tv RIK Rossiya 24 RUSSIA24 February 14, 2023 3:30am-4:01am MSK
3:30 am
3:31 am
let's move on as soon as this very soviet union has yours. so, accordingly, the currency at the expense of oil dollars began to engage in development, they began to engage in the purchase of foreign factories, for example for the production of cars that were already backward at that time, for example, well, this, of course, is 60. well, what's the difference?
3:32 am
whether comrade stalin was such a direct communist, but he was a stalinist stalinist, he was a piece of shit - this already means a different approach, and the decision and the decision to build such factories and purchase imported goods, of course, was still made . well, here we have one secretary general who believed that something primary could be done here, and then with the help of american engineers. by the way, the imf and the world bank are not bandit and semi-legal organizations the soviet union insisted on signing documents on the conclusion, bro, in narrow agreements. listen, and one would not. you understand that a special military operation is underway now. you understand that all the weapons that we have,
3:33 am
they were created in the ussr, here are the plane tanks. this is all the result of the activities of this very shock soviet. if only they didn't exist here's the atomic bomb. here are ballistic missiles, that 's all, here, if it weren't, here but we would have full kranty now, i understand perfectly. that's even the logic what well hello, i could not understand, the russian did not lose the crimean war. why is the russian-japanese accepted for the first time there, yes , the japanese war is the role of the individual in history, because the christian war was a different personality. oh, missed technical projects. here we have extremes, then liberals, then liberals for me the result.
3:34 am
i was just talking about the fact that it happened very often. listen. even at school, when they taught soviet history textbooks, we now fighting terrible liberal textbooks. we often have soviet skodas, why they simply weren’t, i read everything that was before october of the seventeenth year. it was a prehistory, the real history of the country begins. here in october of the seventeenth year. that we were taught soviet were already driving. let's get the other side now. that is, it works. we come from the secondary side, which can not do a damn thing, well, yes, who are generally insignificant, who are incomprehensible. well , that's what he said, here's the one that's incomprehensible. how thus, he won the great patriotic war, because she took the entire secondary; the secondary invited american engineers, but for some reason beat the primary. it seems to me differently, i do not say so at all. well, how? well, you're not, absolutely secondary. in
3:35 am
this project, there was nothing primary, that everything that was invented. this was borrowed, and we took on the teachers, while everyone understood that there would be a war, and we were secondary stupid with the invitation of american engineers. they suddenly took it. or teachers. well, no, really always harder. in any case, wait. right now, just now , let's start with peter. let's deal with this, but because this is a manner of whitewashing history. it leads to nothing never then come to the modern. if you read that your country is secondary in everything, leave, well, lie down and die. actually. lenin, you offered to do this, for some reason refused to leave. well, he left, no , when everything was ready for him. and who returned, listen, well, let's go here, it's really very important. here in this situation and don't jump on me again. this is a piece of
3:36 am
the history of great russia, the dualism of our society now. well, of course it does. here a person came to me a specialist in poland and then i read from him what it turns out. when people like solovyov talk about the existence of the ukrainian people, it is clear that they are still mocking them, saying that mahmud is a good name for artyom with a bad one, because he diverges from the red tradition. why does he say so? and, because he's not russian. and if you didn't beat, you are the enemy of the russian people the little man who was standing opposite here and was afraid to say it to my face. this is generally a division into whites and more reds. now to the back. he says, you see, i am an enemy of the russian people, because do not share it beat the khantisemical. and by the way, was he an adviser to medinsky? these are the ones we have in power, too, you know, and well, friends
3:37 am
of the russian people for 10 years, it remains to wait for the main friend of the russian people. i say, this is a red, white confrontation. yes, you need to accept white, you need symbiotic, they pissed away whites at one time, because like this treated everyone and the people. i also have a clean bone. ukrainian surname uh, well , this, by the way, is in the soviet national pillow, but uh, listen here, in fact, it is really very important. in my opinion, to understand that what is relevant now, so as not to try to enter the same river a second time , but how interesting it is to see what we have here, i will still say such a thing, i said that i am an enemy, because i allow criticize the deputies and disagree with them. yes, i just want to say. that something, something that yevgeny yanych said how answer yes? how how to answer how not to answer? in fact, that's the whole
3:38 am
point. now, if we talk about how to respond, before admitting that we live in reality, it’s not a direct war to start at least with a statement of this fact. we do not live in a state of international law. and in a state of indirect war, but it must be said. this is really a doctrinal statement, i agree, and then start to outline the wounds, what is possible, what is not possible, and at first i am in the usual order, because there are no other agreements. but how with no one yet. and then the situation will be completely different. and by the way, saying that evgeny angela is answering no answer, of course, he is answering. they think this, in fact, that they have come up with a very cunning scheme. and by the way, we are still talking. well, how is it? yeah, in itself , the statement that we are also entering into an indirect war will already be a serious step. then within the framework of this and answer. despite the fact that time is short, at first the prologue about seymour, or what is it called? but i agree that
3:39 am
the americans are proud of what they blew up and they wanted everyone to know and give a signal to the question of who leaked it to him and why it was to him because, if not published by the mouth. or another newspaper, this is already a reason for investigation. and then some hersh, published something there , although his information did not go unnoticed, they are proud of themselves, therefore they gave this leak, the second e about dogmatic marxism, as soon as marxism becomes dogmatic, he dies, when he came to soviet russia this even just to russia, he was not dogmatic. he became he only under mikhail andreyevich suslov, and then this withering away began, and in russia it developed, just the same book, pamphlet questions of leninism and so on, but i am from your high dispute. did christ own his clothes, uh, after all, to m-th specifics , listen, well today, an interesting event , petr siart, the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, flew to minsk and every news of his
3:40 am
statements i leaf through several agencies, because it’s hard to believe it for all orban positions. well, first of all, they were ready. they did art training here on the eve they said that he also said that corrupt officials settled in the parliament, the authority of the european parliament is zero or tends to zero further rebuff to the slovaks that the slovaks ran into the hungarians said that they want to recreate their empire and are waiting for putin's victory to chop off slovakia and all other neighbors their territories, but the most interesting thing, but you can say here and called to russia. but what did he do in belarus? it’s just that he didn’t just come and say that he wants peace and hungary believes that there is no need to pump up ukraine weapons. uh, pumping guns is the death of people. and we are against the death of people , we need to talk about peace, this is his, but the agenda, but secondly, he and the minister of foreign affairs of belarus, who are under eu sanctions, are now discussing new sanctions
3:41 am
against our country. and so, together with sergei oleinik, he signed a program plan, more precisely, cooperation between hungary and the republic of belarus for 23 years. the country is a member of the eu and a member of nato, further they declared great ties, development prospects and similar views on very many political problems, including the ukrainian one and, finally, something that we have never heard from european politicians at all. not you. not not us, not you for the last quarter of a century. he said that we did not discuss the political agenda in belarus at all, because this was not the purpose of my visa, that is, it was demanded below everyone. and you discussed there some next sufferer there or someone else. well , in fact, this is a continuation of the orban line. what is behind this? well, firstly, the fact that orban is his minister of foreign affairs, very brave people, and secondly. well, unfortunately, we are in hungary in hungarian we dream, but there are quite a few
3:42 am
they are not alone. this is a whole movement of hungary in general, europe is fragmenting, to say the least, and these are the statements of duda that opposed poland germany france this position of hungary, and we see the austrians and slovenes very close to it. look what the croats have been saying lately, by the way, norman has made moves. and this suggests that we must continue to work with europe, no matter how much it is hard work hard work, but at the same time about the effectiveness of certain places. well, of course, some supporters of zelensky will say that putin's agent is paid for. well, it’s clear that this is nonsense, here we are comparing hungary from which i didn’t expect such behavior, in general, no one in my life said hungary with its tradition. here nikolai pavlovich, before losing the crimean war, suppressed the hungarian liberation revolution against austria, which we then stabbed in the back. all e,
3:43 am
planted so during the crimean war in hungary , which remembers the fifty-sixth year anti-soviet slogans, as a young activist went to power. here he, his entourage, is pursuing such a policy, because they do not want to increase the role of russia in europe about the russians. no, of course, they protect their national interests near slovakia, where pro-russian sentiments are much more than slovakia connected by great ties with russia there and through gazprom want, and they have leadership, like completely different people. not just another one. along with poland , a hub for supplying kiev weapons has been created. uh, weapons repair mode, equipment and so on. this suggests that there is a future for european politicians; the body simply protects its national interests. what is wrong, maybe russian policy. here's exactly what not to do. it pumps someone up
3:44 am
with money and believes in all the power of a politician. there are a lot of taxes, russia pumped money to hungary. i think at times, if an order of magnitude less than it was with ukraine, where everyone betrayed and those who were at one time on this money. let's just say that the purchased ones were kept, then they turned out to be either ineffective or betrayed russia if only no one pumped up the second moment, that's all or political technologies, how many we are from your various uh, well, you probably heard political strategists listen, yes, we will promote anyone. yes, we will come, yes, we are in central central asia. yes, we have such experience. i have 150 election campaigns behind me. i did an internship at harvard somewhere else. we'll do it. and what they did, therefore , not the omnipotence of money and not the omnipotence of political technologies, but the exact knowledge of the countries with which we employees are absolutely correct, and understanding of the technical processes that
3:45 am
take place there and the training of specialists, but this is news here. this is not 100% tied to a special military operation. it has been difficult for many years. now, if we are talking about the front, everything must be done quickly there. but what we are discussing is whether these are high mothers or specifically here is the relationship with hungary. this is absolutely what will be calculated for many years, we will not correct those last 30 years in half a year in 3 months we will not have specialists in hungary and the czech republic within two years if we they were not prepared for the previous 10, but, nevertheless, europe is so everything now you what kind of marx will you start arguing? i just wanted to say that and the statement. d. and what to do now orban - it still gives hope for our normal relations with europe, as karen georgievich said, anyway , we will have them, we will not
3:46 am
have the atlantic ocean to the west of brest or to the south west of kaliningrad. well, it’s interesting that belarus is becoming a diplomatic hub, but we were like that for a while back on the other side. perhaps this is also a way to pull it out of here, as it were, maybe , but i'm through the hungarian channel. yes, orban is not a pompeo, after all, these are such attempts that there will be no doubt about it. they are now advertising. after it, we will continue with the new composition. on the russia friendship channel but did not forgive chaliapin's criticism. can you really be arrogant? kostya , choke on your pate over there today at 21:20. the nazi kiev regime clearly
3:47 am
indicates the main goal of destroying the russians , even the plan to kill there is 5,000 people a day for this they ask in the west weapons. tomorrow there is another meeting in the format rammstein here cruelly jokes that this is a ufo that is, he asks for funds to be given to him. it's not even discussed at all. that
3:48 am
is, it is not necessary, there is a zelensky deal being heated. part of this deal, he substitutes souls, yes, and the west supplies weapons in the history of ukraine of what remains of it. well, like atlantis, there is no longer a person who destroyed the ukrainians . how many will they lay down? how many of them have already died is not important, the weapon, after all, he said very honestly, the former leader is amazing human. but i have stated here in the us what do you know the brave ukrainian people are doing the kind of dirty work that we never wanted to do here us that's why you, uh, that's why we should continue
3:49 am
to support you in every possible way with whatever we can be ammunition weapons , intelligence and so on. i've criticized the banbiden president to some extent for being too slow to deliver weapons and being undesirable and unwilling to provide certain types of weapons, because i'm interested in your opinion. i believe that we should provide ukraine with, for example, attack complexes , because it would be very useful to give you the ability to disable iranian drone launch sites in crimea and i think that the very notion that we forbid you from striking russian territory is simply not makes no sense. uh, you know, the only thing that worries me is whether we are providing technology that the russians can capture and pass on to the chinese and iranians. so in this case , this is the only thing that could cause me worry know i guess we should. due diligence to make sure the technology can't fall into the wrong hands, and we certainly expect you to do everything you can to ensure this, but i don't see any reason not
3:50 am
to supply the atoms complex. you can strike at russia using any type of weapons. well, look at this ringer. bastard. lexus, our pranksters vovan and lexus brilliantly bred, generally boys. well, wonderful smart thin charming are bought over and over again. you are an idiot, i thought what he says with poroshenko raises the question. they directly declare that they are enemies, they directly declare that they are with us yes, fuck them already and that's all and calm down, pull this bastard out to separate all this of the american people and punish. they are setting up the american people. do you think that zelensky and the nazis represent the ukrainian people, it is no coincidence that one ukrainian military man remade the fairy tale about robin hood to you . it really seems to me that robin hood works at the atm because he takes trips to the rich and distributes them to the poor. not you argue, and of course, stoltenberg brought
3:51 am
the discussion into question. and if at all at least some sense, because at least leave a crumb. from ukraine, the emphasis should be on when this war will end one way or another. we will have to ensure that ukraine is able to resist and defend itself, because what we have seen since 2014. so it is that ukraine was not able to deter the second attack. russia illegally entered and annexed crimea and then weeks or months later. after that, she entered east, and then we got a war that faded and flared over the years until a full-scale invasion took place now we need to be able to strengthen ukraine support for training and will need to strive for a longer-term transformation and transition of ukrainian forces from soviet,
3:52 am
doctrine, equipment, which still makes up the majority of their armed forces , in order to increase their interoperability with nato allies so that ukraine will be able to deter the subsequent aggression so wet it to the end, and then take on these, because this bastard is being let out. this circle of nazis is amazing. here nothing changes. by the way, if you don’t know, then, uh, kulibai explained to us, we didn’t know who created russia. now you will finally find out, if earlier russia as an empire decided the fate of ukraine from europe then now ukraine as part of europe will decide the fate of the russian empire, then what we are talking about, in fact, is
3:53 am
300 years of history to turn upside down. i spoke to one person a little shocked his. well, i bluntly said the empire was created by the french, germans and ukrainians. and now we need to decide together. what to do with her next is for our viewers, just an intellectual reflection, please. and why kievan rus and not ukrainian schmuck. it was he who took the dog and his family abroad. yes it is clear. so how is it? a dog with a family abroad continues to be more important than life to ukraine or ukrainians do not leave, but took the dog out. and how? well, probably
3:54 am
not all ukrainians do well with dogs. not all of them come on, yes i do i really don't understood, to be honest, but if the ukrainians created the russian empire. come on, let's say, let's say today ukrainian , then why are you unhappy then, why are you fighting against it, but your consciousness should be proud. yes, i just look now how they easily decide there, then the ukrainian is russian. i got completely confused when the metropolitan museum in new york da announced aivazovsky and kuindzhida as ukrainian artists. e. well, an armenian. and the greek has not already indicated, for example? well, according to this logic, by the way, trotsky is a ukrainian absolutely zaher mazov yes world great ukrainian doubts of the night ukrainian writers, there is no show that they are not called ukrainian the most interesting yes, i have one thing and immediately an article is published in the times, where it means they write everything ukraine refuses russian composers
3:55 am
tchaikovsky and prokofiev i look at map and i think there are, well, a few. e , well, well, less than a hundred meters, and you are kilometers from the place where kuindzhi was born, a native of donbass kuindzhi yes, and an expression from donbass prokofiev by what principle do they determine which of them uh, ukrainian? well, apparently, because you know, as in a joke dacha, as in a joke yes, my son , i'm running, what are you masquerading? yes? yes, aivazovsky is on the muscovites, which means that they are all ukrainians tchaikovsky on the muscovites of his french mountain. well, they generally prove it, yes, yes. you remember how yushchenko argued that tchaikovsky was ukrainians, because chaika yes, that's all, and that was enough. but i never said that chekhov chekhov is a great poet. do not confuse with the great. by the way, they are now destroying chekhov's work at the same time yes they continue to prove us right
3:56 am
that we are fighting nazism today. uh, ukrainian nazis, uh, ruined it. well, probably the highest monument left in ukraine-controlled. uh, to the soviet soldiers the liberator of ivano-frankivsk in the lviv region on the highway lviv, ivano-frankivsk, near the old village, and she cursed him. uh, the fighters of the first ukrainian front, which liberated ukraine from the nazis, joyfully jump. i have a question. tomorrow zelensky will come to auschwitz again and will talk about how ukrainians are. released auschwitz is the first ukrainian front, why are you lying about its monuments if they are ukrainians today, the ivano-frankivsk region in the city of bonner. well, as we assumed , the destruction of the tombstone of vatutin in kiev, it followed on already a chain reaction, at least the grave. didn't touch. yes, today in the city of bondar in the french region they crushed the tomb memory of the hero of the soviet union, e., koryakov alexander
3:57 am
koryakov, who died freeing the village of votrov. why are you digging there? we're going to give him the title of the righteous of the world, is a witness. so he doesn’t want to talk about it, how old we were then, 17. there was one valuable weapon in the family. the relic was raised, you said you would return it.
3:59 am
4:00 am
at it, he says yes. yes, of course, of course, the smell is created by the fuse of the nazi and ukraine happily said, as they say, you are fascists and so on they say, yes, yes, well, i understand. they are still under the cap , that's the thing they get along with. this is a ukrainian freed from the svents. we sort of fought against the nazis. yes, so we were told, now the modern ukrainian will disappear. upa never knew, and therefore, in general, they always zigzagged and so on and served the faith and truth of the nazi mary, mind you, as their weapon. as for the nazi nuts, but note that the scandal causes. yes no zigzag, no nazis, no demolition of the monument to the liberators, the scandal in germany is terrible, it has been standing for 2 days already. it's just that i'm amazed at the fact that in general the public state radio yes called procommen.
15 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Russia-24 Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on