15 ago no, wait, it's camming, but it's important. that's why i say, well, to return your presence there. although here is the flag to return there. that's important. yes, it's important. well, cuba could still come to an agreement, i don’t know, in principle, no , maybe i just couldn’t, we could have come to an agreement, especially on the basis of the fact that i used to build on the basis, firstly, of ideology . yes, but, secondly, they now also especially know us in the absence of ideology. how are the commercial fundamentals and on the dice we have a good relationship, in principle, a good relationship in contrast, by the way, telling the answer to us, where the vietnamese have a slightly different approach, they are more pragmatic. they now have a slightly changed enemy. yes , they have a problem with china, they interact and, on the other

hand, compete in india. as for cuba, there is pragmatic cooperation, especially on the basis of a kind of common past and commercial interests . can you calmly build another question? commerce never commerce plus us not only us not only it is important, so to speak, to create our outposts in the global, so to speak, space from latin america and in africa and asia , the question is that it should not only this base emphasizes the status of ours as a global power here rationality usefulness, and here it is necessary, of course, to negotiate negotiate with our partners, partners , allies and partners, in particular with the same china if you take the jews out of here, imagine

you to the rank of alexander yatsenko now could be saved only by the soviet people, other fish. not here, yevgeny tkachuk i’m lucky i’m sure i’ll be with you until the end of my life. fedor dobronravov is considered to be calculated in regiments , laid out four moves ahead , sergey makovetsky sees his comrades for the campaign ahead of me, comrade, kozelev, konstantininsky saving the road.

for the chinese now, after the flight of the balloons, this is an aggravation of the chinese with the americans. true, they were coolly trolled, but nevertheless, the fact that the question is a direct military confrontation in at least no one is filming in washington, especially considering that china is now weaker in the nuclear ska component than the united states and there will only be a thousand warheads by the year 35 if they do not accelerate, so the conversation is wide about building a new world order with building our own infrastructure, that is, a system of international organizations, in my opinion, this

conversation is overdue. what's the point of being friends with us? well, look, there is such a side called serbia. do you have a leader , a president, who takes over colossal withstand unrealistic pressure while responding from russia to get more support? here is what our country tells him. listen, you are the only one in europe holding the position. that's just the only unprecedented pressure. well, the diplomats here sometimes still interfere with some shitty journalists. still unhappy with them. no, journalists are one thing. here are our states. serbia did not support him, the relationship between putin and vučić is excellent, but the question is not only at the level of the leader. and that's what we're talking about this country. this is how russia can help this country with economic weapons, we supplied them. well, listen, we sold weapons to them, of course we sold them to them, they paid the commercial price there without question.

but when we say the country, the americans say, yes, you go to our bourgeoisie and you will have a cookie jam, and for friendship with us, we tell you what will happen, and you immediately get sanctions imposed by the american europeans began to put pressure on you, and we will do what let's do that. well done. that is, we are both willing to help those strange. which we are treated by many reasons we are good for them what we do, but this is also one of our problems. here are the americans. there are usa there are foreign aid aid programs. they are developed. they've been a long, long time since, uh, the fourth point of truman's forty- nine. this is the direction of the whole policy, which is well funded. e, from which e comes not only deliveries, so to speak, e, and weapons and equipment and much more, but including, by the way, training is also carried out at the expense of

knows everything, but we need to do this. yes, now everyone is looking at the system of relations russia belarus belarus for the fact that she did not flinch and with us shoulder to shoulder received such a set of sanctions. we have now begun to carry out integration processes there, what should we do? well, we do everything for belarus. well, it's just real that the belarusian people understood that the belarusian authorities understood. here we do everything for them to say, yes, thanks to great russia, in our economy, the growth of the welfare of the people , the growth and something there are guys who, let's say , in a different geographical area. and there he will go to the senzo all the time and offer his services will say no to russia and more profitable not only, because they say we had a common past, because if the future, because russia helps calculates the development opportunities of russia represents the market.

which part of the belarusian industry is focused on our market? how much is the question. yes? that's why i say, it means eighty percent. yes, but belarusians must clearly understand what friendship with russia gives them. if it worked like that, unfortunately, these former ones are ours. republics of independent states all these years received from us disproportionately more, at least, than from them, unfortunately, these years. these are ours with you, because it’s a delusion. we work and help countries and people, and they and i know this for myself, they tried with me to point out the term by the leadership of the country, they teach someone with soft power, they just buy someone and have such a result and yes and no, because when we worked with these countries, but

they also work beautifully. and when you look real, what did they do? it was anything but ugly, but we reported, but gigantic investments, but now we are not talking about belarus. although, in belarus too, therefore, when we speak, we provided assistance, indeed, it was not targeted, then. we thought that if we drank at the level of regional committee secretaries, then everything would be fine. this is not the case, and we are not really engaged, nor civil society. i explained to the people what will be their advantage? we have invested. and how much of this money was plundered by local elites as a result of the most complex corruption schemes? here's verki to example ukraine and what? no, the point is that you remember the objective processes. in the late soviet union, i’m just testifying to you that armenia or georgia lived incommensurably better than we in

the krasnodar territory incommensurably better, and still they wanted freedom and independence. why can't it be explained again? well, if this is not done, then this desire will work much stronger and faster. but when she worked with africa, when we worked with the middle east according to these schemes, which andrey to and the elites say, grew in a clear understanding, and the people grew up with a clear understanding of where friends are, where enemies are, you don’t have to wait from people what they will come to say. thank you. you have to work hard every day for them to want to say. thank you very much, they understood why it is pointless to be offended by the peoples, but this will not work. he just lost his influence and we will get a large number of hot spots, but we need to build a system. that's what he told henry at the same time, for example, now in europe there were a lot of programs to attract our students for included education.

now they have closed almost all of this. there are three countries in the east, japan, south korea and china, which often attract at their own expense, so to speak, they work so that they learn the language, of course, so to speak, and the military of all the countries that we interesting. we have free and stay free. party government elite we must study and live free of charge. it should be. yes, there must have been. there must have been a mechanism. that's when you started talking about business. let's do it in time. uh, in the states i was on an internship at the expense of the kaiser , aluminum was such a company that allocated funds and for free, please, well, there are trade unions there . here are the main trade union centers archives, please, they were open, and accommodation, food, transport-transport - everything correctly paid for the company. why because

it was beneficial for her to have a certain level of taxes. she made more money. than taxes. it is better to donate something well known to some fund, which is called and then it will be used at the university as a famous photograph. you know india yes, our reformers of the nineties. in one of the european countries who were taught something there and what they taught whoever didn’t die, on the run, gets up to do this around the country, as if they taught everyone through the buffet through the lip. how can we simply have those authorities that represent a whip historically stronger than those that represent themselves as beautiful carrots. our gingerbread is always dried up, of course, it is extremely important. i probably completely agree. but i can say for sure that the ability of any party got with us regardless of the degree of its practical thinking. it depends in direct proportion to

the victories of our army in ukraine. this is the most important thing, and when we will win in ukraine. i assure you that they will stand in line, oh, to be friends, there is, of course, a moment, look, you are absolutely right, we have the talent to achieve victory and then lose results in peacetime, so this condition is necessary, but the disadvantage of belarus has changed. i want to say that look, after all, we now understand in what position russia is in what the situation does not require anything, give us show an image and belarus held a referendum in the ninety-fifth year, it concluded an agreement with that russia that did not positively give us any model, because after all , the physiological cultural moment of a sense of community lies at the heart of it, and it so happened that the belarusian people in the nineties entrusted specifically. here is alexander lukashenko how

is vladimir putin’s russia to lead this course ? the generality, of course, is much wider, but it turned out that it was in belarus that these forces won. in general, what you are talking about reminds me of a movie so old from the sixties, in my opinion, a cold-blooded hatch is called half a human there, he gets, uh, into such a correctional prison and there is such a moment to resolve the contradiction, they fight on saturdays satisfied. and here he is a strong veteran of the war, he has a purple heart there, and he is a big one there. vaughn is thrashing. first he falls down and gets up. everyone respects his will, he keeps it to the end, but he almost kills, but he survived, well, he inspires respect, but with this kind of relationship is such an eccentric blow holds, well, here i have an eccentric, but then he wins when he starts to change the rules. you have a feeling that now measures relations with russia well done but somehow, somehow , the rule needs to be changed in one word, because if we are talking about between treaties and

agreements, well, of course, we need our principle, belarus is now like this actually after the events of the twentieth year. why the hell do we support commitments in contracts where we didn't set the rules? why are we developing relations with the russian federation, because we form the rules moscow and minsk and you actually accept this form not about nealism, when someone else's e, development model is imposed on you, but these problems are certainly important. i still wouldn't want us to not mention the simply amazing programmatic interview, andrzej. du dofigarov this, but we need to talk about this, firstly. i congratulate you, the president of poland recognized the inclusion of the liberated territories and crimea into the russian federation. i will explain why he bluntly stated more definitely large in

terms of population and territory of the state of eastern europe, but let's say russia, he does not consider europe, this comes from the spirit of the interview, but ukraine is europe i have a question. panya, if poland is the largest in terms of the population of the territory , it turns out that these regions have already gone to the russian federation. because if you take any reference book, ukraine is definitely larger in terms of territory. uh, the more, let warsaw somehow decide, or it's already some kind of ambition for western ukrainian territories. second, there a lot of stories. and that's what we 're talking about, not even the industry is not competition. the economic is not some kind of struggle for markets, but a lot of historical pains that go on and the poles have more of them than ever, because he always returns to history, but i will not say that this ignorance is conscious distortion. see what he says. and this is an attempt to push russia out of history, and

from moments that are fundamentally important for russian ideology. he says poland was the most affected state in the years of the second world war. it is a lie. we can just prove it with numbers, but i think even those who interviewed french journalists. they are well aware that the president of poland is lying. then he declares. and he asks. well, here you are, as it were, opposing russia, and why are you making claims to germany and he begins to explain, he says, well, they caused us great damage, and we ourselves pay attention to the question of whether they will be grateful or not if they help and give some kind of image. we rebuilt ourselves after world war ii war, that i will seriously believe in it, that in their forty-fifth year direct deliveries of the gratuitous soviet union saved them from starvation. e. the soviet union took over half, if not more, of the restoration of the historic center. warsaw, only direct direct assistance, not counting everything else she made up. well, according to various estimates, more than 500 tons of gold, there are several tens

of billions of dollars in modern terms, and he says we did it all ourselves. and what is important here, there is still a hidden moment. this is the war waged by the west only against russia and the interview of president duda emphasizes who his competitors are? there is an open enemy, russia is a ward, and he is about him. so it means patronizingly speaking zelensky , he interprets his motives. he already perceives zelensky as his vassal. and there it’s just verbally visible in this interview, he has two competitors whom he doesn’t like and he has a journalist’s phrase about him directly. this is france and this is germany , this is france and germany, which the united states once formulated as old europe europe which potentially with other leaders can get out of control, they want to belittle and push aside to make it funny. i even think that we help them a little bit in this. here, exposing a funny mokron. we help

, er, to weaken this image of a strong europe, they of this and although we offer to stand for him somewhere, inflate him with a straw. i don't offer anything. while stating the meanings that are laid down. a-a are laid down directly in the president's interview. poland, that is, they expose wide, because i was funny. and if chirac comes after the macron, we will not exhibit his death, which, with his policy, belittles that very great france, probably the last great president who was. as a matter of fact , jack chirac is, but it goes to cheat, well, not through a straw. unfortunately, in the literal sense of poland, there are simply colossal ambitions. this is not just a second naughty, but a new front. anti-russian, he directly says 4% of gdp for the defense industry, there will be tanks , there will be planes, we are preparing for a direct confrontation with russia, he talks about the zone polish interests.

this is the baltic states, he mentions the kaliningrad region, because when they say the suwalki corridor, you already understand, they talk about kaliningrad, this is such femism they need kalinin and he directly says that poland will support anti-state forces in belarus , in fact, the president of poland directly threatens in his interview the constitutional order of the republic of belarus says, and if it works out, and there, then, probably, it will work out in the future and in russia, in fact, polish citizens should understand, but we understand, this is a program of war. duda, pursuing his political line inside poland on the eve of the elections, and in principle, he formulated a program for a long-term war, a program that puts poland in an extremely vulnerable position. moreover, they do not take into account the interests of their voters, if anna lena ber god is there only and declares to spit on the voters. so they closed, and

the beaver border crossing on the territory of belarus that they did, they actually worsened the situation and life of their podlazhsky voivodeship. it was largely tied to trade including well, the usual cross -border cooperation is a territory where people , not that they have been interacting for tens of hundreds of years , are used to living in such an environment, and they, despite not informing anyone , close this item. by doing this, they worsen the life of the polish national minority on the territory of belarus, which can no longer , for example, enter the territory of poland in a light regime. but the most important thing is that they were wildly annoyed by this without a visa and are still annoying. this is a visa-free regime for the entry of polish lithuanian latvian citizens to the territory of the republic of belarus because when these people come to us. this is the same soft power. this is the same diplomacy that sees the reality in our country. it differs from what is going on in their media , that is, it doesn’t stand before anything here, soft

or new authoritarianism, which polish political scientists themselves spoke about, we have ended with a new sanitation regime. i remind you that reorganization is that dictatorial uh, that dictatorial government that it was after the may revolution of the twenty-sixth year, józef and philosophical, in fact, we got, uh, authoritarian poland , which is galloping marches towards totalitarianism and the creation of a new empire and the first victim will not be russia , the first victim of this polish empire, we set, of course, ukrainian statehood. now advertising. after that, we will continue to create.

with my own hand, this was handed over to me by the guys that you freed. for a considerable part of artyomovsk, the enemies call him bakhmud, but how they explained to me that the guys in the donbass did not say this was artyomovsk. we ourselves know what to call it. our cities, and they say good champagne is very good classic classic vladimir vladimirovich you fought so much for the donbass, you can never have this bottle against and out of respect,

because, well, you must admit it is a rarity. right here from the battlefield. here, however, there is a mistake. i didn't know it could trigger so many errors. e in the word russia, what happened? ukraine but for some reason they wrote here for ukraine, these are questions for borisusky. yes, yes, well, now there is no doubt that this is our russian plant, after all, the idea itself, as i said to move the champagne plant there, the film belonged to stas ivanovich mikhail , it was so that vladimir vladimirovich was from our program. moreover, grapes were used from our russian crimea , of course, yes, so, let you have a collection. thank you brought directly did not work. i have a collection of champagnes never long keep champagne wines vladimirovich hope we soon you must. be sure after each trip we collect information and our

fund, the people of the victim want to show that we have now made the transfer. it was a lot of money and that's from our fund. as you can see , they were handed over to the fighters of certain units, who specifically left applications, and everything is there and, let's say, so are the cars. yes, there is everything there, everything that the guys wrote, according to the list. everything is there for them, from what is necessary in order to comfortably exist in a war, ending what is necessary to effectively solve the assigned tasks and thanks to those fighters who trusted us, they trusted us and are very pleased. from them, it turns out, a kind word. igor means to bring you from odessa. i 'll bring you. yes, i kind of got used to it. let's get together, hurry up. from what

to discuss? it seems that the lord cannot be mocked, and the fact that they burn the koran is that they are the most terrible sin in our christianity. as i understand it, islam is probably the same, this is holla on the lord they have on the almighty and therefore this is the end of them. i have no. in this no doubt we will be their end , since russian russia is considered god's chosen people and all the peoples inhabiting russia, so to speak, have an attitude to this. that is, therefore, as it has happened more than once in history, so to speak, we will have to drive the cotton wool back into the tunic, which today has again performed, because that is what is happening. here i look, i just speak for my own, i do not believe that i live at this time. like when what i see is that they get up satanic dances in the temples. well, well, it's like before, i read

when so to speak, there that such it is possible? no, well, people still have some kind of mind, some kind of soul , some kind of destiny. no, this is evil spirits that crawled out of the given task and we are reasonable, just hammer it back there the second one, we want it or we don’t want a war with the west for a long time, we all understand this, and we will come to the point that we will be forced to use the experience of the soviet union in the criteria and approaches and estimates of the internal enemy. and so to speak methods of countering it i'm not saying what to copy. i say use because the west is the same enemy to act. he will be much the same.

i don't think that the driving force behind european colonialism was anything other than greed.

indigenous peoples were considered scum, outcasts who needed to be wiped off the face of the earth. only one thing is important - the nation of the lord hitler promised the very aggressive policy, with the help of which it would be possible to divide the world anew.

i'll give an example, let's say well, well organized. so to speak, motivated to eat prayer breakfasts, which are held by the president of america annually wire through them, i just understand it now, i used to, maybe i didn’t want to. we had a lot we were relaxed. well, who's there? what are there? what are there? clowns? some went in these there some kind of hats.