so i think you understand, and this is a country that has come out of this war completely, as they say, bloodless, so to speak, hungry unfortunate. this broken her declare the next war. and you see, we must not forget that the west has been at war with our country for 100 years. that's just such a war. this last one, this last century, it began with intervention with intervention, which if

there had been no intervention, there would not have been such a scale, by the way, the civil war, that is , in the eighteenth year it began, and it would not did not stop for money. and after the end of the civil war. we know little about this, we have very little information. she was constantly on the borders with poland on the borders with romania. she went everywhere. she went until the forty -first year, then it's a war. here is the terrible one that caused such colossal damage to our country in general then the cold war. and it was going to tell me. well, yes, you know, you yourself are to blame. no, we are not to blame. no, it's not his fault in this case. where we are to blame. i know where we are to blame, but here we are not to blame for what the soviet union undertook. it was always the result of a response, there was no such thing. never the first initiative. it was self-defense ninety-one. well, it would seem. it was our initiative, in my opinion,

we say that it was a betrayal, that it was stupidity, okay, well, the fact remains. we have ended the war. we offered the world to the west and lowered our warsaw park into the world. we seemed to be accusing us of having liberated all, so to speak, eastern territories. we let the republic go without blood, without bloodshed, without any civil wars. without without everything, well completely collapsed. i repeat. can someone tell me, well, fools. maybe i agree with this, but it does not change the essence of the matter. it was still, in my opinion, the great in general, speaking from the point of view, so to speak, of morality and ethics, in general, a step on the part of our people. and what do we get in return, we get nato in ukraine , ukrainians write sympathy to me there, by the way, they write, but i am accused that i am taking a position

against it. and i will say this, ukraine has committed betrayal and this betrayal was visible in the nineties. i was often in ukraine, well, wasn’t it heard that russia is the end of russia will fall apart russia is about to fall apart and it would be necessary to participate in this . it was in the ukrainian community, so to speak, in a general place there, and this is what all this led to. i mean, we must not forget. with all the miscalculations that we have and about which i often speak and will speak, since i believe that it is necessary to talk about those miscalculations that are made and our military political economic leadership. this is what we need, but at the same time, we must not forget the essence of the court, and the essence of the matter is that the west has been waging an ongoing war with us for 100 years. this is the hundred years war. she is nothing different. it seems to me that it

will not go down in history, as at one time the war of france and england entered, so to speak, but intermittently. but this is what it is, and the essence of it is that yes, as the president correctly said, what to rake the country, right? or have i already met there, huh? okay, why do they need it? yes, they will not do. yes, they will not listen, who so, says he does not remember the ninety-first year. i don’t remember what happened after the nineties and i don’t remember how the country was actually already raked and i don’t remember the history of the eighteenth year, when the country was also raked and it didn’t stop them. they weren't stopped. these are not nuclear weapons, nothing, because actually they are not so smart. do you think they are, as they say, gambling, they are impudent. this culture is daring, this culture is talented, this culture is strong, but this culture is absolutely without as they say compromise, when she

sets herself some goals, therefore , this essence should not be forgotten in these in all our conversations. and you have to understand what it really is. as you like to say exostantiality. yes, but we will speak russian. this is a matter of life and death for our country, and it is absolutely so and so it sounds the last thing i will say. about ideology. here is what leonid ivanovich said. by the way, i never wrote off the communist ideology, it is a correct ideology in general. it did not materialize with us, but in general the idea is correct. i agree with her, in general, to create an ideal society, what 's wrong with that, but it's unlikely that it will work for us today. but the fact that i am watching more and more, in general, what was developed, by the way, notice for yourself, that neither is trubetskoy danilevsky,

gumilyov eurasianism by russian thinkers. this is exactly what is beginning to emerge more and more in the world. here's a look at what's happening. look, the world is already clearly divided into east and west and the war is being decided in ukraine the issue of the border between east and west, by the way, i don’t know very characteristically, maybe i have a fantasy , but i immediately remembered alexander nevsky if lukashenka hears this, he will, of course, like it. yes, you see, it's looming, and it's looming, it's inevitable. and in this sense, eurasianism is just a bunch of ideology, which, in my opinion. very even with everything respect needs to be explained. in the sense of well

, because not everyone knows the history of nevsky so deeply to explain. well, you know this famous journey of alexander nevsky this is me in this sense, i just want to say that for me the ordes, because i am eurasia for me, the horde is not a dirty word, the horde was the forerunner, according to millions of the nevsky rotary machine. this is just the eastern turn, which alexander nevsky, by the way, carried out the first in russian history, it was he who carried out and the famous words belong to him. the west takes soul and body, and east takes the body, but in this situation. it seems to me that we can say that this is a different situation. and the fact that this big east is taking shape, in which china will certainly play a very significant role, much like an economic political

center, will certainly play a role. it seems to me that this is already so obvious that it emerges in the modern world. i am alexander grigoryevich in this sense, as always, as always, not unusually. although i think that, of course, he agreed it journey, even brothers had to be sacrificed. well understood well. this idea was before peter. i’ll just explain to ukrainian viewers for a start, because they had an interesting quote from vladimir ilyich lenin that our goal is to destroy the thousand-year history of ukrainians , he uttered this phrase. volodymyr shlemenko , according to ukrainian bloggers somewhere in the depths of 1929. and what was interesting? seriously, this is now a ukrainian site. it cites badly. do you know what year he died? maybe

the world proletariat? well, as the same lenin, the main problems of the proletariat is excessively high confidence, which deserves to be learned to the end, if the communists knew how to listen to the people, they would still be in power, so i would like to start with the fact that he started the program here, uh, this churchill's speech you know, they often ask now. are we in a cold war with the west? no, we don't have a cold war. i lived at that time, i worked abroad in the seventies, well, in years, well, there was no such frenzy, but there was no such russophobia. yes, uh were, so to speak, uh some restrictions on technology, there this uh, yes, there were some sanctions jackson broom. yes, there was no e free travel

abroad. but we carry this on ourselves. uh , they imposed a restriction, then we had exit visas, they were in the west, but we lived quietly, we didn’t communicate, so to speak. there were no calls for this russophobia. so to speak , destroy to win a strategic victory. yes , we were preparing to fight each other, but we were preparing for a calm situation and conducting exercises. now we have a completely open war with the west snaps first of all, the united states, the united states conducts. uh, command-and-staff exercises on maps in germany planning under the leadership of the chairmen of the joint chief of staff committee, planning future operations in ukraine and the ukrainians. ukrainians are present there, listening what they should do with their, so to speak, generals determines the direction of the main attack, where they will go there to melitopol in e, berdyansk or

there, in the north, the ukrainians will write something down, so to speak, the americans and we are planning we still say that we say we are not at war with them. in the very, very real state of war. when they say, i completely agree with you that all this is from the evil one, that they do not have enough. there are shells that they have nothing to shoot with. everything is enough, logistics is established, the americans do not hide it. they have been working on this for a long time. now all the logistics are debugged, everything is going well. i don't understand what we're talking about just what we're waiting for logistics and communications. these are the two basic elements of any e, any war, any offensive defensive operation. here we, uh, recently tested a new one and a half ton planning bomb there, which, uh, is dropped at a distance of 40 km. uh, that is, without entering the military air defense coverage zone

well, well, here it is, well, some of us say that we do not have the means to gouge their transport infrastructure there. well, it's time to do this a long time ago. because otherwise, this is all life, and they really will arm them there to prepare their unfortunate 27 brigades there. although i do not really understand how if they are going to the south to conduct something, as if with air superiority to conduct in the open. they believe that no, there is no front-line aviation. they will be able to neutralize those hummers, which they are supplied in large quantities by vladimir, yes, three corps are now under 100,000 people. they are ready. here's to e compensate. uh, hammerson air superiority needs to be ensured by such a density of these hummers per kilometer of front that this is not about tens or tens. there are no hundreds, but thousands of trunks from a thousand of these uh hypers. well, for the time being

, there are not so many, but nevertheless, they are being prepared. and uh. i repeat again hmm it seems to me that there is no need to wait now about the terrorist act in the bryansk region. the same. you understand, we have 370 km from the bryansk region. we have a completely transparent border. i have been there with us there , these locals walk along these paths, uh , to visit each other. there's a nearby village. there is no border there. well, so to speak, our former partners are current, so say adversaries. they build fences, mine and equip the border. even finland decided to build some kind of five-meter fence there. well, what are we waiting for? we also need ukraine to be a friendly state that will not be near in the foreseeable future. i am absolutely sure of this, therefore, it is necessary to equip it normally. now

move the border correctly. here it is necessary to think already about as a counteraction it is necessary to think. about the fate of the kharkiv sumy chernihiv region, which borders on the russian federation, so to speak, is also necessary after we solve, uh, the main task for the four constituent entities of the russian federation , think something, uh, where to go next, either there to odessa or to clear this flank? we need a checkpoint system. now several blocks have appeared there, you need a complete system of checkpoints, uh, border troops who are fighting there. this is no peace time. these are participants in a special military operation with all the attendant benefits, status, uh, money, and so on. i think it's time already and, uh, one more time. uh, i, uh, i agree with you that as far as possible not to answer, but we did not

answer the northern streams, but even now i had to wait for us to say so, but we answered the crimean bridge. well, they answered right away, but now you need to answer. but to say this is against us. uh, a new, so to speak, terrorist war has already been declared. and this will continue more and more, these others. and, uh, there will be more and more sabotage reconnaissance groups of them, and more and more they will climb into our territory.

some kind of intermediary role is played by something it provides some amenities there, but this grain deal does not bring us anything, absolutely nothing. it is necessary to stop it on march 18, moreover, it is already blocking these ports. and if necessary, then , uh, physically damage, uh, and odessa or whatever the south port enough, i think we need to act. you just need to act harder from these ports. we understand that they are carrying weapons, and from them there is a blow to the crimea. so they are used exactly and i am absolutely sure that through these ports. uh, on the same grain carrier ships. uh i don't believe they're coming completely empty and does not supply anything. hmm , the fact that there is a screening mechanism, i don’t know it for sure, but i think that all ships

are not thoroughly inspected in detail, of course. do not add, do not subtract, it is. so, according to stalin, decide by strong methods, well, after advertising. we watch to explore the world of educational programs documentaries for free without registration. twenty foreign minister, wildly strange information from america, i still did not understand the feeling that not 8 minutes lasted

blinkin’s conversation with lavrov, and all his life at the same time it feels like blinkin was talking all the time in this life, and lavrov did not answer anything creativity studio and all your large audience. and secondly , i would like to say that you do not know the whole picture, and i am ready to tell you now, because many details have developed right now. the fact is that on that very day, when the session of the meeting of the council of ministers of foreign affairs was to be held, and the twenty in the city were in business, and in the morning, right in the morning, about the local dividing time, all of a sudden, the russian media went. uh, got word that there was supposed

to be a meeting. but lavrov and blinkin, and in a surprising way, questions began to come to me. and we were all shocked, because, firstly, there was no meeting in the morning. secondly, it was not planned. and thirdly, as you well remember, blinkin the day before, and through the mouths of all his representatives and, in my opinion, his own, he assured everyone that he would never meet with lavrov in business. well, you remember, yes, therefore, this information, we kind of tried to understand where they told us that this press was the source and showed their materials, including on the internet in social networks, where they came up with a story about the fact that this is the very meeting of the twenty was the meeting place, that is, relatively speaking. they were in the same room, so this can already be considered as a meeting, but then

it turned out that it was just a false star, that, apparently, these same american mainstream media propaganda channels, and the media or the mass media already disinformed, and they were already charged with the fact that this is an action from blinky's side, this should take place. they were just a little earlier, but the start was false. goes meeting blinkin expressed. the request that somehow this contact with lavrov take place, just a few minutes on my feet. well, do you remember, yes, the same concept was blinkin’s that if he sees a laurel somewhere, he will try to grab him, either by the lapels, or by the jacket, or by the sleeve, or by the trouser, but i don’t know what else here it is marie tacking the horns, will try to grab. that's right. this is for these some shares. nut, and

when he tried to grab hold, he tried to tell him something like that, but in principle, but all these little rivers are well known. these are exactly chants slogans, whatever you want, call it now. i think we need to talk the word meme. all this was voiced in a couple of minutes, but then we saw a stunning picture of a complete media bacchanalia in the american media , when the blinks of the state department, then again the blinks began to tell the story, and you can’t say it differently , you know the fact that they almost held negotiations, and some multi-format ones, disarmament ones at that, and so on and so forth. why was all this done? this is such a pr, it's not even an advertisement. this is a originally planned action for in order to somehow build up, and in the course of their election campaign. some well, well,

if you can say the muscles on the international track. well, as you probably noticed, the achievement of zero by the american administration with isolation has once again flown by now. it remains only to spoil what they are doing. well, there must be some positive agenda. here is the element. ah, constructive positive agenda, they tried to model for these. i don’t know there 2 3 4 minutes, but when the blinken caught on some part of lavrov’s clothes on the fields. and the meetings of the g20, but the most amazing thing, they listed ukraine yes, they listed the cis you can imagine what disarmament problems are and what they are, but the situation around ukraine, in order to at least somehow discuss it more or less, seriously, some one and a half to two minutes . well, what was most shocking was what they installed there, and i mean in the description of this one as a meeting, and also a conversation about an american

citizen who was accused of spying on the territory of the russian federation, the court ruled the corresponding sentences, but sometimes the term is a and, a, a blink of colors and paints told about how he stated to lavrov, allegedly his concern for the fate of an american citizen. this is an absolute lie, in general the whole story is fictional, and constructed from it. well, this part is a lie from beginning to end the word was not spoken the word american citizens was not mentioned the prisoners. i do not know the accused, but nothing was said to the unfortunate. and you know why. well, i actually think that it was all done solely for the sake of this story, because when they changed, it’s not half-expelled, but the grinner, who, politely speaking, treats russia very well and treats america very badly and sharply hits the views

of the american voter, who say that you patriots left an american officer in a russian prison, and an african-american lesbian who loves russia here played basketball picked up and pulled out. that is, and so clumsily trying to get out of this situation. well, you understand that if the whole action was invented for the sake of pr, then say the word was. well, you could make him forget the words absolutely. exactly, he forgot. do you know why he forgot? yes, because he doesn't care. not really an american citizen. some kind of intelligence officer with a huge number of citizenship passports in some kind of russian prison is not at all interesting. you understand, not the right figure, not the dividends, which, in principle, you need to think about. that is the question, because it was you who

absolutely precisely formulated part of the election campaign, and they are like a salad crumbled. the most relevant ukraine disarmament is security stability. well, i mean international, but security and a us citizen. but this us citizen, in principle, was dropped from the agenda, because he did not think about him. here they were, sergey , how did you respond to their memes with your famous ones. well, how can you respond to this staged action, but he listened and explained that he had said everything a long time ago and went on about his business, because indeed, on the margins of the twenty, full-scale negotiations took place with those with whom he has now it makes sense to discuss not on the run on the go, but sitting at the negotiating table specific issues related to both the two-watch and

multilateral status agenda of the chinese, the turks, and the brazilians. well, there were also contacts, but i'm talking about the hosts of this meeting, india , of course, took place in a format. a conversation with the head of the foreign ministry, e, india, that's all, but these pr-actions are like this and the price of three pennies has just begun to list important topics, if possible in such a short face format, just the patriot first. will there be an extension what is our position to extend the food deal? and second in the imf and wto. what is our position? let's talk about the food deal at the beginning , you understand the food deal is, if we are talking about an agreement, then we have our part, but we have fulfilled the agreements and are ready to fulfill them, if we are talking about lining our pockets. uh, these are the most western , primarily american companies and their desire to once again cheat their own

benefit. but this is again. e from a series of blinkin's machinations now about the wto and therefore and so on for this deal or if because i i read here is the transcript, because sergey viktorovich said it says there, do not strictly follow. our trinity. all countries will lose by and large, these are deals, if it doesn’t happen, except for us, she didn’t receive anything from her, and i’m talking about this, that if they don’t comply, that is, if this is an agreement that she has. obligations of the parties they are necessarily only one side and goading, e and machinations on the other side, if this is an agreement of equal rights, then we always fulfilled our part we gather in all agreements, if this is another swindle. if yes, another attempt to pull out what they need, and forget everything else, and we saw these examples even in the food deal. well, sorry, then already. let uh, once again they will promise

, once again they will deceive. we cannot be in the category of the simple-hearted. we, that is, for example, we do not renew the deal until they fulfill all these obligations that they have not fulfilled for a year. vladimir you know very well our position, you always see and the result and naturally your magic wand. i don't know, unfortunately or fortunately. no, probably to a greater extent, fortunately, because sometimes the world would stop, in principle, to develop at all. there are tasks and goals that we should achieve . and this is one of them, but a realistic attitude towards who we are dealing with. it seems to me that there is no need to prove now about the imf, the wto, and so on. i hear and we all heard, and to put it mildly, critical assessments of your program, which were expressed by the participants and you regarding the position. i would like to note that the position of russia's participation in international organizations, especially financial financial

orientation. this is not the position of only one department or one person, this is the position of a consolidated state now, otherwise you say it repeatedly and you know perfectly well that the position is being formed, and there are quite a few groups of influence and groups that form this position. here, please, an example for you was the council of europe. you remember very well that the discussion is relative. uh, go out stay again there were many people in our country, politicians, political scientists, public figures, people in power in power, who expressed completely diametrically opposed points of view over several years.