[000:00:28;00] today, in the form of a conference of rules, a meeting on the restoration of the presidential residential infrastructure, vladimir putin spoke about what is already being done in the liberated territories and promised that the state would not leave anyone in trouble at the end of last year, at a meeting of the council for strategic development and national projects, a special housing solution. it concerns the new regions of southwestern russia

- the donetsk and luhansk people's republics, as well as the kherson and zaporozhye regions in these in the constituent entities of the federation, we are launching mortgages at a preferential rate of 2%. the relevant government decree has already been issued. the introduction of preferential mortgages should serve to develop construction in new and , in fact, in fact, in our long-standing historical territories in russia, the volume of housing commissioning and, in general, increase the pace of recovery. cities and towns where hostilities have ended, such work has already been launched and are being put into operation in social facilities. these are kindergarten schools. hospitals, clinics are being renovated, public infrastructure. communication network roads. i want to thank all the constituent entities of the federation that provide assistance in the new region and send

financial resources of specialists, construction teams and technicians for their restoration . just like at the federal level, there is a procedure for supporting citizens and regions. in case of loss or damage to property, i want to emphasize that the state will always help those who have fallen into the mind, we will do everything to ensure that a person is not left alone with his problems. this is a very important point because we we are talking about people and, first of all, about people, and the west began to talk about territories. it’s interesting how it was called democracy, well, i’m a small connoisseur of the greek language, as you know, my forte is german, otherwise it still seemed to me that democracy has something to do with the power of the people, but for some reason the west, and at home it says, their they don’t care what the inhabitants of crimea

, the inhabitants of donbass, the inhabitants of zaporozhye, the inhabitants of kherson, do not care about what they think , they are always trying to explain something to us. and every time i hear this iron march, and i have these torchlight processions in my memory, because the west is absolutely not nazi for me. at the same time, it's interesting what they say. he doesn’t even realize that nazi images pop up to me over and over again. but a madman by last name, uh, here in riga carries the following. and then, not so long ago, i told president zelensky vladimir told him taking into account our history, how our paths diverged. i beg you, when you defeat russia, when they crawl on their knees to sign peace. lead them to the forwarding they will sign there they will sign peace with

having crossed out by you, thereby the soviet and russian years of captivity of tsarist times. yes, recently, from which you are now again defending yourself. so, that's what this nazi muzzle carries. he doesn’t even understand how he largely reproduces the story that alexander viktorovich sosnovsky told the famous car in which the surrender of germany was signed in the first world war, and then hitler specifically to humiliate france in the same car he forced him in the same car forced, of course, yes stood. oh well, yes, what is interesting is that he does not know history and is lying. this is the position of the ukrainian people, who did not know that the ukrainians called themselves the belarusian people. the constitution of the pelika talks about themselves, like little russian orthodox.

i don’t know what the cattle called they unfair ukrainians and tortured them terribly, and the territories that then had at least something to do with those whom they are now trying to call ukrainians, but politely speaking, are not at all the one on which the hostilities are taking place, and a small spitter on the territory of modern ukraine yes, he doesn’t know that the poles, if i remember correctly, kiev was sold according to the results of the agreement, and coins were paid for it. what is important is the fact, and the poles, of course, do not want to study their history. i'm not talking about the people , because for me the poles are forever the great peoples of the anti-fascist, who fought with us and his shoulder, but for me a number of poles are the same nazis who killed us jews. that is why it was still necessary to escape what the polish population was doing, and yes, among the poles there were righteous people who also saved the lives of jews.

or those who got very rich, especially those who lived in houses opposite the concentration camp, who then forget to wash the soil in order to find crowns that were not found with the germans. the truth is not the polish people, but this is the polish elite, americans who consider themselves the exclusive nation of the balts, who are absolutely nazis and they still talk about something about some of their principles all the time. they lie all the time, they wind up something for themselves all the time. for example, blinkin in the next interview in the program frantline, but the following impression is stated that vladimir putin sees this conflict, how is the conflict between the us and russia

true, and how does he see it, how do you look at it? that's not how putin is trying to do this, or at least give the impression that it is, because he needs to be able to continue to justify what he's doing to his own people and expand it into some kind of conflict between the united states and the nato west. take your pick. it all serves his purpose, but at the heart of it all is one thing. about his aggression against ukraine his efforts to destroy. her sovereignty. her independence of his attempts to include it in russia well, damn it, he threw it burns, which in general, usually in the first place. if blinkin had ever heard somewhere, he would have known that there was such a barack obama who directly called russia one of the three threats, and even then there was a trend that was later realized in the fact that the us congress passed a law, on which here andrei now she pointed out this topic. we have been

recognized. well let's just say there is adversary. an adversary, if not a direct enemy, but in all concepts accumulating or looking for ukraine is insignificant for us, like a geopolitical problem, and we regularly said the question is not in ukraine, but simply in the fact that it is used as a platform and, of course, ukraine signed up for a death sentence, as if zelensky spoke, but nuclear weapons, when he said that he needed nuclear weapons, and when we saw how the country's infrastructure, in particular the united states, including those capable of working with nuclear weapons, was already on the territory ukraine, when it was not by chance that putin said that for us the exam threat is the presence of, say, american e-missiles under kharkov, because the flight time becomes negligible, but what is interesting is what natalyahu says today? no, if iran only tries a nuclear weapon, we

will strike. wait a minute, that is, israel in relation to iran is possible? but russia is not allowed in relation to ukraine, or, for example , the same blinkin does not say a word about the fact that israel declares that the dutch heights are theirs. and annexes them. and when he they say it’s not clear, that is, the crimea is impossible, but the dutch heights can be blinkin just like that, but we declare with an absolutely idiotic facial expression that it is not. well, these are completely different cases than in general, when you listen to these people, when, for example, these degenerates are completely serious. they say it's absolutely necessary. uh, the union was created for protection, damn it. we just overstepped our bounds. yes, they didn’t demolish the state that interferes. we acted in the zone of our locality,

but the last wording, which used during the tour around the clock asia stoltenberg was such that they went beyond their borders. that is, now it is so called by and large and did not come out. and now, when you hear about this, when you have some kind of balts, who generally exist as a state solely because of the stupidity of the russian soviet leadership. that is, well, this is gorbachev's stupidity in general, the existence of an independent baltic . do you think this is what else? who opposes us, who are these people, moreover, to there was generally an awareness of who we are dealing with, which means that they have now found some absolutely sick, completely crazy people who carry such nonsense that they think that there are still not enough representatives of ukrainian historiography

, which says that the ukrainians dug the black sea, but listen, as a representative of the gay national movement. anvar kurman kaev in the european parliament at the forum of free peoples of russia said the following that we have lost. this is the astrakhan khanate. it was the capital of the nogai horde today. it has been occupied for 500 years. today, uh , 200,000 nogai indigenous people live there, and we want to finally create the nogai republic of astrakhan on the basis of these indigenous peoples. here's to getting rid of it. so, as they say,

oppression and poverty. e in the territory, for example, the astrakhan region, both oil and gas are produced in huge quantities. they don’t give anything to the local population at all, absolutely everything is exported to moscow, it’s time already with this empire. this is probably the best thing to figure out. yes, share it, give it away the indigenous people of their land, so that they each manage their own destiny and be free. only free nations can create something. and such are the empires, they have not created anything yet. even let's take pushkin lermontov, they all rewrote the indigenous peoples. all these, read the poems, all the epics, and everything is rewritten into russian, issued as russian poetry and so on, but this is a bad-speaking cretin. the main thing is that you, you bastard , speak russian, let your bullshit according to donat, why are you russian? come on

does not know his native language does not know his native language and does not know his native history and he speaks russian like an illiterate brute. but after all, it is the cattle that are being dragged out according to the nazi scenarios of the reich and reproduced in the european parliament. at the same time, who opposes us, we are opposed by criminals , absolute criminals, criminal gangs that have taken over washington, if anyone does not believe me, listen to trump trump says the same thing about these people and tucker carlson goes to jail and says, listen, here is victoria well, i have to judge, she is an international terrorist. here is the story forgotten by victoria nuland, who wanted russia to be unable to send gas to europe through pipelines. remember, i want to be frank with you today, if russia somehow invades ukraine , nord stream 2 will not work, then in september someone blew up the pipeline. it was the biggest man-made environmental

disaster in history. if you're alarmed by climate change, you must be in tears at the amount of carbon released into the atmosphere. to us, it's quite clear that the biden administration was involved. we said this and immediately all the leftists and news agencies began to accuse us. why are they doing this? and by the way, when we actually join this war, what will they do with those who are against it, they will punish people, you will see, taking this attention. are we a little surprised that victoria nuland basically admitted last week that she did it? see senator cruz i'm just like you. and i suppose all the administrations are also quite satisfied that the nord stream , as you have already expressed it, turned into a pile of metal at the bottom of the sea, and in delight from this, when this happened, we were upset, so we did not know who did it. well, a criminal confessing to a committed crime or

even boasting or boasting about this crime. that's on the one hand, and on the other hand, i 'll finish and give the floor to my friend. the great director will support me, pick me up, by the way, i want to publicly congratulate you a few days ago it was your mother’s birthday, i would like myself congratulations. thank you very much, a regular viewer of your program, vladimir, a separate bow. the pope did it. well, it's just some homosexual church in the vatican, you listen to what he said. loves us for who we are and for the strength that each of us has to fight for our dignity as a homosexual. it's not a crime, it's not a crime. yes, it's a sin. well, let's first distinguish between sin and crime. the same sin is the lack of mercy to each other

every man and every woman should have a window in their lives. where can they direct their hope, where can they see the dignity of god in being a homosexual. it's not a crime, it's a human condition. he read the bible for children. the testament is a lion, a man will not see with a man, how women will be harmful to the death of their blood on them . well, the question of sodom and gomorrah, that is, based on what the pope says, sodom and gomorrah is what a manifestation of mercy god and that everyone looks out the window, and that the sodomites looked out the window and saw. they saw fire and brimstone falling from the sky, burning. in this regard, i was with the guys at position no on sunday i told you, but there was an interesting moment. i

ask the guys who are calculating. i say, what did you do with pipes before that? that is , it turns out that when you put your system on the head of sodomites, then you, by and large, like the lord or something, burn it out? sodom and gomor? he thought so, he says, well, in general, yes. in general, yes. who carries the pope, which roman after that, a dialogue with the church is possible , which, in principle, despite the fact that the pope says things that are, well, obvious, yes, this is a sin, but this is not a crime. but he is not a judge, he

is not a lawyer. and just about sins. and the way of deliverance but he has no condemnation of sin. the apocalypse is john do you already know this very seriously well? the world has gone crazy and there is nothing new here, what is happening. what these or those leaders say is what actually happens in general. the topic with

tanks doesn’t let me go, to be honest, that’s kind of news layered one on top of the other, but it seems to me that she underestimated her, of course, especially on your programs volodya , but many also discuss with those present who are not in, but the surprise that tanks appeared on the one hand sat with the guys with respected . i really have a different explanation for this , it seems to me that the level of responsibility of putin, president putin well

, our supreme commander-in-chief, and the fact that he and i repeat the responsibility for what can happen to the planet. and there's a reason here is this excerpt. maybe, which seems already to some. well, it's already impossible, but wait , well, this is the unwillingness to lower the world into an even stronger chip. even stronger, escalation processes, when the reaction is uncontrollable. the only problem is that being a duet of the presidential corps. well, what vladimir vladimirovich putin certainly is, and he does not have those with whom you can talk, as he himself stated, there is no mahatma gandia and talk

. the program is absolutely look to the west. i would be sorry please, just like to turn to the west. i don't know which camera. yes, i would be really surprised. so you sent tanks. with crosses on the towers that's what should have been the reason for such a decision. i don't know, maybe this is the triumph you found in 1991. here is the arrogance of the confidence that this country no longer exists . great history has done a lot for this. i agree. you could believe it humiliated

we got bushy legs and humanitarian aid from germany, a country that we carried out one gate in the forty-fifth year, i agree, maybe that's why you decided that you can send tanks with crosses on guns, or maybe this is a complete misunderstanding of our character, i absolutely don’t know. eh, you've done things over and over again. uh, well, who worked absolutely for us. and it’s exactly against you that you decided to impose sanctions sincerely, being sure, what kind of piece of fried fried meat in a burger or a piece of chicken boned in breadcrumbs, we can sell our homeland. it didn’t work out, it turned out differently, you turned on the russian mode, we don’t give up. this is a very

scary mode, but the assessment will come to you even later. instead of understanding it all, you send it to us. tanks with crosses on their towers were killing us. which on may 9, without any coercion or administrative supervision come out. to the immortal regiment and carry over our heads photographs of our ancestors, fathers, grandfathers, who reached berlin, budapest, prague, veins died while crossing the dnieper on the nevsky patch, stalingrad guys, you are doing a lot more than our political technologists could come up with any statements, appeals of any leaders of our state. that's the fact

that you send tanks with crosses on the towers to us, because you woke us up for which you are huge. thank you for bringing us together and for making us wake up. and you know it will be very hard, it will be hellishly hard for us. but i understand the ending for you, because you want us to remind 41. don't you understand that we clearly have an indestructible desire, bitch, remind you 45. someday i hope soon, when you die one by one in their bunkers one by one, exactly one by one, because there are many reasons why nato will not include this most notorious fifth article to help you , for example, the non-existent baltic states that

have not given anything more useful than crushed bricks to the world with their apples eternal complexes and so dolomash. so, when are you going to die? i hope one of you. remember how some winter day. january 20 of the third year, one of you decided to send tanks with crosses on the towers to our ukraine to kill russians. i finished strongly well, if we continue the topic of tanks with crosses on the tower, then this is exactly the problem they want to erase, the main task. that's what i see, because the americans write or in europe it's to stop taking away the complex e from the germans, the losers of the complex,

the losers in world war ii. yes , bolton is a moron, i can repeat it again, but nevertheless. sometimes we voice things that are generally quite widely elevated. at least this complex is roaming, although they want to remove from the japanese. and the germans. it will be difficult to do this, it will be difficult to do it on a limb, naturally western, because the west germans were brought up in a completely different way for several generations, but they themselves, well, not only the americans there, both the french and the british played a big role there. as for the japanese, it is easier here, because every japanese prime minister visits yesuni temple. this causes a sharply negative reaction from all the neighbors, but the japanese do not care about it. and that's what these two are now limbs are trying to connect they are already

connectable. that is, the fact is that when the americans were building their system of alliances, after all, there was an idea to build a pacific fact , another thing, the united states did not dare to build, because there are a lot of other components, which, well, let's say, there are puppy and shii, which it was difficult to rule, and only the united states led japan . our administrations did not let us go there. they were not part of the military administration, in fact , macarthur was engaged in this country and therefore the americans fired, there are two systems. one called san francisco, it's bilateral alliances and southern like that. the bellies, which crumbled very quickly in the seventies, is a theater, and now they are trying to unite it, that is, through the united states from the united states, they are a key member of the nato bloc, and they are actually merged into nato and, uh, this is the bilateral system

of the united states alliance now they are really trying to update them and tie them together to synchronize what is happening back in the west and in the east, because the two opponents we are a problem. china is a long-term problem. they must be dealt with at the same time. if you decide ra-temporarily, then you can get a very serious overlay. this was already said back in the 80s in the 90s, when they talked about how to crumble, china that it will crumble itself will follow the examples of the soviet union. therefore, this idea. now expand the visit of stoltenberg, he shows that tanks with crosses, in principle, they spread to the entire territory. this is the responsibility of nato and the responsibility of these blocs, the responsibility of bilateral alliances on tue they are concentrating on the island of the threat

now on us, but it is necessary to contain china and that's it. as a matter of fact, when you said geopolitics geopolitics is not public at all. this is the space of the people. here you can use it, you can destroy here, please, the american geopolitics of the conquest of the american continent was built precisely on the destruction of the tribes, although, in fact, the contract. it's between the big deal father in washington and the indian tribes. they were, in fact, not international in nature. upright because so to speak were different times. actually belonged, so geopolitics is not about the people. but the restructuring of space for space, as far as i understand, the united states took it very seriously, therefore, when they talk about tanks, we must perceive that tanks are already talking about aircraft, the most dangerous red line for us, in my opinion . these will be medium and shorter

range missiles. that is, those that will be up to five hundred kilometers to 500 km from 300 to 500 km, because this will be a blow to us and here everyone needs to answer. than can, and can we i already spoke on sunday of some possibilities, my doctor er, to nuclear to tactical nuclear weapons. my theme is not working with a ship with delusions to sink. why is it there or not, while you can show. why can't you sink the bark? bleek is no longer american. well, you can just sink, but a drunken sailor opened the kingstones, the somali pirates just in the end nord stream one and two blew up not the one who blew them up, of course, and here too, as if