although it should be noted that the story is the same. well, he showed up there, we got rid of him. who spoke there? i free you from the chimera of conscience, which of the nazis said this phrase, i free you from the chimera of conscience by and large. how many

small hypers? as if quite confident, well, she was told to speak slowly apparently and not to giggle, while she did it and what she announced, uh, s uh russia and how the united states recognized russia uh, officially responsible for crimes against humanity, but it was clear, because that blinkin spoke the day before, who spoke precisely about this, but here she made an almost official announcement. so i 'm wondering when we will start working out statuses for the united states. even if we

now declare the united states a country of terrorists with the northern stream. and this is really a terrorist country that does not support terrorism, and if it acts by terrorist methods to achieve its external foreign policy goals, then we will repeat them anyway, we will repeat their installations, which they have existed for a long time since the end of the eighties, first there in relation to iran, then in relation to other countries, so we really need to develop our own, as it were, diplomatic dictionary, which should define countries such as the united states that are violating all conventions, violating. generally. well, in fact, security, destroying the european conducts such actions, in my opinion. we must recognize the country or authority. no we have to pronounce country because uh country. uh, it's being held here on behalf of the country, therefore, here under the flag. in general, in

fact, the united states carried out a terrorist attack. i understand, i just mean that, well, the power in america, at least, presidential is changing relatively quickly. that is, by doing so we can show that with this presidential power, we will not have to know anything. here, i think that we have nothing to do with the next presidential power either. personal does not shine, even if it comes there, more or less sane. inside political issues. republican rhonda sans will be defeated and such a person will come in relation to us, this is nothing, this is geopolitics , because kamala harris says, here we have a moral interest. interestingly, we also have a strategic interest, moral interests. that's funny. yes, the wording is funny. yes, funny, but nevertheless under the moral interest. she was just talking about crimes simpler than humanity in ukraine on the part of the russian military, and the strategy in the personal house of high moral content is of strategic interest. she said

the preservation of the world order, which is american-centric, she did not say so. she has there the fourth point was the preservation of american leadership, and the second point was that it was necessary to maintain that rules-based world. naturally, the world order, which is based on the rules that supposedly exist in the year 45, well, the american-centric world of us developed in a period when there was no alternative to this american-centric world, so i understand that the united states is now upholding the order that allows them to spread american norms , american law for the whole world, that is act in such a way as if the only country, as if the concentration of everything and everything of all law, and she talked a lot about the rule of law, she talked about human rights, but this is all the guarantor of the united states, and i must say that speaking in this way, to whom

, as it were, it emphasized, and who is the master here at the merciful conference, because she spoke on the second day. she calmly summed up another point that i would like to draw attention to, because i had to look, how ivano and ibo will perform uh from the meeting of van and blinkin, quite a lot was expected that there was a meeting between ivan and and pancake. and well, glinkin, as in his own spirit, of course, he didn’t clog anything, in fact. like in anchorage. he started. yes, to communicate with vanya of the war, then his status was lowered. he was a minister, just foreign affairs. now a member of the politburo. yes, therefore, responsibility for foreign political affairs, therefore, is not like that. here is the title of responsibility for externals. how is the office. yes, it's the head reflects.

yes, the essence of it, therefore, when now they also began to demand, like, uh, then there was, well, the state department that damn it, kent, they indicated such, out and yeah , so that they would not supply anything to russia, and even if we they cross the line. when will lethal weapons be delivered? that's when we told them, well , it was understood that they would do something to the chinese comrades, therefore, no breakthrough, about which the american american media wrote, practically did not happen here. although, in general, we expected that china, and rather, damn, well, will be able to level. here is the negative that has arisen recently, i don’t think they are nervous. here is the current one. uh, the munich conference showed that the west is getting more and more nervous because they don't have

a common goal. although declaring russia as if the destruction of russia as a common goal, everyone understands perfectly well that it is almost impossible to do this, but if we have already begun to carry out, and then, if necessary, nikolai nikolayevich in this case , i just want to understand your daughter. we are with you we won't get it for a very long time. i hope never for decades the topic is really real. yes, china has got back on its feet; now its economy has exceeded the european union, that is , many people think that china is somewhere far away . there are some chinese there in the far east, which means no. this is already one of the three largest economies now, along with the us and the european union, and this is until the end of the century. even if there are major economic problems that no country will escape in modern conditions, china will still remain. well, about since ivan is blinking, well, it seems to me that well, if in the west, even in the media, there may be someone who hopes to show, yes, a good mine in a bad game, that they can regulate something. well

, it’s already a sin that tells us that the chinese are in the united states. something can turn out. moreover, where does this deep understanding of chinese specifics come from, if in the west and in russia there is still a chance for some kind of fundamental changes. well, someone out there is waiting for us to turn around on our axis. 360 ° while under the influence of some conditions , the chinese system is more complex hierarchical bone in a sense, it is connected with its specifics, that is, the decision to confront the west was made a very long time ago, the decision has not only been made, but also certain things have been implemented , which means that certain tasks have been achieved, and to talk about what will mean a truce or will start again communicate. well, in general, it seems to me, it’s just, well, the western press can be allowed a good mine in a bad game, but what really happens is really in general, the cold war is going on, microchips have limited supply to not only military corporations, in general, to all chinese. that is, at

their imports fell by 15% tens, billions of dollars the microchip industry is being evacuated from china's taiwan 4 years 5 years ago consciousness, of course, military pensioners who will deal, in fact, with pmcs, or straightforward structures that will work in taiwan, that is, the decision here is taiwan confrontation usa well, about 10 years ago, we are now it has already been implemented, it says that now someone will reconcile there, which means that again we will have to turn off the tap on the power of siberia, we will not supply. but it's, well, soft saying is not true. here, a very important thing was said about the fact that we can replace imports and create our own light industry. in general, i also really believe that in light industry, in general, we can create it in a year. this is not newton's binom, this is not microchips, not a component base. to do this , it is necessary that subsidies do not go anywhere, we really need not to talk about accreditation, but about subsidies, and here there is a very interesting chinese experience. we constantly say that the principles of market economy also led in china. here they are on legs got up, but for some reason no one remembers

that all these special economic zones were military at the beginning, not all of them were export zones. so here are the curators. there, the peoples of china were produced and everything was pinned, architects - it was actually a man who was not shared with the army. that is, you say, yes, everything opin means, probably, the army of china new who is huawei, this is a faking man with the rank of colonel in the nuak construction troops, who received his first major contract from well, what is it about? here are the conscientious the military-industrial complex suppliers that are in russia are now really working for the defense of their homeland. but why not trust them, including subsidies for the production of light industry, that this recognizes several companies at once that are brilliant to cope with this task. and this is not the chinese experience, i wear them all the time. this is not a chinese experience. the soviet experience, that is, the soviet one, too , the military-industrial complex was the main driver of the entire development of state subsidies. and here it is again repeated already in china, this is an effective experience. it can be repeated everywhere from microelectronics to conventional light industry, indeed,

analogues. nobody will feel, to any difference and so on. so this is the real story. as for these conversations in general. where do these noises come from that the chinese are now in the united states of america, that they are flying to us in russia. but there are some means the party of defeat in russia who believes what it means now, uh, we will make up there. yes, it means, uh , we will not go further to poland ukraine that it will be a very long next. this is poland, and after poland, we will return to a different geopolitical reality, yes, but these same voices often say that we are changing one dependence for another, well, nothing like that. now gazprom was 30 years old. yes, they announced that the express gas will grow, so far there are about 15. yes, yes, up to 100 billion cubic meters is it a lot or a little? we fall into some kind of dependence on china or not, but if we used to supply europe and

turkey with 130 billion cubic meters, and the giants, which is equal to the european union, it supplied god forbid there 5-10 billion cubic meters. this suggests that we had a total dependence on the west, total. well, why is something in this studio already, uh, in this they talked a lot about the students and so on, who study there and that means there is property. further, but we do not change to chinese dependence. yes , we are really going, it’s just balancing, that is, we are really building sovereignty, you say that china has now bought everything in the far east here, but we don’t measure it less quite so people. just look go blessed. with my own eyes. not in these noises are the voices of voices, the west cannot be seen with their own eyes. there are so many chinese there. there is no such a large presence there, that is, there is more than that balancing, and two insulting ones, but it is going slowly, and until now only one railway operates above all, and the trans siberian railway is that we are many times ours. uh, it means that the streams on the air said it was not a problem. oil tanks are in the queue, food,

coal miners are not resolved. and that's manual mode, so, uh, not i will speak specifically of the person in charge, a very high level in the russian federation is being destroyed that should be exported. we simply cannot put the object that we have. that is, what kind of dependence from china can we talk about? we just have there. well, at least let 's build two more railway tracks there, and so on. this is what we are talking about and i will start something to finish with what i really started with. but it doesn’t mean that we are going to play there now. with china, it will all be over in a decade. and if china is real, he has succeed in becoming a world leader, which means the next 10-15-20 years. so it is necessary to do this now, if it will be until the end of the century, one way or another determine a significant and influence our economy and politics, and so on. maybe start doing it now. well, now after the advertisement , let's start with

leith, yes, i want to return, here are the conferences. you know, i participated a couple of times and it was always interesting to know that there were different points of view. last year there was a coven, but this year it's generally some kind of surrealism, but not a single opposite no opinion was expressed. but here's who you won't listen to. of course, i would not listen to everyone, but those whom i heard, but the same defeat, the defeat of russia, we

cannot allow more weapons, more ammunition, this bastard. uh, totally agreed. we will deliver everything, we will give everything away and long-range missiles and aircraft, the minister of defense, whispers to him that there are no aircraft. we will put everything, nothing will stop us in worn shoes. give him all the money. yes, he can’t give money for his wife. that's why you understand perfectly clear the impression that the west took uh, the way to get up on the poo. the wells are not only arms deliveries - they are not only rhetoric. this is already a real statement. and from the mouth. uh, officials, prime minister of presidents. well, what an estonian says there, i think that few

people pay attention to it. but what the french say, the germans scholz, uh macron. um, well, harris, too, of course, one can be quite skeptical of her, but nevertheless, she expresses the position of the official position of the united states, and why is this say? you know, it seems to me that i don't like these female journalists, the term red lines. we do not have a president from our official ones. not uh. i don’t remember anyone saying these red lines, but nevertheless, because the west also has enu, the so-called red lines, that is, things that they are afraid of and they talked about it and continue to happen now, therefore they say especially without sticking out. you see that russia is behaving quite carefully in this conflict. and i see, but here is the nord stream. well, there are so many details and how much i

i know, for many uh, authoritative american publications quietly began their internal investigation. i think that all these anonymous letters of evidence, they will continue this issue is not closed, and i do not exclude the possibility that at some point the republicans may say so and pick up this topic that only carlson is now voicing on foxy can say that, and uh talk already. uh, some politicians, it's time to investigate this case. but, let's also get on the path of certain escalations. i, of course, i don't mean there is our favorite topic of nuclear weapons, but we have er. a very specific set of measures, but firstly, i think that on the north on the tiverse, nord stream should be answered. and i think we will simply answer

, well, our president does nothing reactively and, uh, but i think our intelligence agencies are working to collect, so to speak, really unkilled evidence, preferably documentary, of course, because americans have so many vulnerabilities. they have so much at the bottom of the atlantic ocean there extended. they have so many oil and gas pipelines in the waters of the north and norwegian seas that i fully think we have the strength and means and trained people to, er, answer such an er. secondly , the americans always say that the attack on our space infrastructure on our satellites was an incident, this was a declaration of war. fine? well, let's search too. let's start uh, starlink is a commercial structure used for the benefit of the department of

defense. i think you can touch her. let them feel very vulnerable from the cosmic infrastructure, and in the military sense, and even in everyday life, it is quite uh, it is quite possible to do, the third one is they are very afraid of kirat. we haven't launched any cyberattacks yet. first, they are very, uh, difficult to attribute to who is who is the culprit. why not start yet, that i have not heard that you were any, and cyber attacks on the critical infrastructure of not the united states or european states, you can do this, well, the fourth. we, too, uh, very much , in my opinion, these grain deals are the onboard infrastructure on the black sea, or what is it worth the means of our black sea fleet, that these infrastructure facilities, in general, this

grain deal, it needs to be stopped, except for the europeans, so to speak. so i think we have to say so too. to walk up this ladder of escalation once, uh, our opponents do not hide at all that they are, so to speak, with russia practically already. well, they call it a hybrid war, but it is already on the verge of a real war. uh, fine, but i must say that, uh, despite all these companies, we are neon conferences. here, uh, i have information that the same rent is now seriously working on e prospects, what will happen after well, two postulates, firstly, now they consider pictures, not from a dream, you can wait, so to speak. how will the spring summer period end, someone will take over, so to speak, and who will determine the position in possible negotiations? secondly, why should there be

negotiations after a 7-year period? they believe that it is still impossible to fight endlessly even in the event, so to speak, of the defeat of one of sides anyway uh, everything. it ends with some kind of conference, so to speak, yes, but who said that it was after the spring-summer company that they think that in spring and summer uh there will be uh, much more clarity, either after our offensive, or how they consider after the ukrainian offensive. well, let's see who will attack there, who will defend. i am sure, of course, that uh-huh and it is impossible to conduct successful offensive operations without having air superiority without any. eh, others. uh, components on there on armored vehicles hand over the plane about it they say on these planes. then where will they be based, here, firstly. uh, well give more than a couple of

squadrons. they can't, well, just objectively. second, the pilots. secondly, no, there is no basing system on the territory of ukraine, not just a basing system. i don't say there all the time, like uh. vpr taxiways, there is no system, but service and repair, which must be present precisely at airfields , they are somewhere, so to speak, e in another territory or other area or in another the city has nothing of this, so they must necessarily be based, especially at the first stage at airfields in the nearest countries. and this, of course, our attacks on these airfields will be perfect. logical things, but nonetheless. here they are the first thing to wait for, the second is the second postulate, that e return to normal relations. e with russia, even in the long term , there can be no indulgence, such as the opening of airspace there, the issuance of

vista to certain categories, but this is not allow and the third - they believe that should be created. uh, a new regional security system in europe this is first, uh, the definition of the circle of nenu outside the bloc countries, which should receive clear western security guarantees, but the suffering even noted should be neutral. secondly, e must be created. ah. a new regional, security organization, but we are obviously talking about some kind. the reconfiguration of the osce, because the osce in its current form , for example, i don’t understand what the canadians are doing there, but what do canadians have to do with europe when in the seventies they even had a brigade in germany which, so to speak, denoted their status, as a country that is present in europe, uh, military uh, military

incarnation is now long gone, but sit and it play a very active role. uh, in there they peck under our chairs, as i was told some kind of mugs are writhing there. well, in general, absolutely indecent things lead e along with the ukrainians a high level of culture, a high level of culture, well, the third component. yes, well, there is a reconstruction fund ukraine is all creation and, uh, rebirth in some form of arms control with elements. yes, everything is there other open-sky cis, that is, to some extent a hybrid in order to still keep e russia under a certain control. no, i'm sure that we can assume these, based on the experience of russia. well, the most terrible outfit is autumn spring. there, summer companies do not go according to our scenario for us. what's happening? further it

says everything ahead. oh, so in the autumn it is even stronger to mobilize. yes, focus even more. somehow it happened in our he’s already telling stories to russians, and so you seriously begin to roll up your sleeves, which , politely speaking, so far, only one on the back, only the cuffs have been unbuttoned and so let me remind you a little, we had 300,000. yes partially yes, if the evolutionary resource is more than 20 million, if i remember correctly, we are the same. yes , somewhere, somewhere, something in general, uh, it is considered so to speak, well, the classic total maximum mobilization resources from 10% of the population. that is, we have about a million 15 million. well, yes, yes, yes, well, let's say 3 million. well let's lower the frame to three million. of course not we are talking about the survival of russia, then he roughly says, that's what you want. i

am sure that the number of volunteers is very men who will go, rolling up their sleeves, there will be quite a few serious people in the west - everyone understands perfectly well that the resource potentials of russia are not comparable. well, at full power. they won’t like it, and then you can make a macron’s statement, we’re not talking about the desire to defeat russia. who are you talking about russia at all , or this one, which hasn’t been skid for a long time and not driven on asphalt. here. hear what this sunnah says from a man who even his own chair didn't vote for, regarding ammunition stocks, the message i want to convey to people is to remember what these stocks are for. if you are a european country and you have this ammunition, then you have to ask yourself, against whom will you defend yourself? why do you need them. does any of these stockpiles help destroy russian tanks

, isn't that what they should be used for? well then the question arises. listen to poke. and we have a dagger and such a question, shouldn't they be used for this, to destroy cretins like you, who have settled in decision-making centers, so that the population of london does not suffer from you, by the way, you are never elected. well, just because of this logic, that if there is a british weapon that is supposed to kill russians then the question arises. but we produced hypersound, and there are quite a few. here sergei tverchenezov reported. we have many times increased in our heads, nothing comes to it you can knock and, moreover, not only a finger, they completely brutalized. well, well, it's just morons yes, the immortals are mentioned the phrase sergey viktorovich lavrov lieutenant, that is, we will fight with them directly. well, you know, we are getting closer and closer to this, because

i was hoping that after all, uh, some devil would come up when he says no, you can’t go any further, because further this is already fraught with a really transition, and this conflict phase of mutual destruction itself, but apparently, they believed so much that we will continue. so to say behave very decently to amaze. so to speak, the elements. uh, so dual- use critical infrastructure, but still not that critical. like, for example, the same odessa port, for example. but uh, where did they believe it? it seems to me already fundamentally that you will still wait. yes, we will have to break them up at eleven, of course, our president did not act as a scammer this week, yes, but before analyzing what he said, these western statements here. they are for everyone came up with some stereotypes.

i'm

generally a peaceful hacker pacifist. for most of their activities and we will meet you. sincerely. everything that surrounds us digital will always be the object of attack. accustomed to watching the video stopped working , install, open, watch.