quite reasonably they say that we are dealing with the failure of western countries' policies in various regions one after another, of course, the most obvious example. this is the middle east , where one by one their projects with respect to the largest players simply fail. this region is a clear example. this means china and taiwan where we understand that, most likely, after the next elections. we will be dealing with another government. taiwan , which will be completely different in relation to china, we see this in relation to ukraine, today the rent corporation writes an article in which it honestly speaks. he says we failed, because apart from the west, no one is going to take any steps against russia for one reason, because everyone hates stockpiles. the whole world hates our countries. and with this you need to get used to the fact that this approach did not work. of course, it would be too early to rejoice here, i think, and there is no need to put on what, well, now they will fall behind, if this approach did not work for them, then the only thing left for them is this. burn other regions near

russia in order to divert our resources and involve us there as much as possible. well , i thought that was the reason. why? it seems that there is a mechanism and a machine such a harvester working? but the content that they upload there is very short-lived, that is, they succeed, sort of, in bringing their representatives to power. there in distant civilizations strange regions. they manage to bring them. they look very awkward against the local background. anyway, sooner or later they lose to the local representative of the local culture, who takes over. it seems to me that here continuing just the topic that sergei touched on it seems to me that here it is quite possible and necessary to re-read the works of nietzsche , who described what is happening in western civilizations at the moment, apparently without assuming that there is a little bit, having changed places. some terms. you can simply predict the future exactly up to each individual citizen of this country . after all, he told us that

this process is taking place in the west, what he called the death of god. today we see the most striking manifestation of this in western civilization, in which consequently happens what he predicted. he said that as a result of this, a person will lose confidence in any form. e of such e supersensible, that is, everything that is higher than specific feelings , to touch, to feel there, to see such a perception of landmarks in life, that all this will be lost, that landmarks in life will be only what we will see , feel and what will be give us pleasure. here now the results of this necessarily will be that the person is an orphan. he will be alone, he will wander, he will feel utterly meaningless. well, he predicts says that on the other hand the result of this. can hypothetically become the one that the superman will appear. this was his idea. what is a superman? he

says he will be the meaning of nature. he will become the meaning of everything; he will be in the center of the universe in general. but he contrasted the last man with such a superman, and it seems to me that this is the only one. what is he in here western man was wrong about civilization, because the last man is not the antipode, the superman of man. this is the development of the superman of man. this is the next step of the superman of a person in his understanding, because as soon as this person appeared, who in the center he turned into the last person whom he describes , he says that his entire meaning of existence is just comfort zones, and he actually conveys his entire essence animal state, that it is already very difficult to distinguish it from an animal, this is where our western opponents. and this is the reason why they cannot impose their concept for a long time on other civilizations, because nowhere is the process of which western philosophers said anything about. this is the death of god nowhere, except for western civilization, did not happen they themselves to this. we went very confidently

somewhere to impose somewhere as a result of the adoption of different concepts by lg and every time when it is not there they try to impose it on an alien civilization. it just doesn't find it for itself. in this culture, there are no foundations of bases for in order to somehow become attached and develop in these civilizations. in our case, for me personally, as a citizen of russia, a very important moment. i say this every time when i see our president during his speeches. he does not act as a social conservative. he speaks clearly, like a religious conservative from various tractors, what kind of conservatism is this, maybe he just doesn’t like some manifestations of liberalism. no , he is an absolutely clearly calibrated religious conservative. why is this important because a society that at the doctrinal level, as a collective value, proclaims the absence of the metaphysics of god is a sick society, it cannot exist for a long time, because a person without god is herself a lonely being in the world.

then a person becomes an animal, because god is the only thing that makes a person like god, if there is no god, then a person is no different from an ant, a crocodile, a dog , a cat, and then his whole life becomes absolutely meaningless, and a society that has no meaning is ahead of the whole world. society cannot be like that. it's impossible any civilization will come to this. this is western civilization at the present moment. and this will not end with the fact that all of humanity will perish perish. this civilization will survive those civilizations that did not follow this path turned out to be more competitive. and ending here. i want to say that the biggest competitive advantage of our country, besides the fact that we are the largest country in the world, that we have a powerful armed forces, very talented people and not yet completely killed educational scientific systems that produce good personnel is the biggest competitive advantage of our country is that we are able to understand other people's cultures, and in reality. we do not respect them. and

there will never be such a term as tolerance. here is the word tolerance, it is translated as i do not need tolerance towards muslims towards buddhists towards jews. i don't have to tolerate their presence in my life. i have respect for them, harmony in family relations is what distinguishes our country from them, what that's all that is not mine, i have to endure it. that's at best. i need to learn to be patient. there is someone else and our understanding of other cultures, respect for them and absolutely no attempts to impose our own way of life and values ​​on other peoples. this is what makes us a great power for millennia and gives us a competitive advantage. before that civilization, which for several centuries actually occupied a dominant position in the world. but today it is slipping into oblivion. now i will swear but i want to say what we have going on. uh, small but very fundamental changes for the better. just fundamental changes. you do, because we're getting rid of

learned helplessness. this is a very painful thing, we are cured of it. we begin to understand, when i say we mean, not the people that you know so well, i mean the state administration bodies. they begin to understand that everything that we do not produce ourselves, we may not have it, but if the glass is not produced in russia, op, it will not be. we begin to understand that the only way to be guaranteed to be defeated is strategic armor. now, if you stand and courageously take on the blow of fate, you are dead in order to win, you must attack. you must impose your will on the enemy. and for this you must understand , perceive him as an enemy, and not as, to put it as a homosexual partner, we have built. i realized that this is very unpleasant to hear for people who are faced with this.

we have built a super-efficient system at the federal level so far, and the linear management, that is, the system ensures the adoption and execution of significant decisions. it has not yet been deployed in the direction of frontal development. it still provides a piecewise discontinuous development, but when i look at it from the side, of course, i experience it all the time. some of these are shocks. oh, and our vice-premiers have begun to answer for something. the same has never happened. deputy prime minister was responsible for something, and i have been answering for 3 years. well, two and a half really answer. we have never had it so that you are answered quickly and that they responded to you proactively so that, uh, you sent a piece of paper. then they reported it on social media. a piece of paper that has not yet left the state duma, you have already been answered in social networks, they have begun to decide, while this is episodic. but this is already in

many regions, because digitalization and in this respect mishustin is really a russian miracle, but immediately after the advertisement, so that there is no feeling that everything is fine. here is now advertising, and then already all is well. jim jatters us state department where he worked for some time in the bureau of soviet affairs he foresaw what was happening now in ukraine it is a trap for russia which was prepared at the beginning of 2022. don't think anyone outside

the government. known for sure. how many americans are now in ukraine, they are fighting for the interests of the ideological machine is also worth paying attention to the efforts of the united states our fundamental mistake all the way was. in what respect to the west, we treated the west seriously and with respect.

we take them seriously, we must treat them like a bydlogopathy, which is not able to abide by even its own rules, like nixon said. i want my interlocutors to tremble, not knowing what i threw out tomorrow and we are starting to get a little closer to this. i want to read out what i said, how i explained the incident with him, and our us ambassador, comrade anton, i quote verbatim by the drone, however, this is a translation of the interview from english back, but, nevertheless. and find, it means that he had a meeting with an assistant in the public sector, in my opinion. there was a constructive discussion on this topic. i hope she understood what he was saying. i what did he say to her, i quote, there was no contact, there was no using no weapons by our fighters, the unmanned vehicle crashed into space quotes close up. what

a space like this water. this is how you should talk to them guys. go to hell, the door is over there, i really hope that in due time, an operation called lindsey graham will be carried out soon, this is, dear no, some senator has set the time for us who were called to call now to clog our planes. we can collect. american military satellite and non- american satellites that hang over ukraine and provide ah, so to speak, intelligence data to america, we can eliminate them, which means they need to be eliminated about the ukrainian group of throwers, baths with cucumbers, accidentally shot down a satellite constellation, starling, working in the interests of the ukrainian army, for example, well, for example, well,

well, well, it's not either from tomatoes or cucumbers. there was a grandmother who knocked down our wounds. we same husband liquidate. i'm not talking about the notorious bridges. uh, electricity decision-making centers and so on. i'm talking about intellectual poduru property, that is, in the fifteenth year said the guys. well, who doesn’t how to ensure the recognition of crimea is very simple those who do not recognize intellectual property in crimea are not recognized on the territory of crimea if now because now they do not recognize the service of russia who behaves incorrectly means cancel their intellectual property to hell and provide for recovery procedures not less. oh yes, we have president putin yes , we have wonderful words, says simonova , she said about protecting our business. it's necessary, but the key is on the other side. in this tin can, the key is on the other side, because the problem is not in business that we do not have scammers.

eat in the car, eat in a collar, go free. the problem is that representatives of law enforcement agencies, who have been marinating a person in a pre-trial detention center for several years, he says, oh, i'm sorry, sleep well, another thousand facts have not been confirmed, you will be treated at your own expense. if he should have us. instead of taking the place of the one whom he foolishly imprisoned for selfish reasons. he is everything instead wonderful. everything is fine. in extreme cases , they are fired from work. that's where he gets kicked out or push is like, call me, who he got for this, probably, you never know, he is also financially not responsible for the damage that he caused does not bear any immateriality at all. and if he is not promoted , he still, well, fate cries such appeals come. the attorney general speaks today and says, you know, it's the developers' fault. not my ministry of finance, dearly beloved , not monopolists, there is no one there yet

, no fools who have destroyed. well then the design business in russia was severely undermined due to the fault of developers. 2.5 million schoolchildren in the country go to school on the second shift. she gave an example from ingushetia and so on. that is, developers. they just delay the delivery of objects, they are too lazy, they build people and nothing can be done with them. we are from the business on the link, we blow it away. they are also a business. they are also a business. so here's the key not to in terms of what we think business is. it is the saints who take responsibility from them and let them go, by the way, by saying a simple question. why do we have these seven statements of the president are imprisoned in the season, and the president's intention for non-violent crimes should also not be at all. developers did not understand how they work in moscow in the moscow region. this is another story. i'm talking about the country. yes, yes, simple. well, there are better practices. what is the problem with using them is that they do not apply,

i need them. they take an advance, they are doing well. developers builder, huh? those who work in moscow. yes, just what is strange, yes, that is, practices bring in less money than worse. in fact. no, better practices bring in effective enough money and most importantly replayability. this is a standardization issue. here it is necessary to look at a specific case. why is this happening it may be, uh, completely local cunning showdowns give documents do not allow connection to require a lot of money to reconcile. it's just there. you have to figure it out. in each specific case, maybe they forgot to do their geophysics here, there is a wonderful episode with all the honest structures of the volga that were put into operation from which they took from they reported acceptance, only they can’t get them into operation, because they can’t agree on the papers. and there, it means that feces are flooded around them, but i told you, there, the guys decided, uh, decentrator. investments in

the data center are significantly less than the cost of connecting electricity. moreover , you will also pay for this electricity in general. this is the concept of connection, i always admire it how to take money for entry to a gas station. listen, as well as connection, as well as connection to gas. which means, well, of course, here is the connection. i don't say that is this is completely nonsense and in some cases the act of connecting to gas costs more than a house, in general , that is, this is the arbitrariness of monopolies. and when we say, and this is also business with me , in many cases, when we say guys, let's blow dust off them. let's first punish those who commit crimes against business. sometimes you want the ministry of common sense to be oh well, really, just some things are required here. elementary common sense and then everything will go much faster and will be resolved. you can immediately with a problem with sizo problems with a sizo when

that the president says that this should not be done for non-violent crimes, out of season, everyone listens, approves, clap, and it all continues. mish sorry, you know interesting mikhail excuse me, you know, it's interesting that here is the position of vyacheslav mikhailovich, the swan of the chief justice, thanks to his personal efforts, a colossal decriminalization of a number of articles and the prison population took place. we have twice twice. yes, and without an increase in crime. this is a personal merit of the outstanding cold summer, 53 years old. this is the personal merit of vyacheslav mikhailovich well, at the same time, look at the rules for applying practice and how it works. this is the detention and these detentions in the pre-trial detention center and there is a feeling that simply no one can do anything. that is, it is like a separate world. there are many other questions, starting with what is among, where, for example, partially criminalized articles.

well, from my point of view, corruption in power is treason to the motherland and there can be no mercy here. here in other areas. yeah well economic crime guys and let's say, but corruption in power-a betrayal of the motherland as espionage. like sabotage and so on. there are no medvedev fines here. god forbid, you can't. there should be a taboo, but nevertheless , the president in his message said a lot of wonderful things. in particular, he said about the girls for the second time in the thirteenth year from 14, first in the fourteenth year, wonderfully wonderful. i support business with my hands and feet. they say, listen, there are no laws. this can be done more simply. we have a wonderful practice when we tell the insurance company. an insurance company cannot have more than 10% in its capital the company is registered in shock. it just can't be a regulation. let's say we have adopted a law on

a concession in the housing and communal services. well, in the old way , in russian, there will be feeding of the housing and communal services when boyarin came and, therefore, feeds from the territory, well, according to the old investor. and the law is that all different concepts go from fabulous to real. so what needs to be done so that at the end of all housing and communal services we have offshore companies by law they cannot participate, according to the law , official comrades from the government come to explain. no, guys, you know, well, regarding direct offshore companies. we will continue to comply with the law, but in relation to indirect ones , you are not fooling this law. what is inert this is, if there is a good russian investor in the old way, who takes well, at the end of the session. now, most likely, utility owners, but he drives all the money through an offshore company. and how can this be done? elementary excellent but sometimes it is

a suggestion, but not an explanation mikhailantarnoe gourd. well, how does he do it? an offshore agreement on e, doing business at the end of a still russian legal entity, which with all the giblets belongs to an offshore offshore company, which in turn belongs to a citizen of the russian federation, that is, money is driven through an offshore tax is concentrated in shock, taxes are not are paid. why don't many people pay? because they do not pay and how they are driven. so they drive out the countries you drive out. yes, if you are registered here, as a legal entity, then here any, but the contract of the contract of the purchase of technology inflating balloons of the purchase of software. you can't do anything like that. you will now come to the bank with this agreement, and you will immediately leave , they will politely tell you. and why are you buying for his toilet? no, i don't have utilities in my project. this now does not

work at all, that is, the banks disappeared in the most severe control. there is the same way to transfer money there, firstly, if it’s not friendly, but you won’t overtake it if you don’t have this currency $251 billion left the country, firstly, it left the country in a completely different way, so it is very important here. but to know specifically how it was done, because otherwise we are somewhere through offshore companies. after that, there is still no way through any concession not according to this scheme. they are going away. this is very clear and it is important to understand that the scheme that you drew, it does not work at all now. you will come to the bank with this document. and then you leave, no one will even talk, especially technology. yes , of course, because you need sales technology in the west. you don't have a western bank to which you will now transfer money from a russian bank, even if there is an agreement just an agreement, of course, an agreement according to the rule of the country, it is

now forbidden to work with russian banks through any country. are you that russian banks can't do it? that is, these are transactions that are friendly or not hostile country? and this is also true. because now the westerners are covering up everything that they can not now, they are really working. no, it's much more difficult. i agree now is not the nineties, but it works just fine. and they tell you no, straight to shorts are good. we're not the president anyway. we will comply with the law, and indirectly offshore . it is necessary to invite a person and the central bank, which sits in these areas. and we have a separate service strongly monitoring, which is headed by a very professional person who is clearly clear he will say how the money went, because these 261 billion that left the country. these are not

thin trickles from some universal structures. this is obviously done by completely different people with completely different streams, because the scheme that you describe is very expensive. it’s very complicated and it’s not worth the money, that is, large ones bring completely different charts out of the country through offshore companies , but in shorts. you do not hear me. i 'm talking about something else altogether. with these small flows, such large sums do not go away. so here we just need to calmly talk with people who do this professionally, who will say quite specifically. here's a simple question 261 billion. how many transactions did it take? that's when we'll know the answer. for how many transactions through which paths then everything will rise at once , it is clear and this is evident, all banking is transparent and this, of course, is not a million, thin structures are too expensive now with a million thin

works. so, i was wrong in the nineties did not end in the nineties, in general , speech, in fact, is different, therefore, now the space policy of the nineties. this not at all about economic policy economic policy. however, it is not even to the ministry of finance. that is, here it is necessary to send a request quite specifically. this is how a deputy can do this to the central bank and ask that the monitoring just review specific films on this topic, because now we will look quietly for what is happening. ants, not noticing how elephants carry logs. i'm only talking about this, that we need to stop this topic, that we need to close offshore, business, doubts. no. here we are with you absolute dynamism, and they still explain to me who the representatives of the state are. and who? well, i can’t name specifically to call a chilovka in the face right away what it is when i bring people to a state of sincerity, when they say what they think.

how can you, it’s convenient for business, the dog state does not know anything about what is convenient for business, what is convenient for business knows business, so it’s strange when representatives of the state talk about convenience for business, it’s very strange, but they are one of these his views builds a policy no rightness i allow myself to quote. and the fact that we e was said officially. as a result, the only guarantee of civilized foreign trade, when i say, excuse me, what kind of civilized trade, when we have sanctions , we bot our arguments and at one time they were necessarily presented, then the only thing i need to understand? china takes them or not, because, as i understand it, on the topic. that's it, now there is a very difficult game with china, so china, as i understand it, is trying to intercept. that's what the americans have. no, i’m not talking about that , so here, when there are always nuances , you know, so to speak, yes, for example, i don’t like the very idea, there is an extension of food deals. this is all the rest, when businessmen begin to look at the nuances,

when, in parallel with this, suddenly bach, the turks had previously stopped the passage of sanctioned goods. they pumped through themselves in russia, yes, when they went, that is, since they had to re -register here, bach again draws up. they twisted our hands, got what they wanted, began to earn money, whether we gave them it is a question of who to whom, what they unscrewed, they did not give sweden. welcome to join nato that is, this is such a complex system and it is not clear who is twisting what this system is to whom. i would say that this is a difficult search for balances, so everything is very much needed to consider all the nuances of a person’s hand, but he is not interested in production in russia. so if he is interested, he will intercept from the americans, what he is interested in, china china does not hide its interest in itself. but if china is not interested in working with us, we will have big problems, because there we are just he is interested in

trading years. well, it is not in the development of the russian federation that he has the conditions under which he will be interested, but you just said that money cannot be pumped in. and when you say that money cannot be transferred to those countries? why should china invest here if it cannot return the profit? china is investing in itself. sorry again, if he will never invest in someone else , he will pick up his workers there and is going to invest in russia in our workers. and you are not going to forbid him, he invested here, we have chinese automobile factories working for them, that chinese workers do not work for belarus , chinese workers do not work for them. and if he forbids them to invest the profits from it back to china they will say guys. everything, of course, is great, but what's the point. the twenty- third year is the year of fantastic inflation, when the mark is gold. yes, it's worth

billions. first of all, they offer a powerful state that will take care of you on the one hand, and on the other, it says that others are to blame for all your troubles. in this the case of the jews. who owns large germany in most cases, the jews are indeed a large part of the population. really no good multi-party democracy parliament, strong hands were required very well. here is the state of education.