everything is definitely there. i'm not telling you that it's interesting. i'm just to yes quickly decide and make you know. yes, i want everyone to have everything tomorrow, i'm talking about it, even i'm just talking about the essence of these processes. i say because we have enough specialists, we have enough priests who are ready to go there. i can say that we have even more of them than sometimes so to say, even the church let them go there, why because they want, as it were dan they tell us, listen well, just without anything, just like in a conditional speaking on a bicycle, but you don't have to go. i don’t need to go there in the case when they got into deadly dangerous situations just like that, it’s necessary for people to get through. excuse the military training initially, so that they, well, at the front, understand how to behave, they can’t hold weapons in their hands, as i understand it, our study was orthodox, well , tactical medicine, of course, they need to be given an understanding in the course, but how to behave during shelling this is not important, but besides, besides this, i can simply say that, in fact, in fact, this is important from a political point of view, because one of the trump cards of our opponents is precisely this conversation between the orthodox and the orthodox, who is also orthodox. it's gone - it's a bad question. who is

orthodox, then orthodox is the one who says, i'm a mouse, as ukraine says, we want to go west. we want together with the west together with the west. what's this? unity to all those destructive, so to speak, processes that take place there, which means that someone should explain this, but i even say it again, even it is important here and this moment itself does not lie there. you see, here you can pretend, so to speak, fake. and when a guy like this is the steppe, so to speak, this line is there. yes, he comes up, says, i want to be baptized. it 's not a lie, it's not a lie . it is there and the last one is literally there in that the second part was a speech there in lugansk at the pedagogical among them there was a meeting with the empolits of the army posts, on these same ones, what i want to say about e people. eh, here in lugansk there are teachers of students and so on and so forth, yes. well , a big thank you to them. here they all have. we must learn patriotism. yes,

they need to learn patriotism. people live in extremely e, such, so to speak, difficult conditions. here although it is clear in lugansk now. it is much calmer than in donetsk, but nevertheless, for example, for example, in these universities there are practically no male teachers, they are all mobilized only by women, it is hard for them to help them. they need help. this is important and learn a lot from them not from the guys. these, so to speak, yes, and teachers, uh, and the last thing. what to say so, including, as it were, yes, there you can talk about their relationship with our bodies. e higher. now is the time, so to speak. yes, the beginning of the integration of these territories. they are so rather specific , approximately, what we were talking about here, so the pencil spoke, so to speak, yes, colleagues in about the change of consciousness. uh, i mean, they live there. uh, in the consciousness of the fact that, firstly, there is, so to speak, there is a war , as it were, yes, and, secondly, they live in creating what they want in russia, and from here they fly in , so to speak, i would provide the papers, but you fill out the form. have you written articles on this

stinking cattle, so to speak, how many have you written? and you have international connections, what are my friends? well, listen, well, as it were, that is, or people live in a completely different dimension, and how openly they harm or, most importantly, do not the task was set completely from above the donic cardinal, based on the existing challenges and national goals. this is important, but people there perceive it very sharply. i have everything . well, look, i, of course, could start with stew. ah. although, except for andy warhol. i don’t know the situation of cans, and even in the picture there are not even dummies. i'm still a nick. i’ve been finding out for many years correctly with her borya divorced her husband a long time ago good st. petersburg businessman belotserkovsky she will still help the church. so this can be finished.

because seryozha spoke about people who want, who write until the last one died. those who passed 30 there was when such an old story is a myth about the scythians, whose slaves rebelled when they left. on a campaign. married with their wives

fought back heroically, then these returned , they simply realized that they were not. something is not going well , they put down the swords and took the whip and everyone fled, except for the mountain people. vasily livanov also wrote remarks, but back in soviet times, the story of a daughter on fire. yes, indeed , for more than 30 years, we have been building a system colonies.

if it was like this everywhere, why don't we look like this for 100 years? how many more have been prepared now they are not continuing to be prepared in all those departments that we are talking about, keep going, guys. and today there are people who are guided by this, and today there are people who are building their future on this, and therefore you can invite people with you if you want? they work for the compromising economy they work for. well, for example, well, i know palestit, which i have been doing for 40 years not in order to develop my own. no, why is it so that the banking system redistributed the money, redistributed it and withdrew it. well, where did he bring it in each country his own and it remains. god forbid this money

is poured into the underfinanced russian economy, and i look at flights, in which i know every first 15% of the money that pours in 15%. there go instead of saving. and we have even more. yeah, now the personnel, and he can not work. otherwise, he's so tight. he learned it like that. hello in this world , these are the best rated of all mentioned in international organizations, ministers work for this, but legislation, like ours, for this work, it is all written for this, and the movement is written by the rules. oh, maybe i won’t be just wondering, that’s just such a state duma he wrote. well, i didn’t write everything to me most interestingly, from which such a percentage was

all the way for presidential instructions of non-fulfillment is not the most interesting thing. from what such discussions arise, including russian legislation, because life change. then you can, of course, you need to change change. and i looked what i was waiting for. listen . this audience needs to understand what's going on. that is, we are not talking about all the legislation that is relevant to the functioning of the central bank, we do not have a federal entity. the area of ​​legislation is to be determined so that

andrey and i will study for a day, and the sharakh octagon with threads hanging from them, there are octagonal structures. yes, the aliens on our side rushed to troll the americans with all the obviousness. well, look, and there is a completely understandable process. this the process is called, uh, liquidation. ah, the russian empire. she’s the soviet union she’s a report from her the russian federation is left there and if anyone has any other illusions on this topic, then, in my opinion, that’s all for us, to be honest, you guys shouldn’t be president, your shouldn’t be strange , and in yours there shouldn’t be anything of yours at all , what is called, by the way, russophobia, the word i don’t like it, but you won’t pick it up otherwise. well, this is such an erasing of everything from history with an eraser, there is a patriotic war yes

if there wasn’t it, it would be worse than a git, why there is movie music and everything else. well, great , how can one still continue to say and do something here, relying on the topic of international law, some agreements signed by us or wonderful phrases. minister celose, well, we are ready at any moment for negotiations with ukraine without preconditions for a peaceful one, i don’t know that we don’t talk about terrorists. and zelensky and dmitry olegovich, the indians and the chinese are correct. because i understand, friends and

partners are about the second level of chinese management is enough. or xenia should come in. i know very well that they are talking about us, and from which clan. that's curious. well , i'm telling you now because it's important. ah. so that's what they say about us, and what they think about us, firstly, it's clear to the chinese not to the indians that we are revisionists. we are revisionists. there is nothing more disgraceful. there are khrushchevs, they could somehow survive gorbachev. it's just that's all, and secondly, are we not answering what we are obliged to answer, self-respecting tangerines? they cannot and will not understand this , not in india, by the way, nor in china, because a self-respecting power cannot

and has no right to do this. she has no right to miss those blows that we miss, limiting ourselves to words, and no one expected from us that there would be nothing in response to the explosions of the nord stream , that, well, pipelines , cables, transak would fly into the air. the ocean is here. well, if that's not the case. they look at you strangely and understand that well, you guys probably can't go. well, horrors were expected from you, like from that bear in the tale of saltykov-shchedrin ate. how much can you say, but the red lines

they have no one can believe about how you will bear. and by the way, before the start of their own , they were afraid, they were very afraid, and at the beginning they were afraid, and then negotiations began. this is a huge mistake, catastrophic, and it will have an effect, the only thing i can do for myself. as an explanation for this, give the time 40 years , the time of moses has not yet passed. here's another ten years. if we live, and then we will enter, probably into the inhabited land, since in it it is necessary to enter, because the expectation of the american establishment. yes, european with indian, what year did you immediately

expect this from our country? maybe, according to some old soviet habits , an immediate response to anything. whatever, only if you know about you, that is, you have nuclear arsenals, and you will use them, well, the israelis call it. and then no one will pay attention to you to the question of our nuclear doctrine. with this i ceased permitted speeches. and you say the peasants yes eugene anna i i absolutely agree with what you said. uh, i was only talking about the narrow issue of confiscation of the property of specific private companies. that's about the answer is not to answer. i'm handsome, but i'll start somewhere else. but i

cannot help but respond to the speech of the marxists. right? uh, the soviet union is undoubtedly part of our great history, so to speak, the russian state is short , but in general, how to say it so. that short period was largely due to precisely the teachings that completely took it last release. in its implementation, maybe i don’t know, but i have one big complaint against all the communists, our bolsheviks , they didn’t like russia, for the most part they didn’t believe that she could do something on her own lenin believed. here, my father was a communal war won by the people by the leadership of those people who, on june 24, 1945 , in the lyceum drank a lot of fat not for the soviet plant, but for the russian. i thanked him for his patience, another people would have us over for such leadership of the military actions. this was said by the head of the soviet state.

by the way, he is the only one from the bolsheviks who began to rake back in the historical direction what all the rest of lenin trotsky thought was just a wick, which should be divided here, because georgievich’s roll says ordinary communists who loved the tools of the logical top in the soviet system, for which and communication idea. of course , it was not only supranational, but outside the country. i will even say more than that, i even use it, if it was a first glance, it was here russian, but let's say it. so on this occasion, it means that the problem is that i will even confirm the words that in the war people joined the party before the tech committee went into battle. you know that in the event of captivity - this is death, it was a special act of patriotism, but it was not connected with the fact that they believed in marx and did not conditionally believe there, that something else is a much

more complicated thing for everyone - then don't say, there were millions of people who i just can say that there is a difference, they were wrong. maybe they weren't. well, now we really just can’t talk about simple guests at the front, but from the top once again at the front they really died, and first of all, there were communists. this is all clear to the first, the problem is not this, the problem is that you said that only in the soviet way can we restore something once again for 70 years. hmm well, because lenin considered russia to be real, and only i said they use soviet methods can restore a lot. i think she first define what we call soviet limiting secondariness. that's what we call soviet. but when let 's have been listed primary in a long way, what to say, the founder of the soviet state, so to speak, wrote what he wrote, therefore trotsky, therefore, about who

was also the founder of the soviet state. all the rest of them were all waiting, that of course the russian people are so much in favor, so bezent, that we, of course, will start a revolution here, but at least the german workers will not come, they are ordinary after that, and she wrote to lenin at the beginning of the revolution doomed if we don't smash the fireman of the revolution and all of us kirdy. well, because, well, that with the russian people, then this realization already came. that it is necessary to build a sovereign system and this new idea came, that it is alien to marxism about building socialism in one idea in a single country, which was forced to come and then the figure of stalin appears, which, by the way, very often is a certain kind of theoretical bone of contention between different, so to speak groupings of the current non-reds who are trying to reconcile stalin, for example, with the original creators of the revolution, but that's not even the point. i just want to say that the soviet leaders from the very beginning, by the way, by the way, and in the end they suffered from the same disease of the secondary disease when

oil revenues appeared. the first thing the soviet leaders did was to abandon any development programs in general. we are in this situation with a developed we lost to the americans space lost. let's admit more than that, you understand, we had factories, so to speak, in fact, undoubtedly military wonderful wonderful seventeenth year again. because it was supposed to be a revolution in russia. no, it's not a category, wait a minute. these are not secondary categories. no, of course not, because in the first place it was assumed that the plekhanovs abandoned this, of course, therefore lenin it was, when, under the influence of the plekhanovs, then a rethinking began and it was just so primary. we had one of the most dynamic governments in europe sorry, the seventeenth year. well what do you think? what secondary, who else of the european governments has made at least one tenth one hundredth of what the young soviet republic did. well, not a decision that

was made, after all. let's build a red army - this is secondary from someone with relatives from someone, which removed the secondary. nepal programs that were it was secondary, so, well, but they were unique yes, they were unique the proposed question of financial monetary circulation. what were the secondary ones? yes, we took the plan that was there in the nep, so to speak, this very one. yes, nothing absolutely successful ordinary, who else do you have at least once such an implant was usually unscrewed. oh lord everywhere is a lot, because there was no change of form there was not. of course, we abandoned war communism. why refused turned out to be empty no turned out to be empty, because otherwise you did not win the civil war. well, okay. well, that is, as it were, the ruling party has the right to consider what marxism is? well, well, well, any, real, current government crushes

abstract teaching under itself, well, one question. why, when it ceased to crush under itself, then the soviet union dies in our country history, as if ours in soviet history. here's how to argue something about this , the obvious fact that the only leader who was, so to speak, clear in the history of our country did. here was stalin, who does not like many, of course, he does not take the people, but this is the only person who really moved away from dogmatic marxism, so to speak, who during the war between the semi-automatic vladimir ilyich lenin was good, who not only moved away to domestic marxism, but hot russians almost completely abandoned it guys from now on will manifest in such an important factor as culture, so look how primary the soviet culture of the twenties and thirties was. well, listen, well, from

the fact that they were not shot, so to speak, it is clear the elite, which, so to speak, was clearly brought up. no, but not the elite. she, of course, then the population still appeared there. well, there were natural systems preserved, by the way, the education system. they generally arise that the soviet machines, other systems of education insolvency that the earlier soviet years of power, that was all the worst thing that is possible, including in the system of sexual freedom there, is the emancipation of perversions. everything was brought here. all that is possible. well, it's another matter that later, when the civil war ended and it became clear that the next war would be speedy, but it was obvious to everyone. yes, it's like 20 years. during this period, something had to be done. this was invented by a person who, by the way, by the way, did not allow further destruction, by the way. ah, the church. this is also finished by such a mother. here, well maybe so i don't know. well, he was his main movement. it's just how she did it.

it was not for nothing that during the war the main offensive operations were given the names of non-soviet russian commanders. what, why it's like a lot that it's not just that the names of these people, so to speak, it's clear the stalins appear. it’s not just that they didn’t just return, by the way, they say, the royal epaulettes and not just then, by the way, it was decided that the priests were also sent to the army a little-known page in the forty-third forty-second year , at first the secret conference took place, then it was published, however, then in the forty-third year, the secondness surprises. well, what, because let's see, sorry first imported theory. what interpretation is the first to release the soviet union yes, the decrees of the soviet

unions, yes, restrictions on working hours, all social benefits, that is, for the first time in the soviet union, social modernization, advancing advice. listen, you are now quoting late soviet works. appeared in the soviet of the union under so to speak, only in the thirties the weekend was one day off in america - it was generally not a concept in america an eight-hour working day, with two days off appeared in the nineteenth century for whom well, how for whom for enterprises? no why for her so what's the point? to whom, as a free education, is it at all, who came up with the fight against well, in our country, well, it’s real that there is a zhimsky struggle. well, of course, free medicine. well, how can you deny it? we have extended so much. because of what the west remained, it became forced to enter into another system of social contracts. oh well, listen to this here, generally a separate, as it were, song. this is what acknowledges. the west

recognizes this pressure of the soviet union, in general, says the west where it recognizes. he admits this, who exactly no one can recognize. specifically , this is precisely why he was so scary that a red steamer once appeared when they took the social- well, you come from. russia was loaded onto a ship and sent back. what is the twenties? even these were, well led with provision. it was a response to the challenge of the soviet soviet bans on reds who were why the unfortunate einstein could not get a work permit in america due to the fact that the first wife seemed to be related to the social democrats. why is it so different? yes, because they were, just not a second time. what kind of imported theory of disbelief in russia said believe that backward countries, that the germans will fly by will lead ours but this is vladimir ilyevich. ulyanov lenin said vladimir ulyanov lenin is the economy they introduced, what it was. which sounds ended the development of the theory at a fairly early stage that is why this dead prison.

there was no need for any dead. find me at least one other living theory that is now surviving at least one theory of today. here is the 19th century , some one political theory that built the state won. and lived oh what can i say, at least one listen, i can say again, this is a dispute, probably for 2 hours on each side. i once again affirm that there was even more than that, the main and main dispute there is the same trotsky, who, by the way, built the red, in addition to trotsky that there were no other people there were three, especially purges. by the way, the soviet government condemned and, as they say, it is known that he lost simply in the internal struggle, until the whole case was sent. yes, and so on. now, if it were ugly to say so, there would be to ask , who, by the way, on which the marxists of the whole world are now equating, not with the fact that we have a communist part, that's, uh, that's all, the american leadership is defending the communists. i want

to say that, firstly, you cannot go around any river twice. secondly, i have serious claims related precisely to the fact that at the very beginning they actually related to their russian history to what is happening here as a personal something secondary, and at the end also to something secondary, because when oil revenues appeared, okay there from the first part now we will argue, it turns out that we had constructivism. well, what wasn't? well, of course, after the civil war , a wonderful invention. well, because, well, it’s like no, because we don’t have a cheerful civil war, in general, in in principle, it does not mean to us that it was needed, of course. well, lenin wrote to turn the imperialist war into a civilian pay. well, the plan was different in general, initially somehow different. this is written classic classic mussolini was written the same. this was the general approach of the european social democracy of that time, it was just an idea borrowed, only the problem occurred

was that the imperialist war had not been turned into a civil war. as it is not, when the civil war began immediately. yes, not immediately at first, february began this year, from which we came a disgrace. well , february ended up with you having a revolution. and then what happened to you on the fronts. yes, the recession of the country, wait. wait depending on ukraine so, by the way, in de-fatili. there, they let go to finland most of all. well the same thing was from central sorry released kerrin even it was said that the empire collapsed in february. and what about the agreement that was concluded by the americans, of course, finland, of course, in general, right? no officially lenin confessed, they all handed papers, but they all came out no, yes, they didn't go out, they arrived, they

expected, yes, yes, but they already said everything, goodbye, until now. they are independent, we took the oath did not tell the king of the king, no , that's the point

it turned out that you were moving in a land cruiser. at the moment, we are doing everything according to the schedule, good luck.