do everything to develop your production. here we have developed our production by half a step. these half-steps provided him with comfortable conditions. yes, of course, a person is imperfect, therefore, within the framework of antimonopoly regulation, they will have to beat and maybe not only in the head. this, unfortunately, is an inalienable duty of the state in a developed economy to limit the arbitrariness of monopolies, otherwise it is very often considered in our country that the main, almost the only freedom of entrepreneurship is the freedom to rob the consumer by inflating prices, this is erroneous point of view. i have only one question, if we do. they can, for example, turn all our mobile phones into a patent-free zone in response, because by and large there are two monopolists apple and google, and theoretically considering that we put ourselves in such a position. i do not rule out the possibility that at one moment they just do. this is how all devices turn. well, as far as i know, this kind

of work is already underway, because they hacked, even apple's protection is put there by applications sberbank in the branch of sberbank, as far as i understand, there is no such problem, it's another matter, well, let's say so. uh, those people who care about their phones don't turn into pumpkins. but we understand that when we talk about phones, these are not 3.5 smart hackers. and this is several hundred million devices in the country. yes, of course, well, the problem is wider than phones, because if there is a problem with internet routers, i just know what? i’m just not, not, this is the first level that i said, these are these devices. and then we go up and we see that almost all the hardware and almost all the software were brought from the west with unknown bookmarks? and i think that this is connected with the fact that we have to take into account many issues. so, in any case, google has refused to completely

block, so to speak, its app store here. well, it wasn’t just done that way, yes, it’s simple, but when i listen to those people who consider you objectively, they recognize you as experts. they do not give unequivocal answers that such unfriendly actions of impossibility give back. yes, it is possible in many areas. we depend on the critical one many many have in mind, we still do not have, unlike the same iran singer premiere, for example, on countering males and hostile external influences, where i understand that the mantra performs these functions , i i understand that several ministers perform such functions there at once. here are a few other worlds, but nonetheless. se in iran is a separate management system that mainly deals with these, but people are afraid not to go into the forest. of course, advertising.

colleagues very accurately analyzed the president's words and those very important points to which he drew attention. i would like to touch on one more part of the speech, when he drew parallels between what is happening now on the fields of the special operation war and the invasion of our country by hitler a before him and

napoleon in fact. for me it is very important, maybe even more important than uh, that such determination is shown, because in determination. i honestly didn’t even have a doubt at all, because if it weren’t for her it was, we now would not conduct a special war operation, but for me it was very important that the president showed it. and his very deep was shown very symbolically. awareness of the historicity of the moment and its role in history is the present moment of our country, because both periods that have been indicated are periods after which a new world order has developed and after the triumph of the russian empire over napoleon and after the defeat of the nazi invaders in the world there were two new world order, russia was either one of the two or one of the three central states for this new world order, which is very important, the

vienna congresses and the minuses of the pandanian system are also very important, which is also very important, both of these wars are at first the invasion of us is one modernist ideology. this is liberalism in its most aggressive form in the person of napoleon, the march of nazism against us, or as fascism called it in the soviet union. yes, there a more general term was used, this is the second ideology of modernity, and it was also destroyed. and now they are together. and they returned to us. and this, apparently, is the last battle that should destroy the ideologies of modernity and e, or transfer us to a new form of postmodernity, not to the one that is offered to us in the west, but to nika, a new transformed reality in which , on the one hand, we return to our traditions on the other side. so we are entering this new digital world, or we will return to the world that was before modernity at all. this is yet to be seen, but the moment is historical and the president is absolutely aware of this and

very confidently leading our country in this important period, statements have been made over the past few days. here is kissen, he even made a very important statement. if you read between the lines, he speaks more of an idea, he has no reasonable relevance to the neutral status of ukraine. why not, he says, because the neutral status of ukraine was needed so that there would be no what is happening in ukraine now, who proposed to give ukraine a neutral status, so that there would not be what is happening there now in russia in december, russia said, let's discuss and fix ukraine's non-bloc status, this will be an important starting point so that we don't have a clash, who was against it , it was the united states and its henchmen in western states who said that we would not even discuss this. who are you to discuss ukraine with you? ukraine can do what it wants today. ukraine actually no longer exists as a state, therefore, when kissinger says that the

neutral status should not be discussed anymore, it is not worth 70 years to agree with this quality. naturally, i do not agree that he is on fire, as a result, that ukraine's membership in nato is a good result. but the fact that the neutral status of ukraine is no longer a negotiating position, because this issue has completely lost its relevance. this is a fact, just as it is a fact that everything that was proposed before the start of the special operation cannot be a negotiating position that was based on reality. on the land that was in the month of december, then it was rejected. they didn't even discuss it. in the same place, the question was not that we started the discussion did not get off with some kind of conflict started. today they didn’t even discuss it, a year passes in the course of a year, no matter how hard they try to imagine, it’s in a different vein that our opponents russia is achieving great success , we have four new regions in our country, the population in our country has obviously increased we are now having a very successful period at the front and now blinkin says. well,

you know, the only way we can start negotiations. this is your surrender. here is what it offers us. he says you are not until february 24th. he says you go to the border of the ninety-first year. yes, you start paying reparations. you and then we will negotiate, about what if you want our surrender. what kind of negotiations before, i am grateful to linkin for what he clearly gives. that now no one will negotiate before negotiations. therefore, there is simply no alternative to a special military operation at the moment, because we have been repeatedly told from the other side that, in general, the main task of this confrontation for the west is itself self confrontation, not its result some rather endless continuation of this confrontation was a statement. here is the prime minister of the netherlands who repeated

the mantra that the only person who can decide on the start of negotiations and their outcome. this is zelensky and people who apparently do not want to deeply understand what mr. brutus said, they say, here zelensky what an important figure is zelensky’s death sentence to himself because he gives him a fork in fact on behalf of the west fork first, if it comes to the point that we want to end the confrontation with russia you will go and sign everything, possibly yourself. and we will say that well, zelensky is the leader of western democracy, who are we to tell vladimir zelensky what he is signed, what not. and if we want the conflict to continue indefinitely, then we will simply eliminate you, and then there will be no one who could decide to end this conflict, it will turn into a new afghanistan, therefore

, it is the western elites who will be most interested in eliminating zelensky at that moment when it becomes clear what supplies arming something else is already meaningless, that the conflict at school is close. i think then green reality. he will have to worry about his life, because he will have very few chances, in principle, to save it. what is important in this regard is that i want our population to be known all the time in this news agenda in the information agenda. news comes out every 30 seconds, and sometimes we are inside the process without realizing its scale. the president said that in terms of production volume of air defense missiles identical throughout the world. that is, we are equal in terms of the volume of missiles per year to the amount that the entire steel world produces. and in general, we must understand for ourselves that today we are not what air defense missiles have been produced. we completely produce everything on our own, but we are fighting with weapons that are produced by the entire

western world combined. and for me this is fundamentally important, because we often say very much that the west has supported, maybe it will sound somewhat harsh, of course, but for me it is much better that a year and a half later. how much it would take to defeat nato weapons from a tractor, you need nato tactics nato strategy on the territory of ukraine than if we had dealt with the armed forces in 2 weeks, which means they would have participated independently, because if the second happened without nato, in principle, thanks to information propaganda is our enemies. you could imagine how completely insignificant events said, you, well, we are married, we didn’t even lift a finger there, we didn’t participate. and if we wanted to be there for a week this vaunted russian army would now be destroyed by this conversation. i think they actually made a strategic mistake. so deeply, getting involved in this conflict. they left no way out for themselves , because day after day they are now

saying, there the pentagon press secretary says american weapons are today a priority for all countries of the world, why are you bringing them there in batches of just the right variety of types, that is, yes, but they are contradicted by india yes who said no excuse the question. us much more like russian. youtube with the further it goes, the more strange will like the russian they see today on the battlefield. they invest to the maximum, but it does not give them any result. and here they fell into an even greater trap, because initially they set their goals in this confrontation. they tell us, frankly, that they have no task and no opportunity to subject russia to a military defeat, that it is their task, by dragging out the conflict, to cause a revolutionary situation in russia, where to stabilize situation in our country and here it is obvious that this government is not working for them. the government is coping with economic tasks; the security agencies are coping with their tasks ; successfully with them , in fact, here they fell into such a trap

in which these states themselves are leading today. the rating of the most popular leaders of the countries of the european union is coming out . and their salt is under 31% each and how these leaders must find an opportunity to get out of the confrontation in which they dragged the entire european continent, pit it against russia , they must find an opportunity, it means that somehow because of this confrontation to get out, when they said from the very first day that the only option for us - this is the defeat of russia which will not happen. today they are in an absolute impasse. they left themselves no alternative. our next move. this will be a very sure path to the actual defeat of nato as such a geopolitical reality, which until then dominated the world?

a small detail, this applies not only to american weapons. here i have good friends, he is a specialist, he is the head of a computer company of a software company, and he says that our developments of 10-15 years ago are now tearing off the whole world with their hands , not because they are the best, because they are definitely not american and information from these programs will definitely not go to the americans. they live on planes. us director of national intelligence earl hines before 8 said about what will happen next i think we would say that this is not a stalemate at this stage. in fact, a very protracted conflict. we are literally talking about the fact that on the front line the battles are going on for hundreds of meters . analysts expected a certain slowdown in the pace of the operation in the winter month, however. we are seeing some very heavy evrillian fights, because you have shitty analytics, the conflict in ukraine has global

consequences. has implications for us in terms of having to think about the strength of our alliances. this has implications for us in terms of how we we will resolve crises in the future and we do. we are doing this not only for the sake of ukraine itself. this is in our own interest. avril. wow do you think that this is someone who does not understand what you think that someone? ukraine what is interesting? well, it's said the same, it's curious that this tale of an honest girl is practically fired. what story is still for the truth, he says. yes, i'm lying now. i say how i listened to the number of the creator got, the second time they met. yes, lusya caramelka has one letter to herself. it is very short. means, very interesting like this. here we come today. from the usa, in general, a lot of letters come from our youtube channel. we have two

russian youtube channels, but they watch it and there are also english-speaking ones, there are english spanish subtitles. there, in total, only the united states is somewhere in the order of millions of views per month. here. uh. well, here's an interesting letter. just such a translation, of course, hello. this is the usa my name is gabriel bradley i'm from the east coast of the usa i'm a big fan of your film company and youtube channel always thought that the roman people would not be surpassed by masters of cinema and theaters. i am convinced of the importance of your channel, especially today, as we in the us are covered by non-stop anti-russian propaganda. i strive to tell people close to me about the beauty of russian culture through the demonstration of your films. i educate my fellow americans shows that the russian people and their culture is worthy of our greatest admiration, recognition, no news outlet has

the ability to change the hearts and minds of people with the same success as films can and do every day. thank you for everything. what you doing? be strong. take care of yourself. know that there are many people in the usa who are praying for you, see your struggle and desperately hope that you can recover and move forward as a nation, there is no easy way to the stars beyond good loved ones. here is such an interesting letter, judging by the surname, purely anglo-saxon brotherlets. thank you, mr. bradley, of course, we will answer him that it had. i don’t read this anymore, he asks to make a playlist. ah, because we do not have all the films with subtitles, a playlist with english, so that on actually we have i said guys we say he just didn't find we have it so it was easier for him to search but i mean not all is lost in this world

and when we say hello the united states and on the face of the people it is clear that they are different people, but i mean, these are different people. there is a need to remember this, by the way, uh, we have about 50 million views a month and still 20% is ukraine because. we have statistics. so it 's out of fifty million. here count 10 million views. this is ukraine watching, this is and to how important cinema is and how we still underestimate vladimir ilyich , who, back in the eighteenth year, told lunacharsky that cinema is the most important of the arts for us. you understand this once again offended all the circus people, but because there were exact quotes, yes, cinema and the circus, nobody knows his exact quote, as

lunacharsky said to the question, when is lena who does this lenin say to me, was there about circus or not? he does not know, but the temple, this once again indicates that culture is necessary study. this once again speaks of what kind of force there is in the cinema, nothing will be offered with this. there you are completely while more part of the population is more important to us than this art is cinema and the circus. here. well, now so what is it for me it was it's a very good phrase. he has no easy way to the stars. very beautiful phrase very accurately. now hmm next, what do you know? that, in general, is correct, everyone said, i agree with you in everything, but i do not agree. you know when we say they're at an impasse. state

the souls of the people, so that he says such things to him, well, they all sit on the internet, they all know. everything, the masses have information. they understand that our people are smart enough and understand everything, and therefore, it seems to me that, well, we must admit that the situation is difficult, we must admit this and we must admit that we had miscalculations and political military economic. well, you have to admit it. if you don't acknowledge it, then you won't solve anything. and do not talk to our people. only by persuading that they will collapse there now. and this they will collapse, probably, well, it is necessary to understand that this is that there is no easy way to the stars. this is what russia should always understand, and that in russia everything is always not thanks in spite of. yes, this is necessary. don't, don't hide

it from ours. people that and the complexity of the situation, so to speak, that we have problems, and we know these problems in this sense, it seems to me that this is not not not not quite, the right intonation today, because the situation is really extremely it is extremely really it's about our future our country, our motherland, and this is speech. seriously, this is not easy, so to speak, it is clear that this is for those who reflect on the fact that we started this operation. yes, it was inevitable. this already for me has nothing to do with who started or finished there? it was unavoidable. it was visible. and by the way, many people talked about this in another way, that they were not listened to. in our country, they talked about it, that it was coming. it's not for a long time, it's been 30 years. this was already said after the ninety-first year. and so to speak everyone knows perfectly well that this topic was attended by another issue, that we

made mistakes, just not noticing. well, the expansion of the west towards russia began a long time ago and it continued and strictly speaking, just when it turned, when it became narrower, ukraine, when it was already belgorod, then it all exploded, you understand, and there is no doubt that even the minsk agreements that at one time seemed like a success, in fact, were a defeat for russia then, because in fact , if ukraine had complied with these minsk agreements. it would have turned out donbass in fact. i would close the border, even with the armed forces there was something of the donetsk land. everything would be there for several years. they would have slammed it all. so this is clear again. that they went to the conflict, they provoked it, because in fact the simplest and most successful thing for them was to fulfill the minsk agreements, which we

tried to carry out all the time, so to speak, so that it can be seen from this that russia from russia had absolutely no desire , in general, somehow way to activate this conflict, therefore, in this sense, there is no doubt, that this fight was e inevitable, but she really acquired such a one. the word something love the existential nature of such a foreign word. okay, now anyway. what is positive about this? well, when we plunge into historical examples. well, actually, here they recalled the korean vietnam war, in general, the korean war was an even worse situation, because there was a direct clash between soviet and americans and let me remind you that soviet pilots seriously participated in this battle, by the

way, they won, by the way , let me remind you, and their superiority of strategic weapons, that their superiority of strategic weapons. well, yes, no, despite the fact that they had superiority in nuclear weapons there, so to speak, well, you understand, that is, american, despite american superiority, strategic vietnam vietnam also took part in our direct military, they did not take part in the territory of the south vietnam, but the calculation is all missile calculations. basically there were soviet pilots were soviet, who did not fly beyond the parallel, as in korea, but in vietnam they worked, this was also direct. the distance of the americans is, by the way, dim, i don’t really understand that the americans won all all the battles there. here you are probably american historians. by the way, you read vietnamese there is a completely different idea. well, danang, some kind of victory for the americans, you were young. and at that time

i was already enough donat what victory is the environment of the americans, and the hardest thing was the defeat of the americans, yes, they took saigon on anka. they also took saigon vietnam even before no, well, before that. that is, they fought wonderfully in general, but in many respects thanks to us and the fact that we supplied, like heavy equipment there, all this was.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. always wondering where it all

starts? now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check. when we listen to all this rhetoric, it still

reveals that there have been worse times before that though. didn't get it and yet they are visible. indeed, the current situation with our nuclear weapons scares them greatly. uh, to whom to present a monument to kurchatov together with lavrenty palych, it turns out, in fact, how, like who, who created all this at all? well sugar is an avenue. i don't know kurchatov. we have a prospectus in general, we should have a prospectus. but i, uh, moreover, i say that even a small square, comrades, who should be renamed the city of washington into the city of beria well, in general, these people do not just save us. they generally save the world today situations from nuclear.