[000:00:00;00] we open russian channels and all

series of films and cartoons educational programs and documentaries for free without registration yes, they ask, they have reconciled these countries, and now, when we were talking with the guys, even the west demanded and introduced, by the way, a trial of these commanders who fought there, they say, we won’t give anyone, everyone works and the country lives. i mean, cappuccino cambodia laos vietnam china is still ruled by the communist parties, i want to say one more thing in this regard today not today in russia, here we are talking and showing how we are now trying to establish quickly. ah, our ties with those countries that us. well, how shall we say. well, now we will hold a parliament with you russia africa. here alexander mikhailovich read

the head of the organizing committee. about forty countries have already signed up there, lavrov traveled there. i want to apply a different asymmetry here. here is the same one as i conducted in my first speech in asia, for some reason, we, turning to them, say. let's help poor countries. let's also have a corridor that we arranged for the grain, because we need to help the poor, they are rich. although, there europe will fry everything, guys. come to draw a parallel. and who supported us? these are the times, stalin , the time of the war before the war, who supported us , he supported the idea, it’s true, yes, the country’s comments are the communist movements of the left movement, and i want to draw this parallel today. and for what they supported not because the rose and yulia and rosenberg sent them grain there, for example, but for the idea for idea, and i was amazed when i found out this rosa er rosenberg yes, she wasn’t, she

wasn’t. eh, spi- scout of our julius. yes, he was a member of the komsomol, first he collected a contribution and then, so also information. well, not the most important thing, by the way, information. there were a lot of scouts in this one, which i am not distracted by. i'll pass on the idea you are now saying, we will supply gas. we will deliver, or rather, the lord argued, remember that they shot fertilizer. let's go to africa let's go to africa this is not enough, of course, it was not enough that we will just help them today there should be an idea and which in soviet times impoverished us with them at the level of the communist idea of ​​internationalism , now the ideas and protection from e-e are completely african received from them. here, just

watch. i'm here now let's show. 20 1994, this is forgive me, not the wine of france, i will say it harshly, you could not restore sovereignty in our country, not a military one, neither in the field of security, nor in the state, this is a reality, one should not look for someone to blame on the side, and therefore we are in a situation that has led to a terrible disaster, millions died in the second war and we must not forget the need to bear responsibility, but it cannot be attributed to the french. true justice needs to be established, transitional justice, which is the key to bringing those who killed to justice. but they still sometimes hold positions of responsibility here, no, like you, you can count on lasting peace and trust until justice has been done, so there is nothing to blame france for what depends on you is a reality. you have to be completely headless during a tour of african countries , to yell at the president of the congo felix chistocheri, when the latter reminded the macron of his country's involvement in the genocide of the ninety-fourth year, da

saved asked how france was going to help restore the security of the congo then the macron. here she began to swear in front of a journalist. well, the only thing is that they lost africa forever, that is, therefore, the macrons supply everything they can to ukraine, because in africa they got kicked in the ass. so it flies over there somewhere in the distance the macron comes out on near-earth orbit yes, uh, like in this regard, i want to, and i emphasize this idea, except for mutual economic assistance. we need to ideologically pursue this idea, which means that we are defending values ​​that are alien to us. they feel you then you will make the correct ball. then. come on, at least we do business in our country. well, this one too. you always support me. i always support that let's. so appointed russian lawyer, one of the most important positions in the country, who says, well, in general, to think of it until now we have a constitution forbidden ideology, of course, well, when we discussed the referendum calmly and we will be

relatively calm times. we were communists then saying, well, let 's refuse, they told us, but it's impossible. she sealed the article. that one is everything, the first second part is everything, perhaps the tablets, or what? this is the tablets to seal, on this the text is not needlessly collected constitutionally unsealed now to do, but in conclusion i would like to say that about one thing in connection. damn , they know stalin's experience they need now study stalin. uh, hmm, economists alexander mikhailovich they are, of course, leninists, speaking to nobody, speaking economically. now. here, why do the left us now still support? basically though there are those who say that realism war impe? and what about plums? believe me, it’s not even a war, the empire, as karen says, but a war of imperialists, supposedly there is no market there, look even worse, which we are ideologically, how we differ from the americans, when it comes to the socio-economic formation, of course

they talk, they talk all the time, there is no cold war. and why do you have everything the same as you don’t, but the values ​​​​a-a that we don’t want our sovereignty to be robbed. and the last thing i tell you all the time when i argued here, not only with you on dvsm. yes, under the strategic encirclement agreement. not only i asked this question personally to the president. not only when here i was, we went yes, i say, they say, well, it's profitable for us. i'm talking all the time now, but can't we withdraw from the world trade organization? we are robbed of nothing do not miss. no fertilizer, without saying, take nothing. at the same time, we continue to comply with all standards. you know the wto, i'm going the day before yesterday, listening to vesti fm flower growers , our greenhouses, they say we can't work. well, what is it? according to the wto rules, you send here flowers from latin america , which are much cheaper than ours, we still

buy dutch ones. what the hell are they setting you up here, but let's go to hell to kill the russian class. we are your fuckers. they say they don't fucking scream and there are a thousand florists to the car the builders they say, well, let's go out and suspend at least in relation to not friendly. how do you understand correctly? after all, stalin did a great thing. many appreciate it and say capital. before , it really leaked. it flows from the outskirts, flows into the center. someone buys some paintings there, someone brings them here. there, like the ryabishinsky or there. uh, this is the same, it means stalin and uh, after the revolution, the capital was taken away and nationalized. and not on purpose. they even ran away and abandoned themselves. and people to work it is necessary somewhere and the capital began to work for the country for the country and stopped running,

because in the eighties and seventies, when we again had oil and gas, they began to give them and they stopped building factories. so to withdraw from the wto. this is our task. i will repeat it all the time on your program, the very next time. i think, well, that's why the paths were to start your story after all, and i want to say that what our soldiers say is that there is a difficult situation in the territory, being in, not an easy situation. and speaking of my confidence. they still, probably, post-poodly mean, the next thing is why not only because they are russian, because they defend russian values, and that's it. the rest that could be told quite widely, they still involuntarily say that there is no truth on the other side, therefore, they don’t save their own up to two hundred, they have 300 moreover, we understand that the number of mercenaries and the presence of nato already means physical, what for them, uh, ukrainians. this is a consumable material for them, all the more so there are no so-called "friends

" or "strangers" for them, these are consumables and in in your story, one more thought sounded that we are confronted by a serious machine, and we talked about this here, and moreover, it is gaining momentum today, and we must say once again that there is no need to relax. this is a huge potential against us and they will do everything for you to inflict maximum damage on us in all directions, therefore, speaking of the fact that, of course, the problems of solution lie within our country. let's move on to our situation. today, we have to go through certain provisions very rigorously. well it is obvious to us today that the yes economy should develop based on an understanding of macroeconomic planning; moreover , everyone is already talking about it and it was impossible to dream about it a year ago, but we must once again clearly state three things. well, firstly, it should be two-profile planning, that is, directive for the gas sector and government orders, and indicative for the market segment. and it is not necessary, i repeat , to oppose moreover, we do not have

time. the time factor in the implementation of this decision plays a key role, and finally. we should create a state structure under the government of the state commission. yes , whatever the government is going to decide, but it must create a special body. it is an analogue of the rut. today there are already such studies in the government. they have worked a huge amount with the help of anti-tech solutions that just today the facts of the lord are working. in fact , moreover, the digital state plan itself is planned to be launched already in the twenty- third year. so make under it to the structure. i'm not this is not my competence, but on my opinion. this is what we need. why do we need to do this, because anyway we still live in nu in those concepts that are not characteristic of this period. here recently. i read that the ministry of culture. uh, but forbade, uh, the companies to show films related to the fact that there is no license there, well, and so on. well, it's them where do they live in what in what? in what world they are present, but if a war is waving against us, she will forget, what are the reviews? what

rights, if it is necessary for the people to show what the people need, if we do not need show, then licenses should not be a criterion here shown on the screens of quite films. but when we are talking about the economy, the government also demonstrated over the past year the colossal possibilities of using tools, what did they do? we talked about where we are in the world and so on, but the main thing is not this, what is after today, especially after the speech. what president mishustin said, everything goes into the economy, there are about a trillion rubles in those industries that are associated with high technology with high degree, processing, and so on, it was said, but we found a mechanism for concessional financing. i'll briefly say 30% of the discount rate. this is somewhere around 2.5% plus 3%, that is, enterprises will be issued a loan at 5.5%. and, in fact , there will be 10 to a private bank, just that part will be subsidized by the state. look, we should finally ask treasury for the glory. god she will now be

distinct. i didn't understand. why this action? why is this action and transfer in order, if with a trillion 5% is 50 billion in banking i respect the sector, but what kind of banking sector will develop the real economy when it just gets guaranteed 50 billion rubles. well, this is it, well, this is at least, well, i should seriously ask myself i don’t understand another. does the state need it? well, today the relationship between the ministry of finance of the central bank and the government as a whole exists and there are no difficulties in vain, if these are very complicated words. i do not have enough in a different way, but if the state says, i need to say relatively. 20.000 tanks every month. why should i lend for water? i'd better give him an advance, while there are no reasonable ones, how can i lend better in advance did not turn the tide.

this is wrong, moreover, for the decision it lies on the surface, there is the industrial development fund. yes, you will fill it with capitalize on this amount and you will give it to those enterprises that need it daily. why use something so complicated? and why do they use it, because today there is a limitation due to the fact that we also have the central bank and its partner, the ministry of finance here's what i'll tell you today is planned. well, not planned. we have to admit that we have a budget. deciding again. it's not that it's not scary. this is not a catastrophe, given that our internal public debt is less than that of any other state. it is generally absurd to be afraid of something or to discuss it, but still, the solution to this problem is again brought out only on one way. and uh, offices, that is, federal loan bonds, they are issued at 10% per annum, banks buy them again. well listen. well, is it possible for the state to directly solve this problem, but if we have a budget deficit, but finance directly. and why can't this

be done, because there is a ban on the law on the central bank and well, and in the constitution related to the central bank to directly finance the state. and here we come to very interesting positions. maybe it's time for us to think about the fact that the ban, from where it was fixed when it was formed, was not written in the constitution, as i understand it. well, who pierced it into the constitution. that is the question. we question when they tell me moses came down to him for him equipped, everything no questions. i understand, well, when she completely cuts me off, they tell me it's in the constitution. i have a question. and how it got into the constitution is the main question. and who can fix you back? well, of course, because, well, in chica it’s interesting and how. i got caught in the constitution. i think that right on the eve of it, it’s more wrong than right, moreover , we don’t even need to change the constitution, because there are examples of gerashchenko and so on, when the will existed and well, it was possible to earn extra money in the house to correct the law about the central bank. nothing catastrophic

is needed. well, just a decision and finally admit that it needs to be done, because according to the constitution we have the central bank as an independent body. well, it’s fine in other times, he was independent, but who is crying, but anyone in our audience, you understand, the salary of independence is somehow settled, yes, it turns out that the state pays the salary, and he is the state central bank independent body, in addition, he has colossal opportunities to saturate the economy and restrictive measures in relation to the government, but the function of it and the adequate function of the government. so i want to tell you what, in fact, if you go a little further. yes, then we do not forget that the central bank is part of the international monetary fund. well, that is, it is their relationship, but their relationship is determined by contractual relationships. and here are the contracts. today, for example, i have a direct question. but after all, we , using the example of the military segment, decided

to suspend our participation in a very inconvenient for conversation. here is my question. and what was done during the year, based on the fact that there is such a set of lists of conditions that define cooperation between the imf and the central bank, what was done by the central bank, and in the analysis of what needs to be suspended what to refuse, and so on because this issue directly rests on the wto and wwii. wto i know different positions there to get out of stay. but for me, for example, for me the situation is comfortable like this , you want to stay, then you will clearly fix it, you can even not publicly what we just we understood that we must be in relation to countries that do not fulfill their obligations, if we need to save face and staff. with other countries friendly or close to this concept, please work on. for this, there is no need to take drastic steps , but with the imf it is more difficult. why? because the mf is a structure that, in fact, stands in the way of our de-dalarization. we should not abandon the dollar, only

calculations, where tolorization should occur not only in the heads, but also in another in others. segments. why because the dollar lives by the rules set by the western financial world and the imf is the pinnacle of that there are many institutions. and if we want to carry out de-dalorization, we must destroy or get away from these rules and create our own imf , which china did the nearest in, literally days, it announced that the financial sector is coming under direct subordination to the party and state, they created a special government commission, which today understand the importance of this segment. i speak i guarantee that in the near future it will be announced that china is coming out of the creation of v-2. this is good. we can cooperate with them here. moreover, we and our other allies will provide the necessary content for any currency that is accepted. here at this general meeting, but we need to write our own rules and get away from the imf in this segment, and here we don’t have to argue to leave

, don’t leave, of course, but we don’t need to declare. this can be done differently. china has never fully complied with the recommendations that it is in, it simply does not advertised. it was the parallel financial system that developed the economy. and today he went on the attack, and he said that yes, everything becomes a commission, and in this way they destroy their relationship with the imf, we need to do the same and ask our central bank and preferably in mythina. how were they analyzed and what conclusions were drawn from the past tense regarding how we should build relationships that still remain, so today when we talk about the need for a new new economic ideology, it much of us is connected with the fact that we not only understand how to work within the country. well, i didn’t understand the use all tools only one thing. and who would check them, who would they report to? well, in general, according to the anti-dum procedure on the twentieth of april. i preface these questions checks, who does not ask questions, but

who checks them? who is the imf? country, and here they are withdrawing capital again. that's why you need to understand one simple thing as soon as you call the dollar. so, he is no longer with us, he is a record. and here, in these interests, the imf is needed, after all, why do they force the imf to be fucked up, but now oil and gas to increase everything compared to the world and deprived us of a competitive advantage. and you correctly said that china was preserved, including the pipes are simple, but the decision is the decision to repair, then the government, which the russian federation has the central bank or at least do. so to decide, the eggs would

and the government should have the same task. production level of the socio-economic level of our citizens to understand, but i do not pretend to anything. well, they did not have time to answer our question about capital flight, the cocktail will not have time to answer this question. they generally live in a wonderful world in the world of pink ponies where no one touches them and you can do whatever you want. i don't know what, actually, we are at war with nato. well when i didn't say no, well, you see, when the government. we're talking about government the government knows exactly the issue is zero. so far, nothing has come together. just in our country, where there is free journalism, where one country viewers can ask a question. we also have absolute freedom not one question does not answer. well, or not in those offices to answer in the market always with a huge one. in general, it is interesting to shine as alexander mikhailovich. the same one owns this very interesting story, but

here's what i think, well, in general, here we are from the ninety-first year and purely russian passion. that is, in the western world we are all destroyed that it was possible to destroy everything, but thank god the defense industry was not completely destroyed. yes , we destroyed the entire system, everything that we had, and for me it was absolute nonsense then. i thought that we are in the best of this whole thing, that we did not work in the ussr. and it turned out that we decided everything, it was just fed. and now , it’s quite difficult for us to turn around 180° once and for all, of course, the task, as i say, of compropriator capitalism, is quite difficult for him to fight with donors. you see, this well, this will have to be done and it will change , and in this sense, i, by the way, understand the president

. it’s quite difficult to deploy such a ship like that right away, but what alexander mikhailovich says seems to me very convincing. now. i think that's what to say, i would like to never forget. it seems to me the essence of the matter, that is, from time to time. he needs to be reminded. it should pop up in our minds, because behind this momentary today's and very important events, sometimes, as it were, the main thing is gone. that's what i was reminded of today, that's the main thing, you know. i have a lot of correspondents, people write letters. there, someone tells their stories in hope, and someone with the fact that just to help me suddenly they use it somewhere in the cinema books send a lot of books send and send their own just who liked them. thank you all very much. i read everything, i don’t answer everything, of course, but i read everything and i try

to read everything. this is very. touching it's great that literally on friday my correspondent sent me such a book of my beloved writer vladimir bogomolov, whom i spoke many times, the author of august forty- four, whom i spoke many times. here it should be inserted into the school curriculum. here you have patriotism and interesting entertaining , as they say, in this sense, this person is a wonderful writer, a figure, a front-line soldier who has passed, as they say, everything that could be passed and uh, of course, uh, and. here is his book. i didn’t read it, it turns out he had a novel called he e he is called a line from a wonderful e, yesenin’s life. you dreamed me. well, actually. it's such graphic unfinished book. well, as in august forty-fourth. it is very much built on documents such as these. here are such

simple ones. in the documents , i don’t know the order for the regiment and the orders for the division there, so to speak, clothing certificates. uh, it's there in the forty -fourth forty-fifth year our prisoners of war are german all through documents through this and through this this autobiographical through his life. as you know, after the forty -fifth year, he was sent to fight in japan, e, participated, and then he served on a all the way to kamchatka and here he is all this and now i'm reading and that's it. this and suddenly i'm cruel, the book must be said to be a very tough book, as they say, and suddenly you understand, that's the extraordinary disaster that our people experienced. well, it's just extraordinary it's something it's been hell. it was a hell of a life. it was . it was death. it was blood. it was it was endless suffering. by the way, my

parents went through all this. well, somehow this generation never talked about it directly, that is, they said that it was hard. it's in this book that it all becomes clear now you'll see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's best to check.

including, isn't that how we are going to give him the title of righteous man of the world. many come to us with weapons in the family, there was one valuable relic, it was taken from me. you said you would return the pipe

in peace. i think you understand, and this is a country that has come out of this war completely, as they say, bloodless, so to speak, the next war. and you see, we must not forget that with our country the west waging war for 100 years. that's just such a war. this is the last one, this is the last centenary, it began with