for the buyer, instead of transferring the loan to another bank will not just left questions. if you don’t want to get confused in the intricacies of the real estate market, especially when it comes to loans, write to our telegram, we will ask the experts and we will definitely tell you about everything in our next instruction. hello on the air international review. my name is fyodor lukyanov today in the international review program. events of the week of the chronicles

veteran investigator seymour hersh, nevertheless woke up the volcano a month of his publication, which the us administration ordered the northern streams to be blown up, they diligently ignored it, but the question hung uncomfortably in the air and a volley was fired at it from the leading media calibers, it turns out that some ukrainian craftsman who was not associated with the state on his own initiative slammed his favorite brainchild, putin and the shredder. in what a dangerous world we live in almost anyone who wants to rent. as spiegel told us, the andromeda yacht can take and break the strategic communication of pan-european significance, it is ah-ah-ah-ah completely without protection, what’s next, and then fireworks

versions of conjectures, in which the essence of the issue will simply dissolve plausibly or not. what difference does it make, the more cinematic the version, the better the familiar one. for those who grew up on modern high-quality series, however, behind a talented game, the line of what is acceptable is lost, the one after which an unexpected denouement in the series comes, exhale admiringly. wow, and in life next week expires, the so-called grain deal agreement with the participation of russia, ukraine, the un and turkey in the withdrawal of agricultural products from the conflict zone to world markets. according to him, by the beginning of march of this year , about 23 million tons of grain, half of the cargo was exported from ukrainian posts. a quarter fell on corn on wheat.

and although initially the deal was considered as a program for the supply of grain to the poorest countries of the world, and its products were not received by those who most of all needed it , china became the leader in terms of the number of imports , followed by spain, turkey, and fourth and fifth places. italy and the netherlands, and only in sixth place was egypt, which received less than a million tons of grain along with this, was starving with a population of 170 million. a person received less than 10 million from the grain deal. germany imported more grain than kinia, and france got more agricultural products than europe's needy countries to the south only 3% of all deliveries came from sugar. even before the istanbul agreements, the influx of cheap ukrainian grain stabilized prices and provided the eu

with a record for the last 20 years sides. he created problems for local farmers. especially in poland, romania, bulgaria, hungary, the czech republic and slovakia, if earlier poland received no more than 6,000 tons of ukrainian corn, then last year more than one and a half million tons, and imports of ukrainian sunflower to bulgaria increased 25 times in most cases. these products are no longer profitable grain settled on local markets and caused a sharp decline in prices, which, against the backdrop of rising fuel and fertilizer prices, hit local producers as a result of the country eastern europe was required to pay compensation and block supply routes from ukraine. in addition, because of ukrainian dumping of grain. kuruzy and sunflower oil, the share of exports of these goods from russia has decreased , and although he says that the agreement allowed the return of grain to global markets and lowered

the prices of basic foodstuffs , nothing came of this deal for most starving countries. phew, grain agreements initially caused conflicting reactions. and it's not even a matter of what proportion of hypocrisy is in them and what exactly whether or not russia receives the question, in principle, there is an irreconcilable military confrontation in which all those involved see existential elements for themselves. and suddenly those same irreconcilables conclude a deal of a commercial nature to fill the market and trade with opponents, but on more acceptable terms for themselves, but in essence. and for him, this is like the same question. you can also ask about the supply of hydrocarbons , coal, metals in general, russian resources, which regularly enter the world market, including countries on the other side of the line

front, not to mention the pipelines pumping russian raw materials to the west, in fact, through the war zone with the same west. by the standards of the total wars of the 20th century is nonsense, but we are in another century, the conflict is played out in conditions of universal interconnectedness. it is in itself a weapon and a method of mutual deterrence, but as in the case of nuclear deterrence, the threat of use is more effective than its execution - a sharp break in economic ties between russia and the eu. last year, i had to deliver a knockout blow, first to russia from europe, then, on the contrary, as energy cooperation collapsed. the knockout did not happen in either case, the parties bear the costs, but adapt to the new conjuncture. in the case of grain negotiations, there are political aspects that perhaps outweigh the commercial

or military ones that do not. they are russia's relations with countries that are just friendly, let's talk about this with our good acquaintance. of course, there andrey maslov, we found him in odessa baby andrey hello, what most of all does not suit russia deal deal. it itself consists of two parts. there are security guarantees that russia has provided for the export of food from three ukrainian ports. and there is the assistance that he, er, undertook to provide russia so that our exports would not be vulnerable to unilateral sanctions. and here, probably, the second part, and these are deals. it is just for us. this is important, because, well, by and large, ukraine exports, uh, grain or not? we don't care. she is on the defense of ukraine, these currency crimes. minimal impact,

it turns out that it is more important for us that our partners are our friendly countries. yes, friendly countries could receive, e, stable supplies from russia in these markets, to gain a foothold, as long as there are difficulties with this , these difficulties must be overcome, including, using, e, un mechanisms, mechanisms for partnerships with safro-unions with other strange ones in order to consolidate those shaky guarantees in quotation marks, yes, which are now in this russia , but in fact by those countries that have imposed unilateral sanctions. in order to consolidate them already at the institutional level, that is, to build an infrastructure that could not be destroyed. uh, unilateral actions on the part of the united states in the european union and the project in hypocrisy explains everything that is needed by the poorest, and the recipient - these are other main supplies not going to africa but to europe and asia, even in any case

this proposal itself. yes, but it has a positive effect on the market in terms of price. uh, stop growing. somewhere even declined in the market, so naturally africans. first of all, it excites the price point, then we are talking about whether the african ukrainian corn directly gets to them, directly, does it get on the table, so to speak, algerian or non-gerian, but it is important how what are the prices on the stock exchange, but if the part of the transaction that concerns us is carried out, well, let's say , to put it mildly, incompletely, is it true, we generally need it. we nevertheless increased, even food exports in monetary terms last year. now we don’t have customs statistics in the public domain, but we have export game data plus 15% of cash expressions. we are in the twenty-second year in the twenty-first, and here it’s not even a matter of cash receipts, which russia

receives more, yes, than ukraine from the export of grain , food from the fact that this is important for our friends. yes, even africa is 50% of our entire political support. now he's voting, then and hmm they perceive our willingness very positively. er, you understand their concern. they still need this one. almost one and a half billion people who depend on you one way or another from food imports and, of course, for them any fluctuations in the market are so panicky yes, they are sensitive, and we need to build relationships with them on a long-term basis. yes, at the same time, we understand that ukraine earned $7 billion from the grain deal about last year, while receiving $60 billion in financial assistance from the west. that is it. well, it's not some kind of fundamental infusion. in

addition, we all understand that ukraine does not buy weapons. she doesn't buy. there's ammunition and her beard. from these financial injections does not depend, but that is, if we sum up this deal , we need uh, we need this deal in order to uh buy time in order to build our own system of independent uh, a financial infrastructure that would be closed to the ruble to the yuan, others the monetary currencies of the throttling countries e to build out of the e-e transportation insurance market , regardless of western intermediaries. uh, to build a system of grain reservation storage of grain in the territory of importing countries. and this work needs to be done. yes, it takes time, it is very important to create uh, change the information fund around this deal, because uh is being created here, including ukraine ukrainian resources. yes, they

are creating, uh, they are pumping such an agenda that russia was forced to make this deal. e that this is supposedly the defeat of russia, this is another one that she was forced to. open these three ports while our official comments. in general, they are wiser, yes, and there is no such anguish there, that it is necessary to exit the transaction calmly, we are extending participation in it. yes, but we insist that the second part was carried out because , until now, banking insurance services continue to be blocked and providers are often afraid of working with russian banks. despite the fact that there are some loopholes created there, a much more solid structure is needed. this year, it needs to be built, and russia itself will be africa, and then you and him, security, most likely,

will be the main story on this very thing. an african country will raise these issues, that is, you need to uh, create grain storage systems in africa and uh, in including some humanitarian issues to resolve three of this assistance, but the main thing is to expand exports. uh, because i'm africa and russia is interested in this expansion, not only grain. this same fertilizer is still yes, which is necessary for food production. thank you, we were talking with andrey maslov from the higher school of economics . it is clear that an intensive diplomatic process is underway in the coming days, no matter what the outcome, it will not be possible to close the issue intertwining friends of enemies. it is such that black and white solutions will not work. food security is a huge topic ; it occupies an increasingly prominent place on

the world agenda. the ukrainian board is an aggravating circumstance, but not at all the main and not the only one. fear of hunger, perhaps one of the oldest in the history of mankind, which in november last year crossed a new record mark of 8 billion people on the website of the world food program there is an interactive map of hunger, which is in mode real-time analysis of the situation in 90 countries, according to the organization, in less than 5 years the number of undernourished has increased by 2.5 times, another 50 million and 45 countries have been on the verge of starvation since 2012. the british journal of economics annually publishes a global food security index that takes into account four parameters. availability of food. its qualities are safety and stability. last year

, finland, ireland, norway, france and the netherlands were among the top five countries. this means that these countries enough products and at affordable prices in the red zone. the countries of africa to the south were taken, the saharas of burunda, sierra leone, the democratic republic of the congo, madagascar, nigeria, and venezuela, haiti, yemen, syria, and sudan , today 40% of the land surface is used for agriculture, the area on which crops are grown is approximately the size of south america and the area, equal to africa is reserved for pasture in many countries, these resources are exhausted , except for developing countries, but little crop to grow. his. we still need to collect half of it is lost. in developing countries, due to improper collection of storage or transportation, the fear that the planet will not be able to feed all people has not gone away. however, even he admits that

enough food is produced in the world for everyone, the critical situation is not due to a lack of food, but because for the prices for it, including this is due to it is in ukraine and it is not only a matter of failures in the logistics of the price of mineral fertilizers. increased sharply after application sanctions against russia, a major producer in a number of regions, primarily in latin america and europe, had to abandon or reduce the use of phosphates. because of what, yields have decreased by at least 20-30% , the statistics of the last decade show that the food situation in the world is deteriorating against the backdrop of economic inequality. x and horizons of food i will talk with a person who knows everything about it. sergey ivanov runs the fk company - this is one of the largest russian players in the food market. sergey hello. good morning. let's start

the bull by the horns, which means that humanity is in danger of starvation. the issue threatens hunger now 800 million people are starving. this data is about 2 billion malnourished. uh, and in order to answer it, you just need to realize, like what kind of food, uh, we eat an agrarian diet of 300 kg per year, uh, mainly cereals , mainly there, like starchy foods, there is a diet of the modern world - this is already 900 kilograms per year of food. that's 1,500 kilocalories per day 3,500 kilocalories per day. and today, 8 billion are divided roughly in half 4 500 billion kg, and eats 900 kg of a4 food a day a year, that is, it overeats 5 billion of what it is produced, if evenly distributed, it seems like it can be enough for everyone, but this is theoretically and most likely impossible not distributed, of course, and further inside this there are such trends that 2 billion new ones will appear, uh, threatens or does not threaten?

this is the future to try to look into, uh, 2 billion new ones will appear 4 billion, which today is not up to, well , they at least they all have 900 kg, they all want how they eat in the modern western city, and in this case, there he says it is necessary to increase the food supply by one and a half times. and if it's just 900 kg, e.g. , to transfer it by 10 a year, this is simply what humanity is striving for, and everyone will want something twice as much. and now twice as much, of course, this is a call from a call, to find him, well, at the same time. so you say, everyone wants to eat, as in a modern western city in a modern western city they don’t eat very well. how to say correctly is very difficult, maybe we need to take this approach and this is, well, as it were, when we talking about what, uh, what can we influence? that's where the modern diet of an urban person is 3.5 thousand kilocalories, of which 1,000 1,200 empty unnecessary they are not needed, that is, we need two, two and a half, that is, if that's what the importance of a healthy healthy diet is, that is, i help myself with pluses i also release resources into

food, for example, by 25x30%, e. i reduce, well, as it were, if humanity hypothetically could, for example, all of a sudden, take care of everything, take care of your health. we need 25 to 30% less food, it would be necessary. perhaps it. this is a big question, because as a person, the more we are , well, than this is a direct dependence of growth, uh, gdp per country or per person and that's it. there we are the first pleasure - this is food and how from agrarian, as a person moves to the city , he first appears money, he begins to spend a day on food on food on food and such a macro. the trend is now talking a lot about food security, but mostly tied to specific teaching topics. it is clear that these topics, how it affects, but they passing. and here is what influences perspectively, if we look at the future e of the global food market, and these are technologies and

these are approaches to e, consumption style. uh, this is some kind of climate, what is more important here are two things. here are today's challenges that well consensus on all agree with them. these are three words. food availability is lacking. this is the impact on the environment. e traditional technologies. it’s like we ’re ruining the planet and health, too many compromises are already being made to ensure that these 8 billion feed there from pesticides herbicides growth hormones and so on. so this is how it is today, but if you look, try to just look at what big trends are. here determine uh, the future of the food market and look like five. the first is the growth in demand i will find, that is. here, as it were, uh, how to double food or how to increase food by one and a half times. he is like that, how would he uh, pressing uh to work the second is like the effectiveness of new food or, in general, existing food per unit of nature from the point of view

in terms of earth water air need stigmatized these impact on biodiversity and er, contribution to the greenhouse effect, that is, here are 5.5 elements. eh, as if the cost per unit of nature , you can even say so. uh, further uh climate change climate change, uh, and two things are important to be aware of. the first change in the balance of agricultural land. south, burns out the north. eh, they buy. well, in this regard, by the way, the acquirer is global warming. well, sort of like the country is also the second climate refugee. that is, they says 300 million people, uh, hoarding in the 50th year will go away. what will they run from? well , as it were, it is impossible to survive and there is nothing to eat, and they will change the balance of internal, too , the internal balance of food in those countries where they will come. uh, the next factors are health and a healthy diet. well, here she is a healthy diet, which

is concerned just such here is the golden billion or those who are recalled? that is, they are somehow important to them. here's how to learn something to give up sugar to eat less meat. and there are 2.500 return calories. uh, the other world does not understand them, to be honest, those who are to us, well, as it were, to see something in a plate, they do not understand at all. here is this uh these questions are a challenge. but this is, of course, the direction of the most powerful healthy food diet . and the last thing is new technologies. and there 's a boom going on. today, it's going in different directions. eh, it's brand new. well, here's an attempt by scientists to rethink. eh, potential. well, like plants. what is the potential of plants in terms of creating the creation of energy, the creation of the energy of transformation plants that give there proteins fats carbohydrates. and here, and what plants can generally give proteins, fats, carbohydrates. what in general in nature, uh, microorganisms can do this, it turns out that algae can create

the same carbohydrates, it turns out that yeast. that's how we live with enzymes. uh, it's 1,000 years old, it turns out, yeast. well, i’m talking about fermentation technology, it turns out that yeast can also produce proteins and fats. turns out they can give. and now, as if understanding these, and then the microbiome is a huge direction. today. this is probably transferring science, as in general, return to the soil. eh, health without fertilizers, without chemistry, so that the soil reproduces itself and its resource and is as efficient as today's intensive farming. could it be now the modern world a powerful pretending to influence the country that depends? uh, here's someone else's food, roughly speaking, that is, it does not provide for itself. i think that this, well, in today's world, this is just one of the factors in general subjectivity and

independence, a truly pandemic is showed the pandemic. well, here's an interesting example of the arab countries, they don't produce food. they solved their food security. uh, they bought up agricultural land, invested in factories all over the world and read that they would be provided with food. if anything, now, if anything happened, all the borders were closed, and they suddenly realized it wasn’t working. the model doesn't work for us to be, uh, self-sufficient, if the next crisis happens we need technology to help us domestically. uh, to produce this food. eh i don't think that is, this is interesting, by the way, questions regarding our positioning as a country, because today we have this strategy of the ministry of agriculture. even recorded national food security, and we are in terms of . here, as if food should be understood, we are self-sufficient. that is, we will always feed ourselves, there is no need to worry about bad things , we will feed ourselves with the right food, but the truth is we are still dependent. from uh genetics and still

dependent on technology that provides efficiency. eh, well, one by one. uh, the cost of this technique and that's precision farming and and so on, that is, well, these are all solvable questions. that is, there would be a desire science we have, as if there would be an effort of will. uh, so in terms of our positioning. for example, saudi arabia is far from being a country that can call itself some kind of agrarian player there. here in their strategy it is written that we must ensure our own food security. and also to be an important player in the world bese. today everyone realizes that food is an instrument of influence there. well, for us respectively, the same thing, but from the point of view of the future, we can just clog up and say, here we are protecting what we have. and you can try. here is some contribution to the world in the world solution of world problems. uh, make the scientists of our connections. here we are,

for example, how the company discovered russian science for itself. simply the strongest world school of biotech and russian. eh, we are trying to build some interesting tasks with them to solve. eh, and here it is. well, and this positioning, how we get there, not only there, buy our grain, buy our meat, buy our oils. we are so dear united arab emirates we have the technology. how to help you close your progress here is precision fermentation. here are algae that you can grow at home and cover 80-70-80% of your needs for fats proteins, and our technologies. that is, we are there on that from us supplies. that is, it is with us that you are working to improve efficiency. it's like the export of ideas is no longer the export of stones , you as a company in these very specific conditions feel political resistance to work. we have almost half of sales are for export. we

produce and sell more than two million tons of our amazing thing there. we are 5 years ago. they are 4 years old. we have introduced the term "unfriendly countries" in our conversations. about imagine, it turns out, where does this come from, as if we were for ourselves. well, then we said with america well, especially new innovations. we make sweet proteins. this is an alternative, sugar, healthy, protein sweetness, there are sweets without sugar, enriched with probiotics. well, that is , this is such a sweetness of the future. and we are not we we don't understand america well, as if we don't understand western europe well, maybe an interesting market. well, it is also not clear that our markets are africa and southeast asia and india china latin america these are understandable long-term friendly countries for us, and when did it happen, uh, well, a year ago. hey, here's the spread. uh, leaving the market. we are no longer friends. we, well, not significantly there europeans started buying our soy soy

shorts. we are non-gmo. they suddenly got puzzled, there and uh, well, they refused. we found very quickly new markets. china india calmly all freezes. we hardly noticed any problems. well, these are more like logistical finances, as if the finances of the system are loading the calculations, they have become harder, but in general , no. because food is a very rational topic. this is very inspiring , thank you very much. sergei ivanov from the fc company was with us. calories can be consumed in different forms not only in food, but also in drinking, even the horror of alcohol and where asim aleiran passes because of sloboda. it is notorious in the world as a country,

in which active islamic religious extremists in just 20 years, more than 70,000 people died here as a result of terrorist attacks, but few people think that in this islamic country alcohol abuse can go to jail, but here is the paradox here, perhaps one of the most exotic breweries, factories which is almost 150 years old brewery is located in the city of rwalpendi. not far from the country's capital , islamabad. it produces high-quality beer, wine risks and many other types of alcoholic beverages used in the main equipment is from china and europe, part of the machinery is imported from russia , and some machines are stored in this factory as a reminder. modern chinese and european apparatuses, but earlier this enterprise belonged to the british and was under colonial rule.

it was actually the land of slaves, almost everything , from paper to technology , was brought from england during excavations near the factory, and even bricks were found brought from scotland. according to the law, alcohol in pakistan is only allowed to be consumed. for muslims, the observance of order is monitored by a government department that issues a permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages. only for non-muslims, factory -made alcohol can be sold exclusively in certain hotels and specialty stores. and even though sales are under government control is extremely high. i would not say that we have suffered greatly from the taliban , much more problems are caused by corruption, which only grows over the years. although i cannot blame it, a certain political party. i myself am a party member, but corruption has penetrated many areas of life and business, for example, if you need to get permission, most likely you will have to.