk is not poltava, but this is important. it's still important and at the moment when there are people who are not widowed at the forefront, and that's it, there it is wagner - these are the regular forces of the russian federation of the dpr lpr, mobilized by him. although nothing is at the forefront, but we'll see how it goes and when they have behind their backs they hear endless discussions about some kind of political renaissance in ukraine, i don’t know, maybe you didn’t talk to him about this topic. it raises questions in them, i

saw the discussion. well, let's take the article. he wrote to medvedchuk and wrote. he wrote this to whom, but this is a good person writing for an audience there, and do we really have no attempts. this eternal government was called by its people, if ukraine no longer exists, well, ukraine still exists and several million live there. prepare candidates for a minute we either win or we are preparing some candidates for ukraine but not such a stupid person used all the possibilities. i also worked for a german bureau and worked carefully to disrupt german society. ukraine was the ussr there were a lot of things, so there were some mistakes that were also made by mistake. in the end, we see that it was the national actions that began to take place , including yes or else they went around everything due to this, pursued a policy and sorted out

gigantic european territories happened when stalin died, when stalin number came to power. the stupidest person, khrushchev, who quarreled with china, seems to play a role too, well, in the history of a human role, but comrade stalin ended his life at the top of a great empire, about which he built from countries that obeyed him, but not his fault, that idiot, in general already with dead demand especially. no. i'm talking about the fact that the country is more than the personality of one person. he also works for him, he is also a competent politician, because how could he go on the internet? now we will take we will refuse. well, something good on medvedchuk wrote, well, wrote, who do we have in russia , by the way, there is still the same yanukovych, yes, who will lose their pens and may be waiting. revenge. from what mode? well, it worries someone at the front, what yanukovych wants, in fact, it irritates people. the guys at the forefront don't read at all. for them, these people,

in general. no, they don't read very well, they read very well. i am nobody where does this come from? and they ask questions they just asked people in which unit you were told that yanukovych worries me so much we are trying to understand, we have victory to the end and we are flirting with ukraine to the end. negotiations participants came a man wrote an article on freedom of speech. let him write who said that this is the policy of our state. this is a claim that he sees you as a certain political figure, and someone sees himself as napoleons in ukraine. what difference does it make to us? well, that's how he believes. he is my rusyn prince. i'm here in our public political this is our bipolar is connected with what we see in everyone and believe that this is evil. what is victory here we are person. well, you know, a man from ukraine took

something written. well, i wrote. one more time, come on, come on, okay. let's make it easier. let's marvel at the right, so that they do not have the right to write again, i do not suggest that i show nothing to anyone and hang some serious ones, but the person takes part in some exchanges, the person was involved in the police, we say that everything is sitting, not a word, you have no right speak. so he practically should not have. as what does it mean should, so we are on the sidelines with us. now we define someone to be political vice- who does not, in fact , any country regulates, who can have political ambitions. and who, as it were, can still have a list of those who are, because , for example, i’m generally divided in half, what do many ukrainian politicians say yesterday today? you are the power, if suddenly our power says something that causes me a deep feeling there, then i ask this question. and if some private person, do it in relations with our country, so we exchanged him specifically, really. he who, now he is russian. he is generally a visa to spain

. i don’t know who doesn’t play any role, he is a man who was in captivity, he is a man who was tortured, he is a man who previously took part in the exchange, but a man whom someone has claims there is no one, but that's not the point. what does it mean, first he was struck in all rights in ukraine and now in russia what are you talking about? be quiet. and why are we different from the ukraine of the nazis? hmm actually colossal, we don't try it. we don't close it anywhere. well why let's be tortured, but if you are now we say we will limit your political freedoms, if it doesn’t mean that we like him, how we twist the story about the fact that in this situation you definitely don’t have to finish with political ukrainians for games, that we will try someone. and here is this summer transition. political ukrainians political ukrainians - this is when we talk about admitting that ukraine in some form, they surrender to the level of the state. they said that we do not allow this, our president. at least once he said this, we allow the negotiation process, with whom? well

she is not. as you say, then it turns out that everyone who says that they are traitors should be shot. i said somewhere that it is necessary to tell, because if we allow the idea of ​​a political ukrainian. so, he will say the existence of ukraine is there is no ukraine then with whom are you talking? so. here is my thought, just that it is time for us to finish in general for games not negotiations. we have everything, either our own and before victory, or let's then pause it and accept it. being a dumb president right, we will just make ourselves hating everyone and everyone we will do with russian haters, too, from a big problem they become infected. speaking of which, here's your income. for example, i think that we should go to the victory. but i think that if we allow ourselves to arrange in this way, stuffing, what kind of stuffing? well, as people, when we say,

so you were tortured in ukraine, you came here. here you are nobody to sit and be silent. yes, he has the right to his point of view , we don’t say that for a second. and as we say, well, you you offer him to shut up, decided. you are now a citizen. what do you want? i want to become a citizen of russia, all the tiger you are a citizen of russia, please, that they cannot say their point of view, that i'm talking about ambition. well, honestly, you have ambition in life. i don't want to say ukraine well, well, other killers. do you have it written somewhere for us, what is it at the moment? has the right to beat limited contours. my country is limited by your ambitions. no, we live, either according to the law, or according to the concepts about completely different things. for example, i do not like all these people, but i believe that if we go this way, we will slide into such a bloody rut in 3 seconds. i'm not suggesting they

be planted behind a thorn, offering to shut up the next you say you can't shut up on you, we'll try to shut up. well, listen, well, they offered us to decide kostev, stop dealing with bipolar disorder. we do n't have that kind of bipolar disorder, men fight, they don't read at all. they do n't have it all, they fight them. they don't read it at all. and it doesn't matter at all. who wrote what here. here we have strengthened, who are strong. listen , guys, there are musicians, they don't actually read. they have a specific task to solve. they understand everything about ukraine. their task is quite specific; they are doing their job when all this discussion about politicians begins. it’s our military officer who loves the blogger very much, moreover, not the real encore a type of military officer, we love all this, but we don’t need it. all you need to do is calm down a bit and do your own thing. and with this i agree with this something. i do not at all when we begin to talk about the political ukraine yes, first let's

define what it is. well, yes. or just decide it's worth it. this is when ukraine remains as a subject on the map and continues to have its own political elite. we have a legal day. it is forbidden to act. outside of the law, not only do you propose to impose your supreme commander-in-chief. i don't know, but just what they said sounds more than strange. no, logically. no, normal does not sound normal at all, but political german filson, perhaps we should once again which side should remain in existence? just tell me so i can understand. this is what the front line of history will determine. and time, what's left? something will be left for me. this is how it should be at any moment. ok then. let's destroy all of ukraine let's destroy all ukrainians, because they have no right to decide their fate. as suggested from here. i

propose to accept the fact that they will no longer have a country. you are proposing to somehow change everything, to whom ukrainians should all of us. here they are not want him to accept this war. no. although she hasn't had a side for many years now, who didn't have a side, they no longer had a side. they were born, the conditions of generations, there was no connection. now someone will be kurdish in europe , someone will be someone, there will be even more fierce resistance, of course. well, it will. of course not. that ukrainians will come out of us at some point, fall in love or what? well, i look, for example, at the history of the chechen people 20 years ago. he told me that the chechens would love us better, and they would fight shoulder to shoulder shoulder. and now i'm some kind of bastard allows myself to make completely vulgar statements about the appointment. e brother from the body of ludinov to a high position. i think that this bastard, who needs to be found and put in jail, who jokes about the hero and his brother

well done, right, and 20 years ago. if anyone does this, who are they at all, why are you talking, in general, the history of the whole complex examples. well, let's really all special examples and only the unfortunate ukrainians of russia of the soviet union yes, we are becoming, why are we in this this topic periodically comes to the studio, yes, that is, now it’s so radical. here is a very fertile ground, on which you need to throw it in, yes, that is, there are so many who want to say here. and that one over there will not be a nationality. we will decide for her, we generally need to delete them altogether and shoot them at the entrance. but these, too, will not listen, and you are in the trenches, which you were there, you saw. there is someone there, but the people's militia of the dpr of the lpr. and there, how, too, expand-expand- sort ukrainians here, russians here, or how? when, wait, why did we start dividing, when i said that it is necessary to separate ukrainians from ethnic ukrainians, that she was

100, she was said in the sentence there are ukrainians and ethnic ones are political. i want to talk about political ukrainians, how to segregate them will be the second i speak. i just list what they have their technical obviously medical 30 years. everything else i was talking about is political ukrainianism, which is good for russians? but you are a political ukrainian, who are political ukrainians, who you, all your life fought with the nazis with them, what are we going to do, they have the freedom to choose part of russia what kind of freedom of choice? you tell him you don't have a motherland goodbye. listen, the medical factor is also not there yet, the medical park, that while the war is going on, and it is not enough of this, the medical fact is that they are not going to give up easily. here is a medical fact. listen to this too. we are so so so so there is an expectation that

let's share. and let's these people that russia is actually strong for its unity and multinationality. yes, that is, and why are you decided from the general spectrum of people living on this in russia and fighting for russia, yes, the ukrainians decided to go here and the rest there. yes, it sounded from yours because of what you said here, that's exactly what it is. yes, yes, therefore, in general, in principle, not here, that means, raising that topic in general, in principle. and let's, and ukrainians from not ukrainians. let's ban them. let's not give at all. what will happen on the territory? what will happen on the territory? well, just in case, we banned everything with this. listen to the ukrainian ssr, will it interfere with you or not ukrainian ussr i remember it didn’t interfere with me, and i remember the beautiful one was decided that something was needed there , something would definitely be something. yes, that is, now they are going there, but there is a hostile project that is actually controlled from the outside. and most importantly, its problem is that it is controlled from the outside, it does not correspond, in

fact, to the national interests of ukrainians. here, wait listen, wait who would say. he said just in case. that's how i have four more people retold what the division said here down to the separation. we now deny it too. okay, listen, that is, this is it, it seems to me that the topic itself is very dangerous, really very dangerous, and now after this program we will have a lot of haters and a lot of support, that is, we will start to prick for real. yes, society, that is , everything is clear on the front line, there are enemies, and here are friends, and in these trenches today we are fighting, ukrainians, belarusians and russian tatars, and everyone else, and there a week by nationality, though they don’t share. we come to the studio, we start to share, we say, this is the nationality. we won't let you do anything. and here it is, let it stand here. but we will call these, let them build something on this territory. wait. we do not even understand that in this territory

you will not understand. how the operation will end, what will happen in the end, there will be negotiations, of course. will there be any education there? what kind of education is this? of course, it will definitely be necessary, listen, the ussr had an education. was it or not? it was russia that was education. that is, it was all, you know, that is, therefore, now he says, we are going there, nothing of this will happen there. you know, it's too much. zaya now choose some nationality, on which to start hanging all the dogs, therefore, if you now put belarusians, russians and ukrainians. you can hardly guess which of them understand who, but start throwing these things into society. that is, understand, they are explosive light. they are explosive they start to rock this situation. that's really to swing, as well as ambitions, to lead education. wait ambition. what do you know that something is more terrible than those ambitions, yes, ambition is more terrible. it is more terrible to determine who will lead these ambitions, that i

will determine who will be there, that i cannot exactly determine this right now. that's exactly what you said you allowed it, so we won't allow it. listen. let's clear this area. let's understand. who is there who lives in this territory and let's give people who organize the possibility of self-government. listen, in the fourteenth year. we didn't have anything. somehow self-government was organized and mayors appeared, and other leaders, deputies and everything else, well, somehow it was formed, yes, and they didn’t ask anyone for this territory, it has been on it for 8 years. we are in order, firstly, listen, you understand, that is, firstly, during this time we will hear a lot of everything, but very many did not perceive at all. yes, that is, they didn’t say which territory of russia you listen to, we are scared how you approach it, because there will be sanctions, yes it was, then we ourselves voted now. we fought eight years and now we have been part of russia yes, that is, now you come, speak and let's filter here once, who will be, who is right, who is wrong, but we heard that way, yes, that's why i say that this

topic she is very dangerous, very dangerous. before you say anything, pick it up. yes, that is, you need a clear, intelligible understanding of how it will all end and how your word spoken on this topic will respond. you know, that is, uh, there is no way to interpret ms. rice's statement? yes, that is, he is very simple and clear who our ukrainians are in tyre, this time no one is asking us for troops, the ukrainians are ready to fight and suffer, and so on. here their role is defined, it is clear that they are ready to die for the interests of ukraine, so the americans have defined them. enough, why do we have to do this? listen to us, well, ukrainians have always been part of a big, big family, but this is the russian empire of the soviet union. why are you starting to single them out from there? why? why is this happening? yes it happened. that's it. i bet from what and not the first time, by the way, in this studio it happens. what happened in this studio? listen, i said, i'm different. i'm here, let's then we will weigh each word. when we talk about it, because when we remember, when we remember ukrainians

, start remembering korolev, start vernadsky, start remembering gogol, yes, that is, these are the great people who made up the population that made up. i don't know the rod there. so we need a big russian state and we don’t need it, well try to innovate, that this nation is good, but this is not. and i didn't say that. yes, can you help? give, well, well, but tatarstan may not be like that, bashkiria may be the territory of the russian federation, this is their choice. this is the territory of the russian federation, this is not enough in fact, tatarstan signed the union treaty, let me remind you in the nineties, later than the rest now. it is an integral part of the territory of the russian federation. well, we have come this way, yes, that is, we have held a referendum. we reclaimed this right and we came of our own accord became part of russia now, i’ll say this, of course, well, no one filtered nationalities there, if a slow-moving guy with his letter, by the way, he can take 300,000 pieces from the

front for me. let another 10,000 write, if it were so there, do you know that it is so no , most likely not, and you took it from something? what did you decide? what do you know, that you understand his audience the second game in ukraine is the second? in ukraine, was anyone in what year? what's the difference two years ago 2 years ago do you think we'll make connections? yes of course, why do you decide that, because we live in the reality of war, in general, other rules, other conditions, you think that you understand them more than he thinks, yes. well, then it's different. just then i'm not laughing here. no no. i don't use the other inhabitants here anymore. donetsk wrote treatises. they then he said, he was answered, and everyone, in my opinion, has already dotted it. and now we say, let's not let him

speak at all on every question. we would give him a letter no to our military correspondent, if cells in ukraine voted for medvechak 's party remained, of course people. there are people left. you know deeply about these 19, here is medvedchuk's base. and it didn’t sound deep, therefore, on this one, but why, for example, not take over, but leave the opportunity, at least doubt, that he has a political chance, that he can pull people out of the front? he doesn’t write to you, he writes to his audience in ukraine. if he sows doubts about zelensky’s correctness to his audience in ukraine and will be able to turn away at least a few tens of hundreds of thousands of people for me, let him write. this is no longer possible. well, now you will have to decide for him. well, i'm fine now. i will now finish part of what