everything, you will see manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it is best to check. fifth, this is a cover operation for the deployment of strategic groupings of the armed forces of ukraine in nato brackets against the armed forces of the russian federation, if at all it is specifically defined in this way, so there is no need to be mistaken here. and in general, of course, our scar space. you have to be serious to turn off all these

foreign media and start working with your own. i already said that we still lack souvenirs. well, probably rosfor only which will clearly dose this information, because what we receive today from official sources. unfortunately, not everyone gets it. if such a discussion began today in this audience. so, sorry. this is true, as it is, so i understand it, i seem to be arguing with one. this is exactly what i said, that against the armistice it is impossible to select military losses without a double interpretation. i didn't have it either. the next moment from the current concentration the activities of the entire state during the period of preparation for war and during the conduct of hostilities in all spheres of political economic social whatever you want , this is the concentration of the result there, because all

the attention is there, and we can clearly see all these shortcomings that exist today the state is not the armed forces what should be understood? in this paradigm, one must see that we are well aware that we are at war at the start, they talked about this when we ask me. and we can defeat nato, but if you take the math says, vladimir's daughter calculate the balance of forces and means better case we can probably defend ourselves, because four to one is here. let's start with that, now, based on this attention to the question. and how to win at least such a situation has developed? and how to win here begins? and let's mobilize the new wave. let 's first set the most important priorities, including in the defense industry, and in general in the entire economic complex of the country, because not only defense industrial complexes provide victory in this second century patriotic war. and today it is extremely clear where

to send it, all the efforts of all people are gathering what would be sights for thermal imagers, and we need a breakthrough in space, the key word is a breakthrough in space. we need a breakthrough in precision weapons. moreover , even our closest allies to belarus at some points, such as us , jumped very seriously and, moreover, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. just take a license and use it to mass-produce what is needed today. we need to spit today theater rights and take this weapon to copy. so it was done during the second world war for us the great patriotic war. it’s just not to rack your brains to copy, and at all our factories , which we copied during the war, they copied katyusha , for example, a mortar of the twenties-thirty -eighth year, one even in the warehouse is still stored alone with this with the german eagle. yes, and we also stole from them. they have drawings and other time with me. this is

the main thing that the industrial complex works in cat mode during the war, because there is no time to swing there and you just have to do it. but after all, the most important thing in this matter is that we are talking today, i may be expressing, probably, the opinion that, including my voters , who constantly write to me in the telegram channel. you say responsibility for fulfilling responsibility for non-fulfilment, and when we talk about the sledgehammer of the volunteers , now i will call the volunteers this way. this is nothing but the concentration of world responsibility is extremely clear to everyone. you are not fulfilling a combat mission, a today the combat mission is not only in the trench today the combat mission. here today is a combat

mission at every enterprise. today i just know i would have been and will be literally. here i'll go after march 8, i'll fly out and i'll be myself at the invitation. i will try to do separately on this issue. completely completely different armor, completely dynamic, completely fire control system, completely thermal imager. everything else is everything for the crew. so it's a different car. today it is not just profitable, it is urgently needed and people work hard three shifts. and they just work hard, and i didn’t see a single one there, who would complain to me. they say i'll do it now. do not worry, we will make a plan so that it is not worth doing this approach, but, unfortunately, there are other points. if other points from the key point that

it is still clear that the allies have two army fleet, but, nevertheless. today, all those who are so let's directly sympathize with us, probably, our state should be involved in this matter today, and the dkb should probably be together at work today, a clear understanding, that if not with us, then against us today it became extremely clear that the enemy of the people you spoke about, right? this is stalin and not it turns out there are enemies. to the people? they do exist. here you have something open. so it must be acknowledged. and deal with the enemies of the people as with the enemies of the people, without racking their brains. i am doing it seriously, i say, from this measure of responsibility, the main thing will be the measure of responsibility. with us everything will go with us and industry. the defense will go with us. get around in the trench. they don't even remember food. there or a piece of clothing.

they remember about ammunition, about shells, about weapons that they need, about protection , about electronic warfare, what they are going to fight with today and they are definitely not going to put up with anyone to talk, or even they have a head, it’s even in principle, no one exists. that's what they are, and the people here on earth. here are two things he wants victories and justice victory justice victories, so that our armed forces are provided with everything they talked about won and justice, that the whole word is the one that is sabotaged here the process needs to stand as a barrier, well, to the wall by and large. that's what the people want, this is a massive why it's normal everyone talks about it . maybe you can’t talk about emotional, but today it is extremely clear that this world of responsibility must come. and the sooner it comes, the faster, we will go not just to victory, but where are the frontiers that we need, and then this ratio, which says four to four to one, but something needs to change. i have no doubt that the west

will deploy ammunition. well, i have no doubt that with a normal approach, we are in the state of russia and those countries that sympathize with us also need to work with them. need to work. it is quite to give a decent answer. or just in ukraine , namely, in the confrontation with nato, there will be a cold war. we passed it. we just stayed talking about these years, when i served in germany, and he every 15 minutes it's time. the fighters were coming we'll be on duty. it was all right and left shellah. down, momentarily was blow everything about we knew this and we must all come to this too, probably, we will come. well, kolya, we don’t have to go like that, nowhere, and only in this is our survival of our russia in the victory of another option. no ads. dear friends, i invite you to our new edition of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called

how much will 2 + 2 be? i hope you understand why it's called that? looking forward to seeing you? i’ll start the high bar with one story, i got a call yesterday from a person who, probably, can be attributed to what is called the chekhov intellectual in the best sense this word is a wonderful artist, by the way, the artist can’t give his last name, but he told me dmitry. are they all going to come back. they lived, they will all return here and will sit on television again. we

will give up. and i reassured him as best i could, saying that there is no task for civil society in russia to make sure that there are no such people, but this is to the fact that even well, really serious in the true, in the best sense , intelligent people, there is a rejection of this. that she left betrayed that pours dirt, but it still expects to return. and two small corrections, but i think i absolutely agree with what i said, only two small corrections. the first betrayal was in the late eighties and nineties. it was a betrayal not

of leaders. it was a betrayal of the elites. these driving, they did not come from mars, these leaders were the result of a completely natural development of those soviet underscores. yes, i even said more communist elites who by that time were frankly born. and in this sense, we really need to understand the role of the elites in such crisis situations. yes, the role of the individual in history is exceptionally great, and we understand that sometimes a strong personality can turn the tide, but we must think about how our elite. she was not self-appointed. she, if you like, was gained through suffering by the country, she should be responsible, i agree with you completely retreat. i'm now looking at

the footage above them, some laughs. and i look at the footage when it goes to the front, it seems that the old equipment has been modernized, firstly, i like what i see for the most part, and secondly, what kind of technical potential our people have that from two obsolete models of military equipment to do what is needed now for this front, but having said this is the elite this is the engineering elite is not self-appointed real people who took it and did it, but i absolutely agree that in the conditions when it became clear that we were opposed. here is another very small correction. we don't have to resist. japan is not a member of nato and south korea

is not a member of nato, but nevertheless, they supply both technicians and pakistan, we do not include israel in nato not new things. we are confronting a colossal assistant to a coalition that is capable of waging a war of annihilation against us in at least four theaters of war. and to think that we can even defend ourselves against this coalition without clearing the elite from adhering absolutely alien, meaningless, non -functional, very often weak-willed elements and without having done so. we uh uh mobilization is the elite. well, in my opinion, this is all very frivolous. we are mobilizing society, and in the society of reality , elements of mobilization are very visible, by the way.

problems that have arisen in some institutions of higher education, including culture. yes, when someone turned out to be no longer able to earn money in russia. after all, this is a consequence of the mobilization of society on the mobilization of society without the mobilization of the elite is meaningless. therefore, we need to look very carefully. how and by what methods can it be quite sparing, yes, to mobilize the elite to prepare for a new round of confrontation with this global coalition that has set itself the task of destroying russia, the second small amendment regarding randomization. by the way, i wrote an article about how the americans think, e, the device in europe, but here it is interesting, everyone goes to washington and ask for a label for the great reign of europe, and no one received it. i thought, why didn't anyone get it? and

i wrote four scripts there. well, three of them are quite obvious. and here is the fourth scenario, when he named more europe good and different. yes, this is chaos, well , the americans put some of europe for themselves. they always leave to stay. they are even from afghanistan left so as to stay at least tried. there, i have a hypothesis that they will leave for themselves the western mediterranean, not the eastern, which may become for them not the balkans, and definitely not the baltic sea, which is really where there will be an attempt to construct chaos - it will be in the baltic, this is it. i tell you for sure, and the western mediterranean zone of gibraltar and north africa in the area shed. that's where they can always go back. it seems to me that yes, hatization, well, not really

in any case, they will try to catch on to europe . hmm, and now four about four processes, let's say so. hmm. the points that they consider to be fundamental and then the withdrawal of the first indo-pacific region to the region did not work out for the americans as a result of their attempts to construct the indo-technical region did not receive a global south. indiana was not dragged into the anti-tech regions against china with europe, we discussed this the second very important point. they really choose to randomize in one form or another, but i think that they will still try to stay there in security. well, actually, how they communicated with hitler, that is, through feathers and through portugal, spain is also a wonderful scheme, it was the third point china took a break. this is a pause. ah, this is a pause against the west. china has drawn all the conclusions for itself, china has understood that

there are no priests, no options to act as a peacekeeper mmm. well, there is no china yet, china has taken a break, but this is a pause, and this does not mean that it is benevolent. for us , this means that it will be used by china to prepare for a clash with the west. well, the last point and in the usa, the clock is obviously ticking completely, that the latest events in the usa indicate a transition to clan contradictions from a bureaucratic channel to a completely political one. and the clock is ticking for two more reasons, but on the one hand, the americans were able to postpone for yes, apparently , for quite a long time the debt crisis has been like this, but the political system is in a half-life phase, because if, well, this world behind the scenes, or rather in washington, so to speak, the non-party consensus elite, as

whatever. call the world bosses, as dmitry likes to say, the global bosses, so, uh, they could drag the paratroopers through. well, yes, then there would be this departisan consensus. could be installed. they succeeded, so the clock for the american elite is ticking. and this is very important. so these are all four points. yes, they unequivocally testify that the americans are doomed to aggravate relations either with china or with russia. well, they will not aggravate with china now. they obviously don't, but that's what we you need to prepare for the americans to escalate. but this is all talk about the fact that let's divide the thirty-eighth parallel to the fifty-ninth to 80, but this is well, how are the parallels? well, it's not korea, no matter, but it's, well, it's like a symbol of this historical parallel. yes, it’s generally possible

to divide it all in a square nested way , i really absolutely can agree. it all really looks like a house curtain before a new round of exacerbation. we would not oversleep him, michael is wonderful in the west. you know, forget about those who are trying to kill you. this is a very risky business. i think we need to remember our enemies all the time. yes, there is no need to quote them, but in order for them not to create problems for us , this is possible only in one case, if we constantly and energetically create problems for them. well, if we don't protect their intellectual property, here the ministry of culture said that we need to protect the intellectual property of hollywood in russia, this is an important area of ​​our activity. and it is needed at all cancel, because if you do not

hurt the enemy, then he will not understand that he is doing something wrong, he will destroy you. while there are enough resources, but about the resource potential. much has been said here and from different points of view. that is why systemic sabotage work is being carried out against us. and why in the west there are no big rides no big accidents, so to speak, no big disasters. no, well , there in the state. yeah, something happened, but this is within the framework of the usual american debilizma, as i understand it, it happens. yes why don't we we can stop funding those who kill us in all sorts of ways. in general , we continue to finance. in general, we continue to withdraw the country's capital, we continue to do this under conversations, patriotism. everything is wonderful. good things you know, uh, drop a nuclear bomb. easier than to call for paying taxes in the russian federation, this is an amazing phenomenon. but it's true. this is true, but at the factories of the military-industrial complex. we have 2023. this is true. and

i can light it up not only as a person, who enters there at the front gate, well, like a man who climbed through a hole in the fence a couple of times, well, people saw him off and explained , as a matter of fact, but financial and economic policy, dear colleagues of the nineties, have not gone away, as they continued , comrades . gaidar so they continue to this day. there can be an infinite number of details to cite, that is, fundamentally there is one problem that we have not yet sewed. the problem is very simple, which is higher than private interests or public interests. that it is necessary to stimulate private initiative. yes, everything is wonderful. well, let's say in germany they have a provision , in the basic law, that if private property is contrary to the public interest, so much the worse for private property, therefore, when it occurred to them to nationalize russian factories to hell. they did it without even coughing when the russians start talking guys. well, under certain

circumstances. you see, looking into my eyes explains, but we can't do it. this is impossible. why is it impossible for us to have no laws guys, well, let's sit down and write. you are all smart. no, this is impossible and permissible, when i give examples of germany, people freeze, but reboots do not give in. yes , you understand about responsibility. are there criminals? i'm not talking about saboteurs. i'm not talking about thieves. i'm talking about saboteurs, terrorists and murderers. and if they are not canceled in relation to them, the moratorium on the death penalty, then they will feel completely chocolate. they will be sure that in which case they don’t raise their paws in a year, in two, in three, they will be changed or the situation will change or their propaganda will turn out to be correct, they will be released, and so on. it does not work responsibility. unfortunately, it provides for things that are extremely

unpleasant, but when you start talking about it, then the cry that, so to speak , the terrorist himself and so on is sometimes the softest thing that you have to hear your side. here is the fundamental question. the above is often interesting or higher public. this is it. main. in my opinion, problem in today's society. that's for sure, because when it comes. dear decent people and begin to quote. god forgive me when such an oligarch is not up to oleg kiselyov, who said in the zero years that, well, i serve with my money. i’m an appendage of my money, so how can my homelands be a place where we are bad at money, but when people who really deal with public policy quote me this, they explain that well, how are we going to force business, and such a business is not productive and manage all sorts of paying taxes when it is more convenient for them. and working with russia through offshore

pads and this convenience is higher than the interests of the existence of the russian federation, this is no exception. this is just the financial economic block. unfortunately, it is generally correct, because state regulation can talk about taxes, we can talk about that , we can talk about property, we can talk about civil rights. russian federation for life, because we do not comply with this rule for life i guarantee people with a living wage that can somehow exist, while having money for it, when we say that since the arbitrariness of monopolies is almost the only free enterprise that the state really recognizes. we rest exactly on this, if we want to produce something not in a piecewise discontinuous mode, not at separate enterprises of a single vc, but in order for us to have scientific and technical progress under each bush , in this case we must fix that

public good. unfortunately for me, how for an economist who looks at the world from a market point of view above the private point yes , it is necessary to stimulate morally and financially. everything else and super profits to pay stalinist premiums come in and everything else but so far it’s coming out, dear businessman. wait , how come? how can i pay higher taxes? it's wrong, we will find ourselves in a situation where the minister comes out in the duma and says, well, how is it? the entrepreneurs told me that i need to do this. so what, that society from this will be uncomfortable. that's what you want me to go against the entrepreneur, and everyone knows with what entrepreneurs. he met the day before. from what exactly is the freak so that, unfortunately, no matter what we discuss, we will go into details and die in these details, because today the question is in existence. not even russia yes, they are not the russian state.

today, the question is about the existence of russian culture, and those mistakes that are now fashionable to call cumulative for this, but made in the 17th century and made a couple of times in the twentieth century, they are working on the mistakes and believe that now they have fixed it. and their task is understood by them not in the solution of some local issues, but in the elimination of russian civilization and russian culture of the fundamental subsistence minimum. what is the problem now? and our constitution says the right. citizens of the russian federation , which means that if i am a citizen of the russian federation , then i must. gotta get why because a person no is the principle of basic

income.

this we never lost. no, this is a device that finds the way off.

this is liquidation. sorry everyone and social support. this is a very important question. you do not need most of the citizens of russia now now give a gift don't go off topic. i understand when it comes to pensioners people show up.