i spoke with many experts who heard and read this speech there. and they are all with one voice. well, who are experts on american political culture. they all unanimously said that there was a feeling that they were trying to make a conceptual speech to biden , which would be an alternative to the industrialization plan, august, now the americans have a plan for the industrialization of august , we note that within the framework of this plan, as if no ukraine, no war would be can't , it's out of the question. well, that's just all this is part of the political elite, liberal. she simply throws off of course , these plans will be implemented , these individual ones will not be able to, but for the liberal

elite. they wanted to cheat their alternative plan and nothing came of it. it is for this reason that biden did not say that he would run for another term, because everyone understood this no. anna and so, therefore, the key question is these people, who, from the point of view of their real capabilities. they might as well be able to lead there, uh, planes, missiles or there by germany, by the way, germany and western europe are also supposed to be colonized, because it's not august. and this is the wild field. yes, this is the wild field, and so, but these people here they can be fired at any second. they know this and this horror hangs over them for this reason. but, by the way, if this happens, they are fired, then the very people with whom we can talk will appear. here is the most. well, such

a conditional american aristocracy will not appear anywhere. so they ride camels, in short, people, yes, who are there 50 years ago delegated their direct control. from what moment will the reptilians go there will be no reptilians. no, i love conspiracy theories, but there are two points here. here, i'm a classic sterilizer for you now. here, look, i 'll show you now, and the classic version that we are talking about, we are managers. and how does he explain where his wife got the money from to the ambassador? it is reported that your family is connected with russia that your wife owns a stake in the indian company infos. they work in moscow, they have an office there, they have an account in alpha bank. why do you advise others what do you not keep to yourself? it's not,

i'm an elected politician, unlike my wife. let's talk about what i am responsible for, she is not, but you, as a representative of the state. you are asking taxpayers to pay for the support of ukraine, you are asking to give their homes to ukrainian refugees. and your family may well receive income from the putin regime no, i don’t think so, and as i said, the affairs of the company concern only the company itself. we have imposed serious sanctions and all the companies for which we are responsible comply with them sends, thereby a tough message to putin for his aggression. do you know what infos company is. i don't i have no idea and have nothing to do with this company by the minister. here is a classic manager. but if you look at the tag, it's the next generation. we have passed this stage, it is still the same thing. she is just a representative

of a completely different generation. it is that there are now new elites who do not need the puppet masters to provide them with uh, well-being by secret transfers of money or the elimination of schemes they passed when the structure internet popularity fundraising makes it possible to raise enough money and don't care that you had a puppeteer, a generation of these green populists has come, who do not care at all at some time. they are in italy, er, they became mayors, then this party of bushes appeared. they fall apart quickly. they are not controlled, they are chaotic, but this is a new generation of irresponsible people who have come into politics. they don't even have a managerial level of responsibility. and it's scary they are chosen only with one provided if they don't lead don't work that shouldn't be a manager. they they must be absolutely right. they must be

polite, cheerfully crazy and they collect their own up to twenty percent. and this is the worst. this is coming the new generation is absolutely irresponsible, because the managers answered at least to someone. the privy councilor managed at least someone of these, who generally do not give a damn about everything for them, the whole world is in dust. and this is the terrible michal and nothing, this new generation that has grown up, i do not agree in many ways raised, quarrels, if you look, here is the same. well, hello, the same sandu ugu who is generally not in the subject in anything in anything, but she nevertheless really does not want to lose her position. they all really don't want to. they don't think about it that way at all. for them, it's a joke. they understand well, they come to positions that are not for long. for them, there is no value in being in a position for a long time; for them, the fact that it has flown into this position has been and it's cool. this is a different

type of thinking - this is a fake type of thinking. this no. there is no future, no past, biographies are now a joke. there are likes. now such people cannot lead the war queer in the process of transgender transition. these are not people. not easy. well, whether or not such people can plunge the planet into war zelensky is just one of them who creates the conditions. yes, zelensky is a typical representative of this wave, which has no understanding, no responsibility. he won't do anything else. it comes solely from reflex gathering. likes next. i agree, maybe it is no more, but if we go to war, we will not pass. we must be people who are responsible, otherwise the war is impossible. otherwise, one cannot parallel responsibility. no. now no one ever stoltenberg is responsible no. a clown in kiev who is not also

responsible, which i am ready to say, i only do not decide anything, but i am ready, i have his union urban. he carries. responsibility does not decide no. you are talking about responsible politicians. we say who is responsible for the war hmm these all the people who call, who's there for a mile is responsible at all, don't care. and by the way, these people can't really be industrialists in a world that says that ukraine has painful superiority. ingenuity is, well, to say anything, because the main thing is to collect likes. this is the worst thing, because likes do not cancel a nuclear war. who was going to call on his colleague in china if he was ordered by the president, the supreme commander. yes, he is even cool when a traitor is in charge. yes. he said it

that by this moment the decline of america has learned to them when people say that there is no president if i like his last name. and this is the end, this is the end, when you fulfill or fulfill the oath, wrote down whether you like or dislike the name of your president. america signed the verdict with this. well, it's real, to say the least. well, in my unenlightened view. of course, i may never have finished anything. if anything, i finished vladimir well, in fact, indeed, we are observing the military consultation of the west. it is being prepared. he gathers strength resources and, uh, preparation. it may be really belated, it may not. they may not have expected that everything will go exactly as it is fundamentally important what is happening. uh, the formation of a new

american colonialism, just colonialism turned out to be about that's all. only this time, in addition to the one outside the western world, which has already been said today, which the americans are striving to subdue. and there are also the countries of the west themselves, which, it turns out, are in the same subordinate position relative to the united states america so they can't even defend their national economic interests, let alone anything else. uh, in general, a fundamentally important point that our foreign minister sergey viktorovich lavrov raised today. he said that the concept of russia's foreign policy would be updated and said that one of the goals should be to stop the monopoly of this of the west right here we are returning. and to the very text of the concept of foreign policy - this is our key document, yes, which determines foreign policy russia and mm. it says a lot

of things, but the essence is reduced to cooperation to partnership, and apparently it's time to really change some actions. that's what was said today about, uh, wrestling. e non-western countries in the new world political space, yes, which is being formed, well, russia can be at the head of the angard, this very process of forming a new world order. this needs to be stated precisely. it is also necessary to unequivocally formulate those provisions that relate to our interaction with west. everything is quite rosy there. e things concept. it prescribes what is now and what should be from the point of view of the future in terms of foreign policy, and it spells out what international law is. yes, as far as international law in the form, uh , which implied the concept in general , exists today. this is a very big question . is there international law that

was created as a result of the great patriotic world war ii? to whom we ask this question we should ask ourselves this question, because now it must be formed this is the concept of foreign policy. well, we understand that it is not. we understand, here the question is, what will be included in this very text, and the concept? that is, as you can see, but he is not right. even all our partners say that, well, how else do they say that, like, the world based sent, yes, they canceled it, so who are we going to talk to, if he is always three countries from five countries, but we are one of those countries that fundamentally stands on the base. until now , it has kept the order that did not exist before. let's continue about

the concept of foreign policy, uh russia, which sergey viktorovich spoke today, a. well, that world doesn't exist. yes, well, no, it is already necessary to recognize it and move from the status of guardians to the status of creators and attackers, if you like, yes, those who are ready, uh, for the formation of a new world order, respectively, to do this, we need to decide on what, in fact, we we form, yes, and this definitely deserves a mention in the concept. secondly, uh, apart from the fact that we are building a polycentric world. it would be nice to decipher this case. third. oh what a very what matters is what. it was already mentioned today that if the goal of the united states of america is the colonization of the neo-colonization of uh not the west and uh, colonization in essence the european union means, uh, a great opportunity for russia to be in alliance with those who

oppose it on the approx. zma against is always weaker than the allies, no doubt. a, but this same concept is accepted for a certain period. and we must understand. you speak very deeply and accurately, but it just seems to me that we have now turned a little to the side, look. we have part of the world which gave its answer to the yalta peace. they said it doesn't exist, and we have a world order built on rules, but order cannot be built on rules, because the rules are already secondary, because the question arises. and on what the rule is built we say, yes, this is the image that putin set about what rules you are talking about, what kind of rule, who agreed on them at all, so we are building the world order based on principles, but these principles should be voiced even then, yes,

yes, and those countries that share our principles, they should, accordingly, so to speak, yes, this is counteraction. there are obscure rules. and here there are principles i absolutely agree, it is necessary not just, that is, it is also to build against. yes , but at the same time there must be a creative own movement. what exactly we are building, what exactly we are creating, and this is what should be written at the end, but here we must refuse. excuse me the last time i won't do it again, then we have to give up two things give up the primacy of international law is no more. well, probably, yes, and the second we must abandon the eternal theory of occurrence. yes, of course, then we must say that we are no longer going to that world

with all the ensuing consequences, that we are choosing a certain other path and formulating it - this is the path in the concept of foreign policy unequivocally, can be formulated, moreover, that we had amendments to the constitution yes, regarding international law and in fact. this should be unequivocally reflected in the concept of e- foreign policy, but there are a number of other points here, but of course i would like to ask, a who makes uh, this same uh documents. eh, because this should definitely be the position of a number of institutions, in addition to state power. we have scientific institutes and, after all, a large number of sufficiently responsible players who do not apply. state about state authorities yes, respectively, it should be quite extensive discussion, which unfortunately is not, as it is in many countries when compiling this kind of documents. uh, and finally, the last point related to

concept - this is what e in the text of the concept is mentioned. many are quite strange, but why exactly these countries are mentioned, probably for that era. maybe that was what fits. well, for example, er, the turkish republic, with which it has become a turnover of about 50 billion dollars. it is our largest partner of fundamental importance now, and suddenly now i will turn to it . it is not mentioned there, not even once. generally, in principle, many countries are, but, for example, turkey is not there. but it seems to me that these are the non-western countries with which we exist partnerships do not exactly deserve a special place in the concept, in addition to how we see this my world like this, moving on to these very e countries, but it must be said that we talk a lot about the stage in which we are now at the stage we bring historical parallels . uh, with different eras. it

still seems to me that in relation to each specific case there should be these analogies. yes, with regard to turkey, i have a feeling that we are not yet at the stage. ah, world war ii. well , at least not exactly in the big stage patriotic explained this is the period when the turkish republic hesitated. in which direction should she stagger like a pendulum. uh, then, when the struggle of soviet intelligence and, as you know, german outlets left the territory of turkey, the british were also active there. uh, everything is the same in turkey, the british are extremely active , the americans in turkey are now extremely active memes. we are trying to show our humane humanitarian foreign policy. we help recovery. uh, due to the terrible tragedy of the earthquake already 35,000 more people died more than 100,000

people affected by the devastated city. and the consequences are yet to be assessed, but our rescuers were there and even helped the head of the local ministry of emergency situations. and our doctors are there on the spot, and so on, let’s say, western countries , someone arrived and left, yes, the americans sent, it’s still early in the direction of turkey well , it’s obvious to help the victims, and this is hmm what the americans will observe will. increasing the pressure on the turkish republic trying to force it to act in logics, uh, which they want is very important the day before. this is the process of changing the rearmament of the rallying of the west that is taking place today, and turkey will be weakened by this very earthquake. an investigation is now required. it is interesting that in the first place, it is turkey that provides financial support to a non-western country for restoration. it seems to me that the decisive battle for turkey, if i may, so to speak

, will be these next 3 months, when the americans will increase pressure, and visits and meetings are scheduled in the near future. uh, secretary general of nato e, p. uh, the turkish colleagues of the meeting will take place. uh, the us secretary of state with turkish colleagues is all. this suggests that the americans will increase this pressure. yes, there are still elections to turkey. uh, just three months, if there's no doubt they'll be teaching. that there is a state of emergency in ten regions, given that there are such destructions that it is physically difficult to carry them out, but the opposition insists that the opposition works in conjunction with the united states , insisting that elections must be held by all means, and, uh, the leader of the largest opposition party, actually accused erdogan of incompetence and said that it was impossible with erdogan. not like a year to stay. he even minutes uh, you can not stay. uh, in order for erdogan to be in power a little, well

, today we talked about moral and material readiness. west to resist russia to china and so on. well, as for the moral. in my opinion. all this is, you know, in such a sphere of what is called in english very signaling, that is, it is, ah, a certain signaling of virtues, because it's fashionable, it's really popular, and especially in the political class, and especially in that category that you spoke about today. here, i would call them and describe them as political inference. yes, but here you still need to understand, right? that the system of institutions, even if they were probably not struck in many cases, in my opinion, they will be able to incorporate. over time, we observe this, for example, in the usa, if we move a little away from european countries that do not make so many decisions. yes, here let's switch to washington there, well, a person who can be called such an inflator, uh, his name is more accurately alexandria ocazio cortez and yes, she went with a very left non-systemic agenda, four five years ago to the elections. well, in general, it is quite solid and tightly incorporated from the stability of democracy.

now. in general, she is quite a manageable player. that is, if desired , all this can be done, and honestly, i do not see certain threats from their side, but a political institution. in my opinion, everything can be solved with them. here. uh, what about the public opinions, yes, we are seeing in the united states, by the way, and in europe, firstly, growth, and the proportion of those who advocate the transition to peace negotiations on the ukrainian conflict, that is, fatigue to some extent from being involved in the ukrainian crisis. it grows, albeit slowly and gradually it does not directly affect all decisions so far, yes, but in the future we will have to focus on this. so, well, and we see, now, of course, the problems associated with the material component , indeed, a lot has already been said about this today. yes, of course, the western military-industrial complex will gradually build up their capabilities, but that's history. she is many years ahead. for example, by the 25th year, the americans are counting on increasing the production of missiles by five times, but still there, well, the volumes are not as large as they are now being spent in ukraine, this is not a fact in two, two and a half three years, what it is succeed. we were correctly noted

that for many corporations the military-industrial complex has an element. not a stability element. e unpredictability. they are not sure that the demand for these weapons will continue, for example, locket martin spent over 22 years, despite the fact that he collected a record profit more money on financial instruments, that is, on a buyback to buy his own shares and on dividend experience, than on the nearest firewood, that is, than to develop new weapons and increase production. yes, because, well, it's more profitable times. it's easier two and third no. again , understanding what will happen if demand falls in the future, here, of course, i think that in the future they will certainly gradually increase opportunities, but you know this, this is not exactly the current phase of the ukrainian crisis. this is for future warriors. it's for the future it could be in taiwan calculated it could be calculated for iran to northern south korea and so on. that is, here, of course, uh, such a common confrontation between the united states in different parts of the world. i think that it will, of course, grow, but it will already be a little far from the current phase of the ukrainian crisis. well, as for

the supply of weapons now, we see, yes, that they really picked up the pace at the beginning of the year, but it is quite possible that by years. it will just start to falter and fade away, because, well, there just aren't many of these weapons. to be honest, i can't imagine that it is possible to bet on ukraine on such a large scale closer to summer. well, long-range missiles okay. but there aren't many fighters. okay, there are not so many of them, but it is quite possible. that's what now , literally in the spring and summer, the biden administration will try to show some really serious successes, you see, in order to later, but try from a position of strength to impose their conditions on russia and present it as their victory, just at the beginning of the active phase of the presidential race in the united states - this is the end of 23 years. the beginning of the twenty-fourth in general voting in the primaries of all republicans and democrats. that is, such timings are also, of course, necessary to have and be ready for this. but i think that it will be necessary . as a result, if all this happens, just negotiate. maybe not directly, even with the biden administration, well, with some specific players in washington, take the same

cia director william burns or mark, whose mile constantly declares that it is necessary to proceed to some kind of peace negotiations and at the same time declares that we have already conceptually defeated russia, so we have achieved everything wonderfully in our goal, of course, ideally really fiona hill wrote about it correctly, or rather, he read it between the lines. ideally. i would like to achieve some kind of childish political stabilization within russia from the palace coup and so on, what could be sold to the voter as a big victory is different the thing is, probably still. this will not happen, so they will sell. as a victory , it was possible to partially weaken russia to impose rather serious sanctions, and not give the opportunity, yes, but in russia to liberate the main part of the territory of ukraine, and so on. that is why the biden administration is striving for this. i think that will be emphasized. but this is again such an element of political technology, which, of course, is preserved. here is the cold war. it won't end though. even if some kind of truce comes, freezing the conflict on ukraine and i liked the publication very much. and with him ferguson. this is a scottish historian and

professor at stanford at the end of last year, but in fact mail he had a publication. first of all, he admitted that for the first time in 30 years the west was already officially, in his opinion, in a state of the cold war with russia and china, but at the same time he pointed out that there are a huge number of unresolved problems back in the west, damn it, not just not the readiness of the military-industrial complex is a problem in the energy sector. this is a political split in society, a and well in in general, there are a lot of such negative elements, including the flow of migrants to the united states and so on. for starters, the west needs a period of detente in order to have a chance to win this cold war. that is, you need to sit on an agreement to freeze on some conditions. this is the same conflict situation in ukraine, uh, to unite to solve their own problems, and then with renewed vigor puts pressure on russia china well, this point of view, in my opinion, is curious. here. eh, it's also just worth preparing for this, even. if, again, we are now going in the perspective of six months or a year, we will be able to agree on something on ukraine, therefore. well, in general, these are my thoughts at the moment , boris, if you go back to what he

was started by nazism in europe and so on, then you can remember, uh. if we understand how everything is happening now , then we can come to the conclusion that this is all quite natural, because if we remember the first world war, then the horrors of the first world war, which completely shocked europe due to the fact that, in fact, during the first world war war arose military journalism. and most importantly, uh, photographs began to appear massively in newspapers and magazines. what was simply impossible before. it was really a real shock for europe. we know that this led to the deepest axiological crisis. there's an attempt to make sense of it all, and so on. it turned out that these sages of all sorts, according to this keepers of the secret faith, calmly killed millions of people. hmm, no one understood. why and uh in the thirties out of this crisis, it is clear who suggested a way out. yes, unfortunate artist,

who spent the night under the bridges of vienna. he said, i know where to go just for this you have to spend money. and to spend money quite seriously and for the sake of restoring this national dignity. it turned out that those methods and means that horrified europe 20 years ago are quite acceptable for restoring this national dignity, because they themselves have no morals, those who use them have morals, and as a result , right in the same year when hitler came to power in the thirty- third year, the first capacitor appeared, with which, in fact, began the era of concentration camps, in which it is clear what was happening. and at the same time, uh, it must be emphasized that it didn’t occur to anyone in europe that what was happening there either, because it was so overtaking. even here is the european consciousness that no one could imagine this. even khanaren, for example, his husband was a military historian, and a great professional, when she writes, we learned about auschwitz in the forty-third year, he told me, wait, they can’t get to that. are you crazy this can't be

there are at least some limits so thought half of europe, uh, and then we see, yes, what happened in the sixties, all this revolt of the youth against their parents. what is your whole god worth if it became, perhaps auschwitz on it would seem that we were very seriously protected from this, but today the same thing is happening that happened in germany in the thirties. after all, if we look, uh, who started the first world war, it was started by the aristocrats and the intellectuals, the second world war was started by the peoples, and the third world war philistinism is trying to start a war. this is the one who drinks lavender raf and who, uh, perceives everything purely aesthetically, who are not afraid of fascism. after all, fascism is aesthetically taking root in this philistine environment long ago in the seventeenth year, fascist t-shirts came out in america , and that’s all . yes, there somewhere with

a swastika walks at some parties. yes, and today switzerland is already beginning to say, in principle, that the law on the prohibition of nazi symbols. well, you can take it easy on him. that is, it slipped into this philistine environment a very long time ago, and when they tell us today, they are told, guys, yes, they will have to agree with this. why because the task is great? we are fighting to finally defeat this bear, this monster, which prevents us from living all our lives. well, let's agree. after all, someone once almost did not succeed. who cares? and, all the more so. abolished diplomacy replaced by violence and so on. and it's a mass of people, she starts with that agree. and why not the most important thing is that there is nothing to oppose to democracy? no, liberalism. no, the market, no , there is nothing that could now be opposed to this, if in the sixties you remember 100.000 demonstrations for the world all

these gif songs to write chance and anti-war movement others. today, not a single subculture, not a single demonstration. nothing commoners sit at home and not a single contours of culture and i'm not saying that, not a single subculture, not a single counterculture, and then it happens that the nord stream exploded. we say, what is a terrorist attack? if today they say we blew it up, that will be nothing, because what can we do about it. tomorrow they will start slaughtering our children in front of our eyes, hanging them on poles anywhere in the donbass, that will be nothing, because that we can oppose this, all the rules have been canceled , a space has appeared in which everything is possible, and we are trying to knock on which something to swing the doors with charters, right? you look, yes, you have a conscience, there is nothing, so today we must have this one in the wrong place, oh what our colleagues have already said today to understand what to do with it, because