and their attitude towards us is their attitude. a respected person and a dog, well, or even better there is a wild cat or there, like a fox sick with rabies, well, a promise or all sick with rabies. it is not. here we would all people are equal, yes, how is moses from the mountain? sinai came down with the tablets, and there it was written not kill and they do not have it written, because they have it written in the law, and we are not, so to speak, subjects of their legislation. this is a fundamentally important thing, and for a very long time , for unknown reasons, we have such an attitude towards

yourself. but now that it has become obvious, by the way, in this sense, it is very funny. yes, but the behavior of the poles towards us. you know how this is the behavior of domestic dogs, who are outraged that a cat was brought into the house. well, like, how is it so this is my house , that the dog can also be kicked out or taken to be euthanized. it doesn't occur to her. so, the trick is that 70 trainers feel, i'm confused by these animal images. oh, i have distant animals , a large number of animals, and they interact with each other like this. and very funny so here. i don't understand why we agree. well, why are we still selling oil for

dollars for their dollars as before, right? yes, why don’t we create a ruble exchange and don’t sell oil for rubles , by the way, in this sense the question is, and the price limit in dollars is not worth it oil for dollars i didn’t sell it, and accordingly, er, i can hardly imagine that the european union adopted a law on a limit on the price of oil in rubles. so i can’t face you. i have a question. russian ships cannot transport anything to their ports, because they are not caught, and russian insurance companies do not recognize the issue there. why do we still recognize the company, if a ship comes to us and say, we were insured, i'm sorry, a frivolous

company. you are insured with us, otherwise you cannot get around to the port. why is it not? shower, in the end, let's put it simply, yes, why do we have the post of finance minister is a person who is the head of the imf office, what else are we members in well , how do we get out here, take the minister of finance with us, we have mr. finance head the representative of the imf and the chairman of the central bank , the deputy representative of the imf, this by law defines no concept of another. that is , we really have representatives of the structure. that is, we have. yes well, of course, we still recognize, which means the parties who should lead. who will tell the imf that is, the imf

removes the representative, of course, this one happened a long time ago, how did you do it. no? no, i understand, but it's easy to understand, from what moment no, well, under the soviet union , it was agreed that it was not particularly important in the soviet union, there was no representation we had a representative of mv representative offices, yes, he was foreign, we signed nonsense ingut agreements, but they were neurotified in the fiftieth year, we observed them in the tenth year, we canceled them stalin untied the ruble from the dollar tied it to gold. and after that, i just know this story. one of these old financiers has become , now it's the end of him, you have this article , which means, and that's not all. why, that is, this is not an innovation. no no. it has long been understood that representatives are farther away. accordingly, we allow to foreign

companies received dividends from owning russian companies in dollars. moreover, they take out the number of topics of the ministry of internal affairs in the house. but we also have a share there, of course, but this share does not allow us to influence the decision, of course, we cannot influence the loan to ukraine. i understand, but we have a large share there, but no loans. no, no, that is, well, somewhere, in my opinion, one and a half percent. yes, here, too , a representative jumped down enough there, it's not like their representative here. yes, these are two different things. we as shareholders have a person in darov yes, but in our country, as an organization , he appoints his own person, because the imf charter says that for any country

, i remind you that all western sanctions contradict the wto charter tightly. but no, but we are still members of the wto, and moreover, we, as members of the wto, participate in their courts according to their laws and , accordingly, bend our companies, but i don’t even understand what we are talking about. and who are you now, who is driving? well, who's in charge? this is nonsense of the vutsky institute, as far as i understand, in the same place china is now trying to intercept very strongly. yes, they let china in there and he is there a lot of people are now oriented than america is oriented or america until

it works out. there's a big butt going on inside. this is what happened now, as soon as the americans began to introduce anti-chinese restrictions. they pushed china. seriously, that is, when the question is the main restrictions. there were in the eleventh year in the tenth department. what happens if we leave? the imf and we will leave the btu is nothing structurally for us, it is possible to leave the nws, of course, of course, moreover, i will reveal another terrible secret. we respectively do not have secrets, because we have all the statistics go through goes through yes, and moreover, we must pay tribute to there was a special group under the ministry of finance, which, according to the instructions of the imf , respectively, and how it was developing a strategy for russia at one time it was headed by dvorkovich to this group , sort of disbanded a few years ago outstanding

achievements. well, here's the last one. let's face it. they're taking everything from us, they've destroyed our remains building. they destroyed the planes. they partially collapsed chemistry. eh, they they take away. we have fish and in this situation we need. mobilization economy for a banal reason, we cannot invest in our economy according to the imf rules, because the imf rule is a de facto forbid because. our entire financial system is a budgetary system. all our statistics are built according to the rules of the wvf, and this happened a long time ago. that is, people are already sitting there who studied in echelon only according to these methods, then the only way to ensure the investment process is a mobilization economy. we are poor.

now the government is doing is trying to solve this problem in the defense industry, but the entire economy is not exhausted by the defense industry. it does not make up half of it and even does not make up a quarter, and in this sense it is not clear what to do. and by the way, the last one is the best. today i had a movie i won't tell. where there is no listener for me, as if the presenter asked me. e question. and what do we have, what is it called? economic justifications - an economically justified ruble exchange rate is stupider that asked a counter question to life, if you are the captain of a sailing ship, what is your economically justified wind, it is so thought. where am i sailing? oh well done, we're going , tell me, it seems to me it sounds like a russian ridge. here's where we're going. what kind of economy

we are building, what share of the financial sector we should have. excuse me. we have here how much the banking sector last year turned out to be the question before last. and why can't this money be taken and channeled into investments in a targeted way, because banks will transfer this money into dollars and withdraw it abroad. there i was asked another wonderful question. well, look, we still understand, we increase, as it were, prestige a man of labor, they even carried the title of hero of labor. this is where i got hysterical. i said imagine, but a big portrait on ali. and here is the honorary miner ivan petrovich sidorov, who, with his outstanding work, allowed the owner of the mine, oligarch such and such, to bring not 20, but 30 girls to courchevel this winter in reduced social responsibility. and i didn't make it here. i

decided it online safely. well, well, well , well, yes, well, guys, let's face it , we are in a situation in which we are not just fighting, you know, war, maybe between two knights? yes, there is a prince. according to igorevich yes, as he said the khazars, i'm going to you. yes, because from his point of view. in general, they were equals. so. we are not equal to them. we are rabid foxes for them to hunt. and this is not a crime. and for this reason. we have no right to play with them as if they are decent people. we should not play with her at all with them the only way of relations. this, respectively, in the face is strong so that you understood their place.

hiv yes, well, to complete the parallels with the immortal work of jonathan, swift connects with the fact that yes, michael said there, lilliputians run around, of course, he wakes up around gulliver and is not afraid, but in the next chapter , gulliver takes a vassal oath, to the king or lilliputians and here he uses it for his own purposes of opponents. well, then all the intrigues went there, but it's just a conversation , yes, but these midgets are not as safe as they seem, so this is a very important point, but i'm kind of very grateful that he was yesterday i reminded you the day before, or rather, i reminded you that january 30 is not an anniversary today, that is, yes, you reminded me yesterday. today is the 90th anniversary of hitler's rise to power.

i would like to express one more gratitude to karen georgievich shakhnazarov that he spoke about this here created the mosfilm channel where we can see the amazingly simple impact of the film by grigory roshal in the thirty-eighth year , the open family, probably like no other, only mikhail roma ordinary fascism, probably , compare here transmits this one this work. leon fechtwanger. uh, in the trilogy is included for waiting. it is there a little differently by families, but it is also called the oppengi family. here it is transmitting. this is the suffocating atmosphere of the arrival of nazism, as usual, people who lived nearby, suddenly, for some reason, begin to mock each other and the life of an ordinary family. the well-being of the family turns into horror when every day is a test, when every day you have to

answer the question is it moral or not? can you do it or not? and here is that the most pack of jackals of small people, it transforms the life of a normal person. here in this constant nightmare. you can talk and shoot a lot of films about what adolf hitler's nazism is. what are the parallels with what we see now? honestly, if we took it and wrote about it in the same way and newspapers and political analysts said, here is adolf hitler of the sample 25-27 years old. well, idiot. well , he’s an idiot and then you read a drinking speech, but an ignoramus, uneducated, generally a person not capable of normal managerial activities. he, uh, the number of times when he gathered his cabinet on the fingers can be counted, he did not like to hold a meeting of the government. he loved to read papers, there were specially trained people for him, but how much did he do? and why because

idiots, that's just dangerous, and who surrounded him around? listen, well, this is seven spans over there, a gebel, who was only called a doctor on a formal basis. who there were from genius. actually. i don’t know, maybe someone else yes, and then they are all bloated figures, and because they were behind hitler. who and in the soviet union openly spoke about this krug large german industrialists, and not only german siems, they later blamed the industries that uh produced the cyclone for everything, and all the people who wore uniforms remained. i don’t know hugo boss or hugo bosch it doesn’t matter at all the uniform and the ss were the honorary standards of the influre group. they are still in one form or another. on the eve of alexander, we discussed whether these firms survived or not, most survived. a

now, yes, we are being thrown these crazy statements by the scholz johnsons. listen, ber god , they can be juggled soon. and who is behind them? why are we let 's talk about them, and what about the leaders of large arms companies in the united states , germany, great britain, france, to do with it? how else? here we are and i am a sinner. german business was sometimes pitied here, which, due to the us colonial policy in germany , as a protectorate, is forced to fulfill their will. and is it so at all? here they say that cheap russian raw materials on gas on energy resources built the german economic miracle. and why is it so easy for german business to succumb to dictations, which they seem to destroy by this miracle, because they want to get all this for free, tearing it apart. like this is crazy they are crazy. well, russophobia is a mental illness. so, crazy,

this is a polish politician saying that they shared the spending, they expect to get free access through the colonization in russia , in fact, i think that about these people whose names do not sound. they are also very comfortable. luca locked martin's head of all those steel corporations is there sometimes when you look. that's right, alexander gave an example with metal. how many small firms are there one after another and there’s not no, if you need to make it out, each company has a last name for those who supply the leopard, who provide logistics, this is not only the german government to do this, not only the american government is doing this specific businessmen . we must talk about them, but we must talk about those who chairs these boards of directors. without them , scholz, macrons, johnsons, that’s the very trifle fascisted, right? the second component of the most important thing that made hitler hitler is

the reichswihr, which has become the verm of the military, we talk about nato and we stick forward with toltenberg. well, finally, they showed this admiral and that the military generals are all this elite they are faceless, they don’t have names, there are no names of this group of nato generals and colonels lieutenant colonels who are sitting and is a collective pawn. forget there is no e, the commander of the zaluzhny, but there is collective narrowed and on them, and shoulder straps are not at all located. why don't we say we don't give their names, they have them. and ah , the military elite, if it is possible to know britain like that, the military elite of germany, i know for sure absolutely all the generals and officers of poland - this is a fascist pack. these are people who share this point of view and many of them want to fight russia in politics. maybe somewhere they are afraid, and these

want it, they were brought up for this. they are the spirit, have taken the next important point. correctly we say here did not repent, no germany wehrmacht screening test, committed a crime, any german. it will tell you no. i remember well how there was an exhibition of death camps created on the territory of belarus is true. there was a scandal in germany, as they had nothing to do with it, the germans hid, because of this myth the wehrmacht had nothing to do with it . the soldiers were heroes of the hammers in ribbentrop, raped germans. they also sank ships and so on and hide. for him , there is still no complete repentance in germany that in germany they know this khatyn. we speak ukrainians, listen. yes, they were traitors. homeland from this 118th battalion landscape who commanded them? what was the nationality of oscar dilevanger? who was

the bafzilevsky fonder, who were they, these were the germans who gave orders, and now this moment also appears in germany, but we didn’t do it. it's all our these, so to speak servants. there is no such thing until the end of repentance, and not only there is fascism, after all, we are very often accustomed to perceiving from textbooks how the institutionalized concept should appear for the party of the ussr and those who justify fascism, those who revive it, cling to it was fascism that changed its masks, but it did not change its essence, that's what we now see in the denial of russian culture. this is a struggle against the culture that the nazis introduced before they came to power. here nikolai drozdov was hospitalized. what does he write? this is the whole petty bunch. and how is he there? what was your position on ukraine? here, based on this, we will think whether to sympathize with him or not, the film was released. and then they said, cheburashka

yes, what is there, garmash, how did he behave there, a native of kherson, when the position of a person, when more accurately a person's talent is a person's illness , his happiness or misfortune is evaluated, because he signed or not, a jew or a communist - this is fascism. this is fascism fascism, which has no nationality, but speaking an anniversary. i would still like to finish on february 3rd of the thirty-third year. in the presence of the rx-sphere, hitler stated that their main goal was expansion. uh, it means the living space in the east of the germanization of these territories on february 3, 33 exactly 10 years later, almost to the day , there was the stalin city battle and these are those who trying to revive explicitly or explicitly fascism must remember that after this seizure of nazi power there will always be stalingrad and there will always be berlin and there will be a victory parade

about logistics. there, after all, logistics is not only carried out by official firms, of course. that is, there you can explain in different ways why, relatively speaking, our government does not want to call nazis, for example, there is some german gmp firm, but absolutely everyone. it is known that all these weapons, especially those used for the pentagon for everyone else, as if the guys and carry, uh, relatively speaking, the mafia organizations of eastern europe , remember there was a bulgarian warehouse, you will blow up the spheres of influence between these mafia groups. why so quickly with the russian version came together? why did petrov bashirov appear there , and why did he disappear? you same became understandable, that showdown between them. why did they take it to afghanistan to iraq, and exactly according to the

same, as it were, scheme. yes, at first soviet weapons are easier to master and i say part of nato. there, as it were, it didn’t reach the hammers, apparently, they realized that the army would not work there big. well, these guys, why? why? no matter how they are, here is a clearly clear demonstration of who these people are? why, by the way, no one will create problems for them to live there, in my opinion. this is one of one of their vulnerabilities, because without them they carry on. they don't know how to do it. i understand that they have lobbyists in washington, but i hope we have lobbyists. no. that's what concerns johnson macrons and others. here are european leaders with dreams that they want to buy some of ours there for free resources and so on. well, johnson and macron, two very similar interviews on the same topic, despite everything that mikhail said about them, that they don’t consider them to be people. well, i have a feeling that

they understand perfectly well what rabbits do. neither are we, that is, if you misbehave too much. this is what is not like us. well, that's not a wake-up call. and the amazing thing is, in fact, that these two leaders have one of them, the current second, the former. they still have a future for them. maybe even the future, well, because which is better not. anyway yes, so that we do not talk about johnson, no matter how better they have it, it's better because they all ask the same thing. if you watch the full interview there and look at the time, how long does it take? well, at least a third is devoted to the russian leader, this is an amazing thing. so, first of all , we listen directly to them. the question is from correspondents directly. hear him. how are you so? you did talk to him. how did you miss it like that? you people are from the arbonax, how did you miss it? this is the product, how are you? could it at all? see what happening. here, and the second one says what will happen next, what he will do now. here they

are asking them. well, already journalists. one can understand them by reading. or, probably, they also want to hear what will happen next, yes, in fact, this is some kind of excuse , such an excuse, uh! macron said, yes, yes, to say such a feeling of resentment. uh, johnson said there, so to speak, that he almost threatened there about this, but it's surprising that this is such an attempt. here are the excuses. indeed, that they are this this situation was missed, but what's the matter? why is it that they are asked such a question in practice, of course, i am sure that understanding people are fine. you know that they will not get any resources to ours. well, they won't, but that's ridiculous. well, it’s as if even now it’s clear that even in the wide american british and european press there, it was clear that after all i won’t forget that russia with nuclear weapons, so that the defeat of russia, in principle, is impossible in this sense importantly, the election race has started presidential in the us one of the main issues.

yes, he is not the first, well, the top three is that the biden is the third world war and this does not matter. as if, in a sense, do not wash off. i have often spoken here about how successful i was on their part. with regard to and problematic for us, their tactics of this most indirect war vladimir let's take a look at the whole thing from their side one of the main goals of waging such a war is to prevent this very war from becoming a factor in their own domestic policy not to do not to make it a factor public comment, but since this war has been going on long enough. she began to slowly seep in. in america , this is a much faster process due to the presence of, as it were, simply two parties. that is, as if two political machines, one of them will definitely bring it, if the other does not, so, well, in europe, as far as i understand, despite in general, well, as if a total cleansing of alternative points of view, anyway, it slowly creeps into public disk. of course you are in this

situation. well, what to do to carry out such here are the congresses, where we will now divide, generally speaking, russian is for 100 minutes already a kindergarten. in fact, in a sense , this is really a kindergarten. that's not johnson that's it, that when it becomes a factor in our really internal politics you guys calm down we'll soon share them oil and gas why is it clear that in the united states? it's even logistically, no matter how interesting, but in europe, the europeans. you can tell you freeze two winters. that's how much of this gas. how much will it be as if, in my opinion, focused not very much on some kind of project, but simply on its citizens. that's all for it. that, too , is what needs to be understood, of course, the crisis that mikhail says is superimposed. once such a crisis was not even in 2007, the ninth year of the seventies. it's just that he was arranged differently economic. or it’s curious, because then it really was very serious, as if with them, that is, everyone talks about it, there he is leaving, and there the damn thing

talked a lot about the fact that there was something from the time such-and-such a president is something modern of such-and-such a president. but the economic crisis. look, look what. the whole matter is aggravated by the fact that then, in my opinion, there were 4.5 or a little more in billions of people on the planet in the seventies less than 3 1/2 people now, now there are much more people . yes, this is firstly, uh, and secondly, secondly, yes, in this sense, how to master your own territory. in this case, we have what a giant, when they ask me. and what resource do we have, besides me, we always need to eat gas area that can be explored. and from the point of view of modern knowledge about the economy - this means that you can not know how much money to imitate for what kind of national wealth and the second point? yes , now we are talking about a war in which it is very important to exhibit. that, in my opinion, is very key if we remember the 70s, because after such a hot phase, an attempt is sure to follow. this is not inevitable, because they have a crisis there, which, by the way, was there, and then

the problem of russia began there in the late sixties, in my opinion. historical here no matter how many historical epochs in russia, we do not know how to use the fruits of detente. we relax at this moment relaxed at the beginning of 70 completely because of this we lost. here, and i can also tsarist russia give examples of similar behavior. we finally need this historical lesson, as it were. well, because kirill is still 100. and by the way, we need to prepare for it now, so that we have plans for this period. in my opinion, that's how it is, too, very much, but what will come and come quickly enough. that's for sure. i though i would judge this, because to us, as far as this congress is, it is already a signal that they had nixon in the seventies, who was a genius. well, yes, it's not about them. it's not in them. you see, the problem is that yes, there is time for charismatic good smart leaders there.

yes, they always have a backup in the form of a systemic state and analytical machine, which we don’t have, maybe it was when we don’t have it now, so we now have this apparatus, including an analytical one, but this is the future that it will come very soon, so that then oh, and we thought that it was all war there. there, this year, it is necessary to prepare for this . i am ready to strain as well.