well, the appearance, of course, of zelensky today in davos at this breakfast. listen, the heretic does not believe in the existence of putin before. how much really must, uh, some kind of substance penetrate. looks like he hasn't slept since morning. well, that is, he sits here and explains that he will not know with whom to negotiate, because putin is on chroma key. you will remember yesterday's day putin yes piskarevskoe cemetery with veterans. they are probably

some kind of actors there too. yes, but the obukhov plant, there and so on. there are a lot of public meetings events. it's all chromaque, beauty. the tenant sits somewhere in some bunker in some office and broadcasts until 8 about putin who does not exist. well, it really needs to be completely asleep. uh, and those people who listened to it, they couldn't say, they say, the man is carrying something. well, i saw this audience there, in principle, a small audience. well, excuse me there, here lyosha goncharenko was sitting, he could say, this is an idiot. yes, he was in the hospital. he, in my opinion , called zelensky that because he often cannot do that, then i don’t remember. yes it was the moment when he was lying, poroshenko was already an asshole. yes, there were different then zelensky , no one knew that, well, as a politician, anyway , and that’s when the same goncharenko

or poroshenko could be hired to kill one of their competitors, but it certainly did not get wet. what am i doing or you said about the appearance of elena zelenskaya on the front pages today. uh, western newspapers. i've been really surprised by several british newspapers at once. comes out on the front page. with this story about the tragedy in brovary well she really deserves it. the children suffered, the dead are terrible shots. and there were all western journalists in brovary . that is, they have exclusive footage. here are these crying women who are there, whose kids have suffered and so on on the front page, an illustration of this tragedy, a crying olena, zelenskaya between shopping widows, trying to pick out for themselves. well, yes, that is. well, here, here’s the most adequate one - this is the perception of this whole tragedy, if he endures lena zelenskaya , and what about zelensky’s audience it’s me started the hound there boris johnson was. well, what do you

think you can say? he came out saying, we must quickly urgently. give ukraine a bunch of weapons, and he says, you won’t pay attention to putin. he use nuclear weapons. and if it does, then we must warn that nato will launch a nuclear strike on russia, that's the question. who ends up threatening who? that is, he threatens us turns out, if he is using. how boris johnson finds out about this boris johnson thinks we're going to hit ukraine. a that's when nato hit. well, boris johnson understands that if we fuck, then now i stepanovich thinks that at the moment where we are content, judging by these statements. he, well, what they say, that’s why his career or was there even among zeleninsky’s audience, the mark of the prime minister of the netherlands here in general struck me, you know, he expressed concern that with or without a cupcake or without a cupcake, the zelenins there, against the background of zelensky, they were all

sober . why am i speaking like that. says it's a concern that not all countries joined the anti-russian coalition and says that africa, i persuade the african leaders and explain that russia's war with ukraine is, uh, russia is trying to revive colonialism, this is ridiculous. and you countries have just gone through decolonization. you must support me. and i think this is the prime minister of the netherlands, and the africans, where they had colonies there, they grieve there, but tell about the fact that you understand that they just got rid of the dutch from us. yes, he would still remember, and who helped the africans, uh, overcome some butterflies, that is, the real all of idiocy was beaten by christ's riml of a rationalist granddaughter of the editor-in-chief of krakow news collaborations of a low nazi newspaper, and

soft or who is he anchor which, by the way, i found in the archives. well, in the sense that they recently declassified it from a document, and there was a document that ukrainian prisoners of war of ukrainian, uh, nationality. yes, i was forced to read. uh, krakow news in order to convince them to join some nazi units there, where he was the editor-in -chief. her grandfather and here she is today suddenly speaks and begins to quote ivan franko that everyone can become bogdan if the time, so you need to come, and bogdanova explains khmelnitsky, yes, that is, peres has gathered . that is, do you really want to get up and sign the pereyaslav rada to swear allegiance to the moscow state, or thought maybe she meant bogdan stashensky, the murderer of stepan bandera, you know, i’ll start eating from davos,

slowly until sunrise, turns into a dead place turned into you know such a wild one, which gogol described very well in his work of a farm, near dikanka, where there are turtlenecks of fortune-telling witches, and all the devils gather, and so on and real. well, some kind of exchange was not to carry on issues related to the language of pagan security, but there people are starving in africa. and there are issues related to finances, so to speak, the state. in the world, and in arms. let's give weapons. that's who is more, but the auction of generosity is no longer the same as it used to be, why is it not there? well , for example, uh, the same germans, yes, in a leopard they say, let abram surrender. and then we will give leopards, and the poles, of course, we will give, but how much i understand that we will not just give, but we don’t care what the germans say according to

european rules, we need to get permission for leopards. and if you have some other weapon, they have crabs there, they give the question is that in the same germany more than half of the voters is their sociology against further singling out. uh, weapons to ukraine. many of them understand that any weapon and the more deaths. it's not up to the world it, on the contrary, raises the bar of conflict and what we always talk about can really happen, that god forbid there will be a nuclear war. it's the scariest thing out there. there will be no such thing, but i’ll start this tactical with a tactical finish. god what eh? well, the prime minister of poland confirmed that they have to persuade and so on they drink champagne, dear . i think they are considering the option. uh, holding a referendum is already a referendum in five regions in the event that there will be

it is clear that he is losing all of ukraine and so on, but zelensky will not care. he'll get out, they don't give a damn about everything, what's going on. here in ukraine there was such a wave that began to talk about the fact that there is an obvious dictatorship in russia. this was due to the fact that putin signed the order. about e withdrawal from the eu agreement, i thought i'll take the secret. look, i saw their list, and then i think what grounds the list has, yes, and there already. you see, and among them there is the european convention on human rights. well so good sounds and understandable and what does this mean, and this means that the european court of human rights, referring to this convention, obliged all states that signed this convention to ensure the legal order of same-sex marriages, so that this is regulated in the national legislation and the mechanisms for protecting these families, it is clear that russia, which focuses primarily on the national interest in the constitution, where

it is written that this is a union of a man and a woman , they say, why do we need such a convention? but she , russia, did not withdraw from the universal convention human rights conventions. this is the basic document, because the european one was adopted later, because it generally corresponds to what is written in the constitution, so ukrainians should know about this zelensky. we must remind you signed there going and the convention has already become on the flight of what's coming soon. there will be a law on one full marriage, and this whole one, and finally, he will make a fireplace. well, yes, and i'll tell you. you are already senior comrades. uh, so to speak, uh, they suggest biden signed this law. and where are you going? let's sign further, of ​​course, arrestovich. this is a phenomenon. here, i'll tell you, to be honest, when they saw the arrest officer himself, removing him for telling the truth. that's just telling the truth. remember, he says lie to yourself and

others. and then he told the truth about these missiles, they removed it. and then i saw this video. well, there he used obscene things. she has a good expression, but he voted there for a person with a complex complex, which she in zelensky, and this is exactly what i called in voters, i’ll take it in parallel. eh, your motherfucker and called these electors badly. that's what they told them. e how he treats them a cat he was at the same time. the one who was chosen is clear, as they say. he was at work with him, but the question is that this is not only such a petty revenge, there is something going on inside. you understand that they can bang and throw the body to but i was not only lucy's petty ukrainian revenge and drag, because it's true, he was still considered not the first in the rating. even below tinned it also saw the sociology that he spoke, but the question goes in another question is about the fact that

something is happening inside, the conversation is about the resignation of the timashevites. male im. so to speak , it is also located. today, already under e americans in terms of persecution for stealing 7 million dollars, this award of 7 million dollars to the ukrainian people has long been. as they say, he is waiting for this, but the question is precisely this , that the lawlessness that exists in ukraine is not only unconstitutional, you know, anyone can be killed, moreover. most surprisingly not understanding why uh there are claims against this citizen, and we will give you a hundred times the example of oles buzina, who did nothing at all, only expressed his point of view. and quite tolerant, but decisively, but called a spade a spade. until today . everyone knows who killed and there is no verdict, and therefore you are right, zelensky, who acts, as it were, as a guarantor, but is a person who blesses, because such information for a normal president is

immediately ordered to investigate protocol. like this? so what? just such a fate zelensky, you decide on zelensky, you didn’t decide anything at all, it works again. yes , of course, he said that zelensky's reactivity , to put it mildly, to put it mildly, it is called opinion, it is not legitimate everything that is already clear after the coup, there is nothing to the constitution or power, there is just to walk the field in which ukraine is dying . you know, when i read the statement of ukrainian politicians, they start with the president and end with the mayor, the city of kiev, including the minister of defense, and so on , the minister of foreign affairs. i got question in general, the adequacy of these people , you know, adequacy, that's what it is. you can think whatever you want about anyone. yes, but somehow keep your thoughts

to yourself and even more so if they are so dubious, yes, but if you dump it all out in public, then you automatically become an idiot, and moreover, they also made idiots those people who were present at this so called respected forum. yes , because none of them stood up and asked a question. guys, you are absolutely perfect. what are you carrying? i just want whoever it is i would stand up and ask, forgive me, of course, vladimir vasya can you tell me, who did you look into the eyes of in paris in 1919? who was there anyway? well, you kind of met there. yes, the hands were stinging and talking about something. well, yes, well, it turns out, this is also, as it were, well, generally surprising. i'll be honest, i've listened a lot, bloggers are allowed to talk such nonsense there, well , what about the president or officials, but it seems to me that it is absolutely not permissible. well, nothing new. actually for me there was no criticism. to

europeans, she sounded. well, if so briefly, zelensky said that tyranny is overtaking democracy, we are talking about the fact that, well, the united west does not supply enough weapons to them. yes, in order for zelensky to continue, by the way, he indicated that the counter -offensive of ukraine was not completed, it turns out that winter just continues, it slowed down, but it would speed up if you gave us more weapons, more recognized that solidarity at least lost. no absolutely not, and do not and do not recognize. and god, there is information there is information that he do not mention the zaluzhny team and in general in the information field. uh, artyomovsk or bakhmut? yes, because we are on the edge. eh, ramstein, they also need to solve all these issues. they are well aware that if the west is convinced that they have no zelensky and his team, there is

no chance to demonstrate success on the battlefield, then, of course, it will be interesting to provide them with weapons. of course, he's worried for nothing. in any case, we will give, they will give. i just wanted to say this you know right after the ad. you will bring you to the rank. this is the front line. here and bring out the director of the liquidation saved, what it is it was never lost, even in really bad times.

we have grenades, he wants to throw for his older brother from all kovrov and the task is to survive and reach and there is no choice , there is a righteous person according to chance. soon, for me , the question is not worth giving or not giving weapons, of course, they will give rammstein if it is scheduled for tomorrow, all questions related to the provision of ukraine with weapons. they already agreed resolved part already accurately delivered. well, in principle, the scheme is such information that supposedly one bradley has already been burned. yes, but still it must be admitted that it is nevertheless

necessary to admit that in relation to the ukraine conflict, the opposition of the british and americans. also very different, because today i was surprised, you know. it’s just that today i accidentally turned on petro poroshenko’s channel there and was surprised when one of the experts asked him a question. so wait guys. are you sure that in general the americans want to defeat the russians. well, are you sure about that? i have, for example, such confidence. no, maybe they are playing us somewhere. well , actually, it's just journalists. yes, she is there at the highest level, they believed that all the statements of the americans sincerely, they will support them, so to speak, to the end and allocate all the necessary weapons and a sufficient amount of resources. well, the last thing i would like to say here, uh, was the

name of the arrestovich. here i remember a few episodes ago. he talked about not underestimating these people. i'm listening to him statement. he is already directly trying to protect the russian people in ukraine, he says, i will not let them turn. uh, uh, i will not let you turn all russians into clans. yes, that is, what i'm leading to. i 'm leading to the fact that this is an absolutely well-thought-out, absolutely well-thought-out position of the ukrainian authorities that has distanced itself from the authorities in creating a new political project. you know who will have to evaluate it, those russian people who live on the territory of ukraine will have to evaluate it, you know for what for the courage for the opportunity to speak out. although this opportunity has been given, the ukrainian authorities personally to a person, and this person will be very, very, uh, guarded by the ukrainian authorities, because a certain political task will be set before him. as for the political field, there is no political field and no alternative. there

is no alternative. they create for themselves absolutely controlled absolutely controlled and on the financial corruption resources that they have accumulated in such an amount that i don’t even remember the periods during the entire independence of ukraine when someone, let’s say, made money on these corruption schemes, especially, uh, period uh war eugene well, i will try to focus on the torrent report at the end of the year twenty-second i have an interesting name for the role of information in the us concept of strategic rivalry. this truth continues the words of spiridon pavlach regarding the fact that a deep restructuring is currently underway in the informational political diplomatic agenda. i can see what you are saying, i fixed myself with such a phrase that some kind of rotation is taking place. yes, but this rotation is not political in nature. he went there one politician, the second, and again, i repeat, but i am absolutely convinced of this

regarding the fact that there is no talk about the fact that these are some kind of political ones. for now, let's talk about political projects. it's premature. so far meaningless. well, in general, it is not necessary, because this rotation, most likely, is underway. uh, there are no official players. and the fact that this rotation will increase. i believe that yes, we will see more than one change. and this is how i allow myself to make a certain forecast regarding. eh, here's a near-term perspective. i i see the following, that there is no peace party in ukraine. no, there won't be any talk about it. this is an attempt by that part of the people who talk about possible agreements. these are the people who say this, perhaps their talks. that is, these are people who are also quite a lot of capitals, but nevertheless, the logic of political life is such that this is also what i paid attention to. these are official documents. it just makes sense. here's another phrase for me to fix it to systematize all the knowledge that exists today in these areas. identify the problem and

agree in the expert not to be satisfied, but to eliminate expert disagreements, that is, there is a certain reformatting in the west, well, in an analytical sauce regarding how to behave with russia, how to behave in ukraine what kind of people will this be more? to greet. which people will respond more, to those requirements and requests, the issue with the weapons of this issue is absolutely right, the military component is acting as a matter of negotiations - this is most likely a certain now it’s a denial maneuver, because there is still a large group of people, you and i talked about this, who see that there is still some. uh, some kind of negotiation opportunity conditions, but when meetings like this happen, a doesn't. i'm telling you, i'll finish. it’s just that there are people who talk about it, but when such events happen, how they deliver like rammstein that is, now all the statements of the president of ukraine and responsible political e military e, officials, we can say so there can be no talk of negotiations, that is a variation of the conditions that are

put forward by ultimatums to russia and says that there are opportunities and resources and summarizing what has been said. i want to say the following, that now there will obviously be a new search for new ones. uh, let's say approaches for the information campaign regarding the west. i believe that there are all uh in the united states and britain that are moderators. i didn't understand. yeah. that is, there will be a new approach. coverage coverage of the situation e in ukraine e consolidation of further concentration approach of the west i think that here will. well, i think that there will be an attempt to eliminate differences here, because we often say there are differences in the west that there are people who are more loyal to politicians there , then, in my opinion, at least one. well, i think it's, uh, turkey is hungary , these are the people who are involved in this story, because serbia is in their own world. i agree, that is, for the sake of three, try to

jump over everything. there is also what you said and african countries. there are former countries. well, the soviet-s-, uh, the highest republic of the soviet union where, in my opinion, work on, say, a more specific, clearer position regarding the processes that are taking place in russian-ukrainian relations will be activated. if it's clear , here's a summary. here. eh, my thought is one more circumstance. oh, which i wanted to say. here you gave a report of cattle ritter regarding the existential war. that is, i believe that here it will be and uh, the united states will have a tougher approach. and that's just it in the render document. she uh, said they would save. here this is the vein, well, one of the key thoughts, what is to maintain its position of global dominance? i mean it's marked position marked target and underneath that would be basically, er, definite. what's new in that? i think what's new is that there is no way for

any conversations and negotiations. well, how to say, a few years and do not try to talk. well, you know, as an option after we set the task. they explained that they did not want to talk to us, and therefore their own. but i agree. but there is one moment when we often mention kissinger, when we often say 99 years old, it doesn't matter, but she represents anyone, even herself, he has already changed his point of view several times over the past few months. we don't even know if he writes this name exactly changed 99 years. well, what are we going to assume now that the casenger is behind him, what is only here? i believe that today, today, what about what the macron said, but a number of politicians who, well, the first template there or the second, if how can you say that everything there were some discussions, so there were occasions. i think it will today. deviating completely from the agenda the topic and possibly the negotiations on the task of

demonstrating a consolidated position from the west although i believe that this movement will be so. well, this consolidated position began when the macron and merkel tried to make a meeting with russia in the summer and they were told no. well, that's right, that is, from now on. just as i am surprised by people who, in all seriousness, believe that the world wants to negotiate something with us, there is these are the 50 nazi countries. yes, we do not want to negotiate with them. we have china, we have india, we have quite 75% of humanity, as the g6 said today, in good relations with russia, but there are 50 nazi states. why do i single them out so much, but they did not vote for the resolution condemning nazism, they set the task in a certain way, as our leadership said yesterday. they follow the path of hitler, they want to end up solving the russian question. we have people here for some reason with a number of experts.

there is a feeling that someone will restore to negotiate some parties of the world was surprised when they didn’t tell me very much, dulich would rather bay in all the bells are drained. for some reason, everyone did not believe me, it seems that there will be some kind of agreement, there will be no agreement and no one takes prisoners. they are not going to take us prisoner, they want to destroy us. and everything that 's going on right now. and by the way, rend wrote for many years how we will be destroyed, because friedman chicago's idiots for trying to formulate the position of an existential threat to the united states is an alliance between russia and germany so he did his best to keep his honesty once again using the old philosophical idea. yes, yes from the sea, to the sea to create intimacy. actually this task. they decided absolutely right, they decide it too, because they didn't take it into account. what is russia they

did not understand our people. here, they honestly grinded almost all the weapons that were left by the soviets, and the naked poles say, but we are not from the warehouses of the current one. well , that means they are ready for raids on the territory, so there will be. there is nothing to defend to this everything goes everything goes to what is local the conflict escalates into a full-scale european war with a plan to become a world war. well , if we are to be serious, well , actually, i wanted to indicate that a certain reformatting is now underway. here is a reformatting, here is a look at the events that are taking place and they can finish off and they naively think that we will not answer them, so i really brought you the key idea. they will maintain their political military global dominance. they declared it when they did not refuse it. they never get away with it

refused, and we understand well, therefore we pay such attention to the vc, therefore we carefully look at what is happening on the front line of all our democratic principles. they all talk about new territories. they talk about the crimea but they are not interested in the opinion of the people living there, the issue is not being discussed. for the fourteenth year, the germans spent sociology in the crimea on the referendum.

we are used to watching videos, stop working , install, open, watch russian channels, and all series of movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries movies for free without registration, watch in the application or on the site.