it will be the honest detective.

but it's best to check. we agreed that now both moldova and georgia need it. this is our complete environment. in

general, to finish us off, what is called here, how to remove those possible pieces from my point of view to us in europe. of course, it is necessary to force the movement there further to odessa to unite. naturally. in general, in short, a military problem, but i think that leaving ukraine is also my position, that you are ready to solve it. just a solution to this problem, but a broader one, besides now that they 2% decided. it's minimum. previously, 2% was the great goal that germany had to achieve. now 2% is the minimum. so we need to go to four percent. and maybe some more social problems, social issues. social programs

for children. we live in wartime. now they are setting up biden too. now i think he is being tuned in, or rather, he is being tuned in that in general he is practically a wartime president. who are also preparing for war with the aggressor, so that immediately with two aggressors, one in europe, the other in the east. well, in general, ruza, in fact, and , of course, there is another factor that will answer for the ball about the ball, which indicates that the balls, which indicate that in general for the united states now it is important to do this and undermine the northern streams it fits in very well here, so that there are no relations between us and europe. no return to any kind of relationship a year ago, especially 5 years ago. very serious just military confrontation. that should be it then, it's a regulated conflict for the states, it 's quite so to speak, but a reasonable thing

that gives them the opportunity to re -switch the effort to focus on uh, in an easterly direction. now here's the request. they will defend the philippines, we will be there , the chinese are some kind of philippine patrol ship, allegedly irradiated with a laser. in general , in short, we will defend our ally more than other allies who could, like the nato bloc in general, deter china, as nato should deter us as an organization. everyone says the atlantic treaty, there are no factors. another very important thing is that the americans were late. that's what we have to give credit to our leadership. maybe we did not have time to rebuild something in our economy, there is finance. well, what we managed to do was switch to a new weapons program. we started it much earlier. here, the united states on the thirtieth of january announced that they had. so, she left the karelian like that. it's, uh, a hypersonic missile. well, she didn’t

get off, then she doesn’t say anything more twice. before. she did not go and launched her blowjob , the check was also carried out somehow. and then here she flew and there was no silence. such bravura is that she knocked something out there , shot down something, or well, there is no b21 program on which they are calculated superbomber. nobody will catch him. she, too, now, in my opinion, there are five samples. this is in general, which they so showed them that they exist, supposedly this machine, but the program must also end. there by the twenty-seventh year. they accelerated it, aircraft carriers, two new aircraft carriers, they are building, well, it was supposed to come down in december. e jfk hasn't come down yet, that is, but i'm sure that the american military-industrial complexes in general are the american economy. it can speed up what it can do, so

to speak, speed up the military program. she just needs the military-industrial complex. we must believe that this is for a long time, that this funding will be. yes, and that's why then they quickly do it in the second world war, they doubled the gdp, but so far they are not ready for this, therefore, here is the scenario for the next war. let's say. here in the foreseeable perspective, i would say yes. it is possible, like any scenario, it must be discussed, but it is less real than the scenario that they will put pressure on our inner ones and, of course, will try to pull it out. this rod listened to you with great interest. in fact, andrey says what you are saying, it sounds like what dmitry says they are ready ideologically not ready material technical now

a war is starting for allies and industrial potential, because we started to deal with it earlier. well, look, after all, until several of the largest workshops in the world expressed their attitude. if we manage to include in this war with nato on our side. three largest workshops in the world, then the geopolitical alignment will be completely different, the americans are afraid of the formation of a third nuclear center if they go with us.

if unique patterns of expression come with us, in particular, then the combined power of russia belarus iran north korea china in the production of modern weapons exceed all the potential capabilities of the country they simply will have nowhere to take and do something. and in fact, the war will now start precisely for this diplomatic issue . and here, i still do not see that we have taken the steps that are necessary. right here. so far, i do not see any decisiveness in the divisions here every year. why do i come to implement the agreements that were concluded between putin regularly. no, this is not a hint. i have not yet heard from us here is such

a wording. it is from russia where can i say that the guys have gone geopolitical rift? because the task is not to destroy russia, but the task of repeating colonization is not the western world, after trying to destroy us with the belarusian brothers, will take on iran north korea and the main goal is china well, the task is to prevent the consolidation of the eurasian massif. and there, china, iran, korea, and so on, india, and the task is not entirely different, so it was in the fortieth year. i believe that we must take several important steps diplomatically. first, we must impose sanctions against the united states of america for disrupting the northern streams. at the same time , demonstrative and as tough as possible in response to the like heil, and we must impose sanctions. against industries specifically people of military

structures, that is, it will directly play a tough mirror. so what, it will be oh, it will be, firstly, what will happen, how it will be, at least it will mean that we do not just admit that the americans did it, but we, if you like, mirror when they sent our diplomats brought in sans without any investigation without just believing that russian high-likes did it. here we can understand the second very important point. we must initiate these security issue on the lifting of sanctions against north korea we must express our attitude towards north korea and sent there, by the way, if possible , a giant humanitarian for what sanctions are needed on north korea imposed non-proliferation sanctions for violating the agreement to the non-proliferation treaty of 68,

again, exactly so no. the fact is that , of course, they came out earlier to us. they officially exited following the procedure. do you understand, yes, what if now that's how we lift sanctions? yes, i actually missed it in this regard further, that they are up to another partner china, in this regard , in the korean issue, you should always skip a period. china i think that we can read ahead here, but it’s more important for us to release together to consider that if we do this now, ukraine will be given nuclear weapons naively, because we see that they will give ukraine nuclear weapons sooner or later . they will say that before the ukrainians did it themselves. and that they have the technology, everything and information training, they are still afraid that they will sell something. yes they will sell for sure. whether they are afraid of this , the ukrainians will sell. yes, it's anecdotal. they

are afraid that the ukrainians will sell us instead of throwing at us. it is so that they are afraid of this, just do not need to be afraid at all. it's too much. we are still in heaven. they will just die. i think if we analyze the flow of information in general, we analyze the analytical materials of the statements of our opponents. that's what happens, i personally have two such impressions about their current state. the first impression is that they are scared and the second the impression is that they did not really decide. what to do next, what strategies there absolutely. definitely not, and it very much depends on how the situation on the ground develops, exclusively. where do these impressions come from? here, we, let’s agree more gently here with dmitry gennadievich when he said that here the choice is already in that and we’ll just deliver a preemptive strike in order to deprive the enemy of his advantage in the future, or we’ll let

him hit us and it’s still a blow will be inflicted if we honor the statement of one of the most my favorite characters are western panopticon. we are this josep borel. he recently stated bluntly. he says, well, he says, we saw we gave tanks, no third world war began. that's what worries them. they are afraid that there will be a direct clash with us. they do not treat this as part of their plan, which they are now ready for it. they are trying to ask us about it, they are afraid of it, therefore, they are testing the ground every time, and they are already in plain text. they say we tested the soil, saw that there was no answer we are not waiting in this case. well, we handed over the tanks. and those who criticized us for the fact that we handed over tanks saw that they swallowed it, that they never reacted to it, the next step will be what ens stoltenberg openly talks about. a month ago, this man said verbatim the following. a month ago, he said that we

are not in conflict with russia as nato is due to the fact that our military personnel are not there. there are no our planes , 4 weeks have passed; there is stoltenberg. the same person. says what will be ours planes in ukraine does not mean that we are in conflict with russia because there will not be our pilots, but ukrainian ones, but then it will be that our pilots are already there, well, their names, and there or they have an even date of birth . here, as if odd then, then you will know that we are in direct opposition to this border. we are deadlocked here if we continue in this way, because this line will advance without, of course, and there are two options with mine. in terms of either do so, to supply these weapons, equipment and so on, there was physically no one else, so even they wanted to put ukraine there . well, then the question will arise after ukraine, there will be the baltic states, poland and other states that my colleagues listed, and they are unlikely to stop in ukraine. ukraine now this is

just the territory on which it is even used, uh, not a mercenary state. this is the avatar of the state. this is, uh, a simulation of a state that doesn't really exist and that territory is being used for in order to bring mercenaries there, in equipment , money, anything, in order to , uh, overstrain russia and contain russia in this region. boras said one more phrase that i cannot ignore and our viewers also need to cheer up and the person does not change his traditions. he said verbatim the following he said, unfortunately. in africa, there is still a mood of anti-colonialism, and in latin america, anti-imperialism, that is , colleagues in africa have not completed driving america's colleagues so far instead of succumbing to the joys and colonialism of imperialism to all the joys

of opportunity and quirks that await them. they are still somewhat negative about it. and these are the theses that he has. here we can see two positions here, one is what the barrel is talking about, the second. here is a general of miles, he says, some absolutely opposite things. if we compare them with the position, let's say. uh, a hair dryer that says miles, he says russia has already suffered, strategic operational and tactical defeat to him very often we read articles. here it comes out like this. uh, a review article that explains at length how lucky the west is that yi has already lost as of today. yeah, i'm uh, trying to understand one thing. here a year has passed. uh, firstly, we, of course, are very styled, that if they really assumed that they would throw all their resources into confronting russia, we should destroy them in a week or a month and a half there , this indicates that they have a very high opinion of us.

well, and then far enough from reality from physically impossible, but that after a year of what we control and four new regions entered into our composition, that not one of the nine existing and , apparently, the tenth next package of sanctions had no effect and did not achieve the result that they also put the fact that russia is not in any isolation, which , because of this, prompts them to think that russia for some reason suffered a defeat somewhere. i am sure that they are well aware that this is not really the case and thus decide two the only task is to feed this information to our electorate all the time, that everything is not in vain, that we have a cunning plan. we are moving along the planned trajectory, we will definitely achieve our goal, and the second thing in this regard is quite likely, as it seems to me, that they have already mentally, at least, got used to the fact that they will definitely not see these four regions. apparently. uh, the number of these regions will be much larger and they are preparing

a scenario for themselves, which they will distribute through the media in their countries in the third world in order to prove that in fact russia did not win. yes, they will say, russia has taken seven regions, but which regions are these or the 10th region? what will take over the moon? yes? they said, they are there nato, they said you break it, how they themselves attribute statements to us every time, then they fight with it for a long time. i promised to come to the table. yes, this is it. apparently it will be their position in order to build their strategy after that, but if we read what she says, let's say that she is hilla. i agree with my colleagues absolutely in the fact that how they analyzed the article, she says there for a long time why it is necessary to oppose russia now, and then the article actually ends with the following it says, well, only 34 countries have imposed sanctions on russia

the rest of the countries are not that they do not want to impose sanctions directly russian narratives are accepted in these countries. unlike the us narratives, the us failed western countries. they failed to convey their position to the global south. how to speak there? and what of this, it is possible to induce to think that russia is not wins or that we are not successful in all the lines they wanted, in principle, no result has developed. i would like to conclude here at one more point. of course, i tragically endure the fact that our colleagues at alma mater and vladimir have the opportunity to work in the polish foreign ministry , but i want to reassure everyone over the past 10 years. this is the fourth time i'm reading this news, which is all uh, means polish diplomats who graduated from nagimo. uh, fired from the ministry of foreign affairs, it happens every one and a half or two years, then they, apparently, secretly return there, or something else i can say, just to us for us. this is good.

that is, more will be left without normal diplomats, at least qualified and professional, so this is their business, but i was interested in another statement from the outside. uh, our uh enemies. here is the head of the gur, which means i can’t remember the comrade’s last name now, he announced the following. he says that we have people surrounded by the president of russia who are already cooperating with us. of course, they do not do this out of warm feelings. ukraine a, because they worry about their money, because they worry. he’s in the future, of course, uh, well, it’s all ridiculous that there is a guru of this magnitude or some kind of operation there, yes, but he doesn’t know that we know that zelensky handed over a list of these people to putin but what i want to draw attention to . here. here, of course, with the ukrainian authorities. i don't think that people there somehow contact, but the thesis itself. it seems that sergey

vyacheslavrov said things in the state duma. he says we hear voices both inside the country and from those who left, because they are against the special operation that they are against this policy, but in reality these people and they are talking all the time, what they are talking about, you promised us that you will improve our well-being, that we will live better. and what have you done, you have limited the opportunities for the development of russia, but here it is very important to distinguish the well-being of these specific people. these are the prospects that our country has, because sergei viktorovich spoke about this, which, of course, worries them very much, that their personal comfort has declined over this period, but not that the vast majority of our entire population. i am sure that he will never in his life prefer this zone of exceptional consumer comfort to the fact that our country can develop freely and be an absolutely independent country with sovereignty that fulfills the tasks set for itself.

another alternative guarantees its citizens security, we simply do not have, and these are their hopes. i'm all the time every time the heroic ones change tirades that we are now defending this brave city there, heroic warriors are fighting and as soon as this city is lost for three or four days, everything that you hear on these youtube channels is preparing a conspiracy against putin. all. now, as soon as the city is lost, what is now plotting against putin. i want you to know the whole country at the moment for its president before the start of the special operation, people could have a different attitude. who could justifiably be unhappy. there, i do not know the economic policy of someone could in social issues don't arrange shots, anything at all today for us. for everyone, it doesn't matter. our whole country today is for the president and never in our lives will we prefer this comfort zone that you are trying to impose on us as slaves, because to be free and strive for our future,

which we deserve. ah, well, there are several aspects that i would like to note. and about the sanction. yes, i have strong desires to prohibit all ships that are insured by the company from entering at all to pass through our water. well everyone a you can introduce some secondary sanctions on the same topic. well, and so on, for example , drowning, uh, this is an excess, different and not good . this is the next stage, but i would like to note two circumstances from those that have already been touched upon. imagine, this first was correctly noted, but they may not be able to launch industrialization now. even the united states of america, for a banal reason, because the financial system does not allow us to start industrialization. and they have something in general they can launch vk but you will

forgive me, of course, but the level of their corruption. we are children in comparison with him, just, well, absolutely children, yes, it’s a shame now for this reason for this reason. here we are, as you would say. yes, how many global military programs they have implemented over the past 20 years, and if you think that they will get better now, it will get worse, but there will be one more thing, if that kind of money goes, the military industrial kit. yes , why do they have to endure various idiots washington and this maza says, yes, in moscow the washington conspiracy is impossible, because against whom they want to conspire so they start talking. read there is such a wonderful detective. we even shot a film about it 7 days in august american,

which 3 days of the condor blows. we have a tv movie about how to organize. this is a detective, written in the sixty-first year at the same time as the general's law. yes, how easy it is to implement, the united states of america means, and now i wrote the second thing. well just need to know how to tv movie. yes i i remember ivanov playing senator. i just remember this scene, well, it doesn't matter. thing, the second i'm not a specialist in diplomacy. i don’t understand anything about it at all, but i understand the elites a little in the eighteenth nineteenth first half of the 20th century, diplomacy was the lot of aristocrats, and then there was also a revolution of managers and as a result today,

and we have people who work as presidents, prime ministers, deputies bunch of psychology. well, well, let's say a little like this with a polish cattle accent. and they are these all people are more than anything else afraid that their puppeteers well, the real elites were expelled, because they are not hereditary elites and for them losses. here they are sitting at the table today and giving interviews. and tomorrow and what will be kicked out and they will not be able to do it. remember there was such a bike, which may or may not be true, that when voloshin set up, then, uh, the family team for the elections, or voloshin or someone else, he uttered a phrase. if i had said this for the sixth year, if you lose, you will never be fly business class.

here, for them, this is a real threat, and for this reason, every time they say something about theirs, what their lita is, voloshin set them up, but those people who, when they say something, they very often say, do not us, neither ukraine nor our voters. and they say, that's why it is very important for that very elite of theirs, which they are much more afraid of putin and the last blunder that was made. this performance of the bytes. the middle east is dangerous in that

it brings other countries together. naya design as long as it satisfies us interests. he attacked serbia and montenegro without permission from the un and caused a huge disaster. we were among the first countries to feel this american democracy, war is business, and business is good. this is the reality we are dealing with fascism. how old am i? i’m saying severe, i’ve been put up for two weeks already , i saw this sign of generals with difficulties as a speaker of the federation council

. i spoke with many experts who listened to and read this speech there, and they all unanimously, which experts on american political culture, they all said in one voice that there was a feeling that biden was trying to make a conceptual speech that would be an alternative to the industrialization plan. now the americans have a plan , we note that within the framework of this plan, no matter how ukraine, no war can be ruled out. well, it's just that this whole part of the political elite, the liberal ones. she just throws off of course this plan will not be implemented.