with nato it is a big hard war. and the sooner we realize this, the better this war will be, in which the majority of humanity sympathizes with us. what in particular did the twenty at the level of foreign minister show china india the global south latin america south america they sympathize with us so should we continue to be active as diplomatic? so it is within the country. it is necessary to understand the strategic defeat of russia in nature in russian , that we want to finally solve the russian question. our history fell historical

mission again. in europe, there are a lot of things for americans. and there was a case in the war, we had two others lying down were transported, sitting, they were just discussing that, according to several conventions, medical machines should not be touched. the first car with scouts arrived. nobody got out lying there. it's just a pity, like this flash of color, you know that if it weren't for this girl, i might

not be sitting here with you. today we are signing agreements on the admission of the donetsk people's republic to russia lugansk people's republic and that's it. what began with the signing of an association agreement by ukraine. this is a country with which we have developed special relations over the centuries, but we should have thought about it, no, ukraine as for the historical new russia, they never perceived us as our own. we perfectly understood that troops could also be thrown against us. well, we didn’t even think that it would be aviation, so the people of donbass became a stranger in ukraine , they trusted that russia, we are here

, we don’t leave anywhere, we keep our crow cause is right, victory will be ours. dmitry well, this topic was probably discussed, yes, in full. the only thing is right? i

agree with what colleagues have said before . there are two factors, the one that is on the ground and dwelled on it in detail, and the one that refers to the so-called information-psychological warfare, any terrorist attack always pursues. eh, such a goal that the impact of information and psychological should be much greater than the very fact of a terrorist attack. if you fail to make it possible to read, then the terrorist attack failed. that's here, of course, from the point of view of a large informational psychological impact. i don’t think that they have something strategic or successful from above in this part. although the basis for informational psychological action. in fact , the reason they created more of the world managed to admit it. now here's the thing. with whom and how to pay. i think that this needs to be very clearly understood, i am

convinced of this in my personal opinion. that's what all this is planned, uh, at the operational-technical level, uh, the main the direction of intelligence mr. budanov. so, uh, the british were supporting and supervising this. after all, they are very curious. i don’t know, well, volodya will say more, probably, she fed. he showed it to me today in the program. uh, uh, the day before this action came out in britain, uh, times, a big article, and here it is in the very formation of eroa, as the mark said by the professor. yes, ro- 2.0. uh, well, that is, who does not understand roy - this is the vlasov army? yes, here is the vaz army, two zeros, and they inflated it there especially for in order to show that this is, well, a big powerful unit, seriously. there, and so on and so forth, and a day later she was involved. that's why at least all

this happened with british supervision and support. here, uh, but what the gur does. they understand, but again, in the logic of this very informational psychological war. after all, it is very simple, they need to do something all the time so that in the difficult conditions that they have, starting from bakhmat, and in other parameters, keep and try all the time raise the degree of the moral and psychological state of your sun, and all the time you need to work hard. these are e-dopings. e in this case. and here we have to decide on the one hand. needless to say, it's not us. these are some partizans themselves, russians there, but on the other hand, one must say with one’s society that some, of course, we are, and here they let it out, because everyone who spoke from ukraine said in this modelling. well we pretend it's a partisan. well , actually, you know, you are all here in ukraine and

you in the west know that we are therefore fully responsible for, with all the ensuing consequences, for terrorist activities for a terrorist act. here is the ukrainian service - from my point of view, this is a fact that does not need additional justification. now , of course, the last thing is probably about the information war, because for them this is a very important factor in the war, in general, they cannot live without it. this is the part that needs to be exploited and even exploited from above. here and here you need understand for our country. you know, sometime. i think that textbooks will even contain elementary military training in schools in 10 years , not so long in 10 years . the first point is to write down such an instruction, well, the fundamental thing for this very information war, which

we all like to argue very strongly, then, really, it doesn’t follow. quite the opposite. hmm, the informational psychological impact that the party turns out to struggle has its only two goals of the third can not. to lower the moral and psychological state of your opponent and to increase the moral and psychological state of your own is further nuances. but these are the fundamental principles of everything that happens here. that's when we forget that all of this is stretched out on this fundamental principle. here, it turns out that often seeing the information war. we have the opposite situation: we lower our marxos, we raise with the enemy. here i am dima. well, the term dim well i'm sorry, i'm so this is the most moral psychological state.

yes, holy brevity. so i would like us to talk about this, in principle, which, uh, well, i consider important and fundamental for all reasoning about this area. here, so that we, as it were, do not retreat very much now. so to speak, geopolitics are big questions well, i heard y shackle, by the way it's very interesting. we discussed it, that they pulled her out yes, because of conditional naphthalene, and now she is almost the main ideologist, yes, here she is ideologically given stanford dean stanford to give, well, you just you confirm. yes, i don’t know the details, i’m rather here, as it were, for sensations. yes, as i see , they sing without details. uh, almost the main idiologist, and she made an ideological end of january with this article today. she made the second thing i heard there, and we must be ready for a war on two fronts.

no, comrades americans and comrades nato and all the tribes subordinate to us. you don't have to be afraid of the exit. we don't have another. here are some who argue that we should leave ukraine to deal with china strategic categorically ideologically wrong. this is what i'm telling you. that's how i understood the speech. uh, condoleezza rice by the way, the rest of the line is lined up for this speech. i still don’t fully understand what drives such people to confrontation. she named the fourteenth forty. the first - 2001. yes, after each of these children, american troops did not immediately enter into hostilities. well, yes, immediately in 2001, not in 2001, we entered 2002. well , that is also not. well, it was just so much, and you remember everything. airborne landing this

late autumn, in my opinion, yes, yes, the infantry of the triple alliance, but for me it is important . this and this sounded there. this is what zelensky said, american soldiers will die for ukraine, i don’t know him. i don’t know, so far, i understand that they are counting on a phased approach, as we have discussed many times the use of all resources. uh, well, our satellites first, and then we are our own here on the territory of uh on the territory of uh, the former ukrainian soviet socialist republic here. i think so, i can make mistakes. nobody showed me the plans, right? oh, they count on it. but i think that it is very important what was said today after the conversation between sergei viktorovich lavrov and the chinese new foreign minister,

when the chinese foreign minister said that comrade wang had very important talks in moscow. there were discussed such fundamental things that will have an impact on everything. eh, next. uh, developing our relationship. that's it, uh . things are unfolding, but i think that for china it should be clear after the sanctions against their companies and the constantly pouring threats of the minister's reasoning. e ambassador of america in china that went to america in china says we drove the leaders. now, if you admit it, it will be a conversation, but you don’t admit it. let's talk differently. the position of the united states is stronger than it was five or 10 years ago, this strength of our alliances, this is the strength

of our private sector, this is our innovation capacity and our scientific research potential, which is coming down from our research institutes and our major technology companies. i really do. i think the chinese now understand that the united states is staying in this region. we are the leader in this region in many ways, and we want a peaceful future with china, we don't want as president biden, makes it clear. every time we talk about it, we don't want conflict, but we're going to stand here on our feelings of optimism. since the president of the fighters said how we stand in ukraine and will stand in ukraine, yes, such people say here, we we are going to stand as leaders, uh in asia. and you comrades, get out of here. get out of here. we are standing here. it is interesting, by the way, did not stand about it. it is interesting that they have created a commission for activities there, the chinese communist party will be investigated here, and the second interesting third interesting

coincidence. today, by the way, they raised the issue of disclosing all their investigations and all materials on the emergence of the coronavirus. something tells me that this is purely, by chance, right now there was a congress in odessa-don for voting it is this point that chinese assets will be seized to compensate residents in america for claims that will not be filed due to losses related to carnegie by the head of the fbi three days ago proper. what is it? okay, wait . what's going on here? well, you just need to understand if the pictures, if someone does not understand, i work with understanding, and not with something else. uh, 3 days ago, the head of the fbi said, here i am, uh, so, uh. no, it's a pancake, he said, the wording is interesting there. so the virus is a bitch from a lab controlled by chinese

the government as a result of this killed millions of american citizens, see, directly the chinese government. the blame for the murder of millions of american citizens has already been formulated. everything has already been formulated. that's why this is the same person who said that the virus has a natural origin. and anyone who says the opposite is a conspiracy theorist. remember, our old jokes from youth have changed the concept. yes, now it was artificial. naturally. the concept has changed, now artificially. well final these plans are all very. well, i received it today. well, additional confirmation that we understand these plans, considering we work with them. here, by the way, direct confirmation is extraordinary loud and such an unequivocal i think, there many began to scratch their heads. although these are ukrainian, they are

american gestures, but still a gesture of thoughtfulness. i mean the article that our deputy commander of the strategic missile forces published in a military magazine is very interesting material. that's because he's right describes already so convincingly the scenario of a nuclear war, which the states are hatching, because they have nowhere to go and hold on in another way, they cannot. and such a cultural brief explanation, as it were, of what we are going to oppose there as well. here , the most important thing is such an interesting wording that at any stage of this plan, that is , the destruction of our destruction of our strategic forces, and then inflicting a devastating blow on the american plan. we have our own plan that will warn. this action at every stage

it was unrolled. that is, even before they try to use it. here, to whom it is interesting, i advise you to read good, by the way, good questions. no, i've read. well, yes, but i just have a question. but americans are not stupid either. i never said what they do. they struck at the base of our strategists and with the hands of ukrainians. how did we answer no way to answer someone? but this is essentially. this is what they did then and it is clear that they are trying to do it. even when there is an attempt to strike our plane through there. doomsday. well there. ukrainians also live in the american, and we are not to blame at all. yes , to define very clearly what is happening in relation to our strategic forces. we hold the blame

not only for the coronazis. well, as the american hosts with all the ensuing consequences. i think the moment is transition. it is simply a moment of transition to another state. yes, and here it must be done very accurately. i have no doubts that this transition will be made in no way. e history, so to speak, of verdun and the first world war with the millions who the dead that are being buried around we are not going to commit. they are in vain for this who knows how it will go. well, you know it never will. i speak. yes, i say i'm not going to. i try to always be. you know. yes i try to be exactly the expression. nobody knows the future, of course. i'm just waiting for when that's bye that's how much. years vladimirovich putin always clearly follows his public policy. that's what he said and will be

done. here, when february 24 began , he said earlier, and if someone sticks his head in, then we will answer like this. here, i'm just waiting for us just at the moment, because you 're talking, first of all, they're so publicly very about going out. it would seem that, anyway , no one observes it. yes, it's not being implemented. all checks are nothing. here they are very rotten in public. well, god bless him publicly, comrade blinkin today broke through to the lavra in order to say that let's go, as he himself said. let's just like under the ussr well, like we were threshing, everything is threshing there, as it was threshing, but nuclear potentials. and you can raise an uprising in mexico then, wait a minute. well, this is already a proposal. i am an offer. i i'm in analysis mode behind it. and the fact that the links said exactly this and published it for me shows that they understand this, too, understand this boundary

phase and will try to avoid it. and we must. i think my opinion is that there is nothing to try to impose it with, sergey liked it. he was waiting to understand that we are not interested in this food deal either, right? now these are the correct tonality, right , in general, the harder the better, what i like, blinkin told everyone for so long that he said to lavrov, but for some reason did not bring lavrov's answer and the phrase is not translated into english, but at least the first part of two words. yes, which of the two words they are not broken, they are inseparable in history and in art, please, we are in a period of transformation. we see this process started. it does not stop at the global level of the twenty, which tried to make some kind of summary in the kommunitka. as a result , everyone did not agree that this is a forum that does not really affect any processes, and institutional bodies such as npp a on

five countries and those that join them, which really over the state bodies influence different industries. uh, the economy of people's lives. this is the sco briks as new platforms that draw in on equal terms new communication, our army is changing at the front. who has seen this process of change, but the military-industrial complex has been reworked quite a lot and is starting to work out, but the situation that happened on the border is just the occasion, probably, to look at the best soviet experience, we talked about it, raise it, er concept. uh, means border troops. let me remind you, we have a service now. it was twice the number. it was our own aviation. these are completely different means of weapons that were now, because for such a long border, for the practically military opposition of those border detachments that i am now, this is not enough, we will be frank, but it is necessary to strengthen those forces and means that are betrayed, of course, this

allows us to change this issue, but we need to move on to technical means, drones. we are moving into a period transformations when we go to robot war. it's already visible as the drones are starting to throw out little drones. this process has been started. it's already coming in now. well, with vodka from the fronts, how do we strike drones that have already placed anti-missile anti-tank missile systems on them, how do they work successfully, being 24 hours. in the air, targets are being sought out; this all allows us to move. further, but the americans do not want these changes. they're here to say that we have a concept, uh, based on rules that just now they announced one of the rules that it’s impossible for the strong, which means that it means to act in relation to neighboring countries, although they themselves attracted it completely, but they just have such neighbors that it makes no sense not on neighboring they think that yes, i want to dwell separately on this concept

of being connected with nuclear weapons, because we have now also broken the paradigm and exit from e, dsmv is actually an indicator that we and the americans will change some kind of parity or something else something. we want global nuclear security. it was all-encompassing, for the french to get in there, so for the british, who have their own nuclear potential, which they always use, to get into the anti-missile defense system that the americans are deploying. around russia in general, they have long been eyeing. how to deliver a global fast strike completely disarmed, but no concept changed the beginning. it was a blow by non-nuclear means that everything went out. if anything, we finish it with a nuclear one. now look like this works. we have to do something about it. by the way , they are used to the fact that during their military conflicts they always had a conflict of low intensity. this is afghanistan, when they flew in, bombed their base, they put no answer. then, according to the degree

of growth, they have a regional conflict and high intensity, high intensity - this is russia, and now, they are thinking here how to interact with us, working out new forces, weapons that already combine these things. by the way, uh, another uh was going on at the same time, a concept related to uh military technology. in space, let me remind you, the americans launched, yes, from such an aircraft, which it was in space for 2 years, the boeing x seven, which, among other things , can carry nuclear weapons, can be located above any point to plan and strike. that is, this placement is already a weapon in space, and not moving. in this direction the whole world is trying, but this situation. well, how the whole world is not western, because the western world is already completely worth the us runs, performing the tasks that they were told, regardless of whether the population wants to talk about it , like it or not. uh, a few more words. i wanted to say that our society. here, this is especially acutely known when you were at

the front. you came and saw how people have changed there, how they perceive it. as you get here with colleagues, i agree when people are in cafes or somewhere in restaurants. they don't fully understand it. and so i just saw myself talking. and why do carpenters fly here, as if here, and what about a sabotage group can come in? i say you understand that us a nato conflict, what is all the technology there, what are the drones, what is intelligence? that there at the border points they shoot with long-range sniper rifles. this is a different story. what do we need to strengthen the border detachment with powerful means of destruction with very long range, by the way, i liked the concept, from which we can maybe take from israel there are two things. first, not a single criminal who caused damage, which means that the citizens of israel anywhere in the world, they destroy it, regardless of any laws and live or it is very much appreciated and the second. this understands that they are constantly in a state of terrorist threat, that at any moment an armed person may appear who will shoot at children and seize schools. they came up with the concept of

the maximum concentration of armed people at any point. in the cafe, all servicemen with weapons. always always everyone understands that someone is anywhere. there will always be an armed one who will always be able to repel. and this concept works. here, maybe we should think, not only territorial some. uh, that means self-defense units that will be on the ground. maybe in some part to legalize, and civilian circulation of weapons. maybe an officer will allow you to wear it permanently or something. still, the state, well, of the conflict that is going on and how the british are pushing ukraine to constant terrorist attacks. by the way, they are not shy. they write more terror on the mi6 website. no, they call uh, the theory of controlled terror drones in bryansk which were they were with british explosives, they direct the americans give satellite images of all the technology the british are pushing rocking this situation, so m-m changes in our society. transition. maybe some new forms

will allow us to break down faster now. here are the ongoing processes.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

but it's best to check. in order to compare us with israel , several factors are needed, firstly, it is necessary that for many decades the state exists in a constant sense of terrorist military threats it is necessary that this state be formed due to the constant influx of migrants, each of whom understands where he came from, it is necessary to carry

out total military service, which will also apply to women, including whether we are ready for this, which concerns the free circulation of weapons, in my deep conviction. on hand, the less the threat that this weapon entails, but on which i agree with you. this is, of course, a feeling of coolness, a feeling of calmness, a feeling that all this is not happening to us. and somewhere far away. here is the terrible one that unfortunately, today it does not exist in this sense either, and this somehow reminds me of the feeling of our more than twenty years of recentness. it even turns out already soon thirty-year-old i mean, events. the first is now as a company.