he stands first as it is in the american in the american in the american review of the use of nuclear weapons and the preventive strike of the first strike, including a preventive strike. this must be done so that in the west they understand that we have limiters limiters. they. e, too, e need to conduct an exercise. otherwise, they say that in russia there is no strategic non-tactical trend. we regularly carry out such tests launching new mathematical tests without the fact that the mathematical rocket flies, but it flies with than not affects public opinion. i am talking about this, of course, you can now pretend to be a tsar with a bomb and drop it again on a new land. something or there is well deserved.

that's why well, as a last resort, if we talk about signals, then we can, uh, we are. here in relation to the americans is clearly at a disadvantage. they have tactical nuclear weapons. it is deployed at five bases in european countries in caponers under aircraft already, that is, we need to deploy our statistical part, so to speak some uh special charges. and, uh, move them, uh, to the part of the central warehouses of the twelfth year. this should also serve as signals. i already like this kind of thinking now. uh, in regards to the nuclear test treaties. you know, there are basic agreements that cannot be withdrawn from. it's just not reputational. and in general, here is an agreement in comparison of nuclear weapons, an agreement on a universal ban on nuclear tests , agreements in outer space, he did not apply about not

placing nuclear weapons in outer space. this i am categorically opposed, but we have tse. a number of regime agreements that objectively hold us back and hinder our cooperation with countries such as iran north korea well, for example, the missile technology control regime. why do we need an american one, so to speak? e pure clean mode. i'm not talking there. uh, bacteriological weapons convention . it's a purely political tool with something similar to do, because it's just there for us. well, we scored and we can’t say a word there, but because it immediately turns on. here is the attribute mechanism there was a reason and that's it, and russia is always to blame, russia and syria well, and someone else, probably. the convention on the prohibition of toxic biological weapons, that it prevents the americans from carrying out, e, testing of biological

weapons in neighboring countries, does not interfere at all. 18 of the arrangement is , uh, the heiress, so to speak. well-known to what kind of export control in the cold war the regime with these sanctions has long been much tougher than what we are doing there in these agreements, that is, there is modes that you just need to carefully look at. why china, by the way, many of them do not have what i have listed? here it is on this you can see, well, the last. i want to say that i read today. hmm, that the swiss are going to send their representatives to the nato command structures. i think that soon there will simply be no neutral countries left in europe. well , austria still needs to change the state contract there, but it will change, and

the swiss are from the ninety-sixth year, how they entered into a partnership for the sake of peace. i i remember them, they all switched to nato standards. everyone buys american equipment. they don’t even have to hold, so to speak, another referendum and, in an accelerated way , join us. neutrality in europe this is a fiction, so to speak. thank you, sad but true. it just happened to me that the third part of the scientific council was first shown footage of this comrade from latvia who actually spoke about the peoples of russia in such a tone. now. i think, not only representatives of latvia speak in such a way. we see that the tone is changing in western countries and in

the usa and great britain from what it means the russian people are suffering from the oppression of the political regime that exists in russia. they have moved to the fact that this people does not understand anything. it will not change anyway, so let's move on to the actual program to destroy this state as such and this people , here we need to clearly understand what our western opponents are trying to achieve, because for a long time they suffered, as it seems to me, from two. in their mistakes, one is methodological, when they studied us all the time, as if we were them, and this is already the first mistake, because we are not western. we have a completely different way of life, other values, guidelines, and therefore , each of their attempts to pull some measures on the mechanisms for e, our population came across the fact that they do not work, the second is a disgusting source of information. we, i understand, that their main

consultants from here are those people who every week said that there would be a revolution in russia at the weekend. what means just about the power in russia will not stand it. these people, firstly, are disgusting experts. secondly, they have nothing to do with the population of russia. thirdly, they always give out wishful thinking. now. eh, they have already ceased to distinguish between the leadership of russia and the population of russia and quite openly sets their goals of destroying us as a civilization. you started the cultural and state community in this territory by saying that we were overlaid there by the un security council olympic committee, anywhere. we are members of all these organizations. we have the same leverage as our opponents. i would like to hope that that level of mobilization, that level of readiness for m-m, up to the self-sacrifice

that you show us every time after these trips, will be the same for many of our representatives on external sites, because , uh, i don’t really understand what we are waiting and why are we not imposing a fight on our opponents to such an extent that they don’t have nosebleeds, they don’t know there, at all, how to get to one site in another place in order for us to constantly organize some kind of meanness everywhere, e, various ones that we constantly encounter on a daily basis, we discuss data analysis here, there, and so on. stop. i think it's not a secret, i just want to give an example. he hurts me very much ours, which means american and european. uh, opponents for over 11 years or 12 years now. uh, they invested money , armed and did whatever they wanted with militants in syria, in order to curtail

your investigation, they said that we are russians - this is without any humane. uh, people who support the dictator because we don't care about the local population. they are the only ones. who thinks about this people, and the citizens and they want to free them. now thousands of syrians are under the rubble, and they say, we find it ironic to help syria in this situation. this is how you have to be, how mean, vile, disgusting weeks you have to be in order for thousands people were under the ramparts and not to help the children who are there now, not to help innocent people who, due to a natural disaster, found themselves in this state. that's what they care about only the power supply chains, trading anything, but not people's lives, so hope that there are some. the rudiments of humanism and peacefulness, i think, are definitely not worth it. we no longer

have such doubts. well, that's about the outer perimeter. i want to touch on a few questions, just as my colleagues asked today to discuss our internal problems, i consider it very important to discuss them. a few days ago we held events in the public chamber. i invited colleagues from leading russian universities in order to listen. a year has passed to our attitude to the unified sanctions, thankfully your presentation, i had the opportunity several times to present attempts to maintain the previous system, despite already and the government decree despite the decision of the ministry of science of higher education that all the time there are structures that are trying to move e. e a little bit means we have thimbles before our eyes to say that this is just sleight of hand, but in fact to make the situation even more. so i ask my colleagues. i say something has changed. well, not really,

the requirement has disappeared somewhere. e about the need for publications in these foreign scopuses and in the web of sciency as a requirement, but huge money is allocated to sponsor publications in these journals by our professors. i'm not sure what it is the right idea when purely for political reasons. they us first of all, i wanted us to get out of there ourselves in due time, we didn’t ask us to get out of there as well as from the bologna system. we didn’t get out of there, we were asked to leave, nevertheless we were all pushed out of there already, they themselves said goodbye to these supposedly international rating systems. today we pay people money to publish their ethical publications so that they meet their expectations and advance in these systems. why why don't we can we use this money to promote our own magazines to promote very magazines? in russian, why can't we find money and donate textbooks, teaching aids in huge quantities now, this is the most important thing. we have a liberal

education for 30 years. here it was done on the exclusively liberal approaches of western universities, often simply translated into western textbooks into russian. we pretended that these were domestic textbooks. in fact, they reflected only liberal approaches. now is the perfect time to send not you have to talk about the fact that there is no money. there is plenty of money on this funding, they do not need to be directed to artificially trying to promote themselves in these fake supposedly international organizations. if someone wants to say that this is actually an international ranking and russia has some role there. let me tell you how russia participates in determining the methodology for calculating this rating, who represents russia in this organization. nobody is a private company. can you imagine. now i already hear from your colleagues. many people tell me about this , that the universities, since they are the ministries, apparently will not receive this information, the universities received letters about the kihuez rating, which is published by a british

private company. read us the information. who is publishing where? what are your publications? and we may be in some areas, we will include in the rating. here is the first question. i want to ask. if i now would send a request to all american universities. hello this is a member, public chamber of the sardaryan faculty mgimo policy management. please. give me all the information about your faculty, who where what do you think, at least one university would know nothing. and in general , they would have answered me there on this song, asked the question in a different way. we see that these are our direct enemies. they are no longer competitors. nobody is the enemy. they are fighting themselves. they themselves are trying to create a situation in which damage will be done. to all our citizens, and yet we are still discussing the issue. thank you. we can imagine that in due time our e, leaders of our country. uh, they gave

information to some agencies and organizations of nazi germany or fascist italy or frankish spain there. so they asked how interested we would be in moscow university and what was the situation of mgimovich. here is the situation there, what you wrote there, and we would draw up detailed reports for the management. and this axis, which opposed us. it seems to me that it is absolutely time to end this, and it is necessary, instead of solving some pointy minor issues, to pretend that this is working for a long time we need to radically revise our approaches to , first of all, humanitarian education. and here is the end of what i want to pay attention to extremely. it is important now to promote our humanitarian education on the territory of the countries of the former soviet union, we are losing these states. do not deceive yourself and amuse yourself with reports on how many

people are learning russian in a particular republic. it says nothing in russian. we learn a wide variety of information. we have in many moscow schools in russian they study such a version of history and such approaches to our statehood that it would be better if they taught in swahili in russian here is this information, so the first thing we need to do is me, frankly speaking, with all due respect to my colleagues, natural science specialties are not entirely without difference. well, whoever conducts chemistry, physics or biology in the post-soviet countries is unlikely to somehow strongly affect the value orientations of the local population, their attitude towards russia, well, who is there conducts the history of literature and social science. these here are extremely important. and i want us to be clear. we have completely lost the university environment. we are completely lost. here is a cut of higher circumcision in the post-soviet countries, when we go to

this educational one. excuse the word market and begin to advertise their programs. we say, come to us in the magistracy. pay so much money. get yourself an apartment. and more pass our tests european universities come there a year before a person graduates the university gives him a grant in an amount that is several times higher than the average wage in this state and just talks about only one thing. you then return to your place and the government is fine. you will learn from us and live for a year or two. they teach it there differently than we do here, i know thousands of examples and colleagues will not let you lie. well, it seems that they were already able to and brought a person. he has already entered the auditorium , our colleagues come to him and speak. where did you come? it's not a country at all. you know how bad some kind of catastrophe is here. we 're not going to rethink this yet, are we? way now uh, at least to catch up with our opponents, who are very active in these countries, we open members of the government of those countries that are now actively drifting to the west.

yes, without exception, i studied in manchester, i studied in liverpool, i studied in france, in canada , where are we, where are our personnel, who had to learn from us to go to work there, and for this we have to enter the university late. we have to lead the best schools. e of these countries opens its ninth grade lyceum classes. there people are taught in russian we need an approach. well, until we formulate them for ourselves, until we clearly understand, what are we waiting for? it will be very difficult to spread your soft power to other states without fail. we'll just die. the same people do not need us, our colleagues set fire to more than the first country in the underbelly without a single shot from their side , simply due to their soft power there , the formation of cultural policy and so on. circle we discover that people who have lived in our composition for 300 years now turn out to be us blood enemies. in order to fight this, we must first of all look at culture and education , i agree soft power, of course, a serious thing

is beginning. she is from my point of view from a climate in a warm climate under a palm tree. yes, even on the beach. i think it's better to live than in some snow. where, as a matter of fact, half a year day half a year half a year night, what a colleague says, there is one serious thing, the personnel composition needs to be changed, because now the one who built this bologna system with us is the one who will change it he will change it. i think that there is no hope that these are our principles, which have been in effect for a very long time, to convince them that these principles do not work in the modern world. well, for example, the principle of non-interference in internal affairs. see how clearly we follow it. we do not condemn the macron there for being tough. yellow vests, because this is the principle of non-interference in internal affairs. here we do not want to interfere with us, and they should also follow this should. west

this principle. yes, they abandoned it a long time ago. if you declared yes, no, no, they didn’t declare they interfered, but the soviet union, they just, in my opinion, never declared it. they refused, the americans know by specialty. there they said that they would not be. the soviet union at one time calmly interfered completely for the sake of progress for the sake of the bright future of socialist construction. yes, yes , it was ok. for some reason, we refused it to russia. we do not use the resource that, in principle, can have an impact. well, at least for those groups that are still sane. there in those the same european states, the principle there i do not know which e. diplomat diplomacy is still testing us in a rather strange way. well, let's put it this way. here is what hirsch wrote, we have such unsubstantiated, we

do not go on an international lease without evidentiary factors, that is, we do not apply. there , let's say, uh, the un security council does not call me until we have abu gray there . there were photos, there was a video. that's when it was possible. yes, this, in general, was silent enough, but now we have in our hands, as i understand it, there is information about bio-laboratories, working in ukraine, we received specific data. it would be very important to raise this issue. yes, not for those fifty countries that follow in the wake of the policy of the united states, it is useless to convince them, because their elite and their ruling circles. well, the current one. i think the future they 're aiming for is what they say to washington, then washington says there's nothing there. you know , there is nothing, the chinese are raising these questions , the chinese are still considering the issue that this virus here, uh, that the corona is an artificial product artificial

the element that was distributed. as a matter of fact, the americans, but we now have specific things in our hands, which, by the way, are very scary for the chinese indians, in general , the whole global skirt. these people will listen, yes, or france england collected on this occasion they collected so it is necessary to collect more because now, uh, well, we will have an anniversary on the twenty-fourth, a special, military operation west, in particular, the americans are actively preparing, general assembly, session, general assembly in which we must condemn and, in general, they are processing, but they are not practically working at the level of the embassy so that, well, in countries , so that these countries vote for the ukrainian pro-ukrainian resolution, which condemns russia, where the famous zelensky plan is proposed how to resolve this issue the very problem

is the price look of such a dedicated dealership. decision of the general assembly. no, be sure to present comrade general alexandrovich very correctly said. we carried out and our resolutions were not adopted. yes, once again it is necessary sometimes. and once again, on the basis of what, on the basis of the data that we have, an absolutely stalemate, because the west will still not hear anything. we will speak with the chinese comrades. the chinese comrades, by the way, also raised the topic of explosions on the gas pipeline of the general assembly, we understand perfectly well how the voices lie. so this is a real stalemate. that is, here we were only able to get through when we were chairmen, the rest of the chairmen are rejected and that's it. why am i talking about what do we need? constantly, as it were, to abandon those structures that exist, yes, we must build our own, we are trying all the time. save now. the world that no longer exists, you know, yes, and he, you see, just now

made a decision. you can probably only explain to me what it is. they show that preparing a resolution to all countries, except for the two russia and belarus, what is it all about? and we happily declare this, we are preparing to judge you and will not show you and we are talking about how devotion they are. we can't you will make excuses later, what is called making excuses, just break it once so that the fist already buzzed. now i even know where to embed. well, i also know to embed, in general, where, well , we must already cut it. maybe we don't have to wait. and why? so i spoke with the guys at the front, almost no one. i saw no doubt that sooner or later nuclear weapons would still be used, where to assemble the general assembly. if new york is no more, yes, it is tactical, well, one option. well, it's just that when you talk to people at

the front, they say, very simply listen, that's enough already. nothing to smear. it is necessary to smear. lula has just arrived before silva a , the president of brazil, but a physical member. and i came to the canoe, well, in general, i would meet people, by the way, younger than here, so that's why we discussed the issue. which is one of the main questions for brazil. it's a matter of prestige. this seat is a permanent member of the united nations security council. in principle, well, the voice of a person known to us, we could also promote this idea about changing the security council. the un has been applying there since 1994. four countries are applying.

this is brazil india and germany with japan who germany and japan have ever had we have a clear statement that we are ready to accept brazil and india, so to speak, but these two well, firstly, europe will have too large a representation there are already two european countries there is, in general, you can find an explanation just germany yet. well, in addition to germany, the japanese initially we do not have a peace treaty with japan yes, there is no peace treaty. i just i think that we should impose entry into germany, but let the chinese impose it on japan. well, here is the extension. at the expense of all states that are now trying to pursue such an independent policy, maybe also ours, africa well, this is some kind of south african republic, a vulgar colonial republic, when all these bastards are former colonialists. they didn’t, and the remaining

name about africa in general forgot to us something there through the lip tells, and he would say what they say in africa about france of the french soldiers. here in july, you know the president will talk to the presidents of african states, too, it would be very correct to circulate it. the idea of ​​reforming the united nations olympic committee listen, i remember the eighties eighties, i myself became there, i stood guarding these, well, the students were left to guard these actions, the objects were buried. well, yes. yes, yes, it was necessary to carry out the fact that the cubans they trained in our three-room hall did not go to the subway themselves, they had to detain the basketball players. here you look not from the bottom up. no need to keep them did not take the subway, they took the police and went, then she stood there saying, you go

to stop them, so the student also participated in this. well, i'm just saying, then the good will games were already held. well, that 's why the good will games, they can't come up with some kind of eurasian games of bad will. no, why should the eurasian games, which, together with china, be held with good strictness in such a way that this olympic committee understands what can arise with the pro-western olympic committee, understands that such a structure can arise that will parallel to, and the international olympic committee. we can do it ourselves, the osce, where do they want to win us from? i'm surprised now too. listen. why is there an organization for the security and cooperation of europe if there is no russia

? well, we can recognize ourselves as not europe, leave this organization, in fact, which is blocking us now , we can’t do anything there, the same as ozkho and much more. no it didn't work out that understanding. unfortunately, that's the world that was his no longer return and not return it not quite. wait. i understand that international organizations, but you are proposing to return. here but there is so remove. uh, in the comments, that is, in fact. you say that the world that has developed is also useless. no, you just offer god to the comintern when we create a parallel structure, well, then they were communistically needed by the people and we will continue to hold sports and athletics, the liberated peoples , anything, great idea, great idea of ​​​​the country, who themselves want to play this game must

understand. and what will they get from it. and most importantly, they have a question that they have, but you will not betray us. i say, well, russia is a difficult partner, but a reliable one. which is always fulfilled necessarily no, putin is a reliable partner. and in russia we saw other presidents in russia, we also saw yeltsin, and therefore now when we talk with cuba there, they have forgotten to us how we behaved towards them in the nineties . we are now talking to europe, and the european communist former forces left, they forgot how we are the eighties nineties they betrayed them, we gave them to be torn to pieces completely. well, of course, we knew the hondas, listen, we knew the guys who

served the stasim and handed over the guys who served the troops. we betrayed them, we didn’t even transport them to russia. africa is the same azize. the same one says. where are you? about what? well, yes, now you have putin we believe, and what kind of ideology does the country have? this is a cruel question. trust must be earned, especially after the nineties, after the second half of the eighties , the nineties, of course, must be the basis surrendered everyone. what do we want to put in place? now, like the sudanese military yesterday, or something, they gave the go-ahead to the base construction of the construction of the base, but for and what needs to be done to turn us back to cuba enough? even if the flag will stand there about the technical exchange, we, in my opinion, have definitely returned 15 years ago, no? no,

well, it's important. naturally. that's why i say to return my presence there. although here to return. that's important. yes, it's important, well cubes cube scuba. it could also reach an agreement. i don't know, in principle, no , maybe just one could agree, especially on the basis of the fact that the point is that i used to be built on the basis, first of all, of ideology. yes. uh, secondly, they are now also especially great. you know us on the terms of the absence of ideology, as there is no, no commercial basis and on a cube we have good relations, in principle, good relations, in contrast, by the way, telling us the answer, where the vietnamese are a little bit, a different approach, they are more pragmatic. they now have a slightly changed enemy. yes, the problem is with china they exist, they interact with them and