we were embarrassed in this situation, that is, the reaction, maybe, whether it will be. hmm, i don’t know if it does n’t, if it doesn’t, i’m afraid that these persecutions will go on, but in fact, his holiness the patriarch spoke about this, not at the end of december at the diocesan meeting in moscow what is happening now in ukraine from the ecclesiastical point of view. this is the work of the devil. he u literally he just said so holy, that he lost, that this is the work of those who allowed the devil's cancer in their hearts, and this is not a figure of speech. it's really a fight uh father of lies father of hatred against uh, the church of christ therefore power, apparently, in as far as uh, will be able to continue to act, so how to act. now you were talking about those who netted the patriarchy of her sermons on the holidays of epiphany , he called for quotes to pray to the lord that he would come to the senses of the madmen who want to destroy

russia, this will mean the end of the world that is, the church, uh, still insists that they want to destroy russia, you know, on in fact, they talk about the destruction of russia about western politics. they talk about the need already divide. uh, somehow decolonize in their expression. that is, we did not come up with this at all, not uh, not representatives. they are not the most holy patriarch, not representatives of the russian statehood - this is what they are talking about, but in the west about what victory over russia entails, among other things. uh, well, the scenario of dismemberment is favorable for them, that is, its destruction in fact, do we need the lord? that is the question? well, they say there, you never know what, they say. yes, who does not jump, that muscovite, you can say everything that anything in your own telegram channel. let me remind you of some ergo sums for those who want to subscribe to you. you have a recent and such a post

about the negative emotional buildup of the rejection of prudence, i will quote another trouble, or rather a risk - this is the buildup of negative emotions associated with the rejection of prudence, envy, hatred. debauchery, despondency of godlessness, panic fear weaken any person. any society opens the way to its destruction. why should we duplicate this idea about the need for destruction or dismemberment there russia, if we are united, we are not afraid of this, and we are strong as an elephant. well, we can just ignore this pug or step on it there. why patriarch? eh, being a church person? yes, not secular, not a politician. it comes back to this idea again and again that somewhere out there they want to destroy russia. well, you know, first of all, after all, we are not in a situation, after all, they are against us, but a very powerful, er, coalition. uh, the world, so here really it is for us the patriarch, he says

to pray to the lord so that he understands the madmen, who want to destroy russia, this will mean the end of the world, the patriarch makes it clear that russia is a word. why wait the patriarch said what he said, let's not interpret his words. and once again, uh, still against us. eh, he fights very hard . yes, but in huge countries, that is, in fact, the situation is certainly not simple. well , actually, we see this if it were a simple, military operation, would have ended already, well, almost immediately, so the situation, of course, is not simple, but people still need to understand what is happening and why in the end ends? why does e military warrior need to be understood? why they fight for what they howl to the people who donate here, and even means , uh, some kind of their well-being in the rear, too, must be understood. what happens with all the clauses and sentences that uh, of course, uh, the church is separated from the state, uh? well,

let's say that the gospel is not a formal legal law, but for our country, that is, we are in no way in some kind of hmm muslim country, where sharia sometimes replaces the law in our country in a different way, nevertheless , and russia is one of such pillars, which for the time being can still save and protect, and hmm defend. actually, as it was in the un, from which we began to defend christian ideals in this world, and from our point of view, from the point of view of christians, if the antichrist ever comes and anti-christianity triumphs, then the world will end its existence. therefore, for now, russia is one of those pillars that keeps the world from final destruction. russia too. maybe, unfortunately, go down a negative path, so we

you have to be very careful not to be proud. that's what i said there to admire yourself. oh, what good fellows we are, what, but for now, hmm , we are doing something for christianity, but always with great apprehension with great humility to accept that for now we can still do something, or we may or may not do something, we can take a negative path and participate in this anti-christian bacchanalia tribunal the other day 478 votes in favor and 19 against voted for putin's tribunal comment. well, this is probably more secular news, after all. that is, as a citizen of russia, i am outraged by this. and if in general, so to speak, to look at the question more globally. i think that and those people in europe are they in the majority or not? not sure if they are in the majority. and if we take the peoples, all the people

of europe but, if we take the ruler about hmm uh, the authorities, those in power in europe, then they make up the majority, as we see, i think that they would like to judge not but the head of our russian state they would like to judge russia itself yes, we have consistently seen for many years. actually, hmm, yes, for many centuries, in fact, how europe opposes russia interferes with it. uh, for different reasons at different times back in the day. maybe it was more economic or reasons or political now. again, and my conviction is that e russia is at the opposite pole from those ideals of anti-value from our point of view, which form the basis of the world that is now being created in europe, so russia is already such, if you like, but metaphysical

adversary for europe and therefore want to judge not vladimir vladimirovich putin, well, him , too, of course, but they don’t really want it from him , but they want to judge the whole of russia in a textbook on literary reading for the second grade, well, photos of this textbook appeared on the internet explaining the turn to students. who is nazi hitler, what is lend-liss to get acquainted with proverbs about the war tells how children lived during the great patriotic war. i remember the years of my studies at mgimo m. first language. i had german, which meant nine there. nine couples it was an hour and a half a week. seriously, this is such a linguistic education and all the textbooks printed on a typewriter. they were here exclusively about the great patriotic war, about the cold war, the division of germany into the western

eastern e, the wall, and everything and everything that follows. therefore, when i first arrived in germany, i did not know how to explain to the hotel that no room is needed or order a beer in a restaurant, but i knew such things as the ministry of foreign affairs and traffic vile traitors. this is approximately the reaction of the germans laughter, because that's what is for us. eh, in the noughties it was even in the educational system of the university, something close to them was something already very distant from a past life. uh, do you think that in general the second grade students need to know what a land is, what is a kerosene stove? wait catherine laughed. it ’s not because what you are talking about that i laughed far from me, because when teaching a language you need to learn the spoken language, and not what is not usable, but in well, in communicating with people. as for what students learn and

such things? i'm in germany now, probably, maybe, well, anyway, uh hmm, so teaching your german language training in m-m in this terminology is a separate issue, as for the textbook for the second second grade. yes, you said, uh, the study of the history of the great patriotic war, and why not, for me, for example, has always been the most interesting since childhood. i think it's useful to know the first patriotic war, for example, the war of 1812. and well, i sort of studied in france at school, yes, where i was born and raised, but it was not taught there, like this, but i studied it myself, and it was interesting. this is important to know. and how it is, says the case. e, long gone years traditions of antiquity deep. and all this is certain. even know. you need to know your past, this does not mean that

you need to be in it, but to drown that it is the main thing in the life of our fatherland, the heads of people's lives, the main thing is hmm striving forward. well , to keep moving forward. we rely on something. what to run, yes or somehow, in e running competitions, athletes, when here they, uh, start running. they put their foot on some kind of deck. here but if they had not become much more difficult to start, so that also for us, to develop uh, to develop ourselves, to develop our country. and in order to develop, you need to know the direction to understand what happened before. otherwise. well, how to argue very, very much with the fact that we need to know our past. and we have great musicians. we have, uh, writers. there is mendeleev. we have polar explorers. we have discovered antarctica but i assure you more than sure if these people will be served,

let's say for state grants with some projects, and with them they will compete, or let's say a documentary film about the great patriotic war will lead the latter. why exactly the idea of ​​war and that war we are russia we are holy war, we are defending ourselves against us all and we are defending ourselves. why, for decades, this military theme has been leading when we talk about patriotism. why don't i really know? so you mentioned my telegram channel, uh, in telegram, and i communicate quite widely, a wide range of authors of different telegram channels is very. uh, they are very patriotic , uh, and reasoning u are smart, but who , too, who say that well, is by no means, and this topic is the topic of the great patriotic war. it is certainly important, but

it is not the only one. they develop many different other subjects in advance. a hmm i can’t be responsible for a thoughts or decisions or what to think, those people who award this or that, grants but really, what can i say about what, that you need to look at our history, of course, complex, and by no means only e, the great patriotic war is our property. this is also our property, but most importantly, what we need to rely on is the creation of our country, this is ideals, maybe because the great patriotic war, about which the sense of smell, oh, which many still remember, yes, well, not directly from the participants, and the participants themselves are leaving us more and more for completely natural reasons. but, well, someone's parents still fought grandfather grandmother, that is, the memory is still fresh and in great great patriotic war. and i saw many qualities that are important to us.

yes, and friendship. courage, uh, including patriotism, and love for the fatherland, and all this is not protection from something. and what was positive in people. it's really bright maybe, and it's a good positive example, the way people treated each other. no, of course, there was a lot of bad things, so we also understand, and there are a lot of bad people, including among, and among there. our compatriots then yes were there and collaborators were betrayals, but there were obviously a lot of good stuff. ah, which what is a really good example is another matter, what exactly, as it seems, it is precisely on this that we must first of all insist on what ideals we would like these ideals to be at the heart of our country. they manifested themselves not only in the great patriotic war. well, and now, i

mentioned the first patriotic war until 1812 and not only the soldiers, they showed themselves and in general it is important to talk about what is important to talk about? ah, well, really positive things. eh, i once formulated what i think for myself fundamentals, so to speak, but the russian idea, if you like, this is faith in god with everything that is combined. yes, if i don’t say now, but christian or understanding of the faith of god or not christian, although they certainly believe that in the history of our country. and our people, though uh different uh different national and different religious people, and well, of course, orthodoxy is the basis. uh, from our history of our culture. e. well, that's right, lin is the same faith in god all that with her resistance to evil, violence can become a national evil force. yes? and yet it is a very complex concept, one that i think needs to be discussed separately. here you need

to take to read many philosophers who argued about this, but non-resistance to evil forces in the gospel, when it is said about not turning the other cheek. it applies to you personally. if to me to an individual person, but, that is, if a person is personally ready to suffer, we meekly harm him, then, uh, he will receive a reward from god, but this does not mean that there is, let's say, but he sees men as offending, well not offending. yeah uh, well, let's say his wife is his kids. uh, how to expose danger does not offend, but endangers attacking his wife and his children, right? or just a person on the street. not necessarily a man. now, if you are there, i don’t know you have a spray can in your purse, if you have it , you will see that some girl was attacked on the street. well, probably, you will still try to protect her, or at least call people who will protect them, they use force, they use force in relation, and

use attackers. they protected e man from evil force, so this is such a concept that you need to reason, to which you need to explain, if you do not ask for protection, but a person may and is no longer able to ask, and maybe a person and in the end. what does it mean that he doesn’t ask for protection, that is , he attacks a person, but if he doesn’t ask for protection, then either they shut his mouth, or he doesn’t understand what is happening to him and there is hardly a person who is being attacked, on who is raped or beaten, who would like the continuation of this process. that's why non-resistance to evil forces is such a thing, uh, that you really need reason. ah, in continuation of the initial military training from the fifth grade, six out of ten

russians approved in the country. against this. although these basics, despite their name. although, as far as i understand, er, it was not only, mainly orthodox culture. we have a confessional country of justified and buddhism and judaism. and uh, islam and so on. you do not it's a shame that uh when well were going to just one class a week to lead the basics. let's say that the religion of conduct for schoolchildren was such a position, and six out of ten parents support the military training of children from the fifth grade, if exactly what to answer, in order to clarify this point. mm the subject is called the foundations of religious cultures and secular ethics. and there are several modules to choose from. eh, parents. this may be the basis of the orthodox culture of the foundation, and the islamic culture of the foundations, of all religious cultures or the

teaching of soviet ethics, and his parents, respectively in the fourth. it seems the class chooses. uh, what will they teach, uh, his child is not a subject, so to speak, not of religious content, cultural why it should be offensive, but rather it is about, what a lot and much has changed, in fact, if the same survey had been conducted for a year back. i'm by no means sure the result would have been the same, most likely a number. uh, a positive answer would be much lower, and the world is changing, and our people are changing too. we are in circumstances that a entail profound change. eh, people's understanding. what uh? how do they live? what goes to what to focus on ? so i talked about ideals, and about the russian idea, how to formulate these. yes? this is faith in god, this is russianness, this is sovereignty, and people understand

that, uh, they also understand what is needed, but it needs to change, therefore, this year, unlike if then i would just repeat it would have been done a year ago, they answered so because they understand external circumstances. i think that and if there would be a question regarding, mmm teaching, uh, religious cultures, he , too, no matter how much the percentage would be, the percentage would be higher than it used to be, firstly, because people are also used to this, and secondly, because many people understand what is needed focus more and more focus on the highest values, and then actually there is another very simple point that and as you say, the basis of military training, right? well, he's obviously obvious now. why did people answer that way, but the question, um, understanding that you need to focus on the highest values, it comes to people, but he, too, needs to be conveyed this question. well

, education. this is a question. uh, well, including, after all, sermons, yes, if you talk about it from the point of view of a priest on the pulpit exactly what it's called, but which concerns hmm spiritual moral values. yes, it seems, yes somehow, that's what it's called. this is also something relatively new, when the legal acts of our country are affected. it's not just economics issues there, if we talk about in the criminal code, the issues of e, justice, a, and so on, a, address issues that are fundamental, but ethical and moral, and moral from the point of view of precisely the metaphysical, and not just from the point of view of punishment for the crime committed there. and we are changing the world is changing. and even today , recently, and the name of god was e for the first time yes, in uh

it is mentioned in the constitution, these are also significant changes, but such changes in the souls of people in the minds of people, they take much more time than to suddenly understand that the basis of military training is really not interfere, so women serve in the army, a woman in israel was generally asked if women in russia should serve. i think not. you pay a lot of attention to a lot of posts in the telegram channel. recently, the situation with the russian cemetery in paris in sangeveya in virgo here is paris head of the growth of cooperation. primakov said that the situation. well, let's say smith lemondon. uh, french buildings, it's not that serious, it's more a matter of money french, just bargaining. what is actually happening around this cemetery? well, i after all, well, not a living france for a long time although , of course, in general, communicating with those who have become, i have relatives i know there and, of course, here,

first of all, the question is, uh, legal and such international relations. eh, straight-forward, of course, is more competent. uh can tell about what is happening there, but as far as i understand, as far as really on the very first day when this news got out, i contacted one of my acquaintances, who may know about the situation, the situation is very simple hmm at the russian cemetery in senj. depot, actually. russian, it is called by tradition. although there is already a very large part, but it is, well, there are not russians, that is, this is the municipal cemetery of the part that historically buried russian people. well, now it has grown far beyond this part. uh, russian cemetery with an engineer there are several. uh, let's say there are two parts, there is a historical part where, well, where there is a historical part, where white white officers are buried . uh, the participants in the white movement are some prominent migrants, and this part, as far as

i understand, is. how much did he write my interlocutor, at least it is a historical monument. and in general, nothing threatens, like any historical monument, but another thing is that there are a lot of graves around this part of the russian cemetery. well, let's just say ordinary russian emigrants, ordinary people whose names are known to few people, if the graves of those people whose descendants are still alive and pay rent accordingly. e of the cemetery place to take care of these graves, but there are many, many of those, of course, who have no descendants left. not left relatives. uh, the unknown people who are buried here are russian people. and it was precisely for the rent of these graves, as far as i understand, that the russian state paid. it was like that. well, a noble desire to preserve the memory of those who were once forced to leave our fatherland well, that's the reason why this happened. i don't know,

well i guess. and what, firstly, we e of this city, i repeat, refused to add up the initial. from payment from the money of the russian state, and firstly, because, because of the international situation, they say not to take yes, this russia has money, it is in line with it, and russophobia is in the west. and secondly, i do not exclude. although here, in order to accuse mm with conviction, but you need to have facts, and do not exclude that, uh? there is also a mercantile interest, because the cemetery place. if released, it is income. yes, we can put it there , but we can rent it to someone else, that is, the remains, if any, but are exhumed, transferred to the ossuary and, accordingly, the place can be sold. grow it very cynically. now, if that's the case, it's certainly awful. well, or

otherwise hmm think that the hype that has been raised around this topic, even if the reason. how much she benefited from refusing to accept money from the russian state, because just the other day the mayor's office of sainte-de-bois announced that no one would ever touch russian graves, that is, of course, if after this hype someone touched, then, of course, it would be very easy to point a finger at the fact that the mayor's office is fighting calm people. mary violates. uh, the dream of the dead, and that, well, that would be shameful and mary of course, immediately denied such a possibility, perhaps precisely due to the fact that the hype was raised. so now , as far as i understand, and the severity of the topic is not so closely followed, of course, behind this story for the development around the russian cemetery near

paris. and vladyka, i thank you for coming to the studio and being our guests. thank you for inviting me.

if you get the jews out of here, we'll introduce you to the rank. this is the front line. this is where to withdraw from the director of the liquidation. save what it is, remember it, we never lost it, even the worst times that they do. they pray meet. this is how it will come, they've been praying for it for 2,000 years. and how will the groom in hebrew you do not know the two who

shoot together? want?

about the main events of this minute in our news release, ukrainian troops attacked novaya kakhovka in the kherson region, according to local authorities, residential buildings on the spot came under artillery shelling. the woman died. and another one was wounded and in donetsk more than 2,000 people are now without electricity, the city today, again under fire from the armed forces in the quarters of donetsk, as well as in the villages of old mikhailovka and panteleymonovka, fired more than 20 nato-caliber shells. russian air defense system shot down ukrainian