feel free to ask, you've been waiting. first the most exciting political program. what happened in volgograd, our strength in pravda, when russia is accused of starting a war? you need a pill to remember exactly 20 years of american invasions, an endless series of military conflicts, deception

of the whole world, murder of political leaders. good evening february 2nd. vladimir putin arrived in volgograd to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the victory in the battle of stalingrad, in those days, thanks to the courage of the city’s defenders, a radical turning point in the war, the enemy was stopped. and who would have thought that decades later , german tankers, with crosses on board , would again prepare to fight russia on the soil of ukraine, the president spoke about this when speaking at a solemn event in honor of the victory and warned. we have something to answer and the use of armored vehicles will not end the matter. everyone should understand this, good evening, but we

asked the veterans of the battle of stalingrad what they think about german tanks in ukraine , these are, of course, the most important and authoritative comments. this battle was not just a battle for the city. the matter is the very existence of a tormented, but not conquered country. stalingrad forever, has become a symbol of the indestructibility of our people, some additional questions.

thanks, it seems to have already left, when suddenly they made a sharp turn in the war zone in the donbass eh torture road steppe burion on the day of the eightieth anniversary of the defeat of the nazis the battle of stalingrad was a grandiose heroic victory in every sense of the word, all of russia remembers the heroes of the great

patriotic war. and of course supports those heroes who defend the country today is incredible, incredible but the fact is that we are again threatened by german leopard tanks, on board , who are going to fight with russia over russia, victory on the battlefield, apparently does not understand that modern wars with russia will be completely different for them. we

do not send our tanks to their borders, but we have something to answer and the use of armored vehicles will not end the matter. everyone should understand this, the veteran’s short, capacious answer to the question about german tanks must be beaten. they've sold everything now. americans together are the people of nothing. do not rise, a significant part of the german people, of course, i remember what more recently the german chancellor said and wrote and their leaders noted that stalingrad became a symbol of the immeasurable suffering endured by millions of citizens as a result of the attack of national socialist germany on the soviet union, what happened in stalingrad remains in the collective the memory of our peoples, along with the defeat of the largest grouping of the wehrmocht and its satellites , the will of the entire hitlerite coalition was defeated, european vassals and henchmen of nazi germany, and at stalingrad they fought a lot

of practically representatives of all european countries of conquered europe began to feverishly look for ways to escape, how to escape responsibility, and shift all the blame on their former masters. russia is a big country and someone always fought with this country without ceasing, and some said how boring life in the world, when no one is with russia, is not a joke. this is a statement of specific politicians of the past and western countries that has always been so, and now again, tanks are coming against russia, and on the eve of washington announced the supply of long-range missiles to kiev. here are long-range missiles, then you need it. yes, but if they are, they will be supplied from this, we will draw the appropriate conclusions and use our means of destruction, hmm, which we have enough to strike such a blow on topics that we have not yet dealt,

are we not approaching some very dangerous critical devil, how to retreat from it? who and what should we do for this? this is from 2014. we we have always strived to ensure that all disputes that arise are resolved by peaceful means through negotiations, but, unfortunately, the other side was on the other side. set up differently. uh, they began to carry out tough military operations there. one way or another, we were forced to stand up for the people who live in these territories. it started with this, but we didn’t arrange a state transfer in ukraine. they started, in fact, everything is based on the policy of our geopolitical opponents aimed at pulling russia apart historical russia is not divided by the authorities have always tried to do all this. uh, trying to do it now. and you know that this goal is different in uniting the russian people for

those who threaten us, apparently. for them , the simple truth is incomprehensible, all of our people we all grew up and, with mother's milk, absorbed the traditions of our people, the generation of winners who, with their work, sweat and blood. they created our country and handed it over to us as a legacy , the steadfastness of the defenders of stalingrad for the russian army is the most important for all of us moral guideline. and our soldiers and officers are faithful to them. the continuity of generations. the values ​​of tradition. all this is what distinguishes russia. it makes us strong and self-confident in our rightness. and in our victory in the granite of mamayev kurgan , piercing words are carved on the century. did people go on the attack, are they mortal? heroes are alive when

they are remembered. the nazis inflict heavy losses on the enemy in one area. the red army soldiers and senior sergeant filatov defended the flank of their unit . thrice rushed to the attack, but rolled back each time. for the fourth time, the germans launched an attack, a company of bakers , an unequal battle was divided for more than three hours, but the nazis could not defeat nine of our fighters on the battlefield. there are 60 bits left filatov ivan evgenievich we have sits, yes, the eighth table i don't know. and you, in the forty-second year

, heard it, saw it, read it to the side, you also saw it. yes? i heard the second time to hear. we will treat ourselves , we will treat our history with respect and love for our motherland, our language and our culture of its historical memory, russia will always be invincible. russians know the history of the great patriotic war from the stories of their families, and in an era when everything is purposefully turned upside down, this knowledge is power. our strength. truth is authenticity. this is our most important weapon exactly 20 years ago , us secretary of state colin paul was speaking at the

security council. he confidently lied about the fact that iraq was creating biological weapons , showing a test tube with white powder as evidence, and under this fabricated pretext already in march. 2003, americans. no sanctions. invasion. also without sanctions for 4 years. prior to that, nato began bombing. yugoslavia was still syria libya afghanistan the day of the invasion of iraq vladimir putin issued a statement in which he warned that the change of international law to fisted sooner or later will lead to global instability. and so it happened. in fact , exactly 20 years have passed since the romantic hopes and dreams collapsed that after the end of the cold war, no other warriors in world impossible even today, it is all the more important to look at who and how then tried to save the world from confrontation. this is a big political mistake. how many times the united states has been the initiator of armed conflicts, went to

cancer, hanged saddam hussein one of the goals to control, the oil reserves of this country worries me. the ferocity with which in recent years they have made decisions on the use of force and international affairs, what do they want? this is what they do on the t-shirt of your colleague, who is standing in front of me with a portrait of che guevara look how handsome he looks. this is the brightest representative of the theory of export of the socialist revolution. we are not going to be engaged in the export of the capitalist democratic revolution , if we only allow ourselves to do this, the world will embark on a very dangerous slippery path, an endless series of military conflicts. putin's warning about where the world is in danger of going today is exactly 20 years since the meeting of the un security council that changed the course of modern history is less than

a teaspoon of anthrax spores that's the number it took to shut down the us senate in the fall of 2001. iraq has declared the presence of 8,500 liters of the substance. he even showed us some kind of test tube with white powder. this turned out to be an invalid argument. damn no chemical weapons. no. incredibly surprisingly, the fact remains a lie at the highest state level and from a high rostrum. boots flying to the us presidency are a terrible insult, especially in the arab world, an assessment from ordinary iraqis that washington did to their country saddam hussein -

this is a threat to americans a threat to neighbors. he is also a threat to the iraqis themselves. there is no doubt about it. in baghdad, work continues that leads to the creation of nuclear weapons. washington then for the first time, perhaps, took an unconditional position . russia is now trying to drag us into the discussion. about what will happen if the war starts. the very fact the beginning of this discussion. how should i say that it's unavoidable. russia is against war and at this point in time i don’t want to discuss this topic. the resolution of disputes of this kind can take place solely on the basis of international law and within the framework of the united nations security council . this is a key issue more important than

cancer itself and there is nothing in the charter of the united nations. that would allow the security council. he decides to change the regime of the political regime in a particular country, whether we like this regime or not, perhaps for the first time since the end of cold war. the world community is faced with such a severe crisis, in fact , with the danger of shaking the foundations of global stability and international law. the system of international security that has developed in recent years should be adapted to the new realities, but in no case should it be destroyed, because we have nothing else in return, but the united states does not listen to anything. and then they were in such a hurry to start the invasion that the address of president bush was put on television ahead of time and everyone saw how it was, and asses.

it is important, of course, to remember that then, by march 2003, only a year and a half had passed since the monstrous terrorist attacks in the united states. i don't think that this was done in the best way. but this is one of the motivations. and in principle, of course, this must be understood. but you know our position she was, uh, not only consistent about the iraqi events. well, tough enough, a military action against iraq is a big political mistake. if we

allow international law to be replaced by fist law, according to which the strong is always right has the right to everything, and when choosing means to achieve their goals, they are not limited by anything. then one of the basic principles of international law, the principle of the inviolability of the sovereignty of the state, will be called into question; one of the goals, in my opinion, of course, is to put it under your own control. oil reserves of this country at the time of the start of the operation. iraq did not pose any danger to neighboring states. not for other countries and regions of the world, because, especially after a ten-year blockade, it was a weak country, both militarily and economically, well , we still don’t know if the iraqi regime had them or if the iraqi regime didn’t have these weapons of mass destruction finds by the alliance forces cannot be

recognized as legitimate. whatever they will be these finds or not, not found at all nothing and a year later, when the number of victims of the battle is not terrorist attacks and civil war broke out. in iraq, more than a million recognized the mistake came out. i understand that nothing can be changed, but i would like the intelligence to be different then, and then it turned out that they were wrong. then they said. wow collapsed hand, well, intelligence to do. everything, it turns out, there were no weapons of mass destruction there, the intelligence data made at that time turned out to be erroneous and the people that we wanted to make free, on the contrary became a victim of terrorism. and the terrorists who

were not in iraq before, they appeared there today, former officers of saddam hussein's army and intelligence officers. they just migrated all of them with the help of the igil, because the united states not only overthrew adam, they also repeatedly mocked. above him, the former leader was humiliated on live television, shown in the most unattractive forms, and then also publicly hanged. most recently , saddam hussein was executed, but uh, because he was accused of massacring the inhabitants of shiite villages, and they were executed there approximately 148 people elsewhere. another figure is such, but during the hostilities. more than 3,000 americans have already died in iraq at the expense of casualties. among the civilians of iraq , it is already estimated according to various expert data that the number goes to a hundred thousand. is it possible to force one and the other, when the war

ended iraq became a sovereign state with free people. after 20 years on the street iroka, restless. i told vladimir about my desire to promote democracy in different parts of the world. let's say how in iraq where there is freedom of religion and the press. of course, we would not want us to have the same democracy as his cancer. i 'll be honest. but, but we really talked a lot on this topic, talking about the formation of democracy, george w. bush clearly learned from his father. few people remember now, but at the end of the eighties , the united states also invaded panama, now you are all the more clear that the main reason is control over the strategically important panama canals, which connects two oceans at once and is also in

the residence of the deposed president us troops when they found a supposedly very suspicious white powder. then it turned out to be just flour, he never hesitated to use force under excuses sucked from the finger anywhere in the world, using his excuse of referring to the need to protect the life and well-being of american citizens. the states

were going to bomb. now they said that everyone has proven that chemical weapons. well, not all, just our experts are talking about something else , they found people there who participated, as they themselves admitted to staging the application chemical weapons. uh, if you haven't seen it, and it would be very helpful for the objectivity of the topics , so that your viewers could have their own opinion on this matter. we found the children of their parents, oh , who were poured with water and who said that we did not understand, that they did not understand that the world was going on, supposedly the victims of a chemical attack were being saved from poisoning. and here is the same boy found later by the film crew. vgtrk is alive and well. together with his father, they said that it was a special shooting. we brought them to gaga to show no one

wants to listen. and after that, tell me everyone recognizes the use of chemical weapons. not all of us think it's fake news and it's been used like before to strike it's a lie, it's a hoax like shaking a vial of alleged weapons of mass destruction in iraq that was planted by the cia on their foreign secretary , and who later apologized for this, but the country has already been destroyed. and this is the same fake, the same stuffing, which has no serious grounds under the seeding. it's all good for us. known, understandable. and even not interesting, i just want to say boring girls who died from zarin, you want to say boring about this, but you are sure that these bodies, uh, are the result of the activities of government troops. i believe, on the contrary, that this is the result of the activities of criminals

, criminal criminal elements and radical terrorist elements who commit these crimes in order to blame the president for this. because there was no serious investigation and there were no dead bodies, maybe there were dead bodies, what happens in war, you look. and how they took mosul, razed everything to the ground there , and look how they took the crayfish so far from the ruins, the bodies have not yet been taken out and buried, you don’t want to remember this, but by the time of the events in syria, discipline. in the western bloc, it has already become ironclad, chirac schroeder, who could afford an independent policy , left, those who came, after them approved even that which caused direct damage, their strangely difficult events around syria when they started, one of the leaders arrived. here i am with him i meet agreed what we will do, how we will do it? specifically? to do this, one from moscow flew to washington and returned to paris as if there were no

agreements up to where the fleet would move there, what we would do, how we agreed, but talk to them directly, that 's all. i'm talking now, i'm not inventing anything, you understand? i'll ask him american. well, you want to be gone, what will happen next. the answer is strange, i don’t know, but if i don’t know what will happen next. why change what is, nevertheless us allies even supported the invasion of libya, which is generally in europe what is called at hand, i'm worried about that ease. with which, in recent years, decisions have been made on the use of force in international affairs, let's say. uh, in political it becomes

a steady trend in the morning. now e is next in line as a pretext for protecting the civilian population. where is the logic, no conscience, neither one nor the other, what is the resolution about. well, here all the experts know everything, they all read this revolution, that there are no ice zones written there. well, what a no-ice zone, if you started carry missiles, bombs and strikes on the territory, well, they grossly perverted, they just violated the organizations of the united again, internal contradictions arose there, which turned into an armed conflict. why is it necessary to intervene from the side in this astonished control of all kinds of crooked regimes in the world. we will intervene in internal conflicts everywhere, there was no talk about the closure. well, well, where is the closing of the sky, if every night they hit the palaces, where gaddafi lives, they say, no, we do not want to destroy him. and why by beat palaces?

because you bring mice out in this way, or something, for sure, people die with these strikes, when they are gone, he has long since escaped, he is sitting in a shelter somewhere, and civilians said, we don’t want to kill you, when some officials are already saying, let 's try to destroy. and who allowed this to be done, what was the court? who took upon himself this right to execute a person, no matter what, and everyone is silent lyria, by the way. in terms of oil reserves, it ranks first in africa and in terms of gas reserves, fourth place right away, of course it begs the question. isn't this the main subject of interest of those who are yelling there today? wow, now politicians in washington have begun to mock at the assassination of the leader of libya, mr. makken, as you know, fought in vietnam. i think that there is enough blood of civilians on his hands. he really

likes it, probably, he can’t run without these scenes of terrible disgusting scenes, reprisal to say, when on the screens of the whole world they showed how he was killed covered in blood. that 's democracy. and who did it drones, including american they struck at his convoy, then by radio through the special forces, who were not supposed to be there on the territory, drove the so-called oppositionists and militants.

and what followed? we know well so far there on chaos confusion