this plan was ready quite a long time ago, but the armenian side itself. uh, no matter how much she rushed us, and as a result, she already had a summit in yerevan. and we completed the text of the corresponding decision, but , uh, armenian colleagues, a said that this decision was for them. uh, it will be necessary only if , e, the actions of azerbaijan are categorically condemned in it, in general, not everyone was ready to go, and not only because they wanted to shield someone, but someone there, so not to support, but just history all this is the karabakh war, it goes into the depths, uh decades and when for many, many years, armenia well occupied seven regions around azerbaijan and then, when it means that

russia was already desperate to resolve issues by political means, it offered numerous options that even the previous armenian leadership. well, it didn’t perceive it very positively , wanting to keep those territories that it never claimed, so here , after all, before azerbaijan returned the lands that belong to it now. and when both armenia and azerbaijan, together with the european union, signed documents on readiness to conclude a peace treaty. on the conditions outlined in the almaty declaration of december 1991, but somehow it is already difficult for us.

even decide on further steps, because the almaty declaration says that the border between the new independent state will pass under the administrative borders of the soviet union of the union republics, including, of course , armenia, the armenian ussr and azerbaijan, and the soviet socialist republic, in which the azerbaijani ussr was forced to be in the gorno-karabakh autonomous region. so here, uh, after all, uh, the situation is multilayered and the fact that the kb in this difficult situation prepared, a, a plan for the deployment of a peacekeeping operation. i think it was a very important achievement. this proposal is still on the table. there are our armenian allies , friends, who are still interested in him. it's a mission, maybe within there literally one. not deployed, well, that is, potentially russia retains the ability to turn to countries. e allied countries for

the csto for help. well, in the case it is added there, that the increase in the escalation of aggression against russia says that any country has such a right. i answered. why russia does not use this right. we do not see, and i think that this will not necessarily take place somewhere in the future, because we do not see the need in terms of the equipment of our armed forces. eh, the way they work. uh, there is a special military operation in hmm space. that's when, by the way, to say on the initiative of kazakhstan , it is being developed now and a post has been introduced with the peacekeeping potential. rather, one of most of the deputy secretaries general. this means that we are also responsible for peacekeeping, and there is a peacekeeping

agreement on peacekeeping forces on how they are used now, we, on the proposal of kazakhstan, which we supported, are making an addition to this agreement. uh, because it's up to 1,000 in some first year of the third year, it says that the peacekeeping force is being deployed. well, as agreed and sanctioned by the un security council, this is an excessive demand, because it is quite enough, uh, the request of a legitimate the government of one of the dkb members. as it was in january last year with kazakhstan, therefore, now we are making appropriate clarifications to the peacekeeping e, an agreement on the legal basis for organizing a collective security treaty, which will, of course, increase it, but efficiency, but where we see the need for allied

support - this, of course, is foreign policy coordination, not always and not on every issue all csto countries vote in the same way when an issue affecting the fundamental interests of one or another vtb member is put on the agenda and we also talked about this at the council at the council of the principal states of the csd, which took place in yerevan on the website of the ministers of foreign affairs and foreign policy coordination in the current conditions. yes, it acquires, uh, two of your exes at once, two of your former colleagues, yes, rodoslavsky, this is the former foreign ministers in poland , advocated that russia be told that

it is necessary to finally deal with russia . like on the eve of world war ii everyone and the neighbor behaves. here you can, in general, difficult painful. i would say history and uh, no less painful no less uneasy ambition. ah, which show that the actual elites of a certain part of elite a are still. uh promotes such expansionist plans for triathlon hints at what is now western ukraine permanently. well, uh, russophobia, which i

immediately worked very closely with him as a komsiborsk man . and something he does by accident. his deputies a little more untied, therefore, when he immediately wrote on his twitter after the explosion in the northern streams thank you usa and then the truth was deleted, but confirmation of what he wrote about. now it’s already enough, we cooperated well with him, but then there was a joint commission headed by the minister of foreign affairs, and which included the deputy ministers of most other departments, it was something like a mini interstate consultation was a commission, but historians who wrote.

now it's hard to even imagine everything joint textbooks, in which individual chapters were collective, and where there were no common views, the version of the historical period of ours and the polish version were printed, but it was a dialogue. it was a platform where they constantly communicated and where it was inevitable. well, some kind of additional measure was created, but now it doesn’t exist. here. the fact that fattyga suggested that lev walesa said that russia needs to be somehow there , even the term they come up with wildly colonize, they drag some. unpleasant and little intelligible e representatives e, some nagai peoples, e, claiming to create an independent state in the astrakhan region, in the leningrad region

, some also appeared, but the indigenous people. well, this is, so to speak, the encouragement of certain small peoples, and through the presentation of the picture, it is as if these peoples are discriminated against in the russian federation. although everything is quite the opposite, they can speak their languages ​​and do not live on a reservation, as in the usa and canada where they as it turns out, they were also brutally murdered. here in canada now the whole process has begun in parallel, it says that we are simply too big, just like approximately once, uh, referring to it, they quoted that the russian ones are too large, and then this was refuted. well, maybe she didn't say that, but the fact that there are many people in the usa and in europe who think so. and who speak in one way or another, but send this thought. this is a fact

. it’s a pity, because we say it again, we had an extensive mechanism with poland. uh, connections and so on, but one more thing because. eh, here it is necessary, as walesa said. necessary finally deal with russia during the lifetime of this generation. yes, but what is this if not a demand for a final solution to the russian question, when i quoted e, it means the ideologists of hitler's germany who were engaged in the final solution of the jewish question and said that even now almost all of europe, led by the united states, is being gathered against us and declared with different slogans, but the meaning one finally. here, during the life of the present generation, to solve the russian question. yes, even if not in the gas chambers, but make sure that in russia it stops. uh, existence like a great power and uh, push it to

the backyard destroy its economy. and when unscrupulous politicians began to declare that under such comparisons lavrov insulted the memory of the victims of the holocaust. this means only one thing, that the cap is on fire on the thief. and they don't have any arguments. i did not insult the victims of the holocaust. we always honor these victims and hold special events and invite there all those who, in one way or another , were involved in those historical events, unlike the same poles who, not only this year, but also last year, even before the start of didn't invite us to the event to perform at the liberation event. we just said that the memory of the victims of the holocaust.

does not exempt anyone from today's work. to thanks to this memory and er, for the sake of this memory to prevent new nazi movements. what are we now generally seeing in ukraine in ukraine in estonia in latvia where are neo-nazi sentiments and practices being revived? sergey viktorovich is ahead of the eu females, uh, in early february, well, of course, we are not members of the european union, but nevertheless we are neighbors on the continent, and this agenda, which will be discussed there, is not a matter of indifference to us , whatever you would like. what to do? where we are going? that is, somehow,

probably, well, they are engaged. by self-discipline, in my opinion, everything will have to be decided. and they signed up for cooperation with a declaration of cooperation with nato, where everything that nato needs is said, we will provide, we will provide the territory of countries that are not members of nato if it is necessary to transfer weapons of any kind closer to the russian borders. all this has been said, and scholz recently said that all our security depends only on the united states. well, if the european union will be engaged in, but working out requests to washington, so that washington somehow spares the european economy and industry, and uh, as it were.

generosity, but with regard to those laws of those subsidies that they provide americans to businesses in their territory, who do, uh, the corresponding business europe is simply meaningless and as the french economy mister said for a long time now , the price of electricity for business in europe is four times higher than in the united states, here's the same thing, and the macron said the other day that we will turn to the united states so that they bring in some collectives some gave us discounts. well, they will ask, probably already went to ask, didn’t do anything, yes hmm well, that’s why i’m not very interested in what the eu is discussing there, as i heard zelensky planning to invite, either through tv, or the same

alive. i don’t know, but they will announce this to us later. hmm, they decided to do it a long time ago and have already begun this work to make zelensky e the main dimagrat a symbol of struggle, and against democracy. and this is the same simple, black-and-white picture of the world, which the americans are also promoting here are the democracies themselves, which they convene the second one at the end of march. it will be stated there. what a simple task all democracies have to fight against all autocrats autocrats declared by mei china iran canada air syria venezuela well, in general, this circle of countries, who refuses to submit to the west, er, in his demands. and the americans themselves will appoint the democrats. there is

a rather interesting list to look at those who were invited to the first democratic summit. there are countries there, i don’t want to offend anyone, uh, which the americans themselves have never ranked as democratic states. but nevertheless. so now this is a revolutionary team that convenes the so-called democracy themselves, and, according to our data, strives for the truth on it, and already a project of some kind the solution of developing the philosophy of confrontation between democracy and autocracies and translating it already into a material practical plane , the intention, at least at this stage, according to our information, is that these democracies will form their requirements for autocracy and formulate their own rights. through

the heads of autocratic governments to help the peoples whom these autocratic governments oppress. i'm here even, probably 2 years ago. i wouldn't believe it's being discussed now. everything is there, so to speak. to endow themselves with the same rights that they want to receive, promoting through all sorts of un structures, true or false, in violation of the rules of procedure , the idea of ​​​​creating a tribunal against russia, the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bgetting reparations with russia, all this is a gross violation of international law. well, they are no longer accustomed to somehow the way they click, their fingers abandoned all their principles that they cherished for many decades imposed on everyone as part of the globalization of the inviolability of property from the presumption not to blame. nosti, uh, conscientious

the competition of the market mechanisms was all crossed out when they needed to punish the russian federation for not working. it's a different point, but they resorted to these. the illegal method made everyone wary, and it is no coincidence that now there is talk about the transition of the national currency. who knows from what foot he will wake up, which president of the united states and who will seem unattractive to him in the morning, and the president of brazil, the president of argentina, have already discussed the possibility of creating a bilateral currency of their own, and then they went even further and proposed think of a currency for all latin american caribbean states. the same. uh, lula da silva proposed to discuss within

the framework of the brix, this will no longer be a regional global approach to what to do with currencies in the financial sector in an environment where the united states with its own dollar, but simply violate all thoughts of my decency, the same process has begun saudi arabia is buying sells nevsky we are already bringing the share of national currencies in trade with our key partners to 50% and the process goes further hmm well, if we talk about china relations with china are called upon rather dynamically. we are building, as it were, a new world order from china, but what are the points of contact here, but there may even be risks, because dancing like a giant is always. it is quite dangerous, maybe even to crush many, in general, there are some risks in relations with china in this sense. contact is a very modest

characteristic of our relations already recorded in our declarations, that, despite the fact that we do not create a military union, our relations higher in quality of military alliances in their classical sense, and they have neither restrictions nor limits and there are no forbidden topics, they are really the best in all the years of existence of both the soviet union and the chinese people's republic of the russian federation, and our common interest lies primarily in to let us develop on the basis of our national plans. within the framework of the existing rules of international trade, in particular the rules of the world trade organization, and within the

very system that the west has created since nonsense from the boer institutions of the international monetary fund. the world bank. but when we joined there, there were certain rules that we adopted. we joined the world trade organization for 17 years. and we have adopted these rules, which are basically, well , basically fair competition rules for settling disputes evenly, because china is beating america on its own field by its own rules. and has every right to demand compensation, which he will certainly be awarded by the wto dispute settlement body if the united states allows this body work americans. they simply block

the appointment of new members of this body to existing vacancies. there is no quorum, a purely bureaucratic, in the worst sense of the word, soviet-party approach. and this has been happening for many years. that is why, because china will win all these disputes, and in the united states they started the reform of the world trade organization, they publicly stated that this reform should be based on the interests of the united states and the european union. them to behave, and the same thing to the monetary fund, if take the criteria on which the world bank's international monetary fund is based, now the brix countries have already shouldered for several years. this situation has come can qualify for such a number of shares and,

accordingly, votes. which will disrupt the current situation, when the united states alone can block any decisions. now, if the economic indicators of the brigest countries are objectively reflected in the mechanisms of the monetary fund , the united states will lose its right to block the decision alone, because they will already lack votes and shares. uh, so what if everything was fair. i think so, and we probably would then listen more to those leaders of our economic bloc who still said that you know about globalization. there are positive traits these positive traits. damn more. no. we understood this earlier, because, firstly, we were the first to take the hit.

and due to the fact that the united states was preparing e-e against us through ukraine, and secondly, we were not as deeply immersed in this system as china, at least in terms of trade volumes in terms of e-american securities, which the chinese bought there for one and a half trillion, in my opinion, e, therefore , the depth of chinese immersion in the current system, of course, is not comparable with ours. but the fact that china will inevitably hmm begin to reduce this dependence, and it has already begun. by the way, reduce this dependence. for me, no doubt, uh, there is all the evidence. on this account, and china , it will take longer for him to create parallel instruments that u will not. rather, they will protect

him from the arbitrariness of the united states as the main steward of the global monetary financial trading system at this stage, but on the other hand, mechanisms and instruments that will not do it overnight, because then there can be very serious economic shocks, given the interconnectedness, there will be trillions between the economy and the united states and the economy the chinese economy, but the process of not just discussing, but also searching for ways to form new mechanisms, it has begun and it is moving in the direction. well, we can say the fragmentation of global mechanisms, because that while global e mechanisms are associated with the united states and their satellites. they are

no longer global. they serve one group of states, so when they call on latin america and the caribbean to think about their financial instruments. this is either fragmentation, or i would prefer regionalization to globalization in our region . plans of the shanghai cooperation organization, which along with the agenda dedicated to security. there are very good prospects, transport, logistics and economic. and, of course, against this background , the chinese chinese project one belt one road, and the chinese agreement on cooperation with

the eurasian economic union, which already exists. and now putin has proposed. no 5 ago, think about how not to impose any approaches on any of these structures on the other, but to harmonize plans between these projects between, so that there is no duplication of contradiction there, so that there is no duplication of dissipation of resources. and now such a process has gone on many times already, uh, has. amaranduma cooperation with the osians, the sco has a memorandum with the eurasian economic union, the sco has a memorandum session, too. and this process of harmonization, but these integration aspirations, putin proposed to call the formation of a large eurasian partnership. so there’s more here too, and it was even the fifteenth year at the summit in sochi of russians, that is, even then there was an objective need to look at some alternative to the globalization that, uh, has been imposed on us for many decades

and which, at the very least, it means, seemed to suit everyone. this is also a great eurasian partnership, as a manifestation of the trend towards the regionalization of global processes. well, all the same, here, uh, there are many risks. uh, well, there is a common opinion that china is so big, we are so small , something may change later, and in general, we will face something insurmountable, as far as such fears are also blamed that we are big offend everyone. who are the former soviets around us republics supposedly, therefore, do not meet due respect, well, there will be many such people who want to, and of course, there are already enough people who want to, uh, scare us with china. i see it. well,

the game is related. uh, with the desire not to let us , uh, cooperate and coordinate in any economy. nor in international affairs, this is exactly the same here, we have no doubt that the plans signed between us by the chinese republic are in the interests of both russia and china that these plans do not determine. uh, the role of russia as a certain, subordinate role , they are mutually beneficial. and they are far from china's only energy supplies are space. this nuclear energy is many other high-tech areas, activities like. vaughn to remind you that when

the west declares russia china and in the current main threats to russia, now there is an immediate such threat that needs to be stopped immediately in some way, and china will have to be fought for a long time. well, they probably want china not to help us not militarily, as they are now accusing all over the world, only north korea, iran, or someone else, uh, works. we have the military-industrial complex will be fine, but in the international arena, well, of course, brazen promotion that suits only the united states of their satellites is not to their taste and is unacceptable. they are not chinese to us. we will object to this.