prohibition return of refugees to their e historical land. thank you thank you very much. well, here you can talk for a long time. of course, sanctions are unacceptable, of course. this is yet another example of how the western rant that their sanctions don't affect ordinary people is a lie. the sanctions are exactly aimed at making people worse off and causing people to rebel against their governments. it 's such an obvious banal thing. uh. yes, there are humanitarian exceptions and, uh, if you look at the amount of humanitarian aid that goes to syria, and if start from those parameters that he considers necessary. and what actually

comes in syria is about half? this is one of the worst indicators, uh, among all humanitarian programs, really does not want to return refugees to syria, even the department of refugee affairs a couple of years ago distributed in the syrian refugee camp. which led directly to the fact that it’s bad in syria and it’s better to stay in lebanon, we made a scandal in front of us, they apologized, this questionnaire was withdrawn, but this shows how it relates to refugees of the international so-called community. again, there is a political divide here. resolution 22:54 does indeed involve holding elections, which should be with the participation of the entire syrian

population, and so on and so forth. the west really wants when it comes to these elections, although the syrian uh syrian arab republic held its own elections. and uh, without any interference from the west, but the west is hoping at some stage to impose some kind of huge elections with the participation of refugees and so on refugees. they know how to ensure the correct vote in favor of already, probably, some kind of opposition that they feed. mm, this thing is also an obvious and unsightly thing, but you gradually know, just as the americans realized that, uh, it is pointless to cultivate some kind of guaido for venezuela and that you need to really work with those who uh have the mandate of the people? right now, the same trends are manifesting in

relation to bashar, assad, the americans have syrians, and closed contacts on prisoners of war, but other countries, including turkey, for example, as you know advocated for something to normalize relations with the damascus president, erdogan said he was ready to meet with the massive president asked us to promote made up a ministerial meeting, turkey's defense of syria pro-russian. uh, assistance is preparing meetings of the arab countries’ foreign ministers, either they didn’t leave syria leaving their embassies there, or now they have returned their embassies there, the united arab emirates, for example, is also a country that has a very rich mediation experience and, uh, everything, more or more use it in good. we appreciate this very much, so life will force, uh, to consider all these issues

based on realities, and not from some ideal picture that someone draws for themselves there in their geopolitical, but building them, but one of the main problems is - the agreements were fulfilled. about the inadmissibility of preservation. there terrorists are still northeast. yes, there needs to be established contacts between the government and the kurds, we understand the concerns of our turkish colleagues, and we understand this problem, uh, their irritation the fact that in the united states, on the contrary, they want to use the kurds there, and in order, firstly, to create a quasi-state in the east of syria, and secondly, for these kurds to carry out the instructions of washington and, uh, constantly create

some kind of irritant in the region. just recently , my colleague, minister cavusoglu, recalled that in 2019 russia signed a memorandum with turkey, according to which we are obliged to help the kurds to work. chile moved away from the turkish border at certain distances. well, according to become search by analogy with the well-known adana agreement back in the 1990s and 1980s. ah, and uh, mr. cavusoglu my good friend said that russia has not yet completed everything to the end. we are right, this is a difficult question, but we had other agreements with the turks. uh, in addition to the north of the east, yes , putin and erdogan signed an agreement on a protocol and for turkey they pledged to stop surveying,

the opposition cooperating with the turkish republic from jabhatara, a and its other e incarnations, but so that the terrorists could not feel free there agreed. we then also at the same at the same at the same time in the eighteenth- on the joint patrolling of the russian-turkish m4 road to aleppo, this is also, until we succeed, therefore, uh, we need to continue to achieve the agreed tasks, but they fully retain their relevance and and the issues of syria's economic recovery play a very important role, and the west, by all means, by truth or false, trying to keep the supply channels of humanitarian supplies without the control of damascus, and through the turkish border. we have now left only one

such point and left it only with provided that the legal, defined by international law method of delivering humanitarian aid, that is, through the government of the syrian arab republic , will increase and what will happen? hidden opportunities to finance early recovery projects, that is, not just to supply food and medicine, but to repair hospitals to repair schools to provide water supply of energy. we were promised this, not just promised, but a resolution on this security was adopted, including the active support of the americans. here for the second year now. uh, we see a very small progress uh, and this is also a task that he should more actively solve. another question from the region is the american company

mm and n. pirosal-mardini tv company mbn, uh medley sergeev petrovich relations between russia and the united states are not at their best. eh, condition. and what, from the point of view of russia, does washington need to do in order to return relations to the previous level, and how much, uh, such tense relations between russia and the united states interfere with, uh, growls other crises, for example, syria libya iran thank you. well, always when two influential countries, and not cooperating, but now they don’t even talk to each other and always. this affects their ability to help solve the thuja, well,

the international problem, where it is necessary to combine efforts, is an effective factor that is required in order for these relations, uh, to return to normal, well, i don’t even know the norms, this is such a concept. eh, it won't be the way it was. and now, on every corner, stoltenberg said that there will no longer be a relationship between russia and nato and with the west. eh, as they were in the past. we have long said that there will never be more situations guys when you lie to us. subscribe to the documents refuse to comply with them, as was the case with the declaration of the russian council, as was the case with the istanbul declaration of the osce with the declaration of the osce adopted at the summit in astana in 2010, as was the case with

the agreement on the settlement of the crisis in ukraine in february of the fourteenth year who guaranteed germany france and poland as it was with the minsk agreements that were not only signed by germany and france, but also approved. i can see in our eyes that the security of the un is all these agreements. the west was not even going to comply. they just lied to our faces, signing at the level of presidents and prime ministers. these are the most solemn obligations. that's why, well , we have already stopped believing in a word. we understand why, on the basis of well, in russia there was such an order, when the merchants agreed, about something they did not sign anything, they shook hands and that's it. after, if you don't, then no one will even respect you. but here we are weaned from this. after we promised not

to expand nato, and then we began to sign political documents, even legally binding ones, because the resolution is security and according to the minsk agreements. it is a legally binding document. now we are being called. uh, including the americans , russia must withdraw from ukraine to perform in full. the un charter states, inter alia, among other things, that all members of the un are obliged to comply with resolutions with this security. here is the resolution of the security council on ukraine was sabotaged and simply did not allow the conflict to be regulated so that there was no new suffering in the framework of current events. this is an obvious thing for me, by the way, now here are our western friends too. uh, some time ago, we had a

decision of the general assembly that every time someone uses a veto in the security council, the general assembly should meet within 10 days on the same topic and listen what were the motives for using veta we agreed with us there is nothing to open. we are all our own, voting, all voting decisions, we always explain it this way, but another question arises. and why does the general assembly not want to consider the issue of those resolutions that no one supervised, that were adopted. but no one does them. well, for example, resolutions on palestinian regulation. they have also been adopted by the security council. they even have a unanimous resolution, they forgot about them, and the general assembly, as it were, means, well, they are there, when they discuss palestine, they lament over about their implementation. and here is a special

meeting. and why they didn’t comply with the resolution that approved the minsk agreements on ukraine, no, it doesn’t occur to anyone, or rather, it comes to mind, of course, but no one needs it instead , but some are discussing it completely. uh, phantasmagoric ideas about the creation of a tribunal, about the creation of some kind of reparations mechanism with the russian federation . the ukrainians and their patron e need no more than that. not the whole word tribunal, but he ate without a letter, how tribunes need tribunes, from where they shake the air, nothing else. that's why we didn't destroy relations with the united states, the united

states after the meeting of biden and putin in geneva in june 2021. incidentally, we agreed to say that they confirmed gorbachev reagan's formula that there can be winners in a nuclear war and that it should never be unleashed. we actively promoted this, the americans agreed. it must be given credit that the biden administration, unlike the trump administration, immediately supported this statement. what allowed us , six months later, in january 2022, to make the same statement about the inadmissibility of nuclear war, on our initiative on behalf of the leaders of all five nuclear powers and the second agreement after the baidan meeting with putin, was the beginning of a strategic dialogue on what could replace treaty on strategic

offensive arms, which are currently in force, expire at the beginning of 2026. started a strategic dialogue with the participation of diplomats of military intelligence services held 22 rounds meetings in july, in my opinion, and the second in september 21 more or less there. it was clear. in what direction to move further , the organizational forms of further discussion were discussed - this is also important, but suddenly, after september, the americans interrupted this strategic dialogue. uh, and when they say now, we need to resume it, we didn’t break it. this dialogue is generally not one of the directions of our contacts of our interaction. we didn't tear it to the united states to run after them and say,

let's be friends again, we're not going to. they know that we are serious people always for serious treatment. we will answer seriously. here biden asked putin to meet with burns, the meeting took place. yes , it was quite helpful. no breakthroughs though. she did not bring, but the dialogue itself is a serious dialogue, not a meeting in order to accuse someone of all mortal sins, but serious conversations for his respectful ones. it's always helpful. that's why it's not up to us. sergey viktorovich good afternoon ramina zeynalova informational tass agency here, in continuation of the topic of us relations, uh, we would like to clarify whether there is already an understanding? when will the

new us ambassador arrive in russia and how far is the prospect of resuming work today? thanks, i don't know when the new ambassador will arrive. she has already passed the hearing. she already seems to have completed everything there, the formality of the formality, so it’s up to the american side. she has an agriman, there are no obstacles for her arrival from our side . and as for the conditions in which the embassy works, just like uh, in the case of the previous question. we have never started, never started any actions to hinder the work of diplomats. and everything that we are now seeing was for something nobel laureate

barack obama in december 2016, 3 weeks before trump's inauguration, obama leaves the white house. i decided simply. well, you know, it's so petty to hurt your replacement. selected five objects of our property expelled our diplomats. and uh. you know, they kicked out like that, well, it's unscrupulous. them. these were frames and press conferences by russian foreign minister sergey lavrov on the results of 2022 and on this topic. we'll be back in a few minutes. today is the 80th anniversary of the breaking of the siege of leningrad, president vladimir putin takes part in commemorative events he met with veterans of the great patriotic war from the inhabitants of besieged leningrad

of the civilian population of the soviet union are extremely important, of course, this issue was considered at one time in nuremberg and, in general, assessments were given, but this is precisely in general, because it was impossible to imagine the nuremberg trials e, all even to consider and present everything facts, uh, testifying to this genocide and really forgets a lot in general. you know, maybe i'll say no ordinary things to want, nothing out of the ordinary. here. no, this is some kind of protective mechanism of nature. we have a person forgets everything very quickly. forgetting everything very quickly , new generations already perceive what was before the birth of man as some kind of prehistoric events that seem to have nothing to do with him. it has nothing to do with it, but in order for a person to understand that this is not

so, we certainly must deal with this. and so i say, on the one hand, it’s not bad that a person does not live under the yoke of difficult memories. it would be impossible. it would be it would be a terrible terrible thing existence. so hmm well, just imagine yourself scary, but the historical memory must to be preserved precisely in order to prevent such tragedies that our people experienced during the great patriotic war. you have never repeated, and that we have practical sense, so that we can respond in time to the threats that arise in the relations of our country. these are very important things, so we will certainly work in all areas. first of all, of course, you need to pay. uh, attention to young people and of course, through those uh and uh means that are

most intelligible to uh young people in order for them to better perceive it, but the most, of course, in uh, the most effective is the remembrance of those who went through this hardest test, because you correctly said, well, in life and life, many are no longer there, veterans, uh, but uh, those who are still, uh, who has the power? of course, we all must do everything we must do in order to use your knowledge, because these are no longer books that can be rewritten. to state something there, in a way that is beneficial to someone. and this is the testimony. here is the first part of the second. uh, of course already use these experiences teaching staff of teachers at different levels. now what you said about the

multinationality of the occupying forces, and those who opposed us fought against us against our enemies. yes it is so it has always been so open enough. uh, leo tolstoy and read war and peace, when he says that he has come, like, like the french army under uh, napoleon's driver there. but it was all of europe, because by this time. uh, napoleon bonaparte actually brought the whole of continental europe under control and, uh, tolstoy already describes all this there. it was e temporary great patriotic war of 1912 . e of the patriotic war of 1812, the same thing happened again during the great patriotic war of the forty-first forty- fifth year, yes, after hitler e. in fact, he put under control, also the whole of

continental europe, and here hmm, on the leningrad front, they participated in the blockade of leningrad and committed crimes. uh, representatives of very many european countries. we have never e before in a due to a certain tolerance. uh, and in order not to spoil the relationship, do not spoil some kind of background our relations with many countries were not talked about, but it was not only in leningrad on the leningrad front. during the poster. it was everywhere enough to look at the blue division there near stalingrad. yes, and here, in leningrad, on the leningrad front , during the pilgrimage. well, from all sides, yes, from all sides, these participants were from many in any case, but uh, now, when you talk about the need to preserve historical memory, i didn’t already say i fully support this at the state level

we will do we will do persistently. eh, including in order that nothing like i have said this does not happen again. in the meantime, someone with a conscious mind determines all these facts to oblivion. we kind of heard, maybe quite recently , i was invited to the organization to vote. uh, a document condemning the glorification of nazism 50 countries voted against what can be who can be against, and in order to recognize the generalization of nazism as criminal? well, what is it? this , uh, means it's not easy. eh, some historical or political, this is all again transferred here our time for what , in order, based on the current political component. uh, it means to keep such a

common front of pressure on our country. uh, so in this sense, unfortunately, little is changing, which means that we must, uh, consistently defend historical truth and do what you suggest, and we will do so. and now we are returning to the final press conference of the head of the russian mead lee. departure dates? on the day when there was no an airplane from washington and more than a hundred diplomats, wives, children traveled by bus for 6 hours to new york with their belongings loaded there for the whole, but it was petty, you know, unworthy of a person who is called the president of the united states, i told you. after that they called us. uh, trump representatives and they said trump is

not the president yet, but he believes that this was done wrong. we know that you will be responsible. well, wait, don't answer. here you are trump in the white house, and somehow we will try to shake it all up. we took a break for six months, nothing was allowed to him. here shake. even if he wanted to do it. we were forced to answer too expulsion and diplomats too. uh, the imposition of a special regime on a couple of american properties in moscow a. and after that they started to get offended. how so? is that on level ground? you kicked us out of this uneven place. this place has already been heavily flagged by barack obama to begin with. so, uh, like this , the chain reaction started. now we do not have parity. we have uh, ratio of diplomats seriously in favor of the united states because

in the total in the total figure. which is the same for us and for them in our case, includes employees of the russian mission to the un who have nothing to do with russia's bilateral relations with the us and who in other circumstances. well, by and large , they should not have been counted. here in this parity number, they are protected. and this, by the way, is 140 people, so the americans. it's very serious here. uh, such a handicap is serious. and when they cry for about the fact that there is no one to issue a visa do not believe. we have 140 fewer people through bilateral foreign institutions. we did not stop issuing from did not send any of the american citizens to receive a visa to

venezuela or cuba or not by ship, they could. but we're just not small things, we try to be serious people. works sergey viktorovich good afternoon own correspondent of the global television network of china here in russia in moscow dmitry masla. my name is sergey viktorovich china always. well , first of all, there has been a lot of talk lately about world that this world is necessary for our world, says, including the policy of non-confrontation. yes, for its part, it’s not about joining politics, but nevertheless, the west is now actively talking about the russian and chinese alliance in every possible way, uh, it’s scary. sometimes even this alliance of the world. what do you

think, just how is it? it seems to me that this has not yet been discussed, but this is such a typical tactic of the west, uh, everything, what they do not like in every possible way is to break, uh, crush, and so on and so forth. are western attempts to quarrel russia and china being recorded in russia today? perhaps these are some kind of information attacks, perhaps there are compromising evidence or something else? well, in general, such a corporate american style. this is how our relations with the other side of the republic. and, of course, they worry. uh, absolutely the best times. throughout the history of these relations, they have been talking about this, our leaders, president putin, chairman xi jinping. this is recorded in joint documents, the last of which was adopted in february, when the president of russia paid a visit to the people's republic of china, this was a special a

a statement on international relations entering a new era and on global sustainable development. this is a powerful document in which all key worldview issues are reflected and reflected. e in the context of the solidarity of our two countries. do you remember how these attitudes of our chinese friends characterized in their time that this is no? an alliance is not a union, but in many ways it is a stronger allied relationship pragmatic, trusting, mutually respectful and based on a balance of interests, this is exactly what is the ideal format for relations with any with any country and what directly relies on