today is a storehouse of wisdom , humanity, philosophical thinking, an explanation of the laws of life, answers to all questions. life and death burned everything that makes a person a person, and 189 years ago, in 1834, the great german writer heinrich geim said that where books are burned at the end, people are burned. we saw it in the middle of the last century, and we saw it on may 2 , 2014 in odessa everything was confirmed. and if we have echoes of this, of course, look at the theater director iosif reichelgauz. here

he is giving an interview, someone attributed the phrase to me about the people burned in the odessa house of trade unions, which no one can confirm with a link. this is an absolute lie and absolutely about the sky has become cleaner - this is complete nonsense, no oppositionists. i have never been. i love my motherland very much, i was brought up in russian culture and devoted my whole life to the development of russian theatrical culture from all the phrases, including the fact that after the second of may the air in odessa became cleaner, i can’t say that he said this, but i can't help but believe why? if he hadn't said, they will bring you your children in coffins. and i will rejoice, yes,

okay, he said that she was confused. it is also not true to insist on anything. well, here are the facts that make it possible to doubt everything that mr. arkhelgauz says. here is what he says about the participation of the deputy of the rada goncharenko in the events of may 2 in odessa, all stories and tales of notion about odessa, including all the now formed tale. about the house of trade unions is a lie, absolutely a lie, we came up with the idea that a certain conference attendant was photographing someone. bullshit. now that's a lie. here is the document here is alexey goncharenko inside the burnt house, the union is photographed in the background. the dead, and

here he is reporting from the scene in odessa . this is the entrance to the building of the pomatraunion unions, and in the odessa region, i’m translating with a private camera, this is the remnants of the separatist camp burning. i don’t know if you saw them near kulikov on kulikovo field, and even, you know, many people justify the departure of their colleagues by the fact that, uh, they are leaving because of a special operation, that, uh, they are tormented by the fact that people are dying. uh, that they are against the war, they are pacifists, that we are aggressors and they cannot come to terms with this precisely with this justify their actions. and, if you do not agree, they never loved those who loved them. they never treated where they lived as their own, as their own, and this is the clearest confirmation of this. in my opinion.

these are fragments of an interview with the actress, so that he is khamatova, who she gave the journalist mikhail to write for igor, here, listen to putin who smiles and just does it, and the look from top to bottom is just like that. i think, and that everything is just what's the difference, i think, but at this moment, as if you know, as if some kind of genetic memory, but grandparents who passed, but through stalin's time. it is somehow all the same along the spine like lightning. it runs through and until now these photos mean me and lenin, she and putin, you want to somehow somehow overcome

everyone. uh, these are the people that i somehow convince or destroy those fucking people. russian federation , vladimir putin has never remained indifferent to all the requests of the fund. give life and doctors whom the foundation supports all the promises made by vladimir putin to the foundation

gave life has always been fulfilled, so i will vote for him from this interview. personally, i can conclude. that she lived with such hatred all her life. and as soon as the opportunity arose. and i drank below, but you don’t have to blame the artists of the creators for everything. for example, we also have deputies who use artistic images in order to express their attitude to this or that. for example, a member of the communist party samara deputy mikhail abdalkin. you see, he is listening to the president's address to the federal assembly, and he has noodles on his ears. i think, that a sophisticated viewer will understand the ironic meaning of this performance. it's a pity that the fearlessness

of the communists vanishes in solitude in front of the tv. in general, i would suggest sending deputy abdalkin to the front line with this noodles on his ears, so that he would retell in his own words to fellow soldiers what he heard from the president. and in my opinion. take it all together. this is without grammar. stupidity. this is vulgarity. this is not love. this is not a result. are you special operations or something else? it is much deeper, more laid down. in those years when the reforms of our education began, everything comes from there back in 1826 alexander sergeevich pushkin answering the question of emperor nikolai pavlovich why would he start the reforms?

he said that he would start them with education, because souls that are not strong will follow any driver, but what reforms did pushkin have in mind, pushkin is certainly not the same as we received in the nineties, education in the time of pushkin and then many, many decades up to the nineties. it went side by side with what is called the upbringing, the upbringing of the individual, the upbringing of the individual. why not just a person and not just a person, but a person and a person who must live in a certain society. i want to show you one amazing experiment i personally, which amazed me was made in 1971. which

you take for yourself and spend it as you like, if on the right target, then this counter will throw a ruble here, and this money will go to general cool things. now i'm leaving and the bell will ring. the benefit of the call will light up the scoreboard on the left target and on the right target and you will see. how many guys from your class shot to the left and how many guys from your class fired to the right, in fact, we are in charge of this scoreboard, and not at all the guys who passed in front of him and we make it so that on the left target, or even targets that light up 16 or 17 lights for themselves, and on the right two or three so every student in your class is in a conflict situation. his guys, his class, his comrades, supposedly, they all shoot at the left, the target. these are

16-17 guys. they did their part. i will leave now and after the signal you will work well.

i want to congratulate you, despite our experimental tricks. your class passed the test and most of the guys turned out to be collectivist, therefore, we can probably rejoice for the younger teenagers, because in conditions when they are given a special setting to do against the team, 80% pass the test and step over our installation. well, of course, it's fear. uh, this is the soviet system, fear of being punished and so on and so forth. no, this is not true, because he sees that everyone has done it. so it will completely dissolve. in the mass

who made such a decision, but he takes it completely opposite and so did the majority, well, somehow explain , that is, he acts contrary to the majority, he prefers to remain in the minority, but do as the salt tells him, and only then it turns out that everyone did so no question. now, if today we set up such an experiment, what would be the result? well, what do you think? what do you think is absolutely correct? quite the opposite, why watch? yes, i'm a rich pop star,

my favorite followers are everything for you, who subscribe to those you subscribe to. i myself will receive my car. well, or money brought up, we talked about it. remember ivan didenko in our society for 30 years. since the nineties, the ideology of the superiority of the personal over the collective has been implanted for 30 years. in our cultural space, heroes were created, films were shown, people were nurtured in every possible way, the confidence that each of them is a unique snowflake, that he is more important than a team, that he must do everything for himself. just do not think that this is a trend towards collectivism. she killed. ah, the personality of a person. unlike , say, those, uh, today's uh, snowflakes, we

talked about it. remember people asked in a line from the diary of elena mukhina this is written, and in the summer of 1941. he listen yesterday i bought two literature for the ninth grade and saw. what vast program decided to start reading? now it has begun. turgenev , i have it. now i am reading rudin , there is no extract from there, nothing is more painful than the consciousness of the stupidity that has just been done. after all , this is also a kind of calculation put on yourself a man mask of indifference and leni avos they say, someone will think that a man has ruined how many talents in himself, but to look more closely and there are no talents in him. deny everything and you can easily wake up behind.

now fast forward from 1941. in 1896, this is what he writes? in the diary of a schoolgirl olga dolgova i am writing this diary not so that anyone can read it, but so that when i grow up i can know what a fourteen-year-old out of the row thinks and does, out, a girl coming out and then find out how true judged. i then about similar subjects as, for example, the nature of some people good and evil mutual relations and so on. now they will tell me new ones. remember the tsarskoye selo institute in resin no. here. listen to how the children who first got to mcdonald's in the nineties are talking, listen

people good sellers do not swear, do not shout. thank you please don't kind all smiles it's nice to just walk around not even to buy. well, just look good. that's before, when i was little. i think that they're all like that, and i just think that i'm launching a nuclear missile, in fact, i'm not. here they are not so belligerent, and on the contrary, they did it and it was good that they discovered it. here in the soviet union, his restaurant is such that even they say, look how they say, and now compare with what and how they say today, listen. and i think that people who somehow left some kind of creative mark. in history. they did not aim precisely at leaving a trace, they did, and somehow they managed to leave

track. that is, and i think everyone has a chance to make this trace. in general, i think that a person does not need a school to be educated online and guitar, but to complete the task, what was the surname of peter rurikovich, who wrote the surname dzhugashvili stalin eh? oh, stalin listen, well, i may not know this. it's okay. this does not prevent me from living and earning money, which nato has now formed with ukraine, would have happened in the seventy -first year, and those children we talked about would have been of advanced age. do you think they would throw expensive cars to the border with georgia or kazakhstan, so that later on a scooter somehow, if only to cross the border and escape from the war. where do you think it all

came from? how did it happen? let me remind you, here is the education program, 23. here is the section on the death of formats and therefore the plan should die in 2025 with a diploma of graduation from an educational institution, that is, a dream come true, mr. gref destruction. and citation standards author's textbook, and by 2035 will have to die, general education. school. research university text book article as the dominant form of knowledge

communication. that is, the gigantic centuries-old culture of book publishing, the culture of the book. now i ’m not even talking about supporting pushkin’s house there or tolstoy , it’s not about that now, in general, the culture of reading a book in itself. everything rests on the screens in the mouse. there are no depersonalized lifeless. words of the printed word who are behind this program a major businessmanship of medicine children's goods progressive universities ngos reformers conscious parents, regulators of education as a tool of foreign policy.

it is too. organized religions regulators internal politics academic elite teaching staff parents gassers but this is done very subtly subtly very subtly. you may not even notice how it's done, but i 'll give you an example. here, see the task from the modules. platforms, sberclass schoolchildren are invited to put punctuation marks in a sentence not all people strive for continuous communication for many , loneliness is a great value, because alone with yourself you can be real and not try to match something with the correct mouse expectations. it's right to be yourself.

and how can you become yourself, so that you don’t get bored with yourself, if you don’t communicate with teachers without parents before that, in general, the court with people is different people. how can you be enough for yourself if you don't have the experience? and this is exactly the same, the same message, the same loneliness that you get used to with computers. i am not against the computer. i don't want him to become a killer for the people who, as a result, will deprived of immunity in communication before any problem to be alone one on one, because they have no experience in communication, understanding of education

, and so on . in connection with its 200th anniversary. here's what else then. ushinsky said listen. it seems to me that the prosperity of russia is consequential and the happiness of its monarch lies not in the imitation of the western transformation, but in the independent development of the state folk organism, arising from the consciousness really popular needs, and not from a childish desire to keep up with the west, amazing words. said more than 100 years ago, today at the opening of this monument , the permanent representative of the president in the central federal district. igor shchegolev. he says the following, if

you look closely, there is nothing from his creative and scientific heritage that would not be applicable today. that is why he is valuable to us, he talked a lot about the importance of appreciating national traditions, you need to look carefully. then what has been developed for centuries people and it is not at all necessary to pursue foreign models, because they can be as brilliant as they like in their regions, but on our soils they do not always give the gatherings we need. i want to understand, we are opening a monument to the wonderful great teacher and educator ushinsky, because today marks 200 years of birth. or because we believe and hear his words and believe in the justice of these words. why do i have such doubts? they cannot fail to arise. here, listen to what he says, uh, lawyers public figure anna barrier.

i would like to note that the security strategy has already said that the quote , the implementation of reforms in the field of education without taking into account the historical traditions undermines the foundations of statehood, and this is how the reforms related to the digital transformation of all levels of the school, imposed on us by international structures, should be assessed. in connection with the digitalization system, there is a direct reformatting of the consciousness of our children. but with what settings is a very interesting question. now i would like to devote a couple of minutes, just to these very conversations about important, which raises more and more questions in terms of goals. first, we believe that this is a fundamentally wrong format. why because in an hour children cannot be taught love for the motherland , it is necessary to introduce it into subject education, but it is precisely the teaching of moral values ​​and love for the motherland that must be formed through the russian language, literature through history, even a math assignment. it can be formulated in such a way that

the child will love his homeland. but, and the second point is what we see already. the repeated inclusion of destructive information in these lessons in november was lesson we are different, we are together a lot, where in russia it means that it was timed to coincide with the day of tolerance , we saw that this was expressed in the coloring of lgbt flags and the like. see what unesco is promoting if we focus on their very tolerance. together with the standard sex education in europe, they have prepared an absolutely pedophilic character, which offer children from the age of 4 to learn about the relationship between representatives of the same pool and different concepts of the family. here is 2023, declared the year of the teacher and mentor, and here i am i want to understand, and how realistic it is to teach today, how formal they really are, and this profession is respected by the students of the state and local

authorities. we talked about this too. remember such a soviet teacher, children who didn’t understand, so so, if the second time they don’t understand after school, stay, they gathered us all kinds of meetings and they said to ban teachers and additional tasks teachers broke, how it’s not possible only on the one hand they gave him a small salary and more such programs, uh, that make it impossible for the teacher. uh, himself even find the logical in the content. there goes. it's just that the elephant of the brain drills through the brains and the baby comes. he still wants him to have an age-related need in the first grade, of course, everything decreases, and then and then he starts to reanimate this is his motivation, but in the fifth sixth grade. he simply states that he doesn't want to study with everyone in his class. he begins to be rude, rude and take revenge. that's where the a's come from in american schools. and now we have such revenge on the teachers, they take revenge

for their here is this childish pain, when they want to understand and cannot, and the teacher does not explain the position that the teacher should be expelled from school, replace him with a screen, and this is exactly our today's position, this position of our bosses. that's how it is so no movement is impossible salary grid. a radical increase in the salaries of teachers is proposed, which means that i proceed from the figures 60 of the population 80 is average, the city, because in moscow the average salary is 117. that is, read 120 the teacher of the population should be on top respected citizen. this is important for russian teachers. it's like no. this is a cementing value, yes, radically. yes, unexpectedly, but it seems to me that it makes sense to think about it. i want to be understood correctly, i understand that a lot is being done. and i also understand that a snap of a finger will not change a system that has evolved over decades. i

also understand that a huge number of teachers who teach children today, they already studied according to soros textbooks, it is difficult for them to reorganize themselves. i understand it all. i i feel all this, i understand the meaning of this introduced lesson of talking about important things, but at the same time, turn again to pushkin’s words : education reform is the most important thing, because, uh, a fragile soul will follow any driver. and pushkin's driver was arina rodionovna. why am i saying this, i have already repeated this more than once. i am absolutely convinced that this is the very work that was being carried out now, er, in important conversations in the lessons, it should begin. while the child is lying across the bed. it must start from the earliest

childhood. through fairy tales through epics through stories about what kind of country a person lives in. cleverly talented, right , interestingly fascinating, this is important, because you are alone, when you already went to bed, as he said, mom along the bed is already too late already he grabbed another from other sources and remake a person. very hard. that's why we're talking about it. that's why we care? well, finish? i want a small video in today's program. eh i would say cautionary about that. what we would like to see and whatever i would not like, so that we become look and you will understand. why is our show called that? alternative

mathematics look at this example. how much is 2 + 2 you wrote 22, but when we add numbers, we don't just put the numbers next to each other this stupid. fine. let 's look at it like this, i'm holding two markers in one hand, and then i add two more markers to them in the second hand. how many markers turned out 22 no, you are not four of them. tuesday