they were offended when sergey viktorovich lavrov made a comparison and then the americans. they said it's even insulting. intonation itself, listen to what the head of the european diplomatic service says, what the head of the european diplomatic service says . let's remember that russia is a great country, a great

nation, and she is used to fighting to the end. she was barely used to losing and then winning back. she did. she did this with napoleon. it would be absurd with hitler to think that russia lost the war or that her the military are incompetent, therefore, now it is necessary to continue to arm ukraine with the material and military means necessary for waging such a war, which should be not only defensive, but also one that will allow it to take the initiative in its own hands, idiot patent. or, like the italians, they say politely pokku inkolichenko a little bit, yes, a little bit of the brain is not enough. he directly, he says, it didn’t turn out to spit and it turned out to be a survivor, therefore, we need to do everything to make it work for us. he puts himself inside these chains and obviously that they will give the whole nazis the germans wipe their

hands, they will break. now they are saying that we will provide 19 training tanks. some suddenly realize what this will lead to. there are still sound voices in germany, but i'm afraid no one will hear them. let's listen to a couple of healthy people from germany. this is an interesting approach that you are using here german tanks against russia in ukraine. by the way, your grandfathers already tried to do this with millers and banders. and what is the result of the untold suffering of millions of deaths with both sides and finally russian tanks here in berlin and two of them are standing here in front and you have to pass by them every morning and remember this, dear colleagues from the union, you should not be subordinate to nato or the us embassy or american arms

companies. you must obey the citizens of germany and the citizens of germany don't want this war the citizens of germany don't want this escalation the citizens of germany don't want these arms shipments and so we don't agree with this proposal, yes. alternatives for germany parties, by the way, support him and representatives from the left party ditmar, barch. your competition, who will send more weapons not a millimeter, nor bring us closer to the world, explain to me two things, what will happen after the supply of battle tanks, what will be the next combat aircraft tornado can eurofighter. or maybe the soldiers of the bundeswehr are such a logic who believes that they can win a war against a nuclear power. you don't understand anything. but the americans understand everything and the

americans will be happy with europe starting to fight for american interests. and even more so it's funny when they scream. yes, a teleporter, but it’s that tanks, not our tanks, i still like it, like through a lip. now ukrainian political rats are getting europe what and how they should give a daughter, when you talk about the fact that even in the west they began to say that this is not a regional conflict, this is a serious world conflict, they recalled an interview with a press conference, more precisely, lavrov i recall in this regard questions from one of the icelandic correspondents who asked the question. i can’t vouch for the sharpness of the next such content, but he said that more a few years ago in such ropes as nioliberalism. e on the second third world war. eh, everything. it sounded very marginal

from the lips of gennady andreevich zyuganov and now it sounds from your lips, mr. lavrov, answer this is the position of the leadership. russian federation well, this is actually, this is the position of the west today, when they do not just deliver. this is the weapon from which ours is killed and is no longer political there. uh, the supremacy of this or that party for what we fought. we have always been honest in this sense, we have always said that this globalism is not liberalism, sooner or later it will bring us into conflict with the west. uh, we're not happy about it, we're not happy about it . i even spoke yesterday with one of my comrades. he tells me, you know, sometimes such an am arises in my brain, russians are fighting russians with bandera commanders from

nato generals. this is what happens, really sometimes sensations. you know, because we always said ukrainians are russians. when i spoke with the bulls, i asked who we were fighting with. well i'm there big fragments, i will show on solovyov because many interviews were and speak as a mirror. yes , i say, what's the difference? why, you know, i went into houses here, i didn’t see a single book. sometimes i saw religious ones. well, i don’t want it to be like this. yes, we are zombified, but dirty, but still a mirror, but i would like to be here, uh, vladimir dolphinovich, on the one hand, thanking you for what you once again show human eye face war military events. e hmm what you always urge to go no further

calm down, when you show the pilot the weapons technique, i just remember from myself when you showed the helicopter pilots. i remember many years ago. i was on my road, not in the samara region. in the syzran flight school, which serdikov actually closed. and a few years before that, they actually didn’t fly, because they didn’t have hot water, they didn’t have fuel. and only in 2000, a little closer to the tenth year, they began to fly and improve with might and main. that's when you 're talking about how they're better than formula 1, and such, but for this they needed to return, of course, back to the army in peaceful conditions. i remember i was sitting. uh, so i worked in uh with russia in the early nineties, and next to it is the academy of the strategic missile forces next to it very close. this is the first thing we do in chinatown. such academies were closed, because they were in the most varnish,

their pieces were in moscow, they were closed in order to build something there, when i spoke to you about this weapon to us about its testing, i’m just saying such institutions. you were then accused of calling for the use of, uh, nuclear weapons, but no one is measured. and there you are, uh, you im. confirm comrade general, dear did not say that, in fact, tactical nuclear weapons were not invented by us, but by the americans and put into service in the fifties for use in europe against the soviet union by soviet tank colonies, and we have more than two million there there was a grouping and here they are, just for this they invented it it is for this, to live the defense, so as not to waste manpower. you know, this is such a russian shifter. now we are talking about application. yes, we are talking about the fact that if it means at least let's say today, i am

my fellow politician from the executive branch of the presidential administration. let 's take this path and renounce some agreements, but more can be said about this, alexander mikhailovich, especially in the economic sphere. although i mean this. that is, i would like to draw one more parallel, this barrel said about two warriors who were for us domestic soldiers. he said this is a little inside out, praising the russians in russia in particular for these two military victories in napoleon and in 41. uh, forty-five. no, he does not praise, he draws conclusions that now we need to achieve now we need to put pressure, but oh, i would like to remember, uh, another war that was accompanied by the formation of a new russian state after the horde in the 15th-16th centuries, when on the same the most southern russian lands later, which turned into russian and then russian, and we fought for existence with the crimean khanate with the crimean

chaos, which at first is also a paradox. it 's like with ukraine, you can first fight with us together. they supported us against the poles and lithuanians, when we were able to be famous on the ugra and distracted, the poles or this prince, and then they began to fight with us for the astrakhan khanate for kazan and we had no more. nothing else. as it is already there in 1.570, it means to apply to them. although they even burned moscow. here is the first first fire. you remember them. well, burned down moscow, we had nothing left. we started to fight with them, and then we had to nihilate. this state called the crimean khans and take him away in order to secure themselves. uh, danger, or rather to eliminate it for your state. here is my state of e about today. i draw this analogy with the war of the 15th-16th centuries, which we have to conduct here today, but i would like to say a little more

about what we need to do in order to win, what do you do when you talk about armaments speak about the living force, you and i know the state of today. weapons in europe, if you add up nato and our military force is about 3,5 to one, i repeat once again, they use russian ukrainians, of which there are also many. well, plus our own. yes, for now. so, in order to resist this, well, just by arithmetic, you need to understand what it means, we need to produce at least as many weapons, and then we have the same number of people to put under arms, either or some other methods. well, oh, which i don't want to talk about right now, it has to be done, of course it has to to do and it will not arise out of thin air from nowhere in this connection. last time we talked about culture, your transfer, well, the transfer of other patriot guys, they are not useless. here you said, they

some whoops whoops. uh, from the so -called pseudo-intelligentsia. nazarov with his wife followed some conclusions from the theater directors. yes, but they are certainly not enough. i'm here when they tell me, and i've been talking about it all the time about these performances until now. i said get out. what are you waiting for when people come from the war and exclaimed? those or other offices, they already have such zakhar prilepin he has been since the war. he's already from the war, they traveled all the time. there to us immediately means, the first, uh, the head of the dpr means these other guys who died. by the way, we came up with an offer. our committee came up with a proposal on the advice of the house that the title of hero of russia should come with this, i support russia 100%, the council of the house came out with its appeal. yes thank you. well, firstly, i

believe that not only zakharchenko, but also motorola's givi , of course, is not there yet. yes, and there are a lot of guys, as well as now pilots. well listen, well, here's the guy who saved the plane. yes, which is already there many, many of their sorties, but legend well, of course, this helicopter pilot almaz is worthy of the title of hero of russia, which, well, really saves lives there. well well, this is the hero i have no right to, that is, there are procedures. in no way am i going to prompt anyone to point it out, but i just see people with my own eyes, and of course, with admiration. we must initiate here, there should not be any, including who is ahead, who was earlier, but when i spoke, uh , i recalled this example from culture recently one conversation. i listened to her on the radio radio there is russia with his father alexander from lugansk when he gave one example. here it is

for any person from any political party. even from the communist sometimes. this example reverses what is happening now for all these 30 years. so, he called and the church called for a certain order. and, uh, a certain fundamental principle is the spirit of the soul of the body. here they usually sound like their calls for a certain relationship to life. and for 30 years he was talking about it in russia was the body, and then the soul. ah spirits there can be at all not to speak. and so it was. yes body soul. and finally, russia is turning back. i need to do it faster, and i'm going back to finish. eh, with these calls. i would like to give a few more examples. i have already called for this several times. do you remember. i say you

argued with me over electricity, gas, oil products. can we lower the price of them? we can't. we just can. we have to. so i recently spoke to my kazakh comrades kazakhstan, which also extracts, as we do oil. they have lower prices for oil products for domestic consumption . i'm not talking about turkmenistan or libya there. why am i talking about this? even after the war there was a decrease in prices, in our country the great patriotic war attributed this and caused a certain moral interest for society, and at the same time for the economy. you don't even need to cut taxes. you don't even need to provide additional resources. this immediately reduces the cost of production right? sash lowers why ca n't we do it? they tell me wto i i say why foreign auditors are still working. in our country they renamed themselves bi-4. yes, the requirements for all our economic structures also work everywhere. who produces more than

800 million a year, who has a turnover of more than 800 million rubles. they are required to submit two accounting departments for ours at the mfc. well, you know, these are the things that we today and in parliament, together with the ministry of finance, must immediately do and correct immediately after the advertisement is released from this. before advertising we'll take care of it. it will be honest detective.

here i would like to start

with something else, but again thank you, thank you, of course, for your visits to the territory. they show once again that in our country a whole mass of people is not being formed, they are not only military, but those who supply our advanced weapons with everything necessary, surely noticed that i was in a different uniform. this time. this vpku 2.0 at the request of the advanced guys. here it was developed just this, only with such camouflage a large number of copies will be done, it will be well, first there, according to the requirements of specialists, so to speak

, inside the armed forces who are very, very good at it, and they gave me the right to test and tell what is good, what is bad , what is it to the ministry of defense. the military personnel who saw him really liked it did not look, the pike says, and we have one and you. no , it works perfectly. everything there is all our experts, too, then. well, if you get, volunteers, go help. by the way, not a bad idea kids forum experts. i like mine conversations, not only heroism, professionalism , patriotism, but also drew attention to the fact that at least this is the category of people who today are very impossible to surprise with cunning, but the main thing is to reprofil them, how would they or change their position, because they understand they hear and want to communicate in a truthful language in general with

those who today not only direct, precisely, because they supply the setting of tasks, and so on. that is, this is a direct dialogue, and i would very much like the whole country and the economy to she also absorbed herself. this, of course, is a process. there is no need to speculate on this here, but we still have a lot to do and we should not feel that this is the rear in itself? no , it's you for the front that's connected and things more than that, we need to not only provide. eh, victory procession on the fronts. even today we must prepare for much greater tests, and our economy must work ahead of the curve. and here i am right away, i would not talk about it, it is unworthy, maybe a lot of attention, but this is an important aspect today that has passed. hey forum. yes, what did he show, he showed that the west is in a panic, today he scares the whole world than the fragmentation of the economy, the ecological crisis, the food crisis, he scares with world trade

wars, because this is the only way to consolidate around him all the rest who are still ready for to this, and most importantly - to transfer to itself the functions of managing the process. and let's see what happens in parallel with this, of course, not at the same time, but in parallel. it's a show with it in the same place, even more so there was no russia, no china why yes, because these are just those states that, together with other non-western states. today they demonstrate something else. what they are talking about, but military technical security, but food. security about environmental security about energy security, and financial sovereignty and financial security, and moreover, they suggest that our countries heh see other partners, joining forces to solve not only their own and the former not so much their own. how many world problems? and this this is the topic of future exports, including this group of countries for other non- western countries, about which those problems that i

spoke about. or rather, those methods of solving the problem that i have named, but i would like to talk a little about the financial sovereignty of financial security. today we are talking about the fact that the ruble is, well, a kind of currency that can afford to be an investment and reserve currency. well, there are 25 aspects here. if we talk about the external factor, then, of course, the ruble today cannot fulfill this for the simple reason that it is not enough today not only the commodity turnover of services and so on in rubles is in demand. but the yuan cannot even do this, but our countries are working on developing the mechanism that will allow giving birth to tutu, which will provide all this , moreover, it is our countries that have the necessary reserve that will allow us to give a basis for evolution, experts say today, but a whole group of goods. there it goes off scale for more than 30-40 positions, this is raw materials and much more, in order to make this future currency reliable, and in different from the dollar. there euro or pound sterling. so, in the outer uh perimeter, of course, it is difficult and here we do not pretend

to be a gladiod. well, within the country within the country, we must say that the ruble is an investment reserve currency. why am i talking about this? i'll literally go back, uh for a second, to the external factor. why because we have to talk about it, what is our active aggressive role in the good sense of the word, that we can today have accumulated $ 300 billion even this year , but let's not compare use. well, that side is difficult for us. this is not only because we do not want to give us yet . it's closed and so on. let's send now actively, let's send aggressively to help. an african latin american, moreover, in the form of loans, even interest-free, but allowing them to form their own production there. what is it for, developing the economy of these states. we are orienting them towards ourselves and we need to stop importing food, for example, from those countries that today are not squads. but helping these countries that i listed africa in latin america, we will create the prerequisites for the revival of the production of products that we will consume and pay for those

loans that are issued, which can be issued both in foreign currency and in rubles, thereby loading our own economy, so this is a whole spectrum of it should not be shy. and, on the contrary, it is necessary to demonstrate to the whole world readiness for this. now the internal situation, if we are talking about the reserve or investment component of the ruble. what does this mean that today we see where and how we can inject money. we are about it often we speak our programs. i would like to say about one thing, that if we look at what the world project is doing today, a lot is great today. with the government , such terms as, for example, low-income credit appear. e project, that is, you know, there are projects that we see that they can be implemented within 5-7 years. under them, rather preferential financing is given, the subsidizing rate, including the cost price, and so on, but there are those areas in the industry that are unprofitable, and some even not at all profitable, but not needed in the country. it's for the sake of electronics it's also listed ad infinitum. we see that uh

maturity, well unbelievable in size. well, shouldn't it be done? this must be done by the state through planning through an understanding of resources, these programs should be financed, even if they are not profitable, but they are not profitable here. they are profitable in general for the economy, because they allow us to revive our strength and make it sovereign and independent. and when we talk today about the fact that such conversations. soon the money will run out, or maybe the trend is that it will not end. yes, i agree, what money. yes, those that we have in the form of currency, of course, firstly, they will not end, because in our opinion our history shows that there is a trade professional here. he was and will be. it will simply decrease there, but it will . and this money may run out, or at least decrease, but they cannot run out of rubles, because we need to return to political economy, not to economics, which was taught all this, uh, our liberal economists, but to the policy of economy, where it is written that money is for a universal equivalent between goods and services. and if let's look

pro us aside. i'm not talking about other countries. our country possesses metal from this metal. we can make machine tools and we can build a plant. we have raw materials that will be processed, at this plant we have the brains of professionals there , engineers who can do all this . we have people and hands that can work at this plant, we have people who will consume this product. we need rubles for what, to lubricate these mechanism from earned. all together, do not turn the financial. cast sphere, let it all work. so this is our side, can afford it. so why do we say that we have all this, but there is no money, since we have all this and there is always money for it. maybe the state, well, do not scare the word to print, issue, provide and thus earn our economy, and we must strive for sovereignty, because this is the guarantee of our beauty. for me every time when there's another rammstein i think

it's coming as such a boost to our production. that is, how many tanks they want to supply you. how much they have and i perceive it, how we need to multiply the plan for the production of tanks by two and put it to me that it seems that we need to be very actively engaged in military-political cooperation, but 50 nazi countries are fighting against us. satanic countries and it is obvious that ukraine is something? there is no military-industrial complex for a long time, but now all this satanic vvk is working against it. why are we not we use vk i can't understand it? it seems to me that the psychological emotional not only the technical it would make a lot of sense to pull out not to lose friends to give away the opportunity.

this is really in the seventies and eighties in order to neutralize the advantages of the soviet well, the warsaw pact, in fact, the soviet union, which surpassed nato, uh, in armor somewhere around 6-7 times. yes, they adopted the doctrine, so to speak, of compensating for their e for their inferiority. uh, by uh, the use of tactical nuclear weapons. we uh, here we are negotiations on an adapted treaty on this affected forces in europe in the late nineties said the same thing as

tactical nuclear weapons. this is the equalizer of your superiority to your advantage in conventional weapons. these are not secrets. i am not talking about this publicly and officially, and officially they know this, so their pressure on tactical nuclear weapons is on us. it's so normalized, because they understand, uh, the relative disadvantage of their position. now e on ramsteins.

here