the inability of the final irrevocably strangle russia causes hysteria in the west. they rush between a promising war to the last ukrainian and the eternal desire to change power in russia , the russophobe bit itself demands to supply the kiev regime with any weapon, regardless of the consequences, official

washington is trying by hook and crook to win over our closest neighbors, even political corpses from our so -called non-systemic opposition . then the passage through them to the russians, as the great good is trying to convey the main goal, but what kind of goal, and we are well aware, according to vladimir putin, this idea in the west has been in ours for a long time and it sounds like this. they have a goal to skew the former soviet union and its main part of the russian federation of peoples, but only separately. you see, each part separately for what in order to push these parts around and take control if we go this way? i think that the fate of very many peoples in russia, and above all, of course, the russian people, can change dramatically. well just

in a drastic way. i don’t even know if such an ethnic group as the russian people can survive in the form in which it exists today, well, there will be some urals muscovites and so on. well, it's all in the plans were these plans. they are on paper. it's just that we are in the conditions of building relationships. e. try to talk about it from e, no matter how partner considerations do not talk about it. well, that's it, it's all written on a piece of paper, everything is written. but now, when their attempts to remake after e, since the head of the soviet union, the world is exclusively under the door, that's up to such a situation. well , of course it responds. in general, it seems to me that we did not pay enough attention to the military ratio. well, for example, look. we see how the western native has changed. this is the same west said that western politicians that russia planned to destroy ukraine

to destroy the ukrainian people to take. which of the 3 days of the president of the russian federation on the 24th set a completely different task? a completely different task there too. speaking of territories , it was about protecting the lpr, dpr. yes, we are not close there was talk about the destruction of ukraine as a state, especially nowhere in a hundred. no words of disrespect for the ukrainian people have ever been expressed, this has never happened at all, but the west invents the most developed fairy tales, despite the fact that the west all the time throws these narratives into the territory from russia failed what failed? in a year of hostilities , we liberated a territory equal to four territories of crimea europe under 4 million. we freed, who now

live on their territories 7-8 million people. what the launch was counting on, they never hid. remember how some article appeared in a major one, there was an appeal to the oligarchs to arrange for the state. who communicates with him let him sit behind his twelve, when he gives strange orders, they need to act, they need to act for the good of russia to them. it is necessary to stop him turned summer, physical or

psychological problems that he had or that he acquired in any way. we do not know on his behavior is dangerous for the future of russia i hope that people who are close enough to him are insane behavior. russia it is interesting how they get excited about russia , how they make sure that the oligarchs against whom sanctions were imposed were a warning, but it turned out that the oligarchs no longer exist as a class of big businessmen and are not going to do this. and those people who consider themselves friends of putin and turned out to be friends of putin and this year not

only did not turn away, but, on the contrary, showed his determination to do everything necessary for the victory of our people, and then the appeal begins. now the people of russia did not succeed with the oligarchs. now let's go through the people while doing this. what's curious. why, biden, speaking in rasshava, says that we are not enemies of the russian people in the same warsaw, various bastards sit for money. and in particular, the bastard, ponomarev i want you to understand, i remember this scoundrel, when he did not climb out of the kremlin offices there was no ass in the kremlin. offices of the presidential administration, which he would not he tried to kiss that he would get the position of mayor of the very city from which he dismantled . he just dreamed about it, to whom the authorities threw it like a piece.

there, just shut up the corrupt creatures on you, when these lectures in skolkovo and then the money was stolen from the bastard, grandfather, an outstanding person, i take a member of the firing squad, where are you, where is your cousin second cousin or not, mother, not a cousin his senator was the same it's time for yukasan. who was she from whom? and nothing there, well, that we we all understood, you understand? yes, yes, and now this, aphid absolutely, who said that it was his personal merit in the death of dagina. not only does it trample. at the same time, well, what he said, biden is absolutely a training manual. well, you can clearly see where it was rewritten from. these are the times of the great patriotic war. look at the people of the soviet union do not let the stalinist oprichnik kvd fighter detachments burn your houses, your bread, your people's

factories, stalin before his flight abroad. decided to rob you one last time. do not allow this, we are not fighting against the peoples of the ussr, but against the criminal jewish stalinist power. we fight for your liberation for freedom of religion for the emancipation of workers with the release of 7 million people in prisons, which is blood of steel, when they are seared in camps and prisons for the freedom of free labor even of private life for everyone. well, well, right for biden. at the same time, i do not like it when they forget about the health of our president. that is, it would not hurt clinton to talk to a doctor at all, whom obama personally knows well, he probably did manipulation to her more than once, which warns that byte's cognitive decline will lead the us straight to war and russia well,

what are the options? ronnie jackson it's terrible for the country that bytes are our commander in chief half the time. he does not even realize where he is every day, pushes us closer and closer to the total arenets of russia and china due to the decline of his cognitive functions, people will die. here's what fox news anchor brian keith says. the main theme of this week is stumbling and best illustrated by our president. here he falls again, climbing the grass his stumble does not have a much deeper symbolic meaning. what do you think and symbolize they are the way we all and our countries have been doing for most of the two years that he is in power. we stumble all over the world stage. yes, so what do i do? and you, probably, too, for the rest of your life to see this. we have not yet had to take, for example, the middle east of the main problem there, at least in my memory, i have always been happy. now we 're showing weakness, begging them to get back to that awful nuclear deal. of course, they refused to do this at an accelerated pace. enrich uranium a. in addition, they also began

to help russia, another example of afghanistan, it has always been a difficult issue, but for the last 20 years, at least it has not been a resort for terrorists. why did everything change, but because joe left the country it became a terrorist state. and now we have also left them weapons so that they can protect their terrorist way of life, we will be transported to europe to the continent that is sealed from death and destruction like that we have not seen russia for 80 years a year ago. fighting against ukraine, a country that we did not begin to arm and which, according to our forecasts , should have been quickly defeated, the biden guys are still trying to supply the president zelensky with the weapons he needs to win. he is just enough not to lose. it is not normal. china has always been a competitor, but now it has become a clear rival of the enemy. whose bellicose behavior is clearly confirmed by only one collision with us is no longer possible, it is inevitable. so we seem to suddenly have control over what happens outside of our borders, but it has caused many to turn their attention and their claims abroad for the first time in a long time and ask themselves. and how are we doing inside the country, what is there in our backyard under normal presidents, that is, under

most of them , it was not necessary to choose between domestic and foreign policy , you need to work in both of these areas. so why, then, because of joe biden, it began to seem to us that we could not do anything, why did biden fail to solve several problems at the same time, in order to protect our citizens and raise their spirits, or at least achieve success in one of these areas, personally, i think that the whole thing is simply in his not lousy leadership qualities, the always stumbling biden has developed. physical imbalance in the rank of political features of our country, but there is good news. we didn't drop us. we just stumbled. we've got plenty of time to rise up and dust ourselves off and give you back your superpower status, but there's a question. should we wait for joe to leave for this, and if the question is, what will you do poseidon? there is a simple question, when your megalomania ends a little bit and look at what you have achieved from above, you got in the ass in afghanistan you got in the ass. in iraq, you fled from syria, fled from many african countries, what can you give

to ukraine what can you say to ukraine to prevent the appearance of the straits of a comrade, stalin or anything, so wake up and when you say colossal cruelty. yeah, remember what you did in iraq on march 5 , 2010, the bastard gordon brown called the invasion of iraq was the right decision, it was the right decision. he told the prime minister. those who were on the payroll of the minister of finance or captain gordon now award the random state of a special commission enough that the persian war flooded with it the lives of millions of people. now this pallet says that putin should be judged because the colossal victims in ukraine are by the way.

the name of the dead will be announced in their political position, where and by whom they were killed, the year has passed , the plant continues to lie. so tell me, please, what was the end of the investigation shooting, 9 years have passed on the maidan, of course, on may 2, the driver, but they shouted all right, it was a matter for the ukrainian authorities, but the gucci investigation attracted louis de fenesa and excuse the french police , they attracted british experts, according to forensic examination. they gave a report that most of the bodies that were sent to the study were killed by the use of artillery, that is, no executions. with what i was told the worm, although it is obvious that it was ukrainian in terms of the damaging elements that were discovered, but the west repeats it is no coincidence that today sergeevich lavrov has once again dotted everything.

indeed, until recently, a couple of years ago, the very external conditions that we need for development were not determined by us, but were determined by the western minority, the so-called golden billions, which advances all its foreign policy initiatives with the sole goal of making the whole world live by the rules that allow the golden billion to continue the colonial policy that allows the west to continue live at the expense of others. therefore, we will no longer rely on someone when it comes to creating the external conditions for development we need, at the moment it is being decided, as the president of the configuration of the future world order said.

based on the results, which will determine the place of russia in the democratic, fair, polycentric system, which is now being formed and which does not and cannot have an alternative, and i want to emphasize once again, we managed not only to frustrate the plans of the collective west to isolate, or even dismember russia, but also to ensure progressive progressive cooperation, with the vast majority of members of the international community. we now call it the world majority. here with this world majority. we have closer and more effective ties. well, before discussing any serious things. sorry, i just can’t get past this, but whose cow would moo about the state of health, but hillary clinton’s cow would be silent, because it’s hard, sick with very serious

psychiatric deviations by women who don’t have to get out on tv and don’t v policy to try to return through the rear kiltso, as arkady savchenko said, but you need to take care of your health. this is a hard and long seriously ill person, in general it is very interesting. they really agree. they all m-m what they care about. at first they begin to ascribe and test on others, but they were also concerned about the need to legalize nuclear weapons and the possibility of a breakthrough withdrawal from the agreement on limiting strategic attacks on their weapons there. huge opportunities actually very within weeks, actually, and they will double its non-nuclear potential is coming. well, to whom did they first rewrite this desire?

use nuclear weapons the desire to act aggressively in the nuclear sphere in the nuclear sphere is the same for us, look. they have a deeply mentally ill political elite. i think that dr. sosnovsky will not let you lie there , it has become much more difficult to find a healthy person in the american political elite than even 10-12 years ago. they are all in their manias and here, of course, we must be very careful about the idea. hmm i must say the struggle of narratives. how would we, well us it seems that we cannot defeat them in the information sphere. yes, it is very difficult for america to use its absolute superiority. e in control over the communication channel. they have it, but this does not mean that there is no opportunity to communicate. after all, the problem lies in the fact that when

we do not start up our narrative, not in response to them , we begin to lie, but our constructive narrative. and then this empty place, it does not remain. empty there comes their ideas or go and our quasi-allies or on the idea of ​​people who want to warm their hands, firstly, we should not fail to notice that third forces are already beginning to appear on the information and world information platforms, which are already beginning to consider the issue. and what exactly will they have if there is a direct clash, and russia of the united states and these forces are far away, by the way, not in the east, as if someone could think these forces, first of all in europe in the middle east, of course, there are asia but these forces are serious now. they just throw some stuff in there. well, the further

the closer the likelihood of a direct military clash between russia and the united states, at least in some minimalist forms, the more aggressive these people will be, and in this sense, of course, we really need to think about how we are, and in this difficult environment, but to conduct an offensive information policy, because my deepest feeling that we will be heard, if we say important rather simple obvious things, we will be heard we will be heard by the same global south, we will be heard by the new east to dry the new middle east we will be heard that middle east, which is not yet a state, we will be heard by many social movements. let them keep silent when they hear us. well, let them hear in this sense, of course, we have come to the point where hmm, we must supplement our

military-political and political efforts with very serious offensive actions of his government. by the way, i would not call it external political propaganda. it is something deeper, something more. it should be based on real existing interest groups on people, it should be based, a now about serious things and briefly enough, because what to discuss here , i also already remember you a world in which russia is not. yes, moreover, when the president talks about roscossing, russia is not a figure. e speech is borrowed and well, for example, from the military charter the word skew is a term that applies to a military unit that loses his knowledge. and these are very

interesting things. he also says, indeed , the defrauding of russia, from which all the symbols of the state would be taken away. we just forgot how close it was at the beginning of the 2000s when a delegation from the european union came to us and discussed the possibilities of a strategic partnership between the eu and russia. inside this discussion, there was a lot of interesting things even more uninteresting, but there was a question, and visa-free regime, so here is the european union he is right behind her representative the european union directly stated that before that it was possible, and we are even ready to consider the issues of russia's admission to the european union, but there are nuances in parts. the first one was supposed to join the european union well, of course, the kaliningrad region is further, and st. petersburg is the leningrad region and further

everywhere. this is what is called the mechanism. slash. devise a mechanism for creating non-sovereign zones on the territory of the sovereign side and i’ll tell you, but you listened you seriously listened, you listened to these people who came with the idea of ​​skewing official negotiations russia seriously. well, now let's see if russia is preserved as a sovereign state. well, this is it. there is multipolarity. there is a dialogue there is an agreement on arms control strategic not strategic. how will this go? yes, but there is also a certain architecture of international relations in which sovereign states play the main role. and if russia well, firstly, no, to have illusions, very soon there will be no china. in any case, in the form and form in which it exists now and even more so in the form in which it is and in the form it is claims. well, then another system

of international relations. and this is american hegemony. yes, without leadership, but hegemony. well, that's actually the dilemma that leadership or hegemony put in the zhizinskie. it will not be a measure of american leadership. it will be the world of american hegemony, which will mean to control not sovereign states, but territories, well, spaces around which anxious people with machine guns will run, including through a puddle received, so to speak, on the territory of the former wes ussr yes, and engage in what is called a trophy economy. that, in fact, is the whole choice that we were offered here, and then the winding up of the dates of the lice already begins, but still, i ’ll tell you one thing, shlyushechka. that a change is taking place in europe since before they all

said, as if learned by heart, that ukraine must win, now they say that russia must lose, that is, roughly speaking, the mechanism of destruction and rakeirovaniya russia, it has changed, if earlier it was done through and, as it were, planned to be done through a military victory, now it will be planned through a military defeat of russia, which is unattainable only on the battlefield, which is the result. such a combined effort from not inside is another question, what, of course, this is the last analysis of nonentities, right? and this, of course, is not at all what a combined effect can create. well , actually, and all that i am ready to say is strong. so they say, yes, what are we going liberate crimea, as they say, and the americans. yes, no, well, we do not mind, of course,

what is needed, right? they create assault brigades there, assault brigades, well, 30 thousand corps are handed over and pumped up 60. and we somehow answer this. but not me. why do we even say we say no? there is no crimea, we are crimea why , for example, our goals, such as the return of primordially russian lands, are not formulated? all and to return all the primordially russian lands and explain what kind of land the city is and to solve this problem say that the recruitment of volunteers how many 200.000 are needed 300.000. how many tanks do you need 3.000 5, 10, how much industry will happen and our task is that we don’t give a damn about what they want for themselves and in what ear they are picking, for example, a simple russian city. of the great russian army

of the 18th century, which the germans have not yet united with it. well , uzhgorod yuryev should definitely be taken. no, well, it's just that. well, the city of yuryev must be taken, ivangorod and a lot. what else is not well, that is, if we start talking seriously, if we understand, what are the stakes, then let it shake, you bastard. and there will be another transition through you have to see the alps, how the monument to suvorov is there. and see if they remember in milan how they kissed the hands of russian soldiers? if you really want to be rude, you bastards know russian, he

slowly harnesses, and then quickly rides until we are mysteriously silent, while we are mysteriously silent. this, it seems to me, is not a very advantageous position, but nevertheless. let's if we talk about the struggle of meanings, narrative and so on, the main native or meaning, which i think, has lost in these 30 years. although we have talked about this here more than once. this is what the loot supposedly conquers evil. look at foreign policy in relations with europe, we counted on the fact that mutual economic interest will provide an understanding of security stability failed in the post-soviet space, we counted on the fact that the enterprise of our oligarchs. so to speak the chain of operations to ensure the loyalty of the elite, and many other things have failed in domestic politics. we counted on what, so to speak, all sorts of different flirtations providing all sorts of bonuses, there are all sorts of radio stations and all sorts of buying with people who are either openly oppositional or let's say there. uh, for the money, the patriots also failed. yes, this is all obvious. that is, they are absolutely right. that's what politics is.

uh, it means that the solution of everything with economic exclusively economic levers, has lost a complete one hundred percent fiasco and ukraine in this sense , the most striking confirmation of which we have not talked about, but nevertheless, money can be a very effective tool when it is based on ideas b on strategy, so to speak, for some meaning other than money. especially in russia, that's why , uh, this is the most important conclusion. i think that should be done. it seems to me that he has already made the question only that, of course, this should have been done earlier, because under him. uh, just uh, i know that, it’s already with a pun that a huge number of meanings have been dissipated, on which our sovereign idea , so to speak, it was based there , many, many have become these, i have skewed them into simple ideas, supposedly. money is everything questions of money, of course, comrade no one canceled. i say dima seven-colors so to speak, yes, but nevertheless, no matter how the world rests on them. although they are undoubtedly they are extremely important first, second. that's what, uh, president putin said that, so to speak, the russian people can disappear and so on and so forth. i think this is undoubtedly the importance of thought. but uh, here too uh. you have to say b and c and so on and so forth. let's be honest, that one more problem at the bottom

of one of the problems of these 30 years was such a total desire of ours, at least least part of our faces in general to deprive the russian people of their identity within russia russians. well, what kind of russians are there, so to speak, either they exist, or they don’t exist, as it were, yes. well, there were, when there, maybe there was never at the same time a delivery to the growth of national self-consciousness, which , of course, was beneficial, relatively speaking, yeltsin to his team, uh, during the collapse of the soviet union , simply because a technological bet was made on this and then here is the development this topic is russian. well, it's funny russian. this is a bad russian, how to glue it together muzzle, and in some kind of smirk, grin, and so on and so on, we are expected from these people. eh, the perception and the name are here, but at the same time it is, so to speak, meaning in the russian world. to be honest, i wonder how these indigenous, as it were, archetypes, generally remained alive, and that's for me personally. this is a pleasant surprise that somewhere in the depths of the people's soul, as it turns out, in general. uh, everything still exists despite years of trying. it's completely destroy, right? i think that in order to move on, uh, it's still necessary. well

you know, it’s not great russian chauvinism that is returned to the russian people. yes, what do they say? by the way, i’m not sure that i have ever been to put it mildly, but, nevertheless, the understanding that russia is the only form of the historical realization of the russian ethnos on planet earth and he is responsible for this. including mutual responsibility yes, the homeland and the people of the people and the homeland, moreover, in my opinion. uh, when usually start to annoy. but what about a multinational professional country before. you are harming others in this way. similar. if you get the jews out of here, let's imagine you, what was the name of alexander getsenko save only the soviet people fish others. evgeny tkachuk is not here, i'm sure i'll be with you until the end of my life fedor