the purpose and what is the use of what they say, and in what? it's just that i really don't understand, and what 's the negative about these negative statements in two things? yes, there can be no defeat for russia on the battlefield in ukraine, it can only be the fault of the russian leadership. no more. what it does not play any role almost plays a role. who cares? well, it doesn't matter anyway. why is there no condition for the russian army to be defeated in ukraine today? in the world, we can produce furniture in moscow , we are not afraid of americans or europeans, equipment in this drone this module is

purchased exclusively in russia we love russia as our friend today. we pray for peace. if you get the jews out of here, we will present you to the rank, this is the front line. this is where to withdraw from the director of the liquidation. here save what it is remember, we never lost it, even in really bad times, what they do. they pray meet fight. we're leaving now, stop dating. so stand still, they have been praying for

this for 2,000 years. and how will the groom be in hebrew, you do not know? i will now supply nato with all the tanks that they have, and there are

no polish troops, american volodya. they don't have tanks to supply. actually, there are none, but there are american tanks, american tanks are in the united states as many as there are, but a lot have already been transferred to europe. the americans cannot defeat russia with their tanks today, i will not tell you now to take people's time and prove there are weapons that you never want to use. what's the point of having never use a weapon when it's needed when needed. they're just so special.

more carefully, more carefully, a political decision is necessary under what circumstances this weapon will sink to the level. american politicians and american generals who do not understand what they are saying, although despite their epaulettes, sometimes you need to speak with people in a language that they understand, otherwise you need to speak not in losings. well, that is, right away , when it is necessary to speak, i will say. here was the conversation. went to russia in the united states correctly. it was and he said that uh, if there are deliveries of new heavy weapons, this will aggravate the situation. i don't know, nobody knows why and speech on every

sea coaster. well, keep making such statements if there is no action behind them, and then russia responds once and it becomes bad, so this is your hope no, this is knowledge of the history of my country. this will be your hope. well, i'm sorry , it's impossible to understand what will happen, i don't know what happened, because there is always the logic of the political process. you can't be sure that your power is doing what, well it is it was already in history and it was six months ago, but the probability. it was 3 years ago. and what? and we took steps we responded in georgia we ended up in syria now the situation

i want to see where the russian troops will be on february 24th. let's see, i want to see and see on march 24th. and this is april 24 the question of which may 25 is the question of what year, and the question of what year future future should not be measured with a short breath for months or a year or two? no, it's for a long time. so we don't have much time for anything. okay uh, i belong to that part of the european communities that do not want to share anything with russia, uh, which is already against the war, which has been preparing for a long time. and it is clear

that many, uh, well, strategies about this, as if they had been planning for a long time, but it is not clear on behalf of whom our european politics are acting. uh, and i say this because i look at polls and public opinion, and i urge russia to, uh, no, equate a decision possible or a vote of, say, out, uh, governments with opinion. uh, the people and citizens of these countries is a similar situation to that, what happened for many years in ukraine, that is, the people voted. i hope for peace for zelensky and got quite the contrary, the preparation of the war and the game. uh, in some strange game, uh, it often happens, and in dreams, that is, us. nobody

asks european citizens. and if he really wants to fight with russia tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, uh, what is being prepared so that, firstly, uh, everything that looks somehow natural, and secondly, so that there is no possibility. uh, well, how to react somehow, well, to challenge this decision, that is, there are no referendums, there are no democratic decisions, but something of foreign policy, it seems that the american uh, the dictatorship of the junta is so real, well, it was able, but to win and dictate its will in many different countries. and i read. here are the latest polls 54 somewhere in some countries of greece , let's say 60% in austria, but in order to quickly reach an agreement in ukraine with e. the separation

of some parts of some ukrainian uh regions in favor of russia, because many in europe and, probably, in the world understand that the russians just came to where they really live, uh, live. eh, russian in essence population. and that's why i think that in no case should russia close down exactly that part of europe that thinks and thinks differently, i just talked with it people, but with greek portuguese, and the guys who introduce themselves they see that someone is running from here somewhere and they say, well, there is a possibility you come or somehow cooperate with russian companies. there is an opportunity, let's say tourists, but to come, but to russia and this is what young people ask european citizens precisely in these conditions. welcome here, that's why i say this. it is always so simple

when you apply, for example, to some russian embassy somewhere abroad. yes, when you need to draw up something and so on. here, i'm just saying that unfriendly countries are another matter. yes, and another thing, friendly citizens, of which there are very, very many in these countries. that is, you understand, i hear how, uh, the leningrad war is remembered, and do you understand? i also remember my time, when well, in my time. i mean, when we studied these times, and we were really proud. uh, young greek citizens for that in the purchase of greece, people went on strike , they joined greece yes, in order to immobilize a and fight on the eastern front, that is, the germans tried to organize such a mobilization and in greece we could not, we are still proud that there are no greeks.

i hope that e is among those who fought, but against the soviet e, soldiers e on different fronts. we arranged our em, which means our partisanship, our detachments. i'm sure that if things come to some kind of, uh, world war, yes, and where on the one hand will russia i think that from the other side, but there will not be such a real unity against russia. i really hope that after all these heated disputes are hot proposals before the world, i will say, we will see. by the way, the american leadership listened to us now. the white house considers dangerous the rhetoric from the russian side of the aryan nuclear conflict is called to reduce on not put on. and according to our doctrine, by the way, there were already circumstances that made it possible to launch a nuclear strike, because in our doctrine there is,

for example, such a wording, threats and attack on our strategic reaction forces. that is, therefore, when the ukrainians attacked our strategists. this already gives us reason to hammer. and not the fact that only ukrainians, because we understand that it is absolutely true. here is ukraine to deal with nuclear weapons. no, you don't need your territory. we have. if you need to spoil anyone, yes, that is, well, very briefly confirmation that not everything is ideal in the work of our state apparatus, including government ones, came from your lips. you said why with this i was blown up by these relationship? and why it supplies fuel and lubricants here, it's just that, but the main thing i want to say to dmitry evgenievich in your words is that it is better to study psychiatry from history textbooks, both of them are suitable. well, history textbooks, they have different ones, or they don't read them. i mean,

who claims that russia will be judged by someone by its leaders. some tribunals were the two great invasions of napoleonic russia and the guitar. who was judged after the end of this relationship. alexander i stalin or napoleon and exiled to st. helena and well, hitler was not tried because that's all this is huh. so, the result is something and history prescribed not in their favor, the tribunal will not be over the russian leaders. now advertising. more precisely, we will continue with the new composition.

i have one question. why are ukrainian politicians here? so badly brought up. here they always stink, they can't behave anywhere. at a tennis match, they start yelling something. well, at least there should be elementary decency, but at the same time you understand me, you said, the war is painful for us. well, go to war, pinned down with a flag. also came in large numbers crazy house at the exit on all panel discussion of the economic forum, where there is no economy ukrainians, immediately starts

to scream. well, have you killed a few of your own? what do you want ice cream? give us an air defense system. we'll destroy some more entrances and kill people. it turned out to be especially contagious mania to talk about the victory over russia, out of habit, zelensky took over the role of the main insane clown; now he refuses peace negotiations not because he himself signed the corresponding law, but because he does not believe in the existence of putin but all this is there said. do you all understand now the scheme and what to talk about? i'm not sure that the president of russia, who sometimes tv people will understand on a chromac, appears somewhere. i don’t quite understand what it is, i don’t fully understand life and whether it makes a decision or someone there

makes a decision, what kind of circle of people makes a decision. now i don't have that information. i do not quite understand how you can promise a european leader, and the next day start a full-scale invasion of the state. i just don't quite understand who we have case, so when we talk about peace talks, i don't understand with whom. well, really idiot. well, i mean, that's what hard drugs do to a person. well, really, well, just a man, idiot. and after that, well, this cretin forgot what he published. a decree forbidding oneself to negotiate is not enough. i like it that this cretin talks about chromakey, after the whole world has circled where he records on chromakey, that is, well, that is, it is not clear who zelensky is, this narcotic moron with his dealer johnson. by the way, at the same time, he never

passed, not a single test, as i understand it, and when they had a discussion with poroshenko, he, like , passed the test in the laboratory of his friend on monday, so well, well, well, dmitry sergeevich pukov replied. it is clear that both russia and putin are both for the ukraine of today 's ukraine and for zelensky this is a big problem , and it is clear that purely psychologically, mr. zelensky would prefer that there was no russia, no putin, but the sooner he realizes, the sooner. well, characterize realizes and gives report that russia and putin are and will be, and that sooner or later you will still have to abandon the russian one, the better for a side like ukraine in any case. in the earlier mode of the ukrainian region, the willingness to take into account the requirements of russia that will be achieved one way or another, the faster everything will end. and the sooner the people

of ukraine will begin to recover after the tragedy here, which the kiev regimes staged. zelensky, what did he turn out to be? no talent? boring repetitive, well, here's some crumpled steam at the same time, well, there's more the concept of karma, well, here is someone from the monastery, who crashed and, moreover, notice that he said something about the death of his friend accomplice. the lives of children who were absolutely subjected to him do not care at all about this and all the western press, as vladimir vladimirovich very accurately wrote today, analyzing the western press, in fact, do not care about the ugly photographs of a strange woman who seems to be zelensky's wife who is somehow holding it back like- then everything is so disgusting, to make it clear, this

monastic man said a lot of things. so don't randomly arises such a question about karma. four months of russian attack, we are talking from the underground bunker now the sirens are working, when and how can this end? i think it should be the death of putin by our forces or by the forces of the russian people. do you think putin's death will be soon? i hope? now this person is gone. now he is gone, but something else is interesting there. it is interesting that budanov gave an interview here and talked about how he was killed by mistake. killed a man of extrajudicial

reprisals and western. the media is not even on this subject got confused. nobody even asked that question. it's a hell of an official delegation for any citizen, therefore, why be surprised this is a type of democratic country, you hear, you stupid hats are pseudo journalists. well , the liquidation of cyril by agents of the hut was killed by a shot in the back of the head. and just about that explains it. latvichki, and budanov said this, in my opinion, british. there was no unified coordination between the layered structure; on the one hand, there were certain claims against it; on the other hand , these claims did not have time to be settled in a dialogue format. recognize

in the fact that he joyfully explains to the latvian nazi why they banged and these latvian journalists are these nazi cattle. doesn't even ask a question. that is, they do not even have a wall street journal, they do not know the questions. this is generally normal democratic country. biden, did not start an elbow, the germans did not initiate criminal cases that they killed a terrorist on the street. remember they were there, how they all radiated in the center of kiev without trial or investigation, the ukrainian special services admitted no one was punished and everyone in the family says, well, what, well, you know, well, you swim to say that like fuck yourself yes , of course, this pseudo-democracy should be wiped off the face of the earth. he is very curious about where you are going. for russia, this is an existential

conflict, they cannot afford to lose. nato claims that this is an existential conflict, but the fact of the matter is that nato can survive if russia wins the war with ukraine because nato has lived without ukraine throughout its history to take over ukraine not necessarily, but nato pretends that russia's victory in ukraine is nato's defeat, but what's next? is going to come to terms with this defeat. nato is going to escalate the situation, to avoid defeat. nato seems to be escalating right now. what is the purpose of just prolonging the conflict to satisfy lloyd austin's ambitions to hurt russia or actually let ukraine defeat ukrainian victory means ukraine according to ukraine's own definition of victory will take back donbas and your zaporozhye kherson which means they are going to fight against mother russia russia, however, swallowed up these peoples, according to article, 64, according to zelensky's statements, he will also require. fight, crimea yes, that's

what i'm talking about no doubt it's not conceivable when nato sets out to supply weapons to ukraine when ukraine says it needs these weapons to do the unimaginable and that means at least for paper the potential for thermonuclear war, but russia explicitly stated. we are not going to drop nuclear weapons on ukraine if we decide to drop them we will drop them on london berlin paris washington around colombia at the end of the day the world will see that russia is not playing a limited nuclear war. russia does not play these games. this is purely a construct in the western mind that can somehow limit nuclear conflict. russia has made it clear that we will not be the first to use nuclear weapons. vladimir putin said they would be second. and that means as soon as you shoot at us. we don't wait, when they hit, we let you all in. what we have and we will all die, but we will

go to heaven, as martyrs you will go to hell like idiots who started a nuclear conflict. vladimir vladimirovich yes, i'll start with this really scandalous investigation. a big wall street journal article about, uh, how kireev died , a member of the negotiating group of the gomel group, as they called it then u from ukraine emphasized a participant in banking expert u, was it clear to everyone who shot? he is, in fact, his. mm, they were executed on the street of kiev in the very center on the doorstep, the sbu was thrown just like that on the street without any problems there. and here i am reading this research. this is how, in my opinion, it is called a russian spy or a hero of ukraine yes and so, uh, hmm, having interviewed budanov, he convinces them there that this man worked for the main intelligence department, he protects his people well. well, yes, here and there, it means that he

says there that he was fulfilling the tasks of ukraine, he was performing a very difficult task, in general, the heroes of ukraine and, uh, regret, this is coming. these are articles that, you understand, they mistook a russian spy for an agent of russia and executed them on the street, that is, you understand, even the very formulation of the question of the newspaper is not in the sense that look in ukraine, you can simply declare anyone to be russian spies shoot on on the street in the back of the head and calmly, it means to live with it and calmly avoid any responsibility to carry out extrajudicial reprisals. and, that is, it didn’t bother them at all if he were an agent of russia, so you can think of jordan’s wall street and podlyak’s comment. e. sorry not the last person. you are the hierarchy of ukrainian power. yes, the latvian media in fact. this confirms. well, yes, he certainly was not an agent of russia, they just didn’t agree on the agreement, there were special services among themselves. well, they

were executed by mistake. yes, that is, no problem to them latvian mixed none, where all pravozaschi. kirby in response to this article wall street published a second. this is just kireev. he already lit up on this one at these negotiations. they were still walking, and he was already executed, and so we became aware of the whole story. can you imagine how many people like this in ukraine deputies politicians. maybe many do not know that you are without a personal order. yes, you know, in the first days of the war, they could do anything faster then, but i 'm sure not. well, i'm sure that the law gives greenery. i want to remind you that zelensky a few days later they asked about kireev's death and he said that i don't care about the fate of the traitor. that is, he, in fact, right then called the traitors and justified this execution , this confirms that he gave the go-ahead, but,

perhaps, i don’t argue, they brought it up that we have traitors to eliminate completely, it’s possible that it was another matter that then in the early days these military men. the action of the special operation they did anything, especially these sbu defense terras they executed and buried there. how many more such uh, corpses have been found, it’s even scary to imagine, but you see, in the west, quite normal back. this is welcomed in the west, they believe that this is the struggle for democracy. yes, yes, yes, you mean democrats. these are the values ​​of the western fuss of people without trial and investigation, and in the center of kiev, this is democracy opposite st. sophia of kiev, by the way, to the question of where it all is located.

i've noticed my

husband's episodes of our podcasts subscribe

and of course zelensky's appearance in davos today at this breakfast. listen, the heretic does not believe the existence of putin, as far as the substance of some kind really should penetrate, apparently not yet overslept. in the morning he explains that he will not know with whom to negotiate, because putin is on chroma key. remember yesterday putin yes piskarevskoe cemetery.