and not provided. uh, in the future , russia needs to be either dismembered by the west, or somehow, uh, divided in general, and even the term ref-direalization appears on the poles actively talking about it, as usual. uh, what remains of diplomacy, here, uh, in these conditions at all. well, i think we won't be without work. yes, she will not be left without work, she is now in several directions, but, firstly, in the most active way. to promote in the international arena our line of our truth-clarification argument, no one in the west is trying to seriously think about those, but we are there in america in europe , did we make any mistakes, no, here is

february 22, 24, 22. it all started the same way and in the fourteenth year it all started not with the february coup, but with what they call the annexation, crimea i personally spoke , attended the negotiations between the president and merkel and salands with macron. well, how do they say that? no? well, if there was no annexation, everything would be fine, but all this so -called thing happened, because the power. uh, when was she captured? it clearly stated that they must have had the first one. such an instinctive call to cancel. eh, the regional status of the russian language, it wasn’t done then at that time, now they practically approached this, but these were the instincts that characterized this government, and after 2 days they demanded the russians. e, in imitation from the crimea , bandits were sent there. and only

the crimeans reacted to this, but these western western, so the politicians said. no, if not for the annexation, and everything would be fine, fine. in what sense would ukraine simply rule, uh, neo-nazis are those rotten yatseniuks who called those who refused to accept the result of the coup as non-humans. well, zelensky did not go far when he called all those who object to simply reunification with ukraine without any minsk conditions called them individuals. he said that the council to those who live in ukraine feels themselves involved in the russian culture of the russian tradition of russian history. he said, for the sake of the future of your children and grandchildren. get out to russia, someone reacted to this , someone did not see here not only sprouts, and already such a terry color of nazism is no one. e,

and. well, we, of course, paid our diplomacy to all these unacceptable actions of expressing the attention of the relevant bodies of the un and the osce and, of the sad memory of the council of europe, but nowhere did the west lift a finger, to at least threaten its wards with this finger, and they shielded his regime . constantly including, by the way, the osce mission that worked on the ground. e to promote the implementation of the minsk agreements, many employees. now these facts have surfaced and really helped the kiev to the military to plan operations by transmitting data from drones that were to be used exclusively for the purposes of the operation e, the osce special monitoring mission second aspect beyond the truth which we must

bear the fight against fakes, which we are obliged to fight mercilessly, and we have a special section on the website, plus everyday live. we respond to any new frills of those who would like to look for a picture of the real e, and, of course, another direction of ours is diplomatic. working with partners in everything in the world, we are now actively developing the exchange of delegations, and at the level of a minister, at the level of deputies, we travel abroad, to those countries with which we have plans to build up constructive cooperation. delegations come to us. and this work is very important, firstly, because the united

states and uh, all the westerners of which the united states raised under itself by depriving the european union of the last signs of at least some kind of independence, and they are great democrats, as you know, but democracy. they understand how their right to impose their understanding on everyone else democracy as soon as you talk to them about the need for democratic approaches to international issues. they show no enthusiasm. although the statute it is where the word democracy is not mentioned, but maybe it is, because the main principle is mentioned more democratic, which there is nothing, and it is written there that it is based on the sovereign equality of the state of the point and this is the sovereign equality of states, if

someone finds respect this principle in any actions of our western colleagues, uh, i am ready to uh nominate this person for nobel peace prize. and above you will show, what happens if you are democrats, and you expressed your point of view, your opponent expressed his. well, let everyone else, uh, be adults and decide who they are. what score? what kind of position they are more than half inside, but the same thing should have happened with regard to the crisis in ukraine , putin in detail. he explained in the purpose of the reasons the inevitability of our special military operation, and he did it not just suddenly, but after eight long years. yes , even more than 8 years since the munich speech

2007 for many many years explaining to the west that they are steering in the wrong direction and undermining everything that they themselves have pledged to fulfill, including dangers in europe the equal nature of security in europe is unacceptable that any country strengthened its security at the expense of infringing the security of another and a very important point. the inadmissibility of any organization in europe claiming dominance in the military-political field, the inadmissibility of nato doing exactly what to do? it is forbidden? by the way, that's the principle these were recorded back in 1999 , they were confirmed in 2010, but all attempts to force the west to fulfill what the presidents and prime ministers signed ended. e. nothing.

rather, the message that yes, these are political slogans, but only nato can give legal guarantees of security, thereby once again violating everything that can be so, so we explained for a long time, and in the end said, you guys are all heard for what we've been saying for years. now we have made this decision. the west reacted negatively condemned. well developing countries in their majority said we are neutral, but respect their neutrality. the west, without exaggeration , sends signals through its ambassadors. do not accept russian delegations to all countries of asia, africa, latin america, condemn. join the sanctions, well, the vast

majority of countries respect themselves, so even small states. one and a half to two million people in the same africa they say, yes, you'll excuse me, we have plans to cooperate with russia and we host them , we go to them. and for this they are threatened punishment. after all, the americans are from what , uh, famous when they offer you something. and what they want from you, they do not promise to give you something in return, they say, so we will punish you about that. hmm, that's the height. i consider the pinnacle of pragmatism, of course. that's why our diplomacy has something to do, and to constantly explain on a daily basis what is happening to debunk lies, especially the lie that is now. uh, it's about our

refusal to negotiate. i have already mentioned the real facts. and the same stoltenberg, by the way, to say the way to peace is pumping up ukraine. weapons so that she won on the battlefield, in fact, he distributed. uh, by the way, to say the plan is some kind of ten-point peace formula , there, uh, everything that is possible is eclectically heaped up, and the seller and security for some reason, energy security, biological security, then the expulsion of russia abroad in 1991, and the tribunal over russia paying reparations to russia and already the last point of the signing of the peace agreement. well, a very realistic initiative i have. i think vladimir zelensky possesses certain periods of considerable fantasy. so u west now read this work on and, of course, your diplomacy

will do everything to conceived. now, at the end of february, as if timed to coincide with the anniversary of the beginning of the anti-russian sabbath in new york, as well as in new york at other sites, which the west is now actively working on together with the kiev regime. er, lest it er, turned out to be the only event that will attract the attention of the world community. we are preparing too. yes some such reporting on what happened during this year, what was discovered, and this is not only the military biological programs of the united states from which they are trying to disown, lie, as always. and this is not only direct participation in the united states in the explosions of the northern streams, now mrs. nuland, in fact,

has carried out a confession. so there are a lot of things, uh, it is necessary to remember and show what methods the united states achieves its non-gemony, as the united states has long ago, judging by the quotes that i cited, they decided to aim e ukraine to prepare ukraine to nurture the ukrainian regime so that it, under the license of the west, starts a war against the russian federation and how about this war the united states, i am sure that it was planned for a long time to mobilize, first of all, europe the european union, forcing immediately to give all weapons to ukraine now this process in the process of completion. ah, but in the meantime, increasing the production of weapons in the united states in the states and forcing europe, you also have obligations in nato to spend 2% of gdp on

weapons. here you buy it ready product. well, at the same time, there is no economic suppression of europe either, doubts were included in the plans of those who live, e, with the awareness of the exclusivity of their country and the need to do it and leave us sovereign throughout the world. look how just now the macron trash has become. uh, to publicly express concern about the laws that the americans passed to combat inflation, which in fact are aimed at dragging production, and in the united states and such a process is already underway for german industry runs to where there are benefits, these benefits are unambiguous, and discriminatory does not mean it is aimed at undermining european industry. well, yes, this is the exclusivity of this work. and finally, if we talk about the european union as, uh, trying

to play its game, uh, about a couple of weeks ago , the european union signed a declaration with nato where everything that nato and the european union need to do is said so that the americans goals are achieved. this needs to be explained and explained louder, because now it's all happening in europe, but already uh, plans are forgiven plans are already spreading to asia and stoltenberg speaks about this in nato and at the madrid summit last june it was stated that nato has global responsibility and those bloc military-bloc structures that are being created against china and against russia in the asia-pacific region, all sorts of auscuses to attract new members. such great pacific powers are also working there, as great britain and france

are participating in exercises in the south china sea with a clearly provocative anti-chinese a swing. well, and more, so hmm everything now they look very carefully at the forms in which it is exclusively realized, it is realized. e, through e, the desire of all submissions. i also said. to achieve the next unilateral economic benefits, in order to prevent a crisis, a crisis that could become very serious in the us economy due to the exploitation of other presidents mentioned. what are these actions? of course , the colonial traditions continue to live at the expense of others. we still have a lot of questions, so let's uh, in short, well, just here you understand, such a theme that the transformation of ukraine into

anti-russia turned out to be a successful project. well , in the sense that the goals are achieved by which of the countries. hey, maybe go that route too? kyrgyzstan kazakhstan around russia is now eyeing this role uh moldova uh, first of all, because they were able to deliver. eh, quite specific methods. far from being freely democratic at the head of the country , a president who, uh, just wants to join nato. she has romanian citizenship. she is ready to join romania, and in general, she is ready for almost everything and what is parallel with her drive, so pronatorical about the european union.

uh, the west and chisinau refuse to resume work in the five plus two format, where there is chisinau where there is tiraspol, russia and the united states, the osce the un says a lot, this format is already considered by the west unsuitable, because it was needed, but when there were still authorities in chisinau interested in preserving the territorial. integrity and in agreement with transnistria, and when the government came, which is ready solve the transnistrian problem with forces and insist on the expulsion of our peacekeepers from there. and those who protect. uh, ammunition depots in sausages, and then no negotiation formats are needed. you just need to maintain power e will not go into details. but this is one of the countries that the west wants to turn into another anti-russia, it has tried and is trying to do it with regard to georgia. where is

the president? well, i know, uh, salome zurabishvili, who was the minister of foreign affairs in the 45th year and since which, by the way, we developed together with our military agreements on the withdrawal of our two remaining military bases at that time, and they also want an interesting moment, in addition to the agreement. rather, according to the declaration on the withdrawal of our two bases, and it also contained an agreement to create a russian joint anti-terrorist center at one of these former georgian bases, where we will work to eliminate these threats, and most of the military personnel were envisaged from georgia, uh, somewhere 700 from us, uh, much less, in my opinion, 100 officers

and that's it. it was in the package and when the bases were. it was deduced that when we did our part , saakashvili categorically refused to create this center then there were still good times. no one suspected that he would attack south ossetia. but even in that, as it were , peaceful environment, which was characterized by the desire to establish new relations, saakashvili deceived us that time, but there is no doubt that he was also told by his curators. there is no need for any joint centers with the russian federation thank god it does not determine, since the development of the country, more modern functions are performed by the government. i do not want anyone to think that i now want to comment on this by the government, but with positive words about

what she is doing, but i will simply quote the premieres. his ministers, who responded with unprecedented pressure to join the sanctions to open a second front. even there, such terrorism is already being used. they know that we are guiding our national interests. we have we get tourism and energy from trade with russia, and this is in the interests of the georgian state of the georgian people because they would also like to turn georgia into another irritant to return the situation. that's to those saakashvili aggressive times. i have doubts. no. by the way, in order for e here in this region, but still the constructive focus on creation prevails, we are promoting the three plus three e format. south caucasian countries and georgia armenia

azerbaijan and three great neighbor countries russia turkey iran the first such sighting contact took place and we will continue about the central asian states. uh, you know, in principle, uh, we are discussing this quite frankly with our friends, but also through the mead line and through the security services, because it is directly related to the security of the country. and you can see how actively, not one year, but our western colleagues planted. there were attempts to instill e about american and about european about nato, not even government organizations. and well, such structures, as an international development agency, which brought the department. sasha works and is engaged in distribution, that is, the softest power that is used to and periodically becomes not soft hard, yes, and yes, probably.

it is impossible to argue here, but the west wants through these e, soft power tools. uh, well, at least to question the further development of allied friendly relations between us and our neighbors, including some central asian countries, but uh, i don’t see any reason here suspect. and that these attempts of the west meet some serious serious, uh, positive, cause some serious positive reaction. our neighbors, allies , strategic partners see these games. and just yesterday. we had a meeting with the heads of the committees on international affairs of the parliamentary assembly of his dkb, in which they participated in moscow, they held

their own events. and along the line. state duma, i met with them, i can say that, just like at the meetings of the dkb leaders at the meetings of foreign ministers, we see that our friends understand and see well. what goals are the west pursuing in our common space, uh, and want to build additional uh, mechanisms to create additional mechanisms that will ensure the further development of our integration plans, and in such forms, uh, that are not subject to western time, that are protected from illegal influence, but work against russia and where the west is present in the post-soviet space always leads. let's get back, but still, kiev

offers the minsk folder on non-aggression. this and our question and our union state. what is our position here? here you go. here is a union state. here, probably, not so important argument, because belarus russia u we have uh agreements, including a security agreement with many other countries, but what u did, kiev is, of course. shows creativity in a funny way. eh, the leaders of the kiev regime. uh, people are capable of it, eh, because it's not even a two-wheeler. as alexander lukashenko accused the belarusians, they offered to conclude a pact, not an attack. and in that same the moment when the belarusian opposition is fed, armed and, uh, allows it

to go through a military run-in at the front, but against the russian federation a. in particular, through the well-known notorious battalion or boltalin’s, which they openly support , they openly declare that, in general, they are preparing in order to then solve similar problems in belarus itself, such a specific vision of the ukrainian side. buttermilk is not an attack, i spoke about this when alexander grigoryevich received me in minsk. he perfectly sees absolutely meaninglessness such even. well, of course, not just senselessness, but outright provocativeness of such visits.

they mentioned the cst, and many people are wondering whether there is nato, the fifth article. and an attack on one means an attack on all, for everyone we have a similar article in the dcb, but number four. i’ll even quote it, if one of the participating states is subjected to aggression by an armed attack that threatens the security of the stability of territoriality, then this will be considered by the state participants, as aggression against all states parties to this treaty. in the event of the aggression of the participants. all other states. the participants, at the request of this participating state, immediately provide it with assistance, including military assistance with russia well, it says, at the request

of the participant, we are no one with such a request we proceed from the fact that, uh, everything necessary to solve the problem of special military operations to end the war that the west started through the ukrainian regime even after the coup d'état. we have e yes, we see how they are fighting against us. uh, all of nato is here. eh, there is some talk of a spell that we are not fighting, but only expressing, but this is ridiculous all types of weapons that have now been partially transferred, and especially those that have been announced. according to experts, it is impossible for ukrainians to work on these systems. or, having passed some courses, there are monthly two-month

even three months there are systems of specialists who cannot be trained even for observable terms. do they supply, then most likely it will be done together with the settlement in the form of them, they will be temporarily released from the army and issued as mercenaries. by issuing a certificate corresponding to uh, but we will uh solve all the issues ourselves and we did not apply. i won't give an analysis. why didn't we do this, but we don't need it simply. when the csto received a request from the president of kazakhstan in january last year to help stabilize the situation during a period of

violence inspired by attempts to seize state buildings. uh afraid of an accident responded in during the day, when armenia and azerbaijan continue to look for ways to stabilize the situation in the caucasus, the osce is also ready to help the csto, even after there was a surge in violence in september last year. there, on both sides, about 300 people died. and we immediately sent and received the request of armenia , the general old dkb. with uh, a special mission of experts. went to the border and brought back. uh, the deployment plan for the csto mission, and on the parts of armenia that borders on the republic of azerbaijan, and this plan was

ready quite a long time ago, but the armenian side. eh, no matter how much she rushed us, and as a result, she already had a summit in yerevan and we completed the text of the corresponding decision, but, e armenian colleagues, a said that they would need this decision only if it categorically condemned the actions of azerbaijan in general, not everyone was ready to go, and not only because they wanted to shield someone, but they didn’t support someone there. uh, just the history of this whole uh karabakh war, it goes deep into, uh, decades, and when for many, many years, armenia well occupied seven regions around.