russian soldier surrender and we will meet you. sincerely. everything that surrounds us digital will always be the object of attack. but the fact is that according to the performance, it was intended. in general, probably not quite for the europeans, not quite for the poles , i remembered it in the mail there. he said they were fighting for freedom, and by and large this speech was aimed at americans more. here you are, i am a front-line president. so i just went to the front. i'm on the sidelines now, which is is on the verge of war with such a terrible nuclear power as russia, which, in general, has now embodied all the evil

that was the russian empire and in the soviet union, in general , there is nothing worse than russia in this world, and now i am here, so this message is quite clear there is some kind of trump in some kind of aha, i say, but some kind of agenda, 47. he says, yes , some kind of rum landing in beautiful florida to perform. and here i am at the front, and there he said he already repeated what he had him. in general, in the message about the test. true, the message was a test for america, and here already for america for the european union. and for nato and the fact that this is a special operation, everyone wins there about the fact that ukraine was supposed to collapse. she stood up, and the fact that we will help and the message of russia, so i waited. to be honest, the message to the russian people. that's how he 'll turn what he wants to tell us. well, what he said had nothing to do with it at all, then

he diluted it with the fact that he is introducing new sanctions against you, that is, against the same the people to whom the message to whom he addressed. we are not fighting against you, that russia , in general, has never been a threat to us, and now all of a sudden, well, in general, this very message itself. he can be perceived, fucking, only the americans are not very critical, well, the british. yes, that's if the british were critical of the british british tabloids perceived perceived. it's like the americans feet, they wiped it off, they perceived it. we decided to perceive this perceived this tank for such a clean net coin united states from which i say that this country may still have something else, because it is there, and a framework. there are parts of the republican party that at least look at biden in this way, so compare our president. it can't be there. that's what the west focused on this

start-3, about which, in fact, it was not necessary to extend it. and the fact that the president's message contained moments that, in my opinion. they are more serious that if you supply more long-range. you will supply weapons there, and missile planes, which we will be forced to push back the threat, that is, to move further in ukraine, this is quite practical. yes, in the west yes, not only among westerners it did not sound. that's somehow dsmv-3 and that's it, and it came from this, but e recently in munich well, perhaps italian is this a woman? yes, this commander, after all, the troops of the american troops in europe , would have a joint job as a commander of the troops. he should have stated what we need without the f-16 and without

long-range missiles, we will not win, that is, thereby, like, this controversy it goes on and the west is westerners. they didn't notice him, they didn't notice him. they're also about us if the united states does a test, and they need to do a test. they've got an old missile, uh, hmm, and a strategic nuclear device, that's a missile, and we're testing new types of nuclear weapons. here's what the president said. come on, i climbed into the mine, yes , i shot an american video, they didn’t see it, it ’s crazy on a chinese tourist climbed in mine, and everything is rusty there. uh -huh just, well, really everything is rusty, the combat shaft is not decommissioned, but the combat mine in any case, here, too, somehow special attention is not paid to this. uh, western western press in

general. but indeed, dsnv is the main thing, the second point, which should also be noted by biden. if, uh, the editors quickly find, but show me a map of this bucharest nine, because this is the sanitary cordon, which in the fourteenth year, in the middle of the fourteenth year, she began to build. poland encouraging americans. they issued it in november fifteenth. this is what, in fact, the expansion goes on to strengthen the first echelon, belarus , ukraine, moldova, and then further turning to the southern flank. this is for the caucasus, first of all , for this idea, they have not gone anywhere, they are not rebuilding it now, therefore. supporting this bucharest nine also needed to be covered, because they began to seem to forget, moreover, here, if duda was not taken to kiev she saw each other, that is, actions. what is the last name? dudu of his surname andrzej is his

name and socks. biden said yes so that oleg should be, and socks, and he is duda over there, you can remove him, so support this bucharest nine. this was also an important task. here, the main thing is to get rid of it, you can do without, it was, but the main thing is that the american president, no matter what he is called, if only he does it here you are, this is a cordon sanitaire in fact and in the first shallot, if they succeeded in the twentieth belarus now ukraine well , it is clear that sandu moldova is a seal, that is, a complete separation from e from western europe with which you recently were partners and control two years ago. here this new europe needs russia's relations with finiteness and the eurasian space. well,

the complete strangeness of the united states. and the last thing about? i wanted to say that the visit of the water is important, to be honest, starting from munich, it is very important that it happened right now, when there is a message from the russian president, yes, the message that was noted. yes, uh a message that supposedly the world. well, one way or another presented biden, then that russian-chinese relations even in these conditions, and the chinese uphold the principles of territorial integrity. it's iron. yes , the principle of sovereignty here presented plan in china at least as it is set out back in the west suggests two things two things. this is a truce and cut off supplies to the warring parties. well, i don't know who goes there. in any case, it clearly goes with regard to the supply of supplies that go to ukraine, but

there is no talk that russia will withdraw its troops in this peace plan. well, so how would he therefore this plan today at the meeting on the merits. we supported, we will support him. if this is the case, i think that the americans, of course, will not agree to this plan, but it is important that they will not. the tunnel will not go. and what will china do if their plan is not accepted, they will say, then we will equalize the chances. let's give russia a lot of weapons. perhaps there are not only weapons, there may be materials, but the weapons we need there are not quite weapons, nothing here is the one that is for us there chip, for example, which for us, probably, there were concerns who were aware that it was important. a terrible secret, a bruise on the head of the baidan was revealed no eastern european countries nato baiden, appeared with a dark spot on

his forehead with silence to calm. this is not a hematoma, but a trace of ashes, which catholics smear their foreheads on ash wednesday. and the beginning of great lent on this day is a special ceremony of sprinkling the heads of believers with illuminated ashes - this rite marks contrition repentance , which is required to open drunken time according to status, and around it all the rest were not catholics. why were they with a dark spot on their forehead and the question is next that is, he is the only catholic there. and the fact that he didn’t croak on the path. it was he who decided to bend the knee on the first day of lent, guys. well, this is a strange version. well, let's get serious. yes, well, let's somehow be more serious , it's interesting in itself. yes, probably in part of this world of ours, someone is eating. what will the new president drink? obviously, the ashes from

the catholic tradition and how nice that biden is a real catholic who supports homosexual brakinders and abortions. it is probably so characteristic of the catholic that one should pay attention to the fact that a meeting of the security council was held on yes, where actually we raised the issue of these. eh, explosions, and sabotage on our northern streams, thereby showing that, in fact, he practically the security council could not do anything. they seem to be investigating. but the fact that, as china actively supported us, because if we had advanced this resolution , if it had advanced further, then china would have begun to promote a resolution related to balls and all the other affairs, by the way, the american revolution, which they must vote tomorrow, or something, for now. took 68 votes. i

mean, with the condemnation of our special operation in ukraine, the word is a bit biden when he spoke, he said last year in october. we scored 143 votes condemning russia's actions in ukraine as general, now they have scored 68, which shows the attitude of the global south and the work that our diplomacy has done. i don't want to say yes. let's go back by voting advertising.

there are two awards that are the most expensive for a russian warrior - a medal for courage and the order of courage. yes, of course , i understand everything about services to the fatherland with swords, but the most soldier awards. i'm driving here. regularly to the guys and when you ask what he was awarded with, this is the most reward for the men. they give me thank

you lieutenant because nothing happens by chance if such a high-ranking statesman, china arrives at that moment. when biden is in europe, knowing that biden will be in europe these days, then this also has certain message, how can we read this visit of wang and the fact that his president of the russian federation is in the first place, who is wang-i? it's like you can say, uncle over the minister of foreign affairs, that is , he is, as it were, higher than the minister of foreign affairs money. he seemed to have worked himself, in this

position for quite a long time before that. by the way, he was engaged in taiwan. and in general, he is a japanese specialist by education, he knows the japanese language well, but now he seems to be heading the office of the commission on international relations of the cpc central committee so timing is really important here. and in general, and of course, it is clear that when they write here that this is the head of china's foreign policy, some here, so to speak, are not accurate, because the head is still sitting. that is, he but this person who trusts xinping and the person does not. why not, then in the americans all the time for this top diplomat, let's say, so the main organizer of e diplomacy. yes, don't break it. here e. well, look. here he said yesterday such a phrase, which immediately scattered around to all the media and, in my opinion, a very figurative

expression that our relationship is as strong as the rock, in fact, in chinese it sounds a little different there. he said that our relationship is mature, strong and stable, like a mountain of taishan. well for china for chinese consciousness. this is really such an image, that this is something indestructible, therefore, in the end, translation. well, not too far away from the original. and, of course, there were a lot of these insinuations in the western press, and even today, in my opinion, the new york times, someone else they wrote that, supposedly, china distanced itself from russia there, but this is what the americans call spin, yes, that is, like a good pr that they tried, but in fact, attempts. eh, americans, in general , the west is to grope. and where are the russian chinese, here they disagree, here, in my opinion, the last 40 years. there hasn't been a single year that they haven't tried to find something. that's where

we are there, maybe in africa where we are or somewhere else we don't quite match there and another important thought that was voiced today, that our relationship withstood this very difficult period. well, for 22 years, that is , the past year he has shown that indeed our attitude is fully consistent with this model of a comprehensive strategic partnership. well, some of us have proposed. let's announce that we have a military-political alliance. well, by the way, and long before swa, they said that we are still more comfortable for us and the chinese. this is the existing model, since it is more flexible, and at the beginning of 22, putin, who was in february at the opening of the winter olympics. he said that or rather, he did not say, but his chinese colleague told him that, although this is a strategic partnership, but there are no restrictions in it. that is, we can we do not have

any prohibitions we carry out. joint exercises and, in principle, he asked baths when an american told him that you should not supply them. and why do you supply ukraine? that is, although it was just such a question, but it seems to show, well, that well, the attitude that is in china it seems to me that such a pragmatic attitude is a very healthy wording, facing china from the europeans. you should not cause the chinese to feel a sense of historical hatred by the chinese to the americans to tell china that china should. and what the chinese press shouldn't have done very well today on this matter. what and who are you to dictate to us and in general to us so to speak impose what we should do this is it. it seems to me that it’s not easy, because you are like that, but because, it seems to me, it’s like any chinese. that will support such

a formulation of the issue that china is pursuing an independent independent policy and no uncle in a pith helmet should point. what to do with whom to be friends, to whom what not to supply? well, really, uh, the second one. it seems to me that the components of this visit are important. this is preparation for the meeting, sidimpina. already his arrival in moscow that is , we can say that the war, in particular, acted as a sherpa. well, this is certainly true , because i just started by saying that he is not the arbiter of foreign policy, but he is a person who is very close to the chief leader, and he kind of understands all the nuances. and of course. he probably said a lot of things in the private part of the conversation, because we see

how real the positions of russia and china are , in my opinion with the european union. and, of course, the pressure is colossal that if you are there, we will block it for you, despite this our relationship. well, according to our ambassador igor vladimirovich margulov, they seem to be the best now. by the way, our leaders are the best in 400 years of russian -chinese relations. that is, this is a truly unique moment, but i would say that china is in this sense, well, not only china is taking such a sound rational position. take a number of countries in asia, and not only asia in africa, in my opinion, sergei viktorovich lavrov threw such a term , in general, into public circulation, the world majority, the world majority, which perfectly understands what is happening in europe , what is happening around ukraine and how, taking into account the history of recent ? yes last there

2003 years, how do i relate to all this, well, i won’t list everything shitty and india and the arab countries here before, uh, before to types , such a concept as the asian century of the asian century was exaggerated a lot in the western press - it’s like an idea that europe it is gradually, well, as it were, its dominance in world politics and, in general, the dominance of the collective west well, due to, firstly, the mistakes and wrong actions of the west itself , this dominance is shrinking ping by the way, saying in the eighteenth year such gave a very important speech, which was titled. eh, that we are entering an era that has not changed for the last 100 years, and maybe even the last 500 years. what did he mean that really, in our eyes , these new, well, giants are emerging in asia and

other regions of the world, but the west cannot. to put up with this, and therefore this is frenzied aggressiveness, which is what we discussed today, well, a lot is really on the verge of some kind of hysteria or absurdity. and here sits the pin. i think he understands very well. here are the roots - this is hysteria insane aggressiveness. and then there are countries such as china india other large asian and non-asian african countries. this is the key to that in general. well, as it were , global development, it will still gradually straighten out, well, into some kind of rational one. well, of course, this is all a very difficult and dangerous process, which, well, in many ways, so to speak. these processes depend on whether russia survives this confrontation. you understand quite rightly, if it is better, the more weapons they burn in ukraine, the less they will cost. wherein

does it matter if the commandant wins in taiwan or not? that is, the americans will not let them just peacefully devour the chances of zero for the americans, taiwan is such a bargaining chip. it's like changing. how are you holding us back? how discreet when the americans change with someone for something, the americans are just waiting for the moment, indeed, this is a bargaining chip in the sense that they can easily completely pay with taiwanese lives to detain china yes, but they are the perimeter that atson outlined on january 8, 1950 of the year. taiwan is not included. well, nothing happened. this is no coincidence taiwan was not originally included, so this is a bargaining chip. six months later speeches from another. no, what is the reason we are saying that china will not be allowed to be devoured by peaceful people , of course, that you are all sorts of china did not think, no matter how homedan would like it, but if they arrange an orange one,

well, china, as always, wants to wait. why is it that the communist leader of china but the current leader of china was told this story, and we also say that, as it were, wait 500 years for him to live. uh, float enemy corpse. they themselves feel this way. i think there are a bunch of them. now urgent tasks. in the same china, i would not, as it were, simplify. uh, the situation in china because it really showed up there after the covid. well, it's kind of fragile. although, in principle, here we know that the un forecast for us economic growth, in my opinion, is 0.4% china will be 4.8. sorry, which means fragility has appeared, and behind its own there are 4,000 years of written history. china's fragility has always been, but i mean they want it to be like a powerful economic the locomotive that has always been china, it has slightly slowed down now, and , of course, china is interested in me

not being a great specialist in china, but, if i remember correctly, in my four thousand years , somewhere around 3,600. china was the main economy of the world. yes, until the middle of the nineteenth century, then for several. well , there for several decades. 30 years it fell out now it is returning so then they didn’t consider the economy the size of the economy was still considered as that is, they didn’t consider it according to modern economics at 19:00, looked at economically for the chinese. then it still was. sorry and fuck you, great geographical discovery long before listen to the great fleet. i understand, but we see by the level of development. how many people lived? what was the level of wealth when we talk about four thousand years of writing civil wars, of course, but always if the story is what it was about, it's not a description of exploits. and this, in particular , the transfer of land. these are property papers. i mean, it's completely different. and so, when we talk about fragility

china yes china has developed this form of state stability, going through centuries of peasant tailings between conditional wars. what knows well that power can be anything but weak? and throw it proved it many times, so when we talk about chinese fragility. i wouldn't exaggerate here. so it is necessary to test such an iron will and such a merciless hand that, well, the chinese have not won a single war. we are talking about internal stability, not external, but without winning a single war, china ate a military theorist who is unknown was or not, but at the same time he ate all the invaders for himself, assimilated his culture, taught his language and turned all his invaders into chinese , there were two invaders. this is genghis khan and manzhura, these japanese. the japanese, no, before that

, there weren't any jujes yet. fuck, let's. so, let's calm down chinese history has been a lot. there is and will be, you know, but everything is fine. the fact is that there is a single state, it has been and will be and should be treated down, so to speak, the chinese leadership is really pursuing quite nuanced policy. it’s like, well, at different levels at once, it resembles a game of one and a half billion people on many chess at once, a little plus, as it were , interests around the world, of course, everything can yes, i uh, well, since you read it, we talked, come on, the truth is really about about first about the reaction in the united states and in the west in general to putin's message, i do not agree that they saw only sn-3. i've read that what they write. eh yes. the first day the first hours in view of the time difference were news notes, not star well smv-3 according to ours, but

then it went a deeper analysis. unfortunately, they certainly did not reach some depths there. well, they were not going to, but at least four media outlets. in big there da hill street journal new york times and cnn remembered the clash of civilization against the backdrop of putin's speech that is, earlier in civilization. immediately, as it were, as the subtitle went everywhere, it is clear that they were peeping at each other. somehow it is also clear that journalistic work is such a thing, but nevertheless, they remembered this. this is the first moment. second point, of course. uh, here's what dmitry said about the fact that he either called or raised the stakes. putin also noticed. it’s like they said about it yes, that the stakes have been raised, some really didn’t realize that some really fell into a visk-a-la-bydom, that this is nuclear blackmail military blackmail and all the other feeling that the stakes have been raised is not very clear, there is than or not. it was said in this sense, something they heard even on the news aggregator. they posted full videos with

a subscript. by the way, this is the case i'll tell you exceptional for them, that is , they, of course, here's to this case to this case. have a closer look. they realized that it was not easy. so let's see, though, whether it will be deeper. because i would very much like the broad masses of american workers, so to speak, to hear what putin said, for example, on sensitive social and cultural issues, when he said, well , of course, we won’t go to you, but we’ll give up for our children in me. it is so consonant, for example, with the same people, vagai, who are there now they are pitting vinyl with chlorides, and at the same time they teach in schools, so to speak, e sex change, where minors are against it. what a terrible thing it got up there, well, on what, actually, the landing party got out. he got out there, mainly on the fact that he just started to fight this cultural liberal fascism. isn't it a number? why are you digging there? we

are going to give him the title of the righteous of the world to speak at 17:00 righteous