during the day, more than 180 shells were fired across the territory of the dpr, two people were injured and had anti-camera moments. the russian ground attack aviation launched another missile strikes on the objects and equipment of the units of the armed forces of ukraine to protect against enemy means after the crew of the su-25 head of the trap, as a result of a sortie

, the camouflaged painful strong positions of the militants of the vehicle were destroyed. the ukrainian orthodox church considers it illegal to demand to leave the kiev-pechersk lavra on the eve of the monk issued an order to leave the monastery, allegedly due to the termination of the lease agreement, as reported on the website of the lavra , it must be done before march 29 , they reacted to the news and the moscow patriarchate called what is happening there the apogee of lawlessness that is happening against millions of ukrainian believers. washington brussels promised to withdraw new sanctions against moscow and prevent third countries from circumventing them, this is stated in a joint statement by the us president and the chairman of the european commission. and joe baida met washington to limit moscow's income intentionally with the help of a price ceiling for russian oil. well, now the footage that

was circulated today by the ministry of defense russian fighters, using high-precision, ranging ammunition, destroyed sourner anti-aircraft missile systems. the combat vehicle was discovered by drones. in the donetsk direction, a special operation from the air was confirmed. and an accurate hit on the targets , i note that abrading ammunition is effectively used to destroy the armored vehicles of the armed forces. turkey prepares for the elections, the opposition has chosen candidates erdoganov's rivals, political passions are heating up grain deal. should we expect an extension, who benefits from the sale of grain, will there be enough food security in the world from the un program to the personal sovereignty of each country, all the details, see after a short advertisement in the international review.

up to 50 percent hello on air international review. my name is fyodor lukyanov today in the international review program. events of the week

chronicle facts comments election campaign in turkey, erdogan found an opponent, but stumbled on the candidacy. will you extend the delivery, does the grain deal make sense, does he promise to feed the hungry? is there enough food for the whole world? what happens to the food materials of our program? veteran investigator seymour hersh, nevertheless, woke up the volcano for a month, his publication that the us administration ordered to blow up the northern streams was diligently ignored, but the question hung uncomfortably in the air and a volley was fired at him from the leading media calibers, it turns out, his favorite brainchild, putin and schroeder, slammed

some ukrainian craftsman not associated with the state on his own initiative. in what a dangerous world we live in almost anyone who wants to rent. as spiegel told us, the yacht andromeda can take and break the strategic communication of pan-european significance, it is completely without protection, what’s next, and then the fireworks of the version of speculation, in which the essence of the issue will simply dissolve plausibly or not. who cares, the more cinematic the version, the better the familiar ones. for those who grew up on modern high-quality series, however, for a talented game loses the line of what is acceptable, the one after which comes an unexpected denouement in the series exhale admiringly. wow, but in life next week

expires, the so-called grain deal agreement with the participation of russia, ukraine, the un and turkey and the withdrawal of agricultural products from the conflict zone to world markets. by the beginning of march of this year , about 23 million tons of grain and half of the cargo had been taken out of ukrainian posts. a quarter fell on corn on wheat. and although initially the deal was considered as a program for the supply of grain to the poorest countries of the world and its products were received not at all by those who most of all needed it ; only in sixth place was egypt, which received less than a million tons of grain. along with this, there was a starvation with a population of 170 million people from the grain deal received less than

ten millionth israel germany imported more grain than kinia, and france got more agricultural products than in europe needy sub- sugar countries got only 3% of all supplies. grain from ukraine was exported to the european union even before the istanbul agreements, the influx of cheap ukrainian grain stabilized prices and provided the eu with a record import over the past 20 years from the other side. he created problems for local farmers. especially in poland, romania, bulgaria, hungary, the czech republic and slovakia, if earlier poland received no more than 6,000 tons of ukrainian corn, then last year more than one and a half million tons, and imports of ukrainian sunflower seeds to bulgaria increased 25 times in most cases, the introduction of these products further unsustainable grain settled on local markets and caused a sharp decline in prices, which, against the backdrop of rising fuel and fertilizer prices

, hit local producers as a result of the countries of eastern europe demanded to pay compensation and shut down route and deliveries from ukraine in addition, due to ukrainian dumping on caryopsis. kuruzy and sunflower oil, the share of exports of these goods from russia has decreased and although he states that the agreement allowed the return of grain to the global markets and lowered the prices of basic foodstuffs , nothing came of this deal in most starving countries. the grain agreements initially provoked contradictory reactions. and it’s not even a matter of what proportion of hypocrisy is in them and what exactly russia receives or does not receive. the question, in principle, is an irreconcilable military confrontation in which all those involved see existential elements for themselves. and suddenly those same irreconcilables

make a deal of a commercial nature for filling the market are traded with opponents, but more acceptable conditions for themselves, but in essence. and for him, this is like the same question. you can ask about the supply of hydrocarbons, coal, metals in general, russian resources, which regularly enter the world market, including countries on the other side of the front line, not to mention the pipelines pumping russian raw materials to the west actually through war zone with the same west. by the standards of the total wars of the 20th century is nonsense, but in another century the conflict is played out in conditions of interconnectedness. it is in itself a weapon and a method of mutual deterrence, but as in the case of nuclear deterrence, the threat of use is more effective than its execution - a sharp break in economic ties between russia and the eu.

last year, he was supposed to inflict a knockout blow first on russia from europe, then , on the contrary, as energy cooperation collapsed, knockouts did not happen in either case, the parties bear the costs, but adapt to the new conjuncture. in the case of grain negotiations, there is the political aspects, which perhaps outweigh the commercial or military ones, the components do not. they are russia's relations with countries that are just friendly, let's talk about this with our good acquaintance. of course, there andrei maslov, we found him in odessa baby andrey hello, what most of all does not suit russia with the deal is the deal. it itself consists of two parts. there are security guarantees that russia provided for the export of food from three ukrainian ports. and there is the assistance that he, uh, undertook to provide russia in order to

our exports were not vulnerable to unilateral sanctions. and here, probably, the second part, and these are deals. it is precisely for us that it is fundamental, because, well, by and large, ukraine exports, uh, grain or not? we don't care. it is on the defense of ukraine that these foreign exchange earnings have a minimal impact, it turns out that dana is more difficult for our partners, our friendly countries. yes , friendly countries could receive, uh, stable supplies from russia. in these markets , gain a foothold, while uh, there are difficulties with this. these difficulties must be overcome, including, using, uh, the mechanisms of the un, the mechanisms of partnership with the safro-union with other strange ones in order to consolidate those shaky guarantees in quotation marks, yes, which are now in this russia , uh, in fact, those strange ones that are

one-sided sanctions were introduced. in order to consolidate them already at the institutional level, that is, to build an infrastructure that could not be destroyed. uh, unilateral actions on the part of the united states and the european union . these are other main deliveries not going to africa , but to europe and asia, even in any case, this proposal itself. yes, but it has a positive effect on the market in terms of price. uh, stop growing. somewhere even declined in the market, so naturally africans. first of all, this is worrying about a new moment, that is, it is not about whether the african ukrainian corn directly gets to them, directly, whether it falls on the chair of an algerian or a nigerian is important as what are

the prices on the stock exchange, but if part of the transaction that as far as we are concerned, it is being fulfilled, well, let's say, to put it mildly , incompletely, is it, we need it at all. we nevertheless increased, even food exports in monetary terms last year. now we do not have customs statistics in the public domain, but we have export game data plus 15% in monetary terms. we are in the twenty-second year in the twenty-first, and here it’s not even a matter of cash receipts , which russia receives more than ukraine from the export of food grains from the fact that this is important for our friends. yes, even africa is 50% of our entire political support. now he's voting, then and hmm they perceive our willingness very positively. uh, accept their concerns. they still need this one. almost one and a half billion people who depend in one way or another on food imports and, of course

, any fluctuations in the market are such panic for them . yes, they are sensitive, and we need to build relationships with them on a long-term basis. yes, at the same time, we understand that ukraine earned 7 billion from the grain deal dollars about last year at the same time, having received 60 billion financial assistance from the west. that is it. well, it's not some kind of fundamental infusion. in addition, we all understand that ukraine does not buy weapons. she doesn't buy. there, its ability to return ammunition does not depend on these financial injections, but that is, if we sum up this deal, we need uh , we need this deal in order to uh buy time in order to build our own system of independent financial infrastructure, which would be closed on the ruble on the yuan, other monetary currencies friendly countries to build out of

the transportation insurance market, regardless of western intermediaries. uh, build grain reservation systems for grain storage on the territory of importing countries. and this work needs to be done. yes, this takes time. it is very important to create, to change the informational background around this transaction, because it is being created here, including ukraine, ukrainian resources. yes, they are creating, uh, they are pumping such an agenda that russia was forced to make this deal. uh, what is it, they say, the defeat of russia, this is another one that she was forced. open these three ports while our official comments. in general, they are wiser, yes, and there is no such anguish there, that it is necessary to exit the transaction calmly, we are extending participation in it.

uh, but at the same time, we insist that the second part be carried out, because they still continue to block and, uh, banking insurance services and providers are often afraid of working with russian banks, despite the fact that there are some loopholes have been created, but a much stronger structure is needed. here in this year, it needs to be built and russia itself will be africa and food security, most likely it will be the main story on this itself, these african countries will raise these issues, that is, it is necessary, uh, to create grain storage systems in africa and uh, including what to solve humanitarian issues with this help. but the main thing is to expand exports, that both africa and russia are interested in this expansion. not only grain. this same fertilizer is still yes, which is necessary for food production. thank you, we talked with andrey maslo from the higher school of economics the grain deal is an example of

how complex and non-linear the modern world is, whether it will be extended or not. it is clear that an intensive diplomatic process is underway in the coming days, no matter what the outcome , it will not be possible to close the issue by intertwining friends of enemies. it is such that black and white solutions will not work. food security is a huge topic, it occupies an increasingly prominent place on the world agenda ukrainian board aggravating circumstances, but not at all the main thing and the only one. the fear of hunger is perhaps one of the most ancient in the history of mankind, which in november last year crossed a new record mark of 8 billion people on the website of the world food program there is an interactive map of hunger, which analyzes the situation in 90 countries in real time than in 5 years the number of undernourished has increased by

2.5 times with another 50 million and 45 countries on the verge of starvation since 2012. the british journal of economics publishes annually a global food security index takes into account four parameters. availability of food. its qualities are safety and stability. last year , the top five countries included finland, ireland, norway , france and the netherlands. this means that these countries have enough products and at affordable prices in the red zone. the countries of africa turned out to be to the south, the sugars of burundi, sierra leone, the democratic republic of the congo, madagascar , nigeria, and venezuela, haiti, yemen, syria, and sudan, already today 40% of the land surface is used for agriculture, an area on which crops are grown is approximately the size of south america and an area equal to africa is allocated for

pasture in many countries these resources are wasted. to give exceptions are perhaps developing countries, but it is not enough to grow a crop. his. we still need to collect half of it is lost. in developing countries, due to improper collection of storage or transportation, the fear that the planet will not be able to feed all people has not gone away. however , even he admits that the product in the world is produced enough for everyone. the situation is developing not because of the lack of food, but because of the price of it , including this is due to somehow in ukraine and it’s not just about logistics failures, the prices for mineral fertilizers have increased sharply after the application of sanctions against russia of their major producer in a number of regions, especially in latin america and europe , the use of phosphates had to be phased out or reduced. because of what, the yield decreased by at least 20-30%. the statistics of the last

decade show that the food situation in the world is deteriorating against the backdrop of economic inequality. the big trends and horizons of food are spoken by a person who knows everything about it. sergey ivanov runs the fk company - this is one of the largest russian players in the food market. hello sergei. good morning. let's start the bull by the horns, which means that humanity is in danger of starvation. the issue threatens hunger now 800 million people are starving. this is the un data 2 billion are malnourished. uh , and in order to answer it we just need to realize. like like what kind of food? uh, we eat agrarian diet 300 kg per year uh the predominantly cereals are predominantly there, as the starchy ones are the diet of the modern world. this is already 900 kilograms per year of food. that's 1,500 kilocalories per day 3,500 kilocalories per day.

and today, 8 billion are divided approximately in half 4 billion 500 kg, and they eat 900 kg of a4 food a day a year, that is, periods of 5 billion, then it is produced if evenly distributed, it seems, how it can be enough for everyone, but this is theoretical and most likely, it is impossible evenly, but the distribution is not distributed, of course, further inside there are such trends that 2 billion new ones will appear, uh, it threatens. this is the future to try to look into 2 billion. new 4 billion will appear, which today is not everything, 900 kg. they all want the way they eat in a modern western city, and in this case, he says there it is necessary to increase food by one and a half times. and if it's just 900 kg, e.g. , to transfer it by 10 a year, this is simply what humanity is striving for, and everyone will want something twice as much. and that's twice as much, of course, this is a call from a call, to on to find him, well, at the same time. so you say, everyone wants to eat, as in a modern western city in a modern western city they don’t eat very well. how

to say right? very wrong. so maybe we need to take this approach and this is, well, like, when we talk about what, uh, what can we influence? that's where the modern diet of an urban person is 3.5 thousand kilocalories, of which 1,000 1,200 empty ones are not needed. we don’t need them, that is , we need two, two and a half, that is, if that’s what is important, a healthy healthy diet, that is, i help myself and pluses. i still free up resources for food, for example, by 25x30%, i reduce, well, as if, if humanity hypothetically could, for example , all of a sudden, take care of everything, take care of your health. we need 25 to 30% less food, we should. perhaps it. this is a big question, because as a person, the more we are , well, than here, this is a direct dependence of the growth of e gdp on the side there per person and that's it. there we are the first pleasure - this is food and how from agrarian, how like a person moves to the city he first day the money appears, he

begins to spend it for a day for food for food for food and such a macro. the trend is now talking a lot about food security, but mostly tied to very specific topics. it is clear that these topics are somehow affected, but they are passing. and here is what influences perspectively, if we look at the future e of the global food market, and these are technologies and these are approaches to e, consumption style. uh, this is some kind of climate, what is more important here are two things. here are today's challenges that consensus on everything agree with them. these are three words. food availability is lacking. this is the impact on the environment. e traditional technologies. we are kind of rough on the planet and too many compromises are already being made to feed these 8 billion there from pesticides, herbicides, growth hormones and so on. so this is how it is today, but if you look, try to just

look at what big trends are. here determine uh, the future of the food market and look like five. the first is the growth in demand will find. that is, here, as it were, how to double food or how to increase food by one and a half times, and it’s kind of like it’s overwhelming, but the second one works - it ’s like the effectiveness of new food or in general, the existing smoke per unit of nature from the point of view of land water air the need for these stigma uh, impact on biodiversity and, er, contribution to the greenhouse effect, that is, here are 5 5 elements. eh, as if the cost per unit of nature, even already, probably, you can say so. uh, next uh, climate change climate change is two things that are important to be aware of. first balance change agricultural lands. south, burns out the north. eh, they buy. well, in this regard, by the way, the acquirer is global warming. well, sort of like the country is also

the second climate refugee. that is, he says 300 million people will save up in the tenth year. from what they will run and run. well, as it were, it is impossible to survive and there is nothing to eat, and they will change the balance of the internal , too, the internal balance was food in those countries where they will come. uh, the following factors are health and healthy diet. but here she is a healthy diet, which is concerned with just such a golden billion or those who are on vacation? that is, they are somehow important to them. here's how to learn something to give up sugar to eat less meat. and there 2,500 calories to return, another world does not understand them, to be honest, those who are us. well, as if, that they would see something in a plate, they don’t understand at all. here is this here this uh these questions and challenge. but this is, of course, the direction of the most powerful healthy food diet . and the last thing is new technologies. and there 's a boom going on

directions. eh, it's brand new. well, here's an attempt by scientists to rethink. eh, potential. well, like plants. what is the potential of plants in terms of creating the creation of energy, the creation of the energy of the transformation of the plant, which give there proteins, fats , carbohydrates. and here, and what plants can generally give proteins, fats, carbohydrates. what in general in nature, er, microorganisms can do this, it turns out that algae can create proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and it turns out that yeast. that's how we live with enzymes. uh, it's 1,000 years old turns out it's yeast. well, i’m talking about fermentation technology, it turns out that yeast can also produce proteins and fats. turns out they can give. and now, as if understanding these, and then the microbiome is a huge direction. today. this is probably conveying the science of how in general, e to return to the soil. uh, health without fertilizers, without chemistry, so that the soil reproduces its own resources and is as effective in terms of efficiency as today's

intensive farming. could there be a powerful claim to modern world now? influence the country that depends? uh, here's someone else's food, roughly speaking, that is, it does not provide for itself. i think that this, well, in today's world is just the same, one of the factors in general subjectivity and independence is truly a pandemic, this was shown by the pandemic. well, here is an interesting example of the arab countries. uh, they don't produce food. they solved their food security. uh, they bought up agricultural land, invested in factories all over the world and read that they would be provided with food. if so, here, if so happened all the borders were closed and they suddenly realized it wasn't working. the model doesn't work for us to be, uh, self-sufficient, if the next crisis happens we need technology to help us domestically. uh, to produce this food.

i don’t think that, by the way, these are interesting questions regarding our positioning as a country, because today we have a strategy for the ministry of agriculture, even national food security is written down, and we are from the point of view. here, as if food should be understood, we are self-sufficient. that is, we ourselves are always we will feed, we don’t need to worry about bad , we will feed ourselves with the right food, but the truth is we are still dependent. from uh genetics and still dependent on technology that provides efficiency. uh, well, per unit, uh, the cost of this equipment and high-precision agriculture and so on, that is, well, these are all solvable issues. that is, there would be a desire science we have, as if there would be an effort of will. and so in terms of our positioning. for example, saudi arabia is far from being a country that can call itself there some kind of agricultural player. here in their strategy it is written that we must ensure

our own food security. and also be an important player in the world run. today everyone realizes that food is an instrument of influence there. well, for us, respectively, the same thing, but from the point of view of the future, we can just clog up and say, here we are protecting what we have. and you can try to make some contribution to the world in the world solution of world problems. uh, make our scientists connect with us. here we are for example, how the company discovered russian science for itself. simply the strongest world school of russian biotech, er, and we are trying to build some interesting tasks with them to solve. uh. and this is it. well, and this positioning, as we come there, not only there, buy our grain, buy our meat, buy our oils. we say so we here uh, dear united arab emirates we have the technology. how to help you close your progress here is a certain fermentation for you. here are the algae that you can grow yourself and 80-70-80% of the need for fat

close your squirrels, but our technologies. that is, we are there on that from us supplies. that is , it is with us that you are working to improve efficiency. it's like the export of ideas is no longer the export of stones, you as a company in these very specific women's conditions feel political resistance to work. we have almost half of our sales for export. we produce and sell more than two million tons of our amazing port there . we are 5 years ago. they are 4 years old. we have introduced the term "unfriendly countries" in our conversations. oh imagine here it turns out it's like we are for ourselves. well, then we said with america well, especially new innovations. we make sweet proteins. this is an alternative, sugar, healthy, protein sweetness, sugar-free sweets there, enriched with probiotics. well, that is, this is such a sweetness of the future, and we do not, we do not understand america