what will support ukraine until the very end, i was scared in place of ukraine? and when he supports the west, is he always predictable? they beat themselves into the head that russia will lose for the sake of this goal, they are ready to wage an

endless war with us. as a result, all western politics comes down to a schizophrenic denial of reality and unwillingness to hear any alternative arguments. in this lamb obstinacy, europeans not only do not feel sorry for their own countries and ukraine, they simply do not really understand the big plan, and it seems to me that this is very important to realize when very stupid person. schultz reports to his master, while smacking partly that the big white man is listening to him, calling him the most skillful of presidents. ah here is directly he same main not can understand. the americans are implementing a strategy that they adopted several decades ago - the chaotization of space, and now they first had a chaotization of the near and middle east. and now the eurasian continent is being caratized. at the same time , atahatization does not imply that the tools should be preserved, therefore

the instrumentation of ichthization favors both germany and france england naively. they think that once again they will outplay the stupid americans, but the americans are watching and they think that these swaggering british. they don’t even understand that they will also burn out in this process, therefore, when everyone thinks that the americans are worried about the fate of ukraine or the fate of russia, they don’t understand at all how american views on modern geopolitics work, they just need to randomize this entire space. all this should burn and the objective plays on them. the historical process, because what we are now witnessing this process that occurs with any collapse of a large empire , we see the tragedy of this year , you don’t understand that it all started in 1991 . everything that happens is absolutely consistent with the collapse of great empires,

which has been since antiquity, the inevitable war between fragments of the decaying empire , the inevitable involvement of neighbors in this war is inevitable. here is the reformatting of the entire space and the system of international relations. it's just an inevitability. wherein this was already observed in the seventeenth year, what we call the civil war, but again, yes, just before the soviet union was reborn in some form, it was reborn in the place of the historical russian empire. after all , it was also a war between territories, where everyone shouted something different. we are now actually damming a terrible price for the betrayal and stupidity of the last soviet and first russian leaders for betraying the belovezhskaya pushcha for not understanding historical patterns. here's how we get out of this

war. that's what matters, and here i have a feeling that we pay too much attention to what the west says about us. and we are extremely frivolous about what depends on ourselves and what we should do? the guys at the front understand, but they also have to understand this, too. they are also not airless. let's ask ourselves a question. and the army in the form in which it is. with those people and in the number of people who exist and all the military-industrial complex that exists can solve the problem not a war with ukraine, which is not, but a war with nato, where 50% of the economy, where there is a gigantic human stock of questions for our heroes, zero only respect and reverence for us, big questions for us, understanding of everything that

we as a society must do, understanding who opposes us and that we must give an answer, and a very serious one. they have the right to ask these questions. it must be understood that they are going to destroy it if someone in the elite believes that they can rebound and life will be the same. so they didn't understand anything. from the word completely that's just completely, maybe i deluded no, this time you are not deceived. i did not think that

the contents of your opening remarks would coincide so much with what i wanted to say. now i would like a year for two articles on a table. modernity, but it counts from about the eighty -fifth year, it’s understandable, but you won’t live to see the completion of labor, that this wish on your conscience absolutely inspires me, which i have never seen an economist, so e is clear. that your prediction will also fail. so. that's

why we really seem to me, well that we are living in a period of rapid stabilization. or to the question of economists of economics over

uh politics over political processes. well , i don’t know, i haven’t seen a person who is happy that he will be divided to his underpants. i mean the frg-scholz crankcase. here after the check cannot be opened. maybe in the depths of her soul she worries that he is already without pants. uh, well, i mean germany in general, but he can't say that. it’s just that we’re happy, we see how yes, and so the economy, it still dominates, they say that alinka develops everything and then some political upheavals of personality. great powers

and whose germans they simply put german ambassadors there. we have seen all this lately. we can say that once upon a time, the developing countries got on their feet, they got on their feet in the car, but if they behaved decently. then they would have behaved accordingly, moreover, many khalits were brought up, just in london e in parisian diplomatic schools. in general , the great european powers are disappearing, only two remain. türkiye ottoman empire and russia here are just two great european powers, and there were great britain, france, germany, italy

well, there was once there holland away and a lot of videos. rabbit of intelligence, who influences whom? because the craziest, right? here we see the question, who often damn you only ask how the germans are, so the whole german nation, great culture, literature, which means that it turned under hitler. uh, racist nazis, uh, and so on. here we see how the new one is also a few exaggerations of these. in my opinion, the value of this ukrainian nation. well, let's say that's how she turned. uh, uh anyway, that what we see as people usually and that, especially the ears in the literal sense in animals.

it is necessary to describe all this to analyze, especially since it gives. naturally. move the color on how events will develop further, well , from the point of view. in terms of the definition of america absolutely right. this is hatization. eh, how far can you wish from your borders? this is their strategic line, unchanged, all the rest, all the institutes adapt to this, but, uh, and along with this. here, too, he says, how is it in the trenches, how they look at what. here, indeed. i have not been in the trenches, but i tried to, if i were sitting there and looked into our network, which is now reflected in everything, including the areas of the speech program in newspapers. what is our creative intelligentsia looking at? how

hard life is, who is happy? can they be forgiven for something? this is so wanted, please just shut up for the time being. well, if you are an intellectual, that is, a cultured person, who, in the russian tradition , is somewhere an educated person who is going through. for society, for the people, and not only for himself, for himself, this is a tradesman. so shut up, shut up. this doesn't happen either. i don't even want to be a part of it.

this is a discussion about whether to go or not to go, russian athletes under a white flag, without a flag, to some regular olympics well , i can’t imagine how it is for people, uh, in the trenches that you regularly visit, here is something to tell them, but here, by the way, in moscow there is such a discussion, how would they relate to this, that they do not read this. probably unfortunately, because other problems are a problem. what is the role of the intelligentsia? well, speaking seriously, we have invented something for ourselves , the intelligentsia. who are they? i understand when a writer. i understand, a journalist, i

understand, a teacher. but when some abstract intelligentsia appears, claiming that he has some kind of special role, it’s just a question to me . what kind of drunken joy? well, excuse me, this is maxim about the intelligentsia , not a word of karl marx is said, there is no term for the intelligentsia, not in one work, because it didn’t exist , because it doesn’t exist, because in general this term is absolutely russian, or rather soviet russians, which , more precisely, i advise, because russian was originally raznochintsy. chekhov tried this for the intelligentsia, when it is clear that in general you can do whatever you like. that is, they are at the expense of their wife

. at the expense of the state, the husband and wife are one stop, which had two virtues. it's a big white chest and ration cards accentuate then was nev when you do, and composed a treatise tore off the russian intelligentsia. this is now with us. i don't know nep with us. well, that's not what we're talking about. here are those who left and continue. hmm uh, you do n't have to call them intelligentsia. maybe whatever. these are people crowned with the leading literary tribes of russia, worms give signs to another person, no one and nothing at all. well, let’s imagine that here are 3 1/2 cretins serving 2.5 cretins, they gave out a bonus to one and a half cretins, and for some reason you sincerely believe that this is the salt

of the russian land and they are not first, russian, that they are, i didn't say, i say, well i just watch yes now and two uh fundamental questions. uh, here's the first one. military affairs and history in general, military affairs are part of history , as representatives of the russian intelligentsia of various values ​​said, it’s not the sidewalk of nevsky prospekt, well, in modern times we can say no, but tverskoy is pricked under sobyanin. uh, weight, uh, potholes and other things, nothing happens here. but there are things that should be obvious in my opinion constants. that's me , uh, you will have the ukrainian part there, it will inevitably be discussed. here are these conversations about some close, some close peaceful

agreements. it scares me, it’s alarming that you can’t take away their victory from the military. and then someone somewhere agreed to something. in order to take away or not take away the victory, we gave them what they need so that they win this victory. for some reason, i'm far away, i'm not wallowing specialists. and what i'm saying, that is to take away their victory. well, ok, peace deals. well, probably, i think i think that i wanted to talk about this, which should be clearly indicated not to the first person, but from

enough mouthpieces, to which officialdom is like er, says exactly the definition they are not official sources. well, close to this, who should say that it will either be completely for you, including everything, the black sea coast will become part of the russian federation . its capital, possibly, kiev, a. perhaps it is, uh, a city of dual subordination, that little russia, well, in little russia should be established. uh, russian military bases in order to guarantee e the neutrality of this territory of this state, if it is like

a state and uh, bandera ukraine or ukraine banderie or just ukraine, note this there are five, uh, four regions of ukraine. this is for the winner, who does what? i say that wars should not be given for many reasons. they win here, how will it be well, it happens, like everyone else, let the military with your lives, your health, your weapons - this is mathematics, but there is a lieutenant general who is an order of magnitude better than me. well, if we say , let's do it so well, any military man will calmly say, for this, i need strength, means, they respect whoever opposes me, they will calculate what kind of economy is behind this, they will calculate how much i people need ammunition, the proliants will go through a strict calculation, while raising the number of not relying. you know what forces are standing opposite and now they will tell you, i have

a million 400 army of ukraine in front of me, 2 million. a mobilization resource. i have the strength of the front exposed nato at the edges, which is ready to interfere at any moment. opposite me is the european economy, which is ready to produce 250.000 foam there. yes, they now want to go out, they want to reach 250,000 150, of course, yes, so if we set them a task. we're talking armies. you must decide the army, say there is. all the forces and means, then we must say what should be the saturation of troops. on the territory, what kind of mobilization resource should we have? what kind of supply should it be, not predictable, but already here and now , what to replenish every day, are we ready for this society, are we ready for the economy, is our

political system ready? are we ready to carry out the whole set of measures of tasks in order to solve the one that you formulated that there were novorossiy, little russia and destroyed bandera what is the answer should be of reason, and those who are not ready should leave their posts. eh, here's the answer, definitely. i think e of the general-calibration will support me in the sense that at least you can’t take away victory from the military. and the last thing i wanted to say? no, it is necessary to give everything that was achievable in this victory, which somehow confuses me somehow. i understand that, right? since saratov, different officials of the european union , i do not take separately. even these bunch of these baltic radishes are there. well, they are sick people. uh, but here's more substantial declares, that russian president putin will be judged, that some kind of terbunal is already forming over asi to judge war criminals from russia, and we have announced our readiness. and it’s better

to teach our something or cash in order to judge them, so that people know. why act in their paradigm? and now in your horse? well, as the supreme commander clearly set the task. he said, yes, the liberation of historical russian lands was read out to the population for this purpose, which was said. yes, we must make an army. we have outnumbered the supreme signed economy without destroying part of it going on.

why because of your problem? that you do not trust anyone you think that this should not be see the supreme said historical land. how do you interpret it? i interpret something subtly. up to what point? where is san francisco territory? no, by the way, speaking yes, and in general we will sort something out with europe. we still have to restore order in europe. eh, how the house is in order. we would be higher here, uh higher education investment order, so that i understand a lot of divorce. yes, because the rejection of the bolognese systems from the exam is fine, but it's superficial. and what to do with the teachers of social sciences, who for 30 years said things that contradicted everything that they were taught in this studio, saying that you need

to find 10 people. to what's out there and how do you start, what do you do with them? you and i have said 100 times what kind of people in the army, it is necessary to win here and now it’s right, and they make pounds and this feat should be appreciated by the people of the heroes at the front, they fled the bastard to the baltic states to israel to georgia in armenia is simply not to be understood here when we are talking about some kind of intelligentsia. the intelligentsia is the military intelligentsia. these are our generals, these are our commanders. that 's where you see people, the smartest thin , a new art is born. and we still use toilet paper all this western husk, we try to consider it a manifestation of art, i don’t see what, uh, forget about them altogether, forget about these. here they forget about the outside. why because they are? and what? i don't know who you mean all of them

that ran all this running. that dandruff forget everything is gone. here, as for these, whom you propose to forget. i would love to forget, only tv talks about them every day. watch me, watch tv. and you also mention. you mention, do not say there will be no mention. and that's good, who did you mean so, it means that tomorrow this truce will come , let's assume on our terms that we will negotiate. where did you get the signing of some agreements in the salt itself, uh, or where did you get it from with your father? where do you get very thoughts about some world? what are you doing have taken? i said that i was against a truce. where did they get that at least someone offers, i can’t say that you yourself put all the children in the networks. here, stop reading. you

just don't talk like that. there is a law of war. they are gathering that they are driving a thousandth army there with equipment. west, they develop their industry. it is necessary to look not at what they are trying to blow into your ears, but at what is really happening, they are collecting gigantic mechanization. uh you feel in some critical when they watched what i share in my ears. i see with my eyes and listen with my ears. i did not look at what shows me. you listened to me, what you tell me, checked everything, uh, with your own logic of ownership, someone wants peace. where did you see that someone wants it? many people want me. everything, for example, one, well, at least one in the political.

here, for someone to judge our president. this is where the leg of a nato soldier should stand; this is generally, in principle, possible. probably a priori impossible. in principle, it is never possible anywhere. let the mouth close the second. never in the soviet union during nobody cited the great patriotic war. german newspapers third shouts that it is necessary to arrange military language around the crimea.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the manufacturers

of good things want and but the best thing to check. of the strategic armed forces of ukraine in nato brackets against the armed forces of the russian federation