everything was destroyed. they. well, he didn't have to say that back then. look, we have 11 million wrestlers. the cause of the working class stood in the center of europe, so truman had another problem. i want to remind you that this is not by the way stood. she did not stand, but remind me when our ambassador was called and they said a group from iran remove this, we removed it in 2 days. so it was out of our scope. and then he came in to respond to nuclear weapons. and this is not just part of our scope. it was in our area. how many more decade in our perimeter? read, you know , the perimeter of the early ones entered, when then then 40 in the second half entered the group itself. how old is the grouping to be there? that is, without entering the perimeter, our group stood there, but in general, during the second world war, so were women. they must have told us that they put pressure on us, they put

an ultimatum, they deceived us , they put the same pressure on us in korea, why did it split? well, the russian and sorry soviet contingent and the american already had a nuance. we had nuclear weapons. but at that moment we didn’t have time for this in 1948. we did not have an agreement yet, we agreed on the division. this is generally a different story, when there, when it was hard on us, and believes that iran was not in our zone of influence , if available. at the very grouping of the second world war did not apply. there it was necessary to contain some influence here as well. and this is not a zone of our influence then. well, how they affect the american forward knows that it did not affect containment. in the fiftieth year did not enter. taiwan they are ready. what are you all on

measure america, we are talking about us, you offer me. there is no reason for me to talk about us, if i was told here that it was necessary that it did not enter into the zone of our influence. it is, but stalin thought differently. what a misfortune, but stalin did not know that this was not part of his zone of influence. if only he were surprised, he imagines ayran is not included in the zone of the main agreement . the main thing is that he wanted to keep. this is eastern europe, listen, well, it's easy to speak for stalin, but stalin thought differently. he didn't know what was for him. the main agreement was eastern europe on the famous napkins. there, not only western europe was eastern europe was delineated.

we are accustomed to watching videos we install we open we watch russian channels and all series movies and cartoons eastern europe for stalin was the most painful place and the most important place that is why he entered the cold war logic. it was of no interest to us at all. well, our troops were standing there, but this is not our area of ​​influence. well, what about our troops in manchuria at that time were standing and that was also not a zone of our influence in the fifty -sixth year, they calmly withdrew already dead, the chinese people were a republic and we recall that the base was closed from finland, in short, i decided to fuss is also not a zone of our influence will come and the moscow region was surprised. if

where our troops stand they stood. the right question is a big mistake not in paris , i still have big claims that we got out of there a very big mistake, because i had advisers wasis, for which are so apolitically argued, of course, in the fourteenth year. let's give this one to me without this, let's not scatter political influence twice . correctly, it's not necessary and leave the third time, fuck it. berlin is also big questions. at all. this is the way to leave. not much comes from there. therefore, this is the problem that we are now facing is the problem of the struggle for attrition, it certainly, so to speak , is also worth it for the united states. and if now is the time, in my opinion it still plays in our favor, because for the united states, for

the current american establishment , china is the main adversary, but we cannot drag it out here either, that is, the operation that is now underway in ukraine a. in what ways are they their enemy? yes, because they will form a new world order, united by what they are now uniting eurasia , china is uniting. you know how unpleasant it is in communicating with state arabia. listen, if for russia iran did not have a zone of influence, with what joy and europe the zone affects the troops and spit? why is china saving such deep interpenetration? what is the main thing for them now? why, if china was the main problem for them, they could fight uniting eurasia in europe wow, who did he unite in europestan, this is pakistan, this is about chinese comrades, relations are being established with iran.

these are the saudis and iranians in beijing signing their romantic relationship to update nothing came to moscow. so far , not even those close to me will remind you that pakistan was america's main ally in this region for many years for many years, and yet, and nevertheless, the united states missed it by russia's swindle china is now farming. yes, nothing china does not form form spreads already various economic world. and now some kind of eurasian space is being thought out. so china's thought from the word is quite simply quite so there is no reality in the phrase that america's confrontation with china is aimed at deceiving us. this is directed only for one, to put us to sleep, to think that they will lag behind us during the first we will not be left

behind, on the contrary, the rhetoric that was just being said when it was aimed at one simple thing in order to mobilize the american society now in order to consolidate the american elite to fight against us. why quickly decide with us? because if the russian problem is solved and the problem exists , it is impossible to consolidate american society. no one had such a task in any war that america waged abroad once, how is it not at all, because american society is not about it at all don't give a damn about foreign wars, american society is always to itself. i don't mean american political cast. and so it is so consolidated for war with us that it is not even necessary to transfer american society, too, it is necessary to rebuild when roosevelt framed the fleet for what in order to put an end to isolationism, both elite and us in general which of the roosevelts did you have in mind franklin frandelan? well, we are talking about such a depth of historical nevech nothing to do with the fact that the tasks

those put then do not exist, and now they said, well, because in any doctrinal districts it is relatively completely different there too, i see. well, look at if you are talking about history from the eighteenth year. this is a war with russia or with china since the eighteenth year. the red threat has been and will not be any war with china for america, in fact, they do not play a role. the only thing that is important to them is to keep china from taking our side, obviously they are an existential threat to america ever. not china but the union of russia and germany what are they, by the way, how direct? 'cause what 's the word, boy? well, listen, let's now spend all the time on this discussion not to spit on the scholz. i say what they say? americans americans, as you know, the chicago school formulated this idea and it sounds very simple. the only existential threat to the existence of america is the union

of german industrial power with the resource and market of russia. like it or not, according to the strategic doctrines of the united states, here are the last two it is china that singles out the administrations, then russia, the deception should not be read that they allegedly have doctrine. this is absolute nonsense. every time. you consider this document. you understand what the mad men wrote, you need to count what the tanks write, which american politicians really use, they are some kind of nonsense that they don’t give out to the outside world under the guise of their strategy. they never followed their strategy even once. i think that it is unlikely that in the near future western citizens will understand what is happening to them to change their attitude will be able to influence the political processes in their countries for several reasons, firstly, because there are no tools and mechanisms for this all the media . currently. this is already a means of mass disinformation. they are controlled by these globalists. elite, secondly, the ideology that promotes the current agenda

in the west has one competitive advantage over the ideology that should have encouraged people to at least start thinking, this advantage in that liberalism must be nationally universal and advances in very simple object forms and very quickly reaches citizens in uniform. there are pleasures of some kind of joy and some kind of everyday opportunity. that's where conservatism improve your life. it's going very hard in the west today. mainly for the reason that he is not above the national, because he is national at best, he is not supranational, that is, if you plant today a frenchman and a german of conservatives or italians and french of conservatives who proceed from the fact that here i am italian in this value, they interrupt each other in a few minutes and are unlikely to be able to create a single common powerful movement and the only alternative here could be religious conservatism, when these people would think of themselves as christians, but today the main christian church in the west

is moving in the same left-liberal side is basically what irritates the most conservative conservative-minded citizens in these countries and within the catholic church. there is huge and such fermentation between more conservative and more. uh, liberal -minded people like that and uh in these conditions. i think in the west it is expected that at some point they realize you understand their point of view it would not be worth it to me more. calms and excites here interests. this is what i get the impression, maybe my colleagues will not agree with me, but i have the impression that for about a year now, that is, the dreams of last year, like our western opponents have more strategies in our regard. no, that is, she was. she was ultimate. i understand. it consisted in the fact that now , under the massed economic pressure, under e, that means a picture of protracted hostilities , and e, with this hype and hysteria which

will be created in the media in russia, state power will collapse. after that, they will be able to wash this space as they want, bringing their puppets to power, which means that after that russia will no longer pose any threat to them. a year has passed, and you correctly pointed to singh. you know you can open. eh, for a month. there are reports of the same large well funded there in one report. there will be six contradictory positions, six contradictory forecasts, and in a month you can see that the position will change. that's the way the statement of politicians. they may say in the morning that it is necessary for russia to stop hostilities and begin peace talks by evening say that the only way is to defeat russia on the battlefield. this actually gives me the impression that there are strategies undoubtedly. uh, tactics in our respect are

operational actions that they perform . here and there, somewhere it inflicts on a level, somewhere they fail to do this. well, they don’t have an understanding of what will happen if i also agree with mine, not if and when we win, they don’t have the same understanding of what will happen if they want what they want, that russia, let’s say, will lose in this confrontation next, what will you do? under these conditions, you have already shown the whole world that your institutions are a sham. your right it's fiction, what's yours? we behavior is fiction. and in principle, the whole world is now just waiting. at what point will all this stop so that new balances and forces in the regions begin to form and, perhaps, new institutions, new law. from this point of view, i consider it a very important event. uh, what is connected with iran and saudi arabia, not only and not so much because of china, but because of the fact that, uh, this is such, cherry on the cake of the failure of the us middle east policy here in china

they signed in tehran. i'm a little more important another important thing is that this is an event in the chain that was before that biden threatened mohammed bin salman, is there, if they don’t reconsider their decision to cut production, then there will be very serious consequences for saudi arabia, these consequences were not. this is the same chain of events, which is that such could not be fucking concluded. what a deal, although everything is galya, well, everything is now against the backdrop of russia’s actions and rampa will pull up to themselves about everything and a powerful blow will be dealt to russia. we didn't happen either. this is the same chain that put an end to the civil strife in syria yes, there are many problems there are huge problems of suffering for the local population, but russia did not allow the united states to implement its plan in the middle east today i even see a statement by representatives

of the israeli political elite, which tasks. basically, the current leadership is blamed for this, israel that they didn’t see it, they didn’t finish it, well, it’s clear that these are their internal political goals of reality, misunderstanding lies behind this. how about us continue talking with the americans about the situation in this region, or there are already new forces that you have to reckon with and somehow build your policy for the future against the same background. we see now this week these events in georgia, they are really very important. i think our population is well aware that there would be no law on foreign agents. there would be a rise in the price of something or a change in some kind of pension there , anything, anything, any social protest very easily takes people out into the street, then in a few days it transforms into a political protest and it doesn’t matter at all. what was the original purpose. you can, and from this point of view, the georgian leadership acted. in my opinion , it is wrong to abandon this

bill, because it never leads me to anything. an unknown case, when such protests are held, the government takes a step back and the organizers. these are the color revolutions. uh, too, take a step back go to some compromise negotiations. they this is perceived as an opportunity to push further already translates the protest into, uh, a political channel. we talked about it here. we said that mikhail isaakashvili's attempts to return to political life. eh? they have no other purpose than the need for the western elites to unleash another massacre and war against south ossetia abkhazia is desirable. having done this simultaneously with nagorno-karabakh, so that the entire south caucasus would blaze, and russia would be forced to extinguish these fires, concentrating incredible huge resources here and there. i am facing huge problems.

you have to understand that in georgia there is no about the russian government in georgia about the georgian government and it’s just that the situation is developing and our foreign policy is such that we are quite satisfied about the georgian government in georgia about the moldovan government of moldova about the italian government in italy because any country where the government proceeds from its own national interests. they are from ideological and completely crazy houses, which in reality are simply promote the american foreign political concept. here is any such country he has, well, in general, big problems. it will not be in russia, because it is in the interests of these countries to have normal working relations with russia, but we see on the example of georgia how important and how often it happens that we do not finalize in the countries that surround us, of course, it is very important what is happening in india there in iran well, we will not figure it out with our inner circle yet to say that we are a great power that decides the fate of the world it will be very difficult, and with our environment we have quite enough problems. it seems to me

that we need to proceed from two things, firstly, to work more actively. not just wine, of course, to attend festivals and raise the tait of friendship of peoples there, but to work with the local political academic economic elite, do not be absolutely shy about working and launching your own non-governmental organizations with opposition parties. actually, the agenda used to be difficult to do before. i understand 20 years ago we promoted the same agenda that the americans just did it worse, yes, mediocre and in any cis country tells that the guys. follow us. together with the americans, we will build a liberal world. this is idiocy would be, of course, understandable. today we tell these people there are our rivals. they want to destroy your culture, the traditions of the history of heroes, your general future of your children is we, who want to preserve what makes you people and what makes you. uh, here is this group of people with a single collective self

-identification for this opportunity. eat plus, it seems to me that it would be nice to start building elites in these states, because we proceed from the fact that if we support the weakest idiot in some country, he will always depend on us in return. it ends up being that as soon as, well, the decisive moment comes when you need to take action, he manifests himself as an absolutely feeble idiot, and therefore you should not be surprised later that we have problems there in this country. some i'm due to this concludes what i want to say. here we are all the time looking there, what is happening in the west , we see something else, they want to destroy us. i want these people to hear, if they listen to us and watch , russia did not have and does not have the task of destroying, say , western civilization, because russia is not coming out. even from the understanding of civilization. the same as western countries, western countries through the mouth, uh, intellectually gifted josep barel, declared that it means that the west

is an oasis, a garden, a garden, and around, uh, solid jungle russia, the world is perceived absolutely not so russia says civilization does not happen alone. and everything else civilization is different, they are not good bad. these are different civilizations. we see the world. thus . we see western civilization in this world as well, but we will never in our lifetime allow this civilization to be exclusive in regards. whoever you are. because the manifestation of this exclusivity is the footage that you showed when they invaded a truly peaceful, prosperous country in syria unleashed a civil war there, allegedly under the slogans that their heart aches so much for the syrian people a. the dictatorship of the race - it tortured them. and when there was an earthquake and these children were lying under the rubble. they said it would be ironic to help with the regime. assad in this situation. that's how they take care of people. that is, if someone is part of your

military-political alliance, say, turkey, their children are important to you. and if this is a country or the leadership did not please something, then their children should not die under the rubble to receive no humanitarian aid, nothing, because you think it's ironic, that 's what russia should exclude from world practice. just on the vine to talk about china so it's about time you know, and what will the thrust say? it seems to me that we are all already a little bit sinologists and will be the same and will only deepen and expand our knowledge little by little, it seems to me that they just talked a little bit all the time like china is talking and so on, but i would partly agree with you from colleagues americanists, too, which is impossible, of course to say that we are not a threat to the united states and they will leave us behind, but we are different types of threats, that is , china is slowly being squeezed out of the entire space of the globe, the united states has pushed out of europe since 21, in fact, has become

a major one in the largest trading partner of the european union, but it’s like here, if we compare yes, well, i don’t know how successful the metaphor of china is, won like water fills the ship slowly from all sides, and our army. she can just break the skull of the captain and this is such a different type of americans call it acute threats. well, really. if we now mean a gap in the front there, then what will nato become? this is actually a demonstration of the inefficiency of all the systems of american alliances, of course, it will be such a shock shock situation for the united states immediately in europe, everyone will come right , they will not be from these notorious atlanticists, which means leftists, like are they called there? as soon as they call the deep state and so on they'll come right, like georgia meloni. here, where it is thinly torn there in italy, she came to power. then it will be germany france and so on. that there is a whole system of control of power by the degree of rightness and rightness. everything is not yet. she somehow,

well, there stands a nato contingent, this is a radish man. as he said, the comrade became red on top, and whitened inside. yes, there are different types of threats. we have an acute threat. china actually has a permanent replacement of dollars by the yuan, and so on for a long time to argue absolutely mentioned iran there , which means that they reconciled the gardens sooner, but why could they do this? are they such subtle politicians, what? no just saudi arabia and iran you're the biggest trading partner. they say in china, the guys decided all the money. in general, we are, as it were, shunis, with sunnis, shiites. well, in general, as if pagans by and large, anyway, we will manage here without the united states, this is the expulsion of the united states from the region, but it is slowly painful, that is, there is no transmission like you have where they offer almost everything without exception . someone verbally, someone mentally nuke your tone. yes, that is, we, unfortunately, well , such and such rhetoric is really not there, that

is, yes, they want in these oceanic regions take back the old russia is really the western world, if the united states is the only contender for the leadership of the western world. this russian federation is what the germans are like and the population. no, that is, it means that the scope of the geopolitical and so on and space is something, probably, it was said here that we are now fighting against the west alone de facto. yes, this is a really serious story. we will return from the 20th century . in the nineteenth century, the russian empire was really the only competitor. british empire on for world domination now in 2023, of course, it seems like some fantastic talk, but let's see how it all develops further, because it will crumble, most likely the house of cards after ukraine is very serious, therefore, here are two, such as threats and china and russia, we complement each other. well, we , if we are the west, then everything that is west of the urals will be us, which means that , uh, they arranged everything in their own way, the chinese would arrange everything in asia in their own way to arrange everything for japan, south korea. it will return to the big cradle

chinese civilization, which was now strongly pressed by the united states. so it's really absolutely true. you said you read the telegram channel thank you. it’s easier to read, repost your energy, you probably recommend everything, which means that mister defense, and china is not enough for china, that is, chinese politicians are under personal sanctions, because this is really such an amazing story. he is famous for the fact that he means commanded, including armaments development department, that is, this is equipment. the first to transfer the equipment of this uav, and so on and so forth, and commanded the headquarters of the strategic support troops, these are both cyber troops and space troops, and shot down, in fact, an exercise in how to shoot down a satellite in near-earth space, that is, in the event of a nuclear war, my military colleagues experts will correct it, if anything, it means in the event of a real nuclear war, in order to blind, and the enemy needs to be shot down by his satellites. then just, well, this weapon becomes useless, it won't work won't hit targets.

if you bring the jews out of here, we will introduce you to the rank of alexander gitsenko, now only soviet people could save other fish. not here, yevgeny tkachuk i’m lucky i’m sure i’ll be with you until the end of my life fedor dobronravov will figure it out on the shelves, sort it out four moves ahead, sergey makovetsky sees his comrades for the campaign relied on me comradely kiselyov konstantinbetsky never lost, no way.

and the fact that now sidimpin went for a third term. here it is very important to have such materiel chinese chinese, the leader of the three positions came. yes, yes, he has come, he has already come. yes, we congratulate him. that's last, so friday. now the prime minister is appointing deputy prime ministers there, and so on, so what is the most important thing here?