our duty is to serve the sovereign and russia , the words of miloradovich addressed to the troops on senate square are the words of the empire addressed to its citizens. shot miloradovich on senate square was the end of the decembrist movement. it is impossible to give an unambiguous assessment of the kingdom of nicholas. some say, but the most important stage in the development of the country, others would have been an ultra-revolutionary era, but even here something happened liberal reserves believed that russia should be equal to the european powers against

imitators exist. i remember the decembrists he young men of ten and eighteen years old were not allowed to be brought up abroad. the autonomy of universities for enrollment was limited. well, what about liberal revolutionary movements destroying the country, unlike the next extremely liberal tsar alexander ii, alexander’s reform is called great abolition of serfdom judicial reform education reform zemstvo reform, military reform activity of alexander ii was directed to scrapping, settled in order, which led to a burst of social activity. and here are the liberals and turned around the same alexander the second was arranged, worth hunting three attempts to arrange,

the wreck of the royal train were made very much in 1879. the february gas khalturin carried out an explosion in the winter palace, the expectation of which the emperor did not suffer, even if several dozen people were killed early. halturing was hanged, but it could not. on march 1, 81, a group and truckers covered an attempt on alexander ii by bombing, during which the emperor was mortally wounded. is it possible that this is called the liberator of the king will destroy those who believed themselves the best representatives of the people, perhaps they were guided by liberal ideas, they are poorly compatible with the idea of ​​autocratic authorities, five, on march 1, perovskaya zhelyabov kibalchish mikhailov rusakov were hanged. alexander iii won the war on terrorism

, he laid the manifesto, they kept alive and launched a whole series of counter-reforms, which were aimed at curtailing liberal reforms. however, liberals. they don’t give up so easily, on march 1, already in 1987 , an unsuccessful attempt was made to assassinate alice alexander iii under the leadership of the seam alexander ulyanov was, the hanged terror in russia stopped for almost 15 years counter- reforms, sorry, have borne fruit. well, the new tsar nicholas ii came to the throne at that time, the sluggish development of industry and the government actively contributes to this all the reforms associated with the name of the minister of finance, the appearance and the prime minister's pants. he began an agrarian reform, which was supposed to secure land for peasant

owners. however, in april 1902, by the assassination of the minister of the interior, sipyatin, the combat organization of the socialists of the evolutionaries of the ussr, under the leadership of the battles of savikov, members of the military organization declared itself, committed the murder of the minister of the interior, the tribe , the murder of the grand duke sergei alexandrovich , the extreme left curve of the balls, in general, you pray , they committed the murder of stolypin why because the strengthening of the state of the researcher of royal power liberal ideas, but investigators of the people. what's next next the february bourgeois revolution, which made nicholas crack from the throne by whom it was accomplished, but not by the bolsheviks, the bolsheviks were sitting in switzerland; these were liberals from the inner circle of the tsar from the duma and even relatives of the emperor. it is interesting that

immediately after the disappearance of the monarch of the holding state. the core of the country began to fall apart in march of the seventeenth year, the interim government of russia recognized the right to independence of poland, the grand duchy of finland , the kuban army and the siberian republic separated from the caucasus and , of course, ukraine clean the bolsheviks as a result of the civil war all these lands were returned to soviet russia however. after the break with the big ones, there was the commissar for the press of soviet russia, volodarsky alshar, as atlant shot at lenin, even the news of real liberals did not suit. of course, i could be wrong in my reasoning. but i am sure that vera zasulich will stand at the end of the most peaceful liberalism. and savinkov, because in the conditions of our motherland

, liberalism is aimed at destroying the existing state, which came from the bolsheviks. they wanted to set fire to the world fire, using russia as a match, it was already threatened the very existence in russia of the non-russian people of the boyars is not the greatest, glory. god appeared a man who thought differently was not a liberal at all. he is tired and very serious, who began to build the russian empire, i am not afraid of this word. mi fucking officers of the patriarchy and the complete absence, well , did not become the second economic society country in the world and when he died, or rather, he was killed sergeevich khrushchev made the maximum.

at the same time, he killed the idea that held together the country of the odious nikita was quickly removed, but vera the socialist idea hesitated, giving room for liberal views at first timidly among the moscow intelligentsia to a large extent in that part that survived the tragedy of fathers and grandfathers. in the late thirties experienced a fair sense of revenge on the wave of the famous policeman born liberal ideas. the thaw became possible due to the loss of faith in communist ideals among party and government officials as well. the dissidents showed, that is, people who did not profess liberal ideals, the movement spread to anyone of the moscow celtic group and further along liberal ideas were affirmed by reading the oldest brezhnev, and now, to the delight of all liberals

of the past and present , the founder of all liberal sins, the father of russian democracy, appears on the historical stage. gorbachev mikhail sergeevich it was the victory of the liberal , the restructuring of classrooms and acceleration begins. in addition, gorbachev and his like-minded people began to use the most important liberal concepts of common human values. recognizing the market as public values , purerism is pursuing the state, they said that in the ussr it is necessary to approve the socialist market of socialist pedalism is a socialist legal state. gorbachev's reforms - this is an example of how good intentions lead to hell, so the fight against non-earned income was understood, as the fight against home baking sellers, flower sellers of the tutor and drivers threw random passengers at the same curious was the alcohol company

from the store most of the alcoholic beverages disappeared, which led to home cooking and numerous poisonings. in addition, the most powerful blow to the economy is the penetration of b the budget of a colossal hole, which the offspring of the running coupons remember. private enterprise and the market are not relations however, the most successful soviet entrepreneurs were representatives of criminals, who were engaged in closer than long before perestroika and brought criminal production relations to the sphere of legal business. power is needed for successful reforms, and power slipped away. this is because several reforms were simultaneously launched in the hour of the reform of the political system, the state collapsed. management

china took a different path, they began to change the economy within the existing system, without denigrating it, and this allowed them to save the state. unlike the ussr , an economic catastrophe turned into a political catastrophe. but for our liberals, gorbachev is a light in the window gorbachev's choice is amazing and in his activities he is comparable only to alexander ii, who abolished serfdom, he said, a liberal, leonidzhman. well, there is another point of view, the ban of the state duma ivan melnikov said gorbachev showed absolutely no character intelligibility, not decisiveness, and the main word by which these were remembered was the word traitor. appeared much more resolute,

although they are always sober yeltsin's liberal in the 90th year, yeltsin ran for people's deputies. rsfer. enter the meeting with voters was announced the next point of his election program to grant independence to all national autonomies the right to approve new emotional territorial entities of the same-indigenous population is the majority. that is, the articulation of the country? that's the liberal idea. we miss a lot of what happened to president boris nikolayevich, we remember the main belovezhskaya pushcha and the collapse of the soviet union that happened through his fault and will, as the current president of russia putin said that the collapse of the ussr became a tragedy and the collapse of historical russia, the state lost 40% of the territory of production

capacities and population, and also that which has been accumulating for a thousand years. and everything began to collapse and the steering wheel began when they destroyed, most importantly, they destroyed the soviet union that very country yes, practically invincible, which could only be defeated from within. this is how it was done and the pinnacle of it was the liberal idea in a straight line, expressed. uh, yeltsin he went to america in congress a hundred i said god bless america so there's nowhere to go. it means that even the most peaceful efforts of gaidar and the company were aimed at the destruction of the existing russian state for the role of subordinating the government of the liberal gaidar. why because the introduction

of democratic orders leads to the automatic destruction of our great states. just because of his device. it unites different peoples and candy said one of the characteristic features of the historical development of russia , the nature and structure of political power necessary to maintain the territorial integrity and political stability of such a vast imperial space were, in principle, incompatible with civil liberties and the independence of individual population groups. alexander kamensky, a professor at the higher school of economics, said this to an absolutely liberal institution, but here i am with him completely agree. the transformation of opinions within the decision-making center leads to the disintegration of a single state. and what is it like to remember the nineties, even if only a slight indication of what is really

the collapse of a country with atomic weapons and a tightly bound economy. so there is no way out in russia, the tsar-priest, as 500 and 300 years ago it was possible, but the idea that holds the state together is better, as was the new world of another person. and this idea was held together by the country helped win the war . hitler thought that nationality was not collapsed moreover, this idea was attractive to peoples. now there is no idea, where to go next, my friends, but you think that after the collapse of the country after the nineties

, it has thousands of lives, the great liberal idea has faded away. no matter how it was, putin held a meeting of the council for the development of civil society and human rights, which sakurov proposed, via videoconference. it seems to me that, uh, the federation of russians are starting to dislike us more and more , they want to part with us. many do not want to be in the same company, as they say, let's let's release everyone who no longer wants to live with us in the same state, that is, we mean the separation of national regions from russia. where did shakurov get this from? who wants to secede from the russian federation, putin reminded that the results of the recent referendum elections are evidence of our people , we will let go of everyone who does not want to live with us. how do you know who wants to live with us? and

who does not want to, you can discuss this matter as you like now and for as long as you like, but i assure you that the overwhelming most people understand what they're going to face, if uh, they act differently , they suggest checking it out anyway, just out of the blue , call referendums in every region to see if they want to secede from the federation or not? indeed , it will be a unique phenomenon if the state itself invites citizens to discuss a political idea that does not have any prerequisites for this, that is, the country collapsed just like they ruined sir. by the way, he offered to give the islands to the japanese to smoke. no, you don't understand them. what was chosen. these civilizations of mine are a fetish for them and are not available, and her ideas, as you can’t see in front of her, lord, you won’t win recognition from europe in her eyes. you will

always not servants of the nickname. i affirm and am ready to prove that none of the movements is for special divisions of the people. i could not imagine the further structure of russia after the successful liberation from sole power. the main thing for all former reformers was to destroy the existing regime, the current liberals want more, the division of russia into small national ones, and not only education completely controlled by our former partners, if earlier the russian liberals had not yet thought of publicly depending on the russian people, it was that there are goals and tasks facing, well, the russian liberal does not hold pressure indicates that this is exactly what he thinks, by the way, the free are convinced and again, despite the assertion in the absence of arbitrariness in russia. he can say whatever he

wants, the liberals should really. are you democracy, this is not the power of the peoples of the kind of power that can lead to fascism and communism , democracy is the power of another people, who is ready to gather under the saint knew liberalism, these are modern liberals with all the strength of their souls they hate existing russia and wish it to be defeated. example kiselyov , you know, he said that every russian should wish the defeat of the russian army, you need to support ukraine and wish her victory in this war, respectively, wish defeat his army, including. defeat to those mobilized to whom someone expresses touching sympathy, this person communicated to his on

tv and imposed his opinion, and believe me, it was not lost for many lost from of our failures with a sly laugh. he listened to things when the regiments ran galloping the banner of our honor pushkin in military uniform on ukrainian television he is in the military uniform of ukraine and he organized the russian troops, the vlasovites fighting against us, the work of the traitors continues let's hope the end will be the same. and what does not know your premises? if the past russian liberals are only russia , the decided past of the present, then modern

russian liberals have gone ahead and thunder all past russia as its achievement is such the real russia, and especially its victories, all the future in russia, citizens are constantly on liberal flights according to western patterns. here and now, liberals combined with the adjective russian has nothing to do with the national affiliation of the worldview, but only with the place of one's residence. and even then relatively russian liberals. there are non-russian liberals, because they do not have a homeland, so they consider themselves a cosmopolitan. hates russian people. so he thinks he hates cattle. russians liberalism attacks not russian customs, but russia itself. our liberal has reached the point where he denies russia itself, that is, he hates and beats his mother. every unfortunate, unfortunate russian fact arouses laughter in him.

almost rapture, he hates russian customs , russian history. all if there is an excuse for this only in the fact that he does not understand what to do with the lord, even such words as love for the fatherland have become ashamed. you understand the very concept of exiled as harmfully insignificant. and this fact is true, but at the same time such that nowhere in any country has never been and never happened. does liberalism at all? no, of course, in our country, given the complex structure, i would like it to be implemented with caution, like speransky stolypin and a number of other great figures of russia, we wanted to develop it unconditionally, but now we face one task victory in the war. victory absolutely unconditionally well, why, of course, carrying out the necessary reforms in accordance

with the demand from above and desirable? thank you all. loan potential for business find out the available amount loan without opening an account and documents and get a loan at a reduced rate of 3%. we are trusted by millions of entrepreneurs.

with discounts up to 60% free shipping in the office, too, would be nice. avito well, a very large selection of vacancies to make prospects a reality. get a credit card for 120 days without interest from uralsib bank at a low rate of 9.5% per annum and free service for every new client. we will refund up to 5,000 rubles. on the map uralsib prospects where you are krasnoyarsk economic forum 2023 siberia time world

experts representatives of business authorities launch pad for large-scale projects. and if you like bonuses and fast delivery. download scooter app log up to 99% of orders.

we will prepare for all contingencies, for russia to change course they make money, that's all, and against russia or together with russia it is absolutely indifferent, we are in intensive discussion, to prepare new packages of sanctions against russia, this is a geopolitical struggle against russia russia is playing today plays the first roles on a par with all the strongest powers. whoever strives for world domination should control eurasia . the main western analysts are afraid of cooperation, rallying china and russia knows what will happen tomorrow, here it is necessary.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. always wondering where it all starts? now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and most importantly, but it is best to check.

a film by andrei medvedev, a big game of intelligence of diplomats and military of the russian british empire and geopolitical rivalry is already in today, on a hot

june morning in 1842, a small group of local residents silently looked at two men kneeling before the creator and peace of bukhara. 4,000 miles away, two british officers, colonel charles tort and captain arthur, died. world british confrontation in the struggle for control international politics in

world affairs there are no permanent friends or permanent enemies, and we play the same game no permanent enemies no permanent friends. an incredible story of espionage, diplomatic and military confrontation the clash between the two powers of western historiography is called the big game