we proceed from the premise that the problem of our security and the problem of a new world order is the problem of such a world order in which we can live in peace and develop together with those who want more on an equal footing. to live and develop is the elimination of the united states inflicting such a defeat on them. as a result, which they will not be able to dictate their will. not europe, not all the rest of the world. i'm

talking about it now. how is the historian political scientist, but at the same time i am convinced that this is the real goal of the task and there is no need to be afraid of it, and not to be afraid is possible only in one way, realizing that we have been waging this war for 80 years. uh, forty-five . it lasts 80 years, and in this war there were different things and they stood over the abyss worse, than now, by the way, in the same nineties. well , and by the way, we had an analogue of the caribbean crisis and we should be afraid of it now, the last thing about hysteria. well, andrei valeryevich will be here, of course, cards in hand, and it's easy for me to agree with the colonel general. here, but i also believe that the situation that has developed in the theater of military operations to this time is critical for ukraine and causes a state of hmm panic hysteria. their

owners, here it was demonstrated by the company that did not hold a start-up company gave zaraiz shackles with a cry. all the logic is gone, the client is leaving. it was literally said. now, if now everything that we can do not dump there. that's it, we'll be finished. here, under this bench, it means a three-week company. and here is the result with tanks and so on, so the nearest expert, what do they hope for? and what they will now have time to quickly drive there so that the front does not collapse decisively and swiftly. as a result, this is the main fear and the main danger of this current minute. now as for, uh, the united states is in the industry if our enemy is in hiding. first for ukraine, then for europe what is our task, based on this, you know that our enemy is hiding there, at least behind two false

panels that are going to let the enemy into the field, he will have to get out of his ambush in which he sits. and the enemy doesn't want to. i'm here for today. well, get out the toast, which she said, and we say, you won’t have time to put the abrams before the end of spring, we definitely won’t have time. and i don't even know how it will go on. because i believe that the americans will try to do so, and will do everything for as long as possible. how long can they not go with us to the distance of a direct shot, because a direct shot is at this distance. for them, it turns out to be fatal. they know it. they need three to five years to solve or try to solve the problems that they have in the dispute

strategic nuclear forces. or find, at least some solution for this, an exit to e, the distance of a direct shot. i speak figuratively. eh with this disparity. for them , it is fatal. they will avoid it by all means. on this area. our task is to throw back and overcome the pants, or how ukrainian is such european and achieve. no relationship with our main and principled enemy. this is how i understand the situation. this is how i understand the situation. but the northern war - this is a good question, because the president of the caribbean there is a crisis, well, i will continue from there , how would dima give me a wonderful pass? i believe, well i believe that, of course, no nuclear war. yes , there will be no nuclear war, so to speak , in exactly the same way as there will be no said that there will be. well, of course, the state of a direct shot, the united states nuclear strike is a state of a direct shot. this does not

mean the shot itself, it means, uh, yes, uh, another caribbean crisis there. yes, that's for sure, but uh, i don't think i'm going to try to explain any of this. why and actually what to do? i really believe you. these are the so-called false panels, i use uh, or rather, as if mediators in the war. the united states is at war with us. in addition, 10 explained what she meant. just like so many experts, the most responsible western americans say yes there is a war, they are straight they are exactly what they are doing. that's how all statements are. here, if you read, uh, in addition to anna lena burbock is wonderful, what western politicians say, they say, precisely that no, we are not a country of conflicts. here we are not de jura party to the military conflict. not with russia. show where my participation is not, american citizens. well, i don't know. we do not follow my freedom of movement biden. refused two people who say so. clearly presented there, she says, we do not have

information about this location in terms of everything that our world believes in part, our president and even our united states department of defense does not cross any red lines. in order to create an incident beli confidential war of the usual everything they violate anything they do, on top of the effort, damn it, of course go over, so they created a very convenient situation for themselves not a direct war. they break everything, right? not a single minute of a mile in a straight line is planning a military operation to admit it is written everywhere, that it turns out, firstly, the theory is different, where it should be written that it is an incident of white. in what legal document does he spell out what is a casusombel, do you want him and here is a farthion, and also what would be stated in our diplomatic notes, since russia is not an input in their diplomatic notes. note did not say that, for example, deliveries of hymers. delivery means, respectively, tanks.

the supply still has intelligence, the planning of military operations that take place on the territory of the russian federation cannot but be an incident. well, but they are not. no , they are not, because for some reason we have not yet announced. well, why can i say? why not change yours? well, on the dungali, then, uh, i am i after all. here look. i understand that i am standing on shaky ground. disputes with the bailey incident leading us once again arise when the side considers that they have caused such damage and have been made, which is the belli incident, that is, a reason for war. she announces this occasion in the map, and he wrote it down. this was written in all the other documents that existed before the un fathers and before that other various connections the war was korean korean remind that after that no one understands anything. so same, so

wait a second. no, the americans have declared war, whoever doesn't, they don't declare war on vietnam, because the crayfish no, they carried out special operations everywhere. yes, of course, of course , that's it. the whole point is in america , because there is no point in war. so, as if there was a cold war. let's just exist, two centers of forces, two centers of forces in these centers. this means that basta's address is exactly all power, both ideological and military, and all other economic and so on. all other countries were considered as a field of war and indirect wars, then all fought, therefore, no other war between the ussr and the usa could be declared, in general, for a simple reason, everything else is not a war, but a chess game between on our territory is true, because they came up with a technology that we have nothing to cover yet. what's the matter, the only thing we are going to cover it with and what and we have two things to say, well, some experts say it has come and the era of mass has not come

guys just like there will be no nuclear war. and if it does then i'm the losers passage of debt. here is a very simple situation , they came up with the technology of indirect warfare. they violate everything in a row, everything, except for one legal reason, because we don’t recognize, by the way, speaking, fighters will appear and tomahawks will appear, they don’t recognize that the crews there will actually be none sure that we don’t recognize, because they don’t recognize nuclear war. she needs to win. they go to the area. that's all. well, that's interesting. nuclear weapons, because it's idiotic to have been wasting public money for 80 years, to create a more restrained weapon that did not hold back. but you see what technology they came up with. so what they came up with is, well, a year we have operations that we all talk about, so lavrov says at a press conference, but he doesn’t send a note about what actually actually gets higher, which

we see now will continue to don't interrupt in the middle right after the commercial. yes, well, i will continue about this situation, they really worked out well. this is the tactics of indirect

war, and taking into account, yes, uh, that knowledge, which they had. strictly speaking about our internal political structure, partly our political knowledge elite. these are not up to par right now. what they were under the soviet union, but nevertheless it was enough to carefully develop a schedule for building up stands such that there is nothing other than expressing concern and stating at press conferences that nato is really involved in this conflict. well, and they are not afraid more than that, so to speak. now they are much less afraid of escalation than when they even started to carry old soviet weapons across the border through western ukraine, and it is, of course. so there are two ways out of here. well, more precisely, the first three way out is to remain locked in this theater of operations and try to use conventional military operations and fight, so to speak, against the entire nato bloc , which is more precisely the united states, that is, we are not in a direct war. at the same time, it constantly emphasizes that they are not participating in this conflict. and by the way, thanks to this, they do not make this war, they do not make this war.

the problem of their internal public they bypass it anyway. that's why the poll results are so strange, now you can, which means you can do nothing, as i said, you can, well, the whole world is in ruins there, because no limited nuclear strike there will be limited, it's obvious. view there is a third option. why is this obvious? not well, really for some reason at all, well, well, let's imagine. i certainly understand. okay, let's try, in case we don't get to heaven at the targets. well, as it were, why are tactical nuclear weapons not the most powerful existing charges? well in response to subsequent problems. well, listen, well, in response, from whom the blow will follow. of course they understand that they have no meaning, because and so on, as the vampire writes. so

let's do it again. so the first option is to remain locked in this theater of operations and continue to run into a confidential war. give them the opportunity to develop this tactic of indirect warfare, which means that they will smuggle an aircraft carrier into ukraine. so there is a second option to hit with a nuclear bomb in the hope that this will solve our problems. well, they will supply tactical nuclear weapons to ukraine, in which case it’s good, but it’s obvious that they will have it yes, when a tactical nuclear strike on our city follows. what we are doing is hitting the usa. i'm telling you, the whole world will not lead to dust. here or give the opportunity to destroy russia correctly. fine. let's act like forever. here, as in the nineties, how to look for kozyrev. well, guys, what

does it mean to say right away, let's get away from our nuclear weapons, quietly. let's break up into a principality and crawl on our knees to the side. what do you think, exactly this is to this mine? certainly? no, well, yes, here, well, let him call. why does he want yes, as it were, well, he recognizes you as an accomplice understands the change of the ruling coalition, so to speak , the democratic usa but this is a topic for a separate discussion. not at all now she. well, that 's not the point here. but there is still a third way out here, firstly, it is necessary not to clearly and unambiguously declare that de facto nato is part of the secret, to say that we know what kind of war you are waging and from now on, so that this was spoken at a high level. we are also starting to wage an indirect war against you and , of course, start with military-technical cooperation, the north korean people's political republic this is the first second to lift all sanctions on iran no silver. he said, then, accordingly, to bring 50,000 koreans into the territory of russia for construction work, and so that they get lost, what the hell is our territory here , right? yes, further it is necessary to understand russia

truth or not to inflict opposite the state officials of the united states, this can be regarded by them as an excavation, but we are not. we are playing indirect warfare. we will ask the iranian comrades, the syrian comrades, the north korean comrades, to take action against commercial structures, students, participating in this channel, everything. i won’t tell the rest on the air, but there are such options, you just need to show that there is a new type of war. yes, let's continue in the same way there is such a country as china is called, which is fine, we don't know what it wants, which perfectly understands that it is beneficial for them that you there were large deliveries against russia russia who was destroyed? because then less will be supplied against china. when the time comes, it understands well that if god forbid we will lose. they are the following, i do not rule out that the conversation with the chinese north korean iranian comrades is correct. it can

greatly change the picture of hostilities. i don't understand why the red army's mischief was the cup they don't fight they fight. i do not know, but to conduct diplomatic work. yes, there are a lot of things, of which there are a lot may well be represented on the territory of the russian empire, in other words, here it is necessary to open here so much to violate. we can violate everything now that we can now withdraw from the nonproliferation treaty , we must definitely withdraw from any treaty now. which are capable of inflicting stupidity with nuclear weapons no, but the category of stupidity is subjective representation of people. now i can say everything to many people, about what they say that this is stupidity or not. this is a value judgment. someone else will supply ukraine with nuclear weapons today - this is

complete nonsense, that someone will supply ukraine with leopards, abrams he's the scars of nuclear weapons. yes, of course, you must have this video. i 'm something where you say expert well, it's me hooked in this studio saying that russia was not. another option, after the americans demonstrated their carriers of nuclear weapons in ukraine in the region kharkov was i guess when you said from that moment germany began and does not quietly and calmly declare they have nuclear weapons , which prevents them from suddenly obtaining nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine on the same conditions . i would explain that this is with regard to this part in general speaking, we didn't even approach it conceptually. in my opinion. this needs to be developed. we didn't even move there in that direction, but

we must clearly and clearly declare this and begin to act in this direction. because if we will continue to fight conventionally, and they will wage such a hybrid war against us, and finally, the third thing, as it were, that should not be overlooked in any case , that’s all, they are doing it. it's not just that they do it. in order, they understand perfectly well that they will most likely not be able to destroy us. well, as much as possible to restrain our development. right now, at the start of the 21st century, which will affect the entire century. they want us and china very much, with china it is more difficult, it is very difficult economic communication with us them practically. no, so we must also take into account the fact that we must in no case reset our accounts, this curve. here's what joseph biden jr. said not so long ago in march 2022. the idea that we would send offensive weapons to have planes and tanks and trains go there with american pilots and

american crews. just understand, don't be fooled by whatever you say. it's called world war iii. it's clear? well, in the round, that is, once again, but this is technology, how to do it gradually usa yes , he lied, he seemed to bring things, the crew. so there is a crew there, there are no american crews. yes, there are no american pilots. with their own names and do not invent and do not inflate. you're here you said here don't listen to everyone like that, who are fastened, and you told me the russian government. listen to one talking nonsense, and no one paid attention to them attention is the first one said, do not pay attention. why do you pay attention to the fact that this is a fool in germany, they

moved the russian government to call you the posts of those who spoke here, i told you, do not listen to them. this is nonsense to our politicians, right? nazi germany declares war to draw war. how many weapons the soviet union supplied to egypt from syria, your officer sat in each battalion, and the russian general staff of the soviet army planned their operations. did we say that this is a war with you? no, never. it was a war with egypt weapons. yes, the war was from egypt, this was your

position. no, it was not only the position of everyone and the soviet union from the united states no one saw israel in this war of the soviet union, the stakes of weapons. this is not going to war. many countries supply weapons to anyone. this is not yet his participation in the war, even participation when the advisers are not participating in the war. i say this to every battalion of the egyptian army against which i fought. there was a soviet officer sitting there, it was not a war with the soviet union, no, because no one considered. it's like war never war. no one on this globe, like a war council between the israeli soviet union, even when our pilots they fought with yours, and when soviet missilemen fought with israeli pilots and vice versa, and it is specialized as a war in the soviet union and no one considered it in vain. this is how they do it, this

is how international relations go in the world. so it was 50 years ago, nothing has changed. and today it is not considered. no one will go, israel then declared war on jesus, the minister of foreign affairs of israel then publicly said that whether the war was serious, the ussr is a country of no war, you accepted the us ministers. nato state said we are at war with russia crow. not stupid. you're saying this for the fifth time, because let me answer. please, never one country does not pay attention to the unsubstantiated statement of some person, even the president of the declaration of war - this is different. it's not just ruffling non- striguns. this does not happen in the world, this does not happen, no matter how you want and no matter how you announce it.

this is not to say any man, this is not a declaration of war. there is a procedure for declaring war. it wasn't an ad and wouldn't accept it. when doing public speaking, you can say that anything, but in reality it’s not, and all the talk about it is talk in favor of the poor and tankers on the territory of russia, just like it ’s just words on the territory of ukraine. well , this has never been and never will be, and there is no point in this. american nuclear weapons in germany in the hands of american soldiers they will use it and if the danish pilots use american nuclear weapons on their aircraft under

the command of american pilots command, that is, this is a war between the united states and another country. nobody one of them cannot attach this bomb and use it, and a ukrainian pilot can do the same. uk in ukraine there are no nuclear weapons. as long as there are no american nuclear weapons in ukraine, the surest weapons, perhaps, follow the same scheme as american nuclear weapons. maybe there will only be within the framework of the fact that the americans will fight with russia only dachshunds, the united states of america to give it to someone, no one has ever given it to anyone. that's what the doctor said, sosnovsky and who

knows who is erstelman in this country? i i know who ern is, right? i think everyone in this room knows. in certain circles in germany who is a plant?

forgot about it, he's a commie. and they shouldn't be mentioned. you can't mention here what you want from the germans. and why can’t it be mentioned here, and when they emphasize what the nazis did to the communists in that war, who are you talking about this in russia all the time? yes, of course, i didn’t hear it, that is , they constantly talk about this to the communist party during the great patriotic war , it is obvious that they are not communists.

x hero of the politburo who is hiding all the speeches that are about the nazi beasts? the mention of the main victim of the nazis, the communists, is if it happens very, very little and i didn’t say all this accordingly, i affirm this and there is not a single monument on this planet by a communist destroyed by the nazis, in any country there is a r100tel, for example. well, no, there was

a communist and there was a man. wu i tell the party to the party to erect a monument. yes, probably so we don’t have a homosexual monument to me of the monist party, but in russia you didn’t put me up the monument is still not enough to have you on one side. and we have a monument to the family on fire, well, put up a monument to the communists , but this is strange, this is not in the russian federation , because almost all of our iranian officers were communists, of course, i don’t know, well done in any city. now there will be no features later. not very the officers did not

have time.

i noticed a continuation of the conversation in the new episodes of our podcasts, so you don't miss anything subscribe