the whole of europe has been built by the united states to dictate. no one in europe will allow any more talk of strategic autonomy, and when the us secretary of defense, mr. it is necessary on a permanent basis on a rotational basis. well, he says, well, we in washington will decide that no one will ask europe, so we have drawn conclusions for ourselves. and, of course, we will draw conclusions about those who quickly, but helpfully supported uh aggression against the russian federation, once the war is over. we will still defend our truth, but how to continue to live. i still can't

imagine everything will depend on what conclusions europe will draw, please, georgia alteinfo now we are ready to hear yes good afternoon sergey viktorovich altenhublici tv company. mr. minister, after the start of our own in ukraine, we all observe what is real this is the confrontation of the collective west in our country, the russian federation and not only uh, but also the small countries of the region found themselves in a difficult situation, including georgia and the constant radical attacks by political and media groups, and controlled by the americans, are trying to instill the immoral perverse

values ​​of western norms of behavior. what is alien to our culture and identity, thus the west is trying to undermine the cultural sovereignty of small countries and gain control over them, and the ultimate goal of this cynical globalist policy is to sacrifice these small countries for the sake of their political interests. here is a sad example. uh, unfortunately, ukraine is the same danger stands before georgia and other countries in the region. and uh, the question arises under these conditions, the island. eh, question. does russia have a clear strategy against the destructive cultural expansion of, uh, the west, and does that involve cooperating with countries that might be natural allies in defending conservative values? thank you very much uh the question is very broad as well.

we just talked about ukraine yesterday there was a special meeting of the security council, it was created on our initiative and dedicated to the threats to international peace and security that stem from the policies of the kiev regime. in the field of human rights in the field of the rights of national minorities, including the religious rights of national minorities. and e need. here you see, here is a cultural uh, cultural presence. uh, countering negative trends through the preservation of traditional values. after all, this is all directly connected, and with religion, too, from the activities of the orthodox church and the russian orthodox church and the georgian orthodox church. and and when in ukraine this one is not an instrument of russian influence, but simply this institution of preserving the traditions of the history of the transmission of

these traditions from generation to generation, when it simply collapses and is prohibited, the clergy are subject to arrest and lose their citizenship. these are the methods by which the west is fighting to assert its values. ah, we are forced, well, to answer mirrored in those cases when we say our journalists, our political scientists, politicians uh, well-known and uh, capable of carrying the truth uh in foreign foreign audiences uh let down under sanctions, we are forced to start reciprocity for this is not at all our choice, even during the cold war, and soviet and american scientists met regularly. uh, they discussed topical issues of our time. now

there is practically no such possibility, and er, here. i'll just say to me. uh, sometimes they turn so timidly through absolutely unofficial channels . some of the uh, representatives of the political thought of the west ask. is it possible to organize a seminar somewhere? in the central territory, so that yours and ours come. ah, no one before did not ask this. one institute simply negotiated with other institutes. and now our western partners who participated in these exchanges. they're just scared and, uh, hounded them hard enough. er, that's why i say again that i will have great respect for the position of the georgian orthodox church, which upholds these values. and

in general, we have no problems with the georgian people. yes, there was, uh, the story of 2008, connected with the fact that, again, nato played its role, when in april itself lieutenants of bucharest adopted a declaration where it was said that georgia ukraine will be in nato saakashvili obviously absolutely i do not want to be expressed in jargon. well, in general, somehow his emotions went off, and he decided that all this was an indulgence, and there was also condoleezza rice arriving a month before he gave the order, uh, bombijtshenval and positions of peacekeepers. well, it took the ukrainians a little longer for this bucharest impulse to come to the realization of those people

who decided to expel everything russian from their territory. here, ah, but we are for abkhazia to build south ossetia, uh, relations with georgia there are mechanisms for dialogues in which we also participate, and the georgian side is singled out. quite a long time ago, the project of carrying out joint economic activities through this to strengthen trust is all a very, very useful thing, and it's true. now e western participants, the so-called geneva discussions between georgia and abkhazia south ossetia. this is the european union, the united nations, the osce, the united states, they are somehow trying to make this format of dialogue a hostage of what is happening around ukraine hmm that's not indecent. i consider it unprofessional. uh, this means that they

are doing specific tasks in a particular region , uh, they are conditioned by their political grievances and whims. here, but i 'm glad that we have people-to-people contacts with georgia actively developing. last year i was told georgia's gdp grew by 10%, uh thanks in large part to, uh, tourism and trade relations with the russian federation , hopefully we can resume direct flights soon. well, that's probably so, but we see how georgia, as far as georgia, like practically other countries, is under pressure from the west, which demands directly openly publicly join the sanctions against the russian federation and that a small country and its government. uh,

has the courage to say, uh, that we will be guided by our own interests interesting our economy. this commands respect. please, iceland sergeevich good afternoon and good afternoon to all of you. you just talked about the fact that masha's brooch is not western in connection with these two issues, how do you e enough would have commented, well, the frank statement of sauli and ninists. this is mr. president of finland on new year's eve when he compared the russian federation to the brutal nazi regime. this is the second question. soviet times often spoke to imperialism in cornices and so on. and these words will be heard more and more often. uh, there is also a new liberalism for illness, uh, and

so on. these are the words, they are 30 years old, jesusganov and the communist party are talking. but as soon as they have the president knock e deficit. how would, how could they determine who opposes russia today, uh, that is, this is understandable. i am not relevant today and in history they have not gone anywhere in the new year's performance and in the subsequent one more interview with the recent president of the ninja. well, just like in the case of greece and cyprus, uh, we proceeded from the fact that in finland for many years it has been a model of friendly relations between countries since the time when it was called the coexistence of countries with different social political systems and the

speed with which finland, like sweden own in finland surprised me more, but with which finland, uh, abruptly changed. well , rhetoric, but, apparently, there is a change of position behind this, or this position has always been, but such an anti-russian one was simply well camouflaged with beautiful phrases, and the need for a common european house of respect from the principles of the helsinki final act, and the expediency of e in 2025 to collect in helsinki themselves. devoted to the 75th anniversary of the creation of both c e, i don’t know, but, of course, i was surprised by this statement, as for? he is straight compared. here is putin, just like stalin attacked finland, putin also attacked ukraine, and just like stalin in finland, putin in ukraine

will lose such a rather primitive monologue, to be honest. allusions to fascist germany probably reflect the fact that mr. ninist often thinks about this, and it seems to me that finns should remember history well. and the fact that they , in fact, were not at all, but not at all innocent victims of the processes that took place before, the second world war and after it began, is a pity. it's a pity that everything created in europe with a largely leading role in finland, now collapsed overnight

to a large extent by the efforts of finland itself . but we are neighbors. uh, you can’t change that here, given that finland is so zealous and delighted, but is eager to join nato and says that this will guarantee its security. well, as we said, we will have to draw conclusions from the accession of finland and sweden. and if it is donated and we will take appropriate military-technical measures on our side of the border already huh? the second question i don't realism mentioned. it was your neighbor who asked me that we are behaving like other imperial powers - this is a matter of taste. what about

colonial habits? a real assessment of what the west is now trying to do clanic colonialism. it's when you capture someone and live at his expense. well, you can capture it in different ways, as in the 18th century you could stuff slaves into a ship. or you can just bend to your will. all the plans and programs of this or that country or this or that structure. how are the americans now doing with the european union? the european union already? you do not members of the european union of iceland you are lucky and the european union has now completely lost its independence. this is in fact an attribute of nato in the european union, already public

statements are breaking through that we are being discriminated against by the administrators of the french economy and saying that, in some way, uh, the americans must be encouraged to be more attentive to our interests, and then the industry in europe pays four times more for gas than the industry in the usa well, in general, the transition to liquefied natural gas, despite price fluctuations, which in the number we are now seeing in the long term, it certainly means a serious rise in price. uh, production in europe, and by the way, it's very funny to say that many, many years ago , the europeans began to demand that we not sign long-term contracts and switch to spot pricing. eh, but now, when the ukrainian events began, when

they decided to look for new sources of energy, they began to negotiate in the frame, qatar said with pleasure, please, at least 15 years. the europeans went to negotiate with the united states yesterday as well. so i read messages in the united states , they also said that please, we will give you good prices, but only within the framework of long-term contracts. therefore, after all, reliability, uh, the ability to have some kind of sustainable perspective, is more important than following zigzags every day on one or another of this or that exchange, but the industry is european. uh, some political scientists, including western ones, are already starting to move to the united states, they say that one of them is with the goal of everything that is happening, including with

the goal of what is happening around ukraine is a sharp decline in the competitiveness of europe. and this is like a step towards then reducing the competitiveness of china and others. e rivals in global markets. therefore, yes, and of course, colonialism is fully manifested in relations with developing countries . see where american investment is going. they are necessarily accompanied either by some political demands or by the deployment of american troops. i do n't see much difference here, but we're just on press conferences. i know that many scientists are already studying this phenomenon. uh, here is colonialism

in the new conditions. he didn’t even have a rhyme, but purely in che-cloned in its purest form from the point of view of purpose and task. and use resources to your advantage. in a good sense of the word, newcomers in the hall, if you will allow the portal. hello look not for olga thanks for the opportunity to ask him questions, maybe better at the end. well, as you see fit, and diplomacy has a large number of tools in the first place in a word by sergey viktorovich please tell me, in your opinion, in 2022 in the world of diplomacy. what was the most tragic word? what a hopeful and what a word the whole world needs to hear today, thank you. not such a lyrical question, but we are somehow more. uh,

think specifically about things, rather describe what we do. perhaps we would have asked you, uh. well, such a word. you know, the word war, i'm not afraid to say it, because what is happening is our answer. which , as the president said, perhaps it was necessary to do a little earlier, but this is exactly the answer, and he was not late, it is important for that hybrid war that they unleashed against us and under the slogan that the west is now promoting its agenda in a variety of variations. well, the word that gives hope, this is victory and the third what word

came out? today i think he should hear the word victory of those who want to hear the word of negotiations about them, unfortunately, they themselves do not want these negotiations and, uh, they manipulate this term in every possible way in order to drag out this war. as long as possible against russia has a lot of arabic arabic language media. let's start with artie and arabica. my name is kassamart sergey viktorovich in your opinion. what is the place of the arab state of revision? turn towards these countries thank you we

maintain regular contacts both through bilateral channels and with the league of arab states and the cooperation council of the arab states of the gulf just yesterday. i had another meeting with all the ambassadors. uh member countries of the arab league. and uh in may was uh, headquarters in the apartment or yaransky the statesman in his career also spoke there in front of all member countries, and i see , firstly, an understanding of our position, an understanding that this is far from only and not at all about ukraine, but about the struggle for a new world order between those who believe that he

must be completely subordinate to their rules, and the rules involve the dominance of the united states by their satellites and those who want the world order to be democratic. after all, i have already spoken about this more than once to the western countries, which constantly, uh, at every corner demand that all democracies have in mind exclusively personally on the internal structure of this or that state. at the same time, of course, you don’t even have the right to ask a question about democracy in the united states . although here are the latest studies on how the elections were held there, how the dead were elected, like one, uh, however, he says in a word received twice as many votes, than in her precinct voters are registered, and voting by mail and many, many other things, but this cannot be done. but as soon as you

start talking about democracy with them international relations. they are going away. and they don't want it. they want the world to have rules. not international rights that ensure democracy, where each country is sovereignly equal, but the rules where they dictate everything. here is how the nato declaration of the european union says in the interests of the golden billion. here from the jungle, so you need to protect and worship them e, use e. none of the arab countries joined the sanctions, despite the unprecedented severe pressure from the west, and i would say unceremonious, and even somewhere self- degrading pressure that the west is exerting when i was in the league of arab states, and before my speech , the secretary general

told me that the delegation came to them 3 days before my arrival western words. which demanded to cancel my performance. well , when they got a polite answer. e that this is impossible and we are friends with russia, then they demanded that after my speech, every member of the league of arab states and condemn russian aggression, the answer is that we have each sides have their own position. they define it themselves and the third request, which i consider self-humiliating for the west. well, at least don't take pictures. and, moreover, it is then employees. here is the secretary. they put it on paper and everyone, and they sent it to the embassy for information that they received such dimash well , uh, i don’t want to say that somehow it

flattered me, but for the sake of history, i note that after my speech it lasted more than an hour . and i was asked to take a separate photo of each of these words. that's why it's a trifle like, but it's a trifle on the reel. now he is in many other countries, in particular in europe, and it would take remarkable political courage. we are developing relations with the arab world. and in ascending order, of course, we must also take into account in trade and economic relations, first of all, illegal sanctions. this is the agony that we are now witnessing from those who are in charge of the international monetary financial system. we are building new supply chains that are protected from these colonizers more and more to the calculation in

there are many of us in national currencies. of global projects in egypt, of course, a nuclear power plant is being created e zone, there are many projects in the russian industrial zone with russian participation, and e in algeria with morocco there are long-term plans with almost all african countries there are intergovernmental commissions by arab countries, 10 intergovernmental commissions on trade and economic cooperation, and uh, at the level of foreign policy departments, we have a forum for russian arab dialogue, and because of the pandemic, we haven’t could meet. full-time. now. here we are discussing with the staff of the league of arab states the holding of the next ministerial meeting either in the region in one of the countries of the region at the discretion of our

partners, or we are always ready to accept in the russian federation. and, of course, speaking of the arab world, one cannot fail to mention. uh, the obvious dissatisfaction of our colleagues with the fact that the west daily demands something about ukraine and does nothing at all. e on the palestinian problem. it is this that causes a very deep chagrin that palestine yes and as a matter of fact, or viysky regulation, uh, which, after the west destroyed libya, did not stagger, this one is marking time, but there are problems in iraq, and that’s all. these are other problems of the region. of course, for the west they are of secondary importance to that third power. compared to the fact that it is imperative to exhaust russia and inflict

a strategic defeat on it. and we appreciate that our uh, uh colleagues see that we have a different position, we do not abandon our efforts both on the palestinian uh issue and on syria levi's regulation of iraq. we are now planning high-level contacts with our arab colleagues. here it is very important not to forget those conflicts, and which , in particular, the palestinian one, is the oldest unresolved conflict on earth, and here the general stadium could also be a little more active as one of the participants in the quartet of international mediators to promote this agenda. sergeyevich, you

reminded the city and the aggressive policy of the united states, which turned this city into ruins. i wanted to ask, these are illegal and unjust and even unilateral sanctions against the syrian people and the occupation of part of parts of syrian land. e, prolongs the duration of the crisis in syria and e, exacerbates the living conditions of the syrian people. how did you see you or uh, would you explain. that is precisely the violation that these are their satellites of international and humanitarian law against the syrian people on their historical land. thank you thank you

very much. well, here you can talk for a long time. of course, sanctions are not acceptable, of course. this is another example of how western ranting that their sanctions are not affect the common people are lies to make people feel worse, and to make people rebel against their governments. it 's such a thing. uh yes there are humanitarian exceptions and uh if you look at the amount of humanitarian aid that goes to syria uh based on the parameters he deems necessary