today marks the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the most important and most bloody battles of the great patriotic war , the battle of stalingrad. vladimir putin laid a wreath at the eternal fire of military glory on mamaev kurgan in volgograd. after

that, the president spoke at a gala evening in honor of the victory in the battle of stalingrad. leningradskaya along with the defeat of the largest grouping of the wehrmacht and its satellites , the will of the entire hitler coalition, european vassals and minions of nazi germany were defeated, and a lot of them fought near stalingrad practically representatives of all european countries of conquered europe began to feverishly look for ways to escape, how to evade responsibility, and put all the blame on their former owners. everything has become final. it is clear what the soviet people knew from the beginning. the plans of the nazis to destroy our country, all their ideas of world domination

are doomed to the rights of 200 days near stalingrad , the streets of the legendary city turned into ruins, our army won and won. what turned out to be spirit? beyond human capabilities only by their devotion. putin drew attention to the fact that now the west is trying to attack russia again using the same nazi ideology; now, unfortunately, we see that the ideology of nazism, already in its modern, guise in its modern manifestation , again creates direct threats to the security of our country. again and again we

are forced to repulse the aggression of the collective west. incredibly, the fact is that we are again threatened by german leopard tanks. on board of which the crosses are going to fight with russia on the land of ukraine with their hands. subsequent hitler by the hands of bandera. we know that despite efforts are official in nature. and all over the world, including the american one.

those who count. to win a victory over russia on the battlefield, apparently, does not understand that a modern war with russia will be completely different for them. we do not send our tanks to their borders. but we have something to answer and the use of armored vehicles will not end the matter. everyone should understand this for those who threaten us. apparently for them it is not clear the simple truth and with milk. we created our country.

now in the west they are again shouting that russia needs to be destroyed, split into pieces as much as possible to whittle down . , as in 1941. and those who want to subjugate e wanted to subjugate the uh

world, starting from europe at that time they gathered most of the countries of the continent to start a war against the russian federation i don’t see much difference, moreover, during the great patriotic war of the second world war, and against us was used by nazi ideology. and why do people refuse to see the nazi ideology, which now underlies the e, kiev regime, and all those statements that sound from the outside. his fans and puppeteers, well, i see no way to regard them otherwise as an attempt to finally resolve the russian issue, russia must receive a strategic defeat, and so that it does not rise for a long time, and at sula, a well-known member of the european commission also said that the results war should be the defeat of russia and such

a defeat that it would not be able to become its own economy for ten long decades. this is not, uh, racism, or nazism, or an attempt to resolve the russian issue. yes, not in the gas chambers, for the time being, uh, in germany there are , uh, many decent people who will not allow the revival of fascism. but there are those who would not be against it at all, so we are at the epicenter of a geopolitical battle. here, even, uh, there is no need to doubt this, and those who solve practical problems on the front line. eh they do the most important most important thing they are heroes and uh feats that they perform this and the feats of the war of the future of mankind, and allowing not

to allow. creating conditions for complete hegemony in the united states . yes, you know, when they said some time ago that there was hysteria in the west. and very many of us were happy about this. this did not please at all, because hysteria really began in the west. right now it is beginning to acquire absolutely controlled, but very large-scale forms. but when you have a tantrum, what would you no matter how smart, well-read, and even sorry for the rude russian word intelligent, you lose the ability to rationally evaluate and the world around you and yourself and the enemy. and your own perspective, so the opponent's tantrum is not good. this is bad, and we

clearly see how the west, having entered into spirals of hysteria, has lost the ability to rationally assess the consequences of its actions. yes, we will defeat them. yes, we can remove this force, as we have overcome before, the question is how much blood will have to be shed to do this. how much blood their former population how much is the ukrainian ss from the blood of our people? it's a tantrum. always bad. you know, i always thought i would say the second such thing, you know, it was so fast. and why are they doing something so rude? well, everything could have been different, it could have been strangled. in the arms of another two or three years, we hang noodles about

partnership to imitate something to prolong this unfortunate. sorry er for the rude russian word with nato's founding shares well the massage was an opportunity for us to hang noodles on our ears. yes , even now even this summer was full of these opportunities. well, it was possible to bend the kiev regime so that the kiev regime took an operational pause. no, they go to the end, they go not just to the end what they announced, this is not the destruction of the russian state , the destruction of russian society. the absolute zeroing of russian culture and the culture of other peoples of russia is the destruction of the tissues from which the russian state grows, this is a total war. i don't care. well, why is it so, but they have always been, they have

always been enemies, but you know such smart rational ones, planning for a long time, and i came to one conclusion. and they don’t have time. crisis phenomena in their system of the global economy are such that they need to hurry, you know, i have such an allegory. remember, stolypin said that russia needs 20 years of peace. and they need 20 years of war, they need 20 years of war, until all their partners, enemies, competitors kill each other. no, they sit behind a puddle. it also privatizes the remaining british trading posts of the colonies, but the trading posts remained, this one will be finally finished off as a control one in the head under the british

empire that surfaced at the end of 2010, this hmm predator, so to speak , such a hmm hyena that picked up the americans, various tasty pieces, they need 20 years of war. for this, the war must also be tatal; it should not be a conflict for the sake of rationalistic military , military-political, and even political goals. this should be a war of ideology, a war of values, a war of civilizations, and not in the sense that, as the professor and, in my opinion , the colonels, wrote, he was a retired american army, sam huntington, but in this destruction. they need no difference. in america, between the beginning of the 2000s and the beginning of today, it is energetically simple . america of the 2000s wanted to remain the main one . today's america wants to remain the only beautiful one, and therefore the war of values ​​is a war of symbols, war

and dialogues. everything is done with the expectation of a long war, but at the same time, of course, they are technologically advanced. they are very knowledgeable and work very well. pay attention to how the discussion is now going on, can russia be dismembered? suddenly crawls out hmm, mr. gates who says, well, yes, in principle, it might, it will be very bad, some other people come out on american information platforms and say. yes, it will not be normal. nothing will happen. it won't get worse than this mode. it won't. and if russia is not dismembered, the next regime will be even worse. yes, it is illogical, but such methods work on propaganda, so to speak. here, through

a discussion with a tilt to the impossibility of dismembering russia in western politics in western public opinion is gradually the idea is being introduced that it can be exactly the same as a few months ago. i promote the idea that russia is about to use nuclear weapons. why, how, and we were sitting here and talking guys. well, read the military doctrine, well, look, well, here is our official, but they did not hear anything, because they were solving a different problem. they drummed into their layman that the use of nuclear weapons in this conflict by one country or another. perhaps, and quite possibly, it will be them who will be the first to use this weapon. and this is how overtones open slightly, as it is customary to say from the door to the long dangerous,

and you know to such a conflict for destruction, but there is good news. i think that what the president of the supreme commander-in-chief said and what the foreign ministers said clearly indicates that the vast majority of the russian political power and a significant part of the russian elite, including the business elite. she accepted the idea. that this is a war not for life, but to the death, that this is a war? for the very fact, not just the existence of the state. not easy domini-not just the ability to have some kind of sovereignty, you know, sovereignty has also become an abstract term. here but this is a war for their right. their descendants to be

someone on this earth. and this is this, well, you're very good. from this, this is still a long step from this. until you realize yourself as one with the people. well, as we are the state of the last europeans in russia, it started from there. before the realization that the elite and the people is a single whole, there is still a long way to go. the first step in general, and the whole is. already done, but the road will master, going interesting, of course, you can for us put. here is the fragment again, just here is this separate fragment, where vladimir vladimirovich says that you are sending tanks to our borders. you just please, and you can highlight it, because it seems to me that this is semantic than important. this is just, accordingly, a

lot of questions. i think that the west is now simply analyzing every word to understand what putin means and he is very specific. and of course, you can see how it is for putin. probably, this is some kind of understanding that putin is a germanist. that is, he a lawyer, but he is a specialist in germany and worked in germany and everything and the mentality, he knows german perfectly for him. i think that this is the level of the deepest personal disappointments and german politicians what has just happened. that's for sure, that is, this is a disappointment of the type, well , and schultz, in my opinion, by the way, this is good, the street already understands, that's why you've gone. this is such a confusion of feelings that you understand that he made a mistake that could cost

not only her future in germany, but is unknown. how will this road end? be, by the way, the question in general about the existence of germany in the form in which it is present now. you know, let's listen again to vladimir vladimirovich, we are again threatened by german leopard tanks. on board of which the crosses are again going to fight with russia on the land of ukraine with their hands, followed by the nazis of bandera. we know that despite the efforts of the official corrupt at its core. we have many friends all over the world, including on the american continent in europe, european countries, including

including germany those who count. to win a victory over russia on the battlefield, apparently, they do not understand that modern wars with russia will be completely different for them. we do not send our tanks to their borders. but we have something to answer, and the use of armored vehicles will not end, mind you, we are not talking about ukraine, but we are not talking about ukraine, it will not be only the ukrainian theater of war . this is a very serious statement.

and we will answer them there and in a completely different way. sergey, well, whether they hear it or not. let's see as long as they heard, yes it is first and second. so to speak, we designate these red lines. not for the first time, as it were , yes, well, unfortunately, including giving the opportunity to go where the reddest line will be, it’s not very understandable. i think we spoiled them. i have spoken about this more than once, yes, well, including, for example, these uncontrolled visits of various, so to speak , incomprehensible politicians to ukraine, which really make a show out of this, we are not doing anything about this. we are waiting for them to see the light or appreciate. nobody is nothing will appreciate, the quality of people is no longer the quality of people, not like, but to compare. this, uh, with the past years, even with the past centuries , it’s senseless that a lot has changed and not for the better in general world politics, yes , world mass culture and so on, but, frankly, i didn’t want to talk about that, but about 80 years of e battles uh near stalingrad e. this is

really, the decisive battle is really the turning point, and uh, in my opinion. it has a lot of different meanings. i have highlighted a few. why is it necessary to remember this? why say so? should we talk about it? and by the way, in my opinion, it would be possible to release, uh, a series of feature films by the 80th anniversary, or at least one, this is really a turning point, so to speak, but about the battle of stalingrad. in fact , not many films were shot even in soviet cinema, but the best they fought for the motherland yes, but actually there are not so many of them. it's a really epic battle though, and really a watershed. yes, it would be possible for the 80th anniversary. i believe put before our cultural figures. uh, well, some kind of task in order to cover this, but it's not too late even now, but nevertheless the first. why should we remember this? yes, today and always. eh, this is really an example. eh, so to speak, incredible without an exemplary feat of our people. near stalingrad

, in my opinion, it has no analogues in history. eh, it was so grandiose that this feat is possible only with this one battle and only with these feats. you can inspire a generation there, decades there. if right, of course it is to serve. and if, uh, it means to ensure that people remember this, so we need to take examples from there. eh, this is the first . the second thing is also important, who is on which side. today, as then 80 years ago, we are on the side of the battle against nazism. we are fighting nazism, where now everyone who once recognized, er, the historical role of the battle of stalingrad, the americans, the british and those who were part of the anti-gel colony, where they are, they are for nazism. whoever has, in principle, we have, and let me remind you that then, in my opinion, george the fifth yes, there was a king great britain won a special sword. yes, and they gave it, as if the defenders of stalingrad were brought to the soviet union in a solemn ceremony, that is, recognition of the feat of the soviet army council. what kind of people and recognition of significance, if the battle of leningrad

was unambiguous? where are these people now, does this mean that there are no principles? we have them when they say, here are the principles, here are free measures, etc. we have these principles. they are the same in this respect as they had these principles 80 years ago. no they on the other hand, as it were, yes, it is necessary to support nazism, when it was necessary, then they supported it. they will support her principles now. no, there are only interests. and they are absolutely cynical. yes, and uh , there is no need to talk about ideals and values ​​here. the third thing is in my opinion. it is also important, by the way, yes, we are now talking a lot about the fact that the serious situation is something to say, not everything. so good to us. i would like a rather difficult situation, here and there and myself, and so on and so forth, but still i remain with my thought that that russia is eternal and no russian question. no one will ever decide, whatever it was on the great patriotic war. uh, the germans reached the volga for a short period, but they came ashore . volga is still the way it was. they stood near moscow there, looking into the wine, as if, yes, they took these very ones, so to speak, to the kremlin, in a blockade ring. leningrad,

however. we won, we won and we will win again . i am absolutely sure of it. it's like, yes, it sounds pathetic, but it's important to understand, for those who also like to talk about the fact that here, well now, if now that's not the case, then a disaster, if now it's not like that, then everything is gone. if we don't exist now, we will be more than once in our history. we proved it, of course, the issue of price is important here. this is clear. it's important here. how how at what cost, however. it seems to me that it is important, among other things, to know history in general. uh, how to study history to increase the hours of teaching, so to speak, and compare the general general context. now this is one of the primary tasks for educating our generations. once again, i repeat that the number of hours of study of the history of e, the great patriotic war. it's just scandalously scandalous. so to speak, small. yes, very small. in our school, not in the ukrainian school , not in the polish, not in the american, but in our school. here in the russian, we all make claims, so to speak, if the youth. why don't you know anything here? and how should they know something if, for example, four

stories about him were replaced, so to speak, with social science, where they are taught. how to take out loans? how to budget? how means go to the bank, as soon as everything is where the interest is, and so on. this is what they know about. if you taught them that, as it were, the meaning of life is where to go to relax. and how to have fun that's about it. they know, in fact, they don’t know exactly what they were taught and there’s no need to, as it were, yes, so to speak, say that they are so stupid and, uh, everything that is connected with this is another one. uh, so this drawing is extremely important right now, one more important thing. yes, uh, i think it is necessary, in general, how to say our whole concept of approach to our history to a large extent to revise. why i will explain with all the pathos with which we talk about the experience of the great patriotic war, there is here. uh, so, uh, a problem is a problem. that's what they've been teaching for decades, that we repelled, that means heroically, the invasion of the occupiers and only such a war, as it were, an aggressor. yes, that's just such a war meets the true interest of the country. and this is not

so. this is not so, in fact, this one , so to speak, paphos to you to a large extent. well to a certain extent plays evil with us joke, because when people say now, well, we invaded ukraine. well, it is independent, so this war is somehow wrong and more, moreover, in ukraine with all their anti-sovietism. they play this theme too. yeah, i think we're a little bit caught in a trap. i understand that this sounds dissonant. we've kind of fallen into the trap of slightly overheating one part of the story, so to speak, and completely missing the other part when we're talking. but look, the americans do it. but look, there the french did the british did so. yes, it works, it works, but still they are kind of bad. we seem to be good and he will remind. that's what, in fact, for the sake of ensuring its national interests and security, russia waged a large number of completely non-defensive wars, of course , for example, such a great general alexander, he generally boar warriors had almost nothing to do with all his campaigns. generally never defenders, however.

this is a great commander who ensured the interests of russia in that era very seriously and in fact, when russia was in danger, when it was in the national interest. she fought all sorts of wars. she had a historical right to this, and we have such a historical right even now, in my personal opinion. it is important to convey this position, based on historical facts, otherwise we will always be circling in this one, too. in this one, so to speak. yes, e.g. funnels that, on the one hand, they themselves created, and on the other hand, how to impose it on us. well, you actually recognized the independence of ukraine. and now here tra-ta-ta-ta from this there is a part of the truth. i think it is very important to reconsider the views on these things in general, but let's start there with some kind of expert discussions about this, so to speak. for some reason, there is one more position, which is also extremely important. it is connected with the collapse of the soviet union well, we won’t get around this thing, you understand, after the collapse of the soviet union, the new authorities of russia recognized it de facto, and somewhere, yes, the yura of independence, i understand, what

are the risks here, yes, there are e, as it were, the attitude of other soviet states . well i think if you link it to security issues, that's where our national interest is. this danger is threatening. there, in fact, the fact of recognizing the collapse of the soviet union is inappropriate and inappropriate. here are these serious conceptual things about studying one's own history, permutations and accents, and about all the same assessing what happened in the end in the ninety- first year. and how can we continue with this. how should we treat this? it seems to me that we need to work hard so that for many uh, situations like this one wouldn't come as such a total surprise, you know, because yes. we are talking about the fact that, well, the vast majority of people, so to speak, it supports understands and so on, but, nevertheless, there is a significant part of people who do not understand, they understand on the one hand. you can blame them for this, on the other hand they do not understand that 30 years. they have heard something completely different for 30 years. they heard from 10 of the local from the russian media. there is a completely different

new independent states. here the disintegration of the soviet union was not avoided. well, although, although, in my opinion, there, well, you can talk about it endlessly throw, but nonetheless. we recognize this matter, we are predictable partners. tra-ta-ta international law international law international law and so on and so forth and so forth, in my opinion. we are moving into a completely different era. and now, uh, actually americans. this is great too. this is well understood, all the next epoch that is approaching, most likely, firstly, it will definitely be the decline of democracy. it has already begun in this sense the americans. they don't like to emphasize this thing, but they lose. here in my opinion. yes, here, here, maybe we can say so on a specific ukrainian theater of war , there may be different movements, but in general they lose. why i will explain, look a year has passed, first a special operation. no one except the american pantu joined them for a whole year, they twist their arms, which means they promise something, what do you threaten, but in the third world the so-called there, relatively speaking, asia africa latin

america no one for a year has not lined up in shorts on the windowsill. they didn’t line up . all this, but this is a failure. that is why they are consolidating the west with all the means they have, because they feel that the era is leaving the era is leaving with it. this whole cult-democracy, and but i have to tell them, and uh, the next one will go along with the cult of international law. he will leave all he will not be, because this is how it is interpreted, how it is applied, it becomes less and less, unclear. and as for the political structure, i repeat once again. here, i once said, in your opinion, there is an era of the most diverse alliances and the most incredible, most exotic structures from the point of view of the political system, therefore historical creativity is appropriate here, and it is based correctly, as putin said on knowledge of history. only knowledge can be different; it must be objective. it seems to me that it does not make sense to have these very ones alone, so to speak, pieces, history. here are the operations on them. and others. well there, either it was, or it wasn’t, it was there, and sometimes very successfully, and it seems to me that this