quite recently, who were exchanged for other american citizens and who were in ordinary us prisons and their evidence of the torture they were subjected to is at the moment. i mean, for example, the story of the same maria butina, who was in an ordinary prison, but was subjected to the same tortures that were in their special prisons. uh, the cia is a disgrace somehow does not fit into this scheme. here. eh, because. well, probably, even if people are a criminal or so on. they have the right to be treated in accordance with international laws and customs, these conventions, which have been signed by various countries. including the united states in such american pragmatism, that is, the end justifies the means. and if it does not violate the laws, and the laws are made in such a way that it is, perhaps it is permissible on foreign territory, because the americans turn a blind eye to this. i think that it's worth it

, there is a feeling that they created some kind of double double reality, something that really exists and about which no one he spoke and created some mythical wonderful discourse himself about how human rights should be observed and how international rules should be observed, only this is at the level of discourse, and not in practice cuba today. uh, in fact, the country is under blockade. uh, so her voice can't be heard. in any case, it is not heard, globally at the regional level, of course there are countries that are very sympathetic towards cuba, there are allies in latin america, but in principle, when you are a small country next door to a giant with a global hegemon is difficult, e,

reach out to the world community. so , of course, the base of the guantans as a whole and the prison. in particular, a great indignation survives the presence of these two things of one's own territory. ah, but what can cuba do in this situation, almost nothing

is used to watching videos , installing, opening movies and cartoons

alexander yatsenko now could save only soviet people, other fish, there is no yevgeny tkachuk fedor dobronravov four moves ahead sees sergey makovetsky pokhotunsky.

on february 28, 1991 , the persian gulf war ended, or as it is called in the united states , operation desert storm, the consequences of this war are still felt. no military success and political success, especially political success. this operation did not bring more than that, it led to the fact

that, in theory, the goals of military operations were revised. yes, the military was supplemented with a political dimension and it was shown that tough american policy is like that. she meets rather rejection from the countries of the middle east, and then i had some muslim countries are business trips, and i was convinced. how does an american generally oppose or oppose themselves. uh, most of humanity is about, uh, the current situation in iraq well, they let the wife out of the bottle , the formal reason for the start of the war was annexation, kuwait and cancer. against the backdrop of iraq's huge debt to kuwait, which accumulated during the years of the iranian war with the iraqi kuwait. this helped iraq a lot. and iraq, of course , had to pay the bills; they were

very dissatisfied with iraq and, in fact, cause something of war and occupation. kuwai. this is the proclamation of kuwait's nineteenth province. iraq historical grounds. they were in the ottomans for this. the period was the so-called bosophian billiards, which united the south formally included territorially administratively in the ottoman empire in the one that was included and forges, and the most important thing was not in this. why did saddam hussein take such a risky step? the fact is that relations between iraq and the united states were very good for a long time, but it also happens there absolutely. elite provocation a deliberate provocation by the americans during the eighties, when the main headache for the americans was iran after the victory. er, the revolution

of 1979 and, er, the united states actually stood and so forth behind iraq's back. when hostilities began between iraq and iran, they continued. they were very bloody for 8 years. and uh. saddam hussein most likely expected that he would find understanding in washington, he decided to consult with the united states ambassador, invited her for a conversation and said, here so and so we have a very difficult relationship develop squia there yes. what is the point of view of the united states and received such a response, the united states does not have a definite point of view on your conflict with the body. these are your inter-arab relations. you decide for yourself. you decide. saddam hussein and he made a decision . he took this conversation as a green light for an attack on kuwait, but it was a trap into which saddam

hussein gullibly fell into like that. now what motivated when the americans were motivated. well first, a big neighbor east, that was the official idea. and secondly, it is, of course, oil. the old slogan from american foreign policy smells of oil , no one canceled it, and another reason for america's desire to overthrow the regime of saddam hussein in may 1990 in baghdad was a summit meeting of leaders and states, and saddam hussein said at this meeting that you know the soviet union is in a terrible economic state, it urgently needs to provide assistance with loans on favorable terms to lend to the soviet union - this is our duty from the soviet union to help us for 10 years, and we should think about the fact that we had to get away from the dictates of the american dollar, go to settlements through the gold

dinar and, behold, this, too, was not forgotten in washington and in london, the security council adopted a resolution allowing the application of all having anti-cancer drugs. to liberate kuwait, on january 17, 1991, massive airstrikes were carried out on the territory of iraq, which continued until the end of february, more than a thousand aircraft were involved, but hmm, a very interesting detail is that mm president bush sr., who had great political experience. he, uh, left the era. eh, he kept the cancer moving, that is, the troops did not go to baghdad and saddam kept. uh, their army positions were crushed, but the state, as such, remained, which did not allow george w. bush to continue moving. i

think it was a wise president. one of , in my opinion, the most experienced politicians in washington in recent decades. he understood that they destroyed iraq, he would destroy the whole region, chaos would begin, and this happened after 2003. he apparently did not want to contribute. trouble in the middle east and of course, i didn’t want to break the delicate balance that existed in iraq in religious terms between shiites and sunnis, because the ruling group was the sunnis, and the majority of the population were shiites, and knocking down this hmm this sunni support of the state. uh, the americans and all the foundations of the state destroyed the main reasons.

e. since there, er, of course, officially these were the events of september 11, but in fact, as i see it, this is the promotion of the foreign economic interests of american corporations, and plus this is the elimination of objectionable modes. this is the second military action of hers today, it is quite possible to call it aggression, of course, uh, it was, in general, close to disaster. saddam hussein was believed to be supporting al-qaeda. although, he had an exceptionally antagonistic relationship with al-gaida and when the americans launched their attack on the officer corps, which consisted of a unit on the administrative apparatus and so on. eh, then eh, here. this

balance was disturbed and the country plunged into complete chaos for many years, and in the army of the sunnets there was a majority and all officers of all the generals were usually sunnis both in the party and thus. uh, all leadership cadres. they were subject to expulsion from the state apparatus. this was already an example. autizations in the middle east this was an example where the actions of the united states caused , uh, thousands of americans to die in the first place. there, most of the american military personnel were then treated, uh, they had such a severe syndrome. uh, psychological when the americans dropped a bomb on a bomb shelter on civilians. not all

shells hit military targets. civilian objects and houses were destroyed a thousand people died and unfortunately this picture never reached the american layman and the moment of sobering never came. and by the way, this is one of the reasons for the founding of isis and successful military operations. it turned out that in prisons and cancer were imprisoned by the americans. uh, officers, former sunnis and terrorist extremists, as a rule, imprisoned by saddam hussein. e, operating on the territory of iraq and it happened , as it were, here is their e. well, spike, they reached an understanding. they created an igil and they have done. there are so many high-profile cases in the region of the arab mainland. that is, this is a series of eraks. e, ivan i, in a certain sense , one can say, and that the result of this was

the terrorist attacks of 2001 in september in the united states, when suicide bombers attacked the twin towers precisely because it accumulated. uh, well, there is a huge rejection among the population of this one-sided germanist policy, the usa but what i say about the gulf war does not imply the protection of saddam from his son saddam hussein, by and large, he allowed gross miscalculation should not have done this. especially already having occupied a ditch. he made even more mistakes in kuwait. there is a museum of iraqi occupation. there are terrible exhibits. it shows photographs of the destroyed dwellings of the looted houses of the raped women. well, there is something that

allows muslim morality. uh, the iranian soldiers in kuwait behaved disgustingly. this is an undeniable fact. and, of course, saddam hussein here. eh, this is all that i have now listed so briefly enough. it all got into the world media and everything worked exactly in the interests of uh hmm national strength. the americans created a special interdepartmental working group on public diplomacy, which just tracked the impact of the conflict on the perception of the united states abroad and the results were reported directly to the president. i had to do this in the council of europe where, uh,

a committee was created. i was his chairman of the committee on the rights of journalists in the conditions of the crisis, and we raised this topic very much there, which means it makes sense. journalists deserve to be in the army and accordingly. to reflect the reality as it should be, if at the beginning let's say, uh, what we have here is called cargo 200 in america, they still met and somehow bush even gave away the first dead in iraq. uh, due to them there valor and so on, then this case was covered up, saying that it had a very negative impact on public opinion. what concerns our country. well, we tried after all to prevent a storm in the desert and more than once. uh, our representatives went there and negotiated with

uh, with adam hussein and so on with her. e, it means our ambassador, e, it is known for a spherical hatch that is not dead kissed, negotiated with him. and primakov met at home as a kusain, but there is also an absolutely obvious provocation , a deliberate provocation by the americans. it's a no-brainer. an outstanding diplomat, an outstanding political figure, and in his memoirs he writes about what russian diplomacy sought to prevent the beginning of this military operation. we understood that there was no good in political, economic or in humanitarian terms, the outbreak of hostilities will not lead, therefore, when an article appeared in nezrik magazine a few weeks ago that 87% of the world's population does not support the united states in ukraine, it did not become

completely clear. and clearly. these are the roots - this is, uh, here. uh, the consequences of that, uh aggressive militant policy to subjugate other countries along the path that the united states has been going from country to country for a long time and today all these attempts to prove that we uh maintain the world based on rules does not deceive anyone everyone says it gives fiction because behind the world built on the rules is your desire. e keep your hegemony to strengthen and continue indefinitely.

we will prepare for all contingencies, for russia to change course, they make money, that's all, and against russia or together with russia , the discussion is absolutely indifferent to prepare new packages of sanctions against russia, the fight against russia , today russia plays the first roles, plays on an equal basis with everyone strongest powers to world domination must control what will be tomorrow?

death there was one valuable relic in the family, then they raised it from me. you said you would return. this is the most expensive pipe in the world.

how and what happened to them in our story?

in general, i am a peaceful hacker pacifist, he was simply trained by foreigners. let 2014 for the most part of their activities focused on the psychological impact. we declared it will always be the object of attack.

and on defender of the fatherland day, vladimir putin laid a wreath at the tomb of the unknown soldier, and flowers were also laid on the alley of cities heroes and cities of military glory after the presidential ceremony i talked with veterans and combatants. he spoke in detail about the creation of a state fund to support participants in his. he promised to assign the status of veterans to all donbass militias and to consider additional guarantees for military priests. all the details. alexei petrov has a guard of honor. the military band sets the pace and mood.