but he was clearly not a liberal. kursky reproached the tsar for excessive despotism of autocracy . however, the russian state rested on autocracy. everything and the sovereign is my predecessor and model. i have always imagined him as a model of my government in civil and military affairs, but i have not yet managed to get as far as he is fools, only unknown circumstances in the time of his people and his great merits are lived by his teacher. peter said it absolutely. well , damn it, there will be such a device, in general, subsequent dissidents or human rights activists or liberals they more strive for one.

the destruction of the existing state is based on the rigid vertical of power of the tsars and queens after peter, and let's move on to the great truly great woman catherine ii , a foreigner by birth, she sincerely loved russia and cared for the welfare of her subjects, having taken the throne through a palace coup. she tried to bring to life the russian society, the best ideas of the european enlightenment. well, once ekaterina read an essay by an obvious liberal. radishcheva journey from st. petersburg to moscow and decided that he was worse than pugachev could have been followed by the death penalty, but the glory of god ended. why will we rewrite the enlightened monarchy with the voltaires by french philosophers? this is how i reacted to the book. because she understood that a well-aimed word is much more dangerous than the spontaneous rebel yan pugachev, who did not have clear goals and

was unable to unite the heterogeneous composition of catherine ii, she founded the shortcomings of the existing russian empire of the socio-political system, however, she considered it necessary to carry out a gradual transformation. radishchev, on the other hand , rocked the boat at the very moment when french society was trying to change its own scientific position in a revolutionary way. what threatened, much more severe consequences? that is, catherine stood guard over the interests of the country. so the great french revolution took place, which proclaimed the most liberal ideas of freedom of equality and fraternity. and that's where it started. it began, in fact, in europe in general, but these ideas brought special fruits in russia, yes, and how could it be otherwise, the most skin power, the most

a dense country, you need to wake up the people. shin catherine the emperor pavel understand that when introducing french ideas on russian soil will cause, well, not entirely acceptable results decided to toughen the regime, but the strength in the shoulder of anything character fell into extremes. he forbade them to travel abroad. your reading country books and wearing round hats, round tailcoat hats, and in general then associated with the hated french contagion. as it was customary to say, the prohibitions on leaving the country to read to them had all the same reasons for protecting people from the rotting west, and what is accustomed to the freedom of great-grandmother catherine, guards officers who heard something, elected people killed the emperor. well, they killed him without knowing it. now a true liberal, brought up by the swiss laharpe son of paul, the future

emperor alexander i, ascended the throne. he said everything would be like under his grandmother and began to carry out general reforms, but all the beautiful-hearted ideas of alexander i stumbled upon russian realities and ended up with doctors and military settlements of peasants. walked under the drum. slightly disliked seeing in peace during the fatherland of the war , the decembrists appeared on the scene as an army and guards officer, what the children did not want were different , not quite about the form in general, but without conditions and liberal in the first place. the overthrow of the king and the destruction of the state, the time was right between the kingdom is the king, here the throne is a pretext for civil war. well, and then there is the victory over bone tsarism and the onset of universal happiness. on the table

to serve the sovereign and russia the words of miloranovichi, addressed to the troops on the senate square there are the words of the empire to its citizens. miloradovich on senate square was the end of the decembrist movement on the rebels there is the answer of the empire to people who want her death went to the king to give an unambiguous assessment of the kingdom of nicholas i is impossible. reserves appeared and the slavophils believed that russia should be equal to

the european powers, they went and protested against imitators. direction exists it young men of ten and eighteen years old were not allowed to be brought up abroad. his autonomy was seriously limited. so what? there were no liberal revolutionary movements destroying the country, unlike the next extremely liberal tsar alexander ii , alexander's reforms are called great . and here the liberals and alexander ii turned around, a

worthwhile hunt was arranged . on february 5, in short, the ninth year, khalturin carried out an explosion in the winter palace of the journal of which the emperor was not injured, although several dozen people killed early, khalturin was hanged, but this did not help. on the first of march more than the first year, the group, probably more, was illuminated by the assassination attempt on alexander ii by bombing, during which the emperor had been mortally earlier. is this possible called the liberator of the king will destroy those who considered themselves the best representatives of the people. perhaps they are guided by liberal ideas, they are not compatible with the idea of ​​​​autocratic power, five, on march 1, zhelyabov in perovskaya, kibalchish mikhailov rashakov, were hanged.

alexander iii won the war against human terrorism, he issued a manifesto, they live autocracy and launched a number of counter-reforms that were aimed at curtailing liberal reforms. however, liberals. they just don't give up on march 1, already the eighty-seventh year was an unsuccessful attempt on the life of alexander iii under the leadership. sherevo. alexandra ulyanova alexander the revolutionary terror in russia stopped for almost 15 years the tsar's counter-reforms bore fruit. nicholas ii at that time, the rapid development of industry and the government , actively went through all the reforms related to this, he began an agrarian reform, which was supposed to secure the land for peasant

owners, however, in april 1902. the murderer of the minister of internal affairs sipyatin declared himself fighting organization of socialists the evolutionists of the sirs, under the leadership of boris salenkov, members of the military organization, committed the murder of the minister of the interior plevius, the murder of grand duke sergei alexandrovich , an extremely left-wing crooked sherov. the maximalists committed the murder of stolypin why because the strengthening of the state of the researcher of the tsarist single power went against the liberal ideas of the jerusalemites, and the investigators with the teas of the people. what's next next vralskaya bourgeois revolution, which made up nikolai, they crack the throne by whom it was committed, but not by the bolsheviks, the bolsheviks were sitting in switzerland, they were liberals from the inner circle of the tsar from the duma

and even relatives of the emperor. it is interesting that immediately after the disappearance of the monarch of the holding state. the pivotal side began to fall apart in march 1917, the provisional government of russia recognized the right to independence. poland of the great finland for the caucasus, the kuban army and the siberian republic separated and, of course, ukraine was cleaned by the bolsheviks as a result of the civil war. all these lands were returned to soviet russia however. after the break with the bolsheviks, the socialist-revolutionaries were killed by the commissar for the press of soviet russia, the volodarsky autonomous soviet socialist republic, as a plan, shot at lenin, even the new government did not suit the real liberals. of course, i could be wrong in my judgments. but i am sure that vera

zasulich and savinki will stand at the end of the most peaceful liberalism, because in the conditions of our motherland, liberalism is aimed at the destruction of the existing state, which came from the bolsheviks. they wanted to set fire to the world fire, using russia. like a match, this already threatened the very existence in russia and the glory of the russian people of the boyars is not the greatest faith. god appeared a man who thought differently was not a liberal at all. who began to build the russian empire is not afraid of this word. mi and a complete economic society a country in the world and when he died, or rather, he was killed, nikita sergeevich khrushchev

made every effort to denigrate stalin to assert his own power. but at the same time, he was killing the idea that held together the country of the odious nikita was quickly removed, but the faith of the socialist idea was shaken, making room for liberal views at first timidly among the moscow intelligentsia to a large extent in that part that survived the tragedy of fathers and grandfathers. at the end of the thirtieth years experienced a fair sense of revenge on the wave of the famous policeman accompanied by liberal ideas. the thaw became possible due to the loss of faith in communist ideals among party and government officials as well. dissidents appeared, that is, people professing liberal ideals, the movement expanded , the moscow celtic group arose, and then, under the shadow of the oldest brezhnev, liberal ideas they argued, and now, to the delight of all liberals

, past and present , the founder of all liberal reforms, the father of russian democracy, appears on the historical stage. gorbachev mikhail sergeevich it was the victory of the liberals , perestroika begins cool acceleration. in addition, gorbachev, his associates began to use the most important liberal concepts of general human values. recognizing the state as a value of the market, they said that in the ussr it is necessary to approve the socialist market with the russian federation socialist constitutional state. reforms - this is an example of how good intentions lead to hell. so buy the tower in labor income was understood, as the struggle with the sellers of homemade cakes sellers of flowers, rehearsing drivers

threw random passengers in the same curiosity was the alcohol company from the store most of the alcoholic beverages disappeared, which led to home self-ignition and numerous poisonings. in addition, it dealt a powerful blow to the economy to punch it in the budget of a colossal hole, which then contributed to the introduction coupons. remember the benchmark. no, this is from there. private entrepreneurship and market relations were legalized. however , the most successful soviet entrepreneurs were representatives of crime, who were engaged in closer than long before perestroika and brought criminal production relations to the sphere of legal business. successful reforms require power, and power was slipping away . management

china took a different path, they began to change the economy within the existing system, without denigrating it, and this allowed them to save the state, unlike the ussr or an economic disaster. turned into a political disaster. but for our liberals, gorbachev is a light in the window gorbachev's choice is amazing and in his work he is comparable only to alexander ii, who abolished serfdom, said the liberal leonid gosman. well, there is another point of view the ban of the state duma ivan melnikov said gorbachev showed absolute without characterization of indistinctness, not decisiveness, and the main word by which this politician remembered that this word was a traitor, however, to change. gorbachev

appeared much more decisive. although come here sober liberal yeltsin in the ninetieth year, yeltsin ran for the people's deputies of the russian federation. during the meeting with voters , the following point of his election program was announced to grant independence to all national autonomies, the right to approve new emotional territorial entities anti-indigenous the majority of the population. that is the dismemberment of the country. here it is a liberal idea in action, we miss a lot of what happened from president boris nikolayevich, remember the main belovezhskaya pushcha and the collapse of the soviet union that happened through his fault and will, as the current president of russia putin said that the collapse of the ussr became a tragedy and the collapse of historical russia, the state

lost 40% of the territory production capacity and population, as well as what has accumulated over the thousand years. and everything began to crumble and the steering wheel began when they destroyed, most importantly, they destroyed the soviet union that very country yes, practically invincible, in short, it was possible only from the inside, that's how it was done. and the pinnacle of this was the liberal idea in a straight line, expressed. uh, yeltsin he went to america in congress, what i said, god bless america so there's nowhere to go. it means that even the most peaceful efforts of gaidar and the company were aimed at the destruction of the existing russian

state for the role of subordinating the government of the liberal gaidar. why because implementation democratic order leads to the automatic destruction of our great state. just because of his device. it unites different peoples and candy said one of the characteristic features of the historical development of russia, the nature and structure of political power, necessary to maintain theatrical value and political stability, that the imperial space was, in principle, incompatible with civil liberties and independence of individual population groups. this was said by alexander kamensky, professor of the higher school the economy of the institution is absolutely liberal, but in this i completely agree with him. the transformation of opinions within the decision-making center leads to the disintegration of a single state. and what is it like to remember the nineties, even if only a slight indication of

what is really the collapse of a country with atomic weapons and a tightly bound economy. so there is no way out in russia, the tsar-father, like 500 and 300 years ago. now there is no idea, where to go next, my friends, but you think after the collapse of the country after

the nineties, she has thousands of lives, the great the liberal idea has faded away, no matter how roughly vladimir putin held a meeting of the council for the development of civil society and human rights via videoconference, sokurov suggested to me that , uh, the federation of russians is starting to dislike us more and more, they want to part with us. many do not want to be in the same company, as they say, let's let go of everyone who no longer wants to live with us in the same state, that is, the separation of national regions from russia. where did shakurov get this from? what who wants to leave the squad putin's russian federation reminded that the election results of the recent referendum evidence of our people will let go of everyone who does not want to live with us. how do you know

who wants to live with us? and who doesn’t want to, you can discuss this matter as you like now and for as long as you like, but i assure you that the vast majority of people understand what they will face, if, uh, they act, they still offer to check it in a different way , that is, it is simply out of the blue to appoint referendums in each region in order to find out if they want to leave the federation or not? indeed , it will be a unique phenomenon if the state itself invites citizens to discuss with the operational idea it does not have any prerequisites, that is, the country collapsed just like they ruined the sir. by the way, he offered to give it to the japanese. no, you don't understand them more than liberals. these civilizations of mine are a fetish for them and are not available, and as you can’t see in front of her, the lord will only tell you recognition from europe in her

eyes. you will always be no servant. enlightenment akhalopych. i approve i'm ready prove that none of the movements of the people. i could not imagine the further structure of russia after the successful liberation from sole power. the main thing was for all the former reformers to destroy the existing regime, the current liberals want a greater division of russia into small national ones, and not only education completely controlled by our former partners, if earlier the russian liberals had not yet thought publicly about the things the russian people, it was that the goals and tasks facing, well russian liberal irrefutability acts about what exactly, that's what he thinks, by the way, freemen confidently and again , despite the statement about the absence in russia he

can say whatever he wants , the liberals must learn that democracy is not the peoples of power can lead to fascism and communism democracy. this is the power of another people who are ready to gather under the holy known liberalism, this is a modern liberal with all the strength of his soul he hates existing russia and wishes her defeat, example kiselyov, you know , he said that every russian should wish the defeat of the russian army, you need to support ukraine and wish her victory in this war, respectively, wish the defeat of his army, including. a defeat to those mobilized to whom someone expresses touching

sympathy this man talked to his people on tv and imposed his opinion, and it is not lost, believe me, for many you lost your hands from our failures with onion laughter. i listened to things when the regiments ran galloping the banner of our honor pushkin about him in military uniform on ukrainian television no this man is here in the military uniform of ukraine or there and organized troops russian troops fighting against us, the vlasovites, the case of traitors continues. let's hope the end will be the same. what does not know your hung? if the past russian liberals are only russia, the alexandrian past of the present

, then modern russian liberals have gone ahead and rattle all past russia as its achievement such that real russia and especially its victories, all the future of russia, citizens are constantly liberal flights according to western patterns. here and now liberals combined with the adjective russian has nothing to do with national affiliation some of the sight, but only to their place of residence. yes, and sharpen russian liberals. there are non-russian liberals, because they do not have a homeland, so they consider themselves a cosmopolitan. hates russian people. there he considers him a redneck, he hates the past, the present future of russia, as i understand it, that here nothing corny shines for him. russian liberalism does not attack russians. our liberal has reached the point where he denies russia itself, that is, he hates and beats his mother, every unfortunate unfortunate

russian fact excites me to laughter. almost not rapture, he hates russian customs , russian history. all if there is an excuse for this only in the fact that he does not understand what the lord should do, even such words as love for the fatherland have become ashamed. you understand the very concept of banished as harmful and insignificant, and this fact is true, but at the same time one that has never been or happened anywhere in any country. are liberal ideas at all? no , of course, in our country, given the complex device. i would like to be careful now, as viktor speransky stolypin introduced them and we also wanted to develop it unconditionally by a number of great figures of russia, but now we are faced with one task - victory in the war. victory absolutely definitely carrying out the necessary

reforms in accordance with the demand from above and preferably thank you all.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. it's always interesting how it all

starts. now everyone will see the manufacturers of good things want and but the best thing to check.

main news by this hour ukrainian troops are shelling donetsk in the morning five shells of nato caliber. in the evening , russia welcomes the chinese plan for a peaceful settlement of the situation in ukraine about this russian organization. but the west according to him .