just these goals, they are as follows, all those who had to throw folders fled abroad of our motherland, and society consolidated in this sense. i don't agree. our society has consolidated today and it is consolidating more and more, including around some of these economic issues.

i’m planning education, i spoke about fundamental changes to your program, that’s what i would like to hear a message from, not only alexander mikhailovich but, of course, as if to the federal assembly, but i see that the hall has gathered at three times more than the federal assembly itself in terms of number and and all, uh, all of russia is listening. so they did translations. that 's right, you said at the beginning. remember, i told you that let's at least start a running line let all western

channels make mouths on our channels. you even we translate and send to the communist party. we have such a special one and we translate and translate from spanish into english, because people have a lot of questions, in our country there are a lot of questions, right? you can talk like this there with such stormy phrases, but people want to know? but what about how to be? as a salary , and how to get means, this or that allowance and or and what are the goals and yesterday, when i spoke here on the transfer, i said, of course there will be a conversation about hotels operations tasks. although they, too , have long been clear and understandable to everyone. how it all began. well, anyway, this must be repeated, because people should understand in russia , there was simply nothing to do on their channel , the seventh part is absolutely exactly so flawless and the goals are clear and understandable. we had to protect our people, we will do it. now i'm listening to the echo already

canoe. yes, he throws these firewood again. repeat the president. there she sits next to me. here she is, well done, she's here. it means, uh, what are they doing, they destroyed georgia so that the other president was there was in georgia remember when he had grenades on his shoulder there. but they forget that and why they destroyed it, because there are other people there who do not agree with this, not only we do not agree with russia, but others agree or transnistria is biden, says about the belarusian people they say about the russian people, that like everyone wants freedom says, but to the moldovan people, but does not talk about the american people, who are now swearing at biden and saying, where did you get money to ukraine? we have a wild misfortune. now i'll show you. look, the mayor of the city tells him, where did you go, biden wrote nothing. you saw the president. joe baida in ukraine forced to sympathize with the offended president

of ukraine and this was judged unconditionally. the biggest one, who says that he doesn’t give a damn, agrees to be ready to send whatever he wants. i knew in the morning at one of the briefings that he was in ukraine giving a million dollars to the people there, not to us. i am angry on president's day in our country. yes , he is in ukraine on president's day. it speaks of what kind of person he is biden, take care of the american people . americans despise you. are you an environmental disaster? people there need help, but he is worried about those peoples who curse him for the misfortune of the same ukraine of the fourteenth year. who was the main biden arsonist, his team of russophists, of course, but continuing the topic after all expectations from the message, of course, every politician every person of an organization, especially the political one that you belong to, it

checks its policy with the state anyway. especially with the first person of the state. with what tasks and how they will be performed by the tools, so we carefully watched all the meetings. e leaders of our party there a week ago, she passed as regards my chairman? and parties. yes, i didn’t just pass, but he essentially said the president then, you know, you are in many, but he is a man honest and it showed all the channels. you were right in many respects. you turned out to be right in many ways many years ago. this also applies to today's questions. i thought, here he said, he honestly said, and the channels repeated could and not he could, well, praise the duty officer like that. he said exactly that you were right, and i thought rims, and whether it will be reflected. this is a wire message and i see that it is reflected in

many ways. well, yes, i told you, well, 15 times, but i was supported. i spoke, even dmitry is a rocket in the medium short range and about the exit from or suspension of his back in the fourteenth year at a meeting with the president. so, i spoke there and i would say maybe well , yesterday i spoke about why this should be done? remember, i spoke here with you and e during the shutdown, including testing and nuclear, because everyone here started talking about the application. i say, yes, you are still at least at the stop of the contracts. why because on the one hand, this shield protects us today in many ways still soviet, yes to you, well , updated, because we almost destroyed mine ballistic missiles sng-2, thank god, we then refused it. well, everything was spelled out there, they refused not to ratify, which means, but the fact

is that we must improve this shield, and in the time remaining for us, we see and speak to us, and the president confirmed today. yes, what did they confirm everywhere? the european union just passed nato before that, the european union ukraine summit, which means, er ramstein they say, we our task will destroy russia, which means, our task is to prevent russia from being destroyed at least. yes, the president said today so we exit, but the arguments. he says that some have already begun to say that, well, they say the situation has changed. she hasn't changed. here, i spoke on, you know alexandrovich, on , uh, missiles under this treaty. i worked on it for a long time and collected an expert for 4 months. i performed at the house. i was all over it then, it's not even about how much we cut. you speak correctly there. how much do we destroy? how much he puts off, but his biggest defect was in control and telemetry, and plus in refusing to depend on missiles. they are

just signed right after that. they left after 4 months and then in lisbon they signed an agreement, and we said, they are depriving us, they are gradually coming out of the open sky. they come out of anti-missiles, and they don't come out. only from where they go they run and watch, and we let them in. let's go out, i say, i then say, i say to you, i am now glad that it happened not because i am such a militarist i just understand that now they will move their brains. it's not the case there only in these settings. there i have a long time about these parameters there, general dinon, calm there, who are still within the russian border. and for example, the trains that we had. we refused them nuclear trains. and now let them think where these trains are, how they run, because they won't know anything. this is education. we are communists all the way talking. why are you destroying? well, why are you destroying the army, we said well, why are you giving up weapons-grade plutonium? why

baren? sea, sign norway, i'm all time thought, spoke, spoke my comrades. they also have a clear conscience. they say this everywhere, today i saw and displayed about education, though not completely. i would like school education to be changed cardinally, in general it is higher education. well, yes, it is necessary to change let it gradually. well, it uh man already comes with a fucked up education with this guessing game that was introduced into the school. why is it easy for her? you can leave, because it has nothing to do with bolognese at all. this is also in the department of our officials. and of course i'm like a communist today e you much from this message and received satisfaction. you know, even according to the businessmen that were selected correctly, he said that he doesn’t feel sorry for them, right? they said many times, even in the end, private. zation ran everyone shouted, yes, there will be war. if you take away from us , you will begin to take away. we then said, yes, not one guard is even important for you, not the hub. so it goes back today, but the fact is

that if other interesting i see two partners. potanin prokhorov i don't know anyone else personally, but i'm watching alone plows. here all the time he does not have any nba stadiums in new york, and he is not visible there and here. he sold, well, he sold, well, you don’t believe something, that is. these are the hints i will say, even more. i once spoke about an oligarch on your program, there about three months ago. so he wrote me such a show. you told me i won't go to court, i won't go into it. i wrote to him, as expected, the deputy should answer in a month, what do you think? i say, well clarify me. how are you with the germans? but how about take it off yourself, like you this. and you answer me as a deputy. he had to answer. i am obliged to answer him, and he still understands me, they are sitting on their own grabbing this money, in case the deputy starts, they grow up shut him up and begin to threaten it, it hasn’t gone anywhere and delhi hasn’t gone anywhere. i looked at many in the hall, of course i i would like to hug

and kiss everyone. all of us now, finally understood everything to stop, which is what it is about. i just told you not to have this dietary picture. voted for these issues fought for these issues, you know, and i'm not because there we ended up so the story was deduced. yes, i am very, i am very glad that today the society must turn around and never turn back, because it will abandon the oligarchs. i'm leaving. you have been gone for a long time, from everyone for a long time, in which you have not been for a long time. i said yesterday that remember stalin's expression , we must run 10 years. yes, here you are money money say everything is money money where will we get it, where will we get it? let's go abroad. let's not give. and where did we get the money, we americans sent us in many ways, by the way, speaking, we found specialists inside, including including in bonded loans, they bought the bottom, the country ran through in 10 years, wait, i

know that you will now sing your capitalist song there, but i go, let me finish. here for 10 years. run again, the country was supposed to run this gap for 100 years, no matter how beautifully we say now, but we still lag behind, of course we lag behind. it's stupid not to understand. you can even shut my mouth now. but we must for these 10 years. i say, today putin stood up for us, he must say, and he said a lot. he is not so, maybe bright, he is technically calm. you didn't annoy anyone. we must rely on our own strength to see. are you sure that well, remember the history of stalin that you want putin to be stalin for you right? what does it have to do with it for us, it should be just very simple then, well, there can be a number of problems for a political party; i draw historical analogies. of course, i'm not a fool. volodya , what do you say to me, they will start me exactly what, or putin will be putin yes, damn it, to your health.

well let's not make an idol like we did at one time, they began to make it from the same. that's exactly what i'm talking about, you can putin. i just have certain taxes there and i see that the country is following this path, the country once being the seventh became. second. here we must become. well, at least the second, and here, most likely, the first, so that no one will remove us, and this historical perspective shows that this can be achieved . was. they are china, not vietnam, they are early nobody. they are even, in short, to recall that such a terrible export was mined and robbed, that's all. well, well, what you bargained for, the thirties were taken away. sorry, the museum was taken away from us. remind me how the museum was robbed and sold everything that volodya could. but in the nineties it wasn’t, or what? i am the main one, i

understand correctly that, after all, madassini is not the way the bolsheviks wanted, not the state economy 100%, i hope that today the communists understand this. contradictory now to what you said, we, the states , will help you here. this is here, and business there, may the lord himself. we are not against this state, it was absolutely correct that he was a person who knows this period very well and released a whole brilliant cycle, what a year we can say, if sasha alexander galushkin started working there wonderfully. there was no full. this started the pace

of the economy at by no means 100%, but the state, so let's not oversimplify. i am happy with today's message. i am glad that the society and the aspirations of including the people behind my party well done but also have to move on this path they puff on communists, as they rightly said in education. well, all the way now it will pshikat demons. listen, right? the question is to prepare you. get ready. get ready here. we are not afraid of anyone. yes, yes, by that, vladimir vladimirovich quoted today not at all low to anyone. here was one quote and non-communists were quoted by vladimir vladimirovich listen i want to thank

you for such a responsible and firm position and remind me of the words of the patriot and statesman petrakovich stolypin, they were said in the state duma more than 100 years ago, but fully in tune with our time. he said in the matter of defending russia, we all must combine our efforts with our duties and our rights in order to maintain one historical highest right, the right of russia to be strong. and by the way, this is one of the three applause that he was given after watching this. why, communists always hate stolypin. so you wanted to replenish first. now i would like to share my impressions about the president's message to the federal assembly. the first thing i noticed was that the president told in great detail the background to the beginning of the special. to

be honest, i don’t have the impression at all that it was an attempt to bring a legal political basis to our political decision to conduct a special military operation, because this has been done a long time ago and is not enough. who has doubts. i rather have a picture that our president is absolutely sincerely disappointed with the period when we actually absolutely sincerely truly saw in our western e. opponents. and then we saw them as partners, with whom yes it is difficult. yes, it's hard. yes, we do not agree on all issues, but nevertheless we proceed, at least from common ideas about international law, but the rules of the game, that we are interested in trade in that we have security on the continent, so that we built a future that will come from our interests. and you know. that's when i heard the president. more and more, i got the feeling that it is unlikely that in

the near future it is possible that when we can to return to even trying to build some kind of joint future with them, based on mutual trust, because when the leaders of the largest european states openly said that we deceived and lied for only one purpose, to arm ukraine and incite against russia and make sure that they first destroy the donbass and then after that move to the crimea, it is quite obvious that after that we can talk about some kind of trust or about the fact that power will change there, that it will be different? i think already, of course it will not be at all relevant. it was very important for me that the president very clearly outlined the name of our main enemy. and the name of that force, which is now a small advertisement, so we know what the president said.

reveal the president's intrigue very clearly. designated our main enemy. and that enemy is neo-liberal totalitarianism , that's the term that he coined, and i think it's absolutely all-encompassing, because it's also our external enemy. this is our internal enemy, which is in our country, trying in every possible way to penetrate into our society to our youth to our children to infect our society with this bacillus that destroys it from within. not in vain. in general, last week george soros was speaking at the munich security conference. uh, hmm the scale of the conflict.

he brought ukraine far beyond the borders. he said that if russia wins this will be the biggest blow to open societies. this is a term that we have repeatedly considered here, introduced by karl opera - this is a society that has no taboo and in which it is permissible. this is set by the individuals themselves. that is what we see in western countries, where, in principle, there is already an end of hmm forbidden things that could be legalized and they are very confidently moving in this direction. and this is the world that we are fighting in this political sphere in the economic in the social in any sphere. this is not the world of liberal totalitarianism, which we must definitely defeat. i concluded for myself that, when the president quoted escala such a phrase that patriotism and love. e to the country is when your personal fate is inextricably linked with fate state and the fate of the country. i think, you know

, we say all the time most of the strange majority, the citizens of today are not like the majority of those who don't think so. and those who go against this approach. this is actually a statistical error is another question, where was this statistical error before this position manifested itself very much were in public positions in leadership positions did not fit from tv screens, so you get the impression that the people we knew saw them so much , which are here showed such a position and left began to criticize their own people. in fact , a nation of its own warrior heroes who protect our security today, and 99.9% of our citizens absolutely inseparably link their fate with the fate of their state. our western opponents understand this very well. the president said that actually before. he said that we cannot be defeated on the battlefield. well, and then he said that the steps that our western enemies are taking are aimed at one thing, at

the internal childhood, the bilization of our states on various levels. well , we know very well how they are trying to destabilize us politically. we know very well how they do different kinds. social casting in order to arrange a social tension here. from which it will still result in political tension, we know how they are trying to incite inter -ethnic inter-religious strife, which again very quickly turns into a political confrontation, and we understand that the steps that they are taking in the economic plane, then there are sanctions that they impose against us were originally aimed at one thing - to hit the citizens, causing them to want to take political steps that will cause internal political destabilization in the country they shot for themselves. the legs of the hand turned themselves into invalids in order to achieve this goal. the result of all this policy, as the president said, was that our

economy did not fall by 20-25%, i also heard all these forecasts, and first of all. here are our economists who went somewhere they began to say that russia would no longer be there until august. there will be a default, something else will be a 20-25% drop. this is at least 2.1% so the economy fell, and then only in the second quarter, as the president said , the third quarter is already on. we have entered a growth cycle, and i think we should be fair here and note that the simply phenomenal work of our government, which, under such conditions, after codes, after all, copes with tasks of such incredible complexity. it was not in vain that the president quoted stolypin and said that russia's supreme right to be strong and i think that in the current conditions and always in history you are not that our right is our duty to be a great country. we cannot exist in any other framework. we are either great, or we are not, in general we will not exist on the world map if we are not

a great state of the great power, on which the future of all mankind depends. and finally, i want to draw attention to the question, which, of course, relates directly to my field of professional activity to the issue of education reform, which is what the president. you know, this is a topic that is constantly being discussed; for as long as i can remember, higher circumcision has always been discussed. how to return to a specialty or how to keep a bachelor’s degree or a master’s degree, how to teach for five years six four someone says two plus two plus two, you need to study, in my opinion, for the period in which we are now, the president chose the most optimal solution , because any solution is here, which will be cut with an ax like this and it will be here is a single one for physicists and for lyricists and for the humanities and for the natural sciences. this would be disastrous for the sphere of higher education. in fact, this decision, of course, will still be worked out in the future, if necessary, local acts

are necessary. there, the new standards of the ministry of science of higher education must be adopted by a large number, and by -laws in order for us to understand how this will be disclosed, but in fact the president has become the next, as far as i understand him, glasses in a row. it as such no longer exist will it will be. which will last either 4 years or 6 years at the choice of the university. uh, the magistracy, as a format, will remain for those who want it and for those who believe that a narrow-profile specialization is needed in the profession that teaches that there or another university and where this leads us , we must understand where bachelors and masters came from . yes, we often think that this is a consequence of the bologna system. this is not entirely true, and in china there is an undergraduate master's degree and in many countries that do not are included in the bologna system in reality. it was a desire to make sure that our diploma is recognized abroad. why do it? well, i don't think that our state should be interested in our citizens being able to easily find work

in other states. i think this clearly should not be the goal of state policy , the state should be interested in the fact that our citizens, receiving higher education, can be useful to their country to benefit it and are to achieve personal success in their state, therefore. yourself the thesis make it so that these diplomas are easily recognized , accepted and so on abroad, it is unlikely to come from the interests of state policy and state power, but at the same time there are many universities for which the preservation of a master's degree is a great opportunity to attract foreign students. it must be understood that for a year or two to attract a student from both india and china to study in russia is much easier and much more understandable for the same student. than, say, to attract him to a six-year study in a specialist, therefore this is quite a reasonable decision to leave the magistracy, and whether the bachelor's degree will be 4 years or six years should depend only on who the university prepares, doctors will tell you that in 4 years you will not prepare anyone,

while for many humanitarian specialties. this problem is not really and the last thing i would like to say is the completion. in parallel with our president, well, later , another president decided to appeal to the citizens of russia. this is united states president joseph biden, who appealed to our citizens. having said the following, that we are not at war with you, our enemy is putin. we wish you. all the very best. happiness, health, good luck in personal life. i don't know roughly who joseph biden's technologists are. but, probably, we need to explain to them what to tell our citizens, that you want them well and all the best from poland. this is not the best decision at the moment and in general historically, because later our citizens associate it with turmoil and very specific events in the history of the state, which ended thanks to the civil consolidation that it was the citizens who took and pushed the foreign occupiers out of here, so i advise them to communicate with their

citizens. our citizens. we have our own president, who gave such an exhaustive answer to all the questions that concern us today. that no one has any doubts about the correctness of the chosen course , i definitely have no money. by the way, what team biden putin's performance with cute? because biden did not find anything to answer. he uttered a crazy text with a wild number of reservations. for some reason, warsaw was destroyed in soviet times. but on the other hand, a person cannot find himself on the path. look, therefore, he believes that what is written by someone in text is still able to pronounce it correctly. it's just weird. you see, a separate uncle is presented to unfold the baidan. but this is, but this is a shame biden took off the track, duda drank it, then brought it. and of course, what he said aga care. about the russians. he does not fight himself. well, exactly. let him tell

everything she said. this is what the pole prime minister said that he said about the russians, that is, our culture will be closed by sanctions against. yes, just about any citizen of russia is also family members. let the children of the enemies of the people write.