[000:00:00;00] come on, we, too, can’t be not only sick, but we can’t be lonely, but then we need to use all of ours, that’s india and china and the whole of brix and everyone else in order to now collect alliances that would solve our technological problems layer by layer . why not create a reinsurance and insurance company? brix absolutely right , the time has come, huh? why not make the brix space grouping that everyone needs and everyone would put in a little bit of money to work for everyone. yes? now it's time to do it, it's time to do it, and the agenda brix is ​​very often empty collected. here are five states to receive five heads of state again. some well, let's say, as it is called a declaration, but that here they are in

fact for the new world order. yes, everything is fine there against the sanctions here. let's bring technological constructs there. let's put it in there. here are all of these our projects that will work for everything. well thanks. so brilliant performances i just for today all three performances are absolutely brilliant because everywhere they look listen and then he quotes, yes, then, i would like that if i honor there at the stern or at spiegel or someone else, there will be this. well, following vladimir dolzhevich, i wanted to be quoted at the same time in my home walls, no more no less. that 's because, uh, because the secretary of defense of the united states considers it possible to tell the whole world that it provides security. south korea, the united states is ready to use nuclear weapons, then i have to all world humanity, which listened to this

and your question. why do you think that the russian federation, which will ensure its own security, is someone else's there? well, let's not apply all this. why are your politicians lying to you? and when russia says that everything you do leads to a decision point about this, you lie to your population, that this decision point does not exist at the same time loya's daughter. he comes out and says, if necessary, then for south korea, of course, we will burn the word for which vladimir anatolyevich means more than once. well tried somehow speculate. you do not know that this is a quote from the movie, so lordo came out. lord, uh, the head of the pentagon came out and said we're waiting, where is the world's outrage. i want everyone to rise up against

america's nuclear blackmail tomorrow. no, nobody will rise up, but i want to say exactly one thing here. well, you know. where in america, who is supposed to make the decision? so i also think that if this decision is needed, these are stories that you understand nuclear weapons no longer fulfill the function of deterrence. that's nobody will never use it better, therefore it is better to destroy it immediately. here and so on and so on. this is a lie. maz which does not control me, as vladimir ilyich lenin said. this is the bourgeois deception of the western masses. he is in this. excuse me for your words. this, of course, is your role yegorovich . i'm here at last. here i applied your

role to myself. now, if i could quote, gaidai all the time, and there are a lot of things you can quote. this is the first. second, i will not discuss with colleagues about the image of the future, my position is also well known. here, i'll just say. you see, here is one philosopher, sovietsky said, he looks how interesting. humanity moves forward like a crustacean. it looks back to move forward like a cancer, because there is nothing to look at anymore, only the past. by the way, we discussed this with you, and this principle of crustacean movement into the future is genuine and correct, because all the constructions that can be put as guidelines are taken from the past and from where more yes, it is often processed by thinking with mistakes for which you have to

pay dearly. well, by the way, i also spoke here about comprehensive pictures. here is after the experience of the twentieth end of the nineteenth twentieth century human with all the grounding pictures and their realization. uh, it will be impossible to offer the people and the people something of the same type, because it is lived, unlike science with nature, where nature is dead, humanitarian knowledge deals with a living object that learns and it changes, that's why i think that with the image of the future. you don't have to try. well pretend that we are the most smart, and no one else understands anything after, well, after the lived history of a very poor historical education, very many understand what. now at this point.

there is no history today, dmitry drobnitsky. we often have fruitful discussions about the latest program when we saw him, uh, last week. he says, what kind of americans, well done. and i also said this, they came up with this panel and the fact that they can play with proxy, in general, imperial politics, in general, the entire british war. this is exactly how turkey acted as ukraine it was exactly the same on almost the same subject, by the way, a war was unleashed, because after the twelfth year russia had to be thrown out of europe , the british did it, not immediately after the congress of vienna began a policy of removing russia

from this very european concert, and this the policy was crowned come on with the crimean war, for this it was unleashed, but notice when turkey suffered a series of crushing immersions, including sinop. the british had to go out on their own for the first time in their history. because the whole project was collapsing they had to openly go to war with russia this had never happened before and, except for the intervention, uh, then and when after that i wonder, i look at what is happening america britain and pay attention to what the americans, of course, are doing anything so they don't have to. to join here, since england england which keeps history in mind is very interesting . such interesting statements have taken place over these two days. here is one of them from the head of the defense committee of the british parliament.

mr. mr. tobis elwood, who he said bluntly, addressing the brikeshpu. let's show we realize that the world is changing. we are at war in europe. we need to move to martial law. we are involved in this we have mobilized the process and acquisitions. we provide equipment. we need to meet russia face to face. they leave all the work to ukraine, if we see that russia wants to take more action, for example, in the baltic, then there will be expectations that we will take part in this. this will require ground air and naval forces of the army. that's how the british mind knows. that the next step would be to go face to face, because it was already once numb. well, by the way, you know, it's interesting there, they're still creepy. well, i haven’t talked for a long time, but even when i did, they have a joke in the elites. that's what they ask each other. eh

sir, don't you know, uh. what ended the day before yesterday's meeting of the interim committee on crimean affairs well, they asked it there in the fifteenth year of some 2015. well, they treat history like that. they are so they joke about it, than yesterday ended, the temporary meeting of the fish like to joke when the question concerns russia in this way, but at least i came across this and here is the second person. by the way, this is very serious, because he is the head of the defense committee of the parliament for british peace. it's cooler than the minister of turnover in a certain sense, because, well, this is the place where the british policy is made there , they committee of ministers, in short, damn it, cooler than one poseidon well, volodya no, i pay attention attention that i started my

speech with this, that is, yes, well, so quickly swim radioactive. look, they were the most important thing, they say this to the americans. little children in india, this will have to happen. and get ready for the point when you will have to do this, because ukraine will lose, just as turkey will not be sinop, but will be. well, something else, zaporizhia and in kievka there, uh, kharkov-odessa, i don’t know, so that yes, and there will be a situation, as we had with turkey , and we will have to do it and the last deputy minister of defense examination. here is this one today yesterday this today gerald howard said that the west should be aware of creating a coalition and nato countries that would like to send their troops to ukraine should consider

sending troops to ukraine , and this is the step. which will not come, of course, the second. i think that they will even step on it on this step. i am almost convinced that there will be an anatov intervention and there will be a nato expedition. i don't know how the americano brittany will work. polish. that's because will they be able to breed the poles without a roof to climb into it, i think that there are no german fritz. let me take it. yes, it's just going to have to all come together. and here's the point where you'll have to turn to shout mr. austin and uh, then there'll be a discussion that's the only one. actually exists. what are the limits of ensuring the vital security of our country? something tells me that we will make

the right decision at this point. the main thing is that later, when there will be a discharge, snot screams, we did not go. and let's here appeared at once a lot pro-russian governments in europe, the main thing is that we do not repeat the mistakes of the previous détente after the caribbean crisis and the entire lesson of this story after the caribbean crisis, including, before the helsinki conference on security in europe and subsequent all gorbachev's policies that directly inherited this. here, so that we do not repeat any of this. i can not pass around, or rather past the international theme. now the president of belarus is in zimbabwe, where a lot of interesting statements are being made. now in particular alexander lukashenko said, thanked the americans and the western world for leading

the males against us, otherwise it would have been in these fields, and there was such a ceremony - the solemn transfer of belarusian tractors of agricultural equipment. zimbabwe would not have been belarusian tractors, but american german ones , and there it sounded harare that the future, here you say the image of the future, the future belongs to africa , this is the future for this new big world. and well , someone may be bewildered here belarus zimbabwe but in fact, the relationship between minsk and uh, zimbabwe they are very old and here i am to russian politics. i want to move on. now we are talking about a turn to countries that used to be called the third world. this is latin america africa south asia arab east. well, we say, but sergei viktorovich lavrov, with all his talents, will not be enough for all regions. this is how we develop relationships. in particular, with such an authorized president is appointed, and here are big

secrets. no, viktor vladimirovich is a shein. this is a person very close to the president of belarus, who is responsible for the development of these relations. how does the american act, that sometimes such questions are also heard in society. how did we help so much? they are brilliant, how they vote, because the scheme under which the foreign ministry is responsible for everything, but the americans do not have enough of it. let's take latin america the commander of the southern direction is a general there, or there is an admiral , well, now there is a woman there, yes, who also made an important statement that she wants to take it from latin america on a tank and send it and they said, well, you. well, while they said, by the way , they know how to work. even with the first failure americans are not retreating. after the first refusal , they make the following offers, which cannot be refused, by the way, zimbabwe refused. and recall the words of matvienko this summer, when the president of zimbabwe sent the kremlin a letter from washington to the kremlin , where washington strictly recommended not

to develop any ties with the russian federation, and so the americans. there, as a rule, there is a military commander, there is a special envoy, there is a special representative on the line. u.s. congress, that is, the whole in fact in fact, a pool that works in the regions in russia does not have such a thing yet. uh, this is specific, if we want to get efficiency from working in these regions , there should be such authorized people, this is a concrete step. that's how it was in the politburo. uh, soviet times was grigory vasilyevich romanov so well, a well-known member of the poliber, the first secretary of the leningrad party dug. he was in charge of cuba , for example, and that means that he is a member of the politburo, for example, a member of the presidium of the supreme council, he regularly supports direct contacts with fidel castor. and fidel castro knows that with all due respect to the deputy ministers of foreign affairs, to the ambassadors, who are very respected authoritative people, but he knows that this person will call them or simply go into brezhnev's office

to resolve the issue. this, it seems to me, is lacking along the lines of the central committee along the lines of the supreme soviet, and they also traveled as representatives of another line. yes, the special services are definitely military. that's what we are talking about, this question is ripe. well, let's say, here is your deputy prime minister novak yes, alexander valentinovich, he is very authoritative in the countries of the middle east. they will ask each other. who is your special representative, he says, i have novak and who is talking to you, and they will look at me, who, then, there is more authority for them, this is important, because to be successful and it was normal not only to vote in the international arena , but also the supply of technology supply of resources, the real political impact. you need to know these elites. you need to be with them. we have such a mechanism called intergovernmental committee of the commission. and here i am about it, you literally broke. why is it effective is another question. well, there are such people, they work

very hard for the board. political, that's the thing, he's too bureaucratic and has formalized political heavyweights there who can resolve issues. well, that is, in key areas, you understand, you have the right, the commission is too formalized, then what about? i say, well i'll give an example. here prigozhin is now working in the donbass at one time he worked africa that's just not compared with the effectiveness of bags of the past tense , one aspect is working to make it clear, as it seems to me, what vadim frantsevich is talking about. now, if we look at ukrainian history not far away, then the revolution, uh, in ukraine was made by victoria nung, and the vice president, biden, was responsible for the revolution. not obama but the vice-president was appointed in charge and the americans have in all regions the representative for the revolution on earth was victoria well, and this built

a guaranteed chain of decision-making. here. uh, since the vice president can always talk, because there is not only cookies to hand out, somewhere you have to drink bull's blood with milk somewhere, smoke a cigar , smoke golf, play sit, huts and so on. that is, these people need to feel that we are revolutions. and somewhere there may be something similar, if from or the masses, as the same lenin who sent the next important moment, we still need to decide from these countries, there are response signals from moscow is not very heard and this is not one country north korea myanmar iran eritrea zimbabwe venezuela cuba well , the president of cuba has visited moscow in different ways. some time has already passed. we are so far e results. well, not really, we hear say. so at the moment, but this is not one country, who are you, maybe in the west they are called state pariahs.

someone as you like, well, there are regimes that have proved their life incapacity, and they say in russia we see our support, what russia sees in them, but the soviet states are also guided by such a decision. it's all uh, interconnected questions. and they do very well to use only one type of foreign ministry. a lot, but i say again, this is not only a task. mida this is a big political issue. you were talking about education. vitaly comrade started with this, and there are a lot of countries tied to education. uh, let's say there are relations in the same angola, the military one is here, but almost everyone has already retired, but nevertheless, those who remember how they studied in soviet military academies are still studying, but this process needs to be stepped up. it's not only military, if we will compare the soviet military-technical educational presence in the countries of the same africa and the middle east with the current one is heaven and earth. still, russian education, despite all the criticism that

is heard here. she retains a high level of influence and a soviet diploma is a russian diploma. he still has authority over this. that is, these countries need to be tied to themselves in a good way without the revolution, and due to these educational cultural ties, the same thing, as you remember, invited directors to shoot the same films together. here we are we say it didn't work. there is a documentary on the syrian conflict, and a joint russian-syrian project of the film industry. it exists, but maybe damascus is not up to it. but it is important for future generations , no less important than the supply of military equipment to military advisers already prigozhin removed. yes, what's an option? a and. uh, these changes they are not revolutionary they actually dictate. life itself. they are obviously what he was talking about, and dmitry is a positive soviet experience, which is confirmed by our opponents or

opponent. they use this practice . by the way, it has always been used in uh from britain. take the film. our man in the harbor, yes, or roman famous there where does it begin the whole world is divided into regions. each region has its own responsibility , a diplomat, a military special service officer, and this system needs to be revived, then they will understand that this is serious. because in all seriousness it is not just an ideology in the form of a slogan or a word in all seriousness this institutions are institutions that are created not only within russia but also on the international arya mentioned, inter-rights commission, because i had the feeling that there is nothing. no, of course there is. just what i'm leading to, but then we understand well. yes, in the ninety-first year, the central committee of the cpsu somehow disappeared, that is, the presidential administration that replaced it has much fewer staff and powers, and here, of course, the question is just about returning, something that we talked about with dmitry many times the return of state sovereignty.

if you like, which, among other things, is embodied in the reproduction of a new type of management institute that corresponds to the tasks which must face our country. this is a transformation. that is, we live in the model of state structure proposed to us, which no longer corresponds to the images of the tasks that our

country faces. the most important as far as the one with whom you speak in another country, as far as he is blik to the first person who makes the decision. who's on the road. in short, everyone needs to talk. and so sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. nikita sergeevich of the cuban crisis has never met with the chairman, how can you imagine such a thing? not a single meeting, it just did not ask. so, uh, it all depends on how seriously every country on every continent in the soviet union took africa serious results in the face until today, which russia has reaped to extend that

period of the patrice institute . there was a continuation. they burned the crown again , he once again, where did he burn him in front of russia and what did he say? this tells ramzan kadyrov listen to me, i 'm warning you. this ended for me. after a couple of days, what burned? hebrew bible

israeli flag same people everything else so what? this is freedom of speech. this is their hypocrisy. damn is he a complete fool or an incorrigible fool? that's what he conveyed through egypt. he will pronounce back to what it was in february and everything will be fine. cudgel and before that place until that time in

february of last year, everything was fine. why are you offering to come back? do you not understand, or do you think that all idiots will believe you? professional comrade, he's right understands. and he speaks clearly. everything is just beginning russia will fight. for the return of the situation to the one that, in her

opinion, provides security, and we must be ready for this. and ukraine how it ends, when it ends , no steering wheel plays. this is a technical detail. we must be ready for a serious war with russia because russia will not refuse, and he understands correctly. here is the first time someone in the west. correctly explained what they heard from russia

. otherwise, we will not be able to negotiate with her. and they are right about that too. what else they'll have to consider with interest to reckon with the interests of russia allowed, well, for simplicity, well, viking well, it works. here's a schematic. he does not understand with his brains from a democratic country.

think only representatives. and who agrees with him? micron well, two days ago he said. there is no problem that cannot be bypassed. no, just such is their psychology. such is their measure of the hypocrites and it doesn't matter this scandinavia this france it doesn't matter from great britain. this is western european civilization. everything can be circumvented, any law can be circumvented. and we