we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and most importantly, but it is best to check. the fact that what is happening now and the process

of returning taiwan is the scale of the reorganization of international relations, not even to the second world or the first, but to the 19th century, that is, the scale of changes. well, as the chinese say in a centenary, and maybe more, that is, indeed, such a story is going on a colossus before our eyes. we one of the authors of the restructuring of these problems and the korean problem will catch up, that is, everything will change and, of course, nuclear weapons. it is logical that it will be used, because when it comes to world hegemony, every means is used to preserve it. well, the fact that the rhetoric is sharp is very scurvy. not that there are rumors that a xi jinping will arrive in march. they are in may. well, it doesn't matter to us ourselves, when he arrives in march in may and so on. maybe he is in a hurry and i will not refute these rumors and eat. uh, quite weighty confirmation that this is indeed what is happening, that there will indeed be such an extensive visit .

an excellent signing and so on, but i think that if the chinese are really in a hurry, then they really understand the position that the united states will use against china, that is , the pressure will increase right before our eyes, including the threat of a scenario for means of involvement china into taiwanese provocation. you told vladimir vladimirovich that there is a reform of the state council of the people's republic of china government. so china is really called the central bank, uh, it has become the number one thing that reforms, and the chinese comrades, they are likely to really change the head of the people's bank of china. but the most interesting thing is that the department for banking regulation is directly subordinated to the insurance supervising the vice-premier, or the prime minister of some other unknown details. everything means haze and the sec. that is, the topic remains the central bank only with the currency control. but well, again, for us it can also be. that is, an interesting model

does not have to be changed; it is not necessary to break agreements with washington; it can be replayed internally according to the chinese scenario and also force, let’s say, part of the departments to be reassigned directly to the prime minister. well, or already as it will be more convenient to optimize this process. that is, indeed, the more sovereign the economy, the less. she needs to move the microwave, leonidovich will not let her lie to move in her fairway, not to focus on international currency settlement means dollars and so on, and the people's bank itself, or as it was customary in the ussr to call the state bank. it should be more migrating to such a dash to the chinese statistical office subordinate to gazprom he already has people's bank with them. no, of course not. well, formally, we are also not particularly independent, but subordinate to the prime minister , indeed in china, subordinate to the state council of kainf. yes, that means prime ministers and so on. i'll tell you to live according to leninsky. you

cannot be free from society. central bank - it's not bad. you remember, well, yes, indeed, but nevertheless, that is, now a person who is headed by the central bank of china , well, and there are two of them, one is a party leader, the other is a real leader, which means it’s not unrealistic, an executive thing is a leader, he studied in the usa for a long time and and so on, and before him , in general , one person was in charge of the central bank under the three presidents of the prc, that is , the chairmen leave and the people's banks come, china remains such a stronghold of china's involvement in the global financial system. here. here, too, there is something to learn. but, perhaps, that is, i want to focus on something. here we are, perhaps they will come, they already talk a lot about this, but we also have one. let's say, a semi-independent crypto-colony of the middle state in taiwan, here taiwan hosts ukrainian parliamentarians, taiwan supports ukraine with tens of millions of dollars, and taiwan holds rallies in support of ukrainians on the central square. yes, we have

taiwan here, e, netrebko cancels the concert , which means there should have been a concert on sunday, march 5, instead, the ukrainian ballet is dancing cancels tchaikovsky's ballet and adds another hopak instead. yes, i don’t really understand, well, i really respect the ministry of the country, where you know the russian federation, how i respect it, how we all respect the hard work here , and so on, but i don’t see a single reaction. mida i think it's worth looking into, especially in anticipation of a visit from a dolphin to such behavior from the taiwanese side. we have a legally effective international radio in taiwan we have internships that are given to our students in taiwan so we have a purchase of 20% notebook this year is the 22nd of the past. this is taiwan billions of rubles go to taiwan dollars. so we expand, and they cancel us. they support ukraine, maybe at least start with cosmetic steps to kick out international radio. taiwan from here to the directorate,

which is incomprehensible. what does the zhirovka do useful to close the representative office of taiwan in moscow ? so here the society is the military-political state of the russian chinese union, and so on. just a recommendation. using your site, maybe the ministry of foreign affairs is listening and advertising will time some actions as a gift to the visit. dear friends, i invite you to our new edition of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called how much will 2 + 2 be? i hope you understand. why is it called so? looking forward to seeing you?

and we talked with him about the fact that when you read all this and you observe, there really is a feeling of such an approach to some kind of armageddon with him. and you stand there like an armageddon. on really very kind, you can imagine armageddon, and whoever i’m talking about, he will be something wrong, but in this sense, even i would say, well, historically, when you look at those leaders of politicians, yes, which, as it were, were the cause of gigantic warlike cataclysms, well , somehow this has its own kind of grandeur. there, i don't know the body. yes , the scourge, god's smashed, the weight of the year defeated in

front of his troops, outraged. well , the queen but the majestic yes, there napoleon genghis khan some figures are even hitler the quintessence of evil, the fiend of hell, charisma, which made the stadiums sob, so to speak , this one, and here this one. here is a rather ridiculous character. who is mr. biden? he swear to god, it's a shame to die because of this. it's just somehow strange , somehow not at all cool , there is some kind of absurdity in this in everything. that's how it is, maybe they will tell me now, well, you started the war , stop talking about this nonsense. this is a banal regional conflict between two fragments

of the empire, which took place over these dozens of times nothing. where are you from? it's bad this is it, but it's the biden that turns it into a hell of a way to armageddon. well, this hearth is absolutely obvious here, of course, such a question arises. well, wait like this. where is it? this is still history, it is subjective, but does it really all depend on this character, or is marx and vladimir ilyich lenin right when they say, if you do not understand the class essence of history, you will never explain it well, you have to think about this question, but we know with you what answer this has, but in principle, but absolutely ridiculous, but this character. but the matter is serious, and the affairs are archi, this is all serious. absolutely into the abyss and it

is becoming more and more real, you know, this, unfortunately, unfortunately, so i cannot but please anyone. in this sense, to please in this, and about in this context, but also this is an article in the new york times, but also some kind of absurdity, too, like how stupid it is, absolutely something like that. well, i'd say i paid attention. i don’t know, by the way, he spoke to dimitri, but for me somehow in all cases, in the light of this article , the terrorist attack in bryansk is more understandable . yes, actually also quite ridiculous bloody but ridiculous. but the fact that they participated in it, as it were, the russians. it’s like this one here, it’s not by chance that ukrainian and russian ones are here. that is, sort of, yes, the partisans, sort of, like this, and not unofficial. this is not ukraine, this is not

zelensky, this is a resistance group and i have this feeling, that is, i don’t have a feeling. i am absolutely convinced. what exactly is for this it was bryansk that did it so that this article appeared, this is, as it were, one line. i do not rule out that the next will be the appearance. yes, and in the next there will be the appearance of some surnames. russian surnames with russian and passports, which, as it were, which they were looking for , this is what they do. this is what their hands did. you see, that is utter absurdity. well, that's how they work. it is as if the style of such a current one will be found, ukrainian and russian passports soaked in water. yes, what are the troeboshirovs in their time. they found, probably the wreckage this e tower these arab passports. what, then, already called next to have found the qur'an

data? well, also a ridiculous story. actually, if you look, just like someone found the koran there is something like that. now, they read this administration. everything is very similar, by the way, everything is very. it looks like the script writers, apparently one, but much aged during this time, as it were already this, but already. well the script. it is generally very similar, so you don’t sculpt, in general, the story from this article, as far as it is concerned. that is, we started well, yes, it's very good that we have banks really work. and in general, we feel, in principle, as if normal life. this is certainly good, and we are this. it should be, but there is one thing, but you understand there is

one thing, but which, it seems to me, is not quite right. here i am telling my emotions over the past couple of days through the media. here i am watching tv. yes, a report, in my opinion, your channel of russian military correspondents. now there are wonderful, in general, a whole series, in addition to our classics , cool guys. and generally amazing. here he is makes a report. there they take out our wounded soldier to the front line with these guys with simple men with these ordinary , seemingly ordinary faces, the driver

of this uaz loaf of loaf. i look further russian clubs have made a number of wonderful purchases of legionnaires. millions of dollars i have a question like this now actual maybe it makes sense. buy a new loaf or 10 such loaves or buy something else? well how will it fit? i am an ordinary russian citizen. i'm sure many people have these questions. it's like this, as if appropriate, here in this situation it's not bread, nor butter, nor it's not to say this, not uh not some. there are even household items. it is appropriate today to spend millions of rubles

dollars on this, when you have a military man driving a 76-year-old loaf. it's okay, but it's this turmoil. well, well, then we always say that we are a country for which this is fate. this is it, maybe for us. that is there is no other way out for us. this is threatening. we are threatened with extinction by our enemies want. we are trying to be spectators people. convince the russian of this and what he thinks. he thinks, well, what is fate? if well, i turn on this one this morning today, your wonderful program, which listens, i always hear your remark that some kind of businessman paid 5 million rubles there in order to connect to the power grid. in dollars dollars, and in germany it is 500 rubles. just in germany who spoke i have

a question. well guys. well, well, how can it be? well, well, how, well, the war is going on, we talk about it all the time all the time all the time talking about how, well, how is it, maybe for me, in general, this whole reform is chubas. it was just bullshit. from the point of view of the market, it did not give anything at all. well, he will probably correct me, maybe, but i understand that it’s easy to divide the great energy system. cue, and just milking in parts is not, there is nothing marketable in the market. well, then it must be nationalized. i'm not a supporter of everything in general nationalization. do you understand what is some industries that also work. no need to touch, but here, but when i hear this, i again have the same thoughts. i understand that a simple citizen has the same, and we tell him that the fate of your fate depends on it.

but then it does not depend on it, and then why be surprised that we all the time say, well, no, there is no such internal understanding in society, because there is this, you understand, these things need to be regulated somehow from above and something needs to be then explain. and if we don't explain it, then then doubts are born in the souls of people, either this is a betrayal of the circle, or it is not so important at all. this is what we are being told here. they gather in the studio there at solovyov’s and it all soars to us that our life , destiny, or so to speak, depends on it? and god forbid something happens to us there, you understand, after all , i have a feeling that once this idea was expressed again by your studio, by konstantin fedorovich, in my opinion, stifled. we all talked, after all. it seems to me that an element of such a body as the gko, headed by the commander in chief, would be relevant today.

if we are again talking about the fact that this really threatens our country. in the case there, god forbid, defeat, that we only need victory and this threatens us, er, with catastrophic consequences. then then people need to understand this, but now that's all. here. and so. i just explained it to you in 2 days. well, now, i understand that millions of russians have seen about the same thing and feel about the same thing, you know, and this is very important. this is what i'm saying, it doesn't measure what it says should be normal life should be this is all right. it's all right, but it has to be fair. here it should be still fair in order for people to understand that this is true. this is this this is, as they say, on the side of the truth. i agree, it doesn't mean that you started

just with what you showed, uh, and the meeting of the president and the speech. well, yes, not even a speech, but simply memoirs of the prime minister, which were focused on issues related to the domestic political economic agenda. uh, a very large part of the president's message to the federal assembly was also focused on socio-economic issues. and i think that this is not even just an indicator that life goes on despite the special military operation. this is a very serious indicator that our domestic policy and the blessing of citizens is not a victim of foreign policy, because the state that conducts foreign policy is a sacrifice that brings its own interests to the interests of its citizens. this state is doomed to perish. and by the way, i want to note that it is the united states america here, too, they are a good example that they use foreign policy in

order to solve, among other things, their own economic and any internal problems, eh, and here it is different with an exception. here is russia from the united states of america in this case the european countries, because how does the current foreign policy decide. any internal problems are completely incomprehensible to me, which is obviously incomprehensible to the citizens of the european states themselves, because the real moment the cash cow for americans are the european countries. and the further, the more obvious it becomes, by the way, i strongly advise you to read today's, if i'm not mistaken, the statement of the foreign ministry rom not the former us presidential candidate who was looking for yes, the europeans have already spent so many billions. yes, they have a price hike. yes, they do not accept refugees, you need to understand that we want them to do even more, otherwise have they done enough or not? it has nothing to do with the national interests of the united states, if translated from russian into russian, this translates as a problem, the sheriff's indians don't

care, so you do what you want, so spin around you do what you are told at the moment. er, in this case. here. it also seemed very interesting to me, uh, another report or article by the rent corporation that came out yesterday, where several theses were said. i will cite the first thesis, it says, uh, and the article begins with the fact that, as they say , that russian revanchism poses a threat to all citizens of the russian federation located in russia outside of russia there, do you doubt it or not? every time the thesis comes to your mind that everything was fine with russia until february 24th. and suddenly, for no apparent reason, a special military operation of revanchism can only be blamed on the side that you are the loser. the side with which you have equal cooperation and perceive it as an equal member. the so-called international community cannot engage in revanchism, because it did not lose,

it also participates on an equal footing, just like you. in this community, no one likes us considers. we are just a losing country for them, what's interesting? what is the way? they would like to see us. this article also talks about it in detail. there is a reference to, uh, 30 years of successful democracy building in ukraine. this is a direct quote from this text, 30 years of successful democracy. i'm not talking about the fact that, so every second election there ended with anti-constitutional coups about the murder and imprisonment of journalists in ukraine and about some kind of damn democracy in general. i even not about it. i'm talking about what they explain. why did it happen there? and somewhere not. they say, look at how many of our non-governmental organizations have worked in ukraine. how many people did we fund? and how would they directly intervene in all these issues. here is a visual result for you only by some amazing coincidence. everywhere where americans believe that they have successfully built a democracy.

be it cancer. be it libya. now ukraine is undergoing an absolutely complete disintegration of statehood. there's just no states already as such, as an alternative to this. look where you came, russian syria is in this place. we managed to save the statehood. yes, hard work. well, government. statehood remained there, and in fact remained. this nation was saved, because otherwise it would now be no different from libya , iraq, and from many other kingdoms, where i had time to visit the american democracy. and today, when we look at ukraine, we look into the crooked mirror in which we are this alternate reality if we hadn't jumped off the road we've been on since the 1990s . and us here apparently. two factors did the most important service. the first is our people, our population, which is the bearer of a huge historical institutional memory of a powerful

statehood, and which cannot be taken and so easily weathered from the population even after such a crushing blow just under the soviet union. the second is natural, the head of the country, who managed, starting from the 2000s , to reorient the country towards the path of its revival, uh, and. while i was reading this, i remembered just 2 days ago. uh, was uh, it was another anniversary of the fulton speech. and when now, of course, you read it about the features, when you read the reaction to it, there are stalin’s competitions, then you understand how relevant this speech is, because it seems to be a person and not an acting example of a minister, but the truth is in the presence of the current us president we always pay attention for a phrase. there the iron curtains came down. when well for me there is one key phrase, which is the only thing that should now have goal-setting. it is an association of fraternal english-speaking peoples. that's it in response

to this, joseph vissarionovich in his interview. e, he tells the truth that you know hitler at one time, considered the german people exceptional, and based on the fact that he speaks this language, churchill now speaks of the special role of those peoples who speak english, the first to come to the conclusion that from -for this, the germans should dominate and push around other people, the second came to the conclusion that dominating the whole world should be when we read what to say is not the throne, when every time we see these nervous hysterical statements that you are doing the way we say, no, you eat according to our rules. this is all based on a deep fanatical conviction of these people in their own exclusivity. it will take us to fight to the last ukrainian in the fire.

you can be killed anytime, anywhere. these are not objects, these are people. it amazes me what is not covered in western media or shut up and write what we need or look for a new job with independent journalists. ukraine is doing the same thing that it is doing with the donbass i was able to save only the soviet people fish others

are not here

we are for the breadth of education, interchainarity, fundamentality. i opposed the introduction. we have a system and moscow university did not introduce the bologna wall, when the system was being formed, all this was quite consistent with those ideas about the very

advanced. education is the creation of an image - this is the education of another person. there is a request for perfection to update it. the first car with scouts

the idea of ​​exclusivity itself did not appear now, and not even after churchill's speech, for many centuries. but there is one difference in the modern view. the west itself is exceptional from what has been characteristic of it for centuries , many, many centuries. the west is opposed to russia, it seems to me, the main reason is that the west sees itself in russia, but in parallel reality, because both the west and we consider ourselves the successors of the roman empire , so to speak.