the formation of a multipolar world, which is not taking place by the decision of some cabinets for descendants or in some other capital, but simply occurs naturally, because countries develop economically. take china take india as our strategic partners. look at turkey, brazil , argentina, egypt, and many countries of the african continent, where the potential for development, taking into account the colossal reserves of the sold resources, is urgently informed by new centers of economic growth. the west is trying to prevent this, including i speculate on, uh, the mechanisms that were created to serve his interests within the framework he created of globalization. and, of course, here the role of the dollar as a reserve currency is one of the main ones. that

is why we are now in the framework of our contacts, uh, uh, with the shanghai cooperation organization in brix in other structures, of course, the cis eurasian economic union yes, and cooperation with associations. asia, africa, latin america, we are doing our best to build new forms of interaction so as not to depend on the west from his now it is clear not about non-intelligent methods about this president. putin frankly clearly said the methods of these inventions only in order to rob the rest of the world already in the new conditions. and we will be with our reliable partners with friendly countries, and we will build such forms of interaction that will benefit us and that those who want to fix the whole world for themselves will not be able to influence. these are the ones i have. in the assessment of the past

year, but the main thing is that the processes that this year saw, they were born, they were born not yesterday. they originated many years ago, and they will continue, because the formation of a multipolar world is the final formalization of those relations that are required for democracy to reign in the world, justice, and the principle of the charter on respect for the sovereign equality of all states is respected. this will take, of course, time, and charter it is a very good base. when it was adopted, it really was a revolutionary document. unfortunately. all these correct principles were perverted. uh, there was no west no respect from the west for the sovereign principle. with you, the state had

no respect for the principle of non-intervention in internal affairs and the peaceful settlement of disputes hundreds of times many hundreds of times after the creation of the un, the united states used its military forces abroad. in most cases, in gross violations, and therefore the charter is therefore the process of forming a multipolar world order will be long. it will take a certain historical era, and we are in full swing. e of this process. uh, sometimes directly involved of such a scale of events, not everything is immediately visible, therefore, uh, constant contacts with each other , exchange of assessments, exchange of impressions. e is very, very valuable for us, and this applies not only to our partners in foreign countries, but also to our colleagues and the media . your observation, right? even those

questions that you want to ask us are very, very helpful, please. let's move on to this, please, ria novosti thank you very much. ah christina he rodriguezria news e sergey viktorovich how do you rate the chances that this year it will be possible to organize talks between russia and the leading western countries led by the united states on ukraine what security issues in the framework of the ukrainian settlement moscow would like to put on the table of these negotiations the active phase will be stopped. thank you, do you admit that the probability that this year the power active phase will be stopped by the military thank you about the power active phase. it's already been commented many times these questions. our military president, in person.

eh, he confirmed once again that the special military operation has targets that are not fictitious, that are not easy to take from the ceiling from the target. uh, are determined by the fundamental legitimate security interests of the russian federation and, uh, the interests of its position, and in the world, first of all, in our immediate environment. in ukraine, as in any other territory, there should not be a border with the russian federation. military infrastructure infrastructures that pose a direct threat to our country in ukraine there should be no discrimination of persecution against our compatriots, who, uh, more judges seemed to be citizens of the ukrainian

state, but want to preserve their language, their culture, their traditions to bring up their children in these traditions, emphasizing in full compliance with the constitution and ukraine in which, in which it is written that ukraine guarantees the free development and use and protection of russian and other languages ​​of the national minorities of ukraine and this constitution remains in force. we will distribute as i understand it, we have materials that simply sent out materials that simply list such constitutions, uh, and uh, then specific obligations of ukraine under international conventions, and then a voluminous list of those laws that were adopted in

violation of both the constitution and international obligations this same ukrainian state. and you know, i was like that some time ago, i was surprised a couple of months ago, and zelensky’s interview, uh, he, uh, means that if you let russia win, then other big countries will decide, that they too can about such countries on different continents. uh, it's enough, so they'll choke the little countries and divide the rest among themselves. and i told zelensky i am for a different scenario, when everyone on the planet will know that no matter where he lives, he has the same rights and is also protected, like any person in the world. this is what the man said. which was in october, and

in september 2021 the year before zelensky how do you know he said that uh? individuals live in the east, not people, and if someone of the citizens of ukraine feels russian and thinks in russian and wants to remain, but russian, then for the good of his children, for the good of his grandchildren, he needs to get out to russia and this was said by the same person who now considers declared that that dreams of everyone being equal and everyone could live in everyone as he wishes. it ’s clear that these beautiful words are issued for the needs of the west, but that’s all. this very strongly characterizes the current regime and is understandable. why can't we give up

the goals of the basic goals of a special military operation, with regard to the prospects for negotiations, but this has already been done dozens of times. discussed considered. i do not want to repeat the obvious facts, since march, when we supported ukraine's request for negotiations and moreover, supported the draft settlement of the proposed ukraine, ukraine shook hands and said early and since then many times since last spring , all summer into early autumn . western representatives of the official said in all directions that it was too early to start negotiations ukraine needs to be given more weapons so that it can start negotiations from a stronger stoltenberg position. he said bluntly, literally the other day , the general became that the arming of ukraine is the path to peace. but in fact

, delensky puts forward some completely absurd initiatives - plans from ten points, where everything that can be piled up on food security, energy and biological security, and the withdrawal of russian troops from everywhere and the repentance of the russian federation of the tribunal of condemnation. well , and so on. and there can be no talk with zelensky well, at least, because he legally forbade negotiating with the russian government. so, all this chatter, western, that they are ready. but we, uh, it's all from the evil one you asked, what are the prospects for negotiations between russia and the west on the ukrainian issue, and we will be ready to

respond to any serious proposals with a serious proposal, for now. we don't see. we will be ready to consider them and decide and, of course, we hear the spell of western capitals that not a word about ukraine without ukraine, all this is all nonsense, because in fact it decides for ukraine. they also forbade zelensky to agree with russia at the end of march last year, when such an agreement was already ready without ukraine. not the time, and now they say, the same thing needs more weapons. we need to deplete the russian federation more, but i don’t know who is in charge of military planning there, but there was a meeting between cia director burns and sergey naryshkin, director of the foreign

intelligence service. he talked about her in general features. uh, biden suggested it. the meeting was proposed by the president. putin agreed. it took place and there were no revelations there . and the west, in principle, with paradic rare contacts that occur at one level or another, does not say anything. what would go beyond the scope of his public statements, therefore, our positions are well known. only in ukraine it probably makes no sense. the west is using ukraine to destroy the security system that existed in the euro-atlantic for many, many years and which was based on

the principles of consensus on the indivisibility of security, the solution of all issues through dialogue and cooperation, and the embodiment of these ideals was the organization for security and cooperation in europe, which is now the west, and is heavily buried in the same way as it was buried. uh, practically buried the council of europe and the organizations that were created for dialogue and the search for consensus, the search for compromises. by definition, it is now used to promote the same course for the total domination of the united states and , under them, the rest of the west in everything and everywhere. so talk to us. let's do it well, we'll think of something with ukraine for everything else, it will be ours, we will need an

honest conversation. and i think, in principle, at this stage, we do not need to show any initiatives in those areas that we closed ourselves, including closing the cooperation in the council of europe, which everyone was so proud of. uh, moreover, there are several conventions on the europe website, several dozen conventions that are not required. being a member of the council of europe but allowing you to participate in these conventions. so the west has decided to cancel russia here too and are building a discriminatory barrier to the participation of our representatives in the work of the relevant bodies of these conventions, which are open to non-members of the council of europe in this situation, in fact. the cases put forward unacceptable conditions for the participation of our representatives in review events under these conditions, of course, we will not put up with these. recently, for this reason, they withdrew from the convention on

combating corruption. this does not mean that we have stopped fighting corruption, which means that only one thing we don't want, uh, to sit on a side chair in the relevant body. and, uh, listen to listen to western notations, when we are infringed, and even in our procedural rights, but i can give examples for a long time. let's live like this, someone else is allowed to ask a question. is there such an opinion among many europeans? that russia didn't show its best side by deciding to go, er, to military action. so what, u

act like u, the other imperialist countries in this way? let us suppose, the united states that was mentioned, uh, which, by the way, bombed almost half of the planet. and what in the same way violates, uh, international law in such a way as to seize certain territories, uh, and you know, such criticism is very much more than mentioned in greece, in cyprus, in the balkans, with beams, and due to the fact that we are also victims of such a policy. uh, you are one of the best at such, probably, the kiev issue is a threat to the aegean sea from the side. turkey against greece, and such a wording, such an argumentation sounds very much to us, as it were argued, if possible, with such a position. well

, i'm not going to argue, i'll just state my opinion when they said that russia did not show its best qualities when it launched a special military operation - this is hmm such an interesting wording. well, to finally put an end to this topic once again. we showed our best qualities. well, after the soviet union , president putin spoke about this many times. and in 2000, immediately after being elected president, one of his first foreign visits, e, was a trip to germany where he spoke in the bundestag in german and thus he personally fit in. personally, how is putin

as a person? in the national historical reconciliation between germany and our country, this reconciliation took place at the beginning in the late eighties in the early nineties with the fall of the berlin wall with the unification of germany yes , it was such a reconciliation at the state level at the official level, and putin personally invested in this historical application of the russians germans, let's not forget that germany became united first of all, and thanks to the soviet union, because the other powers the winners of this are not strong. i wanted to put it mildly , and we were ready and showed our best sides, as you said in terms of respect for international law in terms of finding solutions that would be for the benefit of all europe of all mankind. a very

long, very long time. i've given examples, the first ukrainian maidan in 2004 , when official europe said ukraine should choose europe or with us. it was 3 years before the munich speech, even then we expected that reason would triumph and europe would understand that it was impossible you can’t constantly deceive, you can’t constantly move the same nato to the east, contrary to the promises that you made, you can’t do it. this is not only contrary to verbal promises, it cannot be done contrary to the obligations that were written down in the osce, no one strengthens his security at the expense of the security of others and not a single organization. the osce cannot claim a dominant role in space. it is written under this that there are signatures of the heads of

state and greece of the united states of russia , and this is the formula that no one should to claim dominance in europe is written in the documents of russia's nato summit at the highest level. and if you think that nato's reckless advance despite our official protests is the fulfillment of this obligation. well then, of course, uh, we can hardly understand each other here, but i'm sure you don't think so, that you understand perfectly well what is at stake. and here you said that we behaved in the same way as the rest of the imperialist countries. yes, we are now again called the empire. i leave these terms to uh, discretion professionals professionals. we, uh, are a country where a huge number of nationalities live, where one and a half to one and a half hundred

languages. and where almost all world religions are represented. and where there is, respect for the national traditions of each of the peoples, and we, as many national multi-confessional countries, have been developing for more than one hundred years. ah, and unlike western e colonial practices, we have never suppressed the peoples that were part of the russian empire. we never destroyed them. we never threw them into a a melting pot so that they all lose their identity of steel identity. uh, well, the americans. eh, all on one face of this one and they didn’t succeed. how can you be sure lately? here, in our country, all those who joined the russian empire, all retained their e, customs, traditions of

originality, customs, languages, and so on. what about? that's the territory grab that we have the same instincts as the western empires you know in the united states i've said about 300 times i think. here after the uh offensive uh after the end of the cold wars are so conventionally the nineties, but they invaded foreign territory in most cases. uh, the target was, uh, one of the americans. someone offended. this happens regularly in central america in particular in the caribbean, or was the goal. eliminate threats to peace and security

, for example, allegedly had weapons of mass destruction, so that later it turned out they simply wanted to destroy gaddafi, who seemed to them not a democrat, but a dictator and destroyed iraq or prosperous countries that lived very, very well from the point of view the social economic situation in yugoslavia is simple. decided to destroy the balkans, including for the sake of germany, by the way, which did not even wait until the european union worked out a single line, but simply took and recognized croatia and slovenia. and thereby made the process irreversible, cut off all possibilities. at least recreate it somehow. uh, confederate or whatever. uh, the format between the balkan countries as well. uh, serbia

opposed, uh, that the alkans should submit to submit to the west, and what serbia did, by the way, joe biden as a senator, and a year before the start of nato aggression against serbia, he declared in the ninety-eighth year. i advocate that we bombed belgrade. i propose to send american pilots and blow up all the bridges over the river, drina. they simply take away all their oil reserves. and uh, you see all the demands of senator biden, a year later in 1999, they were fulfilled, and time magazine came off the cover. and nothing and no tribunals there. no one

thought about it, just as no one thought about any tribunals when the united states invaded syria without uh, any legitimate reason and became to compare cities with the earth, for example, the city of rakka, was completely destroyed, and there tens of hundreds of corpses lay without any care, but for months. and yes, there are some kind of international community doctors without borders, reporters without borders, they said something somewhere, but there was no talk of any tribunals . and when and when the international criminal court, suddenly decided to investigate, e data on the commission of war crimes by the americans in afghanistan, the united states simply told the international criminal court we will put you all under sanctions your money, which is in american banks

and all this high body of international justice. just shut up. that's why you can compare, of course, but we defended, as i already said, that we defended our security, because ukraine was made into a springboard for an attack on russia to undermine our interests. uh, already planned in the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bazov. uh, the construction of naval bases, first of all, uh, anglo-saxon is. this is a serious thing and secondly, but of course, the humiliation of the russians, who are guaranteed by the constitution of ukraine right. but it is unacceptable, because they are our compatriots, they associate with us the protection of their legitimate interests guaranteed even by

the constitution of ukraine and when the coup d'etat inspired by the west in the fourteenth year. no way uh caused even attempts to forge. in general, the national dialogue in ukraine, when the west unequivocally sided with the regime, which proclaimed its anti-russian goals, immediately proclaimed its commitment to the principles and theory and practice of nazism. when they bombed odessa , they bombed lugansk and no one is investigating these crimes and there are no tribunals. no one even thinks of surrendering, and when finally this war against those who did not accept, the coup d'état was stopped, the minsk agreements were signed. and you know how germany france along with e. poroshenko

signed all three, except for putin, they said that we signed it that way, only to gain time, so that the ukrainians could supply more weapons, so that they would be better prepared for the next phase of the war. this is how you think that we have not shown our the best sides. we were the only ones who sought the fulfillment of these unfortunate, and the minsk agreements. all the rest were simply cheaters in this situation and, of course, followed the advice of the americans about the fact that fading, cyprus also suffers more from this. we are always with the greeks. we were very close friends with the cypriots. and , uh, those tomorphoses that happened to

the leadership of both countries. of course, we noted, we noted everything that i just listed about how it accumulated over the years. here this line accumulated strength in order to start a hybrid war against us. this is all known. i can’t even imagine that people holding the posts of prime ministers of the presidents of european countries, and especially countries that have long historical ties with the russian federation, that these people do not know the facts or do not know how to analyze them, therefore the conclusion that i draw from the position , which occupied european countries, including some greece, means only one thing, that they were forced, or they themselves willingly agreed to submit to american dictates. all europe

built by the united states, no one will allow europe to speak of any strategic autonomy anymore. and when? us secretary of defense mr. austin was here a year ago, when there was a discussion about the need for more american troops to be sent to europe . he was asked if this should be done on a permanent basis on a rotational basis. well, he says, well, we in washington will decide that no one will ask europe, so we have drawn conclusions for ourselves . and, of course, we will draw conclusions regarding those who so quickly, but listened to him, supported e aggression against the russian federations once this war will end, we will still defend our truth.